Influence of Experimental Protocols on the Mechanical Properties of the Intervertebral Disc in Unconfined Compression

The lack of standardization in experimental protocols for unconfined compression tests of intervertebral discs (IVD) tissues is a major issue in the quantification of their mechanical properties. Our hypothesis is that the experimental protocols influence the mechanical properties of both annulus fi...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of biomechanical engineering 2011-07, Vol.133 (7), p.071006-071006
Hauptverfasser: Recuerda, Maximilien, Coté, Simon-Pierre, Villemure, Isabelle, Périé, Delphine
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 071006
container_issue 7
container_start_page 071006
container_title Journal of biomechanical engineering
container_volume 133
creator Recuerda, Maximilien
Coté, Simon-Pierre
Villemure, Isabelle
Périé, Delphine
description The lack of standardization in experimental protocols for unconfined compression tests of intervertebral discs (IVD) tissues is a major issue in the quantification of their mechanical properties. Our hypothesis is that the experimental protocols influence the mechanical properties of both annulus fibrosus and nucleus pulposus. IVD extracted from bovine tails were tested in unconfined compression stress-relaxation experiments according to six different protocols, where for each protocol, the initial swelling of the samples and the applied preload were different. The Young’s modulus was calculated from a viscoelastic model, and the permeability from a linear biphasic poroviscoelastic model. Important differences were observed in the prediction of the mechanical properties of the IVD according to the initial experimental conditions, in agreement with our hypothesis. The protocol including an initial swelling, a 5% strain preload, and a 5% strain ramp is the most relevant protocol to test the annulus fibrosus in unconfined compression, and provides a permeability of 5.0 ± 4.2e−14m4/N·s and a Young’s modulus of 7.6 ± 4.7 kPa. The protocol with semi confined swelling and a 5% strain ramp is the most relevant protocol for the nucleus pulposus and provides a permeability of 10.7 ± 3.1 e−14m4/N·s and a Young’s modulus of 6.0 ± 2.5 kPa.
doi_str_mv 10.1115/1.4004411
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_893719218</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>893719218</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a366t-c7db017990a7d4327cf93cc5f3aa8b259b3a9193c8b147246b350192340fec843</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqF0c9rVDEQB_AgFrtWD54FyUXEw6uZ_NgkR1mrXajowZ5DXnZCX3kvWZP3xP73zbKrHj0FZj4zhO8Q8grYJQCoD3ApGZMS4AlZgeKmM1bBU7JiIE3HtIBz8rzWe8YAjGTPyDkHw4WWakWWbYrjgikgzZFe_d5jGSZMsx_p95LnHPJYaU50vkP6FcOdT0M49pqcB6yHsUNzm2Ysv1oN-9LAp6EGOiR6m0JOcUi4o5s87QvWOuT0gpxFP1Z8eXovyO3nqx-b6-7m25ft5uNN58V6PXdB73oG2lrm9U4KrkO0IgQVhfem58r2wltoJdOD1Fyue6EYWC4kixiMFBfk3XHvvuSfC9bZTe1fOI4-YV6qM1bo5sH8XxoDILg4yPdHGUqutWB0-xaZLw8OmDucw4E7naPZN6etSz_h7q_8k38Db0_A15ZrLD6Fof5zUq6Ntbq510fn64TuPi8ltdycVIpzIx4BHwyapA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>888113238</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Influence of Experimental Protocols on the Mechanical Properties of the Intervertebral Disc in Unconfined Compression</title><source>ASME Digital Collection Journals</source><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Recuerda, Maximilien ; Coté, Simon-Pierre ; Villemure, Isabelle ; Périé, Delphine</creator><creatorcontrib>Recuerda, Maximilien ; Coté, Simon-Pierre ; Villemure, Isabelle ; Périé, Delphine</creatorcontrib><description>The lack of standardization in experimental protocols for unconfined compression tests of intervertebral discs (IVD) tissues is a major issue in the quantification of their mechanical properties. Our hypothesis is that the experimental protocols influence the mechanical properties of both annulus fibrosus and nucleus pulposus. IVD extracted from bovine tails were tested in unconfined compression stress-relaxation experiments according to six different protocols, where for each protocol, the initial swelling of the samples and the applied preload were different. The Young’s modulus was calculated from a viscoelastic model, and the permeability from a linear biphasic poroviscoelastic model. Important differences were observed in the prediction of the mechanical properties of the IVD according to the initial experimental conditions, in agreement with our hypothesis. The protocol including an initial swelling, a 5% strain preload, and a 5% strain ramp is the most relevant protocol to test the annulus fibrosus in unconfined compression, and provides a permeability of 5.0 ± 4.2e−14m4/N·s and a Young’s modulus of 7.6 ± 4.7 kPa. The protocol with semi confined swelling and a 5% strain ramp is the most relevant protocol for the nucleus pulposus and provides a permeability of 10.7 ± 3.1 e−14m4/N·s and a Young’s modulus of 6.0 ± 2.5 kPa.