ER-α agonist induces conversion of fibroblasts into myofibroblasts, while ER-β agonist increases ECM production and wound tensile strength of healing skin wounds in ovariectomised rats

:  Oestrogen deprivation is one of the major factors responsible for many age‐related processes, including poor wound healing in women. Previously, it has been shown that oestrogens have a modulatory effect in different wound‐healing models. Therefore, in this study, the effect of selective oestroge...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Experimental dermatology 2011-09, Vol.20 (9), p.703-708
Hauptverfasser: Novotný, Martin, Vasilenko, Tomáš, Varinská, Lenka, Smetana Jr, Karel, Szabo, Pavol, Šarišský, Marek, Dvořánková, Barbora, Mojžiš, Ján, Bobrov, Nikita, Toporcerová, Silvia, Sabol, Franitšek, Matthews, Bryan J.O., Gál, Peter
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 708
container_issue 9
container_start_page 703
container_title Experimental dermatology
container_volume 20
creator Novotný, Martin
Vasilenko, Tomáš
Varinská, Lenka
Smetana Jr, Karel
Szabo, Pavol
Šarišský, Marek
Dvořánková, Barbora
Mojžiš, Ján
Bobrov, Nikita
Toporcerová, Silvia
Sabol, Franitšek
Matthews, Bryan J.O.
Gál, Peter
description :  Oestrogen deprivation is one of the major factors responsible for many age‐related processes, including poor wound healing in women. Previously, it has been shown that oestrogens have a modulatory effect in different wound‐healing models. Therefore, in this study, the effect of selective oestrogen receptor (ER) agonists (PPT – ER‐α agonist, DPN – ER‐β agonist) on excisional and incisional wound‐healing models was compared in ovariectomised rats in vivo as well as on human dermal fibroblasts (HDF) and human umbilical endothelial cells (HUVEC) in vitro. In the in vivo study, 4 months after either ovariectomy or sham ovariectomy, Sprague‐Dawley rats were randomly divided into four groups and subjected to two incisional and excisional wounds: (i) control – sham operated, vehicle‐treated; (ii) ovariectomised, vehicle‐treated; (iii) ovariectomised, PPT treated; (iv) ovariectomised, DPN treated. In the in vitro study, HDFs and HUVECs were used. After treatment with ER agonists, cells were processed for immunocytochemistry and gelatin zymography. Our study shows that stimulation of ER‐α leads to the differentiation of fibroblasts into myofibroblasts both in vivo and in vitro. On the other hand, the formation of extracellular matrix was more prominent, and wound tensile strength (TS) was increased when ER‐β was stimulated. In contrast, stimulation of ER‐α led to a more prominent increase in the expression of MMP‐2 and decrease in wound TS. New information is presented in this investigation concerning oestrogen replacement therapy (ERT) in different wound‐healing models. This study demonstrates that the ERT should be both wound and receptor‐type specific.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/j.1600-0625.2011.01284.x
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_893987271</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>893987271</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4364-e8e375ee28fe174960c6a224c4c815ef36b9ca66d9d03d5f46c1a791cd0c03e83</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNks2SEyEUhSlLy4mjr2CxsdzYEfqHphcurBhHq2a0_CvdUYS-nZDpwAzQk-SxdOlD-EyCHeMsZQEU_Z1zuZxGCFMypXE8X08pIyQjLK-mOaF0SmjOy-nuDpocP9xFE9IQlrGaVCfogfdrQmhd1NV9dJLTitSEsQn6Of-Y_fqO5dIa7QPWph0UeKysuQHntTXYdrjTC2cXvfTBRyJYvNnbW2fP8Hale8DJ6sctK-VA-mg2n13gK2ejc0iG0rR4a4c4BzA-CX1wYJZhlWqtQPbaLLG_1GbEUk1sb6TToILdaA8tdjL4h-heJ3sPjw7rKfryev559iY7f3_2dvbyPFNlwcoMOMSmAXLeAa3LhhHFZJ6XqlScVtAVbNEoyVjbtKRoq65kisq6oaolihTAi1P0dPSNPVwP4IOId1DQ99KAHbzgTdHwOq9pJPlIKme9d9CJK6c30u0FJSIFJ9Yi5SNSPiIFJ_4EJ3ZR-vhQZFhsoD0K_yYVgScHQHol-85Jo7T_x5Wxs6pJ3IuR28aX3f_3BcT826u0i_ps1McMYXfUS3cpWPp7xNd3Z4JffJp9KHMuyuI3cDDIkg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>893987271</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>ER-α agonist induces conversion of fibroblasts into myofibroblasts, while ER-β agonist increases ECM production and wound tensile strength of healing skin wounds in ovariectomised rats</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Novotný, Martin ; Vasilenko, Tomáš ; Varinská, Lenka ; Smetana Jr, Karel ; Szabo, Pavol ; Šarišský, Marek ; Dvořánková, Barbora ; Mojžiš, Ján ; Bobrov, Nikita ; Toporcerová, Silvia ; Sabol, Franitšek ; Matthews, Bryan J.O. ; Gál, Peter</creator><creatorcontrib>Novotný, Martin ; Vasilenko, Tomáš ; Varinská, Lenka ; Smetana Jr, Karel ; Szabo, Pavol ; Šarišský, Marek ; Dvořánková, Barbora ; Mojžiš, Ján ; Bobrov, Nikita ; Toporcerová, Silvia ; Sabol, Franitšek ; Matthews, Bryan J.O. ; Gál, Peter</creatorcontrib><description>:  Oestrogen deprivation is one of the major factors responsible for many age‐related processes, including poor wound healing in women. Previously, it has been shown that oestrogens have a modulatory effect in different wound‐healing models. Therefore, in this study, the effect of selective oestrogen receptor (ER) agonists (PPT – ER‐α agonist, DPN – ER‐β agonist) on excisional and incisional wound‐healing models was compared in ovariectomised rats in vivo as well as on human dermal fibroblasts (HDF) and human umbilical endothelial cells (HUVEC) in vitro. In the in vivo study, 4 months after either ovariectomy or sham ovariectomy, Sprague‐Dawley rats were randomly divided into four groups and subjected to two incisional and excisional wounds: (i) control – sham operated, vehicle‐treated; (ii) ovariectomised, vehicle‐treated; (iii) ovariectomised, PPT treated; (iv) ovariectomised, DPN treated. In the in vitro study, HDFs and HUVECs were used. After treatment with ER agonists, cells were processed for immunocytochemistry and gelatin zymography. Our study shows that stimulation of ER‐α leads to the differentiation of fibroblasts into myofibroblasts both in vivo and in vitro. On the other hand, the formation of extracellular matrix was more prominent, and wound tensile strength (TS) was increased when ER‐β was stimulated. In contrast, stimulation of ER‐α led to a more prominent increase in the expression of MMP‐2 and decrease in wound TS. New information is presented in this investigation concerning oestrogen replacement therapy (ERT) in different wound‐healing models. This study demonstrates that the ERT should be both wound and receptor‐type specific.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0906-6705</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1600-0625</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0625.2011.01284.x</identifier><identifier>PMID: 21507066</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Animals ; Biological and medical sciences ; cell differentiation ; Cell Differentiation - drug effects ; Cells, Cultured ; Dermatology ; Estrogen Receptor alpha - agonists ; Estrogen Receptor beta - agonists ; Extracellular Matrix - drug effects ; Female ; Fibroblasts - cytology ; Fibroblasts - drug effects ; hormone replacement therapy ; Human Umbilical Vein Endothelial Cells ; Humans ; In Vitro Techniques ; Medical sciences ; myofibroblast ; Myofibroblasts - cytology ; Myofibroblasts - drug effects ; Nitriles - pharmacology ; oestrogen receptor ; Ovariectomy ; Phenols - pharmacology ; Pyrazoles - pharmacology ; Rats ; Rats, Sprague-Dawley ; regeneration ; Selective Estrogen Receptor Modulators - pharmacology ; Skin - drug effects ; Skin - injuries ; Skin - physiopathology ; Tensile Strength - drug effects ; tissue repair ; Wound Healing - drug effects</subject><ispartof>Experimental dermatology, 2011-09, Vol.20 (9), p.703-708</ispartof><rights>2011 John Wiley &amp; Sons A/S</rights><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>2011 John Wiley &amp; Sons A/S.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4364-e8e375ee28fe174960c6a224c4c815ef36b9ca66d9d03d5f46c1a791cd0c03e83</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4364-e8e375ee28fe174960c6a224c4c815ef36b9ca66d9d03d5f46c1a791cd0c03e83</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fj.1600-0625.2011.01284.x$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fj.1600-0625.2011.01284.x$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27903,27904,45553,45554</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=24496596$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21507066$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Novotný, Martin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vasilenko, Tomáš</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Varinská, Lenka</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Smetana Jr, Karel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Szabo, Pavol</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Šarišský, Marek</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dvořánková, Barbora</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mojžiš, Ján</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bobrov, Nikita</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Toporcerová, Silvia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sabol, Franitšek</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Matthews, Bryan J.O.