Relative Susceptibility of Two Sweetpotato Varieties to Storage Root Damage by Sweetpotato Flea Beetle (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae) and Wireworm (Coleoptera: Elateridae)
The feeding of soil dwelling insects on storage roots is one of the most serious management issues faced by sweetpotato, Ipomoea batatas (L.) Lam. (Convolvulaceae), growers in the southern United States. Field studies were conducted to evaluate the relative susceptibility of two commonly grown sweet...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of economic entomology 2011-02, Vol.104 (1), p.143-148 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 148 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 143 |
container_title | Journal of economic entomology |
container_volume | 104 |
creator | Abney, Mark R. Kennedy, George G. |
description | The feeding of soil dwelling insects on storage roots is one of the most serious management issues faced by sweetpotato, Ipomoea batatas (L.) Lam. (Convolvulaceae), growers in the southern United States. Field studies were conducted to evaluate the relative susceptibility of two commonly grown sweetpotato varieties to sweetpotato flea beetle, Chaetocnema confinis Crotch (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae), and wireworms (Coleoptera: Elateridae, various species). The incidence and severity of sweetpotato flea beetle damage was significantly lower in the variety Covington than Beauregard in two small plot replicated studies. Surveys conducted in commercial sweetpotato fields also showed significantly less sweetpotato flea beetle damage in fields planted to Covington compared with those planted to Beauregard. There was no clear evidence of varietal effect on the incidence of wireworm damage in the study. Results indicate that the severity of wireworm damage as measured by the size of feeding scars may be less in Covington than Beauregard. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1603/EC10196 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_893310889</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>893310889</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-b462t-7fdcc94fe850c7810007acf55fc6e918415c383e72faef56251c2f6a6fcc4f753</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqF0c1uEzEQB_AVAtFQEG8AviDgsODPXS83WFJAqoTUtMBtNXHGxcgbL7ZDlDfiMXFpIOoBcZoZ6afRaP5V9ZDRF6yh4uW8Z5R1za1qxjqha96xL7erGaWc11R24qi6l9I3SlnDGb1bHXEmqdSKzaqfZ-ghux9IFptkcMpu6bzLOxIsOd8Gstgi5ilkyIF8gugwO0ykDIscIlwiOQshk7cwXvXL3Q1_4hHImzJ7JM_64DFMGSO8Iv3XuEthRO9WgM8JrFfks4u4DXG8CeflNoy_1f3qjgWf8MG-HlcXJ_Pz_n19-vHdh_71ab2UDc91a1fGdNKiVtS0mlFKWzBWKWsa7JiWTBmhBbbcAlrVcMUMtw001hhpWyWOq6fXe6cYvm8w5WF05THewxrDJg26E4JRXcp_pWql5lLpgzQxpBTRDlN0I8TdwOhwld-wz6_IR_udm-WIq7_uT2AFPNkDSAa8jbA2Lh2c0JJ3Shb3-NpZCANcxmIuFpwyVR5CmWDdYdPShbDGf570C8r1uLs</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>857482458</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Relative Susceptibility of Two Sweetpotato Varieties to Storage Root Damage by Sweetpotato Flea Beetle (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae) and Wireworm (Coleoptera: Elateridae)</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>BioOne Complete</source><source>Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current)</source><creator>Abney, Mark R. ; Kennedy, George G.</creator><creatorcontrib>Abney, Mark R. ; Kennedy, George G.</creatorcontrib><description>The feeding of soil dwelling insects on storage roots is one of the most serious management issues faced by sweetpotato, Ipomoea batatas (L.) Lam. (Convolvulaceae), growers in the southern United States. Field studies were conducted to evaluate the relative susceptibility of two commonly grown sweetpotato varieties to sweetpotato flea beetle, Chaetocnema confinis Crotch (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae), and wireworms (Coleoptera: Elateridae, various species). The incidence and severity of sweetpotato flea beetle damage was significantly lower in the variety Covington than Beauregard in two small plot replicated studies. Surveys conducted in commercial sweetpotato fields also showed significantly less sweetpotato flea beetle damage in fields planted to Covington compared with those planted to Beauregard. There was no clear evidence of varietal effect on the incidence of wireworm damage in the study. Results indicate that the severity of wireworm damage as measured by the size of feeding scars may be less in Covington than Beauregard.