Validity of Cobb angle measurements using digitally photographed radiographs

Abstract Background context Advances in technology are influencing the way that medical information is archived and shared. Considering that an estimated two-thirds of the world has little or no orthopedic care, high demand exists for adequate consultation regarding diagnostic images in orthopedic s...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The spine journal 2011-10, Vol.11 (10), p.942-946
Hauptverfasser: Ricart, Pedro A., MD, Andres, Tate M., BS, Apazidis, Alexios, MD, Errico, Thomas J., MD, Trobisch, Per D., MD
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 946
container_issue 10
container_start_page 942
container_title The spine journal
container_volume 11
creator Ricart, Pedro A., MD
Andres, Tate M., BS
Apazidis, Alexios, MD
Errico, Thomas J., MD
Trobisch, Per D., MD
description Abstract Background context Advances in technology are influencing the way that medical information is archived and shared. Considering that an estimated two-thirds of the world has little or no orthopedic care, high demand exists for adequate consultation regarding diagnostic images in orthopedic specialties. Purpose To validate the use of photographed scoliosis films for the accurate interpretation of Cobb angles. Study design Retrospective review. Patient sample Thirty scoliosis radiographs. Outcome measure Cobb angle. Methods Thirty scoliosis radiographs were photographed using a digital camera from a straight and a 45° angle position. Cobb angles were then measured on the digital images using standard measurement software. Comparison was made between two types of curves: convex and concave, relative to the left side (side for the angled position). Results There was excellent reproducibility between the measurements of the conventional radiographs and the photographs taken from a straight on position, p value of .97 for convex curves and p value of .98 for concave curves. Photographs taken from a 45° angle significantly increased the magnitude of the curve convex to the angle (p=.001). Conclusion Sharing photographs of scoliosis radiographs can be done with reliability if the image is taken directly in front of the viewbox rather than at an oblique angle; pictures taken at oblique angles are prone to misinterpretation of curve magnitude.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.spinee.2011.09.003
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_899133935</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S1529943011011636</els_id><sourcerecordid>899133935</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c416t-e319d3ca12b97d9dd09ef842905e68e0feba9a4ca56849dff5184117fca666853</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkU2r1TAQhoMo3g_9ByLduWqdJG2abAQ5XPXCARd-bEOaTM_NMW1q0grn39vSqws3rmYG3nmHeV5CXlGoKFDx9lzlyY-IFQNKK1AVAH9CrqlsZUkFZ0_XvmGqVDWHK3KT8xkAZEvZc3LFGEADrbomx-8meOfnSxH74hC7rjDjKWAxoMlLwgHHORdL9uOpcP7kZxPCpZge4hxPyUwP6IpknN-H_II8603I-PKx3pJvH-6-Hj6Vx88f7w_vj6WtqZhL5FQ5bg1lnWqdcg4U9rJmChoUEqHHzihTW9MIWSvX9w2VNaVtb40QQjb8lrzZfacUfy6YZz34bDEEM2JcspZKUc4V35T1rrQp5pyw11Pyg0kXTUFvGPVZ7xj1hlGD0ivGde3144GlG9D9XfrDbRW82wW4vvnLY9LZehwtOp_QztpF_78L_xrY4EdvTfiBF8znuKRxRaipzkyD_rJFuSVJV8s1XcF_A3eVmys</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>899133935</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Validity of Cobb angle measurements using digitally photographed radiographs</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)</source><creator>Ricart, Pedro A., MD ; Andres, Tate M., BS ; Apazidis, Alexios, MD ; Errico, Thomas J., MD ; Trobisch, Per D., MD</creator><creatorcontrib>Ricart, Pedro A., MD ; Andres, Tate M., BS ; Apazidis, Alexios, MD ; Errico, Thomas J., MD ; Trobisch, Per D., MD</creatorcontrib><description>Abstract Background context Advances in technology are influencing the way that medical information is archived and shared. Considering that an estimated two-thirds of the world has little or no orthopedic care, high demand exists for adequate consultation regarding diagnostic images in orthopedic specialties. Purpose To validate the use of photographed scoliosis films for the accurate interpretation of Cobb angles. Study design Retrospective review. Patient sample Thirty scoliosis radiographs. Outcome measure Cobb angle. Methods Thirty scoliosis radiographs were photographed using a digital camera from a straight and a 45° angle position. Cobb angles were then measured on the digital images using standard measurement software. Comparison was made between two types of curves: convex and concave, relative to the left side (side for the angled position). Results There was excellent reproducibility between the measurements of the conventional radiographs and the photographs taken from a straight on position, p value of .97 for convex curves and p value of .98 for concave curves. Photographs taken from a 45° angle significantly increased the magnitude of the curve convex to the angle (p=.001). Conclusion Sharing photographs of scoliosis radiographs can be done with reliability if the image is taken directly in front of the viewbox rather than at an oblique angle; pictures taken at oblique angles are prone to misinterpretation of curve magnitude.