Reliable second-order hexahedral elements for explicit methods in nonlinear solid dynamics

Second‐order hexahedral elements are common in static and implicit dynamic finite element codes for nonlinear solid mechanics. Although probably not as popular as first‐order elements, they can perform better in many circumstances, particularly for modeling curved shapes and bending without artifici...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:International journal for numerical methods in engineering 2011-03, Vol.85 (9), p.1073-1102
Hauptverfasser: Danielson, Kent T., O'Daniel, James L.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1102
container_issue 9
container_start_page 1073
container_title International journal for numerical methods in engineering
container_volume 85
creator Danielson, Kent T.
O'Daniel, James L.
description Second‐order hexahedral elements are common in static and implicit dynamic finite element codes for nonlinear solid mechanics. Although probably not as popular as first‐order elements, they can perform better in many circumstances, particularly for modeling curved shapes and bending without artificial hourglass control or incompatible modes. Nevertheless, second‐order brick elements are not contained in typical explicit solid dynamic programs and unsuccessful attempts to develop reliable ones have been reported. In this paper, 27‐node formulations, one for compressible and one for nearly incompressible materials, are presented and evaluated using non‐uniform row summation mass lumping in a wide range of nonlinear example problems. The performance is assessed in standard benchmark problems and in large practical applications using various hyperelastic and inelastic material models and involving very large strains/deformations, severe distortions, and contact‐impact. Comparisons are also made with several first‐order elements and other second‐order hexahedral formulations. The offered elements are the only second‐order ones that performed satisfactorily in all examples, and performed generally at least as well as mass lumped first‐order bricks. It is shown that the row summation lumping is vital for robust performance and selection of Lagrange over serendipity elements and high‐order quadrature rules are more crucial with explicit than with static/implicit methods. Whereas the reliable performance is frequently attained at significant computational expense compared with some first‐order brick types, these elements are shown to be computationally competitive in flexure and with other first‐order elements. These second‐order elements are shown to be viable for large practical applications, especially using today's parallel computers. Published in 2010 by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
doi_str_mv 10.1002/nme.3003
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_896234756</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>896234756</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3653-b69870095162d77c52b367990265dc029a9c966099dc02e4ffb89386805640513</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp10E1rGzEQBmBRWqibBvoTdCnpZdPRypJWxzRfLbhpMAmBXISsncVKtJIjrYn977PGJreexKCHd4aXkG8MThlA_TP2eMoB-AcyYaBVBTWoj2QyfulK6IZ9Jl9KeQJgTACfkMc5Bm8XAWlBl2Jbpdxipkvc2CW22QaKAXuMQ6FdyhQ3q-CdH2iPwzK1hfpIY4rBR7SZlhR8S9tttL135Sv51NlQ8PjwHpH7q8u789_V7N_1n_OzWeW4FLxaSN0oAC2YrFulnKgXXCqtoZaidePZVjstJWi9m3DadYtG80Y2IOQUBONH5GSfu8rpZY1lML0vDkOwEdO6mEbLmk-VkKP8sZcup1IydmaVfW_z1jAwu_bM2J7ZtTfS74dQW5wNXbbR-fLua95wwRmMrtq7Vx9w-988c_P38pB78L4MuHn3Nj8bqbgS5uHm2swvrn493s5hXPMGm8qLlQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>896234756</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Reliable second-order hexahedral elements for explicit methods in nonlinear solid dynamics</title><source>Access via Wiley Online Library</source><creator>Danielson, Kent T. ; O'Daniel, James L.</creator><creatorcontrib>Danielson, Kent T. ; O'Daniel, James L.