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-0493</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1938-291X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 0022-0493</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1603/EC10196</identifier><identifier>PMID: 21404851</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JEENAI</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Lanham, MD: Entomological Society of America</publisher><subject>Animals ; Biological and medical sciences ; Chaetocnema confinis ; Chrysomelidae ; Coleoptera ; Coleoptera - physiology ; Control ; Convolvulaceae ; Elateridae ; Feeding ; FIELD AND FORAGE CROPS ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Generalities ; growers ; host plant resistance ; Host-Parasite Interactions ; Insecta ; insects ; Invertebrates ; Ipomoea batatas ; Ipomoea batatas - parasitology ; Larva - physiology ; Phytopathology. Animal pests. Plant and forest protection ; Plant Tubers - parasitology ; planting ; Protozoa. Invertebrates ; Roots ; Soil ; Species Specificity ; surveys ; sweet potatoes ; sweetpotato ; sweetpotato flea beetle ; wireworm</subject><ispartof>Journal of economic entomology, 2011-02, Vol.104 (1), p.143-148</ispartof><rights>2011 Entomological Society of America</rights><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-b462t-7fdcc94fe850c7810007acf55fc6e918415c383e72faef56251c2f6a6fcc4f753</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-b462t-7fdcc94fe850c7810007acf55fc6e918415c383e72faef56251c2f6a6fcc4f753</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://bioone.org/doi/pdf/10.1603/EC10196$$EPDF$$P50$$Gbioone$$H</linktopdf><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,26978,27924,27925,52363</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=23842954$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21404851$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Abney, Mark R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kennedy, George G.</creatorcontrib><title>Relative Susceptibility of Two Sweetpotato Varieties to Storage Root Damage by Sweetpotato Flea Beetle (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae) and Wireworm (Coleoptera: Elateridae)</title><title>Journal of economic entomology</title><addtitle>J Econ Entomol</addtitle><description>The feeding of soil dwelling insects on storage roots is one of the most serious management issues faced by sweetpotato, Ipomoea batatas (L.) Lam. (Convolvulaceae), growers in the southern United States. Field studies were conducted to evaluate the relative susceptibility of two commonly grown sweetpotato varieties to sweetpotato flea beetle, Chaetocnema confinis Crotch (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae), and wireworms (Coleoptera: Elateridae, various species). The incidence and severity of sweetpotato flea beetle damage was significantly lower in the variety Covington than Beauregard in two small plot replicated studies. Surveys conducted in commercial sweetpotato fields also showed significantly less sweetpotato flea beetle damage in fields planted to Covington compared with those planted to Beauregard. There was no clear evidence of varietal effect on the incidence of wireworm damage in the study. Results indicate that the severity of wireworm damage as measured by the size of feeding scars may be less in Covington than Beauregard.</description><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Chaetocnema confinis</subject><subject>Chrysomelidae</subject><subject>Coleoptera</subject><subject>Coleoptera - physiology</subject><subject>Control</subject><subject>Convolvulaceae</subject><subject>Elateridae</subject><subject>Feeding</subject><subject>FIELD AND FORAGE CROPS</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Generalities</subject><subject>growers</subject><subject>host plant resistance</subject><subject>Host-Parasite Interactions</subject><subject>Insecta</subject><subject>insects</subject><subject>Invertebrates</subject><subject>Ipomoea batatas</subject><subject>Ipomoea batatas - parasitology</subject><subject>Larva - physiology</subject><subject>Phytopathology. Animal pests. Plant and forest protection</subject><subject>Plant Tubers - parasitology</subject><subject>planting</subject><subject>Protozoa. Invertebrates</subject><subject>Roots</subject><subject>Soil</subject><subject>Species Specificity</subject><subject>surveys</subject><subject>sweet potatoes</subject><subject>sweetpotato</subject><subject>sweetpotato flea beetle</subject><subject>wireworm</subject><issn>0022-0493</issn><issn>1938-291X</issn><issn>0022-0493</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2011</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqF0c1uEzEQB_AVAtFQEG8AviDgsODPXS83WFJAqoTUtMBtNXHGxcgbL7ZDlDfiMXFpIOoBcZoZ6afRaP5V9ZDRF6yh4uW8Z5R1za1qxjqha96xL7erGaWc11R24qi6l9I3SlnDGb1bHXEmqdSKzaqfZ-ghux9IFptkcMpu6bzLOxIsOd8Gstgi5ilkyIF8gugwO0ykDIscIlwiOQshk7cwXvXL3Q1_4hHImzJ7JM_64DFMGSO8Iv3XuEthRO9WgM8JrFfks4u4DXG8CeflNoy_1f3qjgWf8MG-HlcXJ_Pz_n19-vHdh_71ab2UDc91a1fGdNKiVtS0mlFKWzBWKWsa7JiWTBmhBbbcAlrVcMUMtw001hhpWyWOq6fXe6cYvm8w5WF05THewxrDJg26E4JRXcp_pWql5lLpgzQxpBTRDlN0I8TdwOhwld-wz6_IR_udm-WIq7_uT2AFPNkDSAa8jbA2Lh2c0JJ3Shb3-NpZCANcxmIuFpwyVR5CmWDdYdPShbDGf570C8r1uLs</recordid><startdate>20110201</startdate><enddate>20110201</enddate><creator>Abney, Mark R.</creator><creator>Kennedy, George G.</creator><general>Entomological Society of America</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>7SS</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20110201</creationdate><title>Relative Susceptibility of Two Sweetpotato Varieties to Storage Root Damage by Sweetpotato Flea Beetle (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae) and Wireworm (Coleoptera: Elateridae)</title><author>Abney, Mark R. ; Kennedy, George G.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b462t-7fdcc94fe850c7810007acf55fc6e918415c383e72faef56251c2f6a6fcc4f753</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2011</creationdate><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Chaetocnema confinis</topic><topic>Chrysomelidae</topic><topic>Coleoptera</topic><topic>Coleoptera - physiology</topic><topic>Control</topic><topic>Convolvulaceae</topic><topic>Elateridae</topic><topic>Feeding</topic><topic>FIELD AND FORAGE CROPS</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Generalities</topic><topic>growers</topic><topic>host plant resistance</topic><topic>Host-Parasite Interactions</topic><topic>Insecta</topic><topic>insects</topic><topic>Invertebrates</topic><topic>Ipomoea batatas</topic><topic>Ipomoea batatas - parasitology</topic><topic>Larva - physiology</topic><topic>Phytopathology. Animal pests. Plant and forest protection</topic><topic>Plant Tubers - parasitology</topic><topic>planting</topic><topic>Protozoa. Invertebrates</topic><topic>Roots</topic><topic>Soil</topic><topic>Species Specificity</topic><topic>surveys</topic><topic>sweet potatoes</topic><topic>sweetpotato</topic><topic>sweetpotato flea beetle</topic><topic>wireworm</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Abney, Mark R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kennedy, George G.</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><jtitle>Journal of economic entomology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Abney, Mark R.</au><au>Kennedy, George G.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Relative Susceptibility of Two Sweetpotato Varieties to Storage Root Damage by Sweetpotato Flea Beetle (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae) and Wireworm (Coleoptera: Elateridae)</atitle><jtitle>Journal of economic entomology</jtitle><addtitle>J Econ Entomol</addtitle><date>2011-02-01</date><risdate>2011</risdate><volume>104</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>143</spage><epage>148</epage><pages>143-148</pages><issn>0022-0493</issn><eissn>1938-291X</eissn><eissn>0022-0493</eissn><coden>JEENAI</coden><abstract>The feeding of soil dwelling insects on storage roots is one of the most serious management issues faced by sweetpotato, Ipomoea batatas (L.) Lam. (Convolvulaceae), growers in the southern United States. Field studies were conducted to evaluate the relative susceptibility of two commonly grown sweetpotato varieties to sweetpotato flea beetle, Chaetocnema confinis Crotch (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae), and wireworms (Coleoptera: Elateridae, various species). The incidence and severity of sweetpotato flea beetle damage was significantly lower in the variety Covington than Beauregard in two small plot replicated studies. Surveys conducted in commercial sweetpotato fields also showed significantly less sweetpotato flea beetle damage in fields planted to Covington compared with those planted to Beauregard. There was no clear evidence of varietal effect on the incidence of wireworm damage in the study. Results indicate that the severity of wireworm damage as measured by the size of feeding scars may be less in Covington than Beauregard.</abstract><cop>Lanham, MD</cop><pub>Entomological Society of America</pub><pmid>21404851</pmid><doi>10.1603/EC10196</doi><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0022-0493 |
ispartof | Journal of economic entomology, 2011-02, Vol.104 (1), p.143-148 |
issn | 0022-0493 1938-291X 0022-0493 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_893310889 |
source | MEDLINE; BioOne Complete; Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current) |
subjects | Animals Biological and medical sciences Chaetocnema confinis Chrysomelidae Coleoptera Coleoptera - physiology Control Convolvulaceae Elateridae Feeding FIELD AND FORAGE CROPS Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology Generalities growers host plant resistance Host-Parasite Interactions Insecta insects Invertebrates Ipomoea batatas Ipomoea batatas - parasitology Larva - physiology Phytopathology. Animal pests. Plant and forest protection Plant Tubers - parasitology planting Protozoa. Invertebrates Roots Soil Species Specificity surveys sweet potatoes sweetpotato sweetpotato flea beetle wireworm |
title | Relative Susceptibility of Two Sweetpotato Varieties to Storage Root Damage by Sweetpotato Flea Beetle (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae) and Wireworm (Coleoptera: Elateridae) |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-21T16%3A07%3A21IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Relative%20Susceptibility%20of%20Two%20Sweetpotato%20Varieties%20to%20Storage%20Root%20Damage%20by%20Sweetpotato%20Flea%20Beetle%20(Coleoptera:%20Chrysomelidae)%20and%20Wireworm%20(Coleoptera:%20Elateridae)&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20economic%20entomology&rft.au=Abney,%20Mark%20R.&rft.date=2011-02-01&rft.volume=104&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=143&rft.epage=148&rft.pages=143-148&rft.issn=0022-0493&rft.eissn=1938-291X&rft.coden=JEENAI&rft_id=info:doi/10.1603/EC10196&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E893310889%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=857482458&rft_id=info:pmid/21404851&rfr_iscdi=true |