Can we Rate Public Support for Democracy in a Comparable Way? Cross-National Equivalence of Democratic Attitudes in the World Value Survey

In this study we examine the cross-cultural equivalence of two scales that measure attitudes toward democracy across 36 countries in the World Value Survey (WVS) 2000. We examine the equivalence of these scales in order to explore if we can meaningfully compare democratic attitudes across countries....

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Social indicators research 2011-11, Vol.104 (2), p.271-286
Hauptverfasser: Ariely, Gal, Davidov, Eldad
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 286
container_issue 2
container_start_page 271
container_title Social indicators research
container_volume 104
creator Ariely, Gal
Davidov, Eldad
description In this study we examine the cross-cultural equivalence of two scales that measure attitudes toward democracy across 36 countries in the World Value Survey (WVS) 2000. We examine the equivalence of these scales in order to explore if we can meaningfully compare democratic attitudes across countries. Multiple group confirmatory factor analyses (MGCFA) is applied to answer this question. The analyses indicate that the scales may be compared but only to a certain extent and not across all the countries. We close this article by discussing the implications of the findings.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s11205-010-9693-5
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_901184407</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ericid>EJ941486</ericid><jstor_id>41476601</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>41476601</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c627t-f2d24a2ca7b899dafa798f5d6e12f32fb26629c1cf10ed3b14760c1e6d5f5f1d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkVuL1TAUhYsoeBz9AYJCEERfqtm5tM3TMNTjjUHF62PZTRPtoafpJOnI-Qv-alM6HsGHwac8rG-tHdbKsvtAnwGl5fMAwKjMKdBcFYrn8ka2AVnynCoGN7MN5ZTnFaf0dnYnhB2lVAopNtmvGkfy05CPGA35MLdDr8mneZqcj8Q6T16YvdMe9YH0I0FSu_2EHtvBkG94OCW1dyHk7zD2bsSBbC_m_hIHM2pDnP1jjinzLMY-zp0JS078kezODx35isNs0kF_aQ53s1sWh2DuXb0n2ZeX28_16_z8_as39dl5rgtWxtyyjglkGsu2UqpDi6WqrOwKA8xyZltWFExp0Bao6XgLoiyoBlN00koLHT_Jnqy5k3cXswmx2fdBm2HA0bg5NIoCVELQMpFPryWBM1ZCoRT_TxRKsaQ--gfdudmn-kJTKVExJkWVIFghvTTsjW0m3-_RHxqgzbJ4sy7epMWbZfFGJs_jq2AMGgfrcdR9OBqZkKUSHBL3YOWM7_VR3r5VAkRVJJmtckjS-N34v_-77vbD1bQL0fljqFjaLyjw37hbzUw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>894822548</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Can we Rate Public Support for Democracy in a Comparable Way? Cross-National Equivalence of Democratic Attitudes in the World Value Survey</title><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><source>Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals</source><source>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</source><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><creator>Ariely, Gal ; Davidov, Eldad</creator><creatorcontrib>Ariely, Gal ; Davidov, Eldad</creatorcontrib><description>In this study we examine the cross-cultural equivalence of two scales that measure attitudes toward democracy across 36 countries in the World Value Survey (WVS) 2000. We examine the equivalence of these scales in order to explore if we can meaningfully compare democratic attitudes across countries. Multiple group confirmatory factor analyses (MGCFA) is applied to answer this question. The analyses indicate that the scales may be compared but only to a certain extent and not across all the countries. We close this article by discussing the implications of the findings.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0303-8300</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-0921</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s11205-010-9693-5</identifier><identifier>CODEN: SINRDZ</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Dordrecht: Springer</publisher><subject>Attitude Measures ; Attitude surveys ; Attitudes ; Autocracy ; Comparative Analysis ; Cross Cultural Studies ; Cross-cultural analysis ; Crosscultural Differences ; Cultural Differences ; Democracy ; Factor Analysis ; Factor Structure ; History, theory and methodology ; Human Geography ; Item Analysis ; Measurement ; Measurement Techniques ; Measures (Individuals) ; Methodology ; Microeconomics ; Modeling ; Muslims ; National Surveys ; Political attitudes ; Political sociology ; Political systems ; Public Health ; Public Opinion ; Public opinion surveys ; Public Support ; Quality of Life Research ; Regression (Statistics) ; Sampling ; Scalars ; Scale analysis ; Self Efficacy ; Social Indicators ; Social research ; Social Sciences ; Social surveys ; Sociology ; State Surveys ; Studies ; Survey data ; Survey research ; Surveys ; Systems stability ; Translation ; Values</subject><ispartof>Social indicators research, 2011-11, Vol.104 (2), p.271-286</ispartof><rights>2011 Springer</rights><rights>Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2010</rights><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2011</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c627t-f2d24a2ca7b899dafa798f5d6e12f32fb26629c1cf10ed3b14760c1e6d5f5f1d3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c627t-f2d24a2ca7b899dafa798f5d6e12f32fb26629c1cf10ed3b14760c1e6d5f5f1d3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/41476601$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/41476601$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,799,27321,27901,27902,33751,33752,41464,42533,51294,57992,58225</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ941486$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=24579431$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ariely, Gal</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Davidov, Eldad</creatorcontrib><title>Can