Upper bonded retainers
To assess the frequency and type of upper bonded retainer failure and to identify possible predisposing factors. The records of 466 consecutive patients with upper bonded retainers were analyzed retrospectively with respect to retainer failures and failure type as well as timing of failure, differen...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | The Angle orthodontist 2011-11, Vol.81 (6), p.1050-1056 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 1056 |
---|---|
container_issue | 6 |
container_start_page | 1050 |
container_title | The Angle orthodontist |
container_volume | 81 |
creator | Schneider, Eva Ruf, Sabine |
description | To assess the frequency and type of upper bonded retainer failure and to identify possible predisposing factors.
The records of 466 consecutive patients with upper bonded retainers were analyzed retrospectively with respect to retainer failures and failure type as well as timing of failure, differences among operators, and the number of defects of the multibracket appliances (MB) prior to the retention period.
A total of 58.2% of all patients experienced retainer failures. The average failure odds were 1.26 failures per retainer. The odds were highest for 3-3 retainers (1.37) and lowest for the 1-1 retainer (0.54). The detachment and total loss rates were significantly influenced by operator experience-both rates were lower for experienced practitioners. Total retainer losses occurred more frequently in case of previous MB defects, while retainer fractures were seen more frequently when the retainer included the canines.
Upper bonded retainer failures are a frequent problem during the retention period (58.2% of patients). Less operator experience correlated with higher failure rates. An increased number of total retainer losses must also be expected with a decreasing number of bonding sites and in cases involving previous MB defects. |
doi_str_mv | 10.2319/022211-132.1 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_900628243</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>900628243</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1361-1346ebcfdf211d7dc50f4cb5d0b4df12213c703ecd323345ce51d052ef3db1383</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo1jztLA0EUhQdBTIx2YinprDbex8w-Sgm-IGBj6mVn5g6s7MuZbOG_N2KsTvNxvnOUukHYEGP1AESEmCHTBs_UEittsgKBF-oypU8AMkbThVoQ5qYoGZbqdj9NEtd2HLz4dZRD0w4S05U6D02X5PqUK7V_fvrYvma795e37eMuc8j5r0jnYl3w4aj1hXcGgnbWeLDaBzyOYVcAi_NMzNo4MejBkAT2Frnklbr_653i-DVLOtR9m5x0XTPIOKe6AsipJM1H8u5EzrYXX0-x7Zv4Xf9f4R_9JEX-</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>900628243</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Upper bonded retainers</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Schneider, Eva ; Ruf, Sabine</creator><creatorcontrib>Schneider, Eva ; Ruf, Sabine</creatorcontrib><description>To assess the frequency and type of upper bonded retainer failure and to identify possible predisposing factors.
The records of 466 consecutive patients with upper bonded retainers were analyzed retrospectively with respect to retainer failures and failure type as well as timing of failure, differences among operators, and the number of defects of the multibracket appliances (MB) prior to the retention period.
A total of 58.2% of all patients experienced retainer failures. The average failure odds were 1.26 failures per retainer. The odds were highest for 3-3 retainers (1.37) and lowest for the 1-1 retainer (0.54). The detachment and total loss rates were significantly influenced by operator experience-both rates were lower for experienced practitioners. Total retainer losses occurred more frequently in case of previous MB defects, while retainer fractures were seen more frequently when the retainer included the canines.
Upper bonded retainer failures are a frequent problem during the retention period (58.2% of patients). Less operator experience correlated with higher failure rates. An increased number of total retainer losses must also be expected with a decreasing number of bonding sites and in cases involving previous MB defects.</description><identifier>EISSN: 1945-7103</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.2319/022211-132.1</identifier><identifier>PMID: 21657830</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States</publisher><subject>Adolescent ; Analysis of Variance ; Child ; Clinical Competence ; Dental Bonding ; Equipment Failure ; Female ; Humans ; Kaplan-Meier Estimate ; Male ; Maxilla ; Orthodontic Brackets - adverse effects ; Orthodontic Retainers - adverse effects ; Retrospective Studies ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>The Angle orthodontist, 2011-11, Vol.81 (6), p.1050-1056</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1361-1346ebcfdf211d7dc50f4cb5d0b4df12213c703ecd323345ce51d052ef3db1383</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,864,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21657830$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Schneider, Eva</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ruf, Sabine</creatorcontrib><title>Upper bonded retainers</title><title>The Angle orthodontist</title><addtitle>Angle Orthod</addtitle><description>To assess the frequency and type of upper bonded retainer failure and to identify possible predisposing factors.
The records of 466 consecutive patients with upper bonded retainers were analyzed retrospectively with respect to retainer failures and failure type as well as timing of failure, differences among operators, and the number of defects of the multibracket appliances (MB) prior to the retention period.
A total of 58.2% of all patients experienced retainer failures. The average failure odds were 1.26 failures per retainer. The odds were highest for 3-3 retainers (1.37) and lowest for the 1-1 retainer (0.54). The detachment and total loss rates were significantly influenced by operator experience-both rates were lower for experienced practitioners. Total retainer losses occurred more frequently in case of previous MB defects, while retainer fractures were seen more frequently when the retainer included the canines.
Upper bonded retainer failures are a frequent problem during the retention period (58.2% of patients). Less operator experience correlated with higher failure rates. An increased number of total retainer losses must also be expected with a decreasing number of bonding sites and in cases involving previous MB defects.</description><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Analysis of Variance</subject><subject>Child</subject><subject>Clinical Competence</subject><subject>Dental Bonding</subject><subject>Equipment Failure</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Kaplan-Meier Estimate</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Maxilla</subject><subject>Orthodontic Brackets - adverse effects</subject><subject>Orthodontic Retainers - adverse effects</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>1945-7103</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2011</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNo1jztLA0EUhQdBTIx2YinprDbex8w-Sgm-IGBj6mVn5g6s7MuZbOG_N2KsTvNxvnOUukHYEGP1AESEmCHTBs_UEittsgKBF-oypU8AMkbThVoQ5qYoGZbqdj9NEtd2HLz4dZRD0w4S05U6D02X5PqUK7V_fvrYvma795e37eMuc8j5r0jnYl3w4aj1hXcGgnbWeLDaBzyOYVcAi_NMzNo4MejBkAT2Frnklbr_653i-DVLOtR9m5x0XTPIOKe6AsipJM1H8u5EzrYXX0-x7Zv4Xf9f4R_9JEX-</recordid><startdate>201111</startdate><enddate>201111</enddate><creator>Schneider, Eva</creator><creator>Ruf, Sabine</creator><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201111</creationdate><title>Upper bonded retainers</title><author>Schneider, Eva ; Ruf, Sabine</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1361-1346ebcfdf211d7dc50f4cb5d0b4df12213c703ecd323345ce51d052ef3db1383</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2011</creationdate><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Analysis of Variance</topic><topic>Child</topic><topic>Clinical Competence</topic><topic>Dental Bonding</topic><topic>Equipment Failure</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Kaplan-Meier Estimate</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Maxilla</topic><topic>Orthodontic Brackets - adverse effects</topic><topic>Orthodontic Retainers - adverse effects</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Schneider, Eva</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ruf, Sabine</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>The Angle orthodontist</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Schneider, Eva</au><au>Ruf, Sabine</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Upper bonded retainers</atitle><jtitle>The Angle orthodontist</jtitle><addtitle>Angle Orthod</addtitle><date>2011-11</date><risdate>2011</risdate><volume>81</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>1050</spage><epage>1056</epage><pages>1050-1056</pages><eissn>1945-7103</eissn><abstract>To assess the frequency and type of upper bonded retainer failure and to identify possible predisposing factors.
The records of 466 consecutive patients with upper bonded retainers were analyzed retrospectively with respect to retainer failures and failure type as well as timing of failure, differences among operators, and the number of defects of the multibracket appliances (MB) prior to the retention period.
A total of 58.2% of all patients experienced retainer failures. The average failure odds were 1.26 failures per retainer. The odds were highest for 3-3 retainers (1.37) and lowest for the 1-1 retainer (0.54). The detachment and total loss rates were significantly influenced by operator experience-both rates were lower for experienced practitioners. Total retainer losses occurred more frequently in case of previous MB defects, while retainer fractures were seen more frequently when the retainer included the canines.
Upper bonded retainer failures are a frequent problem during the retention period (58.2% of patients). Less operator experience correlated with higher failure rates. An increased number of total retainer losses must also be expected with a decreasing number of bonding sites and in cases involving previous MB defects.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pmid>21657830</pmid><doi>10.2319/022211-132.1</doi><tpages>7</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | EISSN: 1945-7103 |
ispartof | The Angle orthodontist, 2011-11, Vol.81 (6), p.1050-1056 |
issn | 1945-7103 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_900628243 |
source | MEDLINE; DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; PubMed Central |
subjects | Adolescent Analysis of Variance Child Clinical Competence Dental Bonding Equipment Failure Female Humans Kaplan-Meier Estimate Male Maxilla Orthodontic Brackets - adverse effects Orthodontic Retainers - adverse effects Retrospective Studies Young Adult |
title | Upper bonded retainers |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-02T20%3A42%3A16IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Upper%20bonded%20retainers&rft.jtitle=The%20Angle%20orthodontist&rft.au=Schneider,%20Eva&rft.date=2011-11&rft.volume=81&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=1050&rft.epage=1056&rft.pages=1050-1056&rft.eissn=1945-7103&rft_id=info:doi/10.2319/022211-132.1&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E900628243%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=900628243&rft_id=info:pmid/21657830&rfr_iscdi=true |