Catheter Fracture of Intravenous Ports and its Management

Background Intravenous ports are widely used for oncology patients. However, catheter fractures may lead to the need for re-intervention. We aimed to identify the risk factors associated with catheter fractures. Methods Between January 1 and December 31, 2006, we retrospectively reviewed the clinica...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:World journal of surgery 2011-11, Vol.35 (11), p.2403-2410
Hauptverfasser: Wu, Ching-Yang, Fu, Jui-Ying, Feng, Po-Hao, Kao, Tsung-Chi, Yu, Sheng-Yueh, Li, Hao-Jui, Ko, Po-Jen, Hsieh, Hung-Chang
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 2410
container_issue 11
container_start_page 2403
container_title World journal of surgery
container_volume 35
creator Wu, Ching-Yang
Fu, Jui-Ying
Feng, Po-Hao
Kao, Tsung-Chi
Yu, Sheng-Yueh
Li, Hao-Jui
Ko, Po-Jen
Hsieh, Hung-Chang
description Background Intravenous ports are widely used for oncology patients. However, catheter fractures may lead to the need for re-intervention. We aimed to identify the risk factors associated with catheter fractures. Methods Between January 1 and December 31, 2006, we retrospectively reviewed the clinical data and plain chest films of 1,505 patients implanted with an intravenous port at Chang Gung Memorial Hospital. Different vascular sites were compared using the chi-square or Fisher’s exact test for categorical variables, and the t test was used for continuous variables with normal distribution; P   <  0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results There were 59 and 1,448 procedures in the fracture and non-fracture groups, respectively. Monovariate analysis revealed that the risk factors for catheter fracture were as follows: large angle ( P  
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s00268-011-1200-x
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_898174005</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>898174005</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5168-e961173bb46e666a0adbdb949a5e4cb014ce42c1569ad148113f1817059745ee3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkMFu1DAQhi1URJeFB-CCokpVT4EZ23HiY7tiadEikABxtBxn0qbKOq2d0PbtcZWllZCqnsaH7x__8zH2DuEDApQfIwBXVQ6IOXKA_PYFW6AUPOeCiz22AKFkeqPYZ69jvATAUoF6xfY5VhUHIRZMr-x4QSOFbB2sG6dA2dBmZ34M9g_5YYrZ9yGMMbO-ybo0v1pvz2lLfnzDXra2j_R2N5fs1_rTz9Vpvvn2-Wx1vMldgakcaYVYirqWipRSFmxTN7WW2hYkXQ0oHUnusFDaNigrRNFihSUUupQFkViyo3nvVRiuJ4qj2XbRUd9bT6mfqXSiJUCRyIP_yMthCj6VS1AptKxKkSCcIReGGAO15ip0WxvuDIK5t2pmqyZZNfdWzW3KvN8tnuotNQ-JfxoTcLgDbHS2b4P1rouPXCFKxblMnJ65m66nu-d_Nr-__DhZQ6F4lbJ8zsYU8-cUHq97uvlf-hmeKA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>897394873</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Catheter Fracture of Intravenous Ports and its Management</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library All Journals</source><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Wu, Ching-Yang ; Fu, Jui-Ying ; Feng, Po-Hao ; Kao, Tsung-Chi ; Yu, Sheng-Yueh ; Li, Hao-Jui ; Ko, Po-Jen ; Hsieh, Hung-Chang</creator><creatorcontrib>Wu, Ching-Yang ; Fu, Jui-Ying ; Feng, Po-Hao ; Kao, Tsung-Chi ; Yu, Sheng-Yueh ; Li, Hao-Jui ; Ko, Po-Jen ; Hsieh, Hung-Chang</creatorcontrib><description>Background Intravenous ports are widely used for oncology patients. However, catheter fractures may lead to the need for re-intervention. We aimed to identify the risk factors associated with catheter fractures. Methods Between January 1 and December 31, 2006, we retrospectively reviewed the clinical data and plain chest films of 1,505 patients implanted with an intravenous port at Chang Gung Memorial Hospital. Different vascular sites were compared using the chi-square or Fisher’s exact test for categorical variables, and the t test was used for continuous variables with normal distribution; P   &lt;  0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results There were 59 and 1,448 procedures in the fracture and non-fracture groups, respectively. Monovariate analysis revealed that the risk factors for catheter fracture were as follows: large angle ( P  &lt; 0.0001), female gender ( P  &lt; 0.0008), subclavian route ( P  &lt; 0.0001), and port type Arrow French (Fr.) 8.1 ( P  &lt; 0.0001). Because these risk factors showed no interaction effects, they were all considered independent risk factors. When all factors were considered together, all risk factors, except angle and age, retained their statistical significance. Conclusions Most catheter fractures were caused by material weakness. If catheter fracture is confirmed, further intervention for port and catheter removal is recommended. Female gender, intravenous port implantation via the subclavian route, and the Arrow Fr. 8.1 port were found to be risk factors. Patients with these risk factors should be monitored closely to avoid catheter fractures.