Children’s processing of reflexives and pronouns in English: Evidence from eye-movements during listening

► 6–9 year olds’ on-line anaphor resolution is not adult-like, despite perfect offline performance. ► Syntactic constraints and discourse information both influence on-line anaphor resolution early on. ► Primary school children are less able than adults to integrate different information sources dur...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of memory and language 2011-08, Vol.65 (2), p.128-144
Hauptverfasser: Clackson, Kaili, Felser, Claudia, Clahsen, Harald
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 144
container_issue 2
container_start_page 128
container_title Journal of memory and language
container_volume 65
creator Clackson, Kaili
Felser, Claudia
Clahsen, Harald
description ► 6–9 year olds’ on-line anaphor resolution is not adult-like, despite perfect offline performance. ► Syntactic constraints and discourse information both influence on-line anaphor resolution early on. ► Primary school children are less able than adults to integrate different information sources during anaphor resolution. This study examined how 6–9 year-old English-speaking children and adults establish anaphoric dependencies during auditory sentence comprehension. Using eye-movement monitoring during listening and a corresponding sentence–picture judgment task, we investigated both the ultimate interpretation and the online processing of reflexives in comparison to non-reflexive pronouns, focusing on how binding constraints interact with a competitor antecedent’s relative (discourse) prominence. Whilst our offline results show that the children’s ultimate interpretation for reflexives was constrained by binding principles in the same way as adults’, the eye-movement data revealed that during processing, children were temporarily more distracted than adults when multiple cues supported a prominent competitor antecedent. These results indicate that in addition to binding principles, children’s online referential decisions are also affected by discourse-level information. We suggest that the observed child/adult differences stem from children’s greater difficulty, compared to adults, in controlling multiple sources of information during sentence comprehension.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.jml.2011.04.007
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_896178507</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ericid>EJ928669</ericid><els_id>S0749596X11000465</els_id><sourcerecordid>896178507</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c407t-5702576c00a06cb08ce3ac040432af55ae445e0ff523e1f6d2c059757e2336563</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kM1u1DAUhS0EEkPLAyCxsJAQq6TXTmwnsEKjKT-qxAYkdpZxrluHxCl2Mmp3fY2-Hk-Cw4y6YMHKls53j44-Ql4wKBkwedaX_TiUHBgroS4B1COyYdDKAhrOHpMNqLotRCu_PyXPUuohg0LxDfm5vfJDFzH8vrtP9DpOFlPy4ZJOjkZ0A974PSZqQreGYVpCoj7QXbgcfLp6S3d732GwSF2cRoq3WIzTHkcMc6LdEtemDM4Y8u-UPHFmSPj8-J6Qb-e7r9uPxcWXD5-27y8KW4OaC6GACyUtgAFpf0BjsTIWaqgrbpwQButaIDgneIXMyY5bEK0SCnlVSSGrE_Lm0JsX_1owzXr0yeIwmIDTknTTSqYaASqTr_4h-2mJIY_TjWJVC1XLMsQOkI1TSlmKvo5-NPFWM9CrfN3rLF-v8jXUGv4Wvz4Wm2TN4KIJ1qeHQ15XIJtm5V4eOIzePsS7zy1vpGxz_O4YZ117j1En61fdnY9oZ91N_j8j_gAxRqQG</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>871390391</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Children’s processing of reflexives and pronouns in English: Evidence from eye-movements during listening</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete</source><creator>Clackson, Kaili ; Felser, Claudia ; Clahsen, Harald</creator><creatorcontrib>Clackson, Kaili ; Felser, Claudia ; Clahsen, Harald</creatorcontrib><description>► 6–9 year olds’ on-line anaphor resolution is not adult-like, despite perfect offline performance. ► Syntactic constraints and discourse information both influence on-line anaphor resolution early on. ► Primary school children are less able than adults to integrate different information sources during anaphor resolution. This study examined how 6–9 year-old English-speaking children and adults establish anaphoric dependencies during auditory sentence comprehension. Using eye-movement monitoring during listening and a corresponding sentence–picture judgment task, we investigated both the ultimate interpretation and the online processing of reflexives in comparison to non-reflexive pronouns, focusing on how binding constraints interact with a competitor antecedent’s relative (discourse) prominence. Whilst our offline results show that the children’s ultimate interpretation for reflexives was constrained by binding principles in the same way as adults’, the eye-movement data revealed that during processing, children were temporarily more distracted than adults when multiple cues supported a prominent competitor antecedent. These results indicate that in addition to binding principles, children’s online referential decisions are also affected by discourse-level information. We suggest that the observed child/adult differences stem from children’s greater difficulty, compared to adults, in controlling multiple sources of information during sentence comprehension.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0749-596X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1096-0821</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.jml.2011.04.007</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JMLAE6</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Amsterdam: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Adults ; Age Differences ; Anaphor resolution ; Auditory Stimuli ; Binding constraints ; Biological and medical sciences ; Child ; Child development ; Children ; Children’s sentence processing ; Cognition &amp; reasoning ; Cognitive Processes ; Cues ; Developmental psychology ; Difficulty Level ; Elementary School Students ; English ; English language ; Evidence ; Eye Movements ; Eye tracking during listening ; Form Classes (Languages) ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Grammar ; Information processing ; Information Sources ; Language Processing ; Listening Comprehension ; Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry ; Psychology. Psychophysiology ; Reading Comprehension ; Sentences ; Time Management</subject><ispartof>Journal of memory and language, 2011-08, Vol.65 (2), p.128-144</ispartof><rights>2011 Elsevier Inc.