Bacterial and fungal colonisation of peripheral intravenous catheters in dogs and cats
Objectives: The purposes of this study were to determine the prevalence of intravenous catheter colonisation in a routine clinical setting, to identify pathogens involved and to explore factors associated with an increased risk of colonisation. Methods: A prospective study of 100 peripherally placed...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of small animal practice 2011-10, Vol.52 (10), p.531-535 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 535 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 10 |
| container_start_page | 531 |
| container_title | Journal of small animal practice |
| container_volume | 52 |
| creator | Seguela, J. Pages, J.-P. |
| description | Objectives: The purposes of this study were to determine the prevalence of intravenous catheter colonisation in a routine clinical setting, to identify pathogens involved and to explore factors associated with an increased risk of colonisation.
Methods: A prospective study of 100 peripherally placed intravenous catheters from 13 cats and 78 dogs was conducted. The distal two‐thirds were removed and submitted for bacterial and fungal cultures. Antimicrobial susceptibility of each isolate was determined.
Results: Nineteen peripheral catheters were positive for microbiologic culture from 14 animals. Twenty organisms were isolated among which Staphylococcus species was the most common. Isolates displayed lower levels of resistance against the antimicrobial agents amoxicillin‐clavulanate, cephalosporins and gentamicin than against other agents tested. Major risk factors predisposing to catheter‐related colonisation included dextrose infusion, duration of catheter placement, local complications and immunosuppressive diseases or drugs.
Clinical Significance: In a routine clinical setting, the prevalence of microbial colonisation of peripheral intravenous catheters is comparable to that found in an intensive care unit. However, consequences on morbidity and mortality rates differ. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1111/j.1748-5827.2011.01101.x |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_896393969</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1020839292</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4401-be7950c492bd4b86d5d1d844aa6922da9792dd955591fb7585e64afbdad27dc3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkF9PwyAUxYnR6Jx-BdM3fWkFCgVeTNT4N4sat7hHQgvVzq6t0On89tJ17tFIQrjc-zsHcgAIEIyQX6ezCDHCQ8oxizBEKPIbomi5BQabwTYYQIhxSCiCe2DfuZm_JoTBXbCHEccEETEALxcqa40tVBmoSgf5onr1ZVaXdVU41RZ1FdR50HiieTPWj4qqterTVPXCBZlq34xXO98NdP3qVh6-6w7ATq5KZw7X5xBMrq8ml7fh6PHm7vJ8FGaEQBSmhgkKMyJwqknKE0010pwQpRKBsVaCCay1oJQKlKeMcmoSovJUK42ZzuIhOO5tG1t_LIxr5bxwmSlLVRn_QclFEotYJMKTJ3-SCGLIY4EF9ijv0czWzlmTy8YWc2W_PSS7-OVMdinLLmXZxS9X8cullx6tX1mkc6M3wt-8PXDWA19Fab7_bSzvx-dPXekNwt6gcK1ZbgyUfZcJixmV04cbOWHj6ZiMnuVt_ANKB6N0</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1020839292</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Bacterial and fungal colonisation of peripheral intravenous catheters in dogs and cats</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Seguela, J. ; Pages, J.-P.</creator><creatorcontrib>Seguela, J. ; Pages, J.-P.</creatorcontrib><description>Objectives: The purposes of this study were to determine the prevalence of intravenous catheter colonisation in a routine clinical setting, to identify pathogens involved and to explore factors associated with an increased risk of colonisation.
Methods: A prospective study of 100 peripherally placed intravenous catheters from 13 cats and 78 dogs was conducted. The distal two‐thirds were removed and submitted for bacterial and fungal cultures. Antimicrobial susceptibility of each isolate was determined.
Results: Nineteen peripheral catheters were positive for microbiologic culture from 14 animals. Twenty organisms were isolated among which Staphylococcus species was the most common. Isolates displayed lower levels of resistance against the antimicrobial agents amoxicillin‐clavulanate, cephalosporins and gentamicin than against other agents tested. Major risk factors predisposing to catheter‐related colonisation included dextrose infusion, duration of catheter placement, local complications and immunosuppressive diseases or drugs.
