18F-FET PET/CT in Advanced Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma: an Intra-individual Comparison with 18F-FDG PET/CT
Purpose To assess the diagnostic value of O -2-fluoro-18(F)-ethyl- l -tyrosine ( 18 F-FET) positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) for patients with advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma compared with 18F-fluoro-2-deoxy- d -glucose ( 18 F-FDG) PET/CT at initial staging and...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Molecular imaging and biology 2011-10, Vol.13 (5), p.1036-1042 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Purpose
To assess the diagnostic value of
O
-2-fluoro-18(F)-ethyl-
l
-tyrosine (
18
F-FET) positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) for patients with advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma compared with 18F-fluoro-2-deoxy-
d
-glucose (
18
F-FDG) PET/CT at initial staging and following radiochemotherapy.
Procedures
Thirteen patients were prospectively enrolled; each of them underwent an
18
F-FDG PET/CT and
18
F-FET PET/CT before treatment. Ten of those were scanned 10 weeks after treatment.
Results
Sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy for
18
F-FDG PET/CT (primary and lymph node metastases) at initial staging were 89%, 50%, and 81%. For
18
F-FET PET/CT the numbers were 70%, 90%, and 74%. Sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy for
18
F-FDG PET/CT at follow-up were 71%, 65%, and 67%. For
18
F-FET PET/CT the numbers were 29%, 100%, and 83%. Additionally,
18
F-FDG PET/CT detected a higher number of second malignancies or distant metastases.
Conclusions
18
F-FET is no substitute for
18
F-FDG. Although it is more specific, too many malignant lesions are missed due to its lower sensitivity. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1536-1632 1860-2002 |
DOI: | 10.1007/s11307-010-0419-5 |