Effect of Cigarette Menthol Content on Mainstream Smoke Emissions

The 2009 Family Smoking Prevention and Tobacco Control Act empowered the U.S. Food and Drug Administration to study “the impact of the use of menthol in cigarettes on the public health, including such use among children, African Americans, Hispanics and other racial and ethnic minorities,” and devel...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Chemical research in toxicology 2011-10, Vol.24 (10), p.1744-1753
Hauptverfasser: Gordon, S. M, Brinkman, M. C, Meng, R. Q, Anderson, G. M, Chuang, J. C, Kroeger, R. R, Reyes, I. L, Clark, P. I
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1753
container_issue 10
container_start_page 1744
container_title Chemical research in toxicology
container_volume 24
creator Gordon, S. M
Brinkman, M. C
Meng, R. Q
Anderson, G. M
Chuang, J. C
Kroeger, R. R
Reyes, I. L
Clark, P. I
description The 2009 Family Smoking Prevention and Tobacco Control Act empowered the U.S. Food and Drug Administration to study “the impact of the use of menthol in cigarettes on the public health, including such use among children, African Americans, Hispanics and other racial and ethnic minorities,” and develop recommendations. Current scientific evidence comparing human exposures between menthol and nonmenthol smokers shows mixed results. This is largely because of the many differences between commercial menthol and nonmenthol cigarettes other than their menthol content. We conducted an innovative study using two types of test cigarettes: a commercial nonmenthol brand that we mentholated at four different levels, and Camel Crush, a commercial cigarette containing a small capsule in the filter that releases menthol solution into the filter when crushed. Cigarettes were machine-smoked at each of the menthol levels investigated, and the total particulate matter (TPM) was collected on a quartz fiber filter pad and analyzed by gas chromatography/mass spectrometry for menthol, nicotine, tobacco-specific nitrosamines (TSNAs), polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs), cotinine, and quinoline. The mainstream smoke was also monitored continuously in real time on a puff-by-puff basis for seven gas-phase constituents (acetaldehyde, acetonitrile, acrylonitrile, benzene, 1,3-butadiene, isoprene, and 2,5-dimethylfuran), using a proton transfer reaction-mass spectrometer. Average yields (in micrograms/cigarette) for the analytes were determined. Menthol in the TPM samples increased linearly with applied menthol concentration, but the amounts of nicotine along with the target TSNAs, PAHs, cotinine, and quinoline in the cigarettes remained essentially unchanged. Similarly, yields of the targeted volatile organic compounds (VOCs) in whole smoke from the mentholated nonmenthol cigarettes that were measured in real-time were largely unaffected by their menthol levels. In the Camel Crush cigarettes, however, the VOC yields appeared to increase in the presence of menthol, especially in the gas phase. Although we succeeded in characterizing key mainstream smoke constituents in cigarettes that differ only in menthol content, further study is needed to definitively answer whether menthol affects exposure to selected cigarette constituents and thereby influences harm.
doi_str_mv 10.1021/tx200285s
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_899130994</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1524425241</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a347t-7a97513f1e22f769c65c02ed39f316d8b12b136e1b756675f89c45b4a879c2ec3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp90E1LwzAAxvEgipvTg19AchH1UM1L0yTHUeYLbHhQwVtJs0Q720aTFPTbG9ncSbwkOfx4CH8AjjG6xIjgq_hJECKChR0wxoygjCGMdsEYCUkzQsTzCByEsEIIJ873wYhgIQSV-RhMZ9YaHaGzsGxelDcxGrgwfXx1LSxdH9MTuh4uVNOH6I3q4EPn3gycdU0IjevDIdizqg3maHNPwNP17LG8zeb3N3fldJ4pmvOYcSU5w9RiQ4jlhdQF04iYJZWW4mIpakxqTAuDa86KgjMrpM5ZnSvBpSZG0wk4W---e_cxmBCr9ANt2lb1xg2hElJiiqTMkzz_V6ZEeU7SgRO9WFPtXQje2OrdN53yXxVG1U_bats22ZPN7FB3ZrmVvzETOF0DpUO1coPvU48_hr4BPl1-hA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1524425241</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Effect of Cigarette Menthol Content on Mainstream Smoke Emissions</title><source>ACS Publications</source><source>MEDLINE</source><creator>Gordon, S. M ; Brinkman, M. C ; Meng, R. Q ; Anderson, G. M ; Chuang, J. C ; Kroeger, R. R ; Reyes, I. L ; Clark, P. I</creator><creatorcontrib>Gordon, S. M ; Brinkman, M. C ; Meng, R. Q ; Anderson, G. M ; Chuang, J. C ; Kroeger, R. R ; Reyes, I. L ; Clark, P. I</creatorcontrib><description>The 2009 Family Smoking Prevention and Tobacco Control Act empowered the U.S. Food and Drug Administration to study “the