Comparison of P19-derived neuroprogenitor and naive cell survival after intracerebellar application into B6CBA mice

Mouse embryonic carcinoma cells (P19 line) were studied for both their survival and developmental potential in the intact cerebellum of B6CBA mice. The P19 cells were cultured and labelled with green fluorescent protein using transfection. Cells were used for transplantation either in the undifferen...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Folia biologica 2011-01, Vol.57 (4), p.162-169
Hauptverfasser: Houdek, Z, Cendelín, J, Kulda, V, Babuška, V, Vožeh, F, Hatina, J, Králíčková, M, Zech, N H, Veselá, I, Pacherník, J, Uher, P
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 169
container_issue 4
container_start_page 162
container_title Folia biologica
container_volume 57
creator Houdek, Z
Cendelín, J
Kulda, V
Babuška, V
Vožeh, F
Hatina, J
Králíčková, M
Zech, N H
Veselá, I
Pacherník, J
Uher, P
description Mouse embryonic carcinoma cells (P19 line) were studied for both their survival and developmental potential in the intact cerebellum of B6CBA mice. The P19 cells were cultured and labelled with green fluorescent protein using transfection. Cells were used for transplantation either in the undifferentiated stage or after 3 days of neurodifferentiation induced by retinoic acid. The intracerebellar application was performed in 43 mice: group A (N = 21) received neuroprogenitors and group B (N = 22) received undifferentiated cells. The morphology of transplanted cells within the context of the surrounding cerebellar tissue was evaluated after 3 weeks. Naive P19 cells engrafted and survived in the cerebellum of 7 of the 22 adult mice (survival rate 31.8 %). Neuroprogenitors survived in 13 of the 21 mice (survival rate was 61.9 %). Since the cut-off is P < 0.05, the difference is not statistically significant (P = 0.069). An expansive appearance of the graft was significantly more frequent (P = 0.0047) in naive P19 cells than in neuroprogenitors. In mice in which the grafts did not survive, no marks of grafted cells or only fluorescing detritus were found. In conclusion, this is the first study to track the fate and morphology of embryonic carcinoma cells transplanted into the cerebellum, confirming that neuroprogenitors derived from embryonic carcinoma cells can settle in the host tissue and differentiate according to the surrounding conditions. With further validation, the embryonic carcinoma cells could become a valuable model with which to study the impact of cell therapy on neurodegenerative diseases.
doi_str_mv 10.14712/fb2011057040162
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_896830584</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>896830584</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c278t-a927667a866cec2f31fd60ae628dd2fec342bab99122206d3eebd281cf6c8dbd3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkU1P3DAQhi0E6i7b3nuqLC6cUsZ24jjH3VUplZDgAOfIscfIKImDnazEv68plMNeZqR5n3k1H4R8Z_CTlTXjV67jwBhUNZTAJD8ha14JUdQS-ClZA7CqqCqAFTlP6RlAlCDEF7LirKlVXak1SfswTDr6FEYaHL1nTWEx-gNaOuISwxTDE45-DpHqMdd0lqjBvqdpiQd_0D3VbsZI_ThHbTBil0Wd6WnqvdGzz8ZZC3Qn97stHbzBr-TM6T7ht4-8IY_Xvx72N8Xt3e8_--1tYXit5kI3vJay1kpKg4Y7wZyVoFFyZS13aETJO901DeOcg7QCsbNcMeOkUbazYkMu333zEi8LprkdfHqbXY8YltSqRioBlSozeXFEPocljnm4DJVKCMhhQ-AdMjGkFNG1U_SDjq8tg_bfO9qjd-SWHx--Szeg_Wz4f3_xF_8Yhpk</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>894833048</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparison of P19-derived neuroprogenitor and naive cell survival after intracerebellar application into B6CBA mice</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><creator>Houdek, Z ; Cendelín, J ; Kulda, V ; Babuška, V ; Vožeh, F ; Hatina, J ; Králíčková, M ; Zech, N H ; Veselá, I ; Pacherník, J ; Uher, P</creator><creatorcontrib>Houdek, Z ; Cendelín, J ; Kulda, V ; Babuška, V ; Vožeh, F ; Hatina, J ; Králíčková, M ; Zech, N H ; Veselá, I ; Pacherník, J ; Uher, P</creatorcontrib><description>Mouse embryonic carcinoma cells (P19 line) were studied for both their survival and developmental potential in the intact cerebellum of B6CBA mice. The P19 cells were cultured and labelled with green fluorescent protein using transfection. Cells were used for transplantation either