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0148-0731</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1528-8951</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1115/1.4004411</identifier><identifier>PMID: 21823745</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JBENDY</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York, NY: ASME</publisher><subject>Animals ; Biological and medical sciences ; Biomechanical Phenomena ; Cattle ; Compressive Strength ; Computer Simulation ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Intervertebral Disc - physiology ; Models, Biological ; Permeability ; Research Design ; Skeleton and joints ; Stress, Mechanical ; Vertebrates: osteoarticular system, musculoskeletal system ; Weight-Bearing</subject><ispartof>Journal of biomechanical engineering, 2011-07, Vol.133 (7), p.071006-071006</ispartof><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a366t-c7db017990a7d4327cf93cc5f3aa8b259b3a9193c8b147246b350192340fec843</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a366t-c7db017990a7d4327cf93cc5f3aa8b259b3a9193c8b147246b350192340fec843</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>315,782,786,27931,27932,38527</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=24468997$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21823745$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Recuerda, Maximilien</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Coté, Simon-Pierre</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Villemure, Isabelle</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Périé, Delphine</creatorcontrib><title>Influence of Experimental Protocols on the Mechanical Properties of the Intervertebral Disc in Unconfined Compression</title><title>Journal of biomechanical engineering</title><addtitle>J Biomech Eng</addtitle><addtitle>J Biomech Eng</addtitle><description>The lack of standardization in experimental protocols for unconfined compression tests of intervertebral discs (IVD) tissues is a major issue in the quantification of their mechanical properties. Our hypothesis is that the experimental protocols influence the mechanical properties of both annulus fibrosus and nucleus pulposus. IVD extracted from bovine tails were tested in unconfined compression stress-relaxation experiments according to six different protocols, where for each protocol, the initial swelling of the samples and the applied preload were different. The Young’s modulus was calculated from a viscoelastic model, and the permeability from a linear biphasic poroviscoelastic model. Important differences were observed in the prediction of the mechanical properties of the IVD according to the initial experimental conditions, in agreement with our hypothesis. The protocol including an initial swelling, a 5% strain preload, and a 5% strain ramp is the most relevant protocol to test the annulus fibrosus in unconfined compression, and provides a permeability of 5.0 ± 4.2e−14m4/N·s and a Young’s modulus of 7.6 ± 4.7 kPa. The protocol with semi confined swelling and a 5% strain ramp is the most relevant protocol for the nucleus pulposus and provides a permeability of 10.7 ± 3.1 e−14m4/N·s and a Young’s modulus of 6.0 ± 2.5 kPa.</description><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Biomechanical Phenomena</subject><subject>Cattle</subject><subject>Compressive Strength</subject><subject>Computer Simulation</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Intervertebral Disc - physiology</subject><subject>Models, Biological</subject><subject>Permeability</subject><subject>Research Design</subject><subject>Skeleton and joints</subject><subject>Stress, Mechanical</subject><subject>Vertebrates: osteoarticular system, musculoskeletal system</subject><subject>Weight-Bearing</subject><issn>0148-0731</issn><issn>1528-8951</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2011</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqF0c9rVDEQB_AgFrtWD54FyUXEw6uZ_NgkR1mrXajowZ5DXnZCX3kvWZP3xP73zbKrHj0FZj4zhO8Q8grYJQCoD3ApGZMS4AlZgeKmM1bBU7JiIE3HtIBz8rzWe8YAjGTPyDkHw4WWakWWbYrjgikgzZFe_d5jGSZMsx_p95LnHPJYaU50vkP6FcOdT0M49pqcB6yHsUNzm2Ysv1oN-9LAp6EGOiR6m0JOcUi4o5s87QvWOuT0gpxFP1Z8eXovyO3nqx-b6-7m25ft5uNN58V6PXdB73oG2lrm9U4KrkO0IgQVhfem58r2wltoJdOD1Fyue6EYWC4kixiMFBfk3XHvvuSfC9bZTe1fOI4-YV6qM1bo5sH8XxoDILg4yPdHGUqutWB0-xaZLw8OmDucw4E7naPZN6etSz_h7q_8k38Db0_A15ZrLD6Fof5zUq6Ntbq510fn64TuPi8ltdycVIpzIx4BHwyapA</recordid><startdate>20110701</startdate><enddate>20110701</enddate><creator>Recuerda, Maximilien</creator><creator>Coté, Simon-Pierre</creator><creator>Villemure, Isabelle</creator><creator>Périé, Delphine</creator><general>ASME</general><general>American Society of Mechanical Engineers</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20110701</creationdate><title>Influence of Experimental Protocols on the Mechanical Properties