impact of the use of menthol in cigarettes on the public health, including such use among children, African Americans, Hispanics and other racial and ethnic minorities,” and develop recommendations. Current scientific evidence comparing human exposures between menthol and nonmenthol smokers shows mixed results. This is largely because of the many differences between commercial menthol and nonmenthol cigarettes other than their menthol content. We conducted an innovative study using two types of test cigarettes: a commercial nonmenthol brand that we mentholated at four different levels, and Camel Crush, a commercial cigarette containing a small capsule in the filter that releases menthol solution into the filter when crushed. Cigarettes were machine-smoked at each of the menthol levels investigated, and the total particulate matter (TPM) was collected on a quartz fiber filter pad and analyzed by gas chromatography/mass spectrometry for menthol, nicotine, tobacco-specific nitrosamines (TSNAs), polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs), cotinine, and quinoline. The mainstream smoke was also monitored continuously in real time on a puff-by-puff basis for seven gas-phase constituents (acetaldehyde, acetonitrile, acrylonitrile, benzene, 1,3-butadiene, isoprene, and 2,5-dimethylfuran), using a proton transfer reaction-mass spectrometer. Average yields (in micrograms/cigarette) for the analytes were determined. Menthol in the TPM samples increased linearly with applied menthol concentration, but the amounts of nicotine along with the target TSNAs, PAHs, cotinine, and quinoline in the cigarettes remained essentially unchanged. Similarly, yields of the targeted volatile organic compounds (VOCs) in whole smoke from the mentholated nonmenthol cigarettes that were measured in real-time were largely unaffected by their menthol levels. In the Camel Crush cigarettes, however, the VOC yields appeared to increase in the presence of menthol, especially in the gas phase. Although we succeeded in characterizing key mainstream smoke constituents in cigarettes that differ only in menthol content, further study is needed to definitively answer whether menthol affects exposure to selected cigarette constituents and thereby influences harm.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0893-228X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1520-5010</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1021/tx200285s</identifier><identifier>PMID: 21888394</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: American Chemical Society</publisher><subject>Air Pollutants - analysis ; Air Pollutants - chemistry ; Flavoring Agents - analysis ; Flavoring Agents - chemistry ; Mass Spectrometry - methods ; Menthol - analysis ; Menthol - chemistry ; Smoking ; Tobacco Smoke Pollution - analysis ; Volatile Organic Compounds - analysis ; Volatile Organic Compounds - chemistry</subject><ispartof>Chemical research in toxicology, 2011-10, Vol.24 (10), p.1744-1753</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2011 American Chemical Society</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a347t-7a97513f1e22f769c65c02ed39f316d8b12b136e1b756675f89c45b4a879c2ec3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a347t-7a97513f1e22f769c65c02ed39f316d8b12b136e1b756675f89c45b4a879c2ec3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://pubs.acs.org/doi/pdf/10.1021/tx200285s$$EPDF$$P50$$Gacs$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/tx200285s$$EHTML$$P50$$Gacs$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,2752,27053,27901,27902,56713,56763</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21888394$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Gordon, S. M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brinkman, M. C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Meng, R. Q</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Anderson, G. M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chuang, J. C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kroeger, R. R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reyes, I. L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Clark, P. I</creatorcontrib><title>Effect of Cigarette Menthol Content on Mainstream Smoke Emissions</title><title>Chemical research in toxicology</title><addtitle>Chem. Res. Toxicol</addtitle><description>The 2009 Family Smoking Prevention and Tobacco Control Act empowered the U.S. Food and Drug Administration to study “the impact of the use of menthol in cigarettes on the public health, including such use among children, African Americans, Hispanics and other racial and ethnic minorities,” and develop recommendations. Current scientific evidence comparing human exposures between menthol and nonmenthol smokers shows mixed results. This is largely because of the many differences between commercial menthol and nonmenthol cigarettes other than their menthol content. We conducted an innovative study using two types of test cigarettes: a commercial nonmenthol brand that we mentholated at four different levels, and Camel Crush, a commercial cigarette containing a small capsule in the filter that releases menthol solution into the filter when crushed. Cigarettes were machine-smoked at each of the menthol levels investigated, and the total particulate matter (TPM) was collected on a quartz fiber filter pad and analyzed by gas chromatography/mass spectrometry for menthol, nicotine, tobacco-specific nitrosamines (TSNAs), polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs), cotinine, and quinoline. The mainstream smoke was also monitored continuously in real time on a puff-by-puff basis for seven gas-phase constituents (acetaldehyde, acetonitrile, acrylonitrile, benzene, 1,3-butadiene, isoprene, and 2,5-dimethylfuran), using a proton transfer reaction-mass spectrometer. Average yields (in micrograms/cigarette) for the analytes were determined. Menthol in the TPM samples increased linearly with applied menthol concentration, but the amounts of nicotine along with the target TSNAs, PAHs, cotinine, and quinoline in the cigarettes remained essentially unchanged. Similarly, yields of the targeted volatile organic compounds (VOCs) in whole smoke from the mentholated nonmenthol cigarettes that were measured in real-time were largely unaffected by their menthol levels. In the Camel Crush cigarettes, however, the VOC yields appeared to increase in the presence of menthol, especially in the gas phase. Although we succeeded in characterizing key mainstream smoke constituents in cigarettes that differ only in menthol content, further study is needed to definitively answer whether menthol affects exposure to selected cigarette constituents and thereby influences harm.</description><subject>Air Pollutants - analysis</subject><subject>Air Pollutants - chemistry</subject><subject>Flavoring Agents - analysis</subject><subject>Flavoring Agents - chemistry</subject><subject>Mass Spectrometry - methods</subject><subject>Menthol - analysis</subject><subject>Menthol - chemistry</subject><subject>Smoking</subject><subject>Tobacco Smoke Pollution - analysis</subject><subject>Volatile Organic Compounds - analysis</subject><subject>Volatile Organic Compounds - chemistry</subject><issn>0893-228X</issn><issn>1520-5010</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2011</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp90E1LwzAAxvEgipvTg19AchH1UM1L0yTHUeYLbHhQwVtJs0Q720aTFPTbG9ncSbwkOfx4CH8AjjG6xIjgq_hJECKChR0wxoygjCGMdsEYCUkzQsTzCByEsEIIJ873wYhgIQSV-RhMZ9YaHaGzsGxelDcxGrgwfXx1LSxdH9MTuh4uVNOH6I3q4EPn3gycdU0IjevDIdizqg3maHNPwNP17LG8zeb3N3fldJ4pmvOYcSU5w9RiQ4jlhdQF04iYJZWW4mIpakxqTAuDa86KgjMrpM5ZnSvBpSZG0wk4W---e_cxmBCr9ANt2lb1xg2hElJiiqTMkzz_V6ZEeU7SgRO9WFPtXQje2OrdN53yXxVG1U_bats22ZPN7FB3ZrmVvzETOF0DpUO1coPvU48_hr4BPl1-hA</recordid><startdate>20111017</startdate><enddate>20111017</enddate><creator>Gordon, S. M</creator><creator>Brinkman, M. C</creator><creator>Meng, R. Q</creator><creator>Anderson, G. M</creator><creator>Chuang, J. C</creator><creator>Kroeger, R. R</creator><creator>Reyes, I. L</creator><creator>Clark, P. I</creator><general>American Chemical Society</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20111017</creationdate><title>Effect of Cigarette Menthol Content on Mainstream Smoke Emissions</title><author>Gordon, S. M ; Brinkman, M. C ; Meng, R. Q ; Anderson, G. M ; Chuang, J. C ; Kroeger, R. R ; Reyes, I. L ; Clark, P. I</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a347t-7a97513f1e22f769c65c02ed39f316d8b12b136e1b756675f89c45b4a879c2ec3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2011</creationdate><topic>Air Pollutants - analysis</topic><topic>Air Pollutants - chemistry</topic><topic>Flavoring Agents - analysis</topic><topic>Flavoring Agents - chemistry</topic><topic>Mass Spectrometry - methods</topic><topic>Menthol - analysis</topic><topic>Menthol - chemistry</topic><topic>Smoking</topic><topic>Tobacco Smoke Pollution - analysis</topic><topic>Volatile Organic Compounds - analysis</topic><topic>Volatile Organic Compounds - chemistry</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Gordon, S. M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brinkman, M. C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Meng, R. Q</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Anderson, G. M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chuang, J. C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kroeger, R. R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reyes, I. L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Clark, P. I</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Chemical