Reading research on core values, Christian ethos and school transformation at England's most improved academy: a reply to Bragg, Allington, Simmons and Jones
This article presents the author's reply to the comments of Bragg, Allington, Simmons and Jones to his article "Transaction and transformation at Trinity" (Pike, 2010) wherein he reported a case study of Trinity Academy, which serves a former mining community and social priority area...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Oxford review of education 2011-08, Vol.37 (4), p.567-570 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 570 |
---|---|
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 567 |
container_title | Oxford review of education |
container_volume | 37 |
creator | Pike, Mark A. |
description | This article presents the author's reply to the comments of Bragg, Allington, Simmons and Jones to his article "Transaction and transformation at Trinity" (Pike, 2010) wherein he reported a case study of Trinity Academy, which serves a former mining community and social priority area near Doncaster in South Yorkshire. In 2008, just before the research commenced, Trinity was designated the "Most improved academy nationally". Educational attainment was significantly below the national average at the secondary school replaced by Trinity Academy where the average over the previous five years (2001-2005) was for just 28% of students to gain five or more GCSE passes at grade C or higher. Trinity opened in 2005 and the author reported that by 2009, 85% of students achieved five or more GCSE passes at grade C or better. More significantly, the proportion of students gaining five or more GCSE A-C grades "including English and mathematics" increased from 20% in 2006 to 55% in 2009. Such improvement is significant when one considers that the area is a "one-school-town" as far as secondary education is concerned and there is no test of any sort for admission. The author contends that this is important because it should not be those children whose parents can afford to live in the most affluent areas that get the best education. It is especially important that young people attending Trinity achieve such results because since the 1980s jobs have been scarce in the former mining community it serves which was ranked in the worst 10% nationally for unemployment and in the worst 4% in the country as regards educational attainment just before it opened. Health levels were within the worst 5% nationally and the area also had the fourth highest concentration of single-parent families nationally. With appalling social mobility in England it is vital that areas such as the one served by Trinity should provide high quality "free" schooling for young people. That is why the author is pleased to report that in 2010, 95% of students at Trinity gained five or more GCSE A-C grades with the proportion "including English and mathematics" having increased to 63% and to note that the latest Ofsted report describes students as making "exceptional progress" (Ofsted, 2011, p. 4). |
doi_str_mv | 10.1080/03054985.2011.604954 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_896019473</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ericid>EJ953384</ericid><jstor_id>23047916</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>23047916</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c382t-319387560aecad7719b665622a0fe0dc2c7c1776a9a383ba7dab2f46ddd291043</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kc1uEzEUhUcIJELhDYrkXTeZYI899pgNaqMUqCoh8bO2bmxP4spjB9stysPwrnUY6JKVF-ccn3vv1zTnBK8IHvA7THHP5NCvOkzIimMme_asWRDG-5ZK0j9vFidLe_K8bF7lfIcx5oLRRfP7qwXjwg4lmy0kvUcxIB2TRQ_g721eovU-uVwcBGTLPmYEwaCs9zF6VBKEPMY0QXE1BgVtws5Xw0VGU8wFuemQ4oM1CDQYOx3fI6hFB39EJaKrBLvdEl16X_tLDEv0zU1TDHPFTQw2v25ejOCzffP3PWt-XG--rz-1t18-fl5f3raaDl1pKZF0ED3HYGuPEERuOe951wEeLTa600ITIThIoAPdgjCw7UbGjTGdJJjRs-Zi_reO-7NuXdTksra-7mLjfVaD5JhIJmh1stmpU8w52VEdkpsgHRXB6gRD_YOhTjDUDKPGzueYTU4_RTY3sqd0OMlvZ_kul5ie9I5iJiThVf8w6y78OfevmLxRBY4-prFC0C4r-t8BHgEUzqVQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>896019473</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Reading research on core values, Christian ethos and school transformation at England's most improved academy: a reply to Bragg, Allington, Simmons and Jones</title><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><source>EBSCOhost Education Source</source><creator>Pike, Mark A.</creator><creatorcontrib>Pike, Mark A.