Fibroids in infertility - consensus statement from ACCEPT (Australasian CREI Consensus Expert Panel on Trial evidence)

Fibroid management is surrounded by considerable controversy and uncertainty. This paper summarises the consensus developed by a group of Australasian subspecialists in reproductive endocrinology and infertility (the ACCEPT group) on the evidence concerning the impact and management of fibroids in i...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Australian & New Zealand journal of obstetrics & gynaecology 2011-08, Vol.51 (4), p.289-295
Hauptverfasser: KROON, Ben, JOHNSON, Neil, CHAPMAN, Michael, YAZDANI, Anusch, HART, Roger
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 295
container_issue 4
container_start_page 289
container_title Australian & New Zealand journal of obstetrics & gynaecology
container_volume 51
creator KROON, Ben
JOHNSON, Neil
CHAPMAN, Michael
YAZDANI, Anusch
HART, Roger
description Fibroid management is surrounded by considerable controversy and uncertainty. This paper summarises the consensus developed by a group of Australasian subspecialists in reproductive endocrinology and infertility (the ACCEPT group) on the evidence concerning the impact and management of fibroids in infertility. The location of a fibroid within the uterus influences its effect on fertility. Subserosal fibroids do not appear to impact on fertility outcomes. Intramural (IM) fibroids may be associated with reduced fertility and an increased miscarriage rate (MR); however, there is insufficient evidence to inform whether myomectomy for IM fibroids improves fertility outcomes. Submucosal fibroids are associated with reduced fertility and an increased MR, and myomectomy for submucosal fibroids appears likely to improve fertility outcomes. The relative effect of multiple or different sized fibroids on fertility outcomes is uncertain, as is the relative usefulness of myomectomy in these situations. It is recommended that fibroids with suspected cavity involvement are defined by magnetic resonance imaging, sonohysterography or hysteroscopy because modalities such as transvaginal ultrasound and hysterosalpingography lack appropriate sensitivity and specificity. Medical management of fibroids delays efforts to conceive and is not recommended for the management of infertility associated with fibroids. Newer treatments such as uterine artery embolisation, radiofrequency ablation, bilateral uterine artery ligation, magnetic resonance‐guided focussed ultrasound surgery and fibroid myolysis require further investigation prior to their establishment in the routine management of fibroid‐associated infertility.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/j.1479-828X.2011.01300.x
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_894624129</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>894624129</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3570-70dafe3d07139e2c1c78ea80ac770fbd551422fb88d8fe020d771d3a35b87ec03</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo9UU2P0zAQtRCILQt_AfkGHBLGdhI7Bw5VaJddFbZCRXCznHgiueSjaydL--9J6NLRSDPSvDeaeY8QyiBmU3zcxyyReaS4-hVzYCwGJgDi4zOyuAyekwUAJJHKsuyKvAphD8DylCUvyRVnCrI0yxbkce1K3zsbqOumrNEPrnHDiUa06ruAXRgDDYMZsMVuoLXvW7ositV2R98vxzB405jgTEeL76tbWlwoq-NhWkW3psOG9h3deWcaio_OYlfhh9fkRW2agG-e6jX5sV7tii_R5v7mtlhuokqkEiIJ1tQoLEgmcuQVq6RCo8BUUkJd2nR6h_O6VMqqGoGDlZJZYURaKokViGvy7rz34PuHEcOgWxcqbJrprn4MWuVJxhPG8wn59gk5li1affCuNf6k_0s1AT6dAX9cg6fLnIGeLdF7PSuvZ-X1bIn-Z4k-6uXd_dxN_OjMd2HA44Vv_G-dSSFT_fPbjd7ebT6v17tCfxV_ARrKjtA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>894624129</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Fibroids in infertility - consensus statement from ACCEPT (Australasian CREI Consensus Expert Panel on Trial evidence)</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>KROON, Ben ; JOHNSON, Neil ; CHAPMAN, Michael ; YAZDANI, Anusch ; HART, Roger</creator><creatorcontrib>KROON, Ben ; JOHNSON, Neil ; CHAPMAN, Michael ; YAZDANI, Anusch ; HART, Roger ; Australasian CREI Consensus Expert Panel on Trial evidence (ACCEPT) group</creatorcontrib><description>Fibroid management is surrounded by considerable controversy and uncertainty. This paper summarises the consensus developed by a group of