Q-measures and betweenness centrality in a collaboration network: a case study of the field of informetrics

We study global and local Q-measures, as well as betweenness centrality, as indicators of international collaboration in research. After a brief review of their definitions, we introduce the concepts of external and internal inter-group geodesics. These concepts are applied to a collaboration networ...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Scientometrics 2011-04, Vol.87 (1), p.133-147
Hauptverfasser: Guns, Raf, Liu, Yu Xian, Mahbuba, Dilruba
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 147
container_issue 1
container_start_page 133
container_title Scientometrics
container_volume 87
creator Guns, Raf
Liu, Yu Xian
Mahbuba, Dilruba
description We study global and local Q-measures, as well as betweenness centrality, as indicators of international collaboration in research. After a brief review of their definitions, we introduce the concepts of external and internal inter-group geodesics. These concepts are applied to a collaboration network of 1129 researchers from different countries, which is based on publications in bibliometrics, informetrics, webometrics, and scientometrics (BIWS in short) from the period 1990–2009. It is thus illustrated how international collaboration (among authors from different countries) in BIWS is carried out. Our results suggest that average scores for local Q-measures are typically higher, indicating a relatively low degree of international collaboration in BIWS. The dominating form of international collaboration is bilateral, whereas multilateral collaboration is relatively rare in the field of BIWS. We also identify and visualize the most important global and local actors. Dividing the entire period in four 5-year periods, it is found that most international collaboration in the field has happened in the last time slice (2005–2009). A comparison of the different time slices reveals the non-linear growth of the indicators studied and the international expansion of the field.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s11192-010-0332-3
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_902065077</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>902065077</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c393t-15033462ca93a317c3eca368e4777017f6efcda1e863cb7e671c1e02aaa131923</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE1LJDEQhoMoOH78AG-5LJ7ipjozne69ibjrwsAi6DnUZKo12pNoKo3MvzfDiMc9haKe9yX1CHEB-gq0tj8ZAPpGadBKG9MocyBmsOg61XQtHIqZBtOpHow-FifML7pmjO5m4vVebQh5ysQS41quqHwQxUjM0lMsGcdQtjJEidKnccRVylhCijJWMuXXX7sFMkku03or0yDLM8kh0LjeDSEOKW-o5OD5TBwNODKdf72n4vH37cPNnVr--_P35nqpvOlNUbCoF8zbxmNv0ID1hjyatqO5tVaDHVoa_BqButb4laXWggfSDSKCqRLMqbjc977l9D4RF7cJ7Kl-PlKa2PW60e1CW1tJ2JM-J-ZMg3vLYYN560C7nVe39-qqV7fz6kzN_PhqR_Y4DhmjD_wdbObQ99V85Zo9x3UVnyi7lzTlWA__T_knD5OIgA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>902065077</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Q-measures and betweenness centrality in a collaboration network: a case study of the field of informetrics</title><source>SpringerLink Journals</source><creator>Guns, Raf ; Liu, Yu Xian ; Mahbuba, Dilruba</creator><creatorcontrib>Guns, Raf ; Liu, Yu Xian ; Mahbuba, Dilruba</creatorcontrib><description>We study global and local Q-measures, as well as betweenness centrality, as indicators of international collaboration in research. After a brief review of their definitions, we introduce the concepts of external and internal inter-group geodesics. These concepts are applied to a collaboration network of 1129 researchers from different countries, which is based on publications in bibliometrics, informetrics, webometrics, and scientometrics (BIWS in short) from the period 1990–2009. It is thus illustrated how international collaboration (among authors from different countries) in BIWS is carried out. Our results suggest that average scores for local Q-measures are typically higher, indicating a relatively low degree of international collaboration in BIWS. The dominating form of international collaboration is bilateral, whereas multilateral collaboration is relatively rare in the field of BIWS. We also identify and visualize the most important global and local actors. Dividing the entire period in four 5-year periods, it is found that most international collaboration in the field has happened in the last time slice (2005–2009). A comparison of the different time slices reveals the non-linear growth of the indicators studied and the international expansion of the field.