</creatorcontrib><description>This article presents the author's reply to the comments of Bragg, Allington, Simmons and Jones to his article "Transaction and transformation at Trinity" (Pike, 2010) wherein he reported a case study of Trinity Academy, which serves a former mining community and social priority area near Doncaster in South Yorkshire. In 2008, just before the research commenced, Trinity was designated the "Most improved academy nationally". Educational attainment was significantly below the national average at the secondary school replaced by Trinity Academy where the average over the previous five years (2001-2005) was for just 28% of students to gain five or more GCSE passes at grade C or higher. Trinity opened in 2005 and the author reported that by 2009, 85% of students achieved five or more GCSE passes at grade C or better. More significantly, the proportion of students gaining five or more GCSE A-C grades "including English and mathematics" increased from 20% in 2006 to 55% in 2009. Such improvement is significant when one considers that the area is a "one-school-town" as far as secondary education is concerned and there is no test of any sort for admission. The author contends that this is important because it should not be those children whose parents can afford to live in the most affluent areas that get the best education. It is especially important that young people attending Trinity achieve such results because since the 1980s jobs have been scarce in the former mining community it serves which was ranked in the worst 10% nationally for unemployment and in the worst 4% in the country as regards educational attainment just before it opened. Health levels were within the worst 5% nationally and the area also had the fourth highest concentration of single-parent families nationally. With appalling social mobility in England it is vital that areas such as the one served by Trinity should provide high quality "free" schooling for young people. That is why the author is pleased to report that in 2010, 95% of students at Trinity gained five or more GCSE A-C grades with the proportion "including English and mathematics" having increased to 63% and to note that the latest Ofsted report describes students as making "exceptional progress" (Ofsted, 2011, p. 4).</description><identifier>ISSN: 0305-4985</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1465-3915</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1080/03054985.2011.604954</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Routledge</publisher><subject>Access to Education ; Allington, Daniel ; Bragg, Sara ; Case Studies ; Christianity ; Christians ; Disadvantaged ; Education ; Education systems ; Educational Attainment ; Educational Improvement ; Educational research ; England ; English ; Foreign Countries ; Grades (Scholastic) ; Health ; Jones, Ken ; Mathematics Achievement ; Mining ; One Parent Family ; Parents ; School Restructuring ; Schools ; Schools of education ; Secondary School Students ; Simmons, Katy ; Social Mobility ; Trinity ; United Kingdom ; Values ; Values education</subject><ispartof>Oxford review of education, 2011-08, Vol.37 (4), p.567-570</ispartof><rights>Copyright Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 2011</rights><rights>Copyright © 2011 Taylor & Francis</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c382t-319387560aecad7719b665622a0fe0dc2c7c1776a9a383ba7dab2f46ddd291043</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c382t-319387560aecad7719b665622a0fe0dc2c7c1776a9a383ba7dab2f46ddd291043</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/23047916$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/23047916$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,803,27924,27925,58017,58250</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ953384$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Pike, Mark A.</creatorcontrib><title>Reading research on core values, Christian ethos and school transformation at England's most improved academy: a reply to Bragg, Allington, Simmons and Jones</title><title>Oxford review of education</title><description>This article presents the author's reply to the comments of Bragg, Allington, Simmons and Jones to his article "Transaction and transformation at Trinity" (Pike, 2010) wherein he reported a case study of Trinity Academy, which serves a former mining community and social priority area near Doncaster in South Yorkshire. In 2008, just before the research commenced, Trinity was designated the "Most improved academy nationally". Educational attainment was significantly below the national average at the secondary school replaced by Trinity Academy where the average over the previous five years (2001-2005) was for just 28% of students to gain five or more GCSE passes at grade C or higher. Trinity opened in 2005 and the author reported that by 2009, 85% of students achieved five or more GCSE passes at grade C or better. More significantly, the proportion of students gaining five or more GCSE A-C grades "including English and mathematics" increased from 20% in 2006 to 55% in 2009. Such improvement is significant when one considers that the area is a "one-school-town" as far as secondary education is concerned and there is no test of any