The Predictive Value of General Surgery Application Data for Future Resident Performance

Objective The predictive value of application data for future general surgery resident performance and attrition are poorly understood. We sought to determine what variables obtained in the application process might predict future resident success. Methods We performed an 18-year review (1990-2008)...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of surgical education 2011-11, Vol.68 (6), p.513-518
Hauptverfasser: Alterman, Daniel Mark, MD, Jones, Thomas M., MD, Heidel, Robert E., MS, Daley, Brian J., MD, Goldman, Mitchell H., MD
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 518
container_issue 6
container_start_page 513
container_title Journal of surgical education
container_volume 68
creator Alterman, Daniel Mark, MD
Jones, Thomas M., MD
Heidel, Robert E., MS
Daley, Brian J., MD
Goldman, Mitchell H., MD
description Objective The predictive value of application data for future general surgery resident performance and attrition are poorly understood. We sought to determine what variables obtained in the application process might predict future resident success. Methods We performed an 18-year review (1990-2008) of all matched residents (n = 101) to a university program. Both categorical graduates (CG) and nongraduates (CNG) and nondesignated preliminaries matching (PM) and preliminaries nonmatching (PNM) were evaluated. We also screened for previous high-performance accomplishments outside of the medical field such as in the performing arts or collegiate athletics (SKILL). Outcome data include graduation or match status, American Board of Surgery In-service Training Examination (ABSITE), and faculty Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) core competency evaluations. Results Background data from the Electronic Residency Application Service (ERAS) application between the various groups was compared with univariate analysis and logistic regression. There were significant differences between the groups on the measures of USMLE step 1 (STEP1) (p = 0.001), medical school grade point average (GPA) (p = 0.023), interview data (INTERVIEW) (p < 0.001), and ABSITE (p < 0.001). The variable of INTERVIEW had an odds ratio of 188.27 (95% confidence interval, 3.757-9435.405). Overall attrition was 23.7% (n = 24) and was evenly divided between those who left for lifestyle reasons and those who were encouraged to leave. Conclusions Within our system, INTERVIEW, USMLE STEP1, and SKILL predict successful completion of a general surgery residency. In contrast to prior reports, female sex, ethnicity, medical school grades, or Alpha Omega Alpha Honor Society (AOA) status were not significant. The variable SKILL is novel and highlights the importance of nonacademic background data. Our data indicate STEP1 is an independent predictor of resident success in general surgery and should maintain an important role in general surgery applicant screening. The ideal screening threshold is likely > 215.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.jsurg.2011.07.007
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_898841848</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S1931720411002285</els_id><sourcerecordid>898841848</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c413t-29b0adca3a15c5a3875fa70f65466ae39feed9e4e3e5f87542bc1f35fa4e6e093</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkUlP5DAQRi00iP0XII18m1NCeUniHGYkxLBJSCA2cbPcTplxJp302AlS_3vcNHCYCydv76uSXxFyyCBnwMqjNm_jFJ5zDozlUOUA1QbZYapSWSUL_i3ta8GyioPcJrsxtgCFrHm9RbY5h3QQaoc83f9BehOw8Xb0L0gfTTchHRw9xx6D6ehdaoFhSY8Xi85bM_qhp7_NaKgbAj2bxikgvcXoG-xHeoMhXc9Nb3GfbDrTRTx4X_fIw9np_clFdnV9fnlyfJVZycSY8XoGprFGGFbYwghVFc5U4MpClqVBUTvEpkaJAguXHiWfWeZEgiSWCLXYIz_WdRdh-DdhHPXcR4tdZ3ocpqhVrZRkSqpEijVpwxBjQKcXwc9NWGoGemVUt_rNqF4Z1VDpZDSlvr_Xn2ZzbD4zHwoT8HMNYPrli8ego_WYDDQ-oB11M_gvGvz6L2873yfV3V9cYmyHKfRJoGY6cg36bjXU1UwZA-BcFeIVveSd6w</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>898841848</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The Predictive Value of General Surgery Application Data for Future Resident Performance</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)</source><creator>Alterman, Daniel Mark, MD ; Jones, Thomas M., MD ; Heidel, Robert E., MS ; Daley, Brian J., MD ; Goldman, Mitchell H., MD</creator><creatorcontrib>Alterman, Daniel Mark, MD ; Jones, Thomas M., MD ; Heidel, Robert E., MS ; Daley, Brian J., MD ; Goldman, Mitchell H., MD</creatorcontrib><description>Objective The predictive value of application data for future general surgery resident performance and attrition are poorly understood. We sought to determine what variables obtained in the application process might predict future resident success. Methods We performed an 18-year review (1990-2008) of all matched residents (n = 101) to a university program. Both categorical graduates (CG) and nongraduates (CNG) and nondesignated preliminaries matching (PM) and preliminaries nonmatching (PNM) were evaluated. We also screened for previous high-performance accomplishments outside of the medical field such as in the performing arts or collegiate athletics (SKILL). Outcome data include graduation or match status, American Board of Surgery In-service Training Examination (ABSITE), and faculty Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) core competency evaluations. Results Background data from the Electronic Residency Application Service (ERAS) application between the various groups was compared with univariate analysis and logistic regression. There were significant differences between the groups on the measures of USMLE step 1 (STEP1) (p = 0.001), medical school grade point average (GPA) (p = 0.023), interview data (INTERVIEW) (p &lt; 0.001), and ABSITE (p &lt; 0.001). The variable of INTERVIEW had an odds ratio of 188.27 (95% confidence interval, 3.757-9435.405). Overall attrition was 23.7% (n = 24) and was evenly divided between those who left for lifestyle reasons and those who were encouraged to leave. Conclusions Within our system, INTERVIEW, USMLE STEP1, and SKILL predict successful completion of a general surgery residency. In contrast to prior reports, female sex, ethnicity, medical school grades, or Alpha Omega Alpha Honor Society (AOA) status were not significant. The variable SKILL is novel and highlights the importance of nonacademic background data. Our data indicate STEP1 is an independent predictor of resident success in general surgery and should maintain an important role in general surgery applicant screening. The ideal screening threshold is likely &gt; 215.