Children’s processing of reflexives and pronouns in English: Evidence from eye-movements during listening
► 6–9 year olds’ on-line anaphor resolution is not adult-like, despite perfect offline performance. ► Syntactic constraints and discourse information both influence on-line anaphor resolution early on. ► Primary school children are less able than adults to integrate different information sources dur...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of memory and language 2011-08, Vol.65 (2), p.128-144 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 144 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 128 |
container_title | Journal of memory and language |
container_volume | 65 |
creator | Clackson, Kaili Felser, Claudia Clahsen, Harald |
description | ► 6–9
year olds’ on-line anaphor resolution is not adult-like, despite perfect offline performance. ► Syntactic constraints and discourse information both influence on-line anaphor resolution early on. ► Primary school children are less able than adults to integrate different information sources during anaphor resolution.
This study examined how 6–9
year-old English-speaking children and adults establish anaphoric dependencies during auditory sentence comprehension. Using eye-movement monitoring during listening and a corresponding sentence–picture judgment task, we investigated both the ultimate interpretation and the online processing of reflexives in comparison to non-reflexive pronouns, focusing on how binding constraints interact with a competitor antecedent’s relative (discourse) prominence. Whilst our offline results show that the children’s ultimate interpretation for reflexives was constrained by binding principles in the same way as adults’, the eye-movement data revealed that during processing, children were temporarily more distracted than adults when multiple cues supported a prominent competitor antecedent. These results indicate that in addition to binding principles, children’s online referential decisions are also affected by discourse-level information. We suggest that the observed child/adult differences stem from children’s greater difficulty, compared to adults, in controlling multiple sources of information during sentence comprehension. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.jml.2011.04.007 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_896178507</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ericid>EJ928669</ericid><els_id>S0749596X11000465</els_id><sourcerecordid>896178507</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c407t-5702576c00a06cb08ce3ac040432af55ae445e0ff523e1f6d2c059757e2336563</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kM1u1DAUhS0EEkPLAyCxsJAQq6TXTmwnsEKjKT-qxAYkdpZxrluHxCl2Mmp3fY2-Hk-Cw4y6YMHKls53j44-Ql4wKBkwedaX_TiUHBgroS4B1COyYdDKAhrOHpMNqLotRCu_PyXPUuohg0LxDfm5vfJDFzH8vrtP9DpOFlPy4ZJOjkZ0A974PSZqQreGYVpCoj7QXbgcfLp6S3d732GwSF2cRoq3WIzTHkcMc6LdEtemDM4Y8u-UPHFmSPj8-J6Qb-e7r9uPxcWXD5-27y8KW4OaC6GACyUtgAFpf0BjsTIWaqgrbpwQButaIDgneIXMyY5bEK0SCnlVSSGrE_Lm0JsX_1owzXr0yeIwmIDTknTTSqYaASqTr_4h-2mJIY_TjWJVC1XLMsQOkI1TSlmKvo5-NPFWM9CrfN3rLF-v8jXUGv4Wvz4Wm2TN4KIJ1qeHQ15XIJtm5V4eOIzePsS7zy1vpGxz_O4YZ117j1En61fdnY9oZ91N_j8j_gAxRqQG</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>871390391</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Children’s processing of reflexives and pronouns in English: Evidence from eye-movements during listening</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete</source><creator>Clackson, Kaili ; Felser, Claudia ; Clahsen, Harald</creator><creatorcontrib>Clackson, Kaili ; Felser, Claudia ; Clahsen, Harald</creatorcontrib><description>► 6–9
year olds’ on-line anaphor resolution is not adult-like, despite perfect offline performance. ► Syntactic constraints and discourse information both influence on-line anaphor resolution early on. ► Primary school children are less able than adults to integrate different information sources during anaphor resolution.
