Denver Peritoneovenous Shunts for the Management of Malignant Ascites: A Review of the Literature in the Post LeVeen Era
Most case series describing peritoneovenous (PV) shunts for malignant ascites include both LeVeen and Denver shunts. Conclusions based on these studies are no longer clinically relevant since the LeVeen shunt has been discontinued. The purpose of this study was to identify outcomes specific to Denve...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | The American surgeon 2011-08, Vol.77 (8), p.1070-1075 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 1075 |
---|---|
container_issue | 8 |
container_start_page | 1070 |
container_title | The American surgeon |
container_volume | 77 |
creator | WHITE, Michael A AGLE, Steven C PADIA, Reema K ZERVOS, Emmanuel E |
description | Most case series describing peritoneovenous (PV) shunts for malignant ascites include both LeVeen and Denver shunts. Conclusions based on these studies are no longer clinically relevant since the LeVeen shunt has been discontinued. The purpose of this study was to identify outcomes specific to Denver shunts to establish expected results in the modern era. Case series describing PV shunts for malignant ascites between 1980 and 2008 were identified through a keyword PUBMED search. Whenever possible, results attributable to Denver shunts were abstracted and analyzed. Nineteen series describing 341 patients undergoing 353 Denver PV shunts for malignant ascites were identified. The primary indications for PV shunts were unspecified or cancers of unknown origin (40%), ovarian cancer (16%), and pancreatic cancer (8%). Primary patency averaged 87 ± 57 days. Seventy-four per cent of patients died with functioning shunts. Complications occurred in 38% of patients including occlusion (24%) and disseminated intravascular coagulation (9%). Average survival of all patients was 3.0 ± 1.7 months and shunts provided effective palliation in 75.3%. One and a half per cent of 133 patients who had autopsies were reported to have hematologic dissemination. These results are not statistically different than overall results reported for both shunts combined or LeVeen shunts alone. Studies that report combined outcomes with Denver and LeVeen shunts for malignant ascites are neither negatively, nor positively influenced by one specific shunt. Expectations following PV shunting for malignant ascites do not have to be revised because LeVeen shunts are no longer available. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1177/000313481107700830 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_894813034</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2426587461</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c469t-939e8b0161758d9a127faeb1b91e02ce56cff7810582f75999725309a86ab3c33</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNplkVFPHCEUhUlTU1ftH-hDQ5oYn6bCAAP0baNWm6ypsdrXCYMXHTMLKzCr_vsydWuT9unmXL5zc7kHoQ-UfKZUykNCCKOMK0qJlIQoRt6gGRVCVFrV7C2aTUA1EdtoJ6X7Inkj6Du0XVPNuaibGXo6Br-GiC8g9jl4CGvwYUz4x93oc8IuRJzvAJ8bb25hCT7j4Ioa-ltvipgn22dIX_AcX8K6h8fpeTIsSjuaPEbAvf_duQgp4wX8BPD4JJo9tOXMkOD9pu6i668nV0dn1eL76bej-aKyvNG50kyD6ghtqBTqRhtaS2ego52mQGoLorHOSUWJULWTQmsta8GINqoxHbOM7aKDl7mrGB5GSLld9snCMJjy2TG1SpcDMsJ4IT_9Q96HMfqyXKsUa0QhSYHqF8jGkFIE165ivzTxuaWknVJp_0-lmD5uJo_dEm5eLX9iKMD-BjDJmsFF422f_nKc6YZzzn4B00uSqA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>883658940</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Denver Peritoneovenous Shunts for the Management of Malignant Ascites: A Review of the Literature in the Post LeVeen Era</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>SAGE Complete</source><creator>WHITE, Michael A ; AGLE, Steven C ; PADIA, Reema K ; ZERVOS, Emmanuel E</creator><creatorcontrib>WHITE, Michael A ; AGLE, Steven C ; PADIA, Reema K ; ZERVOS, Emmanuel E</creatorcontrib><description>Most case series describing peritoneovenous (PV) shunts for malignant ascites include both LeVeen and Denver shunts. Conclusions based on these studies are no longer clinically relevant since the LeVeen shunt has been discontinued. The purpose of this study was to identify outcomes specific to Denver shunts to establish expected results in the modern era. Case series describing PV shunts for malignant ascites between 1980 and 2008 were identified through a keyword