Is high-dose nafamostat mesilate effective for the prevention of post-ERCP pancreatitis, especially in high-risk patients?

Infusion of the protease inhibitor nafamostat mesilate (20 mg) effectively prevents post-ERCP pancreatitis, but only in low-risk groups. This study was performed to evaluate the use of high-dose nafamostat mesilate (50 mg) for prevention of post-ERCP pancreatitis (PEP), especially in high-risk group...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Pancreas 2011-11, Vol.40 (8), p.1215-1219
Hauptverfasser: Park, Kee Tae, Kang, Dae Hwan, Choi, Cheol Woong, Cho, Mong, Park, Su Bum, Kim, Hyung Wook, Kim, Dong Uk, Chung, Chung Wook, Yoon, Ki Tae
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1219
container_issue 8
container_start_page 1215
container_title Pancreas
container_volume 40
creator Park, Kee Tae
Kang, Dae Hwan
Choi, Cheol Woong
Cho, Mong
Park, Su Bum
Kim, Hyung Wook
Kim, Dong Uk
Chung, Chung Wook
Yoon, Ki Tae
description Infusion of the protease inhibitor nafamostat mesilate (20 mg) effectively prevents post-ERCP pancreatitis, but only in low-risk groups. This study was performed to evaluate the use of high-dose nafamostat mesilate (50 mg) for prevention of post-ERCP pancreatitis (PEP), especially in high-risk groups. A total of 608 patients who underwent ERCP were included; 13 patients were excluded. Patients were divided into 3 groups: controls (group A), infusion with 20 mg of nafamostat mesilate (group B), or infusion with 50 mg of nafamostat mesilate (group C). The incidence of PEP was analyzed. The overall incidence of acute pancreatitis was 7.4% (44/595). There was a significant difference in the incidence of PEP with or without nafamostat mesilate (13.0% vs 4.0% and 5.1%, respectively; P < 0.0001). Subgroup analysis showed that in low-risk patients, the rate of PEP was significantly different with nafamostat (11.9% vs 2.7% and 4.0%, respectively; P = 0.007). In high-risk patients, the rate of PEP was not significantly different among treatment groups (14.6% vs 5.9% vs 6.9%, respectively; P = 0.108). Nafamostat mesilate prophylaxis (20 or 50 mg) is effective in preventing post-ERCP pancreatitis. However, the preventive effect of high-dose nafamostat mesilate (50 mg) is not significant in high-risk patients.
doi_str_mv 10.1097/MPA.0b013e31822116d5
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_898840825</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>898840825</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c372t-adf17e576b32be71d67e4dabdec3466ccb6671adea4dfe1e5855db23bc5c59843</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkEtLAzEUhYMotlb_gUh2bpyaTCaTzEpK8VFQLKLrIZPc2Oi8TFKh_npHWl24unD5zjnwIXRKyZSSQlw-LGdTUhHKgFGZppTmhu-hMeUsTzKZyn00JlLyhFEhRugohDdCqGC8OESjdPjxgsox-loEvHKvq8R0AXCrrGq6EFXEDQRXqwgYrAUd3Sdg23kcV4B7D5_QRte1uLO4H_jk-mm-xL1qtQcVXXThAkPoQTtV1xvs2u2Gd-F9oKIb0uHqGB1YVQc42d0Jerm5fp7fJfePt4v57D7RTKQxUcZSAVzkFUsrENTkAjKjKgOaZXmudZXngioDKjMWKHDJualSVmmueSEzNkHn297edx9rCLFsXNBQ16qFbh1KWUiZEZnygcy2pPZdCB5s2XvXKL8pKSl_pJeD9PK_9CF2thtYVw2Yv9CvZfYN1O6BEg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>898840825</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Is high-dose nafamostat mesilate effective for the prevention of post-ERCP pancreatitis, especially in high-risk patients?</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Journals@Ovid Complete</source><creator>Park, Kee Tae ; Kang, Dae Hwan ; Choi, Cheol Woong ; Cho, Mong ; Park, Su Bum ; Kim, Hyung Wook ; Kim, Dong Uk ; Chung, Chung Wook ; Yoon, Ki Tae</creator><creatorcontrib>Park, Kee Tae ; Kang, Dae Hwan ; Choi, Cheol Woong ; Cho, Mong ; Park, Su Bum ; Kim, Hyung Wook ; Kim, Dong Uk ; Chung, Chung Wook ; Yoon, Ki Tae</creatorcontrib><description>Infusion of the protease inhibitor nafamostat mesilate (20 mg) effectively prevents post-ERCP pancreatitis, but only in low-risk groups. This study was performed to evaluate the use of high-dose nafamostat mesilate (50 mg) for prevention of post-ERCP pancreatitis (PEP), especially in high-risk