Casting despots in Dutch drama

By 1745, the Persian ruler Nadir Shah (also known as Tahmasp Quli Khan) had made a name for himself as a conqueror in Asia. In the same year, the Dutch playwright Frans van Steenwyk scripted a play titled Thamas Koelikan in Amsterdam. The play not only chose Nadir for protagonist, but also identifie...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The Indian economic and social history review 2011-04, Vol.48 (2), p.241-286
1. Verfasser: Kuruppath, Manjusha
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 286
container_issue 2
container_start_page 241
container_title The Indian economic and social history review
container_volume 48
creator Kuruppath, Manjusha
description By 1745, the Persian ruler Nadir Shah (also known as Tahmasp Quli Khan) had made a name for himself as a conqueror in Asia. In the same year, the Dutch playwright Frans van Steenwyk scripted a play titled Thamas Koelikan in Amsterdam. The play not only chose Nadir for protagonist, but also identified his conquest of Mughal India as the backdrop to the drama. Just as Van Steenwyk's drama reflected the curiosity of his peers in Nadir Shah, another image of Asian rulers circulating in Europe at the same time also featured in the play-the image of the Oriental Despot. Although the theme of Oriental Despotism was a generic application to Asian rulers, the relationship of this label with Nadir Shah was more intimate. From the late eighteenth century onwards, any mention of Nadir Shah meant a reference to Oriental Despotism. This article analyses the nature of representation of Nadir Shah in Van Steenwyk's Thamas Koelikan. It studies the means by which the notion of Oriental Despotism features in the play. It argues that the observations made in this regard should be seen in the light of the sources that the playwright employed in penning his play. This related closely to the world of the Dutch East India Company in South Asia. [Reprinted by permission of Sage Publications Ltd., copyright holder.]
doi_str_mv 10.1177/001946461104800204
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_896199650</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>896199650</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c810-669d1692977e1ad6cc14f9e6706995461c6b80e0f140cebb2442bf51e7b725423</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNotzj1vwjAQxnEPVIJSvkAHlK1T2jvHOfvGKn2VkLqwI9u5lKCQUJx8_4La6ZF-w6O_UvcIj4jWPgEgGzKECMYBaDAztbhiftW5uk3pcOHCWV6odeXT2PbfWS3pNIwpa_vsZRrjPqvP_ujv1E3juySr_12q7dvrtvrIN1_vn9XzJo8OISfiGok1Wyvoa4oRTcNCFoi5vJRECg4EGjQQJQRtjA5NiWKD1aXRxVI9_N2ezsPPJGncHdsUpet8L8OUdo4JmamE4hfCGj1D</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>896199650</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Casting despots in Dutch drama</title><source>SAGE Journals</source><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><creator>Kuruppath, Manjusha</creator><creatorcontrib>Kuruppath, Manjusha</creatorcontrib><description>By 1745, the Persian ruler Nadir Shah (also known as Tahmasp Quli Khan) had made a name for himself as a conqueror in Asia. In the same year, the Dutch playwright Frans van Steenwyk scripted a play titled Thamas Koelikan in Amsterdam. The play not only chose Nadir for protagonist, but also identified his conquest of Mughal India as the backdrop to the drama. Just as Van Steenwyk's drama reflected the curiosity of his peers in Nadir Shah, another image of Asian rulers circulating in Europe at the same time also featured in the play-the image of the Oriental Despot. Although the theme of Oriental Despotism was a generic application to Asian rulers, the relationship of this label with Nadir Shah was more intimate. From the late eighteenth century onwards, any mention of Nadir Shah meant a reference to Oriental Despotism. This article analyses the nature of representation of Nadir Shah in Van Steenwyk's Thamas Koelikan. It studies the means by which the notion of Oriental Despotism features in the play. It argues that the observations made in this regard should be seen in the light of the sources that the playwright employed in penning his play. This related closely to the world of the Dutch East India Company in South Asia. [Reprinted by permission of Sage Publications Ltd., copyright holder.]</description><identifier>ISSN: 0019-4646</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/001946461104800204</identifier><identifier>CODEN: IESRDO</identifier><language>eng</language><subject>Asia ; Despotism ; Eighteenth Century ; Heroes ; India ; Netherlands ; Peers ; South Asia</subject><ispartof>The Indian economic and social history review, 2011-04, Vol.48 (2), p.241-286</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c810-669d1692977e1ad6cc14f9e6706995461c6b80e0f140cebb2442bf51e7b725423</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,33775</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kuruppath, Manjusha</creatorcontrib><title>Casting despots in Dutch drama</title><title>The Indian economic and social history review</title><description>By 1745, the Persian ruler Nadir Shah (also known as Tahmasp Quli Khan) had made a name for himself as a conqueror in Asia. In the same year, the Dutch playwright Frans van Steenwyk scripted a play titled Thamas Koelikan in Amsterdam. The play not only chose Nadir for protagonist, but also identified his conquest of Mughal