</rights><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright © 2011 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c407t-5702576c00a06cb08ce3ac040432af55ae445e0ff523e1f6d2c059757e2336563</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c407t-5702576c00a06cb08ce3ac040432af55ae445e0ff523e1f6d2c059757e2336563</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2011.04.007$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ928669$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=24306887$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Clackson, Kaili</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Felser, Claudia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Clahsen, Harald</creatorcontrib><title>Children’s processing of reflexives and pronouns in English: Evidence from eye-movements during listening</title><title>Journal of memory and language</title><description>► 6–9 year olds’ on-line anaphor resolution is not adult-like, despite perfect offline performance. ► Syntactic constraints and discourse information both influence on-line anaphor resolution early on. ► Primary school children are less able than adults to integrate different information sources during anaphor resolution. This study examined how 6–9 year-old English-speaking children and adults establish anaphoric dependencies during auditory sentence comprehension. Using eye-movement monitoring during listening and a corresponding sentence–picture judgment task, we investigated both the ultimate interpretation and the online processing of reflexives in comparison to non-reflexive pronouns, focusing on how binding constraints interact with a competitor antecedent’s relative (discourse) prominence. Whilst our offline results show that the children’s ultimate interpretation for reflexives was constrained by binding principles in the same way as adults’, the eye-movement data revealed that during processing, children were temporarily more distracted than adults when multiple cues supported a prominent competitor antecedent. These results indicate that in addition to binding principles, children’s online referential decisions are also affected by discourse-level information. We suggest that the observed child/adult differences stem from children’s greater difficulty, compared to adults, in controlling multiple sources of information during sentence comprehension.</description><subject>Adults</subject><subject>Age Differences</subject><subject>Anaphor resolution</subject><subject>Auditory Stimuli</subject><subject>Binding constraints</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Child</subject><subject>Child development</subject><subject>Children</subject><subject>Children’s sentence processing</subject><subject>Cognition &amp; reasoning</subject><subject>Cognitive Processes</subject><subject>Cues</subject><subject>Developmental psychology</subject><subject>Difficulty Level</subject><subject>Elementary School Students</subject><subject>English</subject><subject>English language</subject><subject>Evidence</subject><subject>Eye Movements</subject><subject>Eye tracking during listening</subject><subject>Form Classes (Languages)</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Grammar</subject><subject>Information processing</subject><subject>Information Sources</subject><subject>Language Processing</subject><subject>Listening Comprehension</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychophysiology</subject><subject>Reading Comprehension</subject><subject>Sentences</subject><subject>Time Management</subject><issn>0749-596X</issn><issn>1096-0821</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2011</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kM1u1DAUhS0EEkPLAyCxsJAQq6TXTmwnsEKjKT-qxAYkdpZxrluHxCl2Mmp3fY2-Hk-Cw4y6YMHKls53j44-Ql4wKBkwedaX_TiUHBgroS4B1COyYdDKAhrOHpMNqLotRCu_PyXPUuohg0LxDfm5vfJDFzH8vrtP9DpOFlPy4ZJOjkZ0A974PSZqQreGYVpCoj7QXbgcfLp6S3d732GwSF2cRoq3WIzTHkcMc6LdEtemDM4Y8u-UPHFmSPj8-J6Qb-e7r9uPxcWXD5-27y8KW4OaC6GACyUtgAFpf0BjsTIWaqgrbpwQButaIDgneIXMyY5bEK0SCnlVSSGrE_Lm0JsX_1owzXr0yeIwmIDTknTTSqYaASqTr_4h-2mJIY_TjWJVC1XLMsQOkI1TSlmKvo5-NPFWM9CrfN3rLF-v8jXUGv4Wvz4Wm2TN4KIJ1qeHQ15XIJtm5V4eOIzePsS7zy1vpGxz_O4YZ117j1En61fdnY9oZ91N_j8j_gAxRqQG</recordid><startdate>20110801</startdate><enddate>20110801</enddate><creator>Clackson, Kaili</creator><creator>Felser, Claudia</creator><creator>Clahsen, Harald</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><general>Elsevier</general><general>Elsevier BV</general><scope>7SW</scope><scope>BJH</scope><scope>BNH</scope><scope>BNI</scope><scope>BNJ</scope><scope>BNO</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>PET</scope><scope>REK</scope><scope>WWN</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7T9</scope><scope>8BM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20110801</creationdate><title>Children’s processing of reflexives and pronouns in English: Evidence from eye-movements during listening</title><author>Clackson, Kaili ; Felser, Claudia ; Clahsen, Harald</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c407t-5702576c00a06cb08ce3ac040432af55ae445e0ff523e1f6d2c059757e2336563</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2011</creationdate><topic>Adults</topic><topic>Age Differences</topic><topic>Anaphor