sort for admission. The author contends that this is important because it should not be those children whose parents can afford to live in the most affluent areas that get the best education. It is especially important that young people attending Trinity achieve such results because since the 1980s jobs have been scarce in the former mining community it serves which was ranked in the worst 10% nationally for unemployment and in the worst 4% in the country as regards educational attainment just before it opened. Health levels were within the worst 5% nationally and the area also had the fourth highest concentration of single-parent families nationally. With appalling social mobility in England it is vital that areas such as the one served by Trinity should provide high quality "free" schooling for young people. That is why the author is pleased to report that in 2010, 95% of students at Trinity gained five or more GCSE A-C grades with the proportion "including English and mathematics" having increased to 63% and to note that the latest Ofsted report describes students as making "exceptional progress" (Ofsted, 2011, p. 4).</description><subject>Access to Education</subject><subject>Allington, Daniel</subject><subject>Bragg, Sara</subject><subject>Case Studies</subject><subject>Christianity</subject><subject>Christians</subject><subject>Disadvantaged</subject><subject>Education</subject><subject>Education systems</subject><subject>Educational Attainment</subject><subject>Educational Improvement</subject><subject>Educational research</subject><subject>England</subject><subject>English</subject><subject>Foreign Countries</subject><subject>Grades (Scholastic)</subject><subject>Health</subject><subject>Jones, Ken</subject><subject>Mathematics Achievement</subject><subject>Mining</subject><subject>One Parent Family</subject><subject>Parents</subject><subject>School Restructuring</subject><subject>Schools</subject><subject>Schools of education</subject><subject>Secondary School Students</subject><subject>Simmons, Katy</subject><subject>Social Mobility</subject><subject>Trinity</subject><subject>United Kingdom</subject><subject>Values</subject><subject>Values education</subject><issn>0305-4985</issn><issn>1465-3915</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2011</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kc1uEzEUhUcIJELhDYrkXTeZYI899pgNaqMUqCoh8bO2bmxP4spjB9stysPwrnUY6JKVF-ccn3vv1zTnBK8IHvA7THHP5NCvOkzIimMme_asWRDG-5ZK0j9vFidLe_K8bF7lfIcx5oLRRfP7qwXjwg4lmy0kvUcxIB2TRQ_g721eovU-uVwcBGTLPmYEwaCs9zF6VBKEPMY0QXE1BgVtws5Xw0VGU8wFuemQ4oM1CDQYOx3fI6hFB39EJaKrBLvdEl16X_tLDEv0zU1TDHPFTQw2v25ejOCzffP3PWt-XG--rz-1t18-fl5f3raaDl1pKZF0ED3HYGuPEERuOe951wEeLTa600ITIThIoAPdgjCw7UbGjTGdJJjRs-Zi_reO-7NuXdTksra-7mLjfVaD5JhIJmh1stmpU8w52VEdkpsgHRXB6gRD_YOhTjDUDKPGzueYTU4_RTY3sqd0OMlvZ_kul5ie9I5iJiThVf8w6y78OfevmLxRBY4-prFC0C4r-t8BHgEUzqVQ</recordid><startdate>201108</startdate><enddate>201108</enddate><creator>Pike, Mark A.</creator><general>Routledge</general><general>Taylor & Francis</general><scope>7SW</scope><scope>BJH</scope><scope>BNH</scope><scope>BNI</scope><scope>BNJ</scope><scope>BNO</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>PET</scope><scope>REK</scope><scope>WWN</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201108</creationdate><title>Reading research on core values, Christian ethos and school transformation at England's most improved academy: a reply to Bragg, Allington, Simmons and Jones</title><author>Pike, Mark A.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c382t-319387560aecad7719b665622a0fe0dc2c7c1776a9a383ba7dab2f46ddd291043</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2011</creationdate><topic>Access to Education</topic><topic>Allington, Daniel</topic><topic>Bragg, Sara</topic><topic>Case Studies</topic><topic>Christianity</topic><topic>Christians</topic><topic>Disadvantaged</topic><topic>Education</topic><topic>Education systems</topic><topic>Educational Attainment</topic><topic>Educational Improvement</topic><topic>Educational research</topic><topic>England</topic><topic>English</topic><topic>Foreign Countries</topic><topic>Grades (Scholastic)</topic><topic>Health</topic><topic>Jones, Ken</topic><topic>Mathematics Achievement</topic><topic>Mining</topic><topic>One Parent Family</topic><topic>Parents</topic><topic>School Restructuring</topic><topic>Schools</topic><topic>Schools of education</topic><topic>Secondary School Students</topic><topic>Simmons, Katy</topic><topic>Social Mobility</topic><topic>Trinity</topic><topic>United Kingdom</topic><topic>Values</topic><topic>Values education</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Pike, Mark A.