Public pension funding in practice
Public pension funding has recently become a front-burner policy issue in the wake of the financial crisis and given the pending retirement of large numbers of baby boomers. This paper examines the current funding of state and local pensions using a sample of 126 plans, estimating an aggregate funde...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of pension economics & finance 2011-04, Vol.10 (2), p.247-268 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 268 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 247 |
container_title | Journal of pension economics & finance |
container_volume | 10 |
creator | MUNNELL, ALICIA H. AUBRY, JEAN-PIERRE QUINBY, LAURA |
description | Public pension funding has recently become a front-burner policy issue in the wake of the financial crisis and given the pending retirement of large numbers of baby boomers. This paper examines the current funding of state and local pensions using a sample of 126 plans, estimating an aggregate funded ratio in 2009 of 78% using GASB accounting methods. Projections for 2010–2013 suggest that some continued deterioration is likely. Funded status can vary significantly among plans, and so the paper explores the influence of four types of factors: funding discipline, plan governance, plan characteristics, and the fiscal situation of the state. Judging the long-term health of plans requires more than just a snapshot of assets and liabilities, and so the paper examines how well plans are meeting their Annual Required Contributions and what factors influence whether they make them. The paper also addresses the controversy over what discount rate to use for valuing liabilities, concluding that using a riskless rate of return could help improve funding discipline but would need to be implemented in a manageable way. Finally, the paper assesses whether plans face a near-term liquidity crisis and finds that most have assets on hand to cover benefits over the next 15–20 years. The bottom line is that, like private investors, public plans have been hit hard by the financial crisis and their full recovery is dependent on the rebound of the economy and the stock market. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1017/S1474747211000126 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_899165648</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><cupid>10_1017_S1474747211000126</cupid><sourcerecordid>899165648</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c459t-4161a0b8e34b7aade27585571d6900f3e384589a5d90ad1c61f7578e5ccae3d63</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kE1LxDAQhoMouK7-AG9lL56qmXznKItfsKCgnkOapEuWbluT9uC_t-suCIrMYYaZ530ZXoQuAV8DBnnzCkzuigBgjIGIIzSbVrykmJDj75mVu_spOst5gzEBRvQMLV7Gqomu6EObY9cW9dj62K6L2BZ9sm6ILpyjk9o2OVwc-hy939-9LR_L1fPD0_J2VTrG9VAyEGBxpQJllbTWByK54lyCFxrjmgaqGFfacq-x9eAE1JJLFbhzNlAv6Bxd7X371H2MIQ9mG7MLTWPb0I3ZKK1BcMHURC5-kZtuTO30nFECJkAxOkGwh1zqck6hNn2KW5s-DWCzy8z8yWzS0IPGbqsU_Tr8OP-v-gIWRWsm</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>861483843</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Public pension funding in practice</title><source>PAIS Index</source><source>Cambridge Journals Online Full Collection - JUSTICE</source><creator>MUNNELL, ALICIA H. ; AUBRY, JEAN-PIERRE ; QUINBY, LAURA</creator><creatorcontrib>MUNNELL, ALICIA H. ; AUBRY, JEAN-PIERRE ; QUINBY, LAURA</creatorcontrib><description>Public pension funding has recently become a front-burner policy issue in the wake of the financial crisis and given the pending retirement of large numbers of baby boomers. This paper examines the current funding of state and local pensions using a sample of 126 plans, estimating an aggregate funded ratio in 2009 of 78% using GASB accounting methods. Projections for 2010–2013 suggest that some continued deterioration is likely. Funded status can vary significantly among plans, and so the paper explores the influence of four types of factors: funding discipline, plan governance, plan characteristics, and the fiscal situation of the state. Judging the long-term health of plans requires more than just a snapshot of assets and liabilities, and so the paper examines how well plans are meeting their Annual Required Contributions and what factors influence whether they make them. The paper also addresses the controversy over what discount rate to use for valuing liabilities, concluding that using a riskless rate of return could help improve funding discipline but would need to be implemented in a manageable way. Finally, the paper assesses whether plans face a near-term liquidity crisis and finds that most have assets on hand to cover benefits over the next 15–20 years. The bottom line is that, like private investors, public plans have been hit hard by the financial crisis and their full recovery is dependent on the rebound of the economy and the stock market.