Fast morphological effects in first and second language word recognition
► We compare masked morphological priming in native and non-native word recognition. ► We find the same graded pattern of facilitation for transparent and opaque items. ► Morphological processing follows the same principles in L1 and L2. In three experiments we compared the performance of native Eng...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of memory and language 2011-05, Vol.64 (4), p.344-358 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 358 |
---|---|
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 344 |
container_title | Journal of memory and language |
container_volume | 64 |
creator | Diependaele, Kevin Duñabeitia, Jon Andoni Morris, Joanna Keuleers, Emmanuel |
description | ► We compare masked morphological priming in native and non-native word recognition. ► We find the same graded pattern of facilitation for transparent and opaque items. ► Morphological processing follows the same principles in L1 and L2.
In three experiments we compared the performance of native English speakers to that of Spanish–English and Dutch–English bilinguals on a masked morphological priming lexical decision task. The results do not show significant differences across the three experiments. In line with recent meta-analyses, we observed a graded pattern of facilitation across stem priming with transparent suffixed primes (e.g.,
viewer–
view), opaque suffixed or pseudo-suffixed primes (e.g.,
corner–
corn) and form control primes (e.g.,
freeze–
free). Priming was largest in the transparent condition, smallest in the form condition and intermediate in the opaque condition. Our data confirm the hypothesis that bilinguals largely adopt the same processing strategies as native speakers (e.g.,
Lemhöfer et al., 2008), and constrain the hypothesis that bilinguals rely more heavily on whole-word processing in their second language (
Clahsen, Felser, Neubauer, Sato, & Silva, 2010; Ullman, 2004, 2005). The observed pattern of morphological priming is in line with earlier monolingual studies, further highlighting the reality of semantic transparency effects in the initial stages of word recognition. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.jml.2011.01.003 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_896240006</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ericid>EJ920811</ericid><els_id>S0749596X11000040</els_id><sourcerecordid>896240006</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a539t-5d48c149decf5e0661be356c786c362ae07a33b5cb3a91a6d391f9ad360a912b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kEFrGzEQhUVpoa7bH1DIYQmUnNYdrVbaFTkFY9cthlwSyE3I2llHy3rlSOuU_PuMsfGhh8LAIL1vZh6Pse8cZhy4-tnNul0_K4DzGVCB-MAmHLTKoS74RzaBqtS51OrpM_uSUgcEyqqYsNXSpjHbhbh_Dn3Yemf7DNsW3ZgyP2StjyTbockSukCtt8P2YLeY_Q2xySJ9bgc_-jB8ZZ9a2yf8du5T9rhcPMxX-fr-1-_53Tq3Uugxl01ZO17qBl0rEZTiGxRSuapWTqjCIlRWiI10G2E1t6oRmrfaNkIBvYuNmLKb0959DC8HTKPZ-eSwJ2MYDsnUWhUlACgir_8hu3CIA5kztdSVKnnFCeInyMWQUsTW7KPf2fhmOJhjsqYzlKw5JmuACgTN_DgvtonyaqMdnE-XQTpfQy2PBq5OHEbvLvLijy6g5sfTt2eZ4nr1GE1yHgeHjadcR9ME_x8T7-lXlos</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>859764171</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Fast morphological effects in first and second language word recognition</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Diependaele, Kevin ; Duñabeitia, Jon Andoni ; Morris, Joanna ; Keuleers, Emmanuel</creator><creatorcontrib>Diependaele, Kevin ; Duñabeitia, Jon Andoni ; Morris, Joanna ; Keuleers, Emmanuel</creatorcontrib><description>► We compare masked morphological priming in native and non-native word recognition. ► We find the same graded pattern of facilitation for transparent and opaque items. ► Morphological processing follows the same principles in L1 and L2.
In three experiments we compared the performance of native English speakers to that of Spanish–English and Dutch–English bilinguals on a masked morphological priming lexical decision task. The results do not show significant differences across the three experiments. In line with recent meta-analyses, we observed a graded pattern of facilitation across stem priming with transparent suffixed primes (e.g.,
viewer–
view), opaque suffixed or pseudo-suffixed primes (e.g.,
corner–
corn) and form control primes (e.g.,
freeze–
free). Priming was largest in the transparent condition, smallest in the form condition and intermediate in the opaque condition. Our data confirm the hypothesis that bilinguals largely adopt the same processing strategies as native speakers (e.g.,
Lemhöfer et al., 2008), and constrain the hypothesis that bilinguals rely more heavily on whole-word processing in their second language (
Clahsen, Felser, Neubauer, Sato, & Silva, 2010; Ullman, 2004, 2005). The observed pattern of morphological priming is in line with earlier monolingual studies, further highlighting the reality of semantic transparency effects in the initial stages of word recognition.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0749-596X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1096-0821</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.jml.2011.01.003</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JMLAE6</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Amsterdam: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Bilingual word recognition ; Bilingualism ; Bilingualism. Multilingualism ; Biological and medical sciences ; Cognition & reasoning ; English ; English language ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Indo European Languages ; Language ; Language Processing ; Masked priming ; Meta Analysis ; Monolingualism ; Morphological processing ; Morphology (Languages) ; Native Speakers ; Priming ; Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry ; Psychology. Psychophysiology ; Second Languages ; Semantic transparency ; Semantics ; Spanish Speaking ; Word Processing ; Word Recognition</subject><ispartof>Journal of memory and language, 2011-05, Vol.64 (4), p.344-358</ispartof><rights>2011 Elsevier Inc.</rights><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright © 2011 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a539t-5d48c149decf5e0661be356c786c362ae07a33b5cb3a91a6d391f9ad360a912b3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a539t-5d48c149decf5e0661be356c786c362ae07a33b5cb3a91a6d391f9ad360a912b3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0749596X11000040$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ920811$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=24080856$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Diependaele, Kevin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Duñabeitia, Jon Andoni</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Morris, Joanna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Keuleers, Emmanuel</creatorcontrib><title>Fast morphological effects in first and second language word recognition</title><title>Journal of memory and language</title><description>► We compare masked morphological priming in native and non-native word recognition. ► We find the same graded pattern of facilitation for transparent and opaque items. ► Morphological processing follows the same principles in L1 and L2.
In three experiments we compared the performance of native English speakers to that of Spanish–English and Dutch–English bilinguals on a masked morphological priming lexical decision task. The results do not show significant differences across the three experiments. In line with recent meta-analyses, we observed a graded pattern of facilitation across stem priming with transparent suffixed primes (e.g.,
viewer–
view), opaque suffixed or pseudo-suffixed primes (e.g.,
corner–
corn) and form control primes (e.g.,
freeze–
free). Priming was largest in the transparent condition, smallest in the form condition and intermediate in the opaque condition. Our data confirm the hypothesis that bilinguals largely adopt the same processing strategies as native speakers (e.g.,
Lemhöfer et al., 2008), and constrain the hypothesis that bilinguals rely more heavily on whole-word processing in their second language (
Clahsen, Felser, Neubauer, Sato, & Silva, 2010; Ullman, 2004, 2005). The observed pattern of morphological priming is in line with earlier monolingual studies, further highlighting the reality of semantic transparency effects in the initial stages of word recognition.</description><subject>Bilingual word recognition</subject><subject>Bilingualism</subject><subject>Bilingualism. Multilingualism</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Cognition & reasoning</subject><subject>English</subject><subject>English language</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Indo European Languages</subject><subject>Language</subject><subject>Language Processing</subject><subject>Masked priming</subject><subject>Meta Analysis</subject><subject>Monolingualism</subject><subject>Morphological processing</subject><subject>Morphology (Languages)</subject><subject>Native Speakers</subject><subject>Priming</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychophysiology</subject><subject>Second Languages</subject><subject>Semantic transparency</subject><subject>Semantics</subject><subject>Spanish Speaking</subject><subject>Word Processing</subject><subject>Word Recognition</subject><issn>0749-596X</issn><issn>1096-0821</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2011</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kEFrGzEQhUVpoa7bH1DIYQmUnNYdrVbaFTkFY9cthlwSyE3I2llHy3rlSOuU_PuMsfGhh8LAIL1vZh6Pse8cZhy4-tnNul0_K4DzGVCB-MAmHLTKoS74RzaBqtS51OrpM_uSUgcEyqqYsNXSpjHbhbh_Dn3Yemf7DNsW3ZgyP2StjyTbockSukCtt8P2YLeY_Q2xySJ9bgc_-jB8ZZ9a2yf8du5T9rhcPMxX-fr-1-_53Tq3Uugxl01ZO17qBl0rEZTiGxRSuapWTqjCIlRWiI10G2E1t6oRmrfaNkIBvYuNmLKb0959DC8HTKPZ-eSwJ2MYDsnUWhUlACgir_8hu3CIA5kztdSVKnnFCeInyMWQUsTW7KPf2fhmOJhjsqYzlKw5JmuACgTN_DgvtonyaqMdnE-XQTpfQy2PBq5OHEbvLvLijy6g5sfTt2eZ4nr1GE1yHgeHjadcR9ME_x8T7-lXlos</recordid><startdate>20110501</startdate><enddate>20110501</enddate><creator>Diependaele, Kevin</creator><creator>Duñabeitia, Jon Andoni</creator><creator>Morris, Joanna</creator><creator>Keuleers, Emmanuel</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><general>Elsevier</general><general>Elsevier BV</general><scope>7SW</scope><scope>BJH</scope><scope>BNH</scope><scope>BNI</scope><scope>BNJ</scope><scope>BNO</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>PET</scope><scope>REK</scope><scope>WWN</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7T9</scope><scope>8BM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20110501</creationdate><title>Fast morphological effects in first and second language word recognition</title><author>Diependaele, Kevin ; Duñabeitia, Jon Andoni ; Morris, Joanna ; Keuleers, Emmanuel</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a539t-5d48c149decf5e0661be356c786c362ae07a33b5cb3a91a6d391f9ad360a912b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2011</creationdate><topic>Bilingual word recognition</topic><topic>Bilingualism</topic><topic>Bilingualism. Multilingualism</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Cognition & reasoning</topic><topic>English</topic><topic>English language</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Indo European Languages</topic><topic>Language</topic><topic>Language Processing</topic><topic>Masked priming</topic><topic>Meta Analysis</topic><topic>Monolingualism</topic><topic>Morphological processing</topic><topic>Morphology (Languages)</topic><topic>Native Speakers</topic><topic>Priming</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychophysiology</topic><topic>Second Languages</topic><topic>Semantic transparency</topic><topic>Semantics</topic><topic>Spanish Speaking</topic><topic>Word Processing</topic><topic>Word Recognition</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Diependaele, Kevin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Duñabeitia, Jon Andoni</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Morris, Joanna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Keuleers, Emmanuel</creatorcontrib><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Ovid)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>ERIC( SilverPlatter )</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC PlusText (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>Education Resources Information Center (ERIC)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Linguistics and Language Behavior Abstracts (LLBA)</collection><collection>ComDisDome</collection><jtitle>Journal of memory and language</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Diependaele, Kevin</au><au>Duñabeitia, Jon Andoni</au><au>Morris, Joanna</au><au>Keuleers, Emmanuel</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ920811</ericid><atitle>Fast morphological effects in first and second language word recognition</atitle><jtitle>Journal of memory and language</jtitle><date>2011-05-01</date><risdate>2011</risdate><volume>64</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>344</spage><epage>358</epage><pages>344-358</pages><issn>0749-596X</issn><eissn>1096-0821</eissn><coden>JMLAE6</coden><abstract>► We compare masked morphological priming in native and non-native word recognition. ► We find the same graded pattern of facilitation for transparent and opaque items. ► Morphological processing follows the same principles in L1 and L2.
In three experiments we compared the performance of native English speakers to that of Spanish–English and Dutch–English bilinguals on a masked morphological priming lexical decision task. The results do not show significant differences across the three experiments. In line with recent meta-analyses, we observed a graded pattern of facilitation across stem priming with transparent suffixed primes (e.g.,
viewer–
view), opaque suffixed or pseudo-suffixed primes (e.g.,
corner–
corn) and form control primes (e.g.,
freeze–
free). Priming was largest in the transparent condition, smallest in the form condition and intermediate in the opaque condition. Our data confirm the hypothesis that bilinguals largely adopt the same processing strategies as native speakers (e.g.,
Lemhöfer et al., 2008), and constrain the hypothesis that bilinguals rely more heavily on whole-word processing in their second language (
Clahsen, Felser, Neubauer, Sato, & Silva, 2010; Ullman, 2004, 2005). The observed pattern of morphological priming is in line with earlier monolingual studies, further highlighting the reality of semantic transparency effects in the initial stages of word recognition.</abstract><cop>Amsterdam</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><doi>10.1016/j.jml.2011.01.003</doi><tpages>15</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0749-596X |
ispartof | Journal of memory and language, 2011-05, Vol.64 (4), p.344-358 |
issn | 0749-596X 1096-0821 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_896240006 |
source | Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals |
subjects | Bilingual word recognition Bilingualism Bilingualism. Multilingualism Biological and medical sciences Cognition & reasoning English English language Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology Indo European Languages Language Language Processing Masked priming Meta Analysis Monolingualism Morphological processing Morphology (Languages) Native Speakers Priming Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry Psychology. Psychophysiology Second Languages Semantic transparency Semantics Spanish Speaking Word Processing Word Recognition |
title | Fast morphological effects in first and second language word recognition |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-04T10%3A32%3A15IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Fast%20morphological%20effects%20in%20first%20and%20second%20language%20word%20recognition&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20memory%20and%20language&rft.au=Diependaele,%20Kevin&rft.date=2011-05-01&rft.volume=64&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=344&rft.epage=358&rft.pages=344-358&rft.issn=0749-596X&rft.eissn=1096-0821&rft.coden=JMLAE6&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.jml.2011.01.003&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E896240006%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=859764171&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ericid=EJ920811&rft_els_id=S0749596X11000040&rfr_iscdi=true |