research in toxicology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Gordon, S. M</au><au>Brinkman, M. C</au><au>Meng, R. Q</au><au>Anderson, G. M</au><au>Chuang, J. C</au><au>Kroeger, R. R</au><au>Reyes, I. L</au><au>Clark, P. I</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Effect of Cigarette Menthol Content on Mainstream Smoke Emissions</atitle><jtitle>Chemical research in toxicology</jtitle><addtitle>Chem. Res. Toxicol</addtitle><date>2011-10-17</date><risdate>2011</risdate><volume>24</volume><issue>10</issue><spage>1744</spage><epage>1753</epage><pages>1744-1753</pages><issn>0893-228X</issn><eissn>1520-5010</eissn><abstract>The 2009 Family Smoking Prevention and Tobacco Control Act empowered the U.S. Food and Drug Administration to study “the impact of the use of menthol in cigarettes on the public health, including such use among children, African Americans, Hispanics and other racial and ethnic minorities,” and develop recommendations. Current scientific evidence comparing human exposures between menthol and nonmenthol smokers shows mixed results. This is largely because of the many differences between commercial menthol and nonmenthol cigarettes other than their menthol content. We conducted an innovative study using two types of test cigarettes: a commercial nonmenthol brand that we mentholated at four different levels, and Camel Crush, a commercial cigarette containing a small capsule in the filter that releases menthol solution into the filter when crushed. Cigarettes were machine-smoked at each of the menthol levels investigated, and the total particulate matter (TPM) was collected on a quartz fiber filter pad and analyzed by gas chromatography/mass spectrometry for menthol, nicotine, tobacco-specific nitrosamines (TSNAs), polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs), cotinine, and quinoline. The mainstream smoke was also monitored continuously in real time on a puff-by-puff basis for seven gas-phase constituents (acetaldehyde, acetonitrile, acrylonitrile, benzene, 1,3-butadiene, isoprene, and 2,5-dimethylfuran), using a proton transfer reaction-mass spectrometer. Average yields (in micrograms/cigarette) for the analytes were determined. Menthol in the TPM samples increased linearly with applied menthol concentration, but the amounts of nicotine along with the target TSNAs, PAHs, cotinine, and quinoline in the cigarettes remained essentially unchanged. Similarly, yields of the targeted volatile organic compounds (VOCs) in whole smoke from the mentholated nonmenthol cigarettes that were measured in real-time were largely unaffected by their menthol levels. In the Camel Crush cigarettes, however, the VOC yields appeared to increase in the presence of menthol, especially in the gas phase. Although we succeeded in characterizing key mainstream smoke constituents in cigarettes that differ only in menthol content, further study is needed to definitively answer whether menthol affects exposure to selected cigarette constituents and thereby influences harm.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>American Chemical Society</pub><pmid>21888394</pmid><doi>10.1021/tx200285s</doi><tpages>10</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0893-228X
ispartof Chemical research in toxicology, 2011-10, Vol.24 (10), p.1744-1753
issn 0893-228X
1520-5010
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_899130994
source ACS Publications; MEDLINE
subjects Air Pollutants - analysis
Air Pollutants - chemistry
Flavoring Agents - analysis
Flavoring Agents - chemistry
Mass Spectrometry - methods
Menthol - analysis
Menthol - chemistry
Smoking
Tobacco Smoke Pollution - analysis
Volatile Organic Compounds - analysis
Volatile Organic Compounds - chemistry
title Effect of Cigarette Menthol Content on Mainstream Smoke Emissions
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-09T17%3A12%3A26IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Effect%20of%20Cigarette%20Menthol%20Content%20on%20Mainstream%20Smoke%20Emissions&rft.jtitle=Chemical%20research%20in%20toxicology&rft.au=Gordon,%20S.%20M&rft.date=2011-10-17&rft.volume=24&rft.issue=10&rft.spage=1744&rft.epage=1753&rft.pages=1744-1753&rft.issn=0893-228X&rft.eissn=1520-5010&rft_id=info:doi/10.1021/tx200285s&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1524425241%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1524425241&rft_id=info:pmid/21888394&rfr_iscdi=true