"Performance Analysis of Content Management Systems Joomla, Drupal and WordPress"
At Present there are lots of open source content management systems (CMS) available in the market. As open source CMS has its own advantages but out of so many only few like Joomla, Drupal, WordPress are popular in the market because of good functionality and support. It is the obvious question for...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | International journal of computer applications 2011-01, Vol.21 (4), p.39-43 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 43 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 4 |
| container_start_page | 39 |
| container_title | International journal of computer applications |
| container_volume | 21 |
| creator | Patel, Savan K Rathod, V R Prajapati, Jigna B |
| description | At Present there are lots of open source content management systems (CMS) available in the market. As open source CMS has its own advantages but out of so many only few like Joomla, Drupal, WordPress are popular in the market because of good functionality and support. It is the obvious question for everyone that, what are the basic reasons that only these CMS are mostly acceptable? Lots of surveys have been done to know which is the best and why? But still it is unanswered. By certain comparison on data we want to show that why mentioned CMS are best in their areas? We also want discover ranking for these three CMS that out of these which one is preferable in which condition. In this paper we are comparing above mentioned CMS by Goggle page rank, their documentation support, their popularity, installation survey and many more. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.5120/2496-3373 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_896188891</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2382196531</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1683-da9c8bedd275a2c031bc5fed7624bd0114e2c1564927c0b4086603f498c468f43</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkEtLAzEUhYMoWLQL_0HoRgRH85o8lqW-qVhRcRkyeUjLzKQmM4v-e2eoC_Fu7ll8HDgfAGcYXZWYoGvCFC8oFfQATJASZSGlFId_8jGY5rxBw1FFuGIT8Dpb-RRiakxrPZy3pt7ldYYxwEVsO9928Nm05ss3Y3zb5c43GT7F2NTmEt6kfmtqaFoHP2Nyq-Rznp2Co2Dq7Ke__wR83N2-Lx6K5cv942K-LCzmkhbOKCsr7xwRpSEWUVzZMngnOGGVQxgzTywuOVNEWFQxJDlHNDAlLeMyMHoCzve92xS_e5873ayz9XVtWh_7rKXieNis8EDO_pGb2Kdh6gAJypQgnA_QxR6yKeacfNDbtG5M2mmM9GhXj3b1aJf-ALPkagc</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>873497266</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>"Performance Analysis of Content Management Systems Joomla, Drupal and WordPress"</title><source>EZB Electronic Journals Library</source><creator>Patel, Savan K ; Rathod, V R ; Prajapati, Jigna B</creator><creatorcontrib>Patel, Savan K ; Rathod, V R ; Prajapati, Jigna B</creatorcontrib><description>At Present there are lots of open source content management systems (CMS) available in the market. As open source CMS has its own advantages but out of so many only few like Joomla, Drupal, WordPress are popular in the market because of good functionality and support. It is the obvious question for everyone that, what are the basic reasons that only these CMS are mostly acceptable? Lots of surveys have been done to know which is the best and why? But still it is unanswered. By certain comparison on data we want to show that why mentioned CMS are best in their areas? We also want discover ranking for these three CMS that out of these which one is preferable in which condition. In this paper we are comparing above mentioned CMS by Goggle page rank, their documentation support, their popularity, installation survey and many more.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0975-8887</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 0975-8887</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.5120/2496-3373</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: Foundation of Computer Science</publisher><subject>Acceptability ; Documentation ; Freeware ; Management ; Management systems ; Markets ; Source code ; Surveys</subject><ispartof>International journal of computer applications, 2011-01, Vol.21 (4), p.39-43</ispartof><rights>Copyright Foundation of Computer Science 2011</rights><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1683-da9c8bedd275a2c031bc5fed7624bd0114e2c1564927c0b4086603f498c468f43</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27903,27904</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Patel, Savan K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rathod, V R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Prajapati, Jigna B</creatorcontrib><title>"Performance Analysis of Content Management Systems Joomla, Drupal and WordPress"</title><title>International journal of computer applications</title><description>At Present there are lots of open source content management systems (CMS) available in the market. As open source CMS has its own advantages but out of so many only few like Joomla, Drupal, WordPress are popular in the market because of good functionality and support. It is the obvious question for everyone that, what are the basic reasons that only these CMS are mostly acceptable? Lots of surveys have been done to know which is the best and why? But still it is unanswered. By certain comparison on data we want to show that why mentioned CMS are best in their areas? We also want discover ranking for these three CMS that out of these which one is preferable in which condition. In this paper we are comparing above mentioned CMS by Goggle page rank, their documentation support, their popularity, installation survey and many more.</description><subject>Acceptability</subject><subject>Documentation</subject><subject>Freeware</subject><subject>Management</subject><subject>Management systems</subject><subject>Markets</subject><subject>Source code</subject><subject>Surveys</subject><issn>0975-8887</issn><issn>0975-8887</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2011</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpdkEtLAzEUhYMoWLQL_0HoRgRH85o8lqW-qVhRcRkyeUjLzKQmM4v-e2eoC_Fu7ll8HDgfAGcYXZWYoGvCFC8oFfQATJASZSGlFId_8jGY5rxBw1FFuGIT8Dpb-RRiakxrPZy3pt7ldYYxwEVsO9928Nm05ss3Y3zb5c43GT7F2NTmEt6kfmtqaFoHP2Nyq-Rznp2Co2Dq7Ke__wR83N2-Lx6K5cv942K-LCzmkhbOKCsr7xwRpSEWUVzZMngnOGGVQxgzTywuOVNEWFQxJDlHNDAlLeMyMHoCzve92xS_e5873ayz9XVtWh_7rKXieNis8EDO_pGb2Kdh6gAJypQgnA_QxR6yKeacfNDbtG5M2mmM9GhXj3b1aJf-ALPkagc</recordid><startdate>20110101</startdate><enddate>20110101</enddate><creator>Patel, Savan K</creator><creator>Rathod, V R</creator><creator>Prajapati, Jigna B</creator><general>Foundation of Computer Science</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SC</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>L~C</scope><scope>L~D</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20110101</creationdate><title>"Performance Analysis of Content Management Systems Joomla, Drupal and WordPress"</title><author>Patel, Savan K ; Rathod, V R ; Prajapati, Jigna B</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1683-da9c8bedd275a2c031bc5fed7624bd0114e2c1564927c0b4086603f498c468f43</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2011</creationdate><topic>Acceptability</topic><topic>Documentation</topic><topic>Freeware</topic><topic>Management</topic><topic>Management systems</topic><topic>Markets</topic><topic>Source code</topic><topic>Surveys</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Patel, Savan K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rathod, V R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Prajapati, Jigna B</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Academic</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Professional</collection><jtitle>International journal of computer applications</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Patel, Savan K</au><au>Rathod, V R</au><au>Prajapati, Jigna B</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>"Performance Analysis of Content Management Systems Joomla, Drupal and WordPress"</atitle><jtitle>International journal of computer applications</jtitle><date>2011-01-01</date><risdate>2011</risdate><volume>21</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>39</spage><epage>43</epage><pages>39-43</pages><issn>0975-8887</issn><eissn>0975-8887</eissn><abstract>At Present there are lots of open source content management systems (CMS) available in the market. As open source CMS has its own advantages but out of so many only few like Joomla, Drupal, WordPress are popular in the market because of good functionality and support. It is the obvious question for everyone that, what are the basic reasons that only these CMS are mostly acceptable? Lots of surveys have been done to know which is the best and why? But still it is unanswered. By certain comparison on data we want to show that why mentioned CMS are best in their areas? We also want discover ranking for these three CMS that out of these which one is preferable in which condition. In this paper we are comparing above mentioned CMS by Goggle page rank, their documentation support, their popularity, installation survey and many more.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>Foundation of Computer Science</pub><doi>10.5120/2496-3373</doi><tpages>5</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0975-8887 |
| ispartof | International journal of computer applications, 2011-01, Vol.21 (4), p.39-43 |
| issn | 0975-8887 0975-8887 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_896188891 |
| source | EZB Electronic Journals Library |
| subjects | Acceptability Documentation Freeware Management Management systems Markets Source code Surveys |
| title | "Performance Analysis of Content Management Systems Joomla, Drupal and WordPress" |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-24T20%3A03%3A44IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=%22Performance%20Analysis%20of%20Content%20Management%20Systems%20Joomla,%20Drupal%20and%20WordPress%22&rft.jtitle=International%20journal%20of%20computer%20applications&rft.au=Patel,%20Savan%20K&rft.date=2011-01-01&rft.volume=21&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=39&rft.epage=43&rft.pages=39-43&rft.issn=0975-8887&rft.eissn=0975-8887&rft_id=info:doi/10.5120/2496-3373&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2382196531%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=873497266&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |