Validity of Cobb angle measurements using digitally photographed radiographs
Abstract Background context Advances in technology are influencing the way that medical information is archived and shared. Considering that an estimated two-thirds of the world has little or no orthopedic care, high demand exists for adequate consultation regarding diagnostic images in orthopedic s...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | The spine journal 2011-10, Vol.11 (10), p.942-946 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 946 |
---|---|
container_issue | 10 |
container_start_page | 942 |
container_title | The spine journal |
container_volume | 11 |
creator | Ricart, Pedro A., MD Andres, Tate M., BS Apazidis, Alexios, MD Errico, Thomas J., MD Trobisch, Per D., MD |
description | Abstract Background context Advances in technology are influencing the way that medical information is archived and shared. Considering that an estimated two-thirds of the world has little or no orthopedic care, high demand exists for adequate consultation regarding diagnostic images in orthopedic specialties. Purpose To validate the use of photographed scoliosis films for the accurate interpretation of Cobb angles. Study design Retrospective review. Patient sample Thirty scoliosis radiographs. Outcome measure Cobb angle. Methods Thirty scoliosis radiographs were photographed using a digital camera from a straight and a 45° angle position. Cobb angles were then measured on the digital images using standard measurement software. Comparison was made between two types of curves: convex and concave, relative to the left side (side for the angled position). Results There was excellent reproducibility between the measurements of the conventional radiographs and the photographs taken from a straight on position, p value of .97 for convex curves and p value of .98 for concave curves. Photographs taken from a 45° angle significantly increased the magnitude of the curve convex to the angle (p=.001). Conclusion Sharing photographs of scoliosis radiographs can be done with reliability if the image is taken directly in front of the viewbox rather than at an oblique angle; pictures taken at oblique angles are prone to misinterpretation of curve magnitude. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.spinee.2011.09.003 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_899133935</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S1529943011011636</els_id><sourcerecordid>899133935</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c416t-e319d3ca12b97d9dd09ef842905e68e0feba9a4ca56849dff5184117fca666853</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkU2r1TAQhoMo3g_9ByLduWqdJG2abAQ5XPXCARd-bEOaTM_NMW1q0grn39vSqws3rmYG3nmHeV5CXlGoKFDx9lzlyY-IFQNKK1AVAH9CrqlsZUkFZ0_XvmGqVDWHK3KT8xkAZEvZc3LFGEADrbomx-8meOfnSxH74hC7rjDjKWAxoMlLwgHHORdL9uOpcP7kZxPCpZge4hxPyUwP6IpknN-H_II8603I-PKx3pJvH-6-Hj6Vx88f7w_vj6WtqZhL5FQ5bg1lnWqdcg4U9rJmChoUEqHHzihTW9MIWSvX9w2VNaVtb40QQjb8lrzZfacUfy6YZz34bDEEM2JcspZKUc4V35T1rrQp5pyw11Pyg0kXTUFvGPVZ7xj1hlGD0ivGde3144GlG9D9XfrDbRW82wW4vvnLY9LZehwtOp_QztpF_78L_xrY4EdvTfiBF8znuKRxRaipzkyD_rJFuSVJV8s1XcF_A3eVmys</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>899133935</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Validity of Cobb angle measurements using digitally photographed radiographs</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)</source><creator>Ricart, Pedro A., MD ; Andres, Tate M., BS ; Apazidis, Alexios, MD ; Errico, Thomas J., MD ; Trobisch, Per D., MD</creator><creatorcontrib>Ricart, Pedro A., MD ; Andres, Tate M., BS ; Apazidis, Alexios, MD ; Errico, Thomas J., MD ; Trobisch, Per D., MD</creatorcontrib><description>Abstract Background context Advances in technology are influencing the way that medical information is archived and shared. Considering that an estimated two-thirds of the world has little or no orthopedic care, high demand exists for adequate consultation regarding diagnostic images in orthopedic specialties. Purpose To validate the use of photographed scoliosis films for the accurate interpretation of Cobb angles. Study design Retrospective review. Patient sample Thirty scoliosis radiographs. Outcome measure Cobb angle. Methods Thirty scoliosis radiographs were photographed using a digital camera from a straight and a 45° angle position. Cobb angles were then measured on the digital images using standard measurement software. Comparison was made between two types of curves: convex and concave, relative to the left side (side for the angled position). Results There was excellent reproducibility between the measurements of the conventional radiographs and the photographs taken from a straight on position, p value of .97 for convex curves and p value of .98 for concave curves. Photographs taken from a 45° angle significantly increased the magnitude of the curve convex to the angle (p=.001). Conclusion Sharing photographs of scoliosis radiographs can be done with reliability if the image is taken directly in front of the viewbox rather than at an oblique angle; pictures taken at oblique angles are prone to misinterpretation of curve magnitude.