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0364-2313</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1432-2323</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s00268-011-1200-x</identifier><identifier>PMID: 21882033</identifier><identifier>CODEN: WJSUDI</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: Springer-Verlag</publisher><subject>Abdominal Surgery ; Aged ; Biological and medical sciences ; Cardiac Surgery ; Catheter ; Catheter Removal ; Catheterization, Central Venous - instrumentation ; Catheterization, Central Venous - methods ; Catheters, Indwelling - adverse effects ; Cephalic Vein ; Equipment Failure - statistics &amp; numerical data ; Female ; General aspects ; General Surgery ; Humans ; Logistic Models ; Male ; Medical sciences ; Medicine ; Medicine &amp; Public Health ; Middle Aged ; Retrospective Studies ; Right Atrium ; Risk Factors ; Sex Factors ; Superior Vena Cava ; Surgery ; Thoracic Surgery ; Vascular Surgery</subject><ispartof>World journal of surgery, 2011-11, Vol.35 (11), p.2403-2410</ispartof><rights>Société Internationale de Chirurgie 2011</rights><rights>2011 The Author(s) under exclusive licence to Société Internationale de Chirurgie</rights><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5168-e961173bb46e666a0adbdb949a5e4cb014ce42c1569ad148113f1817059745ee3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5168-e961173bb46e666a0adbdb949a5e4cb014ce42c1569ad148113f1817059745ee3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s00268-011-1200-x$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00268-011-1200-x$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1416,27923,27924,41487,42556,45573,45574,51318</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=25376224$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21882033$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Wu, Ching-Yang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fu, Jui-Ying</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Feng, Po-Hao</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kao, Tsung-Chi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yu, Sheng-Yueh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Hao-Jui</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ko, Po-Jen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hsieh, Hung-Chang</creatorcontrib><title>Catheter Fracture of Intravenous Ports and its Management</title><title>World journal of surgery</title><addtitle>World J Surg</addtitle><addtitle>World J Surg</addtitle><description>Background Intravenous ports are widely used for oncology patients. However, catheter fractures may lead to the need for re-intervention. We aimed to identify the risk factors associated with catheter fractures. Methods Between January 1 and December 31, 2006, we retrospectively reviewed the clinical data and plain chest films of 1,505 patients implanted with an intravenous port at Chang Gung Memorial Hospital. Different vascular sites were compared using the chi-square or Fisher’s exact test for categorical variables, and the t test was used for continuous variables with normal distribution; P   &lt;  0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results There were 59 and 1,448 procedures in the fracture and non-fracture groups, respectively. Monovariate analysis revealed that the risk factors for catheter fracture were as follows: large angle ( P  &lt; 0.0001), female gender ( P  &lt; 0.0008), subclavian route ( P  &lt; 0.0001), and port type Arrow French (Fr.) 8.1 ( P  &lt; 0.0001). Because these risk factors showed no interaction effects, they were all considered independent risk factors. When all factors were considered together, all risk factors, except angle and age, retained their statistical significance. Conclusions Most catheter fractures were caused by material weakness. If catheter fracture is confirmed, further intervention for port and catheter removal is recommended. Female gender, intravenous port implantation via the subclavian route, and the Arrow Fr. 8.1 port were found to be risk factors. Patients with these risk factors should be monitored closely to avoid catheter fractures.