Fibroids in infertility - consensus statement from ACCEPT (Australasian CREI Consensus Expert Panel on Trial evidence)
Fibroid management is surrounded by considerable controversy and uncertainty. This paper summarises the consensus developed by a group of Australasian subspecialists in reproductive endocrinology and infertility (the ACCEPT group) on the evidence concerning the impact and management of fibroids in i...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Australian & New Zealand journal of obstetrics & gynaecology 2011-08, Vol.51 (4), p.289-295 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 295 |
---|---|
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 289 |
container_title | Australian & New Zealand journal of obstetrics & gynaecology |
container_volume | 51 |
creator | KROON, Ben JOHNSON, Neil CHAPMAN, Michael YAZDANI, Anusch HART, Roger |
description | Fibroid management is surrounded by considerable controversy and uncertainty. This paper summarises the consensus developed by a group of Australasian subspecialists in reproductive endocrinology and infertility (the ACCEPT group) on the evidence concerning the impact and management of fibroids in infertility. The location of a fibroid within the uterus influences its effect on fertility. Subserosal fibroids do not appear to impact on fertility outcomes. Intramural (IM) fibroids may be associated with reduced fertility and an increased miscarriage rate (MR); however, there is insufficient evidence to inform whether myomectomy for IM fibroids improves fertility outcomes. Submucosal fibroids are associated with reduced fertility and an increased MR, and myomectomy for submucosal fibroids appears likely to improve fertility outcomes. The relative effect of multiple or different sized fibroids on fertility outcomes is uncertain, as is the relative usefulness of myomectomy in these situations. It is recommended that fibroids with suspected cavity involvement are defined by magnetic resonance imaging, sonohysterography or hysteroscopy because modalities such as transvaginal ultrasound and hysterosalpingography lack appropriate sensitivity and specificity. Medical management of fibroids delays efforts to conceive and is not recommended for the management of infertility associated with fibroids. Newer treatments such as uterine artery embolisation, radiofrequency ablation, bilateral uterine artery ligation, magnetic resonance‐guided focussed ultrasound surgery and fibroid myolysis require further investigation prior to their establishment in the routine management of fibroid‐associated infertility. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1111/j.1479-828X.2011.01300.x |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_894624129</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>894624129</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3570-70dafe3d07139e2c1c78ea80ac770fbd551422fb88d8fe020d771d3a35b87ec03</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo9UU2P0zAQtRCILQt_AfkGHBLGdhI7Bw5VaJddFbZCRXCznHgiueSjaydL--9J6NLRSDPSvDeaeY8QyiBmU3zcxyyReaS4-hVzYCwGJgDi4zOyuAyekwUAJJHKsuyKvAphD8DylCUvyRVnCrI0yxbkce1K3zsbqOumrNEPrnHDiUa06ruAXRgDDYMZsMVuoLXvW7ositV2R98vxzB405jgTEeL76tbWlwoq-NhWkW3psOG9h3deWcaio_OYlfhh9fkRW2agG-e6jX5sV7tii_R5v7mtlhuokqkEiIJ1tQoLEgmcuQVq6RCo8BUUkJd2nR6h_O6VMqqGoGDlZJZYURaKokViGvy7rz34PuHEcOgWxcqbJrprn4MWuVJxhPG8wn59gk5li1affCuNf6k_0s1AT6dAX9cg6fLnIGeLdF7PSuvZ-X1bIn-Z4k-6uXd_dxN_OjMd2HA44Vv_G-dSSFT_fPbjd7ebT6v17tCfxV_ARrKjtA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>894624129</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Fibroids in infertility - consensus statement from ACCEPT (Australasian CREI Consensus Expert Panel on Trial evidence)</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>KROON, Ben ; JOHNSON, Neil ; CHAPMAN, Michael ; YAZDANI, Anusch ; HART, Roger</creator><creatorcontrib>KROON, Ben ; JOHNSON, Neil ; CHAPMAN, Michael ; YAZDANI, Anusch ; HART, Roger ; Australasian CREI Consensus Expert Panel on Trial evidence (ACCEPT) group</creatorcontrib><description>Fibroid management is surrounded by considerable controversy and uncertainty. This paper summarises the consensus developed by a group of Australasian subspecialists in reproductive endocrinology and infertility (the ACCEPT group) on the evidence concerning the impact and management of fibroids in infertility. The location of a fibroid within the uterus influences its effect on fertility. Subserosal fibroids do not appear to impact on fertility outcomes. Intramural (IM) fibroids may be associated with reduced fertility and an increased miscarriage rate (MR); however, there is insufficient evidence to inform whether myomectomy for IM fibroids improves fertility outcomes. Submucosal fibroids are associated with reduced fertility and an increased MR, and myomectomy for submucosal fibroids appears likely to improve fertility outcomes. The relative effect of multiple or different sized fibroids on fertility outcomes is uncertain, as is the relative usefulness of myomectomy in these situations. It is recommended that fibroids with suspected cavity involvement are defined by magnetic resonance imaging, sonohysterography or hysteroscopy because modalities such as transvaginal ultrasound and hysterosalpingography lack appropriate sensitivity and specificity. Medical management of fibroids delays efforts to conceive and is not recommended for the management of infertility associated with fibroids. Newer treatments such as uterine artery embolisation, radiofrequency ablation, bilateral uterine artery ligation, magnetic resonance‐guided focussed ultrasound surgery and fibroid myolysis require further investigation prior to their establishment in the routine management of fibroid‐associated infertility.