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1529-9430</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1878-1632</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.spinee.2011.09.003</identifier><identifier>PMID: 22005079</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Cobb angle ; Digital photography ; Humans ; Lumbar Vertebrae - diagnostic imaging ; Orthopedics ; Radiographic Image Enhancement - methods ; Reproducibility of Results ; Retrospective Studies ; Scoliosis ; Scoliosis - diagnostic imaging ; Teleradiology ; Thoracic Vertebrae - diagnostic imaging ; Validation</subject><ispartof>The spine journal, 2011-10, Vol.11 (10), p.942-946</ispartof><rights>Elsevier Inc.</rights><rights>2011 Elsevier Inc.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c416t-e319d3ca12b97d9dd09ef842905e68e0feba9a4ca56849dff5184117fca666853</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c416t-e319d3ca12b97d9dd09ef842905e68e0feba9a4ca56849dff5184117fca666853</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.spinee.2011.09.003$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,778,782,3539,27907,27908,45978</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22005079$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ricart, Pedro A., MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Andres, Tate M., BS</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Apazidis, Alexios, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Errico, Thomas J., MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Trobisch, Per D., MD</creatorcontrib><title>Validity of Cobb angle measurements using digitally photographed radiographs</title><title>The spine journal</title><addtitle>Spine J</addtitle><description>Abstract Background context Advances in technology are influencing the way that medical information is archived and shared. Considering that an estimated two-thirds of the world has little or no orthopedic care, high demand exists for adequate consultation regarding diagnostic images in orthopedic specialties. Purpose To validate the use of photographed scoliosis films for the accurate interpretation of Cobb angles. Study design Retrospective review. Patient sample Thirty scoliosis radiographs. Outcome measure Cobb angle. Methods Thirty scoliosis radiographs were photographed using a digital camera from a straight and a 45° angle position. Cobb angles were then measured on the digital images using standard measurement software. Comparison was made between two types of curves: convex and concave, relative to the left side (side for the angled position). Results There was excellent reproducibility between the measurements of the conventional radiographs and the photographs taken from a straight on position, p value of .97 for convex curves and p value of .98 for concave curves. Photographs taken from a 45° angle significantly increased the magnitude of the curve convex to the angle (p=.001). Conclusion Sharing photographs of scoliosis radiographs can be done with reliability if the image is taken directly in front of the viewbox rather than at an oblique angle; pictures taken at oblique angles are prone to misinterpretation of curve magnitude.</description><subject>Cobb angle</subject><subject>Digital photography</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Lumbar Vertebrae - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Orthopedics</subject><subject>Radiographic Image Enhancement - methods</subject><subject>Reproducibility of Results</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Scoliosis</subject><subject>Scoliosis - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Teleradiology</subject><subject>Thoracic Vertebrae - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Validation</subject><issn>1529-9430</issn><issn>1878-1632</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2011</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkU2r1TAQhoMo3g_9ByLduWqdJG2abAQ5XPXCARd-bEOaTM_NMW1q0grn39vSqws3rmYG3nmHeV5CXlGoKFDx9lzlyY-IFQNKK1AVAH9CrqlsZUkFZ0_XvmGqVDWHK3KT8xkAZEvZc3LFGEADrbomx-8meOfnSxH74hC7rjDjKWAxoMlLwgHHORdL9uOpcP7kZxPCpZge4hxPyUwP6IpknN-H_II8603I-PKx3pJvH-6-Hj6Vx88f7w_vj6WtqZhL5FQ5bg1lnWqdcg4U9rJmChoUEqHHzihTW9MIWSvX9w2VNaVtb40QQjb8lrzZfacUfy6YZz34bDEEM2JcspZKUc4V35T1rrQp5pyw11Pyg0kXTUFvGPVZ7xj1hlGD0ivGde3144GlG9D9XfrDbRW82wW4vvnLY9LZehwtOp_QztpF_78L_xrY4EdvTfiBF8znuKRxRaipzkyD_rJFuSVJV8s1XcF_A3eVmys</recordid><startdate>20111001</startdate><enddate>20111001</enddate><creator>Ricart, Pedro A., MD</creator><creator>Andres, Tate M., BS</creator><creator>Apazidis, Alexios, MD</creator><creator>Errico, Thomas J., MD</creator><creator>Trobisch, Per D., MD</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20111001</creationdate><title>Validity of Cobb angle measurements using digitally photographed radiographs</title><author>Ricart, Pedro A., MD ; Andres, Tate M., BS ; Apazidis, Alexios, MD ; Errico, Thomas J., MD ; Trobisch, Per D., MD</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c416t-e319d3ca12b97d9dd09ef842905e68e0feba9a4ca56849dff5184117fca666853</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2011</creationdate><topic>Cobb angle</topic><topic>Digital photography</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Lumbar Vertebrae - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Orthopedics</topic><topic>Radiographic Image Enhancement - methods</topic><topic>Reproducibility of Results</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Scoliosis</topic><topic>Scoliosis - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Teleradiology</topic><topic>Thoracic Vertebrae - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Validation</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ricart, Pedro A., MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Andres, Tate M., BS</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Apazidis, Alexios, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Errico, Thomas J., MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Trobisch, Per D., MD</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>The spine journal</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ricart, Pedro A., MD</au><au>Andres, Tate M., BS</au><au>Apazidis, Alexios, MD</au><au>Errico, Thomas J., MD</au><au>Trobisch, Per D., MD</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Validity of Cobb angle measurements using digitally photographed radiographs</atitle><jtitle>The spine journal</jtitle><addtitle>Spine J</addtitle><date>2011-10-01</date><risdate>2011</risdate><volume>11</volume><issue>10</issue><spage>942</spage><epage>946</epage><pages>942-946</pages><issn>1529-9430</issn><eissn>1878-1632</eissn><abstract>Abstract Background context Advances in technology are influencing the way that medical information is archived and shared. Considering that an estimated two-thirds of the world has little or no orthopedic care, high demand exists for adequate consultation regarding diagnostic images in orthopedic specialties. Purpose To validate the use of photographed scoliosis films for the accurate interpretation of Cobb angles. Study design Retrospective review. Patient sample Thirty scoliosis radiographs. Outcome measure Cobb angle. Methods Thirty scoliosis radiographs were photographed using a digital camera from a straight and a 45° angle position. Cobb angles were then measured on the digital images using standard measurement software. Comparison was made between two types of curves: convex and concave, relative to the left side (side for the angled position). Results There was excellent reproducibility between the measurements of the conventional radiographs and the photographs taken from a straight on position, p value of .97 for convex curves and p value of .98 for concave curves. Photographs taken from a 45° angle significantly increased the magnitude of the curve convex to the angle (p=.001). Conclusion Sharing photographs of scoliosis radiographs can be done with reliability if the image is taken directly in front of the viewbox rather than at an oblique angle; pictures taken at oblique angles are prone to misinterpretation of curve magnitude.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>22005079</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.spinee.2011.09.003</doi><tpages>5</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1529-9430
ispartof The spine journal, 2011-10, Vol.11 (10), p.942-946
issn 1529-9430
1878-1632
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_899133935
source MEDLINE; ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)
subjects Cobb angle
Digital photography
Humans
Lumbar Vertebrae - diagnostic imaging
Orthopedics
Radiographic Image Enhancement - methods
Reproducibility of Results
Retrospective Studies
Scoliosis
Scoliosis - diagnostic imaging
Teleradiology
Thoracic Vertebrae - diagnostic imaging
Validation
title Validity of Cobb angle measurements using digitally photographed radiographs
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-16T08%3A01%3A15IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Validity%20of%20Cobb%20angle%20measurements%20using%20digitally%20photographed%20radiographs&rft.jtitle=The%20spine%20journal&rft.au=Ricart,%20Pedro%20A.,%20MD&rft.date=2011-10-01&rft.volume=11&rft.issue=10&rft.spage=942&rft.epage=946&rft.pages=942-946&rft.issn=1529-9430&rft.eissn=1878-1632&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.spinee.2011.09.003&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E899133935%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=899133935&rft_id=info:pmid/22005079&rft_els_id=S1529943011011636&rfr_iscdi=true