ER-α agonist induces conversion of fibroblasts into myofibroblasts, while ER-β agonist increases ECM production and wound tensile strength of healing skin wounds in ovariectomised rats
: Oestrogen deprivation is one of the major factors responsible for many age‐related processes, including poor wound healing in women. Previously, it has been shown that oestrogens have a modulatory effect in different wound‐healing models. Therefore, in this study, the effect of selective oestroge...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Experimental dermatology 2011-09, Vol.20 (9), p.703-708 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 708 |
---|---|
container_issue | 9 |
container_start_page | 703 |
container_title | Experimental dermatology |
container_volume | 20 |
creator | Novotný, Martin Vasilenko, Tomáš Varinská, Lenka Smetana Jr, Karel Szabo, Pavol Šarišský, Marek Dvořánková, Barbora Mojžiš, Ján Bobrov, Nikita Toporcerová, Silvia Sabol, Franitšek Matthews, Bryan J.O. Gál, Peter |
description | : Oestrogen deprivation is one of the major factors responsible for many age‐related processes, including poor wound healing in women. Previously, it has been shown that oestrogens have a modulatory effect in different wound‐healing models. Therefore, in this study, the effect of selective oestrogen receptor (ER) agonists (PPT – ER‐α agonist, DPN – ER‐β agonist) on excisional and incisional wound‐healing models was compared in ovariectomised rats in vivo as well as on human dermal fibroblasts (HDF) and human umbilical endothelial cells (HUVEC) in vitro. In the in vivo study, 4 months after either ovariectomy or sham ovariectomy, Sprague‐Dawley rats were randomly divided into four groups and subjected to two incisional and excisional wounds: (i) control – sham operated, vehicle‐treated; (ii) ovariectomised, vehicle‐treated; (iii) ovariectomised, PPT treated; (iv) ovariectomised, DPN treated. In the in vitro study, HDFs and HUVECs were used. After treatment with ER agonists, cells were processed for immunocytochemistry and gelatin zymography. Our study shows that stimulation of ER‐α leads to the differentiation of fibroblasts into myofibroblasts both in vivo and in vitro. On the other hand, the formation of extracellular matrix was more prominent, and wound tensile strength (TS) was increased when ER‐β was stimulated. In contrast, stimulation of ER‐α led to a more prominent increase in the expression of MMP‐2 and decrease in wound TS. New information is presented in this investigation concerning oestrogen replacement therapy (ERT) in different wound‐healing models. This study demonstrates that the ERT should be both wound and receptor‐type specific. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1111/j.1600-0625.2011.01284.x |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_893987271</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>893987271</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4364-e8e375ee28fe174960c6a224c4c815ef36b9ca66d9d03d5f46c1a791cd0c03e83</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNks2SEyEUhSlLy4mjr2CxsdzYEfqHphcurBhHq2a0_CvdUYS-nZDpwAzQk-SxdOlD-EyCHeMsZQEU_Z1zuZxGCFMypXE8X08pIyQjLK-mOaF0SmjOy-nuDpocP9xFE9IQlrGaVCfogfdrQmhd1NV9dJLTitSEsQn6Of-Y_fqO5dIa7QPWph0UeKysuQHntTXYdrjTC2cXvfTBRyJYvNnbW2fP8Hale8DJ6sctK-VA-mg2n13gK2ejc0iG0rR4a4c4BzA-CX1wYJZhlWqtQPbaLLG_1GbEUk1sb6TToILdaA8tdjL4h-heJ3sPjw7rKfryev559iY7f3_2dvbyPFNlwcoMOMSmAXLeAa3LhhHFZJ6XqlScVtAVbNEoyVjbtKRoq65kisq6oaolihTAi1P0dPSNPVwP4IOId1DQ99KAHbzgTdHwOq9pJPlIKme9d9CJK6c30u0FJSIFJ9Yi5SNSPiIFJ_4EJ3ZR-vhQZFhsoD0K_yYVgScHQHol-85Jo7T_x5Wxs6pJ3IuR28aX3f_3BcT826u0i_ps1McMYXfUS3cpWPp7xNd3Z4JffJp9KHMuyuI3cDDIkg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>893987271</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>ER-α agonist induces conversion of fibroblasts into myofibroblasts, while ER-β agonist increases ECM production and wound tensile strength of healing skin wounds in ovariectomised rats</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Novotný, Martin ; Vasilenko, Tomáš ; Varinská, Lenka ; Smetana Jr, Karel ; Szabo, Pavol ; Šarišský, Marek ; Dvořánková, Barbora ; Mojžiš, Ján ; Bobrov, Nikita ; Toporcerová, Silvia ; Sabol, Franitšek ; Matthews, Bryan J.O. ; Gál, Peter</creator><creatorcontrib>Novotný, Martin ; Vasilenko, Tomáš ; Varinská, Lenka ; Smetana Jr, Karel ; Szabo, Pavol ; Šarišský, Marek ; Dvořánková, Barbora ; Mojžiš, Ján ; Bobrov, Nikita ; Toporcerová, Silvia ; Sabol, Franitšek ; Matthews, Bryan J.O. ; Gál, Peter</creatorcontrib><description>: Oestrogen deprivation is one of the major factors responsible for many age‐related processes, including poor wound healing in women. Previously, it has been shown that oestrogens have a modulatory effect in different wound‐healing models. Therefore, in this study, the effect of selective oestrogen receptor (ER) agonists (PPT – ER‐α agonist, DPN – ER‐β agonist) on excisional and incisional wound‐healing models was compared in ovariectomised rats in vivo as well as on human dermal fibroblasts (HDF) and human umbilical endothelial cells (HUVEC) in vitro. In the in vivo study, 4 months after either ovariectomy or sham ovariectomy, Sprague‐Dawley rats were randomly divided into four groups and subjected to two incisional and excisional wounds: (i) control – sham operated, vehicle‐treated; (ii) ovariectomised, vehicle‐treated; (iii) ovariectomised, PPT treated; (iv) ovariectomised, DPN treated. In the in vitro study, HDFs and HUVECs were used. After treatment with ER agonists, cells were processed for immunocytochemistry and gelatin zymography. Our study shows that stimulation of ER‐α leads to the differentiation of fibroblasts into myofibroblasts both in vivo and in vitro. On the other hand, the formation of extracellular matrix was more prominent, and wound tensile strength (TS) was increased when ER‐β was stimulated. In contrast, stimulation of ER‐α led to a more prominent increase in the expression of MMP‐2 and decrease in wound TS. New information is presented in this investigation concerning oestrogen replacement therapy (ERT) in different wound‐healing models. This study demonstrates that the ERT should be both wound and receptor‐type specific.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0906-6705</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1600-0625</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0625.2011.01284.x</identifier><identifier>PMID: 21507066</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Animals ; Biological and medical sciences ; cell differentiation ; Cell Differentiation - drug effects ; Cells, Cultured ; Dermatology ; Estrogen Receptor alpha - agonists ; Estrogen Receptor beta - agonists ; Extracellular Matrix - drug effects ; Female ; Fibroblasts - cytology ; Fibroblasts - drug effects ; hormone replacement therapy ; Human Umbilical Vein Endothelial Cells ; Humans ; In Vitro Techniques ; Medical sciences ; myofibroblast ; Myofibroblasts - cytology ; Myofibroblasts - drug effects ; Nitriles - pharmacology ; oestrogen receptor ; Ovariectomy ; Phenols - pharmacology ; Pyrazoles - pharmacology ; Rats ; Rats, Sprague-Dawley ; regeneration ; Selective Estrogen Receptor Modulators - pharmacology ; Skin - drug effects ; Skin - injuries ; Skin - physiopathology ; Tensile Strength - drug effects ; tissue repair ; Wound Healing - drug effects</subject><ispartof>Experimental dermatology, 2011-09, Vol.20 (9), p.703-708</ispartof><rights>2011 John Wiley & Sons A/S</rights><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>2011 John Wiley & Sons A/S.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4364-e8e375ee28fe174960c6a224c4c815ef36b9ca66d9d03d5f46c1a791cd0c03e83</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4364-e8e375ee28fe174960c6a224c4c815ef36b9ca66d9d03d5f46c1a791cd0c03e83</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fj.1600-0625.2011.01284.x$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fj.1600-0625.2011.01284.x$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27903,27904,45553,45554</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=24496596$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21507066$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Novotný, Martin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vasilenko, Tomáš</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Varinská, Lenka</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Smetana Jr, Karel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Szabo, Pavol</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Šarišský, Marek</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dvořánková, Barbora</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mojžiš, Ján</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bobrov, Nikita</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Toporcerová, Silvia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sabol, Franitšek</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Matthews, Bryan J.O.