of the Intervertebral Disc in Unconfined Compression</title><author>Recuerda, Maximilien ; Coté, Simon-Pierre ; Villemure, Isabelle ; Périé, Delphine</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a366t-c7db017990a7d4327cf93cc5f3aa8b259b3a9193c8b147246b350192340fec843</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2011</creationdate><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Biomechanical Phenomena</topic><topic>Cattle</topic><topic>Compressive Strength</topic><topic>Computer Simulation</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Intervertebral Disc - physiology</topic><topic>Models, Biological</topic><topic>Permeability</topic><topic>Research Design</topic><topic>Skeleton and joints</topic><topic>Stress, Mechanical</topic><topic>Vertebrates: osteoarticular system, musculoskeletal system</topic><topic>Weight-Bearing</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Recuerda, Maximilien</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Coté, Simon-Pierre</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Villemure, Isabelle</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Périé, Delphine</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of biomechanical engineering</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Recuerda, Maximilien</au><au>Coté, Simon-Pierre</au><au>Villemure, Isabelle</au><au>Périé, Delphine</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Influence of Experimental Protocols on the Mechanical Properties of the Intervertebral Disc in Unconfined Compression</atitle><jtitle>Journal of biomechanical engineering</jtitle><stitle>J Biomech Eng</stitle><addtitle>J Biomech Eng</addtitle><date>2011-07-01</date><risdate>2011</risdate><volume>133</volume><issue>7</issue><spage>071006</spage><epage>071006</epage><pages>071006-071006</pages><issn>0148-0731</issn><eissn>1528-8951</eissn><coden>JBENDY</coden><abstract>The lack of standardization in experimental protocols for unconfined compression tests of intervertebral discs (IVD) tissues is a major issue in the quantification of their mechanical properties. Our hypothesis is that the experimental protocols influence the mechanical properties of both annulus fibrosus and nucleus pulposus. IVD extracted from bovine tails were tested in unconfined compression stress-relaxation experiments according to six different protocols, where for each protocol, the initial swelling of the samples and the applied preload were different. The Young’s modulus was calculated from a viscoelastic model, and the permeability from a linear biphasic poroviscoelastic model. Important differences were observed in the prediction of the mechanical properties of the IVD according to the initial experimental conditions, in agreement with our hypothesis. The protocol including an initial swelling, a 5% strain preload, and a 5% strain ramp is the most relevant protocol to test the annulus fibrosus in unconfined compression, and provides a permeability of 5.0 ± 4.2e−14m4/N·s and a Young’s modulus of 7.6 ± 4.7 kPa. The protocol with semi confined swelling and a 5% strain ramp is the most relevant protocol for the nucleus pulposus and provides a permeability of 10.7 ± 3.1 e−14m4/N·s and a Young’s modulus of 6.0 ± 2.5 kPa.</abstract><cop>New York, NY</cop><pub>ASME</pub><pmid>21823745</pmid><doi>10.1115/1.4004411</doi><tpages>1</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0148-0731
ispartof Journal of biomechanical engineering, 2011-07, Vol.133 (7), p.071006-071006
issn 0148-0731
1528-8951
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_893719218
source ASME Digital Collection Journals; MEDLINE; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Animals
Biological and medical sciences
Biomechanical Phenomena
Cattle
Compressive Strength
Computer Simulation
Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology
Intervertebral Disc - physiology
Models, Biological
Permeability
Research Design
Skeleton and joints
Stress, Mechanical
Vertebrates: osteoarticular system, musculoskeletal system
Weight-Bearing
title Influence of Experimental Protocols on the Mechanical Properties of the Intervertebral Disc in Unconfined Compression
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-04T22%3A21%3A47IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Influence%20of%20Experimental%20Protocols%20on%20the%20Mechanical%20Properties%20of%20the%20Intervertebral%20Disc%20in%20Unconfined%20Compression&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20biomechanical%20engineering&rft.au=Recuerda,%20Maximilien&rft.date=2011-07-01&rft.volume=133&rft.issue=7&rft.spage=071006&rft.epage=071006&rft.pages=071006-071006&rft.issn=0148-0731&rft.eissn=1528-8951&rft.coden=JBENDY&rft_id=info:doi/10.1115/1.4004411&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E893719218%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=888113238&rft_id=info:pmid/21823745&rfr_iscdi=true