resolution</topic><topic>Auditory Stimuli</topic><topic>Binding constraints</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Child</topic><topic>Child development</topic><topic>Children</topic><topic>Children’s sentence processing</topic><topic>Cognition &amp; reasoning</topic><topic>Cognitive Processes</topic><topic>Cues</topic><topic>Developmental psychology</topic><topic>Difficulty Level</topic><topic>Elementary School Students</topic><topic>English</topic><topic>English language</topic><topic>Evidence</topic><topic>Eye Movements</topic><topic>Eye tracking during listening</topic><topic>Form Classes (Languages)</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Grammar</topic><topic>Information processing</topic><topic>Information Sources</topic><topic>Language Processing</topic><topic>Listening Comprehension</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychophysiology</topic><topic>Reading Comprehension</topic><topic>Sentences</topic><topic>Time Management</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Clackson, Kaili</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Felser, Claudia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Clahsen, Harald</creatorcontrib><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Ovid)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>ERIC( SilverPlatter )</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC PlusText (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>Education Resources Information Center (ERIC)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Linguistics and Language Behavior Abstracts (LLBA)</collection><collection>ComDisDome</collection><jtitle>Journal of memory and language</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Clackson, Kaili</au><au>Felser, Claudia</au><au>Clahsen, Harald</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ928669</ericid><atitle>Children’s processing of reflexives and pronouns in English: Evidence from eye-movements during listening</atitle><jtitle>Journal of memory and language</jtitle><date>2011-08-01</date><risdate>2011</risdate><volume>65</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>128</spage><epage>144</epage><pages>128-144</pages><issn>0749-596X</issn><eissn>1096-0821</eissn><coden>JMLAE6</coden><abstract>► 6–9 year olds’ on-line anaphor resolution is not adult-like, despite perfect offline performance. ► Syntactic constraints and discourse information both influence on-line anaphor resolution early on. ► Primary school children are less able than adults to integrate different information sources during anaphor resolution. This study examined how 6–9 year-old English-speaking children and adults establish anaphoric dependencies during auditory sentence comprehension. Using eye-movement monitoring during listening and a corresponding sentence–picture judgment task, we investigated both the ultimate interpretation and the online processing of reflexives in comparison to non-reflexive pronouns, focusing on how binding constraints interact with a competitor antecedent’s relative (discourse) prominence. Whilst our offline results show that the children’s ultimate interpretation for reflexives was constrained by binding principles in the same way as adults’, the eye-movement data revealed that during processing, children were temporarily more distracted than adults when multiple cues supported a prominent competitor antecedent. These results indicate that in addition to binding principles, children’s online referential decisions are also affected by discourse-level information. We suggest that the observed child/adult differences stem from children’s greater difficulty, compared to adults, in controlling multiple sources of information during sentence comprehension.</abstract><cop>Amsterdam</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><doi>10.1016/j.jml.2011.04.007</doi><tpages>17</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0749-596X
ispartof Journal of memory and language, 2011-08, Vol.65 (2), p.128-144
issn 0749-596X
1096-0821
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_896178507
source Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete
subjects Adults
Age Differences
Anaphor resolution
Auditory Stimuli
Binding constraints
Biological and medical sciences
Child
Child development
Children
Children’s sentence processing
Cognition & reasoning
Cognitive Processes
Cues
Developmental psychology
Difficulty Level
Elementary School Students
English
English language
Evidence
Eye Movements
Eye tracking during listening
Form Classes (Languages)
Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology
Grammar
Information processing
Information Sources
Language Processing
Listening Comprehension
Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry
Psychology. Psychophysiology
Reading Comprehension
Sentences
Time Management
title Children’s processing of reflexives and pronouns in English: Evidence from eye-movements during listening
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-30T18%3A11%3A00IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Children%E2%80%99s%20processing%20of%20reflexives%20and%20pronouns%20in%20English:%20Evidence%20from%20eye-movements%20during%20listening&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20memory%20and%20language&rft.au=Clackson,%20Kaili&rft.date=2011-08-01&rft.volume=65&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=128&rft.epage=144&rft.pages=128-144&rft.issn=0749-596X&rft.eissn=1096-0821&rft.coden=JMLAE6&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.jml.2011.04.007&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E896178507%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=871390391&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ericid=EJ928669&rft_els_id=S0749596X11000465&rfr_iscdi=true