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1474-7472</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1475-3022</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1017/S1474747211000126</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press</publisher><subject>Accounting ; Accounting standards ; Actuaries ; Baby boomers ; Costs ; Employees ; Funding ; Liability ; Liquidity ; Methods ; Pension costs ; Pension plan funding ; Public sector ; Ratios ; Regulation ; Retirement ; Securities markets ; Studies ; Wages & salaries</subject><ispartof>Journal of pension economics & finance, 2011-04, Vol.10 (2), p.247-268</ispartof><rights>Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2011</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c459t-4161a0b8e34b7aade27585571d6900f3e384589a5d90ad1c61f7578e5ccae3d63</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c459t-4161a0b8e34b7aade27585571d6900f3e384589a5d90ad1c61f7578e5ccae3d63</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S1474747211000126/type/journal_article$$EHTML$$P50$$Gcambridge$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>164,314,780,784,27866,27924,27925,55628</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>MUNNELL, ALICIA H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>AUBRY, JEAN-PIERRE</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>QUINBY, LAURA</creatorcontrib><title>Public pension funding in practice</title><title>Journal of pension economics & finance</title><description>Public pension funding has recently become a front-burner policy issue in the wake of the financial crisis and given the pending retirement of large numbers of baby boomers. This paper examines the current funding of state and local pensions using a sample of 126 plans, estimating an aggregate funded ratio in 2009 of 78% using GASB accounting methods. Projections for 2010–2013 suggest that some continued deterioration is likely. Funded status can vary significantly among plans, and so the paper explores the influence of four types of factors: funding discipline, plan governance, plan characteristics, and the fiscal situation of the state. Judging the long-term health of plans requires more than just a snapshot of assets and liabilities, and so the paper examines how well plans are meeting their Annual Required Contributions and what factors influence whether they make them. The paper also addresses the controversy over what discount rate to use for valuing liabilities, concluding that using a riskless rate of return could help improve funding discipline but would need to be implemented in a manageable way. Finally, the paper assesses whether plans face a near-term liquidity crisis and finds that most have assets on hand to cover benefits over the next 15–20 years. The bottom line is that, like private investors, public plans have been hit hard by the financial crisis and their full recovery is dependent on the rebound of the economy and the stock market.</description><subject>Accounting</subject><subject>Accounting standards</subject><subject>Actuaries</subject><subject>Baby boomers</subject><subject>Costs</subject><subject>Employees</subject><subject>Funding</subject><subject>Liability</subject><subject>Liquidity</subject><subject>Methods</subject><subject>Pension costs</subject><subject>Pension plan funding</subject><subject>Public sector</subject><subject>Ratios</subject><subject>Regulation</subject><subject>Retirement</subject><subject>Securities markets</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Wages & salaries</subject><issn>1474-7472</issn><issn>1475-3022</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2011</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7TQ</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kE1LxDAQhoMouK7-AG9lL56qmXznKItfsKCgnkOapEuWbluT9uC_t-suCIrMYYaZ530ZXoQuAV8DBnnzCkzuigBgjIGIIzSbVrykmJDj75mVu_spOst5gzEBRvQMLV7Gqomu6EObY9cW9dj62K6L2BZ9sm6ILpyjk9o2OVwc-hy939-9LR_L1fPD0_J2VTrG9VAyEGBxpQJllbTWByK54lyCFxrjmgaqGFfacq-x9eAE1JJLFbhzNlAv6Bxd7X371H2MIQ9mG7MLTWPb0I3ZKK1BcMHURC5-kZtuTO30nFECJkAxOkGwh1zqck6hNn2KW5s-DWCzy8z8yWzS0IPGbqsU_Tr8OP-v-gIWRWsm</recordid><startdate>20110401</startdate><enddate>20110401</enddate><creator>MUNNELL, ALICIA H.</creator><creator>AUBRY, JEAN-PIERRE</creator><creator>QUINBY, LAURA</creator><general>Cambridge University Press</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7TQ</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DHY</scope><scope>DON</scope><scope>DPSOV</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>KC-</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M2L</scope><scope>M2R</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7U1</scope><scope>7U2</scope><scope>C1K</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20110401</creationdate><title>Public pension funding in practice</title><author>MUNNELL, ALICIA H. ; AUBRY, JEAN-PIERRE ; QUINBY, LAURA</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c459t-4161a0b8e34b7aade27585571d6900f3e384589a5d90ad1c61f7578e5ccae3d63</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2011</creationdate><topic>Accounting</topic><topic>Accounting standards</topic><topic>Actuaries</topic><topic>Baby boomers</topic><topic>Costs</topic><topic>Employees</topic><topic>Funding</topic><topic>Liability</topic><topic>Liquidity</topic><topic>Methods</topic><topic>Pension costs</topic><topic>Pension plan funding</topic><topic>Public sector</topic><topic>Ratios</topic><topic>Regulation</topic><topic>Retirement</topic><topic>Securities markets</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Wages & salaries</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>MUNNELL, ALICIA H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>AUBRY, JEAN-PIERRE</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>QUINBY, LAURA</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection【Remote access available】</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>PAIS Index</collection><collection>ABI-INFORM Complete</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>PAIS International</collection><collection>PAIS International (Ovid)</collection><collection>Politics Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Politics Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM global</collection><collection>Political Science Database</collection><collection>Social Science Database (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Risk Abstracts</collection><collection>Safety Science and Risk</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><jtitle>Journal of pension economics & finance</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>MUNNELL, ALICIA H.</au><au>AUBRY, JEAN-PIERRE</au><au>QUINBY, LAURA</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Public pension funding in practice</atitle><jtitle>Journal of pension economics & finance</jtitle><date>2011-04-01</date><risdate>2011</risdate><volume>10</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>247</spage><epage>268</epage><pages>247-268</pages><issn>1474-7472</issn><eissn>1475-3022</eissn><abstract>Public pension funding has recently become a front-burner policy issue in the wake of the financial crisis and given the pending retirement of large numbers of baby boomers. This paper examines the current funding of state and local pensions using a sample of 126 plans, estimating an aggregate funded ratio in 2009 of 78% using GASB accounting methods. Projections for 2010–2013 suggest that some continued deterioration is likely. Funded status can vary significantly among plans, and so the paper explores the influence of four types of factors: funding discipline, plan governance, plan characteristics, and the fiscal situation of the state. Judging the long-term health of plans requires more than just a snapshot of assets and liabilities, and so the paper examines how well plans are meeting their Annual Required Contributions and what factors influence whether they make them. The paper also addresses the controversy over what discount rate to use for valuing liabilities, concluding that using a riskless rate of return could help improve funding discipline but would need to be implemented in a manageable way. Finally, the paper assesses whether plans face a near-term liquidity crisis and finds that most have assets on hand to cover benefits over the next 15–20 years. The bottom line is that, like private investors, public plans have been hit hard by the financial crisis and their full recovery is dependent on the rebound of the economy and the stock market.</abstract><cop>Cambridge, UK</cop><pub>Cambridge University Press</pub><doi>10.1017/S1474747211000126</doi><tpages>22</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1474-7472 |
ispartof | Journal of pension economics & finance, 2011-04, Vol.10 (2), p.247-268 |
issn | 1474-7472 1475-3022 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_899165648 |
source | PAIS Index; Cambridge Journals Online Full Collection - JUSTICE |
subjects | Accounting Accounting standards Actuaries Baby boomers Costs Employees Funding Liability Liquidity Methods Pension costs Pension plan funding Public sector Ratios Regulation Retirement Securities markets Studies Wages & salaries |
title | Public pension funding in practice |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-01T06%3A41%3A39IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Public%20pension%20funding%20in%20practice&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20pension%20economics%20&%20finance&rft.au=MUNNELL,%20ALICIA%20H.&rft.date=2011-04-01&rft.volume=10&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=247&rft.epage=268&rft.pages=247-268&rft.issn=1474-7472&rft.eissn=1475-3022&rft_id=info:doi/10.1017/S1474747211000126&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E899165648%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=861483843&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_cupid=10_1017_S1474747211000126&rfr_iscdi=true |