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gál, Peter</creatorcontrib><title>ER-α agonist induces conversion of fibroblasts into myofibroblasts, while ER-β agonist increases ECM production and wound tensile strength of healing skin wounds in ovariectomised rats</title><title>Experimental dermatology</title><addtitle>Exp Dermatol</addtitle><description>:  Oestrogen deprivation is one of the major factors responsible for many age‐related processes, including poor wound healing in women. Previously, it has been shown that oestrogens have a modulatory effect in different wound‐healing models. Therefore, in this study, the effect of selective oestrogen receptor (ER) agonists (PPT – ER‐α agonist, DPN – ER‐β agonist) on excisional and incisional wound‐healing models was compared in ovariectomised rats in vivo as well as on human dermal fibroblasts (HDF) and human umbilical endothelial cells (HUVEC) in vitro. In the in vivo study, 4 months after either ovariectomy or sham ovariectomy, Sprague‐Dawley rats were randomly divided into four groups and subjected to two incisional and excisional wounds: (i) control – sham operated, vehicle‐treated; (ii) ovariectomised, vehicle‐treated; (iii) ovariectomised, PPT treated; (iv) ovariectomised, DPN treated. In the in vitro study, HDFs and HUVECs were used. After treatment with ER agonists, cells were processed for immunocytochemistry and gelatin zymography. Our study shows that stimulation of ER‐α leads to the differentiation of fibroblasts into myofibroblasts both in vivo and in vitro. On the other hand, the formation of extracellular matrix was more prominent, and wound tensile strength (TS) was increased when ER‐β was stimulated. In contrast, stimulation of ER‐α led to a more prominent increase in the expression of MMP‐2 and decrease in wound TS. New information is presented in this investigation concerning oestrogen replacement therapy (ERT) in different wound‐healing models. This study demonstrates that the ERT should be both wound and receptor‐type specific.</description><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>cell differentiation</subject><subject>Cell Differentiation - drug effects</subject><subject>Cells, Cultured</subject><subject>Dermatology</subject><subject>Estrogen Receptor alpha - agonists</subject><subject>Estrogen Receptor beta - agonists</subject><subject>Extracellular Matrix - drug effects</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Fibroblasts - cytology</subject><subject>Fibroblasts - drug effects</subject><subject>hormone replacement therapy</subject><subject>Human Umbilical Vein Endothelial Cells</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>In Vitro Techniques</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>myofibroblast</subject><subject>Myofibroblasts - cytology</subject><subject>Myofibroblasts - drug effects</subject><subject>Nitriles - pharmacology</subject><subject>oestrogen receptor</subject><subject>Ovariectomy</subject><subject>Phenols - pharmacology</subject><subject>Pyrazoles - pharmacology</subject><subject>Rats</subject><subject>Rats, Sprague-Dawley</subject><subject>regeneration</subject><subject>Selective Estrogen Receptor Modulators - pharmacology</subject><subject>Skin - drug effects</subject><subject>Skin - injuries</subject><subject>Skin - physiopathology</subject><subject>Tensile Strength - drug effects</subject><subject>tissue repair</subject><subject>Wound Healing - drug