Cultural Cognition and Public Policy: The Case of Outpatient Commitment Laws
What explains controversy over outpatient commitment laws (OCLs), which authorize courts to order persons with mental illness to accept outpatient treatment? We hypothesized that attitudes toward OCLs reflect "cultural cognition" ( DiMaggio, P. Annl Rev Sociol 23:263- 287, 1997 ), which mo...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Law and human behavior 2010-04, Vol.34 (2), p.118-140 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 140 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 2 |
| container_start_page | 118 |
| container_title | Law and human behavior |
| container_volume | 34 |
| creator | Kahan, Dan M Braman, Donald Monahan, John Callahan, Lisa Peters, Ellen |
| description | What explains controversy over outpatient commitment laws (OCLs), which authorize courts to order persons with mental illness to accept outpatient treatment? We hypothesized that attitudes toward OCLs reflect "cultural cognition" (
DiMaggio, P. Annl Rev Sociol 23:263- 287, 1997
), which motivates individuals to conform their beliefs about policy-relevant facts to their cultural values. In a study involving a diverse sample of Americans (N = 1,496), we found that individuals who are hierarchical and communitarian tend to support OCLs, while those who are egalitarian and individualistic tend to oppose them. These relationships, moreover, fit the cultural cognition hypothesis: that is, rather than directly influencing OCL support, cultural values, mediated by affect, shaped individuals' perceptions of how effectively OCLs promote public health and safety. We discuss the implications for informed public deliberation over OCLs. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s10979-008-9174-4 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_902077288</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>40608124</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>40608124</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a559t-ef39c35dd8671f7528ddf1685ffa68db2a35fa2f22ddeae6adf4e3deb76c9323</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkU9r3DAQxUVoaDZpP0AOLUsJ5BDczui_jmFp0kKgOeTQm5AtKfXitbeSfdhvXy1eGhJKehkd3u-9QfMIOUf4jADqS0YwylQAujKoeMWPyAKFYpWU-PMNWQByVSkG6oSc5rwGAKNBvCUnaFAWp1mQi9XUjVNy3XI1PPbt2A790vV-eT_VXdss74cyd-_IcXRdDu8P7xl5uPn6sPpW3f24_b66vqucEGasQmSmYcJ7LRVGJaj2PqLUIkYnta-pYyI6Gin1PrggnY88MB9qJRvDKDsjl3PsNg2_p5BHu2lzE7rO9WGYsjVAQSmq9X9JxZgAg4IV8tMLcj1MqS-_sAa51JpSeA2iwFECSlkgnKEmDTmnEO02tRuXdhbB7uuwcx221GH3dVhePB8PwVO9Cf7Jcbh_AegM5CL1jyE9bX4t9cNsWudxSH9DOUjQSPf61ay7rbPbvGtcGtumC7mZUgr9aLtftWXcUou4v-XFv-nn2B9J5Li0</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>204160166</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Cultural Cognition and Public Policy: The Case of Outpatient Commitment Laws</title><source>APA PsycARTICLES</source><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</source><source>HeinOnline Law Journal Library</source><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><source>EBSCOhost Business Source Complete</source><creator>Kahan, Dan M ; Braman, Donald ; Monahan, John ; Callahan, Lisa ; Peters, Ellen</creator><contributor>Cutler, Brian</contributor><creatorcontrib>Kahan, Dan M ; Braman, Donald ; Monahan, John ; Callahan, Lisa ; Peters, Ellen ; Cutler, Brian</creatorcontrib><description>What explains controversy over outpatient commitment laws (OCLs), which authorize courts to order persons with mental illness to accept outpatient treatment? We hypothesized that attitudes toward OCLs reflect "cultural cognition" (
DiMaggio, P. Annl Rev Sociol 23:263- 287, 1997
), which motivates individuals to conform their beliefs about policy-relevant facts to their cultural values. In a study involving a diverse sample of Americans (N = 1,496), we found that individuals who are hierarchical and communitarian tend to support OCLs, while those who are egalitarian and individualistic tend to oppose them. These relationships, moreover, fit the cultural cognition hypothesis: that is, rather than directly influencing OCL support, cultural values, mediated by affect, shaped individuals' perceptions of how effectively OCLs promote public health and safety. We discuss the implications for informed public deliberation over OCLs.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0147-7307</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-661X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10979-008-9174-4</identifier><identifier>PMID: 19169799</identifier><identifier>CODEN: LHBEDM</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Boston: Springer</publisher><subject><![CDATA[Adult ; Ambulatory Care - legislation & jurisprudence ; Attitudes ; Behavioral Science and Psychology ; Coercion ; Cognition ; Cognition & reasoning ; Cognitive models ; Cognitive therapy ; Commitment of Mentally Ill - legislation & jurisprudence ; Commitments ; Community and Environmental Psychology ; Community Mental Health Services - legislation & jurisprudence ; Courts ; Criminology and Criminal Justice ; Cultural Values ; Female ; Government Policy Making ; Homicide - legislation & jurisprudence ; Homicide - psychology ; Human ; Humans ; Individualism ; Insanity Defense ; Law ; Law and Psychology ; Law schools ; Laws ; Male ; Mental Disorders ; Mental Disorders - psychology ; Mental Disorders - rehabilitation ; Mental health ; Mental Illness ; Middle Aged ; Models, Psychological ; Original Article ; Outcome and Process Assessment (Health Care) ; Outpatient care facilities ; Outpatient Commitment ; Outpatient Treatment ; Patient Compliance - psychology ; Personality and Social Psychology ; Politics ; Prisoners - legislation & jurisprudence ; Prisoners - psychology ; Psychology ; Public Health ; Public Opinion ; Public Policy ; Public Policy - legislation & jurisprudence ; Safety ; Schizophrenia ; Schizophrenia - diagnosis ; Schizophrenia - rehabilitation ; Social Identification ; Social Values ; Studies ; Substance abuse treatment ; World view]]></subject><ispartof>Law and human behavior, 2010-04, Vol.34 (2), p.118-140</ispartof><rights>2010 American Psychology-Law Society/Division 41 of the American Psychological Association</rights><rights>2010 American Psychological Association</rights><rights>2010 American Psychology-Law Society/ Division 41 of the American Psychological Association</rights><rights>American Psychology-Law Society/Division 41 of the American Psychological Association 2009</rights><rights>American Psychology-Law Society/Division 41 of the American Psychological Association 2010</rights><rights>2009, American Psychology-Law Society/Division 41 of the American Psychological Association</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a559t-ef39c35dd8671f7528ddf1685ffa68db2a35fa2f22ddeae6adf4e3deb76c9323</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a559t-ef39c35dd8671f7528ddf1685ffa68db2a35fa2f22ddeae6adf4e3deb76c9323</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10979-008-9174-4$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10979-008-9174-4$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902,41464,42533,51294</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19169799$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><contributor>Cutler, Brian</contributor><creatorcontrib>Kahan, Dan M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Braman, Donald</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Monahan, John</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Callahan, Lisa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Peters, Ellen</creatorcontrib><title>Cultural Cognition and Public Policy: The Case of Outpatient Commitment Laws</title><title>Law and human behavior</title><addtitle>Law Hum Behav</addtitle><addtitle>Law Hum Behav</addtitle><description>What explains controversy over outpatient commitment laws (OCLs), which authorize courts to order persons with mental illness to accept outpatient treatment? We hypothesized that attitudes toward OCLs reflect "cultural cognition" (
DiMaggio, P. Annl Rev Sociol 23:263- 287, 1997
), which motivates individuals to conform their beliefs about policy-relevant facts to their cultural values. In a study involving a diverse sample of Americans (N = 1,496), we found that individuals who are hierarchical and communitarian tend to support OCLs, while those who are egalitarian and individualistic tend to oppose them. These relationships, moreover, fit the cultural cognition hypothesis: that is, rather than directly influencing OCL support, cultural values, mediated by affect, shaped individuals' perceptions of how effectively OCLs promote public health and safety. We discuss the implications for informed public deliberation over OCLs.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Ambulatory Care - legislation & jurisprudence</subject><subject>Attitudes</subject><subject>Behavioral Science and Psychology</subject><subject>Coercion</subject><subject>Cognition</subject><subject>Cognition & reasoning</subject><subject>Cognitive models</subject><subject>Cognitive therapy</subject><subject>Commitment of Mentally Ill - legislation & jurisprudence</subject><subject>Commitments</subject><subject>Community and Environmental Psychology</subject><subject>Community Mental Health Services - legislation & jurisprudence</subject><subject>Courts</subject><subject>Criminology and Criminal Justice</subject><subject>Cultural Values</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Government Policy Making</subject><subject>Homicide - legislation & jurisprudence</subject><subject>Homicide - psychology</subject><subject>Human</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Individualism</subject><subject>Insanity Defense</subject><subject>Law</subject><subject>Law and Psychology</subject><subject>Law schools</subject><subject>Laws</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Mental Disorders</subject><subject>Mental Disorders - psychology</subject><subject>Mental Disorders - rehabilitation</subject><subject>Mental health</subject><subject>Mental Illness</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Models, Psychological</subject><subject>Original Article</subject><subject>Outcome