A new framework for modeling the migration of meandering rivers

Many models of river meander migration rely upon a simple formalism, whereby the eroding bank is cut back at a rate that is dictated by the flow, and the depositing bank then migrates passively in response, so as to maintain a constant bankfull channel width. Here a new model is presented, in which...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Earth surface processes and landforms 2011-01, Vol.36 (1), p.70-86
Hauptverfasser: Parker, G., Shimizu, Y., Wilkerson, G. V., Eke, E. C., Abad, J. D., Lauer, J. W., Paola, C., Dietrich, W. E., Voller, V. R.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 86
container_issue 1
container_start_page 70
container_title Earth surface processes and landforms
container_volume 36
creator Parker, G.
Shimizu, Y.
Wilkerson, G. V.
Eke, E. C.
Abad, J. D.
Lauer, J. W.
Paola, C.
Dietrich, W. E.
Voller, V. R.
description Many models of river meander migration rely upon a simple formalism, whereby the eroding bank is cut back at a rate that is dictated by the flow, and the depositing bank then migrates passively in response, so as to maintain a constant bankfull channel width. Here a new model is presented, in which separate relations are developed for the migration of the eroding bank and the depositing bank. It is assumed that the eroding bank consists of a layer of fine‐grained sediment that is cohesive and/or densely riddled with roots, underlain by a purely noncohesive layer of sand and/or gravel. Following erosion of the noncohesive layer, the cohesive layer fails in the form of slump blocks, which armor the noncohesive layer and thereby moderate the erosion rate. If the slump block material breaks down or is fluvially entrained, the protection it provides for the noncohesive layer diminishes and bank erosion is renewed. Renewed bank erosion, however, rejuvenates slump block armoring. At the depositing bank, it is assumed that all the sediment delivered to the edge of vegetation due to the transverse component of sediment transport is captured by encroaching vegetation, which is not removed by successive floods. Separate equations describing the migration of the eroding and depositing banks are tied to a standard morphodynamic formulation for the evolution of the flow and bed in the central region of the channel. In this model, the river evolves toward maintenance of roughly constant bankfull width as it migrates only to the extent that the eroding bank and depositing bank ‘talk’ to each other via the medium of the morphodynamics of the channel center region. The model allows for both (a) migration for which erosion widens the channel, forcing deposition at the opposite bank, and (b) migration for which deposition narrows the channel forcing erosion at the opposite bank. Copyright © 2010 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
doi_str_mv 10.1002/esp.2113
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_896215043</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>896215043</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a4543-2d48a4bbdaca08d25ad41d09fe5370932cc1b075f0ffa6fa0287b5afefad91d93</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp10EtPAjEUhuHGaCKiiT9hNkY3g70Nna6MMQga4yV4WTaH6SlW5oItiP57h0DcuTqL8-RbvIQcM9pjlPJzjPMeZ0zskA6jup_qXKhd0qFMq1QLofbJQYwflDImc90hF5dJjavEBahw1YRZ4pqQVI3F0tfTZPGOSeWnARa-qZPGJRVCbTGsf8F_YYiHZM9BGfFoe7vk5XrwfDVK7x6GN1eXdynITIqUW5mDnEwsFEBzyzOwklmqHWZCUS14UbAJVZmjzkHfAeW5mmTg0IHVzGrRJaeb3XloPpcYF6byscCyhBqbZTS57nOWUSlaebaRRWhiDOjMPPgKwo9h1KwTmTaRWSdq6cl2FGIBZRuhLnz881xyqTLJWpdu3MqX-PPvnhmMH7e7W-_jAr__PISZ6SuhMvN2PzS3-XB0_zoemyfxC-CqhD0</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>896215043</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A new framework for modeling the migration of meandering rivers</title><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Parker, G. ; Shimizu, Y. ; Wilkerson, G. V. ; Eke, E. C. ; Abad, J. D. ; Lauer, J. W. ; Paola, C. ; Dietrich, W. E. ; Voller, V. R.</creator><creatorcontrib>Parker, G. ; Shimizu, Y. ; Wilkerson, G. V. ; Eke, E. C. ; Abad, J. D. ; Lauer, J. W. ; Paola, C. ; Dietrich, W. E. ; Voller, V. R.</creatorcontrib><description>Many models of river meander migration rely upon a simple formalism, whereby the eroding bank is cut back at a rate that is dictated by the flow, and the depositing bank then migrates passively in response, so as to maintain a constant bankfull channel width. Here a new model is presented, in which separate relations are developed for the migration of the eroding bank and the depositing bank. It is assumed that the eroding bank consists of a layer of fine‐grained sediment that is cohesive and/or densely riddled with roots, underlain by a purely noncohesive layer of sand and/or gravel. Following erosion of the noncohesive layer, the cohesive layer fails in the form of slump blocks, which armor the noncohesive layer and thereby moderate the erosion rate. If the slump block material breaks down or is fluvially entrained, the protection it provides for the noncohesive layer diminishes and bank erosion is renewed. Renewed bank erosion, however, rejuvenates slump block armoring. At the depositing bank, it is assumed that all the sediment delivered to the edge of vegetation due to the transverse component of sediment transport is captured by encroaching vegetation, which is not removed by successive floods. Separate equations describing the migration of the eroding and depositing banks are tied to a standard morphodynamic formulation for the evolution of the flow and bed in the central region of the channel. In this model, the river evolves toward maintenance of roughly constant bankfull width as it migrates only to the extent that the eroding bank and depositing bank ‘talk’ to each other via the medium of the morphodynamics of the channel center region. The