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0138-9130</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1588-2861</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s11192-010-0332-3</identifier><identifier>CODEN: SCNTDX</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands</publisher><subject>Bibliometrics. Scientometrics ; Bibliometrics. Scientometrics. Evaluation ; Computer Science ; Exact sciences and technology ; Information and communication sciences ; Information science. Documentation ; Information Storage and Retrieval ; Informetrics ; International co authorship ; Library and information science. General aspects ; Library Science ; Methods ; Scholarly publishing ; Sciences and techniques of general use</subject><ispartof>Scientometrics, 2011-04, Vol.87 (1), p.133-147</ispartof><rights>Akadémiai Kiadó, Budapest, Hungary 2010</rights><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c393t-15033462ca93a317c3eca368e4777017f6efcda1e863cb7e671c1e02aaa131923</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c393t-15033462ca93a317c3eca368e4777017f6efcda1e863cb7e671c1e02aaa131923</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s11192-010-0332-3$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11192-010-0332-3$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902,41464,42533,51294</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=24199158$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Guns, Raf</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liu, Yu Xian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mahbuba, Dilruba</creatorcontrib><title>Q-measures and betweenness centrality in a collaboration network: a case study of the field of informetrics</title><title>Scientometrics</title><addtitle>Scientometrics</addtitle><description>We study global and local Q-measures, as well as betweenness centrality, as indicators of international collaboration in research. After a brief review of their definitions, we introduce the concepts of external and internal inter-group geodesics. These concepts are applied to a collaboration network of 1129 researchers from different countries, which is based on publications in bibliometrics, informetrics, webometrics, and scientometrics (BIWS in short) from the period 1990–2009. It is thus illustrated how international collaboration (among authors from different countries) in BIWS is carried out. Our results suggest that average scores for local Q-measures are typically higher, indicating a relatively low degree of international collaboration in BIWS. The dominating form of international collaboration is bilateral, whereas multilateral collaboration is relatively rare in the field of BIWS. We also identify and visualize the most important global and local actors. Dividing the entire period in four 5-year periods, it is found that most international collaboration in the field has happened in the last time slice (2005–2009). A comparison of the different time slices reveals the non-linear growth of the indicators studied and the international expansion of the field.</description><subject>Bibliometrics. Scientometrics</subject><subject>Bibliometrics. Scientometrics. Evaluation</subject><subject>Computer Science</subject><subject>Exact sciences and technology</subject><subject>Information and communication sciences</subject><subject>Information science. Documentation</subject><subject>Information Storage and Retrieval</subject><subject>Informetrics</subject><subject>International co authorship</subject><subject>Library and information science. General aspects</subject><subject>Library Science</subject><subject>Methods</subject><subject>Scholarly publishing</subject><subject>Sciences and techniques of general use</subject><issn>0138-9130</issn><issn>1588-2861</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2011</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kE1LJDEQhoMoOH78AG-5LJ7ipjozne69ibjrwsAi6DnUZKo12pNoKo3MvzfDiMc9haKe9yX1CHEB-gq0tj8ZAPpGadBKG9MocyBmsOg61XQtHIqZBtOpHow-FifML7pmjO5m4vVebQh5ysQS41quqHwQxUjM0lMsGcdQtjJEidKnccRVylhCijJWMuXXX7sFMkku03or0yDLM8kh0LjeDSEOKW-o5OD5TBwNODKdf72n4vH37cPNnVr--_P35nqpvOlNUbCoF8zbxmNv0ID1hjyatqO5tVaDHVoa_BqButb4laXWggfSDSKCqRLMqbjc977l9D4RF7cJ7Kl-PlKa2PW60e1CW1tJ2JM-J-ZMg3vLYYN560C7nVe39-qqV7fz6kzN_PhqR_Y4DhmjD_wdbObQ99V85Zo9x3UVnyi7lzTlWA__T_knD5OIgA</recordid><startdate>20110401</startdate><enddate>20110401</enddate><creator>Guns, Raf</creator><creator>Liu, Yu Xian</creator><creator>Mahbuba, Dilruba</creator><general>Springer Netherlands</general><general>Springer</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>E3H</scope><scope>F2A</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20110401</creationdate><title>Q-measures and betweenness centrality in a collaboration network: a case study of the field of informetrics</title><author>Guns, Raf ; Liu, Yu Xian ; Mahbuba, Dilruba</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c393t-15033462ca93a317c3eca368e4777017f6efcda1e863cb7e671c1e02aaa131923</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2011</creationdate><topic>Bibliometrics. Scientometrics</topic><topic>Bibliometrics. Scientometrics. Evaluation</topic><topic>Computer Science</topic><topic>Exact sciences and technology</topic><topic>Information and communication sciences</topic><topic>Information science. Documentation</topic><topic>Information Storage and Retrieval</topic><topic>Informetrics</topic><topic>International co authorship</topic><topic>Library and information science. General aspects</topic><topic>Library Science</topic><topic>Methods</topic><topic>Scholarly publishing</topic><topic>Sciences and techniques of general use</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Guns, Raf</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liu, Yu Xian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mahbuba, Dilruba</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Library &amp; Information Sciences Abstracts (LISA)</collection><collection>Library &amp; Information Science Abstracts (LISA)</collection><jtitle>Scientometrics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Guns, Raf</au><au>Liu, Yu Xian</au><au>Mahbuba, Dilruba</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Q-measures and betweenness centrality in a collaboration network: a case study of the field of informetrics</atitle><jtitle>Scientometrics</jtitle><stitle>Scientometrics</stitle><date>2011-04-01</date><risdate>2011</risdate><volume>87</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>133</spage><epage>147</epage><pages>133-147</pages><issn>0138-9130</issn><eissn>1588-2861</eissn><coden>SCNTDX</coden><abstract>We study global and local Q-measures, as well as betweenness centrality, as indicators of international collaboration in research. After a brief review of their definitions, we introduce the concepts of external and internal inter-group geodesics. These concepts are applied to a collaboration network of 1129 researchers from different countries, which is based on publications in bibliometrics, informetrics, webometrics, and scientometrics (BIWS in short) from the period 1990–2009. It is thus illustrated how international collaboration (among authors from different countries) in BIWS is carried out. Our results suggest that average scores for local Q-measures are typically higher, indicating a relatively low degree of international collaboration in BIWS. The dominating form of international collaboration is bilateral, whereas multilateral collaboration is relatively rare in the field of BIWS. We also identify and visualize the most important global and local actors. Dividing the entire period in four 5-year periods, it is found that most international collaboration in the field has happened in the last time slice (2005–2009). A comparison of the different time slices reveals the non-linear growth of the indicators studied and the international expansion of the field.</abstract><cop>Dordrecht</cop><pub>Springer Netherlands</pub><doi>10.1007/s11192-010-0332-3</doi><tpages>15</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0138-9130
ispartof Scientometrics, 2011-04, Vol.87 (1), p.133-147
issn 0138-9130
1588-2861
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_902065077
source SpringerLink Journals
subjects Bibliometrics. Scientometrics
Bibliometrics. Scientometrics. Evaluation
Computer Science
Exact sciences and technology
Information and communication sciences
Information science. Documentation
Information Storage and Retrieval
Informetrics
International co authorship
Library and information science. General aspects
Library Science
Methods
Scholarly publishing
Sciences and techniques of general use
title Q-measures and betweenness centrality in a collaboration network: a case study of the field of informetrics
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-16T01%3A06%3A24IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Q-measures%20and%20betweenness%20centrality%20in%20a%20collaboration%20network:%20a%20case%20study%20of%20the%20field%20of%20informetrics&rft.jtitle=Scientometrics&rft.au=Guns,%20Raf&rft.date=2011-04-01&rft.volume=87&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=133&rft.epage=147&rft.pages=133-147&rft.issn=0138-9130&rft.eissn=1588-2861&rft.coden=SCNTDX&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s11192-010-0332-3&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E902065077%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=902065077&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true