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gál, Peter</creatorcontrib><title>ER-α agonist induces conversion of fibroblasts into myofibroblasts, while ER-β agonist increases ECM production and wound tensile strength of healing skin wounds in ovariectomised rats</title><title>Experimental dermatology</title><addtitle>Exp Dermatol</addtitle><description>: Oestrogen deprivation is one of the major factors responsible for many age‐related processes, including poor wound healing in women. Previously, it has been shown that oestrogens have a modulatory effect in different wound‐healing models. Therefore, in this study, the effect of selective oestrogen receptor (ER) agonists (PPT – ER‐α agonist, DPN – ER‐β agonist) on excisional and incisional wound‐healing models was compared in ovariectomised rats in vivo as well as on human dermal fibroblasts (HDF) and human umbilical endothelial cells (HUVEC) in vitro. In the in vivo study, 4 months after either ovariectomy or sham ovariectomy, Sprague‐Dawley rats were randomly divided into four groups and subjected to two incisional and excisional wounds: (i) control – sham operated, vehicle‐treated; (ii) ovariectomised, vehicle‐treated; (iii) ovariectomised, PPT treated; (iv) ovariectomised, DPN treated. In the in vitro study, HDFs and HUVECs were used. After treatment with ER agonists, cells were processed for immunocytochemistry and gelatin zymography. Our study shows that stimulation of ER‐α leads to the differentiation of fibroblasts into myofibroblasts both in vivo and in vitro. On the other hand, the formation of extracellular matrix was more prominent, and wound tensile strength (TS) was increased when ER‐β was stimulated. In contrast, stimulation of ER‐α led to a more prominent increase in the expression of MMP‐2 and decrease in wound TS. New information is presented in this investigation concerning oestrogen replacement therapy (ERT) in different wound‐healing models. This study demonstrates that the ERT should be both wound and receptor‐type specific.</description><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>cell differentiation</subject><subject>Cell Differentiation - drug effects</subject><subject>Cells, Cultured</subject><subject>Dermatology</subject><subject>Estrogen Receptor alpha - agonists</subject><subject>Estrogen Receptor beta - agonists</subject><subject>Extracellular Matrix - drug effects</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Fibroblasts - cytology</subject><subject>Fibroblasts - drug effects</subject><subject>hormone replacement therapy</subject><subject>Human Umbilical Vein Endothelial Cells</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>In Vitro Techniques</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>myofibroblast</subject><subject>Myofibroblasts - cytology</subject><subject>Myofibroblasts - drug effects</subject><subject>Nitriles - pharmacology</subject><subject>oestrogen receptor</subject><subject>Ovariectomy</subject><subject>Phenols - pharmacology</subject><subject>Pyrazoles - pharmacology</subject><subject>Rats</subject><subject>Rats, Sprague-Dawley</subject><subject>regeneration</subject><subject>Selective Estrogen Receptor Modulators - pharmacology</subject><subject>Skin - drug effects</subject><subject>Skin - injuries</subject><subject>Skin - physiopathology</subject><subject>Tensile Strength - drug effects</subject><subject>tissue repair</subject><subject>Wound Healing - drug effects</subject><issn>0906-6705</issn><issn>1600-0625</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2011</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqNks2SEyEUhSlLy4mjr2CxsdzYEfqHphcurBhHq2a0_CvdUYS-nZDpwAzQk-SxdOlD-EyCHeMsZQEU_Z1zuZxGCFMypXE8X08pIyQjLK-mOaF0SmjOy-nuDpocP9xFE9IQlrGaVCfogfdrQmhd1NV9dJLTitSEsQn6Of-Y_fqO5dIa7QPWph0UeKysuQHntTXYdrjTC2cXvfTBRyJYvNnbW2fP8Hale8DJ6sctK-VA-mg2n13gK2ejc0iG0rR4a4c4BzA-CX1wYJZhlWqtQPbaLLG_1GbEUk1sb6TToILdaA8tdjL4h-heJ3sPjw7rKfryev559iY7f3_2dvbyPFNlwcoMOMSmAXLeAa3LhhHFZJ6XqlScVtAVbNEoyVjbtKRoq65kisq6oaolihTAi1P0dPSNPVwP4IOId1DQ99KAHbzgTdHwOq9pJPlIKme9d9CJK6c30u0FJSIFJ9Yi5SNSPiIFJ_4EJ3ZR-vhQZFhsoD0K_yYVgScHQHol-85Jo7T_x5Wxs6pJ3IuR28aX3f_3BcT826u0i_ps1McMYXfUS3cpWPp7xNd3Z4JffJp9KHMuyuI3cDDIkg</recordid><startdate>201109</startdate><enddate>201109</enddate><creator>Novotný, Martin</creator><creator>Vasilenko, Tomáš</creator><creator>Varinská, Lenka</creator><creator>Smetana