Low greenhouse gas emissions during composting of solid swine manure

Methane and N2O fluxes during composting of solid swine manure were studied using three aeration systems being, forced aeration (FA), wire mesh (WM) and turnover (TO) and no aeration, for 85d to suggest strategies of mitigating GHG emissions during composting. Manure was collected from a swine resea...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Animal feed science and technology 2011-06, Vol.166-167, p.550-556
Hauptverfasser: Park, K.-H., Jeon, J.H., Jeon, K.H., Kwag, J.H., Choi, D.Y.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 556
container_issue
container_start_page 550
container_title Animal feed science and technology
container_volume 166-167
creator Park, K.-H.
Jeon, J.H.
Jeon, K.H.
Kwag, J.H.
Choi, D.Y.
description Methane and N2O fluxes during composting of solid swine manure were studied using three aeration systems being, forced aeration (FA), wire mesh (WM) and turnover (TO) and no aeration, for 85d to suggest strategies of mitigating GHG emissions during composting. Manure was collected from a swine research barn by a scraper system and mixed with sawdust as a bulking agent. The manure sawdust mixture was placed in linear low density polyethylene containers for each composting method. A steady state chamber covering each container was used to measure CH4 and N2O fluxes during composting in order to sample temporal and spatial heterogeneous fluxes. Air samples were continuously analyzed for CH4 and N2O by a high frequency trace gas analyzer. Mean CH4 fluxes from FA, WM, TO, and no aeration were 5.2, 3.8, 7.5, and 34.6μg/m2/s, respectively. Mean N2O fluxes from FA, WM, TO, and no aeration were 1.6, 3.1, 7.9, and 11.4μg/m2/s, respectively. Ratios of CO2-equiv. emitted from FA, WM, TO and no aeration were 0.14, 0.24, and 0.59, respectively. Nitrous oxide was the main contributor to CO2-equiv. fluxes. The FA system had the lowest emissions, but WM had the advantage of not requiring electricity for aeration. This paper is part of the special issue entitled: Greenhouse Gases in Animal Agriculture – Finding a Balance between Food and Emissions, Guest Edited by T.A. McAllister, Section Guest Editors: K.A. Beauchemin, X. Hao, S. McGinn and Editor for Animal Feed Science and Technology, P.H. Robinson.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2011.04.078
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_899140718</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0377840111001970</els_id><sourcerecordid>899140718</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c404t-552b89a8f5450d09f62d514e9b0efbf667bd4acec006fa6ec4056bc420c749473</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkMFuEzEQhi0EEqHwDPiCetrt2Otde4_QAkWKxAF6trzecXC0sYMnacXb4yhVe6wv48P3z_z6GOMCWgFiuNq2LsWAOJOPrQQhWlAtaPOKrYTRXSOlGF6zFXRaN0aBeMveEW0BhDSdXLGbdX7gm4KY_uQjId844riLRDEn4vOxxLThPu_2mQ6nbw6c8hJnTg8xId-5dCz4nr0JbiH88Dgv2N23r7-vb5v1z-8_rj-vG69AHZq-l5MZnQm96mGGMQxy7oXCcQIMUxgGPc3KefQAQ3AD1lQ_TF5J8FqNSncX7PK8d1_y3yPSwdamHpfFJaztrRlHoUALU0lzJn3JRAWD3Ze4c-WfFWBP3uzWPnuzJ28WlK3eavTT4xFH3i2huOQjPeWl6qo41VXu45kLLlu3KZW5-1UXKahP6g4q8eVMYHVyH7HYeguTxzkW9Ac75_hynf9bFpIR</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>899140718</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Low greenhouse gas emissions during composting of solid swine manure</title><source>ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)</source><creator>Park, K.-H. ; Jeon, J.H. ; Jeon, K.H. ; Kwag, J.H. ; Choi, D.Y.</creator><creatorcontrib>Park, K.-H. ; Jeon, J.H. ; Jeon, K.H. ; Kwag, J.H. ; Choi, D.Y.</creatorcontrib><description>Methane and N2O fluxes during composting of solid swine manure were studied using three aeration systems being, forced aeration (FA), wire mesh (WM) and turnover (TO) and no aeration, for 85d to suggest strategies of mitigating GHG emissions during composting. Manure was collected from a swine research barn by a scraper system and mixed with sawdust as a bulking agent. The manure sawdust mixture was placed in linear low density polyethylene containers for each composting method. A steady state chamber covering each container was used to measure CH4 and N2O fluxes during composting in order to sample temporal and spatial heterogeneous fluxes. Air samples were continuously analyzed for CH4 and N2O by a high frequency trace gas analyzer. Mean CH4 fluxes from FA, WM, TO, and no aeration were 5.2, 3.8, 7.5, and 34.6μg/m2/s, respectively. Mean N2O fluxes from FA, WM, TO, and no aeration were 1.6, 3.1, 7.9, and 11.4μg/m2/s, respectively. Ratios of CO2-equiv. emitted from FA, WM, TO and no aeration were 0.14, 0.24, and 0.59, respectively. Nitrous oxide was the main contributor to CO2-equiv. fluxes. The FA system had the lowest emissions, but WM had the advantage of not requiring electricity for aeration. This paper is part of the special issue entitled: Greenhouse Gases in Animal Agriculture – Finding a Balance between Food and Emissions, Guest Edited by T.A. McAllister, Section Guest Editors: K.A. Beauchemin, X. Hao, S. McGinn and Editor for Animal Feed Science and Technology, P.H. Robinson.