effects</subject><issn>0906-6705</issn><issn>1600-0625</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2011</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqNks2SEyEUhSlLy4mjr2CxsdzYEfqHphcurBhHq2a0_CvdUYS-nZDpwAzQk-SxdOlD-EyCHeMsZQEU_Z1zuZxGCFMypXE8X08pIyQjLK-mOaF0SmjOy-nuDpocP9xFE9IQlrGaVCfogfdrQmhd1NV9dJLTitSEsQn6Of-Y_fqO5dIa7QPWph0UeKysuQHntTXYdrjTC2cXvfTBRyJYvNnbW2fP8Hale8DJ6sctK-VA-mg2n13gK2ejc0iG0rR4a4c4BzA-CX1wYJZhlWqtQPbaLLG_1GbEUk1sb6TToILdaA8tdjL4h-heJ3sPjw7rKfryev559iY7f3_2dvbyPFNlwcoMOMSmAXLeAa3LhhHFZJ6XqlScVtAVbNEoyVjbtKRoq65kisq6oaolihTAi1P0dPSNPVwP4IOId1DQ99KAHbzgTdHwOq9pJPlIKme9d9CJK6c30u0FJSIFJ9Yi5SNSPiIFJ_4EJ3ZR-vhQZFhsoD0K_yYVgScHQHol-85Jo7T_x5Wxs6pJ3IuR28aX3f_3BcT826u0i_ps1McMYXfUS3cpWPp7xNd3Z4JffJp9KHMuyuI3cDDIkg</recordid><startdate>201109</startdate><enddate>201109</enddate><creator>Novotný, Martin</creator><creator>Vasilenko, Tomáš</creator><creator>Varinská, Lenka</creator><creator>Smetana Jr, Karel</creator><creator>Szabo, Pavol</creator><creator>Šarišský, Marek</creator><creator>Dvořánková, Barbora</creator><creator>Mojžiš, Ján</creator><creator>Bobrov, Nikita</creator><creator>Toporcerová, Silvia</creator><creator>Sabol, Franitšek</creator><creator>Matthews, Bryan J.O.</creator><creator>Gál, Peter</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><general>Blackwell</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201109</creationdate><title>ER-α agonist induces conversion of fibroblasts into myofibroblasts, while ER-β agonist increases ECM production and wound tensile strength of healing skin wounds in ovariectomised rats</title><author>Novotný, Martin ; Vasilenko, Tomáš ; Varinská, Lenka ; Smetana Jr, Karel ; Szabo, Pavol ; Šarišský, Marek ; Dvořánková, Barbora ; Mojžiš, Ján ; Bobrov, Nikita ; Toporcerová, Silvia ; Sabol, Franitšek ; Matthews, Bryan J.O. ; Gál, Peter</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4364-e8e375ee28fe174960c6a224c4c815ef36b9ca66d9d03d5f46c1a791cd0c03e83</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2011</creationdate><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>cell differentiation</topic><topic>Cell Differentiation - drug effects</topic><topic>Cells, Cultured</topic><topic>Dermatology</topic><topic>Estrogen Receptor alpha - agonists</topic><topic>Estrogen Receptor beta - agonists</topic><topic>Extracellular Matrix - drug effects</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Fibroblasts - cytology</topic><topic>Fibroblasts - drug effects</topic><topic>hormone replacement therapy</topic><topic>Human Umbilical Vein Endothelial Cells</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>In Vitro Techniques</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>myofibroblast</topic><topic>Myofibroblasts - cytology</topic><topic>Myofibroblasts - drug effects</topic><topic>Nitriles - pharmacology</topic><topic>oestrogen receptor</topic><topic>Ovariectomy</topic><topic>Phenols - pharmacology</topic><topic>Pyrazoles - pharmacology</topic><topic>Rats</topic><topic>Rats, Sprague-Dawley</topic><topic>regeneration</topic><topic>Selective Estrogen Receptor Modulators - pharmacology</topic><topic>Skin - drug effects</topic><topic>Skin - injuries</topic><topic>Skin - physiopathology</topic><topic>Tensile Strength - drug effects</topic><topic>tissue repair</topic><topic>Wound Healing - drug effects</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Novotný, Martin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vasilenko, Tomáš</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Varinská, Lenka</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Smetana Jr, Karel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Szabo, Pavol</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Šarišský, Marek</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dvořánková, Barbora</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mojžiš, Ján</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bobrov, Nikita</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Toporcerová, Silvia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sabol, Franitšek</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Matthews, Bryan J.O.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gál, Peter</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Experimental dermatology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Novotný, Martin</au><au>Vasilenko, Tomáš</au><au>Varinská, Lenka</au><au>Smetana Jr, Karel</au><au>Szabo, Pavol</au><au>Šarišský, Marek</au><au>Dvořánková, Barbora</au><au>Mojžiš, Ján</au><au>Bobrov, Nikita</au><au>Toporcerová, Silvia</au><au>Sabol, Franitšek</au><au>Matthews, Bryan J.O.