</creatorcontrib><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Ovid)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>ERIC( SilverPlatter )</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC PlusText (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>Education Resources Information Center (ERIC)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><jtitle>Oxford review of education</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Pike, Mark A.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ953384</ericid><atitle>Reading research on core values, Christian ethos and school transformation at England's most improved academy: a reply to Bragg, Allington, Simmons and Jones</atitle><jtitle>Oxford review of education</jtitle><date>2011-08</date><risdate>2011</risdate><volume>37</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>567</spage><epage>570</epage><pages>567-570</pages><issn>0305-4985</issn><eissn>1465-3915</eissn><abstract>This article presents the author's reply to the comments of Bragg, Allington, Simmons and Jones to his article "Transaction and transformation at Trinity" (Pike, 2010) wherein he reported a case study of Trinity Academy, which serves a former mining community and social priority area near Doncaster in South Yorkshire. In 2008, just before the research commenced, Trinity was designated the "Most improved academy nationally". Educational attainment was significantly below the national average at the secondary school replaced by Trinity Academy where the average over the previous five years (2001-2005) was for just 28% of students to gain five or more GCSE passes at grade C or higher. Trinity opened in 2005 and the author reported that by 2009, 85% of students achieved five or more GCSE passes at grade C or better. More significantly, the proportion of students gaining five or more GCSE A-C grades "including English and mathematics" increased from 20% in 2006 to 55% in 2009. Such improvement is significant when one considers that the area is a "one-school-town" as far as secondary education is concerned and there is no test of any sort for admission. The author contends that this is important because it should not be those children whose parents can afford to live in the most affluent areas that get the best education. It is especially important that young people attending Trinity achieve such results because since the 1980s jobs have been scarce in the former mining community it serves which was ranked in the worst 10% nationally for unemployment and in the worst 4% in the country as regards educational attainment just before it opened. Health levels were within the worst 5% nationally and the area also had the fourth highest concentration of single-parent families nationally. With appalling social mobility in England it is vital that areas such as the one served by Trinity should provide high quality "free" schooling for young people. That is why the author is pleased to report that in 2010, 95% of students at Trinity gained five or more GCSE A-C grades with the proportion "including English and mathematics" having increased to 63% and to note that the latest Ofsted report describes students as making "exceptional progress" (Ofsted, 2011, p. 4).</abstract><pub>Routledge</pub><doi>10.1080/03054985.2011.604954</doi><tpages>4</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0305-4985 |
ispartof | Oxford review of education, 2011-08, Vol.37 (4), p.567-570 |
issn | 0305-4985 1465-3915 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_896019473 |
source | Jstor Complete Legacy; EBSCOhost Education Source |
subjects | Access to Education Allington, Daniel Bragg, Sara Case Studies Christianity Christians Disadvantaged Education Education systems Educational Attainment Educational Improvement Educational research England English Foreign Countries Grades (Scholastic) Health Jones, Ken Mathematics Achievement Mining One Parent Family Parents School Restructuring Schools Schools of education Secondary School Students Simmons, Katy Social Mobility Trinity United Kingdom Values Values education |
title | Reading research on core values, Christian ethos and school transformation at England's most improved academy: a reply to Bragg, Allington, Simmons and Jones |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-25T04%3A21%3A30IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Reading%20research%20on%20core%20values,%20Christian%20ethos%20and%20school%20transformation%20at%20England's%20most%20improved%20academy:%20a%20reply%20to%20Bragg,%20Allington,%20Simmons%20and%20Jones&rft.jtitle=Oxford%20review%20of%20education&rft.au=Pike,%20Mark%20A.&rft.date=2011-08&rft.volume=37&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=567&rft.epage=570&rft.pages=567-570&rft.issn=0305-4985&rft.eissn=1465-3915&rft_id=info:doi/10.1080/03054985.2011.604954&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E23047916%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=896019473&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ericid=EJ953384&rft_jstor_id=23047916&rfr_iscdi=true |