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0004-8666</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1479-828X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/j.1479-828X.2011.01300.x</identifier><identifier>PMID: 21806566</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>assisted reproductive technology ; Female ; fibroids ; Humans ; infertility ; Infertility, Female - etiology ; leiomyoma ; Leiomyoma - complications ; Leiomyoma - therapy ; myomectomy ; Reproductive Medicine ; Risk Factors ; Uterine Neoplasms - complications ; Uterine Neoplasms - therapy</subject><ispartof>Australian & New Zealand journal of obstetrics & gynaecology, 2011-08, Vol.51 (4), p.289-295</ispartof><rights>2011 The Authors. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology © 2011 The Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists</rights><rights>2011 The Authors. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology © 2011 The Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3570-70dafe3d07139e2c1c78ea80ac770fbd551422fb88d8fe020d771d3a35b87ec03</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fj.1479-828X.2011.01300.x$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fj.1479-828X.2011.01300.x$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>309,310,314,776,780,785,786,1411,23909,23910,25118,27901,27902,45550,45551</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21806566$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>KROON, Ben</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>JOHNSON, Neil</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>CHAPMAN, Michael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>YAZDANI, Anusch</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>HART, Roger</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Australasian CREI Consensus Expert Panel on Trial evidence (ACCEPT) group</creatorcontrib><title>Fibroids in infertility - consensus statement from ACCEPT (Australasian CREI Consensus Expert Panel on Trial evidence)</title><title>Australian & New Zealand journal of obstetrics & gynaecology</title><addtitle>Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol</addtitle><description>Fibroid management is surrounded by considerable controversy and uncertainty. This paper summarises the consensus developed by a group of Australasian subspecialists in reproductive endocrinology and infertility (the ACCEPT group) on the evidence concerning the impact and management of fibroids in infertility. The location of a fibroid within the uterus influences its effect on fertility. Subserosal fibroids do not appear to impact on fertility outcomes. Intramural (IM) fibroids may be associated with reduced fertility and an increased miscarriage rate (MR); however, there is insufficient evidence to inform whether myomectomy for IM fibroids improves fertility outcomes. Submucosal fibroids are associated with reduced fertility and an increased MR, and myomectomy for submucosal fibroids appears likely to improve fertility outcomes. The relative effect of multiple or different sized fibroids on fertility outcomes is uncertain, as is the relative usefulness of myomectomy in these situations. It is recommended that fibroids with suspected cavity involvement are defined by magnetic resonance imaging, sonohysterography or hysteroscopy because modalities such as transvaginal ultrasound and hysterosalpingography lack appropriate sensitivity and specificity. Medical management of fibroids delays efforts to conceive and is not recommended for the management of infertility associated with fibroids. Newer treatments such as uterine artery embolisation, radiofrequency ablation, bilateral uterine artery ligation, magnetic resonance‐guided focussed ultrasound surgery and fibroid myolysis require further investigation prior to their establishment in the routine management of fibroid‐associated infertility.</description><subject>assisted reproductive technology</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>fibroids</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>infertility</subject><subject>Infertility, Female - etiology</subject><subject>leiomyoma</subject><subject>Leiomyoma - complications</subject><subject>Leiomyoma - therapy</subject><subject>myomectomy</subject><subject>Reproductive Medicine</subject><subject>Risk Factors</subject><subject>Uterine Neoplasms - complications</subject><subject>Uterine Neoplasms - therapy</subject><issn>0004-8666</issn><issn>1479-828X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2011</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNo9UU2P0zAQtRCILQt_AfkGHBLGdhI7Bw5VaJddFbZCRXCznHgiueSjaydL--9J6NLRSDPSvDeaeY8QyiBmU3zcxyyReaS4-hVzYCwGJgDi4zOyuAyekwUAJJHKsuyKvAphD8DylCUvyRVnCrI0yxbkce1K3zsbqOumrNEPrnHDiUa06ruAXRgDDYMZsMVuoLXvW7ositV2R98vxzB405jgTEeL76tbWlwoq-NhWkW3psOG9h3deWcaio_OYlfhh9fkRW2agG-e6jX5sV7tii_R5v7mtlhuokqkEiIJ1tQoLEgmcuQVq6RCo8BUUkJd2nR6h_O6VMqqGoGDlZJZYURaKokViGvy7rz34PuHEcOgWxcqbJrprn4MWuVJxhPG8wn59gk5li1affCuNf6k_0s1AT6dAX9cg6fLnIGeLdF7PSuvZ-X1bIn-Z4k-6uXd_dxN_OjMd2HA44Vv_G-dSSFT_fPbjd7ebT6v17tCfxV_ARrKjtA</recordid><startdate>201108</startdate><enddate>201108</enddate><creator>KROON, Ben</creator><creator>JOHNSON, Neil</creator><creator>CHAPMAN, Michael</creator><creator>YAZDANI, Anusch</creator><creator>HART, Roger</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201108</creationdate><title>Fibroids in infertility - consensus statement from ACCEPT (Australasian CREI Consensus Expert Panel on