Jr, Karel</creator><creator>Szabo, Pavol</creator><creator>Šarišský, Marek</creator><creator>Dvořánková, Barbora</creator><creator>Mojžiš, Ján</creator><creator>Bobrov, Nikita</creator><creator>Toporcerová, Silvia</creator><creator>Sabol, Franitšek</creator><creator>Matthews, Bryan J.O.</creator><creator>Gál, Peter</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><general>Blackwell</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201109</creationdate><title>ER-α agonist induces conversion of fibroblasts into myofibroblasts, while ER-β agonist increases ECM production and wound tensile strength of healing skin wounds in ovariectomised rats</title><author>Novotný, Martin ; Vasilenko, Tomáš ; Varinská, Lenka ; Smetana Jr, Karel ; Szabo, Pavol ; Šarišský, Marek ; Dvořánková, Barbora ; Mojžiš, Ján ; Bobrov, Nikita ; Toporcerová, Silvia ; Sabol, Franitšek ; Matthews, Bryan J.O. ; Gál, Peter</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4364-e8e375ee28fe174960c6a224c4c815ef36b9ca66d9d03d5f46c1a791cd0c03e83</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2011</creationdate><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>cell differentiation</topic><topic>Cell Differentiation - drug effects</topic><topic>Cells, Cultured</topic><topic>Dermatology</topic><topic>Estrogen Receptor alpha - agonists</topic><topic>Estrogen Receptor beta - agonists</topic><topic>Extracellular Matrix - drug effects</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Fibroblasts - cytology</topic><topic>Fibroblasts - drug effects</topic><topic>hormone replacement therapy</topic><topic>Human Umbilical Vein Endothelial Cells</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>In Vitro Techniques</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>myofibroblast</topic><topic>Myofibroblasts - cytology</topic><topic>Myofibroblasts - drug effects</topic><topic>Nitriles - pharmacology</topic><topic>oestrogen receptor</topic><topic>Ovariectomy</topic><topic>Phenols - pharmacology</topic><topic>Pyrazoles - pharmacology</topic><topic>Rats</topic><topic>Rats, Sprague-Dawley</topic><topic>regeneration</topic><topic>Selective Estrogen Receptor Modulators - pharmacology</topic><topic>Skin - drug effects</topic><topic>Skin - injuries</topic><topic>Skin - physiopathology</topic><topic>Tensile Strength - drug effects</topic><topic>tissue repair</topic><topic>Wound Healing - drug effects</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Novotný, Martin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vasilenko, Tomáš</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Varinská, Lenka</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Smetana Jr, Karel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Szabo, Pavol</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Šarišský, Marek</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dvořánková, Barbora</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mojžiš, Ján</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bobrov, Nikita</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Toporcerová, Silvia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sabol, Franitšek</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Matthews, Bryan J.O.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gál, Peter</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Experimental dermatology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Novotný, Martin</au><au>Vasilenko, Tomáš</au><au>Varinská, Lenka</au><au>Smetana Jr, Karel</au><au>Szabo, Pavol</au><au>Šarišský, Marek</au><au>Dvořánková, Barbora</au><au>Mojžiš, Ján</au><au>Bobrov, Nikita</au><au>Toporcerová, Silvia</au><au>Sabol, Franitšek</au><au>Matthews, Bryan J.O.</au><au>Gál, Peter</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>ER-α agonist induces conversion of fibroblasts into myofibroblasts, while ER-β agonist increases ECM production and wound tensile strength of healing skin wounds in ovariectomised rats</atitle><jtitle>Experimental dermatology</jtitle><addtitle>Exp Dermatol</addtitle><date>2011-09</date><risdate>2011</risdate><volume>20</volume><issue>9</issue><spage>703</spage><epage>708</epage><pages>703-708</pages><issn>0906-6705</issn><eissn>1600-0625</eissn><abstract>: Oestrogen deprivation is one of the major factors responsible for many age‐related processes, including poor wound healing in women. Previously, it has been shown that oestrogens have a modulatory effect in different wound‐healing models. Therefore, in this study, the effect of selective oestrogen receptor (ER) agonists (PPT – ER‐α agonist, DPN – ER‐β agonist) on excisional and incisional wound‐healing models was compared in ovariectomised rats in vivo as well as on human dermal fibroblasts (HDF) and human umbilical endothelial cells (HUVEC) in vitro. In the in vivo study, 4 months after either ovariectomy or sham ovariectomy, Sprague‐Dawley rats were randomly divided into four groups and subjected to two incisional and excisional wounds: (i) control – sham operated, vehicle‐treated; (ii) ovariectomised, vehicle‐treated; (iii) ovariectomised, PPT treated; (iv) ovariectomised, DPN treated. In the in vitro study, HDFs and HUVECs were used. After treatment with ER agonists, cells were processed for immunocytochemistry and gelatin zymography. Our study shows that stimulation of ER‐α leads to the differentiation of fibroblasts into myofibroblasts both in vivo and in vitro. On the other hand, the formation of extracellular matrix was more prominent, and wound tensile strength (TS) was increased when ER‐β was stimulated. In contrast, stimulation of ER‐α led to a more prominent increase in the expression of MMP‐2 and decrease in wound TS. New information is presented in this investigation concerning oestrogen replacement therapy (ERT) in different wound‐healing models. This study demonstrates that the ERT should be both wound and receptor‐type specific.</abstract><cop>Oxford, UK</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><pmid>21507066</pmid><doi>10.1111/j.1600-0625.2011.01284.x</doi><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0906-6705 |
ispartof | Experimental dermatology, 2011-09, Vol.20 (9), p.703-708 |
issn | 0906-6705 1600-0625 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_893987271 |
source | MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete |
subjects | Animals Biological and medical sciences cell differentiation Cell Differentiation - drug effects Cells, Cultured Dermatology Estrogen Receptor alpha - agonists Estrogen Receptor beta - agonists Extracellular Matrix - drug effects Female Fibroblasts - cytology Fibroblasts - drug effects hormone replacement therapy Human Umbilical Vein Endothelial Cells Humans In Vitro Techniques Medical sciences myofibroblast Myofibroblasts - cytology Myofibroblasts - drug effects Nitriles - pharmacology oestrogen receptor Ovariectomy Phenols - pharmacology Pyrazoles - pharmacology Rats Rats, Sprague-Dawley regeneration Selective Estrogen Receptor Modulators - pharmacology Skin - drug effects Skin - injuries Skin - physiopathology Tensile Strength - drug effects tissue repair Wound Healing - drug effects |
title | ER-α agonist induces conversion of fibroblasts into myofibroblasts, while ER-β agonist increases ECM production and wound tensile strength of healing skin wounds in ovariectomised rats |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-23T05%3A16%3A15IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=ER-%CE%B1%20agonist%20induces%20conversion%20of%20fibroblasts%20into%20myofibroblasts,%20while%20ER-%CE%B2%20agonist%20increases%20ECM%20production%20and%20wound%20tensile%20strength%20of%20healing%20skin%20wounds%20in%20ovariectomised%20rats&rft.jtitle=Experimental%20dermatology&rft.au=Novotn%C3%BD,%20Martin&rft.date=2011-09&rft.volume=20&rft.issue=9&rft.spage=703&rft.epage=708&rft.pages=703-708&rft.issn=0906-6705&rft.eissn=1600-0625&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/j.1600-0625.2011.01284.x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E893987271%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=893987271&rft_id=info:pmid/21507066&rfr_iscdi=true |