</description><subject>Abdominal Surgery</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Cardiac Surgery</subject><subject>Catheter</subject><subject>Catheter Removal</subject><subject>Catheterization, Central Venous - instrumentation</subject><subject>Catheterization, Central Venous - methods</subject><subject>Catheters, Indwelling - adverse effects</subject><subject>Cephalic Vein</subject><subject>Equipment Failure - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>General aspects</subject><subject>General Surgery</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Logistic Models</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine &amp; Public Health</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Right Atrium</subject><subject>Risk Factors</subject><subject>Sex Factors</subject><subject>Superior Vena Cava</subject><subject>Surgery</subject><subject>Thoracic Surgery</subject><subject>Vascular Surgery</subject><issn>0364-2313</issn><issn>1432-2323</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2011</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkMFu1DAQhi1URJeFB-CCokpVT4EZ23HiY7tiadEikABxtBxn0qbKOq2d0PbtcZWllZCqnsaH7x__8zH2DuEDApQfIwBXVQ6IOXKA_PYFW6AUPOeCiz22AKFkeqPYZ69jvATAUoF6xfY5VhUHIRZMr-x4QSOFbB2sG6dA2dBmZ34M9g_5YYrZ9yGMMbO-ybo0v1pvz2lLfnzDXra2j_R2N5fs1_rTz9Vpvvn2-Wx1vMldgakcaYVYirqWipRSFmxTN7WW2hYkXQ0oHUnusFDaNigrRNFihSUUupQFkViyo3nvVRiuJ4qj2XbRUd9bT6mfqXSiJUCRyIP_yMthCj6VS1AptKxKkSCcIReGGAO15ip0WxvuDIK5t2pmqyZZNfdWzW3KvN8tnuotNQ-JfxoTcLgDbHS2b4P1rouPXCFKxblMnJ65m66nu-d_Nr-__DhZQ6F4lbJ8zsYU8-cUHq97uvlf-hmeKA</recordid><startdate>201111</startdate><enddate>201111</enddate><creator>Wu, Ching-Yang</creator><creator>Fu, Jui-Ying</creator><creator>Feng, Po-Hao</creator><creator>Kao, Tsung-Chi</creator><creator>Yu, Sheng-Yueh</creator><creator>Li, Hao-Jui</creator><creator>Ko, Po-Jen</creator><creator>Hsieh, Hung-Chang</creator><general>Springer-Verlag</general><general>Springer‐Verlag</general><general>Springer</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201111</creationdate><title>Catheter Fracture of Intravenous Ports and its Management</title><author>Wu, Ching-Yang ; Fu, Jui-Ying ; Feng, Po-Hao ; Kao, Tsung-Chi ; Yu, Sheng-Yueh ; Li, Hao-Jui ; Ko, Po-Jen ; Hsieh, Hung-Chang</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5168-e961173bb46e666a0adbdb949a5e4cb014ce42c1569ad148113f1817059745ee3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2011</creationdate><topic>Abdominal Surgery</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Cardiac Surgery</topic><topic>Catheter</topic><topic>Catheter Removal</topic><topic>Catheterization, Central Venous - instrumentation</topic><topic>Catheterization, Central Venous - methods</topic><topic>Catheters, Indwelling - adverse effects</topic><topic>Cephalic Vein</topic><topic>Equipment Failure - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>General aspects</topic><topic>General Surgery</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Logistic Models</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine &amp; Public Health</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Right Atrium</topic><topic>Risk Factors</topic><topic>Sex Factors</topic><topic>Superior Vena Cava</topic><topic>Surgery</topic><topic>Thoracic Surgery</topic><topic>Vascular Surgery</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Wu, Ching-Yang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fu, Jui-Ying</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Feng, Po-Hao</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kao, Tsung-Chi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yu, Sheng-Yueh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Hao-Jui</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ko, Po-Jen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hsieh, Hung-Chang</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>World