Australasian subspecialists in reproductive endocrinology and infertility (the ACCEPT group) on the evidence concerning the impact and management of fibroids in infertility. The location of a fibroid within the uterus influences its effect on fertility. Subserosal fibroids do not appear to impact on fertility outcomes. Intramural (IM) fibroids may be associated with reduced fertility and an increased miscarriage rate (MR); however, there is insufficient evidence to inform whether myomectomy for IM fibroids improves fertility outcomes. Submucosal fibroids are associated with reduced fertility and an increased MR, and myomectomy for submucosal fibroids appears likely to improve fertility outcomes. The relative effect of multiple or different sized fibroids on fertility outcomes is uncertain, as is the relative usefulness of myomectomy in these situations. It is recommended that fibroids with suspected cavity involvement are defined by magnetic resonance imaging, sonohysterography or hysteroscopy because modalities such as transvaginal ultrasound and hysterosalpingography lack appropriate sensitivity and specificity. Medical management of fibroids delays efforts to conceive and is not recommended for the management of infertility associated with fibroids. Newer treatments such as uterine artery embolisation, radiofrequency ablation, bilateral uterine artery ligation, magnetic resonance‐guided focussed ultrasound surgery and fibroid myolysis require further investigation prior to their establishment in the routine management of fibroid‐associated infertility.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0004-8666</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1479-828X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/j.1479-828X.2011.01300.x</identifier><identifier>PMID: 21806566</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>assisted reproductive technology ; Female ; fibroids ; Humans ; infertility ; Infertility, Female - etiology ; leiomyoma ; Leiomyoma - complications ; Leiomyoma - therapy ; myomectomy ; Reproductive Medicine ; Risk Factors ; Uterine Neoplasms - complications ; Uterine Neoplasms - therapy</subject><ispartof>Australian &amp; New Zealand journal of obstetrics &amp; gynaecology, 2011-08, Vol.51 (4), p.289-295</ispartof><rights>2011 The Authors. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology © 2011 The Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists</rights><rights>2011 The Authors. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology © 2011 The Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3570-70dafe3d07139e2c1c78ea80ac770fbd551422fb88d8fe020d771d3a35b87ec03</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fj.1479-828X.2011.01300.x$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fj.1479-828X.2011.01300.x$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>309,310,314,776,780,785,786,1411,23909,23910,25118,27901,27902,45550,45551</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21806566$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>KROON, Ben</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>JOHNSON, Neil</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>CHAPMAN, Michael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>YAZDANI, Anusch</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>HART, Roger</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Australasian CREI Consensus Expert Panel on Trial evidence (ACCEPT) group</creatorcontrib><title>Fibroids in infertility - consensus statement from ACCEPT (Australasian CREI Consensus Expert Panel on Trial evidence)</title><title>Australian &amp; New Zealand journal of obstetrics &amp; gynaecology</title><addtitle>Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol</addtitle><description>Fibroid management is surrounded by considerable controversy and uncertainty. This paper summarises the consensus developed by a group of Australasian subspecialists in reproductive endocrinology and infertility (the ACCEPT group) on the evidence concerning the impact and management of fibroids in infertility. The location of a fibroid within the uterus influences its effect on fertility. Subserosal fibroids do not appear to impact on fertility