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1529-9430</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1878-1632</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.spinee.2011.09.003</identifier><identifier>PMID: 22005079</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Cobb angle ; Digital photography ; Humans ; Lumbar Vertebrae - diagnostic imaging ; Orthopedics ; Radiographic Image Enhancement - methods ; Reproducibility of Results ; Retrospective Studies ; Scoliosis ; Scoliosis - diagnostic imaging ; Teleradiology ; Thoracic Vertebrae - diagnostic imaging ; Validation</subject><ispartof>The spine journal, 2011-10, Vol.11 (10), p.942-946</ispartof><rights>Elsevier Inc.</rights><rights>2011 Elsevier Inc.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c416t-e319d3ca12b97d9dd09ef842905e68e0feba9a4ca56849dff5184117fca666853</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c416t-e319d3ca12b97d9dd09ef842905e68e0feba9a4ca56849dff5184117fca666853</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.spinee.2011.09.003$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,778,782,3539,27907,27908,45978</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22005079$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ricart, Pedro A., MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Andres, Tate M., BS</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Apazidis, Alexios, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Errico, Thomas J., MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Trobisch, Per D., MD</creatorcontrib><title>Validity of Cobb angle measurements using digitally photographed radiographs</title><title>The spine journal</title><addtitle>Spine J</addtitle><description>Abstract Background context Advances in technology are influencing the way that medical information is archived and shared. Considering that an estimated two-thirds of the world has little or no orthopedic care, high demand exists for adequate consultation regarding diagnostic images in orthopedic specialties. Purpose To validate the use of photographed scoliosis films for the accurate interpretation of Cobb angles. Study design Retrospective review. Patient sample Thirty scoliosis radiographs. Outcome measure Cobb angle. Methods Thirty scoliosis radiographs were photographed using a digital camera from a straight and a 45° angle position. Cobb angles were then measured on the digital images using standard measurement software. Comparison was made between two types of curves: convex and concave, relative to the left side (side for the angled position). Results There was excellent reproducibility between the measurements of the conventional radiographs and the photographs taken from a straight on position, p value of .97 for convex curves and p value of .98 for concave curves. Photographs taken from a 45° angle significantly increased the magnitude of the curve convex to the angle (p=.001). Conclusion Sharing photographs of scoliosis radiographs can be done with reliability if the image is taken directly in front of the viewbox rather than at an oblique angle; pictures taken at oblique angles are prone to misinterpretation of curve magnitude.</description><subject>Cobb angle</subject><subject>Digital photography</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Lumbar Vertebrae - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Orthopedics</subject><subject>Radiographic Image Enhancement - methods</subject><subject>Reproducibility of Results</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Scoliosis</subject><subject>Scoliosis - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Teleradiology</subject><subject>Thoracic Vertebrae - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Validation</subject><issn>1529-9430</issn><issn>1878-1632</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2011</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkU2r1TAQhoMo3g_9ByLduWqdJG2abAQ5XPXCARd-bEOaTM_NMW1q0grn39vSqws3rmYG3nmHeV5CXlGoKFDx9lzlyY-IFQNKK1AVAH9CrqlsZUkFZ0_XvmGqVDWHK3KT8xkAZEvZc3LFGEADrbomx-8meOfnSxH74hC7rjDjKWAxoMlLwgHHORdL9uOpcP7kZxPCpZge4hxPyUwP6IpknN-H_II8603I-PKx3pJvH-6-Hj6Vx88f7w_vj6WtqZhL5FQ5bg1lnWqdcg4U9rJmChoUEqHHzihTW9MIWSvX9w2VNaVtb40QQjb8lrzZfacUfy6YZz34bDEEM2JcspZKUc4V35T1rrQp5pyw11Pyg0kXTUFvGPVZ7xj1hlGD0ivGde3144GlG9D9XfrDbRW82wW4vvnLY9LZehwtOp_QztpF_78L_xrY4EdvTfiBF8znuKRxRaipzkyD_rJFuSVJV8s1XcF_A3eVmys</recordid><startdate>20111001</startdate><enddate>20111001</enddate><creator>Ricart, Pedro A., MD</creator><creator>Andres, Tate M., BS</creator><creator>Apazidis, Alexios, MD</creator><creator>Errico, Thomas J., MD</creator><creator>Trobisch, Per D., MD</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20111001</creationdate><title>Validity of Cobb angle measurements using digitally photographed radiographs</title><author>Ricart, Pedro A., MD ; Andres, Tate M., BS ; Apazidis, Alexios, MD ; Errico, Thomas J., MD ; Trobisch, Per D., MD</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c416t-e319d3ca12b97d9dd09ef842905e68e0feba9a4ca56849dff5184117fca666853</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2011</creationdate><topic>Cobb angle</topic><topic>Digital photography</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Lumbar Vertebrae - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Orthopedics</topic><topic>Radiographic Image Enhancement - methods</topic><topic>Reproducibility of Results</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Scoliosis</topic><topic>Scoliosis - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Teleradiology</topic><topic>Thoracic Vertebrae - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Validation</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ricart, Pedro A., MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Andres, Tate M., BS</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Apazidis, Alexios, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Errico, Thomas J., MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Trobisch, Per D., MD</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>The spine journal</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ricart, Pedro A., MD</au><au>Andres, Tate M., BS</au><au>Apazidis, Alexios, MD</au><au>Errico, Thomas J., MD</au><au>Trobisch, Per D., MD</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Validity of Cobb angle measurements using digitally photographed radiographs</atitle><jtitle>The spine journal</jtitle><addtitle>Spine J</addtitle><date>2011-10-01</date><risdate>2011</risdate><volume>11</volume><issue>10</issue><spage>942</spage><epage>946</epage><pages>942-946</pages><issn>1529-9430</issn><eissn>1878-1632</eissn><abstract>Abstract Background context Advances in technology are influencing the way that medical information is archived and shared. Considering that an estimated two-thirds of the world has little or no orthopedic care, high demand exists for adequate consultation regarding diagnostic images in orthopedic specialties. Purpose To validate the use of photographed scoliosis films for the accurate interpretation of Cobb angles. Study design Retrospective review. Patient sample Thirty scoliosis radiographs. Outcome measure Cobb angle. Methods Thirty scoliosis radiographs were photographed using a digital camera from a straight and a 45° angle position. Cobb angles were then measured on the digital images using standard measurement software. Comparison was made between two types of curves: convex and concave, relative to the left side (side for the angled position). Results There was excellent reproducibility between the measurements of the conventional radiographs and the photographs taken from a straight on position, p value of .97 for convex curves and p value of .98 for concave curves. Photographs taken from a 45° angle significantly increased the magnitude of the curve convex to the angle (p=.001). Conclusion Sharing photographs of scoliosis radiographs can be done with reliability if the image is taken directly in front of the viewbox rather than at an oblique angle; pictures taken at oblique angles are prone to misinterpretation of curve magnitude.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>22005079</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.spinee.2011.09.003</doi><tpages>5</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1529-9430 |
ispartof | The spine journal, 2011-10, Vol.11 (10), p.942-946 |
issn | 1529-9430 1878-1632 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_899133935 |
source | MEDLINE; ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present) |
subjects | Cobb angle Digital photography Humans Lumbar Vertebrae - diagnostic imaging Orthopedics Radiographic Image Enhancement - methods Reproducibility of Results Retrospective Studies Scoliosis Scoliosis - diagnostic imaging Teleradiology Thoracic Vertebrae - diagnostic imaging Validation |
title | Validity of Cobb angle measurements using digitally photographed radiographs |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-16T08%3A01%3A15IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Validity%20of%20Cobb%20angle%20measurements%20using%20digitally%20photographed%20radiographs&rft.jtitle=The%20spine%20journal&rft.au=Ricart,%20Pedro%20A.,%20MD&rft.date=2011-10-01&rft.volume=11&rft.issue=10&rft.spage=942&rft.epage=946&rft.pages=942-946&rft.issn=1529-9430&rft.eissn=1878-1632&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.spinee.2011.09.003&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E899133935%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=899133935&rft_id=info:pmid/22005079&rft_els_id=S1529943011011636&rfr_iscdi=true |