The effect of pain on training-induced plasticity of the corticomotor system
Abstract Pain is thought to interfere with training-induced plasticity of corticomotor pathways. Although this implies direct interference with plastic processes, it may be explained by compromised performance in the training task during pain. Repeated finger movements can induce plasticity and chan...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | European journal of pain 2011-11, Vol.15 (10), p.1028-1034 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 1034 |
---|---|
container_issue | 10 |
container_start_page | 1028 |
container_title | European journal of pain |
container_volume | 15 |
creator | Ingham, Damian Tucker, Kylie J Tsao, Henry Hodges, Paul W |
description | Abstract Pain is thought to interfere with training-induced plasticity of corticomotor pathways. Although this implies direct interference with plastic processes, it may be explained by compromised performance in the training task during pain. Repeated finger movements can induce plasticity and change the amplitude/direction of acceleration of finger movement evoked by transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS). We hypothesized that if pain interferes with plasticity, acceleration of finger movement would not change when the training task was painful, despite control of training task performance. TMS was applied over the optimal scalp site to evoked index finger abduction movements in nine participants. Participants then trained finger adduction with feedback of finger acceleration for three 8-min sessions, in three conditions on separate days. Conditions: first dorsal interosseus (FDI) pain and control (no-pain), with injection of 5% and 0.9% hypertonic saline, respectively, into FDI; and remote pain (5% saline injection into infrapatellar fat pad). Peak acceleration of TMS-evoked finger movement and amplitude of motor evoked potentials (MEPs) in FDI were measured at baseline, between training sessions, and at three 5-min intervals after training ceased. Plastic change was observed (reduced TMS evoked peak finger acceleration in the abduction direction) after motor training during control and FDI pain, but not during the remote pain. There was no change in FDI MEPs in any conditions. These data do not support direct effects of nociceptive input (pain) on training-induced plasticity of corticomotor pathways. Remote pain may compromise learning due to distraction from the training task or other complex central pain processes. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.ejpain.2011.04.006 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_902328860</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>1_s2_0_S1090380111000930</els_id><sourcerecordid>902328860</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5040-9fd253f0c6fad5490e6388bfc4dde13d561d13f697a0e0f69738b4c6205548ef3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNUk1v1DAUjBCIlsI_QCg3TgnPsZ2PCxJUpQWtShELHJ-y9jM4zcaLnVDy73FI6YELnN6TNTO2ZyZJnjLIGbDyRZdTd2jtkBfAWA4iByjvJcdM8iIrmGjuxx0ayHgN7Ch5FEIHAKIC_jA5KpisoK7ZcbLZfqOUjCE1ps6ki2DqhnT0cbHD18wOelKk00PfhtEqO84LbIwk5Xw8cHs3Op-GOYy0f5w8MG0f6MntPEk-vTnbnl5km_fnb09fbTIlQUDWGF1IbkCVptVSNEAlr-udUUJrYlzLkmnGTdlULRAsk9c7ocoCpBQ1GX6SPF91D959nyiMuLdBUd-3A7kpYAMFL-q6hIgUK1J5F4Ingwdv962fkQEuNmKHq4242IggMNoYac9uL5h2e9J3pD--RUCzAm5sT_N_ieLZuysmf78pW7k2evbzjtv6aywrXkn8cnmOH1hzWb2--ozbiH-54ila-sOSx6AsDTEV62NsqJ3912_-FlB9TFe1_TXNFDo3-SHGhQxDgYAfl9osrWEsNqbhwH8B6uy6_Q</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>902328860</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The effect of pain on training-induced plasticity of the corticomotor system</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Access via Wiley Online Library</source><creator>Ingham, Damian ; Tucker, Kylie J ; Tsao, Henry ; Hodges, Paul W</creator><creatorcontrib>Ingham, Damian ; Tucker, Kylie J ; Tsao, Henry ; Hodges, Paul W</creatorcontrib><description>Abstract Pain is thought to interfere with training-induced plasticity of corticomotor pathways. Although this implies direct interference with plastic processes, it may be explained by compromised performance in the training task during pain. Repeated finger movements can induce plasticity and change the amplitude/direction of acceleration of finger movement evoked by transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS). We hypothesized that if pain interferes with plasticity, acceleration of finger movement would not change when the training task was painful, despite control of training task performance. TMS was applied over the optimal scalp site to evoked index finger abduction movements in nine participants. Participants then trained finger adduction with feedback of finger acceleration for three 8-min sessions, in three conditions on separate days. Conditions: first dorsal interosseus (FDI) pain and control (no-pain), with injection of 5% and 0.9% hypertonic saline, respectively, into FDI; and remote pain (5% saline injection into infrapatellar fat pad). Peak acceleration of TMS-evoked finger movement and amplitude of motor evoked potentials (MEPs) in FDI were measured at baseline, between training sessions, and at three 5-min intervals after training ceased. Plastic change was observed (reduced TMS evoked peak finger acceleration in the abduction direction) after motor training during control and FDI pain, but not during the remote pain. There was no change in FDI MEPs in any conditions. These data do not support direct effects of nociceptive input (pain) on training-induced plasticity of corticomotor pathways. Remote pain may compromise learning due to distraction from the training task or other complex central pain processes.