groups. A total of 608 patients who underwent ERCP were included; 13 patients were excluded. Patients were divided into 3 groups: controls (group A), infusion with 20 mg of nafamostat mesilate (group B), or infusion with 50 mg of nafamostat mesilate (group C). The incidence of PEP was analyzed. The overall incidence of acute pancreatitis was 7.4% (44/595). There was a significant difference in the incidence of PEP with or without nafamostat mesilate (13.0% vs 4.0% and 5.1%, respectively; P &lt; 0.0001). Subgroup analysis showed that in low-risk patients, the rate of PEP was significantly different with nafamostat (11.9% vs 2.7% and 4.0%, respectively; P = 0.007). In high-risk patients, the rate of PEP was not significantly different among treatment groups (14.6% vs 5.9% vs 6.9%, respectively; P = 0.108). Nafamostat mesilate prophylaxis (20 or 50 mg) is effective in preventing post-ERCP pancreatitis. However, the preventive effect of high-dose nafamostat mesilate (50 mg) is not significant in high-risk patients.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0885-3177</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1536-4828</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1097/MPA.0b013e31822116d5</identifier><identifier>PMID: 21775918</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States</publisher><subject>Acute Disease ; Aged ; Amylases - blood ; Cholangiopancreatography, Endoscopic Retrograde - adverse effects ; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug ; Drug Administration Schedule ; Female ; Guanidines - administration &amp; dosage ; Guanidines - therapeutic use ; Humans ; Infusions, Intravenous ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Pancreatitis - blood ; Pancreatitis - etiology ; Pancreatitis - prevention &amp; control ; Prospective Studies ; Protease Inhibitors - administration &amp; dosage ; Protease Inhibitors - therapeutic use ; Risk Factors ; Time Factors ; Treatment Outcome</subject><ispartof>Pancreas, 2011-11, Vol.40 (8), p.1215-1219</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c372t-adf17e576b32be71d67e4dabdec3466ccb6671adea4dfe1e5855db23bc5c59843</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c372t-adf17e576b32be71d67e4dabdec3466ccb6671adea4dfe1e5855db23bc5c59843</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21775918$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Park, Kee Tae</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kang, Dae Hwan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Choi, Cheol Woong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cho, Mong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Park, Su Bum</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Hyung Wook</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Dong Uk</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chung, Chung Wook</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yoon, Ki Tae</creatorcontrib><title>Is high-dose nafamostat mesilate effective for the prevention of post-ERCP pancreatitis, especially in high-risk patients?</title><title>Pancreas</title><addtitle>Pancreas</addtitle><description>Infusion of the protease inhibitor nafamostat mesilate (20 mg) effectively prevents post-ERCP pancreatitis, but only in low-risk groups. This study was performed to evaluate the use of high-dose nafamostat mesilate (50 mg) for prevention of post-ERCP pancreatitis (PEP), especially in high-risk groups. A total of 608 patients who underwent ERCP were included; 13 patients were excluded. Patients were divided into 3 groups: controls (group A), infusion with 20 mg of nafamostat mesilate (group B), or infusion with 50 mg of nafamostat mesilate (group C). The incidence of PEP was analyzed. The overall incidence of acute pancreatitis was 7.4% (44/595). There was a significant difference in the incidence of PEP with or without nafamostat mesilate (13.0% vs 4.0% and 5.1%, respectively; P &lt; 0.0001). Subgroup analysis showed that in low-risk patients, the rate of PEP was significantly different with nafamostat (11.9% vs 2.7% and 4.0%, respectively; P = 0.007). In high-risk patients, the rate of PEP was not significantly different among treatment groups (14.6% vs 5.9% vs 6.9%, respectively; P = 0.108). Nafamostat mesilate prophylaxis (20 or 50 mg) is effective in preventing post-ERCP pancreatitis. However, the preventive effect of high-dose nafamostat mesilate (50 mg) is not significant in high-risk patients.