in the undifferentiated stage or after 3 days of neurodifferentiation induced by retinoic acid. The intracerebellar application was performed in 43 mice: group A (N = 21) received neuroprogenitors and group B (N = 22) received undifferentiated cells. The morphology of transplanted cells within the context of the surrounding cerebellar tissue was evaluated after 3 weeks. Naive P19 cells engrafted and survived in the cerebellum of 7 of the 22 adult mice (survival rate 31.8 %). Neuroprogenitors survived in 13 of the 21 mice (survival rate was 61.9 %). Since the cut-off is P &lt; 0.05, the difference is not statistically significant (P = 0.069). An expansive appearance of the graft was significantly more frequent (P = 0.0047) in naive P19 cells than in neuroprogenitors. In mice in which the grafts did not survive, no marks of grafted cells or only fluorescing detritus were found. In conclusion, this is the first study to track the fate and morphology of embryonic carcinoma cells transplanted into the cerebellum, confirming that neuroprogenitors derived from embryonic carcinoma cells can settle in the host tissue and differentiate according to the surrounding conditions. With further validation, the embryonic carcinoma cells could become a valuable model with which to study the impact of cell therapy on neurodegenerative diseases.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0015-5500</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2533-7602</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.14712/fb2011057040162</identifier><identifier>PMID: 21978758</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Czech Republic: Charles University in Prague, First Faculty of Medicine</publisher><subject>Animals ; Blotting, Western ; Cell Differentiation - physiology ; Cell Line, Tumor ; Cell Survival - physiology ; Cell Transplantation ; Cerebellum - cytology ; Fluorescent Antibody Technique, Indirect ; Mice ; Neurons - cytology ; Reverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction ; Stem Cell Transplantation ; Stem Cells - cytology</subject><ispartof>Folia biologica, 2011-01, Vol.57 (4), p.162-169</ispartof><rights>Copyright Charles University in Prague, First Faculty of Medicine 2011</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c278t-a927667a866cec2f31fd60ae628dd2fec342bab99122206d3eebd281cf6c8dbd3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21978758$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Houdek, Z</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cendelín, J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kulda, V</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Babuška, V</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vožeh, F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hatina, J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Králíčková, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zech, N H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Veselá, I</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pacherník, J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Uher, P</creatorcontrib><title>Comparison of P19-derived neuroprogenitor and naive cell survival after intracerebellar application into B6CBA mice</title><title>Folia biologica</title><addtitle>Folia Biol (Praha)</addtitle><description>Mouse embryonic carcinoma cells (P19 line) were studied for both their survival and developmental potential in the intact cerebellum of B6CBA mice. The P19 cells were cultured and labelled with green fluorescent protein using transfection. Cells were used for transplantation either in the undifferentiated stage or after 3 days of neurodifferentiation induced by retinoic acid. The intracerebellar application was performed in 43 mice: group A (N = 21) received neuroprogenitors and group B (N = 22) received undifferentiated cells. The morphology of transplanted cells within the context of the surrounding cerebellar tissue was evaluated after 3 weeks. Naive P19 cells engrafted and survived in the cerebellum of 7 of the 22 adult mice (survival rate 31.8 %). Neuroprogenitors survived in 13 of the 21 mice (survival rate was 61.9 %). Since the cut-off is P &lt; 0.05, the difference is not statistically significant (P = 0.069). An expansive appearance of the graft was significantly more frequent (P = 0.0047) in naive P19 cells than in neuroprogenitors. In mice in which the grafts did not survive, no marks of grafted cells or only fluorescing detritus were found. In conclusion, this is the first study to track the fate and morphology of embryonic carcinoma cells transplanted into the cerebellum, confirming that neuroprogenitors derived from embryonic carcinoma cells can settle in the host tissue and differentiate according to the surrounding conditions. With further validation, the embryonic carcinoma cells could become a valuable model with which to study the impact of cell therapy on neurodegenerative diseases.</description><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Blotting, Western</subject><subject>Cell Differentiation - physiology</subject><subject>Cell Line, Tumor</subject><subject>Cell Survival - physiology</subject><subject>Cell Transplantation</subject><subject>Cerebellum - cytology</subject><subject>Fluorescent Antibody Technique, Indirect</subject><subject>Mice</subject><subject>Neurons - cytology</subject><subject>Reverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction</subject><subject>Stem Cell Transplantation</subject><subject>Stem Cells - cytology</subject><issn>0015-5500</issn><issn>2533-7602</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2011</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNpdkU1P3DAQhi0E6i7b3nuqLC6cUsZ24jjH3VUplZDgAOfIscfIKImDnazEv68plMNeZqR5n3k1H4R8Z_CTlTXjV67jwBhUNZTAJD8ha14JUdQS-ClZA7CqqCqAFTlP6RlAlCDEF7LirKlVXak1SfswTDr6FEYaHL1nTWEx-gNaOuISwxTDE45-DpHqMdd0lqjBvqdpiQd_0D3VbsZI_ThHbTBil0Wd6WnqvdGzz8ZZC3Qn97stHbzBr-TM6T7ht4-8IY_Xvx72N8Xt3e8_--1tYXit5kI3vJay1kpKg4Y7wZyVoFFyZS13aETJO901DeOcg7QCsbNcMeOkUbazYkMu333zEi8LprkdfHqbXY8YltSqRioBlSozeXFEPocljnm4DJVKCMhhQ-AdMjGkFNG1U_SDjq8tg_bfO9qjd-SWHx--Szeg_Wz4f3_xF_8Yhpk</recordid><startdate>20110101</startdate><enddate>20110101</enddate><creator>Houdek, Z</creator><creator>Cendelín, J</creator><creator>Kulda, V</creator><creator>Babuška, V</creator><creator>Vožeh, F</creator><creator>Hatina, J</creator><creator>Králíčková, M</creator><creator>Zech, N H</creator><creator>Veselá, I</creator><creator>Pacherník, J</creator><creator>Uher, P</creator><general>Charles University in Prague, First Faculty of Medicine</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>4T-</scope><scope>4U-</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88A</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BYOGL</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20110101</creationdate><title>Comparison of P19-derived neuroprogenitor and naive cell survival after intracerebellar application into B6CBA mice</title><author>Houdek, Z ; Cendelín, J ; Kulda, V ; Babuška, V ; Vožeh, F ; Hatina, J ; Králíčková, M ; Zech, N H ; Veselá, I ; Pacherník, J ; Uher, P</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c278t-a927667a866cec2f31fd60ae628dd2fec342bab99122206d3eebd281cf6c8dbd3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2011</creationdate><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Blotting, Western</topic><topic>Cell Differentiation - physiology</topic><topic>Cell Line, Tumor</topic><topic>Cell Survival - physiology</topic><topic>Cell Transplantation</topic><topic>Cerebellum - cytology</topic><topic>Fluorescent Antibody Technique, Indirect</topic><topic>Mice</topic><topic>Neurons - cytology</topic><topic>Reverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction</topic><topic>Stem Cell Transplantation</topic><topic>Stem Cells - cytology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Houdek, Z</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cendelín, J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kulda, V</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Babuška, V</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vožeh, F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hatina, J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Králíčková, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zech, N H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Veselá, I</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pacherník, J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Uher, P</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Docstoc</collection><collection>University