Plant-frugivore interactions in an intact tropical forest in north-east Thailand

Fleshy‐fruited plants in tropical forests largely rely on vertebrate frugivores to disperse their seeds. Although this plant–animal interaction is typically considered a diffuse mutualism, it is fundamental as it provides the template on which tropical forest communities are structured. We applied a...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Integrative zoology 2011-09, Vol.6 (3), p.195-212
Hauptverfasser: SANKAMETHAWEE, Wangworn, PIERCE, Andrew J., GALE, George A., HARDESTY, Britta Denise
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 212
container_issue 3
container_start_page 195
container_title Integrative zoology
container_volume 6
creator SANKAMETHAWEE, Wangworn
PIERCE, Andrew J.
GALE, George A.
HARDESTY, Britta Denise
description Fleshy‐fruited plants in tropical forests largely rely on vertebrate frugivores to disperse their seeds. Although this plant–animal interaction is typically considered a diffuse mutualism, it is fundamental as it provides the template on which tropical forest communities are structured. We applied a mutualistic network approach to investigate the relationship between small‐fruited fleshy plant species and the fruit‐eating bird community in an intact evergreen forest in northeast Thailand. A minimum of 53 bird species consumed fruits of 136 plant species. Plant‐avian frugivore networks were highly asymmetrical, with observed networks filling 30% of all potential links. Whereas some of the missing links in the present study might be due to undersampling, forbidden links can be attributed to size constraints, accessibility and phenological uncoupling, and although the majority of missing links were unknown (58.2%), many were probably due to a given bird species being either rare or only a very occasional fruit eater. The most common frugivores were bulbuls, barbets and fairy‐bluebirds, which were responsible for the majority of fruit removal from small fleshy fruited species in our system. Migratory birds seemed to be a minor component of the plant‐frugivore networks, accounting for only 3% of feeding visits to fruiting trees; they filled 2% of the overall potential networks. The majority of interactions were generalized unspecific; however, Saurauia roxburghii Wall. appeared to be dependent on flowerpeckers for dispersal, while Thick‐billed Pigeons were only seen to eat figs.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/j.1749-4877.2011.00244.x
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_889453959</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>889453959</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4724-e3bea59336ad808dd18d233ae7cdfafcdaf683d73b9c4398cf90b74f3bf331cf3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkMtOwzAQRS0E4lH4BZQdqwQ7dmJ7wQIhKJUKFKkIxMZy_ACXNCl2CuXvcSh0jTeex70zowNAgmCG4judZYgSnhJGaZZDhDIIc0Ky1RbY3zS2N3HJ98BBCDMIS1iUxS7YyxFHkGG-DyaTWjZdav3yxX203iSu6YyXqnNtE2KSyKYvxULS-XbhlKwTG3Wh65tN67vX1MiYTV-li6P0Idixsg7m6PcfgIery-nFdTq-G44uzsepIjQnqcGVkQXHuJSaQaY1YjrHWBqqtJVWaWlLhjXFFVcEc6YshxUlFlcWY6QsHoCT9dyFb9-X8R4xd0GZOt5g2mUQjHFSYB5XDABbK5VvQ_DGioV3c-m_BIKixylmoiclemqixyl-cIpVtB7_LllWc6M3xj9-UXC2Fny62nz9e7AY3T7nMYr-dO13oTOrjV_6N1FSTAvxeDsUk3t284yehqLE32c6lJs</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>889453959</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Plant-frugivore interactions in an intact tropical forest in north-east Thailand</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>SANKAMETHAWEE, Wangworn ; PIERCE, Andrew J. ; GALE, George A. ; HARDESTY, Britta Denise</creator><creatorcontrib>SANKAMETHAWEE, Wangworn ; PIERCE, Andrew J. ; GALE, George A. ; HARDESTY, Britta Denise</creatorcontrib><description>Fleshy‐fruited plants in tropical forests largely rely on vertebrate frugivores to disperse their seeds. Although this plant–animal interaction is typically considered a diffuse mutualism, it is fundamental as it provides the template on which tropical forest communities are structured. We applied a mutualistic network approach to investigate the relationship between small‐fruited fleshy plant species and the fruit‐eating bird community in an intact evergreen forest in northeast Thailand. A minimum of 53 bird species consumed fruits of 136 plant species. Plant‐avian frugivore networks were highly asymmetrical, with observed networks filling 30% of all potential links. Whereas some of the missing links in the present study might be due to undersampling, forbidden links can be attributed to size constraints, accessibility and phenological uncoupling, and although the majority of missing links were unknown (58.2%), many were probably due to a given bird species being either rare or only a very occasional fruit eater. The most common frugivores were bulbuls, barbets and fairy‐bluebirds, which were responsible for the majority of fruit removal from small fleshy fruited species in our system. Migratory birds seemed to be a minor component of the plant‐frugivore networks, accounting for only 3% of feeding visits to fruiting trees; they filled 2% of the overall potential networks. The majority of interactions were generalized unspecific; however, Saurauia roxburghii Wall. appeared to be dependent on flowerpeckers for dispersal, while Thick‐billed Pigeons were only seen to eat figs.