and Process Assessment (Health Care)</subject><subject>Outpatient care facilities</subject><subject>Outpatient Commitment</subject><subject>Outpatient Treatment</subject><subject>Patient Compliance - psychology</subject><subject>Personality and Social Psychology</subject><subject>Politics</subject><subject>Prisoners - legislation & jurisprudence</subject><subject>Prisoners - psychology</subject><subject>Psychology</subject><subject>Public Health</subject><subject>Public Opinion</subject><subject>Public Policy</subject><subject>Public Policy - legislation & jurisprudence</subject><subject>Safety</subject><subject>Schizophrenia</subject><subject>Schizophrenia - diagnosis</subject><subject>Schizophrenia - rehabilitation</subject><subject>Social Identification</subject><subject>Social Values</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Substance abuse treatment</subject><subject>World view</subject><issn>0147-7307</issn><issn>1573-661X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2010</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><sourceid>7UB</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkU9r3DAQxUVoaDZpP0AOLUsJ5BDczui_jmFp0kKgOeTQm5AtKfXitbeSfdhvXy1eGhJKehkd3u-9QfMIOUf4jADqS0YwylQAujKoeMWPyAKFYpWU-PMNWQByVSkG6oSc5rwGAKNBvCUnaFAWp1mQi9XUjVNy3XI1PPbt2A790vV-eT_VXdss74cyd-_IcXRdDu8P7xl5uPn6sPpW3f24_b66vqucEGasQmSmYcJ7LRVGJaj2PqLUIkYnta-pYyI6Gin1PrggnY88MB9qJRvDKDsjl3PsNg2_p5BHu2lzE7rO9WGYsjVAQSmq9X9JxZgAg4IV8tMLcj1MqS-_sAa51JpSeA2iwFECSlkgnKEmDTmnEO02tRuXdhbB7uuwcx221GH3dVhePB8PwVO9Cf7Jcbh_AegM5CL1jyE9bX4t9cNsWudxSH9DOUjQSPf61ay7rbPbvGtcGtumC7mZUgr9aLtftWXcUou4v-XFv-nn2B9J5Li0</recordid><startdate>20100401</startdate><enddate>20100401</enddate><creator>Kahan, Dan M</creator><creator>Braman, Donald</creator><creator>Monahan, John</creator><creator>Callahan, Lisa</creator><creator>Peters, Ellen</creator><general>Springer</general><general>Springer US</general><general>American Psychological Law Society</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>88C</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>8AM</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>BGRYB</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>K7.</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M0O</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M0T</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PADUT</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>PYYUZ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7RZ</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>7UB</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20100401</creationdate><title>Cultural Cognition and Public Policy</title><author>Kahan, Dan M ; Braman, Donald ; Monahan, John ; Callahan, Lisa ; Peters, Ellen</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a559t-ef39c35dd8671f7528ddf1685ffa68db2a35fa2f22ddeae6adf4e3deb76c9323</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2010</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Ambulatory Care - legislation & jurisprudence</topic><topic>Attitudes</topic><topic>Behavioral Science and Psychology</topic><topic>Coercion</topic><topic>Cognition</topic><topic>Cognition & reasoning</topic><topic>Cognitive models</topic><topic>Cognitive therapy</topic><topic>Commitment of Mentally Ill - legislation & jurisprudence</topic><topic>Commitments</topic><topic>Community and Environmental Psychology</topic><topic>Community Mental Health Services - legislation & jurisprudence</topic><topic>Courts</topic><topic>Criminology and Criminal Justice</topic><topic>Cultural Values</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Government Policy Making</topic><topic>Homicide - legislation & jurisprudence</topic><topic>Homicide - psychology</topic><topic>Human</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Individualism</topic><topic>Insanity Defense</topic><topic>Law</topic><topic>Law and Psychology</topic><topic>Law schools</topic><topic>Laws</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Mental Disorders</topic><topic>Mental Disorders - psychology</topic><topic>Mental Disorders - rehabilitation</topic><topic>Mental health</topic><topic>Mental Illness</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Models, Psychological</topic><topic>Original Article</topic><topic>Outcome and Process Assessment (Health Care)</topic><topic>Outpatient care facilities</topic><topic>Outpatient Commitment</topic><topic>Outpatient Treatment</topic><topic>Patient Compliance - psychology</topic><topic>Personality and Social Psychology</topic><topic>Politics</topic><topic>Prisoners - legislation & jurisprudence</topic><topic>Prisoners - psychology</topic><topic>Psychology</topic><topic>Public Health</topic><topic>Public Opinion</topic><topic>Public Policy</topic><topic>Public Policy - legislation & jurisprudence</topic><topic>Safety</topic><topic>Schizophrenia</topic><topic>Schizophrenia - diagnosis</topic><topic>Schizophrenia - rehabilitation</topic><topic>Social Identification</topic><topic>Social Values</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Substance abuse treatment</topic><topic>World