</creatorcontrib><description>Second‐order hexahedral elements are common in static and implicit dynamic finite element codes for nonlinear solid mechanics. Although probably not as popular as first‐order elements, they can perform better in many circumstances, particularly for modeling curved shapes and bending without artificial hourglass control or incompatible modes. Nevertheless, second‐order brick elements are not contained in typical explicit solid dynamic programs and unsuccessful attempts to develop reliable ones have been reported. In this paper, 27‐node formulations, one for compressible and one for nearly incompressible materials, are presented and evaluated using non‐uniform row summation mass lumping in a wide range of nonlinear example problems. The performance is assessed in standard benchmark problems and in large practical applications using various hyperelastic and inelastic material models and involving very large strains/deformations, severe distortions, and contact‐impact. Comparisons are also made with several first‐order elements and other second‐order hexahedral formulations. The offered elements are the only second‐order ones that performed satisfactorily in all examples, and performed generally at least as well as mass lumped first‐order bricks. It is shown that the row summation lumping is vital for robust performance and selection of Lagrange over serendipity elements and high‐order quadrature rules are more crucial with explicit than with static/implicit methods. Whereas the reliable performance is frequently attained at significant computational expense compared with some first‐order brick types, these elements are shown to be computationally competitive in flexure and with other first‐order elements. These second‐order elements are shown to be viable for large practical applications, especially using today's parallel computers. Published in 2010 by John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0029-5981</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1097-0207</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1097-0207</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/nme.3003</identifier><identifier>CODEN: IJNMBH</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Chichester, UK: John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd</publisher><subject>Brick ; Computation ; Exact sciences and technology ; Expenses ; explicit time integration ; Fundamental areas of phenomenology (including applications) ; Inelastic materials ; Inelasticity (thermoplasticity, viscoplasticity...) ; Lumping ; mass lumping ; mass matrix diagonalization ; Mathematical models ; Mathematics ; Nonlinear dynamics ; nonlinear solid dynamics ; Nonlinearity ; Numerical analysis ; Numerical analysis. Scientific computation ; Numerical approximation ; Physics ; Sciences and techniques of general use ; second-order finite elements ; Solid mechanics ; Static elasticity (thermoelasticity...) ; Structural and continuum mechanics</subject><ispartof>International journal for numerical methods in engineering, 2011-03, Vol.85 (9), p.1073-1102</ispartof><rights>This article is a U.S. Government work and is in the public domain in the U.S.A. Published in 2010 by John Wiley © Sons, Ltd.</rights><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3653-b69870095162d77c52b367990265dc029a9c966099dc02e4ffb89386805640513</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3653-b69870095162d77c52b367990265dc029a9c966099dc02e4ffb89386805640513</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Fnme.3003$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Fnme.3003$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1417,27924,27925,45574,45575</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=23835310$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Danielson, Kent T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>O'Daniel, James L.</creatorcontrib><title>Reliable second-order hexahedral elements for explicit methods in nonlinear solid dynamics</title><title>International journal for numerical methods in engineering</title><addtitle>Int. J. Numer. Meth. Engng</addtitle><description>Second‐order hexahedral elements are common in static and implicit dynamic finite element codes for nonlinear solid mechanics. Although probably not as popular as first‐order elements, they can perform better in many circumstances, particularly for modeling curved shapes and bending without artificial hourglass control or incompatible modes. Nevertheless, second‐order brick elements are not contained in typical explicit solid dynamic programs and unsuccessful attempts to develop reliable ones have been reported. In this paper, 27‐node formulations, one for compressible and one for nearly incompressible materials, are presented and evaluated using non‐uniform row summation mass lumping in a wide range of nonlinear example problems. The performance is assessed in standard benchmark problems and in large practical applications using various hyperelastic and inelastic material models and involving very large strains/deformations, severe distortions, and contact‐impact. Comparisons are also made with several first‐order elements and other second‐order hexahedral formulations. The offered elements are the only second‐order ones that performed satisfactorily in all examples, and performed generally at least as well as mass lumped first‐order bricks. It is shown that the row summation lumping is vital for robust performance and selection of Lagrange over serendipity elements and high‐order quadrature rules are more crucial with explicit than with static/implicit methods. Whereas the reliable performance is frequently attained at significant computational expense compared with some first‐order brick types, these elements are shown to be computationally competitive in flexure and with other first‐order elements. These second‐order elements are shown to be viable for large practical applications, especially using today's parallel computers. Published in 2010 by John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd.</description><subject>Brick</subject><subject>Computation</subject><subject>Exact sciences and technology</subject><subject>Expenses</subject><subject>explicit time integration</subject><subject>Fundamental areas of phenomenology (including applications)</subject><subject>Inelastic materials</subject><subject>Inelasticity (thermoplasticity, viscoplasticity...)</subject><subject>Lumping</subject><subject>mass lumping</subject><subject>mass matrix diagonalization</subject><subject>Mathematical models</subject><subject>Mathematics</subject><subject>Nonlinear dynamics</subject><subject>nonlinear solid dynamics</subject><subject>Nonlinearity</subject><subject>Numerical analysis</subject><subject>Numerical analysis. Scientific computation</subject><subject>Numerical approximation</subject><subject>Physics</subject><subject>Sciences and techniques of general use</subject><subject>second-order finite elements</subject><subject>Solid mechanics</subject><subject>Static elasticity (thermoelasticity...)</subject><subject>Structural and continuum mechanics</subject><issn>0029-5981</issn><issn>1097-0207</issn><issn>1097-0207</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2011</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp10E1rGzEQBmBRWqibBvoTdCnpZdPRypJWxzRfLbhpMAmBXISsncVKtJIjrYn977PGJreexKCHd4aXkG8MThlA_TP2eMoB-AcyYaBVBTWoj2QyfulK6IZ9Jl9KeQJgTACfkMc5Bm8XAWlBl2Jbpdxipkvc2CW22QaKAXuMQ6FdyhQ3q-CdH2iPwzK1hfpIY4rBR7SZlhR8S9tttL135Sv51NlQ8PjwHpH7q8u789_V7N_1n_OzWeW4FLxaSN0oAC2YrFulnKgXXCqtoZaidePZVjstJWi9m3DadYtG80Y2IOQUBONH5GSfu8rpZY1lML0vDkOwEdO6mEbLmk-VkKP8sZcup1IydmaVfW_z1jAwu_bM2J7ZtTfS74dQW5wNXbbR-fLua95wwRmMrtq7Vx9w-988c_P38pB78L4MuHn3Nj8bqbgS5uHm2swvrn493s5hXPMGm8qLlQ</recordid><startdate>20110304</startdate><enddate>20110304</enddate><creator>Danielson, Kent T.</creator><creator>O'Daniel, James L.</creator><general>John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd</general><general>Wiley</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SC</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>L~C</scope><scope>L~D</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20110304</creationdate><title>Reliable second-order hexahedral elements for explicit methods in nonlinear solid dynamics</title><author>Danielson, Kent T. ; O'Daniel, James L.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3653-b69870095162d77c52b367990265dc029a9c966099dc02e4ffb89386805640513</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2011</creationdate><topic>Brick</topic><topic>Computation</topic><topic>Exact sciences and technology</topic><topic>Expenses</topic><topic>explicit time integration</topic><topic>Fundamental areas of phenomenology (including applications)</topic><topic>Inelastic materials</topic><topic>Inelasticity (thermoplasticity, viscoplasticity...)</topic><topic>Lumping</topic><topic>mass lumping</topic><topic>mass matrix diagonalization</topic><topic>Mathematical models</topic><topic>Mathematics</topic><topic>Nonlinear dynamics</topic><topic>nonlinear solid dynamics</topic><topic>Nonlinearity</topic><topic>Numerical analysis</topic><topic>Numerical analysis. Scientific computation</topic><topic>Numerical approximation</topic><topic>Physics</topic><topic>Sciences and techniques of general use</topic><topic>second-order finite elements</topic><topic>Solid mechanics</topic><topic>Static elasticity (thermoelasticity...)</topic><topic>Structural and continuum mechanics</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Danielson, Kent T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>O'Daniel, James L.