</description><subject>Acute Disease</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Amylases - blood</subject><subject>Cholangiopancreatography, Endoscopic Retrograde - adverse effects</subject><subject>Dose-Response Relationship, Drug</subject><subject>Drug Administration Schedule</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Guanidines - administration &amp; dosage</subject><subject>Guanidines - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Infusions, Intravenous</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Pancreatitis - blood</subject><subject>Pancreatitis - etiology</subject><subject>Pancreatitis - prevention &amp; control</subject><subject>Prospective Studies</subject><subject>Protease Inhibitors - administration &amp; dosage</subject><subject>Protease Inhibitors - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Risk Factors</subject><subject>Time Factors</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><issn>0885-3177</issn><issn>1536-4828</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2011</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpdkEtLAzEUhYMotlb_gUh2bpyaTCaTzEpK8VFQLKLrIZPc2Oi8TFKh_npHWl24unD5zjnwIXRKyZSSQlw-LGdTUhHKgFGZppTmhu-hMeUsTzKZyn00JlLyhFEhRugohDdCqGC8OESjdPjxgsox-loEvHKvq8R0AXCrrGq6EFXEDQRXqwgYrAUd3Sdg23kcV4B7D5_QRte1uLO4H_jk-mm-xL1qtQcVXXThAkPoQTtV1xvs2u2Gd-F9oKIb0uHqGB1YVQc42d0Jerm5fp7fJfePt4v57D7RTKQxUcZSAVzkFUsrENTkAjKjKgOaZXmudZXngioDKjMWKHDJualSVmmueSEzNkHn297edx9rCLFsXNBQ16qFbh1KWUiZEZnygcy2pPZdCB5s2XvXKL8pKSl_pJeD9PK_9CF2thtYVw2Yv9CvZfYN1O6BEg</recordid><startdate>201111</startdate><enddate>201111</enddate><creator>Park, Kee Tae</creator><creator>Kang, Dae Hwan</creator><creator>Choi, Cheol Woong</creator><creator>Cho, Mong</creator><creator>Park, Su Bum</creator><creator>Kim, Hyung Wook</creator><creator>Kim, Dong Uk</creator><creator>Chung, Chung Wook</creator><creator>Yoon, Ki Tae</creator><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201111</creationdate><title>Is high-dose nafamostat mesilate effective for the prevention of post-ERCP pancreatitis, especially in high-risk patients?</title><author>Park, Kee Tae ; Kang, Dae Hwan ; Choi, Cheol Woong ; Cho, Mong ; Park, Su Bum ; Kim, Hyung Wook ; Kim, Dong Uk ; Chung, Chung Wook ; Yoon, Ki Tae</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c372t-adf17e576b32be71d67e4dabdec3466ccb6671adea4dfe1e5855db23bc5c59843</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2011</creationdate><topic>Acute Disease</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Amylases - blood</topic><topic>Cholangiopancreatography, Endoscopic Retrograde - adverse effects</topic><topic>Dose-Response Relationship, Drug</topic><topic>Drug Administration Schedule</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Guanidines - administration &amp; dosage</topic><topic>Guanidines - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Infusions, Intravenous</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Pancreatitis - blood</topic><topic>Pancreatitis - etiology</topic><topic>Pancreatitis - prevention &amp; control</topic><topic>Prospective Studies</topic><topic>Protease Inhibitors - administration &amp; dosage</topic><topic>Protease Inhibitors - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Risk Factors</topic><topic>Time Factors</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Park, Kee Tae</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kang, Dae Hwan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Choi, Cheol Woong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cho, Mong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Park, Su