model allows for both (a) migration for which erosion widens the channel, forcing deposition at the opposite bank, and (b) migration for which deposition narrows the channel forcing erosion at the opposite bank. Copyright © 2010 John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0197-9337</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1096-9837</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1096-9837</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/esp.2113</identifier><identifier>CODEN: ESPLDB</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Chichester, UK: John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd</publisher><subject>armoring ; bank deposition ; Bank erosion ; Bgi / Prodig ; channel width ; Channels ; Deposition ; Fluvial forms and processes ; Geomorphology ; Mathematical models ; meandering ; Migration ; Physical geography ; Rivers ; Sand ; Vegetation</subject><ispartof>Earth surface processes and landforms, 2011-01, Vol.36 (1), p.70-86</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2010 John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd.</rights><rights>Tous droits réservés © Prodig - Bibliographie Géographique Internationale (BGI), 2011</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a4543-2d48a4bbdaca08d25ad41d09fe5370932cc1b075f0ffa6fa0287b5afefad91d93</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a4543-2d48a4bbdaca08d25ad41d09fe5370932cc1b075f0ffa6fa0287b5afefad91d93</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Fesp.2113$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Fesp.2113$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27901,27902,45550,45551</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=24247541$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Parker, G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shimizu, Y.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wilkerson, G. V.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Eke, E. C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Abad, J. D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lauer, J. W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Paola, C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dietrich, W. E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Voller, V. R.</creatorcontrib><title>A new framework for modeling the migration of meandering rivers</title><title>Earth surface processes and landforms</title><addtitle>Earth Surf. Process. Landforms</addtitle><description>Many models of river meander migration rely upon a simple formalism, whereby the eroding bank is cut back at a rate that is dictated by the flow, and the depositing bank then migrates passively in response, so as to maintain a constant bankfull channel width. Here a new model is presented, in which separate relations are developed for the migration of the eroding bank and the depositing bank. It is assumed that the eroding bank consists of a layer of fine‐grained sediment that is cohesive and/or densely riddled with roots, underlain by a purely noncohesive layer of sand and/or gravel. Following erosion of the noncohesive layer, the cohesive layer fails in the form of slump blocks, which armor the noncohesive layer and thereby moderate the erosion rate. If the slump block material breaks down or is fluvially entrained, the protection it provides for the noncohesive layer diminishes and bank erosion is renewed. Renewed bank erosion, however, rejuvenates slump block armoring. At the depositing bank, it is assumed that all the sediment delivered to the edge of vegetation due to the transverse component of sediment transport is captured by encroaching vegetation, which is not removed by successive floods. Separate equations describing the migration of the eroding and depositing banks are tied to a standard morphodynamic formulation for the evolution of the flow and bed in the central region of the channel. In this model, the river evolves toward maintenance of roughly constant bankfull width as it migrates only to the extent that the eroding bank and depositing bank ‘talk’ to each other via the medium of the morphodynamics of the channel center region. The model allows for both (a) migration for which erosion widens the channel, forcing deposition at the opposite bank, and (b) migration for which deposition narrows the channel forcing erosion at the opposite bank. Copyright © 2010 John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd.</description><subject>armoring</subject><subject>bank deposition</subject><subject>Bank erosion</subject><subject>Bgi / Prodig</subject><subject>channel width</subject><subject>Channels</subject><subject>Deposition</subject><subject>Fluvial forms and processes</subject><subject>Geomorphology</subject><subject>Mathematical models</subject><subject>meandering</subject><subject>Migration</subject><subject>Physical geography</subject><subject>Rivers</subject><subject>Sand</subject><subject>Vegetation</subject><issn>0197-9337</issn><issn>1096-9837</issn><issn>1096-9837</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2011</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp10EtPAjEUhuHGaCKiiT9hNkY3g70Nna6MMQga4yV4WTaH6SlW5oItiP57h0DcuTqL8-RbvIQcM9pjlPJzjPMeZ0zskA6jup_qXKhd0qFMq1QLofbJQYwflDImc90hF5dJjavEBahw1YRZ4pqQVI3F0tfTZPGOSeWnARa-qZPGJRVCbTGsf8F_YYiHZM9BGfFoe7vk5XrwfDVK7x6GN1eXdynITIqUW5mDnEwsFEBzyzOwklmqHWZCUS14UbAJVZmjzkHfAeW5mmTg0IHVzGrRJaeb3XloPpcYF6byscCyhBqbZTS57nOWUSlaebaRRWhiDOjMPPgKwo9h1KwTmTaRWSdq6cl2FGIBZRuhLnz881xyqTLJWpdu3MqX-PPvnhmMH7e7W-_jAr__PISZ6SuhMvN2PzS3-XB0_zoemyfxC-CqhD0</recordid><startdate>201101</startdate><enddate>201101</enddate><creator>Parker, G.</creator><creator>Shimizu, Y.</creator><creator>Wilkerson, G. V.</creator><creator>Eke, E. C.</creator><creator>Abad, J. D.</creator><creator>Lauer, J. W.</creator><creator>Paola, C.</creator><creator>Dietrich, W. E.