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts</collection><collection>Mechanical &amp; Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts – Academic</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Professional</collection><jtitle>International journal for numerical methods in engineering</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Danielson, Kent T.</au><au>O'Daniel, James L.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Reliable second-order hexahedral elements for explicit methods in nonlinear solid dynamics</atitle><jtitle>International journal for numerical methods in engineering</jtitle><addtitle>Int. J. Numer. Meth. Engng</addtitle><date>2011-03-04</date><risdate>2011</risdate><volume>85</volume><issue>9</issue><spage>1073</spage><epage>1102</epage><pages>1073-1102</pages><issn>0029-5981</issn><issn>1097-0207</issn><eissn>1097-0207</eissn><coden>IJNMBH</coden><abstract>Second‐order hexahedral elements are common in static and implicit dynamic finite element codes for nonlinear solid mechanics. Although probably not as popular as first‐order elements, they can perform better in many circumstances, particularly for modeling curved shapes and bending without artificial hourglass control or incompatible modes. Nevertheless, second‐order brick elements are not contained in typical explicit solid dynamic programs and unsuccessful attempts to develop reliable ones have been reported. In this paper, 27‐node formulations, one for compressible and one for nearly incompressible materials, are presented and evaluated using non‐uniform row summation mass lumping in a wide range of nonlinear example problems. The performance is assessed in standard benchmark problems and in large practical applications using various hyperelastic and inelastic material models and involving very large strains/deformations, severe distortions, and contact‐impact. Comparisons are also made with several first‐order elements and other second‐order hexahedral formulations. The offered elements are the only second‐order ones that performed satisfactorily in all examples, and performed generally at least as well as mass lumped first‐order bricks. It is shown that the row summation lumping is vital for robust performance and selection of Lagrange over serendipity elements and high‐order quadrature rules are more crucial with explicit than with static/implicit methods. Whereas the reliable performance is frequently attained at significant computational expense compared with some first‐order brick types, these elements are shown to be computationally competitive in flexure and with other first‐order elements. These second‐order elements are shown to be viable for large practical applications, especially using today's parallel computers. Published in 2010 by John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd.</abstract><cop>Chichester, UK</cop><pub>John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd</pub><doi>10.1002/nme.3003</doi><tpages>30</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0029-5981
ispartof International journal for numerical methods in engineering, 2011-03, Vol.85 (9), p.1073-1102
issn 0029-5981
1097-0207
1097-0207
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_896234756
source Access via Wiley Online Library
subjects Brick
Computation
Exact sciences and technology
Expenses
explicit time integration
Fundamental areas of phenomenology (including applications)
Inelastic materials
Inelasticity (thermoplasticity, viscoplasticity...)
Lumping
mass lumping
mass matrix diagonalization
Mathematical models
Mathematics
Nonlinear dynamics
nonlinear solid dynamics
Nonlinearity
Numerical analysis
Numerical analysis. Scientific computation
Numerical approximation
Physics
Sciences and techniques of general use
second-order finite elements
Solid mechanics
Static elasticity (thermoelasticity...)
Structural and continuum mechanics
title Reliable second-order hexahedral elements for explicit methods in nonlinear solid dynamics
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-02T11%3A15%3A30IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Reliable%20second-order%20hexahedral%20elements%20for%20explicit%20methods%20in%20nonlinear%20solid%20dynamics&rft.jtitle=International%20journal%20for%20numerical%20methods%20in%20engineering&rft.au=Danielson,%20Kent%20T.&rft.date=2011-03-04&rft.volume=85&rft.issue=9&rft.spage=1073&rft.epage=1102&rft.pages=1073-1102&rft.issn=0029-5981&rft.eissn=1097-0207&rft.coden=IJNMBH&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/nme.3003&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E896234756%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=896234756&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true