Trial evidence)</title><author>KROON, Ben ; JOHNSON, Neil ; CHAPMAN, Michael ; YAZDANI, Anusch ; HART, Roger</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3570-70dafe3d07139e2c1c78ea80ac770fbd551422fb88d8fe020d771d3a35b87ec03</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2011</creationdate><topic>assisted reproductive technology</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>fibroids</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>infertility</topic><topic>Infertility, Female - etiology</topic><topic>leiomyoma</topic><topic>Leiomyoma - complications</topic><topic>Leiomyoma - therapy</topic><topic>myomectomy</topic><topic>Reproductive Medicine</topic><topic>Risk Factors</topic><topic>Uterine Neoplasms - complications</topic><topic>Uterine Neoplasms - therapy</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>KROON, Ben</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>JOHNSON, Neil</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>CHAPMAN, Michael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>YAZDANI, Anusch</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>HART, Roger</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Australasian CREI Consensus Expert Panel on Trial evidence (ACCEPT) group</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Australian & New Zealand journal of obstetrics & gynaecology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>KROON, Ben</au><au>JOHNSON, Neil</au><au>CHAPMAN, Michael</au><au>YAZDANI, Anusch</au><au>HART, Roger</au><aucorp>Australasian CREI Consensus Expert Panel on Trial evidence (ACCEPT) group</aucorp><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Fibroids in infertility - consensus statement from ACCEPT (Australasian CREI Consensus Expert Panel on Trial evidence)</atitle><jtitle>Australian & New Zealand journal of obstetrics & gynaecology</jtitle><addtitle>Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol</addtitle><date>2011-08</date><risdate>2011</risdate><volume>51</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>289</spage><epage>295</epage><pages>289-295</pages><issn>0004-8666</issn><eissn>1479-828X</eissn><abstract>Fibroid management is surrounded by considerable controversy and uncertainty. This paper summarises the consensus developed by a group of Australasian subspecialists in reproductive endocrinology and infertility (the ACCEPT group) on the evidence concerning the impact and management of fibroids in infertility. The location of a fibroid within the uterus influences its effect on fertility. Subserosal fibroids do not appear to impact on fertility outcomes. Intramural (IM) fibroids may be associated with reduced fertility and an increased miscarriage rate (MR); however, there is insufficient evidence to inform whether myomectomy for IM fibroids improves fertility outcomes. Submucosal fibroids are associated with reduced fertility and an increased MR, and myomectomy for submucosal fibroids appears likely to improve fertility outcomes. The relative effect of multiple or different sized fibroids on fertility outcomes is uncertain, as is the relative usefulness of myomectomy in these situations. It is recommended that fibroids with suspected cavity involvement are defined by magnetic resonance imaging, sonohysterography or hysteroscopy because modalities such as transvaginal ultrasound and hysterosalpingography lack appropriate sensitivity and specificity. Medical management of fibroids delays efforts to conceive and is not recommended for the management of infertility associated with fibroids. Newer treatments such as uterine artery embolisation, radiofrequency ablation, bilateral uterine artery ligation, magnetic resonance‐guided focussed ultrasound surgery and fibroid myolysis require further investigation prior to their establishment in the routine management of fibroid‐associated infertility.</abstract><cop>Oxford, UK</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><pmid>21806566</pmid><doi>10.1111/j.1479-828X.2011.01300.x</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0004-8666 |
ispartof | Australian & New Zealand journal of obstetrics & gynaecology, 2011-08, Vol.51 (4), p.289-295 |
issn | 0004-8666 1479-828X |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_894624129 |
source | MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete |
subjects | assisted reproductive technology Female fibroids Humans infertility Infertility, Female - etiology leiomyoma Leiomyoma - complications Leiomyoma - therapy myomectomy Reproductive Medicine Risk Factors Uterine Neoplasms - complications Uterine Neoplasms - therapy |
title | Fibroids in infertility - consensus statement from ACCEPT (Australasian CREI Consensus Expert Panel on Trial evidence) |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-18T08%3A35%3A10IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Fibroids%20in%20infertility%20-%20consensus%20statement%20from%20ACCEPT%20(Australasian%20CREI%20Consensus%20Expert%20Panel%20on%20Trial%20evidence)&rft.jtitle=Australian%20&%20New%20Zealand%20journal%20of%20obstetrics%20&%20gynaecology&rft.au=KROON,%20Ben&rft.aucorp=Australasian%20CREI%20Consensus%20Expert%20Panel%20on%20Trial%20evidence%20(ACCEPT)%20group&rft.date=2011-08&rft.volume=51&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=289&rft.epage=295&rft.pages=289-295&rft.issn=0004-8666&rft.eissn=1479-828X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/j.1479-828X.2011.01300.x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E894624129%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=894624129&rft_id=info:pmid/21806566&rfr_iscdi=true |