</au><au>Gál, Peter</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>ER-α agonist induces conversion of fibroblasts into myofibroblasts, while ER-β agonist increases ECM production and wound tensile strength of healing skin wounds in ovariectomised rats</atitle><jtitle>Experimental dermatology</jtitle><addtitle>Exp Dermatol</addtitle><date>2011-09</date><risdate>2011</risdate><volume>20</volume><issue>9</issue><spage>703</spage><epage>708</epage><pages>703-708</pages><issn>0906-6705</issn><eissn>1600-0625</eissn><abstract>:  Oestrogen deprivation is one of the major factors responsible for many age‐related processes, including poor wound healing in women. Previously, it has been shown that oestrogens have a modulatory effect in different wound‐healing models. Therefore, in this study, the effect of selective oestrogen receptor (ER) agonists (PPT – ER‐α agonist, DPN – ER‐β agonist) on excisional and incisional wound‐healing models was compared in ovariectomised rats in vivo as well as on human dermal fibroblasts (HDF) and human umbilical endothelial cells (HUVEC) in vitro. In the in vivo study, 4 months after either ovariectomy or sham ovariectomy, Sprague‐Dawley rats were randomly divided into four groups and subjected to two incisional and excisional wounds: (i) control – sham operated, vehicle‐treated; (ii) ovariectomised, vehicle‐treated; (iii) ovariectomised, PPT treated; (iv) ovariectomised, DPN treated. In the in vitro study, HDFs and HUVECs were used. After treatment with ER agonists, cells were processed for immunocytochemistry and gelatin zymography. Our study shows that stimulation of ER‐α leads to the differentiation of fibroblasts into myofibroblasts both in vivo and in vitro. On the other hand, the formation of extracellular matrix was more prominent, and wound tensile strength (TS) was increased when ER‐β was stimulated. In contrast, stimulation of ER‐α led to a more prominent increase in the expression of MMP‐2 and decrease in wound TS. New information is presented in this investigation concerning oestrogen replacement therapy (ERT) in different wound‐healing models. This study demonstrates that the ERT should be both wound and receptor‐type specific.</abstract><cop>Oxford, UK</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><pmid>21507066</pmid><doi>10.1111/j.1600-0625.2011.01284.x</doi><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0906-6705
ispartof Experimental dermatology, 2011-09, Vol.20 (9), p.703-708
issn 0906-6705
1600-0625
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_893987271
source MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete
subjects Animals
Biological and medical sciences
cell differentiation
Cell Differentiation - drug effects
Cells, Cultured
Dermatology
Estrogen Receptor alpha - agonists
Estrogen Receptor beta - agonists
Extracellular Matrix - drug effects
Female
Fibroblasts - cytology
Fibroblasts - drug effects
hormone replacement therapy
Human Umbilical Vein Endothelial Cells
Humans
In Vitro Techniques
Medical sciences
myofibroblast
Myofibroblasts - cytology
Myofibroblasts - drug effects
Nitriles - pharmacology
oestrogen receptor
Ovariectomy
Phenols - pharmacology
Pyrazoles - pharmacology
Rats
Rats, Sprague-Dawley
regeneration
Selective Estrogen Receptor Modulators - pharmacology
Skin - drug effects
Skin - injuries
Skin - physiopathology
Tensile Strength - drug effects
tissue repair
Wound Healing - drug effects
title ER-α agonist induces conversion of fibroblasts into myofibroblasts, while ER-β agonist increases ECM production and wound tensile strength of healing skin wounds in ovariectomised rats
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-23T05%3A16%3A15IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=ER-%CE%B1%20agonist%20induces%20conversion%20of%20fibroblasts%20into%20myofibroblasts,%20while%20ER-%CE%B2%20agonist%20increases%20ECM%20production%20and%20wound%20tensile%20strength%20of%20healing%20skin%20wounds%20in%20ovariectomised%20rats&rft.jtitle=Experimental%20dermatology&rft.au=Novotn%C3%BD,%20Martin&rft.date=2011-09&rft.volume=20&rft.issue=9&rft.spage=703&rft.epage=708&rft.pages=703-708&rft.issn=0906-6705&rft.eissn=1600-0625&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/j.1600-0625.2011.01284.x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E893987271%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=893987271&rft_id=info:pmid/21507066&rfr_iscdi=true