outcomes. Intramural (IM) fibroids may be associated with reduced fertility and an increased miscarriage rate (MR); however, there is insufficient evidence to inform whether myomectomy for IM fibroids improves fertility outcomes. Submucosal fibroids are associated with reduced fertility and an increased MR, and myomectomy for submucosal fibroids appears likely to improve fertility outcomes. The relative effect of multiple or different sized fibroids on fertility outcomes is uncertain, as is the relative usefulness of myomectomy in these situations. It is recommended that fibroids with suspected cavity involvement are defined by magnetic resonance imaging, sonohysterography or hysteroscopy because modalities such as transvaginal ultrasound and hysterosalpingography lack appropriate sensitivity and specificity. Medical management of fibroids delays efforts to conceive and is not recommended for the management of infertility associated with fibroids. Newer treatments such as uterine artery embolisation, radiofrequency ablation, bilateral uterine artery ligation, magnetic resonance‐guided focussed ultrasound surgery and fibroid myolysis require further investigation prior to their establishment in the routine management of fibroid‐associated infertility.</description><subject>assisted reproductive technology</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>fibroids</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>infertility</subject><subject>Infertility, Female - etiology</subject><subject>leiomyoma</subject><subject>Leiomyoma - complications</subject><subject>Leiomyoma - therapy</subject><subject>myomectomy</subject><subject>Reproductive Medicine</subject><subject>Risk Factors</subject><subject>Uterine Neoplasms - complications</subject><subject>Uterine Neoplasms - therapy</subject><issn>0004-8666</issn><issn>1479-828X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2011</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNo9UU2P0zAQtRCILQt_AfkGHBLGdhI7Bw5VaJddFbZCRXCznHgiueSjaydL--9J6NLRSDPSvDeaeY8QyiBmU3zcxyyReaS4-hVzYCwGJgDi4zOyuAyekwUAJJHKsuyKvAphD8DylCUvyRVnCrI0yxbkce1K3zsbqOumrNEPrnHDiUa06ruAXRgDDYMZsMVuoLXvW7ositV2R98vxzB405jgTEeL76tbWlwoq-NhWkW3psOG9h3deWcaio_OYlfhh9fkRW2agG-e6jX5sV7tii_R5v7mtlhuokqkEiIJ1tQoLEgmcuQVq6RCo8BUUkJd2nR6h_O6VMqqGoGDlZJZYURaKokViGvy7rz34PuHEcOgWxcqbJrprn4MWuVJxhPG8wn59gk5li1affCuNf6k_0s1AT6dAX9cg6fLnIGeLdF7PSuvZ-X1bIn-Z4k-6uXd_dxN_OjMd2HA44Vv_G-dSSFT_fPbjd7ebT6v17tCfxV_ARrKjtA</recordid><startdate>201108</startdate><enddate>201108</enddate><creator>KROON, Ben</creator><creator>JOHNSON, Neil</creator><creator>CHAPMAN, Michael</creator><creator>YAZDANI, Anusch</creator><creator>HART, Roger</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201108</creationdate><title>Fibroids in infertility - consensus statement from ACCEPT (Australasian CREI Consensus Expert Panel on Trial evidence)</title><author>KROON, Ben ; JOHNSON, Neil ; CHAPMAN, Michael ; YAZDANI, Anusch ; HART, Roger</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3570-70dafe3d07139e2c1c78ea80ac770fbd551422fb88d8fe020d771d3a35b87ec03</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2011</creationdate><topic>assisted reproductive technology</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>fibroids</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>infertility</topic><topic>Infertility, Female - etiology</topic><topic>leiomyoma</topic><topic>Leiomyoma - complications</topic><topic>Leiomyoma - therapy</topic><topic>myomectomy</topic><topic>Reproductive Medicine</topic><topic>Risk Factors</topic><topic>Uterine Neoplasms - complications</topic><topic>Uterine Neoplasms - therapy</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>KROON, Ben</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>JOHNSON, Neil</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>CHAPMAN, Michael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>YAZDANI, Anusch</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>HART, Roger</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Australasian CREI Consensus Expert Panel on Trial evidence (ACCEPT) group</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Australian &amp; New Zealand journal of obstetrics &amp; gynaecology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>KROON, Ben</au><au>JOHNSON, Neil</au><au>CHAPMAN, Michael</au><au>YAZDANI, Anusch</au><au>HART, Roger</au><aucorp>Australasian CREI Consensus Expert Panel on Trial evidence (ACCEPT) group</aucorp><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Fibroids in infertility - consensus statement from ACCEPT (Australasian CREI Consensus Expert Panel on Trial evidence)</atitle><jtitle>Australian &amp; New Zealand journal of obstetrics &amp; gynaecology</jtitle><addtitle>Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol</addtitle><date>2011-08</date><risdate>2011</risdate><volume>51</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>289</spage><epage>295</epage><pages>289-295</pages><issn>0004-8666</issn><eissn>1479-828X</eissn><abstract>Fibroid management is surrounded by considerable controversy and uncertainty. This paper summarises the consensus developed by a group of Australasian subspecialists in reproductive endocrinology and infertility (the ACCEPT group) on the evidence concerning the impact and management of fibroids in infertility. The location of a fibroid within the uterus influences its effect on fertility. Subserosal fibroids do not appear to impact on fertility outcomes. Intramural (IM) fibroids may be associated with reduced fertility and an increased miscarriage rate (MR); however, there is insufficient evidence to inform whether myomectomy for IM fibroids improves fertility outcomes. Submucosal fibroids are associated with reduced fertility and an increased MR, and myomectomy for submucosal fibroids appears likely to improve fertility outcomes. The relative effect of multiple or different sized fibroids on fertility outcomes is uncertain, as is the relative usefulness of myomectomy in these situations. It is recommended that fibroids with suspected cavity involvement are defined by magnetic resonance imaging, sonohysterography or hysteroscopy because modalities such as transvaginal ultrasound and hysterosalpingography lack appropriate sensitivity and specificity. Medical management of fibroids delays efforts to conceive and is not recommended for the management of infertility associated with fibroids. Newer treatments such as uterine artery embolisation, radiofrequency ablation, bilateral uterine artery ligation, magnetic resonance‐guided focussed ultrasound surgery and fibroid myolysis require further investigation prior to their establishment in the routine management of fibroid‐associated infertility.</abstract><cop>Oxford, UK</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><pmid>21806566</pmid><doi>10.1111/j.1479-828X.2011.01300.x</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0004-8666
ispartof Australian & New Zealand journal of obstetrics & gynaecology, 2011-08, Vol.51 (4), p.289-295
issn 0004-8666
1479-828X
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_894624129
source MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete
subjects assisted reproductive technology
Female
fibroids
Humans
infertility
Infertility, Female - etiology
leiomyoma
Leiomyoma - complications
Leiomyoma - therapy
myomectomy
Reproductive Medicine
Risk Factors
Uterine Neoplasms - complications
Uterine Neoplasms - therapy
title Fibroids in infertility - consensus statement from ACCEPT (Australasian CREI Consensus Expert Panel on Trial evidence)
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-18T08%3A35%3A10IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Fibroids%20in%20infertility%20-%20consensus%20statement%20from%20ACCEPT%20(Australasian%20CREI%20Consensus%20Expert%20Panel%20on%20Trial%20evidence)&rft.jtitle=Australian%20&%20New%20Zealand%20journal%20of%20obstetrics%20&%20gynaecology&rft.au=KROON,%20Ben&rft.aucorp=Australasian%20CREI%20Consensus%20Expert%20Panel%20on%20Trial%20evidence%20(ACCEPT)%20group&rft.date=2011-08&rft.volume=51&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=289&rft.epage=295&rft.pages=289-295&rft.issn=0004-8666&rft.eissn=1479-828X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/j.1479-828X.2011.01300.x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E894624129%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=894624129&rft_id=info:pmid/21806566&rfr_iscdi=true