Clinical Significance: In a routine clinical setting, the prevalence of microbial colonisation of peripheral intravenous catheters is comparable to that found in an intensive care unit. However, consequences on morbidity and mortality rates differ.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-4510</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1748-5827</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/j.1748-5827.2011.01101.x</identifier><identifier>PMID: 21824149</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Animals ; Bacteria - growth & development ; Bacteria - isolation & purification ; Cat Diseases - epidemiology ; Cat Diseases - etiology ; Catheter-Related Infections - complications ; Catheter-Related Infections - epidemiology ; Catheter-Related Infections - veterinary ; Catheterization, Peripheral - adverse effects ; Catheterization, Peripheral - veterinary ; Catheters, Indwelling - adverse effects ; Catheters, Indwelling - microbiology ; Catheters, Indwelling - veterinary ; Cats ; Colony Count, Microbial ; Dog Diseases - epidemiology ; Dog Diseases - etiology ; Dogs ; Equipment Contamination ; Female ; Fungi - growth & development ; Fungi - isolation & purification ; Male ; Prevalence ; Risk Factors ; Staphylococcus</subject><ispartof>Journal of small animal practice, 2011-10, Vol.52 (10), p.531-535</ispartof><rights>2011 British Small Animal Veterinary Association</rights><rights>2011 British Small Animal Veterinary Association.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4401-be7950c492bd4b86d5d1d844aa6922da9792dd955591fb7585e64afbdad27dc3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4401-be7950c492bd4b86d5d1d844aa6922da9792dd955591fb7585e64afbdad27dc3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fj.1748-5827.2011.01101.x$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fj.1748-5827.2011.01101.x$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27901,27902,45550,45551</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21824149$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Seguela, J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pages, J.-P.</creatorcontrib><title>Bacterial and fungal colonisation of peripheral intravenous catheters in dogs and cats</title><title>Journal of small animal practice</title><addtitle>J Small Anim Pract</addtitle><description>Objectives: The purposes of this study were to determine the prevalence of intravenous catheter colonisation in a routine clinical setting, to identify pathogens involved and to explore factors associated with an increased risk of colonisation.
Methods: A prospective study of 100 peripherally placed intravenous catheters from 13 cats and 78 dogs was conducted. The distal two‐thirds were removed and submitted for bacterial and fungal cultures. Antimicrobial susceptibility of each isolate was determined.
Results: Nineteen peripheral catheters were positive for microbiologic culture from 14 animals. Twenty organisms were isolated among which Staphylococcus species was the most common. Isolates displayed lower levels of resistance against the antimicrobial agents amoxicillin‐clavulanate, cephalosporins and gentamicin than against other agents tested. Major risk factors predisposing to catheter‐related colonisation included dextrose infusion, duration of catheter placement, local complications and immunosuppressive diseases or drugs.
Clinical Significance: In a routine clinical setting, the prevalence of microbial colonisation of peripheral intravenous catheters is comparable to that found in an intensive care unit. However, consequences on morbidity and mortality rates differ.</description><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Bacteria - growth & development</subject><subject>Bacteria - isolation & purification</subject><subject>Cat Diseases - epidemiology</subject><subject>Cat Diseases - etiology</subject><subject>Catheter-Related Infections - complications</subject><subject>Catheter-Related Infections - epidemiology</subject><subject>Catheter-Related Infections - veterinary</subject><subject>Catheterization, Peripheral - adverse effects</subject><subject>Catheterization, Peripheral - veterinary</subject><subject>Catheters, Indwelling - adverse effects</subject><subject>Catheters, Indwelling - microbiology</subject><subject>Catheters, Indwelling - veterinary</subject><subject>Cats</subject><subject>Colony Count, Microbial</subject><subject>Dog Diseases - epidemiology</subject><subject>Dog Diseases - etiology</subject><subject>Dogs</subject><subject>Equipment Contamination</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Fungi - growth & development</subject><subject>Fungi - isolation & purification</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Prevalence</subject><subject>Risk Factors</subject><subject>Staphylococcus</subject><issn>0022-4510</issn><issn>1748-5827</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2011</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkF9PwyAUxYnR6Jx-BdM3fWkFCgVeTNT4N4sat7hHQgvVzq6t0On89tJ17tFIQrjc-zsHcgAIEIyQX6ezCDHCQ8oxizBEKPIbomi5BQabwTYYQIhxSCiCe2DfuZm_JoTBXbCHEccEETEALxcqa40tVBmoSgf5onr1ZVaXdVU41RZ1FdR50HiieTPWj4qqterTVPXCBZlq34xXO98NdP3qVh6-6w7ATq5KZw7X5xBMrq8ml7fh6PHm7vJ8FGaEQBSmhgkKMyJwqknKE0010pwQpRKBsVaCCay1oJQKlKeMcmoSovJUK42ZzuIhOO5tG1t_LIxr5bxwmSlLVRn_QclFEotYJMKTJ3-SCGLIY4EF9ijv0czWzlmTy8YWc2W_PSS7-OVMdinLLmXZxS9X8cullx6tX1mkc6M3wt-8PXDWA19Fab7_bSzvx-dPXekNwt6gcK1ZbgyUfZcJixmV04cbOWHj6ZiMnuVt_ANKB6N0</recordid><startdate>201110</startdate><enddate>201110</enddate><creator>Seguela, J.