Bum</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Hyung Wook</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Dong Uk</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chung, Chung Wook</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yoon, Ki Tae</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Pancreas</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Park, Kee Tae</au><au>Kang, Dae Hwan</au><au>Choi, Cheol Woong</au><au>Cho, Mong</au><au>Park, Su Bum</au><au>Kim, Hyung Wook</au><au>Kim, Dong Uk</au><au>Chung, Chung Wook</au><au>Yoon, Ki Tae</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Is high-dose nafamostat mesilate effective for the prevention of post-ERCP pancreatitis, especially in high-risk patients?</atitle><jtitle>Pancreas</jtitle><addtitle>Pancreas</addtitle><date>2011-11</date><risdate>2011</risdate><volume>40</volume><issue>8</issue><spage>1215</spage><epage>1219</epage><pages>1215-1219</pages><issn>0885-3177</issn><eissn>1536-4828</eissn><abstract>Infusion of the protease inhibitor nafamostat mesilate (20 mg) effectively prevents post-ERCP pancreatitis, but only in low-risk groups. This study was performed to evaluate the use of high-dose nafamostat mesilate (50 mg) for prevention of post-ERCP pancreatitis (PEP), especially in high-risk groups. A total of 608 patients who underwent ERCP were included; 13 patients were excluded. Patients were divided into 3 groups: controls (group A), infusion with 20 mg of nafamostat mesilate (group B), or infusion with 50 mg of nafamostat mesilate (group C). The incidence of PEP was analyzed. The overall incidence of acute pancreatitis was 7.4% (44/595). There was a significant difference in the incidence of PEP with or without nafamostat mesilate (13.0% vs 4.0% and 5.1%, respectively; P &lt; 0.0001). Subgroup analysis showed that in low-risk patients, the rate of PEP was significantly different with nafamostat (11.9% vs 2.7% and 4.0%, respectively; P = 0.007). In high-risk patients, the rate of PEP was not significantly different among treatment groups (14.6% vs 5.9% vs 6.9%, respectively; P = 0.108). Nafamostat mesilate prophylaxis (20 or 50 mg) is effective in preventing post-ERCP pancreatitis. However, the preventive effect of high-dose nafamostat mesilate (50 mg) is not significant in high-risk patients.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pmid>21775918</pmid><doi>10.1097/MPA.0b013e31822116d5</doi><tpages>5</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0885-3177
ispartof Pancreas, 2011-11, Vol.40 (8), p.1215-1219
issn 0885-3177
1536-4828
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_898840825
source MEDLINE; Journals@Ovid Complete
subjects Acute Disease
Aged
Amylases - blood
Cholangiopancreatography, Endoscopic Retrograde - adverse effects
Dose-Response Relationship, Drug
Drug Administration Schedule
Female
Guanidines - administration & dosage
Guanidines - therapeutic use
Humans
Infusions, Intravenous
Male
Middle Aged
Pancreatitis - blood
Pancreatitis - etiology
Pancreatitis - prevention & control
Prospective Studies
Protease Inhibitors - administration & dosage
Protease Inhibitors - therapeutic use
Risk Factors
Time Factors
Treatment Outcome
title Is high-dose nafamostat mesilate effective for the prevention of post-ERCP pancreatitis, especially in high-risk patients?
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-09T19%3A12%3A05IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Is%20high-dose%20nafamostat%20mesilate%20effective%20for%20the%20prevention%20of%20post-ERCP%20pancreatitis,%20especially%20in%20high-risk%20patients?&rft.jtitle=Pancreas&rft.au=Park,%20Kee%20Tae&rft.date=2011-11&rft.volume=40&rft.issue=8&rft.spage=1215&rft.epage=1219&rft.pages=1215-1219&rft.issn=0885-3177&rft.eissn=1536-4828&rft_id=info:doi/10.1097/MPA.0b013e31822116d5&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E898840825%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=898840825&rft_id=info:pmid/21775918&rfr_iscdi=true