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1749-4869</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1749-4877</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1749-4877</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/j.1749-4877.2011.00244.x</identifier><identifier>PMID: 21910839</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Animals ; avian frugivore ; Birds - physiology ; Feeding Behavior ; Food Chain ; Fruit - physiology ; nestedness ; plant-frugivore networks ; Population Dynamics ; Rainforest ; Seed Dispersal ; Symbiosis ; Thailand ; Trees - physiology ; tropical forest</subject><ispartof>Integrative zoology, 2011-09, Vol.6 (3), p.195-212</ispartof><rights>2011 ISZS, Blackwell Publishing and IOZ/CAS</rights><rights>2011 ISZS, Blackwell Publishing and IOZ/CAS.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4724-e3bea59336ad808dd18d233ae7cdfafcdaf683d73b9c4398cf90b74f3bf331cf3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4724-e3bea59336ad808dd18d233ae7cdfafcdaf683d73b9c4398cf90b74f3bf331cf3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fj.1749-4877.2011.00244.x$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fj.1749-4877.2011.00244.x$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27903,27904,45553,45554</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21910839$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>SANKAMETHAWEE, Wangworn</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>PIERCE, Andrew J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>GALE, George A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>HARDESTY, Britta Denise</creatorcontrib><title>Plant-frugivore interactions in an intact tropical forest in north-east Thailand</title><title>Integrative zoology</title><addtitle>Integr Zool</addtitle><description>Fleshy‐fruited plants in tropical forests largely rely on vertebrate frugivores to disperse their seeds. Although this plant–animal interaction is typically considered a diffuse mutualism, it is fundamental as it provides the template on which tropical forest communities are structured. We applied a mutualistic network approach to investigate the relationship between small‐fruited fleshy plant species and the fruit‐eating bird community in an intact evergreen forest in northeast Thailand. A minimum of 53 bird species consumed fruits of 136 plant species. Plant‐avian frugivore networks were highly asymmetrical, with observed networks filling 30% of all potential links. Whereas some of the missing links in the present study might be due to undersampling, forbidden links can be attributed to size constraints, accessibility and phenological uncoupling, and although the majority of missing links were unknown (58.2%), many were probably due to a given bird species being either rare or only a very occasional fruit eater. The most common frugivores were bulbuls, barbets and fairy‐bluebirds, which were responsible for the majority of fruit removal from small fleshy fruited species in our system. Migratory birds seemed to be a minor component of the plant‐frugivore networks, accounting for only 3% of feeding visits to fruiting trees; they filled 2% of the overall potential networks. The majority of interactions were generalized unspecific; however, Saurauia roxburghii Wall. appeared to be dependent on flowerpeckers for dispersal, while Thick‐billed Pigeons were only seen to eat figs.</description><subject>Animals</subject><subject>avian frugivore</subject><subject>Birds - physiology</subject><subject>Feeding Behavior</subject><subject>Food Chain</subject><subject>Fruit - physiology</subject><subject>nestedness</subject><subject>plant-frugivore networks</subject><subject>Population Dynamics</subject><subject>Rainforest</subject><subject>Seed Dispersal</subject><subject>Symbiosis</subject><subject>Thailand</subject><subject>Trees - physiology</subject><subject>tropical forest</subject><issn>1749-4869</issn><issn>1749-4877</issn><issn>1749-4877</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2011</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkMtOwzAQRS0E4lH4BZQdqwQ7dmJ7wQIhKJUKFKkIxMZy_ACXNCl2CuXvcSh0jTeex70zowNAgmCG4judZYgSnhJGaZZDhDIIc0Ky1RbY3zS2N3HJ98BBCDMIS1iUxS7YyxFHkGG-DyaTWjZdav3yxX203iSu6YyXqnNtE2KSyKYvxULS-XbhlKwTG3Wh65tN67vX1MiYTV-li6P0Idixsg7m6PcfgIery-nFdTq-G44uzsepIjQnqcGVkQXHuJSaQaY1YjrHWBqqtJVWaWlLhjXFFVcEc6YshxUlFlcWY6QsHoCT9dyFb9-X8R4xd0GZOt5g2mUQjHFSYB5XDABbK5VvQ_DGioV3c-m_BIKixylmoiclemqixyl-cIpVtB7_LllWc6M3xj9-UXC2Fny62nz9e7AY3T7nMYr-dO13oTOrjV_6N1FSTAvxeDsUk3t284yehqLE32c6lJs</recordid><startdate>201109</startdate><enddate>201109</enddate><creator>SANKAMETHAWEE, Wangworn</creator><creator>PIERCE, Andrew J.</creator><creator>GALE, George A.</creator><creator>HARDESTY, Britta Denise</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201109</creationdate><title>Plant-frugivore interactions in an intact tropical forest in north-east Thailand</title><author>SANKAMETHAWEE, Wangworn ; PIERCE, Andrew J. ; GALE, George A. ; HARDESTY, Britta Denise</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4724-e3bea59336ad808dd18d233ae7cdfafcdaf683d73b9c4398cf90b74f3bf331cf3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2011</creationdate><topic>Animals</topic><topic>avian frugivore</topic><topic>Birds - physiology</topic><topic>Feeding Behavior</topic><topic>Food Chain</topic><topic>Fruit - physiology</topic><topic>nestedness</topic><topic>plant-frugivore networks</topic><topic>Population Dynamics</topic><topic>Rainforest</topic><topic>Seed Dispersal</topic><topic>Symbiosis</topic><topic>Thailand</topic><topic>Trees - physiology</topic><topic>tropical forest</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>SANKAMETHAWEE, Wangworn</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>PIERCE, Andrew J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>GALE, George A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>HARDESTY, Britta Denise</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Integrative zoology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>SANKAMETHAWEE, Wangworn</au><au>PIERCE, Andrew J.</au><au>GALE, George A.</au><au>HARDESTY, Britta Denise</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Plant-frugivore interactions in an intact tropical forest in north-east Thailand</atitle><jtitle>Integrative zoology</jtitle><addtitle>Integr Zool</addtitle><date>2011-09</date><risdate>2011</risdate><volume>6</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>195</spage><epage>212</epage><pages>195-212</pages><issn>1749-4869</issn><issn>1749-4877</issn><eissn>1749-4877</eissn><abstract>Fleshy‐fruited plants in tropical forests largely rely on vertebrate frugivores to disperse their seeds. Although this plant–animal interaction is typically considered a diffuse mutualism, it is fundamental as it provides the template on which tropical forest communities are structured. We applied a mutualistic network approach to investigate the relationship between small‐fruited fleshy plant species and the fruit‐eating bird community in an intact evergreen forest in northeast Thailand. A minimum of 53 bird species consumed fruits of 136 plant species. Plant‐avian frugivore networks were highly asymmetrical, with observed networks filling 30% of all potential links. Whereas some of the missing links in the present study might be due to undersampling, forbidden links can be attributed to size constraints, accessibility and phenological uncoupling, and although the majority of missing links were unknown (58.2%), many were probably due to a given bird species being either rare or only a very occasional fruit eater. The most common frugivores were bulbuls, barbets and fairy‐bluebirds, which were responsible for the majority of fruit removal from small fleshy fruited species in our system. Migratory birds seemed to be a minor component of the plant‐frugivore networks, accounting for only 3% of feeding visits to fruiting trees; they filled 2% of the overall potential networks. The majority of interactions were generalized unspecific; however, Saurauia roxburghii Wall. appeared to be dependent on flowerpeckers for dispersal, while Thick‐billed Pigeons were only seen to eat figs.</abstract><cop>Oxford, UK</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><pmid>21910839</pmid><doi>10.1111/j.1749-4877.2011.00244.x</doi><tpages>18</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1749-4869
ispartof Integrative zoology, 2011-09, Vol.6 (3), p.195-212
issn 1749-4869
1749-4877
1749-4877
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_889453959
source MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete
subjects Animals
avian frugivore
Birds - physiology
Feeding Behavior
Food Chain
Fruit - physiology
nestedness
plant-frugivore networks
Population Dynamics
Rainforest
Seed Dispersal
Symbiosis
Thailand
Trees - physiology
tropical forest
title Plant-frugivore interactions in an intact tropical forest in north-east Thailand
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-24T14%3A13%3A39IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Plant-frugivore%20interactions%20in%20an%20intact%20tropical%20forest%20in%20north-east%20Thailand&rft.jtitle=Integrative%20zoology&rft.au=SANKAMETHAWEE,%20Wangworn&rft.date=2011-09&rft.volume=6&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=195&rft.epage=212&rft.pages=195-212&rft.issn=1749-4869&rft.eissn=1749-4877&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/j.1749-4877.2011.00244.x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E889453959%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=889453959&rft_id=info:pmid/21910839&rfr_iscdi=true