</creator><creator>Pages, J.-P.</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201110</creationdate><title>Bacterial and fungal colonisation of peripheral intravenous catheters in dogs and cats</title><author>Seguela, J. ; Pages, J.-P.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4401-be7950c492bd4b86d5d1d844aa6922da9792dd955591fb7585e64afbdad27dc3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2011</creationdate><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Bacteria - growth & development</topic><topic>Bacteria - isolation & purification</topic><topic>Cat Diseases - epidemiology</topic><topic>Cat Diseases - etiology</topic><topic>Catheter-Related Infections - complications</topic><topic>Catheter-Related Infections - epidemiology</topic><topic>Catheter-Related Infections - veterinary</topic><topic>Catheterization, Peripheral - adverse effects</topic><topic>Catheterization, Peripheral - veterinary</topic><topic>Catheters, Indwelling - adverse effects</topic><topic>Catheters, Indwelling - microbiology</topic><topic>Catheters, Indwelling - veterinary</topic><topic>Cats</topic><topic>Colony Count, Microbial</topic><topic>Dog Diseases - epidemiology</topic><topic>Dog Diseases - etiology</topic><topic>Dogs</topic><topic>Equipment Contamination</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Fungi - growth & development</topic><topic>Fungi - isolation & purification</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Prevalence</topic><topic>Risk Factors</topic><topic>Staphylococcus</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Seguela, J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pages, J.-P.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of small animal practice</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Seguela, J.</au><au>Pages, J.-P.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Bacterial and fungal colonisation of peripheral intravenous catheters in dogs and cats</atitle><jtitle>Journal of small animal practice</jtitle><addtitle>J Small Anim Pract</addtitle><date>2011-10</date><risdate>2011</risdate><volume>52</volume><issue>10</issue><spage>531</spage><epage>535</epage><pages>531-535</pages><issn>0022-4510</issn><eissn>1748-5827</eissn><abstract>Objectives: The purposes of this study were to determine the prevalence of intravenous catheter colonisation in a routine clinical setting, to identify pathogens involved and to explore factors associated with an increased risk of colonisation.
Methods: A prospective study of 100 peripherally placed intravenous catheters from 13 cats and 78 dogs was conducted. The distal two‐thirds were removed and submitted for bacterial and fungal cultures. Antimicrobial susceptibility of each isolate was determined.
Results: Nineteen peripheral catheters were positive for microbiologic culture from 14 animals. Twenty organisms were isolated among which Staphylococcus species was the most common. Isolates displayed lower levels of resistance against the antimicrobial agents amoxicillin‐clavulanate, cephalosporins and gentamicin than against other agents tested. Major risk factors predisposing to catheter‐related colonisation included dextrose infusion, duration of catheter placement, local complications and immunosuppressive diseases or drugs.
Clinical Significance: In a routine clinical setting, the prevalence of microbial colonisation of peripheral intravenous catheters is comparable to that found in an intensive care unit. However, consequences on morbidity and mortality rates differ.</abstract><cop>Oxford, UK</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><pmid>21824149</pmid><doi>10.1111/j.1748-5827.2011.01101.x</doi><tpages>5</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0022-4510 |
| ispartof | Journal of small animal practice, 2011-10, Vol.52 (10), p.531-535 |
| issn | 0022-4510 1748-5827 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_896393969 |
| source | MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete |
| subjects | Animals Bacteria - growth & development Bacteria - isolation & purification Cat Diseases - epidemiology Cat Diseases - etiology Catheter-Related Infections - complications Catheter-Related Infections - epidemiology Catheter-Related Infections - veterinary Catheterization, Peripheral - adverse effects Catheterization, Peripheral - veterinary Catheters, Indwelling - adverse effects Catheters, Indwelling - microbiology Catheters, Indwelling - veterinary Cats Colony Count, Microbial Dog Diseases - epidemiology Dog Diseases - etiology Dogs Equipment Contamination Female Fungi - growth & development Fungi - isolation & purification Male Prevalence Risk Factors Staphylococcus |
| title | Bacterial and fungal colonisation of peripheral intravenous catheters in dogs and cats |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-06T12%3A54%3A53IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Bacterial%20and%20fungal%20colonisation%20of%20peripheral%20intravenous%20catheters%20in%20dogs%20and%20cats&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20small%20animal%20practice&rft.au=Seguela,%20J.&rft.date=2011-10&rft.volume=52&rft.issue=10&rft.spage=531&rft.epage=535&rft.pages=531-535&rft.issn=0022-4510&rft.eissn=1748-5827&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/j.1748-5827.2011.01101.x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1020839292%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1020839292&rft_id=info:pmid/21824149&rfr_iscdi=true |