Quantitative benchmark computations of two-dimensional bubble dynamics
Benchmark configurations for quantitative validation and comparison of incompressible interfacial flow codes, which model two‐dimensional bubbles rising in liquid columns, are proposed. The benchmark quantities: circularity, center of mass, and mean rise velocity are defined and measured to monitor...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | International journal for numerical methods in fluids 2009-08, Vol.60 (11), p.1259-1288 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 1288 |
---|---|
container_issue | 11 |
container_start_page | 1259 |
container_title | International journal for numerical methods in fluids |
container_volume | 60 |
creator | Hysing, S. Turek, S. Kuzmin, D. Parolini, N. Burman, E. Ganesan, S. Tobiska, L. |
description | Benchmark configurations for quantitative validation and comparison of incompressible interfacial flow codes, which model two‐dimensional bubbles rising in liquid columns, are proposed. The benchmark quantities: circularity, center of mass, and mean rise velocity are defined and measured to monitor convergence toward a reference solution. Comprehensive studies are undertaken by three independent research groups, two representing Eulerian level set finite‐element codes and one representing an arbitrary Lagrangian–Eulerian moving grid approach.
The first benchmark test case considers a bubble with small density and viscosity ratios, which undergoes moderate shape deformation. The results from all codes agree very well allowing for target reference values to be established. For the second test case, a bubble with a very low density compared to that of the surrounding fluid, the results for all groups are in good agreement up to the point of break up, after which all three codes predict different bubble shapes. This highlights the need for the research community to invest more effort in obtaining reference solutions to problems involving break up and coalescence.
Other research groups are encouraged to participate in these benchmarks by contacting the authors and submitting their own data. The reference data for the computed benchmark quantities can also be supplied for validation purposes. Copyright © 2008 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1002/fld.1934 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_896186386</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1770278325</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4984-d24bea1796740584e1e5616b23feb88208f10e49772a8d93d73b37d492439f1c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kctKAzEUQIMoWKvgJ8xGdDM1r5kkS622CkUp9bULmUyC0XnUyYy1f29KB10pXLhwOZzFuQAcIzhCEOJzW-QjJAjdAQMEBYshSckuGEDMUIyhQPvgwPs3CKHAnAzAZN6pqnWtat2niTJT6ddSNe-Rrstlt7nWlY9qG7WrOs5daSofLqqIsi7LChPl60qVTvtDsGdV4c1Rv4fgcXL9ML6JZ_fT2_HFLNZUcBrnmGZGISZSRmHCqUEmSVGaYWJNxjmG3CJoqGAMK54LkjOSEZZTgSkRFmkyBKdb77KpPzrjW1k6r01RqMrUnZdcpIinJMwQnP1LIsZCE05w8ovqpva-MVYuGxcqrCWCchNVhqhyEzWgJ71Vea0K26hKO__D41CYMQIDF2-5lSvM-k-fnMyuem_PO9-arx8-fEKmjLBEPt9N5eXiBS_mcyKfyDdeaJNV</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1770278325</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Quantitative benchmark computations of two-dimensional bubble dynamics</title><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Hysing, S. ; Turek, S. ; Kuzmin, D. ; Parolini, N. ; Burman, E. ; Ganesan, S. ; Tobiska, L.</creator><creatorcontrib>Hysing, S. ; Turek, S. ; Kuzmin, D. ; Parolini, N. ; Burman, E. ; Ganesan, S. ; Tobiska, L.</creatorcontrib><description>Benchmark configurations for quantitative validation and comparison of incompressible interfacial flow codes, which model two‐dimensional bubbles rising in liquid columns, are proposed. The benchmark quantities: circularity, center of mass, and mean rise velocity are defined and measured to monitor convergence toward a reference solution. Comprehensive studies are undertaken by three independent research groups, two representing Eulerian level set finite‐element codes and one representing an arbitrary Lagrangian–Eulerian moving grid approach.
The first benchmark test case considers a bubble with small density and viscosity ratios, which undergoes moderate shape deformation. The results from all codes agree very well allowing for target reference values to be established. For the second test case, a bubble with a very low density compared to that of the surrounding fluid, the results for all groups are in good agreement up to the point of break up, after which all three codes predict different bubble shapes. This highlights the need for the research community to invest more effort in obtaining reference solutions to problems involving break up and coalescence.