This study examined how 6–9
year-old English-speaking children and adults establish anaphoric dependencies during auditory sentence comprehension. Using eye-movement monitoring during listening and a corresponding sentence–picture judgment task, we investigated both the ultimate interpretation and the online processing of reflexives in comparison to non-reflexive pronouns, focusing on how binding constraints interact with a competitor antecedent’s relative (discourse) prominence. Whilst our offline results show that the children’s ultimate interpretation for reflexives was constrained by binding principles in the same way as adults’, the eye-movement data revealed that during processing, children were temporarily more distracted than adults when multiple cues supported a prominent competitor antecedent. These results indicate that in addition to binding principles, children’s online referential decisions are also affected by discourse-level information. We suggest that the observed child/adult differences stem from children’s greater difficulty, compared to adults, in controlling multiple sources of information during sentence comprehension.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0749-596X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1096-0821</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.jml.2011.04.007</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JMLAE6</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Amsterdam: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Adults ; Age Differences ; Anaphor resolution ; Auditory Stimuli ; Binding constraints ; Biological and medical sciences ; Child ; Child development ; Children ; Children’s sentence processing ; Cognition & reasoning ; Cognitive Processes ; Cues ; Developmental psychology ; Difficulty Level ; Elementary School Students ; English ; English language ; Evidence ; Eye Movements ; Eye tracking during listening ; Form Classes (Languages) ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Grammar ; Information processing ; Information Sources ; Language Processing ; Listening Comprehension ; Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry ; Psychology. Psychophysiology ; Reading Comprehension ; Sentences ; Time Management</subject><ispartof>Journal of memory and language, 2011-08, Vol.65 (2), p.128-144</ispartof><rights>2011 Elsevier Inc.</rights><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright © 2011 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c407t-5702576c00a06cb08ce3ac040432af55ae445e0ff523e1f6d2c059757e2336563</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c407t-5702576c00a06cb08ce3ac040432af55ae445e0ff523e1f6d2c059757e2336563</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2011.04.007$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ928669$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=24306887$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Clackson, Kaili</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Felser, Claudia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Clahsen, Harald</creatorcontrib><title>Children’s processing of reflexives and pronouns in English: Evidence from eye-movements during listening</title><title>Journal of memory and language</title><description>► 6–9
year olds’ on-line anaphor resolution is not adult-like, despite perfect offline performance. ► Syntactic constraints and discourse information both influence on-line anaphor resolution early on. ► Primary school children are less able than adults to integrate different information sources during anaphor resolution.
This study examined how 6–9
year-old English-speaking children and adults establish anaphoric dependencies during auditory sentence comprehension. Using eye-movement monitoring during listening and a corresponding sentence–picture judgment task, we investigated both the ultimate interpretation and the online processing of reflexives in comparison to non-reflexive pronouns, focusing on how binding constraints interact with a competitor antecedent’s relative (discourse) prominence. Whilst our offline results show that the children’s ultimate interpretation for reflexives was constrained by binding principles in the same way as adults’, the eye-movement data revealed that during processing, children were temporarily more distracted than adults when multiple cues supported a prominent competitor antecedent. These results indicate that in addition to binding principles, children’s online referential decisions are also affected by discourse-level information. We suggest that the observed child/adult differences stem from children’s greater difficulty, compared to adults, in controlling multiple sources of information during sentence comprehension.</description><subject>Adults</subject><subject>Age Differences</subject><subject>Anaphor resolution</subject><subject>Auditory Stimuli</subject><subject>Binding constraints</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Child</subject><subject>Child development</subject><subject>Children</subject><subject>Children’s sentence processing</subject><subject>Cognition & reasoning</subject><subject>Cognitive Processes</subject><subject>Cues</subject><subject>Developmental psychology</subject><subject>Difficulty Level</subject><subject>Elementary School Students</subject><subject>English</subject><subject>English language</subject><subject>Evidence</subject><subject>Eye Movements</subject><subject>Eye tracking during listening</subject><subject>Form Classes (Languages)</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Grammar</subject><subject>Information processing</subject><subject>Information Sources</subject><subject>Language Processing</subject><subject>Listening Comprehension</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychophysiology</subject><subject>Reading Comprehension</subject><subject>Sentences</subject><subject>Time Management</subject><issn>0749-596X</issn><issn>1096-0821</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2011</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kM1u1DAUhS0EEkPLAyCxsJAQq6TXTmwnsEKjKT-qxAYkdpZxrluHxCl2Mmp3fY2-Hk-Cw4y6YMHKls53j44-Ql4wKBkwedaX_TiUHBgroS4B1COyYdDKAhrOHpMNqLotRCu_PyXPUuohg0LxDfm5vfJDFzH8vrtP9DpOFlPy4ZJOjkZ0A974PSZqQreGYVpCoj7QXbgcfLp6S3d732GwSF2cRoq3WIzTHkcMc6LdEtemDM4Y8u-UPHFmSPj8-J6Qb-e7r9uPxcWXD5-27y8KW4OaC6GACyUtgAFpf0BjsTIWaqgrbpwQButaIDgneIXMyY5bEK0SCnlVSSGrE_Lm0JsX_1owzXr0yeIwmIDTknTTSqYaASqTr_4h-2mJIY_TjWJVC1XLMsQOkI1TSlmKvo5-NPFWM9CrfN3rLF-v8jXUGv4Wvz4Wm2TN4KIJ1qeHQ15XIJtm5V4eOIzePsS7zy1vpGxz_O4YZ117j1En61fdnY9oZ91N_j8j_gAxRqQG</recordid><startdate>20110801</startdate><enddate>20110801</enddate><creator>Clackson, Kaili</creator><creator>Felser, Claudia</creator><creator>Clahsen, Harald</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><general>Elsevier</general><general>Elsevier