Relative Susceptibility of Two Sweetpotato Varieties to Storage Root Damage by Sweetpotato Flea Beetle (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae) and Wireworm (Coleoptera: Elateridae)

The feeding of soil dwelling insects on storage roots is one of the most serious management issues faced by sweetpotato, Ipomoea batatas (L.) Lam. (Convolvulaceae), growers in the southern United States. Field studies were conducted to evaluate the relative susceptibility of two commonly grown sweet...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of economic entomology 2011-02, Vol.104 (1), p.143-148
Hauptverfasser: Abney, Mark R., Kennedy, George G.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 148
container_issue 1
container_start_page 143
container_title Journal of economic entomology
container_volume 104
creator Abney, Mark R.
Kennedy, George G.
description The feeding of soil dwelling insects on storage roots is one of the most serious management issues faced by sweetpotato, Ipomoea batatas (L.) Lam. (Convolvulaceae), growers in the southern United States. Field studies were conducted to evaluate the relative susceptibility of two commonly grown sweetpotato varieties to sweetpotato flea beetle, Chaetocnema confinis Crotch (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae), and wireworms (Coleoptera: Elateridae, various species). The incidence and severity of sweetpotato flea beetle damage was significantly lower in the variety Covington than Beauregard in two small plot replicated studies. Surveys conducted in commercial sweetpotato fields also showed significantly less sweetpotato flea beetle damage in fields planted to Covington compared with those planted to Beauregard. There was no clear evidence of varietal effect on the incidence of wireworm damage in the study. Results indicate that the severity of wireworm damage as measured by the size of feeding scars may be less in Covington than Beauregard.
doi_str_mv 10.1603/EC10196
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_893310889</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>893310889</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-b462t-7fdcc94fe850c7810007acf55fc6e918415c383e72faef56251c2f6a6fcc4f753</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqF0c1uEzEQB_AVAtFQEG8AviDgsODPXS83WFJAqoTUtMBtNXHGxcgbL7ZDlDfiMXFpIOoBcZoZ6afRaP5V9ZDRF6yh4uW8Z5R1za1qxjqha96xL7erGaWc11R24qi6l9I3SlnDGb1bHXEmqdSKzaqfZ-ghux9IFptkcMpu6bzLOxIsOd8Gstgi5ilkyIF8gugwO0ykDIscIlwiOQshk7cwXvXL3Q1_4hHImzJ7JM_64DFMGSO8Iv3XuEthRO9WgM8JrFfks4u4DXG8CeflNoy_1f3qjgWf8MG-HlcXJ_Pz_n19-vHdh_71ab2UDc91a1fGdNKiVtS0mlFKWzBWKWsa7JiWTBmhBbbcAlrVcMUMtw001hhpWyWOq6fXe6cYvm8w5WF05THewxrDJg26E4JRXcp_pWql5lLpgzQxpBTRDlN0I8TdwOhwld-wz6_IR_udm-WIq7_uT2AFPNkDSAa8jbA2Lh2c0JJ3Shb3-NpZCANcxmIuFpwyVR5CmWDdYdPShbDGf570C8r1uLs</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>857482458</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Relative Susceptibility of Two Sweetpotato Varieties to Storage Root Damage by Sweetpotato Flea Beetle (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae) and Wireworm (Coleoptera: Elateridae)</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>BioOne Complete</source><source>Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current)</source><creator>Abney, Mark R. ; Kennedy, George G.</creator><creatorcontrib>Abney, Mark R. ; Kennedy, George G.</creatorcontrib><description>The feeding of soil dwelling insects on storage roots is one of the most serious management issues faced by sweetpotato, Ipomoea batatas (L.) Lam. (Convolvulaceae), growers in the southern United States. Field studies were conducted to evaluate the relative susceptibility of two commonly grown sweetpotato varieties to sweetpotato flea beetle, Chaetocnema confinis Crotch (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae), and wireworms (Coleoptera: Elateridae, various species). The incidence and severity of sweetpotato flea beetle damage was significantly lower in the variety Covington than Beauregard in two small plot replicated studies. Surveys conducted in commercial sweetpotato fields also showed significantly less sweetpotato flea beetle damage in fields planted to Covington compared with those planted to Beauregard. There was no clear evidence of varietal effect on the incidence of wireworm damage in the study. Results indicate that the severity of wireworm damage as measured by the size of feeding scars may be less in Covington than Beauregard.