we Rate Public Support for Democracy in a Comparable Way? Cross-National Equivalence of Democratic Attitudes in the World Value Survey</title><title>Social indicators research</title><addtitle>Soc Indic Res</addtitle><description>In this study we examine the cross-cultural equivalence of two scales that measure attitudes toward democracy across 36 countries in the World Value Survey (WVS) 2000. We examine the equivalence of these scales in order to explore if we can meaningfully compare democratic attitudes across countries. Multiple group confirmatory factor analyses (MGCFA) is applied to answer this question. The analyses indicate that the scales may be compared but only to a certain extent and not across all the countries. We close this article by discussing the implications of the findings.</description><subject>Attitude Measures</subject><subject>Attitude surveys</subject><subject>Attitudes</subject><subject>Autocracy</subject><subject>Comparative Analysis</subject><subject>Cross Cultural Studies</subject><subject>Cross-cultural analysis</subject><subject>Crosscultural Differences</subject><subject>Cultural Differences</subject><subject>Democracy</subject><subject>Factor Analysis</subject><subject>Factor Structure</subject><subject>History, theory and methodology</subject><subject>Human Geography</subject><subject>Item Analysis</subject><subject>Measurement</subject><subject>Measurement Techniques</subject><subject>Measures (Individuals)</subject><subject>Methodology</subject><subject>Microeconomics</subject><subject>Modeling</subject><subject>Muslims</subject><subject>National Surveys</subject><subject>Political attitudes</subject><subject>Political sociology</subject><subject>Political systems</subject><subject>Public Health</subject><subject>Public Opinion</subject><subject>Public opinion surveys</subject><subject>Public Support</subject><subject>Quality of Life Research</subject><subject>Regression (Statistics)</subject><subject>Sampling</subject><subject>Scalars</subject><subject>Scale analysis</subject><subject>Self Efficacy</subject><subject>Social Indicators</subject><subject>Social research</subject><subject>Social Sciences</subject><subject>Social surveys</subject><subject>Sociology</subject><subject>State Surveys</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Survey data</subject><subject>Survey research</subject><subject>Surveys</subject><subject>Systems stability</subject><subject>Translation</subject><subject>Values</subject><issn>0303-8300</issn><issn>1573-0921</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2011</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><sourceid>7UB</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkVuL1TAUhYsoeBz9AYJCEERfqtm5tM3TMNTjjUHF62PZTRPtoafpJOnI-Qv-alM6HsGHwac8rG-tHdbKsvtAnwGl5fMAwKjMKdBcFYrn8ka2AVnynCoGN7MN5ZTnFaf0dnYnhB2lVAopNtmvGkfy05CPGA35MLdDr8mneZqcj8Q6T16YvdMe9YH0I0FSu_2EHtvBkG94OCW1dyHk7zD2bsSBbC_m_hIHM2pDnP1jjinzLMY-zp0JS078kezODx35isNs0kF_aQ53s1sWh2DuXb0n2ZeX28_16_z8_as39dl5rgtWxtyyjglkGsu2UqpDi6WqrOwKA8xyZltWFExp0Bao6XgLoiyoBlN00koLHT_Jnqy5k3cXswmx2fdBm2HA0bg5NIoCVELQMpFPryWBM1ZCoRT_TxRKsaQ--gfdudmn-kJTKVExJkWVIFghvTTsjW0m3-_RHxqgzbJ4sy7epMWbZfFGJs_jq2AMGgfrcdR9OBqZkKUSHBL3YOWM7_VR3r5VAkRVJJmtckjS-N34v_-77vbD1bQL0fljqFjaLyjw37hbzUw</recordid><startdate>20111101</startdate><enddate>20111101</enddate><creator>Ariely, Gal</creator><creator>Davidov, Eldad</creator><general>Springer</general><general>Springer Netherlands</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>7SW</scope><scope>BJH</scope><scope>BNH</scope><scope>BNI</scope><scope>BNJ</scope><scope>BNO</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>PET</scope><scope>REK</scope><scope>WWN</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7U4</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>88B</scope><scope>88C</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>88J</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>CJNVE</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HEHIP</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M0P</scope><scope>M0T</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2R</scope><scope>M2S</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEDU</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>WZK</scope><scope>7UB</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20111101</creationdate><title>Can we Rate Public Support for Democracy in a Comparable Way? Cross-National Equivalence of Democratic Attitudes in the World Value Survey</title><author>Ariely, Gal ; Davidov, Eldad</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c627t-f2d24a2ca7b899dafa798f5d6e12f32fb26629c1cf10ed3b14760c1e6d5f5f1d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2011</creationdate><topic>Attitude Measures</topic><topic>Attitude surveys</topic><topic>Attitudes</topic><topic>Autocracy</topic><topic>Comparative Analysis</topic><topic>Cross Cultural Studies</topic><topic>Cross-cultural analysis</topic><topic>Crosscultural Differences</topic><topic>Cultural Differences</topic><topic>Democracy</topic><topic>Factor Analysis</topic><topic>Factor Structure</topic><topic>History, theory and methodology</topic><topic>Human Geography</topic><topic>Item Analysis</topic><topic>Measurement</topic><topic>Measurement Techniques</topic><topic>Measures (Individuals)</topic><topic>Methodology</topic><topic>Microeconomics</topic><topic>Modeling</topic><topic>Muslims</topic><topic>National Surveys</topic><topic>Political attitudes</topic><topic>Political sociology</topic><topic>Political systems</topic><topic>Public Health</topic><topic>Public Opinion</topic><topic>Public opinion surveys</topic><topic>Public Support</topic><topic>Quality of Life Research</topic><topic>Regression (Statistics)</topic><topic>Sampling</topic><topic>Scalars</topic><topic>Scale analysis</topic><topic>Self Efficacy</topic><topic>Social Indicators</topic><topic>Social research</topic><topic>Social Sciences</topic><topic>Social surveys</topic><topic>Sociology</topic><topic>State Surveys</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Survey data</topic><topic>Survey research</topic><topic>Surveys</topic><topic>Systems stability</topic><topic>Translation</topic><topic>Values</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ariely, Gal</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Davidov, Eldad</creatorcontrib><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Ovid)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>ERIC( SilverPlatter )</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC PlusText (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>Education Resources Information Center (ERIC)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Education Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Social Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Education Collection</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>Sociology Collection</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>Education Database</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database</collection><collection>Psychology Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Social Science Database</collection><collection>Sociology Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>One Business (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Education</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><collection>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Social indicators research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ariely, Gal</au><au>Davidov, Eldad</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ941486</ericid><atitle>Can we Rate Public Support for Democracy in a Comparable Way? Cross-National Equivalence of Democratic Attitudes in the World Value Survey</atitle><jtitle>Social indicators research</jtitle><stitle>Soc Indic Res</stitle><date>2011-11-01</date><risdate>2011</risdate><volume>104</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>271</spage><epage>286</epage><pages>271-286</pages><issn>0303-8300</issn><eissn>1573-0921</eissn><coden>SINRDZ</coden><abstract>In this study we examine the cross-cultural equivalence of two scales that measure attitudes toward democracy across 36 countries in the World Value Survey (WVS) 2000. We examine the equivalence of these scales in order to explore if we can meaningfully compare democratic attitudes across countries. Multiple group confirmatory factor analyses (MGCFA) is applied to answer this question. The analyses indicate that the scales may be compared but only to a certain extent and not across all the countries. We close this article by discussing the implications of the findings.</abstract><cop>Dordrecht</cop><pub>Springer</pub><doi>10.1007/s11205-010-9693-5</doi><tpages>16</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0303-8300
ispartof Social indicators research, 2011-11, Vol.104 (2), p.271-286
issn 0303-8300
1573-0921
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_901184407
source Jstor Complete Legacy; Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals; Worldwide Political Science Abstracts; Sociological Abstracts
subjects Attitude Measures
Attitude surveys
Attitudes
Autocracy
Comparative Analysis
Cross Cultural Studies
Cross-cultural analysis
Crosscultural Differences
Cultural Differences
Democracy
Factor Analysis
Factor Structure
History, theory and methodology
Human Geography
Item Analysis
Measurement
Measurement Techniques
Measures (Individuals)
Methodology
Microeconomics
Modeling
Muslims
National Surveys
Political attitudes
Political sociology
Political systems
Public Health
Public Opinion
Public opinion surveys
Public Support
Quality of Life Research
Regression (Statistics)
Sampling
Scalars
Scale analysis
Self Efficacy
Social Indicators
Social research
Social Sciences
Social surveys
Sociology
State Surveys
Studies
Survey data
Survey research
Surveys
Systems stability
Translation
Values
title Can we Rate Public Support for Democracy in a Comparable Way? Cross-National Equivalence of Democratic Attitudes in the World Value Survey
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-12T11%3A25%3A34IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Can%20we%20Rate%20Public%20Support%20for%20Democracy%20in%20a%20Comparable%20Way?%20Cross-National%20Equivalence%20of%20Democratic%20Attitudes%20in%20the%20World%20Value%20Survey&rft.jtitle=Social%20indicators%20research&rft.au=Ariely,%20Gal&rft.date=2011-11-01&rft.volume=104&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=271&rft.epage=286&rft.pages=271-286&rft.issn=0303-8300&rft.eissn=1573-0921&rft.coden=SINRDZ&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s11205-010-9693-5&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E41476601%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=894822548&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ericid=EJ941486&rft_jstor_id=41476601&rfr_iscdi=true