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1090-3801</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1532-2149</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.ejpain.2011.04.006</identifier><identifier>PMID: 21570881</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford, UK: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Anesthesia & Perioperative Care ; Attention ; Conditioning (Psychology) - physiology ; Evoked Potentials, Motor - physiology ; Female ; Fingers - innervation ; Fingers - physiology ; Humans ; Male ; Motor control ; Motor Cortex - physiology ; Motor evoked potential ; Motor learning ; Movement - physiology ; Neuronal Plasticity - physiology ; Pain ; Pain - physiopathology ; Pain Medicine ; Training ; Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation - methods ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>European journal of pain, 2011-11, Vol.15 (10), p.1028-1034</ispartof><rights>European Federation of International Association for the Study of Pain Chapters</rights><rights>2011 European Federation of International Association for the Study of Pain Chapters</rights><rights>2011 European Federation of Chapters of the International Association for the Study of Pain</rights><rights>Copyright © 2011 European Federation of International Association for the Study of Pain Chapters. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5040-9fd253f0c6fad5490e6388bfc4dde13d561d13f697a0e0f69738b4c6205548ef3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5040-9fd253f0c6fad5490e6388bfc4dde13d561d13f697a0e0f69738b4c6205548ef3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1016%2Fj.ejpain.2011.04.006$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1016%2Fj.ejpain.2011.04.006$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>315,781,785,1418,27928,27929,45578,45579</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21570881$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ingham, Damian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tucker, Kylie J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tsao, Henry</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hodges, Paul W</creatorcontrib><title>The effect of pain on training-induced plasticity of the corticomotor system</title><title>European journal of pain</title><addtitle>Eur J Pain</addtitle><description>Abstract Pain is thought to interfere with training-induced plasticity of corticomotor pathways. Although this implies direct interference with plastic processes, it may be explained by compromised performance in the training task during pain. Repeated finger movements can induce plasticity and change the amplitude/direction of acceleration of finger movement evoked by transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS). We hypothesized that if pain interferes with plasticity, acceleration of finger movement would not change when the training task was painful, despite control of training task performance. TMS was applied over the optimal scalp site to evoked index finger abduction movements in nine participants. Participants then trained finger adduction with feedback of finger acceleration for three 8-min sessions, in three conditions on separate days. Conditions: first dorsal interosseus (FDI) pain and control (no-pain), with injection of 5% and 0.9% hypertonic saline, respectively, into FDI; and remote pain (5% saline injection into infrapatellar fat pad). Peak acceleration of TMS-evoked finger movement and amplitude of motor evoked potentials (MEPs) in FDI were measured at baseline, between training sessions, and at three 5-min intervals after training ceased. Plastic change was observed (reduced TMS evoked peak finger acceleration in the abduction direction) after motor training during control and FDI pain, but not during the remote pain. There was no change in FDI MEPs in any conditions. These data do not support direct effects of nociceptive input (pain) on training-induced plasticity of corticomotor pathways. Remote pain may compromise learning due to distraction from the training task or other complex central pain processes.</description><subject>Anesthesia & Perioperative Care</subject><subject>Attention</subject><subject>Conditioning (Psychology) - physiology</subject><subject>Evoked Potentials, Motor - physiology</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Fingers - innervation</subject><subject>Fingers - physiology</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Motor control</subject><subject>Motor Cortex - physiology</subject><subject>Motor evoked potential</subject><subject>Motor learning</subject><subject>Movement - physiology</subject><subject>Neuronal Plasticity - physiology</subject><subject>Pain</subject><subject>Pain - physiopathology</subject><subject>Pain Medicine</subject><subject>Training</subject><subject>Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation - methods</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>1090-3801</issn><issn>1532-2149</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2011</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqNUk1v1DAUjBCIlsI_QCg3TgnPsZ2PCxJUpQWtShELHJ-y9jM4zcaLnVDy73FI6YELnN6TNTO2ZyZJnjLIGbDyRZdTd2jtkBfAWA4iByjvJcdM8iIrmGjuxx0ayHgN7Ch5FEIHAKIC_jA5KpisoK7ZcbLZfqOUjCE1ps6ki2DqhnT0cbHD18wOelKk00PfhtEqO84LbIwk5Xw8cHs3Op-GOYy0f5w8MG0f6MntPEk-vTnbnl5km_fnb09fbTIlQUDWGF1IbkCVptVSNEAlr-udUUJrYlzLkmnGTdlULRAsk9c7ocoCpBQ1GX6SPF91D959nyiMuLdBUd-3A7kpYAMFL-q6hIgUK1J5F4Ingwdv962fkQEuNmKHq4242IggMNoYac9uL5h2e9J3pD--RUCzAm5sT_N_ieLZuysmf78pW7k2evbzjtv6aywrXkn8cnmOH1hzWb2--ozbiH-54ila-sOSx6AsDTEV62NsqJ3912_-FlB9TFe1_TXNFDo3-SHGhQxDgYAfl9osrWEsNqbhwH8B6uy6_Q</recordid><startdate>201111</startdate><enddate>201111</enddate><creator>Ingham, Damian</creator><creator>Tucker, Kylie