PUBMED search. Whenever possible, results attributable to Denver shunts were abstracted and analyzed. Nineteen series describing 341 patients undergoing 353 Denver PV shunts for malignant ascites were identified. The primary indications for PV shunts were unspecified or cancers of unknown origin (40%), ovarian cancer (16%), and pancreatic cancer (8%). Primary patency averaged 87 ± 57 days. Seventy-four per cent of patients died with functioning shunts. Complications occurred in 38% of patients including occlusion (24%) and disseminated intravascular coagulation (9%). Average survival of all patients was 3.0 ± 1.7 months and shunts provided effective palliation in 75.3%. One and a half per cent of 133 patients who had autopsies were reported to have hematologic dissemination. These results are not statistically different than overall results reported for both shunts combined or LeVeen shunts alone. Studies that report combined outcomes with Denver and LeVeen shunts for malignant ascites are neither negatively, nor positively influenced by one specific shunt. Expectations following PV shunting for malignant ascites do not have to be revised because LeVeen shunts are no longer available.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0003-1348</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1555-9823</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/000313481107700830</identifier><identifier>PMID: 21944526</identifier><identifier>CODEN: AMSUAW</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Atlanta, GA: Southeastern Surgical Congress</publisher><subject>Ascites - etiology ; Ascites - mortality ; Ascites - pathology ; Ascites - surgery ; Biological and medical sciences ; Cancer ; Cancer therapies ; Cause of Death ; Female ; General aspects ; Hospitals ; Humans ; Literature reviews ; Male ; Medical sciences ; Mortality ; Neoplasms - complications ; Neoplasms - pathology ; Neoplasms - surgery ; Palliative Care - methods ; Peritoneovenous Shunt - methods ; Peritoneovenous Shunt - mortality ; Prognosis ; Risk Assessment ; Standard deviation ; Survival Analysis ; Time Factors</subject><ispartof>The American surgeon, 2011-08, Vol.77 (8), p.1070-1075</ispartof><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright Southeastern Surgical Congress Aug 2011</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c469t-939e8b0161758d9a127faeb1b91e02ce56cff7810582f75999725309a86ab3c33</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c469t-939e8b0161758d9a127faeb1b91e02ce56cff7810582f75999725309a86ab3c33</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=24396444$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21944526$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>WHITE, Michael A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>AGLE, Steven C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>PADIA, Reema K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>ZERVOS, Emmanuel E</creatorcontrib><title>Denver Peritoneovenous Shunts for the Management of Malignant Ascites: A Review of the Literature in the Post LeVeen Era</title><title>The American surgeon</title><addtitle>Am Surg</addtitle><description>Most case series describing peritoneovenous (PV) shunts for malignant ascites include both LeVeen and Denver shunts. Conclusions based on these studies are no longer clinically relevant since the LeVeen shunt has been discontinued. The purpose of this study was to identify outcomes specific to Denver shunts to establish expected results in the modern era. Case series describing PV shunts for malignant ascites between 1980 and 2008 were identified through a keyword PUBMED search. Whenever possible, results attributable to Denver shunts were abstracted and analyzed. Nineteen series describing 341 patients undergoing 353 Denver PV shunts for malignant ascites were identified. The primary indications for PV shunts were unspecified or cancers of unknown origin (40%), ovarian cancer (16%), and pancreatic cancer (8%). Primary patency averaged 87 ± 57 days. Seventy-four per cent of patients died with functioning shunts. Complications occurred in 38% of patients including occlusion (24%) and disseminated intravascular coagulation (9%). Average survival of all patients was 3.0 ± 1.7 months and shunts provided effective palliation in 75.3%. One and a half per cent of 133 patients who had autopsies were reported to have hematologic dissemination. These results are not statistically different than overall results reported for both shunts combined or LeVeen shunts alone. Studies that report combined outcomes with Denver and LeVeen shunts for malignant ascites are neither negatively, nor positively influenced by one specific shunt. Expectations following PV shunting for malignant ascites do not have to be revised because LeVeen shunts are no longer available.