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0377-8401</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-2216</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2011.04.078</identifier><identifier>CODEN: AFSTDH</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Amsterdam: Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>aeration ; air ; Animal productions ; barns ; Biological and medical sciences ; Chimney effect ; Climate change ; composting ; containers ; electricity ; Feed and pet food industries ; Food industries ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; greenhouse gas emissions ; greenhouse gases ; Mega chamber ; methane ; Natural composting ; nitrous oxide ; pig manure ; polyethylene ; sawdust ; swine ; Terrestrial animal productions ; Vertebrates</subject><ispartof>Animal feed science and technology, 2011-06, Vol.166-167, p.550-556</ispartof><rights>2011 Elsevier B.V.</rights><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c404t-552b89a8f5450d09f62d514e9b0efbf667bd4acec006fa6ec4056bc420c749473</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c404t-552b89a8f5450d09f62d514e9b0efbf667bd4acec006fa6ec4056bc420c749473</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2011.04.078$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>309,310,314,780,784,789,790,3550,23930,23931,25140,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=24383243$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Park, K.-H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jeon, J.H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jeon, K.H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kwag, J.H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Choi, D.Y.</creatorcontrib><title>Low greenhouse gas emissions during composting of solid swine manure</title><title>Animal feed science and technology</title><description>Methane and N2O fluxes during composting of solid swine manure were studied using three aeration systems being, forced aeration (FA), wire mesh (WM) and turnover (TO) and no aeration, for 85d to suggest strategies of mitigating GHG emissions during composting. Manure was collected from a swine research barn by a scraper system and mixed with sawdust as a bulking agent. The manure sawdust mixture was placed in linear low density polyethylene containers for each composting method. A steady state chamber covering each container was used to measure CH4 and N2O fluxes during composting in order to sample temporal and spatial heterogeneous fluxes. Air samples were continuously analyzed for CH4 and N2O by a high frequency trace gas analyzer. Mean CH4 fluxes from FA, WM, TO, and no aeration were 5.2, 3.8, 7.5, and 34.6μg/m2/s, respectively. Mean N2O fluxes from FA, WM, TO, and no aeration were 1.6, 3.1, 7.9, and 11.4μg/m2/s, respectively. Ratios of CO2-equiv. emitted from FA, WM, TO and no aeration were 0.14, 0.24, and 0.59, respectively. Nitrous oxide was the main contributor to CO2-equiv. fluxes. The FA system had the lowest emissions, but WM had the advantage of not requiring electricity for aeration. This paper is part of the special issue entitled: Greenhouse Gases in Animal Agriculture – Finding a Balance between Food and Emissions, Guest Edited by T.A. McAllister, Section Guest Editors: K.A. Beauchemin, X. Hao, S. McGinn and Editor for Animal Feed Science and Technology, P.H. Robinson.</description><subject>aeration</subject><subject>air</subject><subject>Animal productions</subject><subject>barns</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Chimney effect</subject><subject>Climate change</subject><subject>composting</subject><subject>containers</subject><subject>electricity</subject><subject>Feed and pet food industries</subject><subject>Food industries</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>greenhouse gas emissions</subject><subject>greenhouse gases</subject><subject>Mega chamber</subject><subject>methane</subject><subject>Natural composting</subject><subject>nitrous oxide</subject><subject>pig manure</subject><subject>polyethylene</subject><subject>sawdust</subject><subject>swine</subject><subject>Terrestrial animal productions</subject><subject>Vertebrates</subject><issn>0377-8401</issn><issn>1873-2216</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2011</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkMFuEzEQhi0EEqHwDPiCetrt2Otde4_QAkWKxAF6trzecXC0sYMnacXb4yhVe6wv48P3z_z6GOMCWgFiuNq2LsWAOJOPrQQhWlAtaPOKrYTRXSOlGF6zFXRaN0aBeMveEW0BhDSdXLGbdX7gm4KY_uQjId844riLRDEn4vOxxLThPu_2mQ6nbw6c8hJnTg8xId-5dCz4nr0JbiH88Dgv2N23r7-vb5v1z-8_rj-vG69AHZq-l5MZnQm96mGGMQxy7oXCcQIMUxgGPc3KefQAQ3AD1lQ_TF5J8FqNSncX7PK8d1_y3yPSwdamHpfFJaztrRlHoUALU0lzJn3JRAWD3Ze4c-WfFWBP3uzWPnuzJ28WlK3eavTT4xFH3i2huOQjPeWl6qo41VXu45kLLlu3KZW5-1UXKahP6g4q8eVMYHVyH7HYeguTxzkW9Ac75_hynf9bFpIR</recordid><startdate>20110623</startdate><enddate>20110623</enddate><creator>Park, K.-H.</creator><creator>Jeon, J.H.</creator><creator>Jeon, K.H.</creator><creator>Kwag, J.H.</creator><creator>Choi, D.Y.</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><general>[New York, NY]: Elsevier Science</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TV</scope><scope>C1K</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20110623</creationdate><title>Low greenhouse gas emissions during composting of solid swine manure</title><author>Park, K.-H. ; Jeon, J.H. ; Jeon, K.H. ; Kwag, J.H. ; Choi, D.Y.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c404t-552b89a8f5450d09f62d514e9b0efbf667bd4acec006fa6ec4056bc420c749473</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2011</creationdate><topic>aeration</topic><topic>air</topic><topic>Animal productions</topic><topic>barns</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Chimney effect</topic><topic>Climate change</topic><topic>composting</topic><topic>containers</topic><topic>electricity</topic><topic>Feed and pet food industries</topic><topic>Food industries</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>greenhouse gas emissions</topic><topic>greenhouse gases</topic><topic>Mega chamber</topic><topic>methane</topic><topic>Natural composting</topic><topic>nitrous oxide</topic><topic>pig manure</topic><topic>polyethylene</topic><topic>sawdust</topic><topic>swine</topic><topic>Terrestrial animal productions</topic><topic>Vertebrates</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Park, K.-H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jeon, J.H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jeon, K.H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kwag, J.H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Choi, D.Y.</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Pollution Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><jtitle>Animal feed science and technology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Park, K.-H.</au><au>Jeon, J.H.</au><au>Jeon, K.H.</au><au>Kwag, J.H.</au><au>Choi, D.Y.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Low greenhouse gas emissions during composting of solid swine manure</atitle><jtitle>Animal feed science and technology</jtitle><date>2011-06-23</date><risdate>2011</risdate><volume>166-167</volume><spage>550</spage><epage>556</epage><pages>550-556</pages><issn>0377-8401</issn><eissn>1873-2216</eissn><coden>AFSTDH</coden><abstract>Methane and N2O fluxes during composting of solid swine manure were studied using three aeration systems being, forced aeration (FA), wire mesh (WM) and turnover (TO) and no aeration, for 85d to suggest strategies of mitigating GHG emissions during composting. Manure was collected from a swine research barn by a scraper system and mixed with sawdust as a bulking agent. The manure sawdust mixture was placed in linear low density polyethylene containers for each composting method. A steady state chamber covering each container was used to measure CH4 and N2O fluxes during composting in order to sample temporal and spatial heterogeneous fluxes. Air samples were continuously analyzed for CH4 and N2O by a high frequency trace gas analyzer. Mean CH4 fluxes from FA, WM, TO, and no aeration were 5.2, 3.8, 7.5, and 34.6μg/m2/s, respectively. Mean N2O fluxes from FA, WM, TO, and no aeration were 1.6, 3.1, 7.9, and 11.4μg/m2/s, respectively. Ratios of CO2-equiv. emitted from FA, WM, TO and no aeration were 0.14, 0.24, and 0.59, respectively. Nitrous oxide was the main contributor to CO2-equiv. fluxes. The FA system had the lowest emissions, but WM had the advantage of not requiring electricity for aeration. This paper is part of the special issue entitled: Greenhouse Gases in Animal Agriculture – Finding a Balance between Food and Emissions, Guest Edited by T.A. McAllister, Section Guest Editors: K.A. Beauchemin, X. Hao, S. McGinn and Editor for Animal Feed Science and Technology, P.H. Robinson.</abstract><cop>Amsterdam</cop><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><doi>10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2011.04.078</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0377-8401
ispartof Animal feed science and technology, 2011-06, Vol.166-167, p.550-556
issn 0377-8401
1873-2216
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_899140718
source ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)
subjects aeration
air
Animal productions
barns
Biological and medical sciences
Chimney effect
Climate change
composting
containers
electricity
Feed and pet food industries
Food industries
Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology
greenhouse gas emissions
greenhouse gases
Mega chamber
methane
Natural composting
nitrous oxide
pig manure
polyethylene
sawdust
swine
Terrestrial animal productions
Vertebrates
title Low greenhouse gas emissions during composting of solid swine manure
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-06T03%3A06%3A27IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Low%20greenhouse%20gas%20emissions%20during%20composting%20of%20solid%20swine%20manure&rft.jtitle=Animal%20feed%20science%20and%20technology&rft.au=Park,%20K.-H.&rft.date=2011-06-23&rft.volume=166-167&rft.spage=550&rft.epage=556&rft.pages=550-556&rft.issn=0377-8401&rft.eissn=1873-2216&rft.coden=AFSTDH&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2011.04.078&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E899140718%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=899140718&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S0377840111001970&rfr_iscdi=true