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1931-7204</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1878-7452</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2011.07.007</identifier><identifier>PMID: 22000538</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Adult ; Clinical Competence ; Female ; Forecasting ; General Surgery ; Humans ; Internship and Residency ; Job Application ; Male ; Professionalism ; residency application ; resident evaluation ; Retrospective Studies ; Surgery</subject><ispartof>Journal of surgical education, 2011-11, Vol.68 (6), p.513-518</ispartof><rights>Association of Program Directors in Surgery</rights><rights>2011 Association of Program Directors in Surgery</rights><rights>Copyright © 2011 Association of Program Directors in Surgery. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c413t-29b0adca3a15c5a3875fa70f65466ae39feed9e4e3e5f87542bc1f35fa4e6e093</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c413t-29b0adca3a15c5a3875fa70f65466ae39feed9e4e3e5f87542bc1f35fa4e6e093</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jsurg.2011.07.007$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22000538$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Alterman, Daniel Mark, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jones, Thomas M., MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Heidel, Robert E., MS</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Daley, Brian J., MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Goldman, Mitchell H., MD</creatorcontrib><title>The Predictive Value of General Surgery Application Data for Future Resident Performance</title><title>Journal of surgical education</title><addtitle>J Surg Educ</addtitle><description>Objective The predictive value of application data for future general surgery resident performance and attrition are poorly understood. We sought to determine what variables obtained in the application process might predict future resident success. Methods We performed an 18-year review (1990-2008) of all matched residents (n = 101) to a university program. Both categorical graduates (CG) and nongraduates (CNG) and nondesignated preliminaries matching (PM) and preliminaries nonmatching (PNM) were evaluated. We also screened for previous high-performance accomplishments outside of the medical field such as in the performing arts or collegiate athletics (SKILL). Outcome data include graduation or match status, American Board of Surgery In-service Training Examination (ABSITE), and faculty Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) core competency evaluations. Results Background data from the Electronic Residency Application Service (ERAS) application between the various groups was compared with univariate analysis and logistic regression. There were significant differences between the groups on the measures of USMLE step 1 (STEP1) (p = 0.001), medical school grade point average (GPA) (p = 0.023), interview data (INTERVIEW) (p &lt; 0.001), and ABSITE (p &lt; 0.001). The variable of INTERVIEW had an odds ratio of 188.27 (95% confidence interval, 3.757-9435.405). Overall attrition was 23.7% (n = 24) and was evenly divided between those who left for lifestyle reasons and those who were encouraged to leave. Conclusions Within our system, INTERVIEW, USMLE STEP1, and SKILL predict successful completion of a general surgery residency. In contrast to prior reports, female sex, ethnicity, medical school grades, or Alpha Omega Alpha Honor Society (AOA) status were not significant. The variable SKILL is novel and highlights the importance of nonacademic background data. Our data indicate STEP1 is an independent predictor of resident success in general surgery and should maintain an important role in general surgery applicant screening. The ideal screening threshold is likely &gt; 215.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Clinical Competence</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Forecasting</subject><subject>General Surgery</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Internship and Residency</subject><subject>Job Application</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Professionalism</subject><subject>residency application</subject><subject>resident evaluation</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Surgery</subject><issn>1931-7204</issn><issn>1878-7452</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2011</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkUlP5DAQRi00iP0XII18m1NCeUniHGYkxLBJSCA2cbPcTplxJp302AlS_3vcNHCYCydv76uSXxFyyCBnwMqjNm_jFJ5zDozlUOUA1QbZYapSWSUL_i3ta8GyioPcJrsxtgCFrHm9RbY5h3QQaoc83f9BehOw8Xb0L0gfTTchHRw9xx6D6ehdaoFhSY8Xi85bM_qhp7_NaKgbAj2bxikgvcXoG-xHeoMhXc9Nb3GfbDrTRTx4X_fIw9np_clFdnV9fnlyfJVZycSY8XoGprFGGFbYwghVFc5U4MpClqVBUTvEpkaJAguXHiWfWeZEgiSWCLXYIz_WdRdh-DdhHPXcR4tdZ3ocpqhVrZRkSqpEijVpwxBjQKcXwc9NWGoGemVUt_rNqF4Z1VDpZDSlvr_Xn2ZzbD4zHwoT8HMNYPrli8ego_WYDDQ-oB11M_gvGvz6L2873yfV3V9cYmyHKfRJoGY6cg36bjXU1UwZA-BcFeIVveSd6w</recordid><startdate>20111101</startdate><enddate>20111101</enddate><creator>Alterman, Daniel