BV</general><scope>7SW</scope><scope>BJH</scope><scope>BNH</scope><scope>BNI</scope><scope>BNJ</scope><scope>BNO</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>PET</scope><scope>REK</scope><scope>WWN</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7T9</scope><scope>8BM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20110801</creationdate><title>Children’s processing of reflexives and pronouns in English: Evidence from eye-movements during listening</title><author>Clackson, Kaili ; Felser, Claudia ; Clahsen, Harald</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c407t-5702576c00a06cb08ce3ac040432af55ae445e0ff523e1f6d2c059757e2336563</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2011</creationdate><topic>Adults</topic><topic>Age Differences</topic><topic>Anaphor resolution</topic><topic>Auditory Stimuli</topic><topic>Binding constraints</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Child</topic><topic>Child development</topic><topic>Children</topic><topic>Children’s sentence processing</topic><topic>Cognition & reasoning</topic><topic>Cognitive Processes</topic><topic>Cues</topic><topic>Developmental psychology</topic><topic>Difficulty Level</topic><topic>Elementary School Students</topic><topic>English</topic><topic>English language</topic><topic>Evidence</topic><topic>Eye Movements</topic><topic>Eye tracking during listening</topic><topic>Form Classes (Languages)</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Grammar</topic><topic>Information processing</topic><topic>Information Sources</topic><topic>Language Processing</topic><topic>Listening Comprehension</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychophysiology</topic><topic>Reading Comprehension</topic><topic>Sentences</topic><topic>Time Management</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Clackson, Kaili</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Felser, Claudia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Clahsen, Harald</creatorcontrib><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Ovid)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>ERIC( SilverPlatter )</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC PlusText (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>Education Resources Information Center (ERIC)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Linguistics and Language Behavior Abstracts (LLBA)</collection><collection>ComDisDome</collection><jtitle>Journal of memory and language</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Clackson, Kaili</au><au>Felser, Claudia</au><au>Clahsen, Harald</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ928669</ericid><atitle>Children’s processing of reflexives and pronouns in English: Evidence from eye-movements during listening</atitle><jtitle>Journal of memory and language</jtitle><date>2011-08-01</date><risdate>2011</risdate><volume>65</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>128</spage><epage>144</epage><pages>128-144</pages><issn>0749-596X</issn><eissn>1096-0821</eissn><coden>JMLAE6</coden><abstract>► 6–9
year olds’ on-line anaphor resolution is not adult-like, despite perfect offline performance. ► Syntactic constraints and discourse information both influence on-line anaphor resolution early on. ► Primary school children are less able than adults to integrate different information sources during anaphor resolution.
This study examined how 6–9
year-old English-speaking children and adults establish anaphoric dependencies during auditory sentence comprehension. Using eye-movement monitoring during listening and a corresponding sentence–picture judgment task, we investigated both the ultimate interpretation and the online processing of reflexives in comparison to non-reflexive pronouns, focusing on how binding constraints interact with a competitor antecedent’s relative (discourse) prominence. Whilst our offline results show that the children’s ultimate interpretation for reflexives was constrained by binding principles in the same way as adults’, the eye-movement data revealed that during processing, children were temporarily more distracted than adults when multiple cues supported a prominent competitor antecedent. These results indicate that in addition to binding principles, children’s online referential decisions are also affected by discourse-level information. We suggest that the observed child/adult differences stem from children’s greater difficulty, compared to adults, in controlling multiple sources of information during sentence comprehension.</abstract><cop>Amsterdam</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><doi>10.1016/j.jml.2011.04.007</doi><tpages>17</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0749-596X |
ispartof | Journal of memory and language, 2011-08, Vol.65 (2), p.128-144 |
issn | 0749-596X 1096-0821 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_896178507 |
source | Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete |
subjects | Adults Age Differences Anaphor resolution Auditory Stimuli Binding constraints Biological and medical sciences Child Child development Children Children’s sentence processing Cognition & reasoning Cognitive Processes Cues Developmental psychology Difficulty Level Elementary School Students English English language Evidence Eye Movements Eye tracking during listening Form Classes (Languages) Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology Grammar Information processing Information Sources Language Processing Listening Comprehension Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry Psychology. Psychophysiology Reading Comprehension Sentences Time Management |
title | Children’s processing of reflexives and pronouns in English: Evidence from eye-movements during listening |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-30T18%3A11%3A00IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Children%E2%80%99s%20processing%20of%20reflexives%20and%20pronouns%20in%20English:%20Evidence%20from%20eye-movements%20during%20listening&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20memory%20and%20language&rft.au=Clackson,%20Kaili&rft.date=2011-08-01&rft.volume=65&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=128&rft.epage=144&rft.pages=128-144&rft.issn=0749-596X&rft.eissn=1096-0821&rft.coden=JMLAE6&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.jml.2011.04.007&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E896178507%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=871390391&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ericid=EJ928669&rft_els_id=S0749596X11000465&rfr_iscdi=true |