</creator><creator>Voller, V. R.</creator><general>John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd</general><general>Wiley</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>KR7</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201101</creationdate><title>A new framework for modeling the migration of meandering rivers</title><author>Parker, G. ; Shimizu, Y. ; Wilkerson, G. V. ; Eke, E. C. ; Abad, J. D. ; Lauer, J. W. ; Paola, C. ; Dietrich, W. E. ; Voller, V. R.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a4543-2d48a4bbdaca08d25ad41d09fe5370932cc1b075f0ffa6fa0287b5afefad91d93</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2011</creationdate><topic>armoring</topic><topic>bank deposition</topic><topic>Bank erosion</topic><topic>Bgi / Prodig</topic><topic>channel width</topic><topic>Channels</topic><topic>Deposition</topic><topic>Fluvial forms and processes</topic><topic>Geomorphology</topic><topic>Mathematical models</topic><topic>meandering</topic><topic>Migration</topic><topic>Physical geography</topic><topic>Rivers</topic><topic>Sand</topic><topic>Vegetation</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Parker, G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shimizu, Y.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wilkerson, G. V.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Eke, E. C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Abad, J. D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lauer, J. W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Paola, C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dietrich, W. E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Voller, V. R.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Earth surface processes and landforms</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Parker, G.</au><au>Shimizu, Y.</au><au>Wilkerson, G. V.</au><au>Eke, E. C.</au><au>Abad, J. D.</au><au>Lauer, J. W.</au><au>Paola, C.</au><au>Dietrich, W. E.</au><au>Voller, V. R.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A new framework for modeling the migration of meandering rivers</atitle><jtitle>Earth surface processes and landforms</jtitle><addtitle>Earth Surf. Process. Landforms</addtitle><date>2011-01</date><risdate>2011</risdate><volume>36</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>70</spage><epage>86</epage><pages>70-86</pages><issn>0197-9337</issn><issn>1096-9837</issn><eissn>1096-9837</eissn><coden>ESPLDB</coden><abstract>Many models of river meander migration rely upon a simple formalism, whereby the eroding bank is cut back at a rate that is dictated by the flow, and the depositing bank then migrates passively in response, so as to maintain a constant bankfull channel width. Here a new model is presented, in which separate relations are developed for the migration of the eroding bank and the depositing bank. It is assumed that the eroding bank consists of a layer of fine‐grained sediment that is cohesive and/or densely riddled with roots, underlain by a purely noncohesive layer of sand and/or gravel. Following erosion of the noncohesive layer, the cohesive layer fails in the form of slump blocks, which armor the noncohesive layer and thereby moderate the erosion rate. If the slump block material breaks down or is fluvially entrained, the protection it provides for the noncohesive layer diminishes and bank erosion is renewed. Renewed bank erosion, however, rejuvenates slump block armoring. At the depositing bank, it is assumed that all the sediment delivered to the edge of vegetation due to the transverse component of sediment transport is captured by encroaching vegetation, which is not removed by successive floods. Separate equations describing the migration of the eroding and depositing banks are tied to a standard morphodynamic formulation for the evolution of the flow and bed in the central region of the channel. In this model, the river evolves toward maintenance of roughly constant bankfull width as it migrates only to the extent that the eroding bank and depositing bank ‘talk’ to each other via the medium of the morphodynamics of the channel center region. The model allows for both (a) migration for which erosion widens the channel, forcing deposition at the opposite bank, and (b) migration for which deposition narrows the channel forcing erosion at the opposite bank. Copyright © 2010 John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd.</abstract><cop>Chichester, UK</cop><pub>John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd</pub><doi>10.1002/esp.2113</doi><tpages>17</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0197-9337
ispartof Earth surface processes and landforms, 2011-01, Vol.36 (1), p.70-86
issn 0197-9337
1096-9837
1096-9837
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_896215043
source Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete
subjects armoring
bank deposition
Bank erosion
Bgi / Prodig
channel width
Channels
Deposition
Fluvial forms and processes
Geomorphology
Mathematical models
meandering
Migration
Physical geography
Rivers
Sand
Vegetation
title A new framework for modeling the migration of meandering rivers
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-09T12%3A33%3A33IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20new%20framework%20for%20modeling%20the%20migration%20of%20meandering%20rivers&rft.jtitle=Earth%20surface%20processes%20and%20landforms&rft.au=Parker,%20G.&rft.date=2011-01&rft.volume=36&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=70&rft.epage=86&rft.pages=70-86&rft.issn=0197-9337&rft.eissn=1096-9837&rft.coden=ESPLDB&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/esp.2113&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E896215043%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=896215043&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true