Readers</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Biology Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>East Europe, Central Europe Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Folia biologica</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Houdek, Z</au><au>Cendelín, J</au><au>Kulda, V</au><au>Babuška, V</au><au>Vožeh, F</au><au>Hatina, J</au><au>Králíčková, M</au><au>Zech, N H</au><au>Veselá, I</au><au>Pacherník, J</au><au>Uher, P</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparison of P19-derived neuroprogenitor and naive cell survival after intracerebellar application into B6CBA mice</atitle><jtitle>Folia biologica</jtitle><addtitle>Folia Biol (Praha)</addtitle><date>2011-01-01</date><risdate>2011</risdate><volume>57</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>162</spage><epage>169</epage><pages>162-169</pages><issn>0015-5500</issn><eissn>2533-7602</eissn><abstract>Mouse embryonic carcinoma cells (P19 line) were studied for both their survival and developmental potential in the intact cerebellum of B6CBA mice. The P19 cells were cultured and labelled with green fluorescent protein using transfection. Cells were used for transplantation either in the undifferentiated stage or after 3 days of neurodifferentiation induced by retinoic acid. The intracerebellar application was performed in 43 mice: group A (N = 21) received neuroprogenitors and group B (N = 22) received undifferentiated cells. The morphology of transplanted cells within the context of the surrounding cerebellar tissue was evaluated after 3 weeks. Naive P19 cells engrafted and survived in the cerebellum of 7 of the 22 adult mice (survival rate 31.8 %). Neuroprogenitors survived in 13 of the 21 mice (survival rate was 61.9 %). Since the cut-off is P &lt; 0.05, the difference is not statistically significant (P = 0.069). An expansive appearance of the graft was significantly more frequent (P = 0.0047) in naive P19 cells than in neuroprogenitors. In mice in which the grafts did not survive, no marks of grafted cells or only fluorescing detritus were found. In conclusion, this is the first study to track the fate and morphology of embryonic carcinoma cells transplanted into the cerebellum, confirming that neuroprogenitors derived from embryonic carcinoma cells can settle in the host tissue and differentiate according to the surrounding conditions. With further validation, the embryonic carcinoma cells could become a valuable model with which to study the impact of cell therapy on neurodegenerative diseases.</abstract><cop>Czech Republic</cop><pub>Charles University in Prague, First Faculty of Medicine</pub><pmid>21978758</pmid><doi>10.14712/fb2011057040162</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0015-5500
ispartof Folia biologica, 2011-01, Vol.57 (4), p.162-169
issn 0015-5500
2533-7602
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_896830584
source MEDLINE; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals
subjects Animals
Blotting, Western
Cell Differentiation - physiology
Cell Line, Tumor
Cell Survival - physiology
Cell Transplantation
Cerebellum - cytology
Fluorescent Antibody Technique, Indirect
Mice
Neurons - cytology
Reverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction
Stem Cell Transplantation
Stem Cells - cytology
title Comparison of P19-derived neuroprogenitor and naive cell survival after intracerebellar application into B6CBA mice
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-31T19%3A39%3A39IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparison%20of%20P19-derived%20neuroprogenitor%20and%20naive%20cell%20survival%20after%20intracerebellar%20application%20into%20B6CBA%20mice&rft.jtitle=Folia%20biologica&rft.au=Houdek,%20Z&rft.date=2011-01-01&rft.volume=57&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=162&rft.epage=169&rft.pages=162-169&rft.issn=0015-5500&rft.eissn=2533-7602&rft_id=info:doi/10.14712/fb2011057040162&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E896830584%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=894833048&rft_id=info:pmid/21978758&rfr_iscdi=true