view</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kahan, Dan M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Braman, Donald</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Monahan, John</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Callahan, Lisa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Peters, Ellen</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Criminal Justice Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>Criminology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Criminal Justice (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>ProQuest Criminal Justice</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Psychology</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Research Library China</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>APA PsycArticles®</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Law and human behavior</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kahan, Dan M</au><au>Braman, Donald</au><au>Monahan, John</au><au>Callahan, Lisa</au><au>Peters, Ellen</au><au>Cutler, Brian</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Cultural Cognition and Public Policy: The Case of Outpatient Commitment Laws</atitle><jtitle>Law and human behavior</jtitle><stitle>Law Hum Behav</stitle><addtitle>Law Hum Behav</addtitle><date>2010-04-01</date><risdate>2010</risdate><volume>34</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>118</spage><epage>140</epage><pages>118-140</pages><issn>0147-7307</issn><eissn>1573-661X</eissn><coden>LHBEDM</coden><abstract>What explains controversy over outpatient commitment laws (OCLs), which authorize courts to order persons with mental illness to accept outpatient treatment? We hypothesized that attitudes toward OCLs reflect "cultural cognition" (
DiMaggio, P. Annl Rev Sociol 23:263- 287, 1997
), which motivates individuals to conform their beliefs about policy-relevant facts to their cultural values. In a study involving a diverse sample of Americans (N = 1,496), we found that individuals who are hierarchical and communitarian tend to support OCLs, while those who are egalitarian and individualistic tend to oppose them. These relationships, moreover, fit the cultural cognition hypothesis: that is, rather than directly influencing OCL support, cultural values, mediated by affect, shaped individuals' perceptions of how effectively OCLs promote public health and safety. We discuss the implications for informed public deliberation over OCLs.</abstract><cop>Boston</cop><pub>Springer</pub><pmid>19169799</pmid><doi>10.1007/s10979-008-9174-4</doi><tpages>23</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0147-7307 |
| ispartof | Law and human behavior, 2010-04, Vol.34 (2), p.118-140 |
| issn | 0147-7307 1573-661X |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_902077288 |
| source | APA PsycARTICLES; MEDLINE; Worldwide Political Science Abstracts; HeinOnline Law Journal Library; SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings; EBSCOhost Business Source Complete |
| subjects | Adult Ambulatory Care - legislation & jurisprudence Attitudes Behavioral Science and Psychology Coercion Cognition Cognition & reasoning Cognitive models Cognitive therapy Commitment of Mentally Ill - legislation & jurisprudence Commitments Community and Environmental Psychology Community Mental Health Services - legislation & jurisprudence Courts Criminology and Criminal Justice Cultural Values Female Government Policy Making Homicide - legislation & jurisprudence Homicide - psychology Human Humans Individualism Insanity Defense Law Law and Psychology Law schools Laws Male Mental Disorders Mental Disorders - psychology Mental Disorders - rehabilitation Mental health Mental Illness Middle Aged Models, Psychological Original Article Outcome and Process Assessment (Health Care) Outpatient care facilities Outpatient Commitment Outpatient Treatment Patient Compliance - psychology Personality and Social Psychology Politics Prisoners - legislation & jurisprudence Prisoners - psychology Psychology Public Health Public Opinion Public Policy Public Policy - legislation & jurisprudence Safety Schizophrenia Schizophrenia - diagnosis Schizophrenia - rehabilitation Social Identification Social Values Studies Substance abuse treatment World view |
| title | Cultural Cognition and Public Policy: The Case of Outpatient Commitment Laws |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-04T02%3A09%3A03IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Cultural%20Cognition%20and%20Public%20Policy:%20The%20Case%20of%20Outpatient%20Commitment%20Laws&rft.jtitle=Law%20and%20human%20behavior&rft.au=Kahan,%20Dan%20M&rft.date=2010-04-01&rft.volume=34&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=118&rft.epage=140&rft.pages=118-140&rft.issn=0147-7307&rft.eissn=1573-661X&rft.coden=LHBEDM&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10979-008-9174-4&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E40608124%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=204160166&rft_id=info:pmid/19169799&rft_jstor_id=40608124&rfr_iscdi=true |