A whole farm systems analysis of greenhouse gas emissions of 60 Tasmanian dairy farms

The Australian dairy industry contributes ∼1.6% of the nation's greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, emitting an estimated 8.9 million tonnes of CO2 equivalents (tCO2e)/annum (DCC, 2008). This study examined GHG emissions of 60 Tasmanian dairy farms using the Dairy Greenhouse gas Abatement Strategie...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Animal feed science and technology 2011-06, Vol.166-167, p.653-662
Hauptverfasser: Christie, K.M., Rawnsley, R.P., Eckard, R.J.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 662
container_issue
container_start_page 653
container_title Animal feed science and technology
container_volume 166-167
creator Christie, K.M.
Rawnsley, R.P.
Eckard, R.J.
description The Australian dairy industry contributes ∼1.6% of the nation's greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, emitting an estimated 8.9 million tonnes of CO2 equivalents (tCO2e)/annum (DCC, 2008). This study examined GHG emissions of 60 Tasmanian dairy farms using the Dairy Greenhouse gas Abatement Strategies (DGAS) calculator, which incorporates International Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) and Australian inventory methodologies, algorithms and emission factors. Sources of GHG emissions including pre-farm embedded emissions associated with key farm inputs (i.e., grains/concentrates, forages and fertilizers) and on-farm emissions from CO2, CH4 and N2O are estimated by DGAS software. A detailed description of GHG calculations and functionality of DGAS software are provided. Total farm GHG emissions of 60 Tasmanian dairy farms, as estimated with DGAS, ranged between 704 and 5839tCO2e/annum, with a mean of 2811tCO2e/annum. Linear regression analyses showed that 0.93 of the difference in total farm GHG emission was explained by milk production. The estimated mean GHG emission intensity of milk of production was 1.04kgCO2e/kg fat and protein corrected milk (FPCM; ranged between 0.83 and 1.39tCO2e/tFPCM) with a standard deviation of 0.13. Stepwise multiple linear regression analysis showed that feed conversion efficiency (kgFPCM/kgdry matter (DM) intake) and N based fertilizer application rate explained 0.60 of the difference in the GHG emissions due to milk production from these pastoral based dairy systems. Estimated per cow and per hectare emission intensity was 6.9±1.46tCO2e/cow and 12.6±4.37tCO2e/ha, respectively. Stepwise multiple linear regression analysis showed that DM intake per cow (tDM intake/cow/lactation) explained 0.86 of the variability in per cow GHG emissions intensity, while milk production/hectare (tFPCM/ha) explained 0.92 of the variability in per hectare GHG emission intensity. Given the influence that feed conversion efficiency and/or N based fertilizer application rates had on all GHG emissions intensities, it is clear that these factors should be key target areas to lower the intensity of emissions associated with dairying in Tasmania. This paper is part of the special issue entitled: Greenhouse Gases in Animal Agriculture – Finding a Balance between Food and Emissions, Guest Edited by T.A. McAllister, Section Guest Editors: K.A. Beauchemin, X. Hao, S. McGinn and Editor for Animal Feed Science and Technology, P.H. Robinson.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2011.04.046
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_899147891</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0377840111001659</els_id><sourcerecordid>899147891</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c404t-6ce5d8210e42ecbc66c9233867cd29c76b286877f74ad7a6a9d50188283d09553</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkE1rGzEQhkVIIY7b31BdSk_rSFqtpD26ofkAQw-1z2IizToy-5FqnBb_-8qxSY-FAR30zDsvD2NcioUU0tzsFjCmDjFSSAslpFwIXcZcsJl0tq6UkuaSzURtbeW0kFfsmmgnhFSuVjO2WfI_z1OPvIM8cDrQHgfiMEJ_oER86vg2I47P0ysh3wJxHBJRmsa3PyP4GmgoDWDkEVI-vOXQR_ahg57w0_mds83d9_XtQ7X6cf94u1xVQQu9r0zAJjolBWqF4SkYE1pV187YEFUbrHlSzjhrO6shWjDQxkZI50r1KNqmqefs6yn3JU-_XpH2vrQL2PcwYmnsXdtKbV0rC-lOZMgTUcbOv-Q0QD54KfxRpN_5fyL9UaQXuowpq1_OR4AC9F2GMSR631e6LiYbXbjPJ66DycM2F2bzswRpUWwbK-tCfDsRWJz8Tph9uYVjwJgyhr2PU_p_nb-T_5aV</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>899147891</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A whole farm systems analysis of greenhouse gas emissions of 60 Tasmanian dairy farms</title><source>ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)</source><creator>Christie, K.M. ; Rawnsley, R.P. ; Eckard, R.J.</creator><creatorcontrib>Christie, K.M. ; Rawnsley, R.P. ; Eckard, R.J.