Predictors of foster care exits to permanency: A competing risks analysis of reunification, guardianship, and adoption

Although foster care is intended to be temporary, and policy explicitly requires permanency outcomes, many children experience lengthy stays and exit foster care without a permanent family. This study sought to identify which child and placement characteristics were important predictors of exit to t...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Children and youth services review 2011-06, Vol.33 (6), p.999-1011
1. Verfasser: Akin, Becci A.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1011
container_issue 6
container_start_page 999
container_title Children and youth services review
container_volume 33
creator Akin, Becci A.
description Although foster care is intended to be temporary, and policy explicitly requires permanency outcomes, many children experience lengthy stays and exit foster care without a permanent family. This study sought to identify which child and placement characteristics were important predictors of exit to three types of permanency outcomes: reunification, guardianship, and adoption. A sample of 3351 children who entered foster care in 2006 was observed for 30 to 42 months. Permanency outcomes were analyzed using competing risks survival analysis. Children exited foster care to different types of permanency at different rates and frequencies. Reunification occurred most quickly and frequently. Guardianship was second in terms of median duration but third in frequency. Adoption was the second most common exit but had the longest median duration. One in four children remained in foster care or exited without permanency. While patterns varied by type of permanency, three major categories of important predictors were identified: 1) demographic characteristics of age at entry and race, 2) clinical needs related to children's disabilities and mental health problems, and 3) continuity and connections represented by kin placements, sibling placements, early stability, and absence of runaway events. Implications for practice, policy, and research are discussed. ► Different types of permanency occurred at different rates and frequencies. ► One in four children remained in foster care or exited without permanency. ► Predictors of permanency were age, race, disabilities, and mental health problems. ► Other predictors were kin placement, intact sibling placements, early stability, and no runaway.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.childyouth.2011.01.008
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_896190057</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0190740911000193</els_id><sourcerecordid>1512193267</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c533t-23d823218f8f0ea70696e99039fe257973b0fa33b74ce9ad0f76f70ac42357603</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFUU1v1DAQjRCVWFr-g29waJaxvbFjbqXiS1QqBzhbrjPuekniYDsr8u_rdBHcqDTPPvi9N555VUUobClQ8fawtXvfd0uY837LgNItlIL2WbWhreS1lKJ5Xm2AKqjlDtSL6mVKBwBoRMM21fFbxM7bHGIiwREXUsZIrIlI8LfPieRAJoyDGXG0yztyRWwYJsx-vCfRp5-JmNH0S_KP8ojz6J23JvswXpL72cTOmzHt_XRZiB0xXZjWt4vqzJk-4as_93n14-OH79ef65vbT1-ur25q23Cea8a7lnFGW9c6QCNBKIFKAVcOWSOV5HfgDOd3cmdRmQ6cFE6CsTvGGymAn1evT75TDL9mTFkPPlns-zJPmJNulSiLgUY-zZSCsZVcmG_-y6QNZVRxJlbT9kS1MaQU0ekp-sHERVPQa3z6oP_Fp9f4NJSCtki_nqQRJ7R_dYhol-J01EfNy-TlWAoeldz4AlEwFSil1hZU7_NQ3N6f3LAs--gx6mR9SbRkH9Fm3QX_9JceAFwawxk</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1512193267</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Predictors of foster care exits to permanency: A competing risks analysis of reunification, guardianship, and adoption</title><source>RePEc</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><source>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><creator>Akin, Becci A.</creator><creatorcontrib>Akin, Becci A.</creatorcontrib><description>Although foster care is intended to be temporary, and policy explicitly requires permanency outcomes, many children experience lengthy stays and exit foster care without a permanent family. This study sought to identify which child and placement characteristics were important predictors of exit to three types of permanency outcomes: reunification, guardianship, and adoption. A sample of 3351 children who entered foster care in 2006 was observed for 30 to 42 months. Permanency outcomes were analyzed using competing risks survival analysis. Children exited foster care to different types of permanency at different rates and frequencies. Reunification occurred most quickly and frequently. Guardianship was second in terms of median duration but third in frequency. Adoption was the second most common exit but had the longest median duration. One in four children remained in foster care or exited without permanency. While patterns varied by type of permanency, three major categories of important predictors were identified: 1) demographic characteristics of age at entry and race, 2) clinical needs related to children's disabilities and mental health problems, and 3) continuity and connections represented by kin placements, sibling placements, early stability, and absence of runaway events. Implications for practice, policy, and research are discussed. ► Different types of permanency occurred at different rates and frequencies. ► One in four children remained in foster care or exited without permanency. ► Predictors of permanency were age, race, disabilities, and mental health problems. ► Other predictors were kin placement, intact sibling placements, early stability, and no runaway.