</description><subject>Ascites - etiology</subject><subject>Ascites - mortality</subject><subject>Ascites - pathology</subject><subject>Ascites - surgery</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Cancer</subject><subject>Cancer therapies</subject><subject>Cause of Death</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>General aspects</subject><subject>Hospitals</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Literature reviews</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Mortality</subject><subject>Neoplasms - complications</subject><subject>Neoplasms - pathology</subject><subject>Neoplasms - surgery</subject><subject>Palliative Care - methods</subject><subject>Peritoneovenous Shunt - methods</subject><subject>Peritoneovenous Shunt - mortality</subject><subject>Prognosis</subject><subject>Risk Assessment</subject><subject>Standard deviation</subject><subject>Survival Analysis</subject><subject>Time Factors</subject><issn>0003-1348</issn><issn>1555-9823</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2011</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNplkVFPHCEUhUlTU1ftH-hDQ5oYn6bCAAP0baNWm6ypsdrXCYMXHTMLKzCr_vsydWuT9unmXL5zc7kHoQ-UfKZUykNCCKOMK0qJlIQoRt6gGRVCVFrV7C2aTUA1EdtoJ6X7Inkj6Du0XVPNuaibGXo6Br-GiC8g9jl4CGvwYUz4x93oc8IuRJzvAJ8bb25hCT7j4Ioa-ltvipgn22dIX_AcX8K6h8fpeTIsSjuaPEbAvf_duQgp4wX8BPD4JJo9tOXMkOD9pu6i668nV0dn1eL76bej-aKyvNG50kyD6ghtqBTqRhtaS2ego52mQGoLorHOSUWJULWTQmsta8GINqoxHbOM7aKDl7mrGB5GSLld9snCMJjy2TG1SpcDMsJ4IT_9Q96HMfqyXKsUa0QhSYHqF8jGkFIE165ivzTxuaWknVJp_0-lmD5uJo_dEm5eLX9iKMD-BjDJmsFF422f_nKc6YZzzn4B00uSqA</recordid><startdate>20110801</startdate><enddate>20110801</enddate><creator>WHITE, Michael A</creator><creator>AGLE, Steven C</creator><creator>PADIA, Reema K</creator><creator>ZERVOS, Emmanuel E</creator><general>Southeastern Surgical Congress</general><general>SAGE PUBLICATIONS, INC</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>4T-</scope><scope>4U-</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8AF</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9-</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0R</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20110801</creationdate><title>Denver Peritoneovenous Shunts for the Management of Malignant Ascites: A Review of the Literature in the Post LeVeen Era</title><author>WHITE, Michael A ; AGLE, Steven C ; PADIA, Reema K ; ZERVOS, Emmanuel E</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c469t-939e8b0161758d9a127faeb1b91e02ce56cff7810582f75999725309a86ab3c33</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2011</creationdate><topic>Ascites - etiology</topic><topic>Ascites - mortality</topic><topic>Ascites - pathology</topic><topic>Ascites - surgery</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Cancer</topic><topic>Cancer therapies</topic><topic>Cause of Death</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>General aspects</topic><topic>Hospitals</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Literature reviews</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Mortality</topic><topic>Neoplasms - complications</topic><topic>Neoplasms - pathology</topic><topic>Neoplasms - surgery</topic><topic>Palliative Care - methods</topic><topic>Peritoneovenous Shunt - methods</topic><topic>Peritoneovenous Shunt - mortality</topic><topic>Prognosis</topic><topic>Risk Assessment</topic><topic>Standard deviation</topic><topic>Survival Analysis</topic><topic>Time Factors</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>WHITE, Michael A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>AGLE, Steven C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>PADIA, Reema K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>ZERVOS, Emmanuel E</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Docstoc</collection><collection>University