A comparative study of 200 head and neck FNAs performed by a cytopathologist with versus without ultrasound guidance: Evidence for improved diagnostic value with ultrasound guidance

Our previous study showed that the sensitivity of head and neck fine‐needle aspiration (FNA) procedures was significantly better in the cytopathologist‐performed group than in the noncytopathologist‐performed group (96 versus 67%). Recently, cytopathologists have learned to use ultrasound machines t...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Diagnostic cytopathology 2011-10, Vol.39 (10), p.743-751
1. Verfasser: Wu, Maoxin
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 751
container_issue 10
container_start_page 743
container_title Diagnostic cytopathology
container_volume 39
creator Wu, Maoxin
description Our previous study showed that the sensitivity of head and neck fine‐needle aspiration (FNA) procedures was significantly better in the cytopathologist‐performed group than in the noncytopathologist‐performed group (96 versus 67%). Recently, cytopathologists have learned to use ultrasound machines to assist them in performing FNA procedures. This study was designed to assess whether cytopathologist‐performed FNAs with ultrasound guidance can improve diagnostic value in comparison to those done without ultrasound guidance. Two hundred consecutive head and neck FNA cases performed by the same cytopathologist with and without ultrasound guidance were reviewed. Cases consisted of 100 ultrasound‐guided FNAs (USGFNAs) performed between July 2008 and March 2009 and 100 palpation‐guided FNAs (PGFNAs) performed before July 2008. These cases were correlated with follow‐up surgical diagnosis. The diagnostic, suspicious/atypical/suggestive, and nondiagnostic rates (%) for the head and neck FNAs were 83 versus 86, 10 versus 13, and 7 versus 1 in PGFNA group versus USGFNA group, respectively. Surgical follow‐up specimens were found in 50 PGFNAs versus 35 USGFNAs. The true‐positive, true‐negative, false‐positive, and false‐negative rates (%) were 92, 2, 2, and 4 versus 80, 17, 3, and 0 in PGFNAs versus USGFNAs, respectively. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), and accuracy were 96, 50, 98, 33, and 94% in PGFNAs versus 100, 86, 97, 100, and 97% in the USGFNA group, respectively. This study also shows increased FNAs of thyroid and salivary glands and other smaller nonpalpable lesions with ultrasound guidance. USGFNAs performed by a cytopathologist could significantly improve the specificity and NPV (P = 0.04) while preserving virtually the same excellent sensitivity and PPV as those of PGFNAs. With ultrasound guidance, a cytopathologist will be able to perform FNAs in smaller, nonpalpable lesions and target complex lesions with confidence and accuracy, thus achieving a better outcome. Diagn. Cytopathol. 2010. © 2010 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.
doi_str_mv 10.1002/dc.21460
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_890671217</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>890671217</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3580-2b13d176bd3bc6d843d375fe4350e824723fd80ec8fc6e2789e6c814b8c6a43f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kcFu1DAQhi0EoktB4gmQb3BJseMkdritlnZbVBWBQCAulmNPdk2zcWrHKXkw3g_T3fYEp_kPnz7NzI_QS0pOKCH5W6NPclpU5BFaUFLzjDBWP0YLwcsyo4TVR-hZCD8JIXVOq6foKCd1URecLNDvJdZuNyivRjsBDmM0M3YtzgnBW1AGq97gHvQ1PrtaBjyAb53fgcHNjBXW8-gGNW5d5zY2jPjWjls8gQ8x3GUXRxy70avgYvJsojWq1_AOn07WQEo42bDdDd5NyWms2vQujFbjSXUR9r5_CJ6jJ63qArw4zGP09ez0y-o8u_y4vlgtLzPNSkGyvKHMUF41hjW6MqJghvGyhYKVBERe8Jy1RhDQotUV5FzUUGlBi0boShWsZcfo9d6bFryJEEa5s0FD16keXAxS1KTiNKc8kW_2pPYuBA-tHLzdKT9LSuTfjqTR8q6jhL46SGOTPvkA3peSgGwP3NoO5v-K5PvVvfDApwrg1wOv_LWseDpYfrtayw_fP_9Yi-KT5OwPOp6s1g</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>890671217</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A comparative study of 200 head and neck FNAs performed by a cytopathologist with versus without ultrasound guidance: Evidence for improved diagnostic value with ultrasound guidance</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library All Journals</source><creator>Wu, Maoxin</creator><creatorcontrib>Wu, Maoxin</creatorcontrib><description>Our previous study showed that the sensitivity of head and neck fine‐needle aspiration (FNA) procedures was significantly better in the cytopathologist‐performed group than in the noncytopathologist‐performed group (96 versus 67%). Recently, cytopathologists have learned to use ultrasound machines to assist them in performing FNA procedures. This study was designed to assess whether cytopathologist‐performed FNAs with ultrasound guidance can improve diagnostic value in comparison to those done without ultrasound guidance. Two hundred consecutive head and neck FNA cases performed by the same cytopathologist with and without ultrasound guidance were reviewed. Cases consisted of 100 ultrasound‐guided FNAs (USGFNAs) performed between July 2008 and March 2009 and 100 palpation‐guided FNAs (PGFNAs) performed before July 2008. These cases were correlated with follow‐up surgical diagnosis. The diagnostic, suspicious/atypical/suggestive, and nondiagnostic rates (%) for the head and neck FNAs were 83 versus 86, 10 versus 13, and 7 versus 1 in PGFNA group versus USGFNA group, respectively. Surgical follow‐up specimens were found in 50 PGFNAs versus 35 USGFNAs. The true‐positive, true‐negative, false‐positive, and false‐negative rates (%) were 92, 2, 2, and 4 versus 80, 17, 3, and 0 in PGFNAs versus USGFNAs, respectively. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), and accuracy were 96, 50, 98, 33, and 94% in PGFNAs versus 100, 86, 97, 100, and 97% in the USGFNA group, respectively. This study also shows increased FNAs of thyroid and salivary glands and other smaller nonpalpable lesions with ultrasound guidance. USGFNAs performed by a cytopathologist could significantly improve the specificity and NPV (P = 0.04) while preserving virtually the same excellent sensitivity and PPV as those of PGFNAs. With ultrasound guidance, a cytopathologist will be able to perform FNAs in smaller, nonpalpable lesions and target complex lesions with confidence and accuracy, thus achieving a better outcome. Diagn. Cytopathol. 2010. © 2010 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.</description><identifier>ISSN: 8755-1039</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1097-0339</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/dc.21460</identifier><identifier>PMID: 20949470</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Hoboken: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company</publisher><subject>Biopsy, Fine-Needle - methods ; Feasibility Studies ; fine-needle aspiration (FNA) ; head and neck ; Head and Neck Neoplasms - diagnosis ; Head and Neck Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging ; Head and Neck Neoplasms - pathology ; Humans ; Medical Laboratory Personnel ; Observer Variation ; palpation-guided FNAs ; Predictive Value of Tests ; Reproducibility of Results ; Sensitivity and Specificity ; Surgery, Computer-Assisted - instrumentation ; Surgery, Computer-Assisted - methods ; Ultrasonography ; ultrasound-guided FNAs</subject><ispartof>Diagnostic cytopathology, 2011-10, Vol.39 (10), p.743-751</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2010 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2010 Wiley-Liss, Inc.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3580-2b13d176bd3bc6d843d375fe4350e824723fd80ec8fc6e2789e6c814b8c6a43f3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3580-2b13d176bd3bc6d843d375fe4350e824723fd80ec8fc6e2789e6c814b8c6a43f3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Fdc.21460$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Fdc.21460$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1417,27924,27925,45574,45575</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20949470$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Wu, Maoxin</creatorcontrib><title>A comparative study of 200 head and neck FNAs performed by a cytopathologist with versus without ultrasound guidance: Evidence for improved diagnostic value with ultrasound guidance</title><title>Diagnostic cytopathology</title><addtitle>Diagn. Cytopathol</addtitle><description>Our previous study showed that the sensitivity of head and neck fine‐needle aspiration (FNA) procedures was significantly better in the cytopathologist‐performed group than in the noncytopathologist‐performed group (96 versus 67%). Recently, cytopathologists have learned to use ultrasound machines to assist them in performing FNA procedures. This study was designed to assess whether cytopathologist‐performed FNAs with ultrasound guidance can improve diagnostic value in comparison to those done without ultrasound guidance. Two hundred consecutive head and neck FNA cases performed by the same cytopathologist with and without ultrasound guidance were reviewed. Cases consisted of 100 ultrasound‐guided FNAs (USGFNAs) performed between July 2008 and March 2009 and 100 palpation‐guided FNAs (PGFNAs) performed before July 2008. These cases were correlated with follow‐up surgical diagnosis. The diagnostic, suspicious/atypical/suggestive, and nondiagnostic rates (%) for the head and neck FNAs were 83 versus 86, 10 versus 13, and 7 versus 1 in PGFNA group versus USGFNA group, respectively. Surgical follow‐up specimens were found in 50 PGFNAs versus 35 USGFNAs. The true‐positive, true‐negative, false‐positive, and false‐negative rates (%) were 92, 2, 2, and 4 versus 80, 17, 3, and 0 in PGFNAs versus USGFNAs, respectively. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), and accuracy were 96, 50, 98, 33, and 94% in PGFNAs versus 100, 86, 97, 100, and 97% in the USGFNA group, respectively. This study also shows increased FNAs of thyroid and salivary glands and other smaller nonpalpable lesions with ultrasound guidance. USGFNAs performed by a cytopathologist could significantly improve the specificity and NPV (P = 0.04) while preserving virtually the same excellent sensitivity and PPV as those of PGFNAs. With ultrasound guidance, a cytopathologist will be able to perform FNAs in smaller, nonpalpable lesions and target complex lesions with confidence and accuracy, thus achieving a better outcome. Diagn. Cytopathol. 2010. © 2010 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.</description><subject>Biopsy, Fine-Needle - methods</subject><subject>Feasibility Studies</subject><subject>fine-needle aspiration (FNA)</subject><subject>head and neck</subject><subject>Head and Neck Neoplasms - diagnosis</subject><subject>Head and Neck Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Head and Neck Neoplasms - pathology</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Medical Laboratory Personnel</subject><subject>Observer Variation</subject><subject>palpation-guided FNAs</subject><subject>Predictive Value of Tests</subject><subject>Reproducibility of Results</subject><subject>Sensitivity and Specificity</subject><subject>Surgery, Computer-Assisted - instrumentation</subject><subject>Surgery, Computer-Assisted - methods</subject><subject>Ultrasonography</subject><subject>ultrasound-guided FNAs</subject><issn>8755-1039</issn><issn>1097-0339</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2011</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kcFu1DAQhi0EoktB4gmQb3BJseMkdritlnZbVBWBQCAulmNPdk2zcWrHKXkw3g_T3fYEp_kPnz7NzI_QS0pOKCH5W6NPclpU5BFaUFLzjDBWP0YLwcsyo4TVR-hZCD8JIXVOq6foKCd1URecLNDvJdZuNyivRjsBDmM0M3YtzgnBW1AGq97gHvQ1PrtaBjyAb53fgcHNjBXW8-gGNW5d5zY2jPjWjls8gQ8x3GUXRxy70avgYvJsojWq1_AOn07WQEo42bDdDd5NyWms2vQujFbjSXUR9r5_CJ6jJ63qArw4zGP09ez0y-o8u_y4vlgtLzPNSkGyvKHMUF41hjW6MqJghvGyhYKVBERe8Jy1RhDQotUV5FzUUGlBi0boShWsZcfo9d6bFryJEEa5s0FD16keXAxS1KTiNKc8kW_2pPYuBA-tHLzdKT9LSuTfjqTR8q6jhL46SGOTPvkA3peSgGwP3NoO5v-K5PvVvfDApwrg1wOv_LWseDpYfrtayw_fP_9Yi-KT5OwPOp6s1g</recordid><startdate>201110</startdate><enddate>201110</enddate><creator>Wu, Maoxin</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201110</creationdate><title>A comparative study of 200 head and neck FNAs performed by a cytopathologist with versus without ultrasound guidance: Evidence for improved diagnostic value with ultrasound guidance</title><author>Wu, Maoxin</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3580-2b13d176bd3bc6d843d375fe4350e824723fd80ec8fc6e2789e6c814b8c6a43f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2011</creationdate><topic>Biopsy, Fine-Needle - methods</topic><topic>Feasibility Studies</topic><topic>fine-needle aspiration (FNA)</topic><topic>head and neck</topic><topic>Head and Neck Neoplasms - diagnosis</topic><topic>Head and Neck Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Head and Neck Neoplasms - pathology</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Medical Laboratory Personnel</topic><topic>Observer Variation</topic><topic>palpation-guided FNAs</topic><topic>Predictive Value of Tests</topic><topic>Reproducibility of Results</topic><topic>Sensitivity and Specificity</topic><topic>Surgery, Computer-Assisted - instrumentation</topic><topic>Surgery, Computer-Assisted - methods</topic><topic>Ultrasonography</topic><topic>ultrasound-guided FNAs</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Wu, Maoxin</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Diagnostic cytopathology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Wu, Maoxin</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A comparative study of 200 head and neck FNAs performed by a cytopathologist with versus without ultrasound guidance: Evidence for improved diagnostic value with ultrasound guidance</atitle><jtitle>Diagnostic cytopathology</jtitle><addtitle>Diagn. Cytopathol</addtitle><date>2011-10</date><risdate>2011</risdate><volume>39</volume><issue>10</issue><spage>743</spage><epage>751</epage><pages>743-751</pages><issn>8755-1039</issn><eissn>1097-0339</eissn><abstract>Our previous study showed that the sensitivity of head and neck fine‐needle aspiration (FNA) procedures was significantly better in the cytopathologist‐performed group than in the noncytopathologist‐performed group (96 versus 67%). Recently, cytopathologists have learned to use ultrasound machines to assist them in performing FNA procedures. This study was designed to assess whether cytopathologist‐performed FNAs with ultrasound guidance can improve diagnostic value in comparison to those done without ultrasound guidance. Two hundred consecutive head and neck FNA cases performed by the same cytopathologist with and without ultrasound guidance were reviewed. Cases consisted of 100 ultrasound‐guided FNAs (USGFNAs) performed between July 2008 and March 2009 and 100 palpation‐guided FNAs (PGFNAs) performed before July 2008. These cases were correlated with follow‐up surgical diagnosis. The diagnostic, suspicious/atypical/suggestive, and nondiagnostic rates (%) for the head and neck FNAs were 83 versus 86, 10 versus 13, and 7 versus 1 in PGFNA group versus USGFNA group, respectively. Surgical follow‐up specimens were found in 50 PGFNAs versus 35 USGFNAs. The true‐positive, true‐negative, false‐positive, and false‐negative rates (%) were 92, 2, 2, and 4 versus 80, 17, 3, and 0 in PGFNAs versus USGFNAs, respectively. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), and accuracy were 96, 50, 98, 33, and 94% in PGFNAs versus 100, 86, 97, 100, and 97% in the USGFNA group, respectively. This study also shows increased FNAs of thyroid and salivary glands and other smaller nonpalpable lesions with ultrasound guidance. USGFNAs performed by a cytopathologist could significantly improve the specificity and NPV (P = 0.04) while preserving virtually the same excellent sensitivity and PPV as those of PGFNAs. With ultrasound guidance, a cytopathologist will be able to perform FNAs in smaller, nonpalpable lesions and target complex lesions with confidence and accuracy, thus achieving a better outcome. Diagn. Cytopathol. 2010. © 2010 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.</abstract><cop>Hoboken</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company</pub><pmid>20949470</pmid><doi>10.1002/dc.21460</doi><tpages>9</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 8755-1039
ispartof Diagnostic cytopathology, 2011-10, Vol.39 (10), p.743-751
issn 8755-1039
1097-0339
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_890671217
source MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library All Journals
subjects Biopsy, Fine-Needle - methods
Feasibility Studies
fine-needle aspiration (FNA)
head and neck
Head and Neck Neoplasms - diagnosis
Head and Neck Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging
Head and Neck Neoplasms - pathology
Humans
Medical Laboratory Personnel
Observer Variation
palpation-guided FNAs
Predictive Value of Tests
Reproducibility of Results
Sensitivity and Specificity
Surgery, Computer-Assisted - instrumentation
Surgery, Computer-Assisted - methods
Ultrasonography
ultrasound-guided FNAs
title A comparative study of 200 head and neck FNAs performed by a cytopathologist with versus without ultrasound guidance: Evidence for improved diagnostic value with ultrasound guidance
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-06T11%3A13%3A48IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20comparative%20study%20of%20200%20head%20and%20neck%20FNAs%20performed%20by%20a%20cytopathologist%20with%20versus%20without%20ultrasound%20guidance:%20Evidence%20for%20improved%20diagnostic%20value%20with%20ultrasound%20guidance&rft.jtitle=Diagnostic%20cytopathology&rft.au=Wu,%20Maoxin&rft.date=2011-10&rft.volume=39&rft.issue=10&rft.spage=743&rft.epage=751&rft.pages=743-751&rft.issn=8755-1039&rft.eissn=1097-0339&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/dc.21460&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E890671217%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=890671217&rft_id=info:pmid/20949470&rfr_iscdi=true