journal of surgery</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Wu, Ching-Yang</au><au>Fu, Jui-Ying</au><au>Feng, Po-Hao</au><au>Kao, Tsung-Chi</au><au>Yu, Sheng-Yueh</au><au>Li, Hao-Jui</au><au>Ko, Po-Jen</au><au>Hsieh, Hung-Chang</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Catheter Fracture of Intravenous Ports and its Management</atitle><jtitle>World journal of surgery</jtitle><stitle>World J Surg</stitle><addtitle>World J Surg</addtitle><date>2011-11</date><risdate>2011</risdate><volume>35</volume><issue>11</issue><spage>2403</spage><epage>2410</epage><pages>2403-2410</pages><issn>0364-2313</issn><eissn>1432-2323</eissn><coden>WJSUDI</coden><abstract>Background Intravenous ports are widely used for oncology patients. However, catheter fractures may lead to the need for re-intervention. We aimed to identify the risk factors associated with catheter fractures. Methods Between January 1 and December 31, 2006, we retrospectively reviewed the clinical data and plain chest films of 1,505 patients implanted with an intravenous port at Chang Gung Memorial Hospital. Different vascular sites were compared using the chi-square or Fisher’s exact test for categorical variables, and the t test was used for continuous variables with normal distribution; P   &lt;  0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results There were 59 and 1,448 procedures in the fracture and non-fracture groups, respectively. Monovariate analysis revealed that the risk factors for catheter fracture were as follows: large angle ( P  &lt; 0.0001), female gender ( P  &lt; 0.0008), subclavian route ( P  &lt; 0.0001), and port type Arrow French (Fr.) 8.1 ( P  &lt; 0.0001). Because these risk factors showed no interaction effects, they were all considered independent risk factors. When all factors were considered together, all risk factors, except angle and age, retained their statistical significance. Conclusions Most catheter fractures were caused by material weakness. If catheter fracture is confirmed, further intervention for port and catheter removal is recommended. Female gender, intravenous port implantation via the subclavian route, and the Arrow Fr. 8.1 port were found to be risk factors. Patients with these risk factors should be monitored closely to avoid catheter fractures.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>Springer-Verlag</pub><pmid>21882033</pmid><doi>10.1007/s00268-011-1200-x</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0364-2313
ispartof World journal of surgery, 2011-11, Vol.35 (11), p.2403-2410
issn 0364-2313
1432-2323
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_898174005
source MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library All Journals; SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings
subjects Abdominal Surgery
Aged
Biological and medical sciences
Cardiac Surgery
Catheter
Catheter Removal
Catheterization, Central Venous - instrumentation
Catheterization, Central Venous - methods
Catheters, Indwelling - adverse effects
Cephalic Vein
Equipment Failure - statistics & numerical data
Female
General aspects
General Surgery
Humans
Logistic Models
Male
Medical sciences
Medicine
Medicine & Public Health
Middle Aged
Retrospective Studies
Right Atrium
Risk Factors
Sex Factors
Superior Vena Cava
Surgery
Thoracic Surgery
Vascular Surgery
title Catheter Fracture of Intravenous Ports and its Management
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-11T13%3A18%3A50IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Catheter%20Fracture%20of%20Intravenous%20Ports%20and%20its%20Management&rft.jtitle=World%20journal%20of%20surgery&rft.au=Wu,%20Ching-Yang&rft.date=2011-11&rft.volume=35&rft.issue=11&rft.spage=2403&rft.epage=2410&rft.pages=2403-2410&rft.issn=0364-2313&rft.eissn=1432-2323&rft.coden=WJSUDI&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s00268-011-1200-x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E898174005%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=897394873&rft_id=info:pmid/21882033&rfr_iscdi=true