Readers</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>STEM Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Consumer Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Consumer Health Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>The American surgeon</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>WHITE, Michael A</au><au>AGLE, Steven C</au><au>PADIA, Reema K</au><au>ZERVOS, Emmanuel E</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Denver Peritoneovenous Shunts for the Management of Malignant Ascites: A Review of the Literature in the Post LeVeen Era</atitle><jtitle>The American surgeon</jtitle><addtitle>Am Surg</addtitle><date>2011-08-01</date><risdate>2011</risdate><volume>77</volume><issue>8</issue><spage>1070</spage><epage>1075</epage><pages>1070-1075</pages><issn>0003-1348</issn><eissn>1555-9823</eissn><coden>AMSUAW</coden><abstract>Most case series describing peritoneovenous (PV) shunts for malignant ascites include both LeVeen and Denver shunts. Conclusions based on these studies are no longer clinically relevant since the LeVeen shunt has been discontinued. The purpose of this study was to identify outcomes specific to Denver shunts to establish expected results in the modern era. Case series describing PV shunts for malignant ascites between 1980 and 2008 were identified through a keyword PUBMED search. Whenever possible, results attributable to Denver shunts were abstracted and analyzed. Nineteen series describing 341 patients undergoing 353 Denver PV shunts for malignant ascites were identified. The primary indications for PV shunts were unspecified or cancers of unknown origin (40%), ovarian cancer (16%), and pancreatic cancer (8%). Primary patency averaged 87 ± 57 days. Seventy-four per cent of patients died with functioning shunts. Complications occurred in 38% of patients including occlusion (24%) and disseminated intravascular coagulation (9%). Average survival of all patients was 3.0 ± 1.7 months and shunts provided effective palliation in 75.3%. One and a half per cent of 133 patients who had autopsies were reported to have hematologic dissemination. These results are not statistically different than overall results reported for both shunts combined or LeVeen shunts alone. Studies that report combined outcomes with Denver and LeVeen shunts for malignant ascites are neither negatively, nor positively influenced by one specific shunt. Expectations following PV shunting for malignant ascites do not have to be revised because LeVeen shunts are no longer available.</abstract><cop>Atlanta, GA</cop><pub>Southeastern Surgical Congress</pub><pmid>21944526</pmid><doi>10.1177/000313481107700830</doi><tpages>6</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0003-1348 |
ispartof | The American surgeon, 2011-08, Vol.77 (8), p.1070-1075 |
issn | 0003-1348 1555-9823 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_894813034 |
source | MEDLINE; SAGE Complete |
subjects | Ascites - etiology Ascites - mortality Ascites - pathology Ascites - surgery Biological and medical sciences Cancer Cancer therapies Cause of Death Female General aspects Hospitals Humans Literature reviews Male Medical sciences Mortality Neoplasms - complications Neoplasms - pathology Neoplasms - surgery Palliative Care - methods Peritoneovenous Shunt - methods Peritoneovenous Shunt - mortality Prognosis Risk Assessment Standard deviation Survival Analysis Time Factors |
title | Denver Peritoneovenous Shunts for the Management of Malignant Ascites: A Review of the Literature in the Post LeVeen Era |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-07T20%3A18%3A24IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Denver%20Peritoneovenous%20Shunts%20for%20the%20Management%20of%20Malignant%20Ascites:%20A%20Review%20of%20the%20Literature%20in%20the%20Post%20LeVeen%20Era&rft.jtitle=The%20American%20surgeon&rft.au=WHITE,%20Michael%20A&rft.date=2011-08-01&rft.volume=77&rft.issue=8&rft.spage=1070&rft.epage=1075&rft.pages=1070-1075&rft.issn=0003-1348&rft.eissn=1555-9823&rft.coden=AMSUAW&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/000313481107700830&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2426587461%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=883658940&rft_id=info:pmid/21944526&rfr_iscdi=true |