Mark, MD</creator><creator>Jones, Thomas M., MD</creator><creator>Heidel, Robert E., MS</creator><creator>Daley, Brian J., MD</creator><creator>Goldman, Mitchell H., MD</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20111101</creationdate><title>The Predictive Value of General Surgery Application Data for Future Resident Performance</title><author>Alterman, Daniel Mark, MD ; Jones, Thomas M., MD ; Heidel, Robert E., MS ; Daley, Brian J., MD ; Goldman, Mitchell H., MD</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c413t-29b0adca3a15c5a3875fa70f65466ae39feed9e4e3e5f87542bc1f35fa4e6e093</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2011</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Clinical Competence</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Forecasting</topic><topic>General Surgery</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Internship and Residency</topic><topic>Job Application</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Professionalism</topic><topic>residency application</topic><topic>resident evaluation</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Surgery</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Alterman, Daniel Mark, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jones, Thomas M., MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Heidel, Robert E., MS</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Daley, Brian J., MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Goldman, Mitchell H., MD</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of surgical education</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Alterman, Daniel Mark, MD</au><au>Jones, Thomas M., MD</au><au>Heidel, Robert E., MS</au><au>Daley, Brian J., MD</au><au>Goldman, Mitchell H., MD</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The Predictive Value of General Surgery Application Data for Future Resident Performance</atitle><jtitle>Journal of surgical education</jtitle><addtitle>J Surg Educ</addtitle><date>2011-11-01</date><risdate>2011</risdate><volume>68</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>513</spage><epage>518</epage><pages>513-518</pages><issn>1931-7204</issn><eissn>1878-7452</eissn><abstract>Objective The predictive value of application data for future general surgery resident performance and attrition are poorly understood. We sought to determine what variables obtained in the application process might predict future resident success. Methods We performed an 18-year review (1990-2008) of all matched residents (n = 101) to a university program. Both categorical graduates (CG) and nongraduates (CNG) and nondesignated preliminaries matching (PM) and preliminaries nonmatching (PNM) were evaluated. We also screened for previous high-performance accomplishments outside of the medical field such as in the performing arts or collegiate athletics (SKILL). Outcome data include graduation or match status, American Board of Surgery In-service Training Examination (ABSITE), and faculty Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) core competency evaluations. Results Background data from the Electronic Residency Application Service (ERAS) application between the various groups was compared with univariate analysis and logistic regression. There were significant differences between the groups on the measures of USMLE step 1 (STEP1) (p = 0.001), medical school grade point average (GPA) (p = 0.023), interview data (INTERVIEW) (p &lt; 0.001), and ABSITE (p &lt; 0.001). The variable of INTERVIEW had an odds ratio of 188.27 (95% confidence interval, 3.757-9435.405). Overall attrition was 23.7% (n = 24) and was evenly divided between those who left for lifestyle reasons and those who were encouraged to leave. Conclusions Within our system, INTERVIEW, USMLE STEP1, and SKILL predict successful completion of a general surgery residency. In contrast to prior reports, female sex, ethnicity, medical school grades, or Alpha Omega Alpha Honor Society (AOA) status were not significant. The variable SKILL is novel and highlights the importance of nonacademic background data. Our data indicate STEP1 is an independent predictor of resident success in general surgery and should maintain an important role in general surgery applicant screening. The ideal screening threshold is likely &gt; 215.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>22000538</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.jsurg.2011.07.007</doi><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1931-7204
ispartof Journal of surgical education, 2011-11, Vol.68 (6), p.513-518
issn 1931-7204
1878-7452
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_898841848
source MEDLINE; Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)
subjects Adult
Clinical Competence
Female
Forecasting
General Surgery
Humans
Internship and Residency
Job Application
Male
Professionalism
residency application
resident evaluation
Retrospective Studies
Surgery
title The Predictive Value of General Surgery Application Data for Future Resident Performance
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-19T09%3A29%3A05IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20Predictive%20Value%20of%20General%20Surgery%20Application%20Data%20for%20Future%20Resident%20Performance&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20surgical%20education&rft.au=Alterman,%20Daniel%20Mark,%20MD&rft.date=2011-11-01&rft.volume=68&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=513&rft.epage=518&rft.pages=513-518&rft.issn=1931-7204&rft.eissn=1878-7452&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.jsurg.2011.07.007&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E898841848%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=898841848&rft_id=info:pmid/22000538&rft_els_id=S1931720411002285&rfr_iscdi=true