India as the backdrop to the drama. Just as Van Steenwyk's drama reflected the curiosity of his peers in Nadir Shah, another image of Asian rulers circulating in Europe at the same time also featured in the play-the image of the Oriental Despot. Although the theme of Oriental Despotism was a generic application to Asian rulers, the relationship of this label with Nadir Shah was more intimate. From the late eighteenth century onwards, any mention of Nadir Shah meant a reference to Oriental Despotism. This article analyses the nature of representation of Nadir Shah in Van Steenwyk's Thamas Koelikan. It studies the means by which the notion of Oriental Despotism features in the play. It argues that the observations made in this regard should be seen in the light of the sources that the playwright employed in penning his play. This related closely to the world of the Dutch East India Company in South Asia. [Reprinted by permission of Sage Publications Ltd., copyright holder.]</description><subject>Asia</subject><subject>Despotism</subject><subject>Eighteenth Century</subject><subject>Heroes</subject><subject>India</subject><subject>Netherlands</subject><subject>Peers</subject><subject>South Asia</subject><issn>0019-4646</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2011</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><recordid>eNotzj1vwjAQxnEPVIJSvkAHlK1T2jvHOfvGKn2VkLqwI9u5lKCQUJx8_4La6ZF-w6O_UvcIj4jWPgEgGzKECMYBaDAztbhiftW5uk3pcOHCWV6odeXT2PbfWS3pNIwpa_vsZRrjPqvP_ujv1E3juySr_12q7dvrtvrIN1_vn9XzJo8OISfiGok1Wyvoa4oRTcNCFoi5vJRECg4EGjQQJQRtjA5NiWKD1aXRxVI9_N2ezsPPJGncHdsUpet8L8OUdo4JmamE4hfCGj1D</recordid><startdate>20110401</startdate><enddate>20110401</enddate><creator>Kuruppath, Manjusha</creator><scope>7U4</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>WZK</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20110401</creationdate><title>Casting despots in Dutch drama</title><author>Kuruppath, Manjusha</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c810-669d1692977e1ad6cc14f9e6706995461c6b80e0f140cebb2442bf51e7b725423</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2011</creationdate><topic>Asia</topic><topic>Despotism</topic><topic>Eighteenth Century</topic><topic>Heroes</topic><topic>India</topic><topic>Netherlands</topic><topic>Peers</topic><topic>South Asia</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kuruppath, Manjusha</creatorcontrib><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><jtitle>The Indian economic and social history review</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kuruppath, Manjusha</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Casting despots in Dutch drama</atitle><jtitle>The Indian economic and social history review</jtitle><date>2011-04-01</date><risdate>2011</risdate><volume>48</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>241</spage><epage>286</epage><pages>241-286</pages><issn>0019-4646</issn><coden>IESRDO</coden><abstract>By 1745, the Persian ruler Nadir Shah (also known as Tahmasp Quli Khan) had made a name for himself as a conqueror in Asia. In the same year, the Dutch playwright Frans van Steenwyk scripted a play titled Thamas Koelikan in Amsterdam. The play not only chose Nadir for protagonist, but also identified his conquest of Mughal India as the backdrop to the drama. Just as Van Steenwyk's drama reflected the curiosity of his peers in Nadir Shah, another image of Asian rulers circulating in Europe at the same time also featured in the play-the image of the Oriental Despot. Although the theme of Oriental Despotism was a generic application to Asian rulers, the relationship of this label with Nadir Shah was more intimate. From the late eighteenth century onwards, any mention of Nadir Shah meant a reference to Oriental Despotism. This article analyses the nature of representation of Nadir Shah in Van Steenwyk's Thamas Koelikan. It studies the means by which the notion of Oriental Despotism features in the play. It argues that the observations made in this regard should be seen in the light of the sources that the playwright employed in penning his play. This related closely to the world of the Dutch East India Company in South Asia. [Reprinted by permission of Sage Publications Ltd., copyright holder.]</abstract><doi>10.1177/001946461104800204</doi><tpages>46</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0019-4646
ispartof The Indian economic and social history review, 2011-04, Vol.48 (2), p.241-286
issn 0019-4646
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_896199650
source SAGE Journals; Sociological Abstracts
subjects Asia
Despotism
Eighteenth Century
Heroes
India
Netherlands
Peers
South Asia
title Casting despots in Dutch drama
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-28T12%3A02%3A46IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Casting%20despots%20in%20Dutch%20drama&rft.jtitle=The%20Indian%20economic%20and%20social%20history%20review&rft.au=Kuruppath,%20Manjusha&rft.date=2011-04-01&rft.volume=48&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=241&rft.epage=286&rft.pages=241-286&rft.issn=0019-4646&rft.coden=IESRDO&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/001946461104800204&rft_dat=%3Cproquest%3E896199650%3C/proquest%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=896199650&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true