J</creator><creator>Tsao, Henry</creator><creator>Hodges, Paul W</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201111</creationdate><title>The effect of pain on training-induced plasticity of the corticomotor system</title><author>Ingham, Damian ; Tucker, Kylie J ; Tsao, Henry ; Hodges, Paul W</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5040-9fd253f0c6fad5490e6388bfc4dde13d561d13f697a0e0f69738b4c6205548ef3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2011</creationdate><topic>Anesthesia & Perioperative Care</topic><topic>Attention</topic><topic>Conditioning (Psychology) - physiology</topic><topic>Evoked Potentials, Motor - physiology</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Fingers - innervation</topic><topic>Fingers - physiology</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Motor control</topic><topic>Motor Cortex - physiology</topic><topic>Motor evoked potential</topic><topic>Motor learning</topic><topic>Movement - physiology</topic><topic>Neuronal Plasticity - physiology</topic><topic>Pain</topic><topic>Pain - physiopathology</topic><topic>Pain Medicine</topic><topic>Training</topic><topic>Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation - methods</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ingham, Damian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tucker, Kylie J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tsao, Henry</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hodges, Paul W</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>European journal of pain</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ingham, Damian</au><au>Tucker, Kylie J</au><au>Tsao, Henry</au><au>Hodges, Paul W</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The effect of pain on training-induced plasticity of the corticomotor system</atitle><jtitle>European journal of pain</jtitle><addtitle>Eur J Pain</addtitle><date>2011-11</date><risdate>2011</risdate><volume>15</volume><issue>10</issue><spage>1028</spage><epage>1034</epage><pages>1028-1034</pages><issn>1090-3801</issn><eissn>1532-2149</eissn><abstract>Abstract Pain is thought to interfere with training-induced plasticity of corticomotor pathways. Although this implies direct interference with plastic processes, it may be explained by compromised performance in the training task during pain. Repeated finger movements can induce plasticity and change the amplitude/direction of acceleration of finger movement evoked by transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS). We hypothesized that if pain interferes with plasticity, acceleration of finger movement would not change when the training task was painful, despite control of training task performance. TMS was applied over the optimal scalp site to evoked index finger abduction movements in nine participants. Participants then trained finger adduction with feedback of finger acceleration for three 8-min sessions, in three conditions on separate days. Conditions: first dorsal interosseus (FDI) pain and control (no-pain), with injection of 5% and 0.9% hypertonic saline, respectively, into FDI; and remote pain (5% saline injection into infrapatellar fat pad). Peak acceleration of TMS-evoked finger movement and amplitude of motor evoked potentials (MEPs) in FDI were measured at baseline, between training sessions, and at three 5-min intervals after training ceased. Plastic change was observed (reduced TMS evoked peak finger acceleration in the abduction direction) after motor training during control and FDI pain, but not during the remote pain. There was no change in FDI MEPs in any conditions. These data do not support direct effects of nociceptive input (pain) on training-induced plasticity of corticomotor pathways. Remote pain may compromise learning due to distraction from the training task or other complex central pain processes.</abstract><cop>Oxford, UK</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>21570881</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.ejpain.2011.04.006</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1090-3801 |
ispartof | European journal of pain, 2011-11, Vol.15 (10), p.1028-1034 |
issn | 1090-3801 1532-2149 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_902328860 |
source | MEDLINE; Access via Wiley Online Library |
subjects | Anesthesia & Perioperative Care Attention Conditioning (Psychology) - physiology Evoked Potentials, Motor - physiology Female Fingers - innervation Fingers - physiology Humans Male Motor control Motor Cortex - physiology Motor evoked potential Motor learning Movement - physiology Neuronal Plasticity - physiology Pain Pain - physiopathology Pain Medicine Training Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation - methods Young Adult |
title | The effect of pain on training-induced plasticity of the corticomotor system |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-17T07%3A03%3A47IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20effect%20of%20pain%20on%20training-induced%20plasticity%20of%20the%20corticomotor%20system&rft.jtitle=European%20journal%20of%20pain&rft.au=Ingham,%20Damian&rft.date=2011-11&rft.volume=15&rft.issue=10&rft.spage=1028&rft.epage=1034&rft.pages=1028-1034&rft.issn=1090-3801&rft.eissn=1532-2149&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.ejpain.2011.04.006&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E902328860%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=902328860&rft_id=info:pmid/21570881&rft_els_id=1_s2_0_S1090380111000930&rfr_iscdi=true |