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-0493</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1938-291X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 0022-0493</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1603/EC10196</identifier><identifier>PMID: 21404851</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JEENAI</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Lanham, MD: Entomological Society of America</publisher><subject>Animals ; Biological and medical sciences ; Chaetocnema confinis ; Chrysomelidae ; Coleoptera ; Coleoptera - physiology ; Control ; Convolvulaceae ; Elateridae ; Feeding ; FIELD AND FORAGE CROPS ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Generalities ; growers ; host plant resistance ; Host-Parasite Interactions ; Insecta ; insects ; Invertebrates ; Ipomoea batatas ; Ipomoea batatas - parasitology ; Larva - physiology ; Phytopathology. Animal pests. Plant and forest protection ; Plant Tubers - parasitology ; planting ; Protozoa. Invertebrates ; Roots ; Soil ; Species Specificity ; surveys ; sweet potatoes ; sweetpotato ; sweetpotato flea beetle ; wireworm</subject><ispartof>Journal of economic entomology, 2011-02, Vol.104 (1), p.143-148</ispartof><rights>2011 Entomological Society of America</rights><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-b462t-7fdcc94fe850c7810007acf55fc6e918415c383e72faef56251c2f6a6fcc4f753</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-b462t-7fdcc94fe850c7810007acf55fc6e918415c383e72faef56251c2f6a6fcc4f753</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://bioone.org/doi/pdf/10.1603/EC10196$$EPDF$$P50$$Gbioone$$H</linktopdf><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,26978,27924,27925,52363</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=23842954$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21404851$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Abney, Mark R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kennedy, George G.</creatorcontrib><title>Relative Susceptibility of Two Sweetpotato Varieties to Storage Root Damage by Sweetpotato Flea Beetle (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae) and Wireworm (Coleoptera: Elateridae)</title><title>Journal of economic entomology</title><addtitle>J Econ Entomol</addtitle><description>The feeding of soil dwelling insects on storage roots is one of the most serious management issues faced by sweetpotato, Ipomoea batatas (L.) Lam. (Convolvulaceae), growers in the southern United States. Field studies were conducted to evaluate the relative susceptibility of two commonly grown sweetpotato varieties to sweetpotato flea beetle, Chaetocnema confinis Crotch (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae), and wireworms (Coleoptera: Elateridae, various species). The incidence and severity of sweetpotato flea beetle damage was significantly lower in the variety Covington than Beauregard in two small plot replicated studies. Surveys conducted in commercial sweetpotato fields also showed significantly less sweetpotato flea beetle damage in fields planted to Covington compared with those planted to Beauregard. There was no clear evidence of varietal effect on the incidence of wireworm damage in the study. Results indicate that the severity of wireworm damage as measured by the size of feeding scars may be less in Covington than Beauregard.</description><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Chaetocnema confinis</subject><subject>Chrysomelidae</subject><subject>Coleoptera</subject><subject>Coleoptera - physiology</subject><subject>Control</subject><subject>Convolvulaceae</subject><subject>Elateridae</subject><subject>Feeding</subject><subject>FIELD AND FORAGE CROPS</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Generalities</subject><subject>growers</subject><subject>host plant resistance</subject><subject>Host-Parasite Interactions</subject><subject>Insecta</subject><subject>insects</subject><subject>Invertebrates</subject><subject>Ipomoea batatas</subject><subject>Ipomoea batatas - parasitology</subject><subject>Larva - physiology</subject><subject>Phytopathology. Animal pests. Plant and forest protection</subject><subject>Plant Tubers - parasitology</subject><subject>planting</subject><subject>Protozoa. Invertebrates</subject><subject>Roots</subject><subject>Soil</subject><subject>Species Specificity</subject><subject>surveys</subject><subject>sweet potatoes</subject><subject>sweetpotato</subject><subject>sweetpotato flea beetle</subject><subject>wireworm</subject><issn>0022-0493</issn><issn>1938-291X</issn><issn>0022-0493</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2011</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqF0c1uEzEQB_AVAtFQEG8AviDgsODPXS83WFJAqoTUtMBtNXHGxcgbL7ZDlDfiMXFpIOoBcZoZ6afRaP5V9ZDRF6yh4uW8Z5R1za1qxjqha96xL7erGaWc11R24qi6l9I3SlnDGb1bHXEmqdSKzaqfZ-ghux9IFptkcMpu6bzLOxIsOd8Gstgi5ilkyIF8gugwO0ykDIscIlwiOQshk7cwXvXL3Q1_4hHImzJ7JM_64DFMGSO8Iv3XuEthRO9WgM8JrFfks4u4DXG8CeflNoy_1f3qjgWf8MG-HlcXJ_Pz_n19-vHdh_71ab2UDc91a1fGdNKiVtS0mlFKWzBWKWsa7JiWTBmhBbbcAlrVcMUMtw001hhpWyWOq6fXe6cYvm8w5WF05THewxrDJg26E4JRXcp_pWql5lLpgzQxpBTRDlN0I8TdwOhwld-wz6_IR_udm-WIq7_uT2AFPNkDSAa8jbA2Lh2c0JJ3Shb3-NpZCANcxmIuFpwyVR5CmWDdYdPShbDGf570C8r1uLs</recordid><startdate>20110201</startdate><enddate>20110201</enddate><creator>Abney, Mark R.</creator><creator>Kennedy, George G.</creator><general>Entomological Society of America</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>7SS</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20110201</creationdate><title>Relative Susceptibility of Two Sweetpotato Varieties to Storage Root Damage by Sweetpotato Flea Beetle (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae) and Wireworm (Coleoptera: Elateridae)</title><author>Abney, Mark R. ; Kennedy, George G.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b462t-7fdcc94fe850c7810007acf55fc6e918415c383e72faef56251c2f6a6fcc4f753</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2011</creationdate><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Chaetocnema confinis</topic><topic>Chrysomelidae</topic><topic>Coleoptera</topic><topic>Coleoptera - physiology</topic><topic>Control</topic><topic>Convolvulaceae</topic><topic>Elateridae</topic><topic>Feeding</topic><topic>FIELD AND FORAGE CROPS</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Generalities</topic><topic>growers</topic><topic>host plant resistance</topic><topic>Host-Parasite Interactions</topic><topic>Insecta</topic><topic>insects</topic><topic>Invertebrates</topic><topic>Ipomoea batatas</topic><topic>Ipomoea batatas - parasitology</topic><topic>Larva - physiology</topic><topic>Phytopathology. Animal pests. Plant and forest protection</topic><topic>Plant Tubers - parasitology</topic><topic>planting</topic><topic>Protozoa. Invertebrates</topic><topic>Roots</topic><topic>Soil</topic><topic>Species Specificity</topic><topic>surveys</topic><topic>sweet potatoes</topic><topic>sweetpotato</topic><topic>sweetpotato flea beetle</topic><topic>wireworm</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Abney, Mark R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kennedy, George G.</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><jtitle>Journal of economic entomology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Abney, Mark R.</au><au>Kennedy, George G.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Relative Susceptibility of Two Sweetpotato Varieties to Storage Root Damage by Sweetpotato Flea Beetle (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae) and Wireworm (Coleoptera: Elateridae)</atitle><jtitle>Journal of economic entomology</jtitle><addtitle>J Econ Entomol</addtitle><date>2011-02-01</date><risdate>2011</risdate><volume>104</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>143</spage><epage>148</epage><pages>143-148</pages><issn>0022-0493</issn><eissn>1938-291X</eissn><eissn>0022-0493</eissn><coden>JEENAI</coden><abstract>The feeding of soil dwelling insects on storage roots is one of the most serious management issues faced by sweetpotato, Ipomoea batatas (L.) Lam. (Convolvulaceae), growers in the southern United States. Field studies were conducted to evaluate the relative susceptibility of two commonly grown sweetpotato varieties to sweetpotato flea beetle, Chaetocnema confinis Crotch (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae), and wireworms (Coleoptera: Elateridae, various species). The incidence and severity of sweetpotato flea beetle damage was significantly lower in the variety Covington than Beauregard in two small plot replicated studies. Surveys conducted in commercial sweetpotato fields also showed significantly less sweetpotato flea beetle damage in fields planted to Covington compared with those planted to Beauregard. There was no clear evidence of varietal effect on the incidence of wireworm damage in the study. Results indicate that the severity of wireworm damage as measured by the size of feeding scars may be less in Covington than Beauregard.</abstract><cop>Lanham, MD</cop><pub>Entomological Society of America</pub><pmid>21404851</pmid><doi>10.1603/EC10196</doi><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0022-0493
ispartof Journal of economic entomology, 2011-02, Vol.104 (1), p.143-148
issn 0022-0493
1938-291X
0022-0493
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_893310889
source MEDLINE; BioOne Complete; Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current)
subjects Animals
Biological and medical sciences
Chaetocnema confinis
Chrysomelidae
Coleoptera
Coleoptera - physiology
Control
Convolvulaceae
Elateridae
Feeding
FIELD AND FORAGE CROPS
Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology
Generalities
growers
host plant resistance
Host-Parasite Interactions
Insecta
insects
Invertebrates
Ipomoea batatas
Ipomoea batatas - parasitology
Larva - physiology
Phytopathology. Animal pests. Plant and forest protection
Plant Tubers - parasitology
planting
Protozoa. Invertebrates
Roots
Soil
Species Specificity
surveys
sweet potatoes
sweetpotato
sweetpotato flea beetle
wireworm
title Relative Susceptibility of Two Sweetpotato Varieties to Storage Root Damage by Sweetpotato Flea Beetle (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae) and Wireworm (Coleoptera: Elateridae)
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-21T16%3A07%3A21IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Relative%20Susceptibility%20of%20Two%20Sweetpotato%20Varieties%20to%20Storage%20Root%20Damage%20by%20Sweetpotato%20Flea%20Beetle%20(Coleoptera:%20Chrysomelidae)%20and%20Wireworm%20(Coleoptera:%20Elateridae)&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20economic%20entomology&rft.au=Abney,%20Mark%20R.&rft.date=2011-02-01&rft.volume=104&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=143&rft.epage=148&rft.pages=143-148&rft.issn=0022-0493&rft.eissn=1938-291X&rft.coden=JEENAI&rft_id=info:doi/10.1603/EC10196&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E893310889%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=857482458&rft_id=info:pmid/21404851&rfr_iscdi=true