Other research groups are encouraged to participate in these benchmarks by contacting the authors and submitting their own data. The reference data for the computed benchmark quantities can also be supplied for validation purposes. Copyright © 2008 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0271-2091</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1097-0363</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1097-0363</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/fld.1934</identifier><identifier>CODEN: IJNFDW</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd</publisher><subject>ALE ; Benchmarking ; Bubbles ; Computational fluid dynamics ; Computational methods in fluid dynamics ; Drops and bubbles ; Exact sciences and technology ; finite-element method ; Fluid dynamics ; Fluid flow ; Fundamental areas of phenomenology (including applications) ; level set method ; Mathematical models ; Monitors ; multiphase flow ; Nonhomogeneous flows ; Numerical analysis ; numerical simulation ; Physics ; rising bubble ; Two dimensional</subject><ispartof>International journal for numerical methods in fluids, 2009-08, Vol.60 (11), p.1259-1288</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2008 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.</rights><rights>2009 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4984-d24bea1796740584e1e5616b23feb88208f10e49772a8d93d73b37d492439f1c3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4984-d24bea1796740584e1e5616b23feb88208f10e49772a8d93d73b37d492439f1c3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Ffld.1934$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Ffld.1934$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27901,27902,45550,45551</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=22097730$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Hysing, S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Turek, S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kuzmin, D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Parolini, N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Burman, E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ganesan, S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tobiska, L.</creatorcontrib><title>Quantitative benchmark computations of two-dimensional bubble dynamics</title><title>International journal for numerical methods in fluids</title><addtitle>Int. J. Numer. Meth. Fluids</addtitle><description>Benchmark configurations for quantitative validation and comparison of incompressible interfacial flow codes, which model two‐dimensional bubbles rising in liquid columns, are proposed. The benchmark quantities: circularity, center of mass, and mean rise velocity are defined and measured to monitor convergence toward a reference solution. Comprehensive studies are undertaken by three independent research groups, two representing Eulerian level set finite‐element codes and one representing an arbitrary Lagrangian–Eulerian moving grid approach.
The first benchmark test case considers a bubble with small density and viscosity ratios, which undergoes moderate shape deformation. The results from all codes agree very well allowing for target reference values to be established. For the second test case, a bubble with a very low density compared to that of the surrounding fluid, the results for all groups are in good agreement up to the point of break up, after which all three codes predict different bubble shapes. This highlights the need for the research community to invest more effort in obtaining reference solutions to problems involving break up and coalescence.
Other research groups are encouraged to participate in these benchmarks by contacting the authors and submitting their own data. The reference data for the computed benchmark quantities can also be supplied for validation purposes. Copyright © 2008 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.</description><subject>ALE</subject><subject>Benchmarking</subject><subject>Bubbles</subject><subject>Computational fluid dynamics</subject><subject>Computational methods in fluid dynamics</subject><subject>Drops and bubbles</subject><subject>Exact sciences and technology</subject><subject>finite-element method</subject><subject>Fluid dynamics</subject><subject>Fluid flow</subject><subject>Fundamental areas of phenomenology (including applications)</subject><subject>level set method</subject><subject>Mathematical models</subject><subject>Monitors</subject><subject>multiphase flow</subject><subject>Nonhomogeneous flows</subject><subject>Numerical analysis</subject><subject>numerical simulation</subject><subject>Physics</subject><subject>rising bubble</subject><subject>Two dimensional</subject><issn>0271-2091</issn><issn>1097-0363</issn><issn>1097-0363</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2009</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kctKAzEUQIMoWKvgJ8xGdDM1r5kkS622CkUp9bULmUyC0XnUyYy1f29KB10pXLhwOZzFuQAcIzhCEOJzW-QjJAjdAQMEBYshSckuGEDMUIyhQPvgwPs3CKHAnAzAZN6pqnWtat2niTJT6ddSNe-Rrstlt7nWlY9qG7WrOs5daSofLqqIsi7LChPl60qVTvtDsGdV4c1Rv4fgcXL9ML6JZ_fT2_HFLNZUcBrnmGZGISZSRmHCqUEmSVGaYWJNxjmG3CJoqGAMK54LkjOSEZZTgSkRFmkyBKdb77KpPzrjW1k6r01RqMrUnZdcpIinJMwQnP1LIsZCE05w8ovqpva-MVYuGxcqrCWCchNVhqhyEzWgJ71Vea0K26hKO__D41CYMQIDF2-5lSvM-k-fnMyuem_PO9-arx8-fEKmjLBEPt9N5eXiBS_mcyKfyDdeaJNV</recordid><startdate>20090820</startdate><enddate>20090820</enddate><creator>Hysing, S.</creator><creator>Turek, S.</creator><creator>Kuzmin, D.</creator><creator>Parolini, N.</creator><creator>Burman, E.</creator><creator>Ganesan, S.</creator><creator>Tobiska, L.