</creatorcontrib><description>The Australian dairy industry contributes ∼1.6% of the nation's greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, emitting an estimated 8.9 million tonnes of CO2 equivalents (tCO2e)/annum (DCC, 2008). This study examined GHG emissions of 60 Tasmanian dairy farms using the Dairy Greenhouse gas Abatement Strategies (DGAS) calculator, which incorporates International Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) and Australian inventory methodologies, algorithms and emission factors. Sources of GHG emissions including pre-farm embedded emissions associated with key farm inputs (i.e., grains/concentrates, forages and fertilizers) and on-farm emissions from CO2, CH4 and N2O are estimated by DGAS software. A detailed description of GHG calculations and functionality of DGAS software are provided. Total farm GHG emissions of 60 Tasmanian dairy farms, as estimated with DGAS, ranged between 704 and 5839tCO2e/annum, with a mean of 2811tCO2e/annum. Linear regression analyses showed that 0.93 of the difference in total farm GHG emission was explained by milk production. The estimated mean GHG emission intensity of milk of production was 1.04kgCO2e/kg fat and protein corrected milk (FPCM; ranged between 0.83 and 1.39tCO2e/tFPCM) with a standard deviation of 0.13. Stepwise multiple linear regression analysis showed that feed conversion efficiency (kgFPCM/kgdry matter (DM) intake) and N based fertilizer application rate explained 0.60 of the difference in the GHG emissions due to milk production from these pastoral based dairy systems. Estimated per cow and per hectare emission intensity was 6.9±1.46tCO2e/cow and 12.6±4.37tCO2e/ha, respectively. Stepwise multiple linear regression analysis showed that DM intake per cow (tDM intake/cow/lactation) explained 0.86 of the variability in per cow GHG emissions intensity, while milk production/hectare (tFPCM/ha) explained 0.92 of the variability in per hectare GHG emission intensity. Given the influence that feed conversion efficiency and/or N based fertilizer application rates had on all GHG emissions intensities, it is clear that these factors should be key target areas to lower the intensity of emissions associated with dairying in Tasmania. This paper is part of the special issue entitled: Greenhouse Gases in Animal Agriculture – Finding a Balance between Food and Emissions, Guest Edited by T.A. McAllister, Section Guest Editors: K.A. Beauchemin, X. Hao, S. McGinn and Editor for Animal Feed Science and Technology, P.H. Robinson.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0377-8401</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-2216</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2011.04.046</identifier><identifier>CODEN: AFSTDH</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Amsterdam: Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>algorithms ; Animal feeds ; Australia ; Biological and medical sciences ; Carbon dioxide ; climate change ; computer software ; cows ; dairy farming ; dairy industry ; DGAS ; farm inputs ; farms ; Feed and pet food industries ; feed conversion ; feeds ; fertilizer rates ; fertilizers ; Food industries ; foods ; forage ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; grains ; greenhouse gas emissions ; greenhouse gases ; inventories ; lactation ; linear models ; Methane ; milk ; milk production ; Nitrous oxide ; Pre-farm emissions ; regression analysis ; systems analysis</subject><ispartof>Animal feed science and technology, 2011-06, Vol.166-167, p.653-662</ispartof><rights>2011 Elsevier B.V.</rights><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c404t-6ce5d8210e42ecbc66c9233867cd29c76b286877f74ad7a6a9d50188283d09553</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c404t-6ce5d8210e42ecbc66c9233867cd29c76b286877f74ad7a6a9d50188283d09553</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2011.04.046$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>309,310,314,780,784,789,790,3549,23929,23930,25139,27923,27924,45994</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=24383254$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Christie, K.M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rawnsley, R.P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Eckard, R.J.</creatorcontrib><title>A whole farm systems analysis of greenhouse gas emissions of 60 Tasmanian dairy farms</title><title>Animal feed science and technology</title><description>The Australian dairy industry contributes ∼1.6% of the nation's greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, emitting an estimated 8.9 million tonnes of CO2 equivalents (tCO2e)/annum (DCC, 2008). This study examined GHG emissions of 60 Tasmanian dairy farms using the Dairy Greenhouse gas Abatement Strategies (DGAS) calculator, which incorporates International Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) and Australian inventory methodologies, algorithms and emission factors. Sources of GHG emissions including pre-farm embedded emissions associated with key farm inputs (i.e., grains/concentrates, forages and fertilizers) and on-farm emissions from CO2, CH4 and N2O are estimated by DGAS software. A detailed description of GHG calculations and functionality of DGAS software are provided. Total farm GHG emissions of 60 Tasmanian dairy farms, as estimated with DGAS, ranged between 704 and 5839tCO2e/annum, with a mean of 2811tCO2e/annum. Linear regression analyses showed that 0.93 of the difference in total farm GHG emission was explained by milk production. The estimated mean GHG emission intensity of milk of production was 1.04kgCO2e/kg fat and protein corrected milk (FPCM; ranged between 0.83 and 1.39tCO2e/tFPCM) with a standard deviation of 0.13. Stepwise multiple linear regression analysis showed that feed conversion efficiency (kgFPCM/kgdry matter (DM) intake) and N based fertilizer application rate explained 0.60 of the difference in the GHG emissions due to milk production from these pastoral based dairy systems. Estimated per cow and per hectare emission intensity was 6.9±1.46tCO2e/cow and 12.6±4.37tCO2e/ha, respectively. Stepwise multiple linear regression analysis showed that DM intake per cow (tDM intake/cow/lactation) explained 0.86 of the variability in per cow GHG emissions intensity, while milk production/hectare (tFPCM/ha) explained 0.92 of the variability in per hectare GHG emission intensity. Given the influence that feed conversion efficiency and/or N based fertilizer application rates had on all GHG emissions intensities, it is clear that these factors should be key target areas to lower the intensity of emissions associated with dairying in Tasmania. This paper is part of the special issue entitled: Greenhouse Gases in Animal Agriculture – Finding a Balance between Food and Emissions, Guest Edited by T.A. McAllister, Section Guest Editors: K.A. Beauchemin, X. Hao, S. McGinn and Editor for Animal Feed Science and Technology, P.H. Robinson.</description><subject>algorithms</subject><subject>Animal feeds</subject><subject>Australia</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Carbon dioxide</subject><subject>climate change</subject><subject>computer software</subject><subject>cows</subject><subject>dairy farming</subject><subject>dairy industry</subject><subject>DGAS</subject><subject>farm inputs</subject><subject>farms</subject><subject>Feed and pet food industries</subject><subject>feed conversion</subject><subject>feeds</subject><subject>fertilizer rates</subject><subject>fertilizers</subject><subject>Food industries</subject><subject>foods</subject><subject>forage</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>grains</subject><subject>greenhouse gas emissions</subject><subject>greenhouse gases</subject><subject>inventories</subject><subject>lactation</subject><subject>linear models</subject><subject>Methane</subject><subject>milk</subject><subject>milk production</subject><subject>Nitrous oxide</subject><subject>Pre-farm emissions</subject><subject>regression analysis</subject><subject>systems analysis</subject><issn>0377-8401</issn><issn>1873-2216</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2011</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkE1rGzEQhkVIIY7b31BdSk_rSFqtpD26ofkAQw-1z2IizToy-5FqnBb_-8qxSY-FAR30zDsvD2NcioUU0tzsFjCmDjFSSAslpFwIXcZcsJl0tq6UkuaSzURtbeW0kFfsmmgnhFSuVjO2WfI_z1OPvIM8cDrQHgfiMEJ_oER86vg2I47P0ysh3wJxHBJRmsa3PyP4GmgoDWDkEVI-vOXQR_ahg57w0_mds83d9_XtQ7X6cf94u1xVQQu9r0zAJjolBWqF4SkYE1pV187YEFUbrHlSzjhrO6shWjDQxkZI50r1KNqmqefs6yn3JU-_XpH2vrQL2PcwYmnsXdtKbV0rC-lOZMgTUcbOv-Q0QD54KfxRpN_5fyL9UaQXuowpq1_OR4AC9F2GMSR631e6LiYbXbjPJ66DycM2F2bzswRpUWwbK-tCfDsRWJz8Tph9uYVjwJgyhr2PU_p_nb-T_5aV</recordid><startdate>20110623</startdate><enddate>20110623</enddate><creator>Christie, K.M.</creator><creator>Rawnsley, R.P.</creator><creator>Eckard, R.J.</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><general>[New York, NY]: Elsevier Science</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TV</scope><scope>C1K</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20110623</creationdate><title>A whole farm systems analysis of greenhouse gas emissions of 60 Tasmanian dairy farms</title><author>Christie, K.M. ; Rawnsley, R.P. ; Eckard, R.J.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c404t-6ce5d8210e42ecbc66c9233867cd29c76b286877f74ad7a6a9d50188283d09553</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2011</creationdate><topic>algorithms</topic><topic>Animal feeds</topic><topic>Australia</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Carbon dioxide</topic><topic>climate change</topic><topic>computer software</topic><topic>cows</topic><topic>dairy farming</topic><topic>dairy industry</topic><topic>DGAS</topic><topic>farm inputs</topic><topic>farms</topic><topic>Feed and pet food industries</topic><topic>feed conversion</topic><topic>feeds</topic><topic>fertilizer rates</topic><topic>fertilizers</topic><topic>Food industries</topic><topic>foods</topic><topic>forage</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>grains</topic><topic>greenhouse gas emissions</topic><topic>greenhouse gases</topic><topic>inventories</topic><topic>lactation</topic><topic>linear models</topic><topic>Methane</topic><topic>milk</topic><topic>milk production</topic><topic>Nitrous oxide</topic><topic>Pre-farm emissions</topic><topic>regression analysis</topic><topic>systems analysis</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Christie, K.M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rawnsley, R.P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Eckard, R.J.</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Pollution Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><jtitle>Animal feed science and technology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Christie, K.M.</au><au>Rawnsley, R.P.</au><au>Eckard, R.J.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A whole farm systems analysis of greenhouse gas emissions of 60 Tasmanian dairy farms</atitle><jtitle>Animal feed science and technology</jtitle><date>2011-06-23</date><risdate>2011</risdate><volume>166-167</volume><spage>653</spage><epage>662</epage><pages>653-662</pages><issn>0377-8401</issn><eissn>1873-2216</eissn><coden>AFSTDH</coden><abstract>The Australian dairy industry contributes ∼1.6% of the nation's greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, emitting an estimated 8.9 million tonnes of CO2 equivalents (tCO2e)/annum (DCC, 2008). This study examined GHG emissions of 60 Tasmanian dairy farms using the Dairy Greenhouse gas Abatement Strategies (DGAS) calculator, which incorporates International Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) and Australian inventory methodologies, algorithms and emission factors. Sources of GHG emissions including pre-farm embedded emissions associated with key farm inputs (i.e., grains/concentrates, forages and fertilizers) and on-farm emissions from CO2, CH4 and N2O are estimated by DGAS software. A detailed description of GHG calculations and functionality of DGAS software are provided. Total farm GHG emissions of 60 Tasmanian dairy farms, as estimated with DGAS, ranged between 704 and 5839tCO2e/annum, with a mean of 2811tCO2e/annum. Linear regression analyses showed that 0.93 of the difference in total farm GHG emission was explained by milk production. The estimated mean GHG emission intensity of milk of production was 1.04kgCO2e/kg fat and protein corrected milk (FPCM; ranged between 0.83 and 1.39tCO2e/tFPCM) with a standard deviation of 0.13. Stepwise multiple linear regression analysis showed that feed conversion efficiency (kgFPCM/kgdry matter (DM) intake) and N based fertilizer application rate explained 0.60 of the difference in the GHG emissions due to milk production from these pastoral based dairy systems. Estimated per cow and per hectare emission intensity was 6.9±1.46tCO2e/cow and 12.6±4.37tCO2e/ha, respectively. Stepwise multiple linear regression analysis showed that DM intake per cow (tDM intake/cow/lactation) explained 0.86 of the variability in per cow GHG emissions intensity, while milk production/hectare (tFPCM/ha) explained 0.92 of the variability in per hectare GHG emission intensity. Given the influence that feed conversion efficiency and/or N based fertilizer application rates had on all GHG emissions intensities, it is clear that these factors should be key target areas to lower the intensity of emissions associated with dairying in Tasmania. This paper is part of the special issue entitled: Greenhouse Gases in Animal Agriculture – Finding a Balance between Food and Emissions, Guest Edited by T.A. McAllister, Section Guest Editors: K.A. Beauchemin, X. Hao, S. McGinn and Editor for Animal Feed Science and Technology, P.H. Robinson.</abstract><cop>Amsterdam</cop><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><doi>10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2011.04.046</doi><tpages>10</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0377-8401
ispartof Animal feed science and technology, 2011-06, Vol.166-167, p.653-662
issn 0377-8401
1873-2216
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_899147891
source ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)
subjects algorithms
Animal feeds
Australia
Biological and medical sciences
Carbon dioxide
climate change
computer software
cows
dairy farming
dairy industry
DGAS
farm inputs
farms
Feed and pet food industries
feed conversion
feeds
fertilizer rates
fertilizers
Food industries
foods
forage
Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology
grains
greenhouse gas emissions
greenhouse gases
inventories
lactation
linear models
Methane
milk
milk production
Nitrous oxide
Pre-farm emissions
regression analysis
systems analysis
title A whole farm systems analysis of greenhouse gas emissions of 60 Tasmanian dairy farms
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-08T20%3A24%3A35IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20whole%20farm%20systems%20analysis%20of%20greenhouse%20gas%20emissions%20of%2060%20Tasmanian%20dairy%20farms&rft.jtitle=Animal%20feed%20science%20and%20technology&rft.au=Christie,%20K.M.&rft.date=2011-06-23&rft.volume=166-167&rft.spage=653&rft.epage=662&rft.pages=653-662&rft.issn=0377-8401&rft.eissn=1873-2216&rft.coden=AFSTDH&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2011.04.046&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E899147891%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=899147891&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S0377840111001659&rfr_iscdi=true