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0190-7409</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-7765</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.childyouth.2011.01.008</identifier><identifier>CODEN: CYSRDU</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Adoption ; Child welfare ; Child welfare Foster care Permanency Reunification Guardianship Adoption ; Children ; Foster Care ; Foster Children ; Guardianship ; Health Problems ; Permanency ; Placement ; Psychiatric disorders ; Reunification ; Risk ; Siblings ; Sociodemographic Factors</subject><ispartof>Children and youth services review, 2011-06, Vol.33 (6), p.999-1011</ispartof><rights>2011 Elsevier Ltd</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c533t-23d823218f8f0ea70696e99039fe257973b0fa33b74ce9ad0f76f70ac42357603</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c533t-23d823218f8f0ea70696e99039fe257973b0fa33b74ce9ad0f76f70ac42357603</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2011.01.008$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3536,3993,27903,27904,30979,33754,45974</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://econpapers.repec.org/article/eeecysrev/v_3a33_3ay_3a2011_3ai_3a6_3ap_3a999-1011.htm$$DView record in RePEc$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Akin, Becci A.</creatorcontrib><title>Predictors of foster care exits to permanency: A competing risks analysis of reunification, guardianship, and adoption</title><title>Children and youth services review</title><description>Although foster care is intended to be temporary, and policy explicitly requires permanency outcomes, many children experience lengthy stays and exit foster care without a permanent family. This study sought to identify which child and placement characteristics were important predictors of exit to three types of permanency outcomes: reunification, guardianship, and adoption. A sample of 3351 children who entered foster care in 2006 was observed for 30 to 42 months. Permanency outcomes were analyzed using competing risks survival analysis. Children exited foster care to different types of permanency at different rates and frequencies. Reunification occurred most quickly and frequently. Guardianship was second in terms of median duration but third in frequency. Adoption was the second most common exit but had the longest median duration. One in four children remained in foster care or exited without permanency. While patterns varied by type of permanency, three major categories of important predictors were identified: 1) demographic characteristics of age at entry and race, 2) clinical needs related to children's disabilities and mental health problems, and 3) continuity and connections represented by kin placements, sibling placements, early stability, and absence of runaway events. Implications for practice, policy, and research are discussed. ► Different types of permanency occurred at different rates and frequencies. ► One in four children remained in foster care or exited without permanency. ► Predictors of permanency were age, race, disabilities, and mental health problems. ► Other predictors were kin placement, intact sibling placements, early stability, and no runaway.</description><subject>Adoption</subject><subject>Child welfare</subject><subject>Child welfare Foster care Permanency Reunification Guardianship Adoption</subject><subject>Children</subject><subject>Foster Care</subject><subject>Foster Children</subject><subject>Guardianship</subject><subject>Health Problems</subject><subject>Permanency</subject><subject>Placement</subject><subject>Psychiatric disorders</subject><subject>Reunification</subject><subject>Risk</subject><subject>Siblings</subject><subject>Sociodemographic Factors</subject><issn>0190-7409</issn><issn>1873-7765</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2011</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>X2L</sourceid><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><recordid>eNqFUU1v1DAQjRCVWFr-g29waJaxvbFjbqXiS1QqBzhbrjPuekniYDsr8u_rdBHcqDTPPvi9N555VUUobClQ8fawtXvfd0uY837LgNItlIL2WbWhreS1lKJ5Xm2AKqjlDtSL6mVKBwBoRMM21fFbxM7bHGIiwREXUsZIrIlI8LfPieRAJoyDGXG0yztyRWwYJsx-vCfRp5-JmNH0S_KP8ojz6J23JvswXpL72cTOmzHt_XRZiB0xXZjWt4vqzJk-4as_93n14-OH79ef65vbT1-ur25q23Cea8a7lnFGW9c6QCNBKIFKAVcOWSOV5HfgDOd3cmdRmQ6cFE6CsTvGGymAn1evT75TDL9mTFkPPlns-zJPmJNulSiLgUY-zZSCsZVcmG_-y6QNZVRxJlbT9kS1MaQU0ekp-sHERVPQa3z6oP_Fp9f4NJSCtki_nqQRJ7R_dYhol-J01EfNy-TlWAoeldz4AlEwFSil1hZU7_NQ3N6f3LAs--gx6mR9SbRkH9Fm3QX_9JceAFwawxk</recordid><startdate>20110601</startdate><enddate>20110601</enddate><creator>Akin, Becci A.</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>DKI</scope><scope>X2L</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>7U1</scope><scope>7U2</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>7U3</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20110601</creationdate><title>Predictors of foster care exits to permanency: A competing risks analysis of reunification, guardianship, and adoption</title><author>Akin, Becci A.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c533t-23d823218f8f0ea70696e99039fe257973b0fa33b74ce9ad0f76f70ac42357603</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2011</creationdate><topic>Adoption</topic><topic>Child welfare</topic><topic>Child welfare Foster care Permanency Reunification Guardianship Adoption</topic><topic>Children</topic><topic>Foster Care</topic><topic>Foster Children</topic><topic>Guardianship</topic><topic>Health Problems</topic><topic>Permanency</topic><topic>Placement</topic><topic>Psychiatric disorders</topic><topic>Reunification</topic><topic>Risk</topic><topic>Siblings</topic><topic>Sociodemographic Factors</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Akin, Becci A.</creatorcontrib><collection>RePEc IDEAS</collection><collection>RePEc</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>Risk Abstracts</collection><collection>Safety Science and Risk</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Social Services Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Children and youth services review</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Akin, Becci A.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Predictors of foster care exits to permanency: A competing risks analysis of reunification, guardianship, and adoption</atitle><jtitle>Children and youth services review</jtitle><date>2011-06-01</date><risdate>2011</risdate><volume>33</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>999</spage><epage>1011</epage><pages>999-1011</pages><issn>0190-7409</issn><eissn>1873-7765</eissn><coden>CYSRDU</coden><abstract>Although foster care is intended to be temporary, and policy explicitly requires permanency outcomes, many children experience lengthy stays and exit foster care without a permanent family. This study sought to identify which child and placement characteristics were important predictors of exit to three types of permanency outcomes: reunification, guardianship, and adoption. A sample of 3351 children who entered foster care in 2006 was observed for 30 to 42 months. Permanency outcomes were analyzed using competing risks survival analysis. Children exited foster care to different types of permanency at different rates and frequencies. Reunification occurred most quickly and frequently. Guardianship was second in terms of median duration but third in frequency. Adoption was the second most common exit but had the longest median duration. One in four children remained in foster care or exited without permanency. While patterns varied by type of permanency, three major categories of important predictors were identified: 1) demographic characteristics of age at entry and race, 2) clinical needs related to children's disabilities and mental health problems, and 3) continuity and connections represented by kin placements, sibling placements, early stability, and absence of runaway events. Implications for practice, policy, and research are discussed. ► Different types of permanency occurred at different rates and frequencies. ► One in four children remained in foster care or exited without permanency. ► Predictors of permanency were age, race, disabilities, and mental health problems. ► Other predictors were kin placement, intact sibling placements, early stability, and no runaway.</abstract><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><doi>10.1016/j.childyouth.2011.01.008</doi><tpages>13</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0190-7409
ispartof Children and youth services review, 2011-06, Vol.33 (6), p.999-1011
issn 0190-7409
1873-7765
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_896190057
source RePEc; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals; Sociological Abstracts; Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)
subjects Adoption
Child welfare
Child welfare Foster care Permanency Reunification Guardianship Adoption
Children
Foster Care
Foster Children
Guardianship
Health Problems
Permanency
Placement
Psychiatric disorders
Reunification
Risk
Siblings
Sociodemographic Factors
title Predictors of foster care exits to permanency: A competing risks analysis of reunification, guardianship, and adoption
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-22T02%3A51%3A54IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Predictors%20of%20foster%20care%20exits%20to%20permanency:%20A%20competing%20risks%20analysis%20of%20reunification,%20guardianship,%20and%20adoption&rft.jtitle=Children%20and%20youth%20services%20review&rft.au=Akin,%20Becci%20A.&rft.date=2011-06-01&rft.volume=33&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=999&rft.epage=1011&rft.pages=999-1011&rft.issn=0190-7409&rft.eissn=1873-7765&rft.coden=CYSRDU&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.childyouth.2011.01.008&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1512193267%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1512193267&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S0190740911000193&rfr_iscdi=true