</creator><general>John Wiley & Sons, Ltd</general><general>Wiley</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SC</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>7U5</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>L~C</scope><scope>L~D</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20090820</creationdate><title>Quantitative benchmark computations of two-dimensional bubble dynamics</title><author>Hysing, S. ; Turek, S. ; Kuzmin, D. ; Parolini, N. ; Burman, E. ; Ganesan, S. ; Tobiska, L.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4984-d24bea1796740584e1e5616b23feb88208f10e49772a8d93d73b37d492439f1c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2009</creationdate><topic>ALE</topic><topic>Benchmarking</topic><topic>Bubbles</topic><topic>Computational fluid dynamics</topic><topic>Computational methods in fluid dynamics</topic><topic>Drops and bubbles</topic><topic>Exact sciences and technology</topic><topic>finite-element method</topic><topic>Fluid dynamics</topic><topic>Fluid flow</topic><topic>Fundamental areas of phenomenology (including applications)</topic><topic>level set method</topic><topic>Mathematical models</topic><topic>Monitors</topic><topic>multiphase flow</topic><topic>Nonhomogeneous flows</topic><topic>Numerical analysis</topic><topic>numerical simulation</topic><topic>Physics</topic><topic>rising bubble</topic><topic>Two dimensional</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Hysing, S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Turek, S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kuzmin, D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Parolini, N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Burman, E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ganesan, S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tobiska, L.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts</collection><collection>Mechanical & Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Solid State and Superconductivity Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Academic</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Professional</collection><jtitle>International journal for numerical methods in fluids</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Hysing, S.</au><au>Turek, S.</au><au>Kuzmin, D.</au><au>Parolini, N.</au><au>Burman, E.</au><au>Ganesan, S.</au><au>Tobiska, L.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Quantitative benchmark computations of two-dimensional bubble dynamics</atitle><jtitle>International journal for numerical methods in fluids</jtitle><addtitle>Int. J. Numer. Meth. Fluids</addtitle><date>2009-08-20</date><risdate>2009</risdate><volume>60</volume><issue>11</issue><spage>1259</spage><epage>1288</epage><pages>1259-1288</pages><issn>0271-2091</issn><issn>1097-0363</issn><eissn>1097-0363</eissn><coden>IJNFDW</coden><abstract>Benchmark configurations for quantitative validation and comparison of incompressible interfacial flow codes, which model two‐dimensional bubbles rising in liquid columns, are proposed. The benchmark quantities: circularity, center of mass, and mean rise velocity are defined and measured to monitor convergence toward a reference solution. Comprehensive studies are undertaken by three independent research groups, two representing Eulerian level set finite‐element codes and one representing an arbitrary Lagrangian–Eulerian moving grid approach.
The first benchmark test case considers a bubble with small density and viscosity ratios, which undergoes moderate shape deformation. The results from all codes agree very well allowing for target reference values to be established. For the second test case, a bubble with a very low density compared to that of the surrounding fluid, the results for all groups are in good agreement up to the point of break up, after which all three codes predict different bubble shapes. This highlights the need for the research community to invest more effort in obtaining reference solutions to problems involving break up and coalescence.
Other research groups are encouraged to participate in these benchmarks by contacting the authors and submitting their own data. The reference data for the computed benchmark quantities can also be supplied for validation purposes. Copyright © 2008 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.</abstract><cop>Chichester, UK</cop><pub>John Wiley & Sons, Ltd</pub><doi>10.1002/fld.1934</doi><tpages>30</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0271-2091 |
ispartof | International journal for numerical methods in fluids, 2009-08, Vol.60 (11), p.1259-1288 |
issn | 0271-2091 1097-0363 1097-0363 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_896186386 |
source | Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete |
subjects | ALE Benchmarking Bubbles Computational fluid dynamics Computational methods in fluid dynamics Drops and bubbles Exact sciences and technology finite-element method Fluid dynamics Fluid flow Fundamental areas of phenomenology (including applications) level set method Mathematical models Monitors multiphase flow Nonhomogeneous flows Numerical analysis numerical simulation Physics rising bubble Two dimensional |
title | Quantitative benchmark computations of two-dimensional bubble dynamics |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-21T20%3A02%3A14IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Quantitative%20benchmark%20computations%20of%20two-dimensional%20bubble%20dynamics&rft.jtitle=International%20journal%20for%20numerical%20methods%20in%20fluids&rft.au=Hysing,%20S.&rft.date=2009-08-20&rft.volume=60&rft.issue=11&rft.spage=1259&rft.epage=1288&rft.pages=1259-1288&rft.issn=0271-2091&rft.eissn=1097-0363&rft.coden=IJNFDW&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/fld.1934&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1770278325%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1770278325&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |