Neurocognitive predictors of functional outcome two to 13 years after identification as ultra-high risk for psychosis
Abstract Background and aim Little is known about the relationship between neurocognitive performance and functional outcome before the onset of frank psychosis. This longitudinal study aimed to investigate neurocognitive predictors of poor functional outcome in a group identified as ultra-high risk...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Schizophrenia research 2011-10, Vol.132 (1), p.1-7 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 7 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 1 |
container_title | Schizophrenia research |
container_volume | 132 |
creator | Lin, A Wood, S.J Nelson, B Brewer, W.J Spiliotacopoulos, D Bruxner, A Broussard, C Pantelis, C Yung, A.R |
description | Abstract Background and aim Little is known about the relationship between neurocognitive performance and functional outcome before the onset of frank psychosis. This longitudinal study aimed to investigate neurocognitive predictors of poor functional outcome in a group identified as ultra-high risk (UHR) for psychosis between two and 13 years prior. Method Individuals ( N = 230) identified as UHR for psychosis at the PACE Clinic in Melbourne completed assessment of psychopathology, functioning and neurocognition at baseline and follow-up. The mean length of follow-up was 7.26 years ( SD 3.05). Results Forty-one individuals with the poorest functional outcome were identified. Only 48.8% of this group had transitioned to psychosis. Poor functional outcome was associated with reduced performance at baseline in the specific neurocognitive domains of verbal learning and memory, processing speed and attention, and verbal fluency, but not global cognitive impairment. Reduced performance on a verbal story recall task, in combination with higher negative symptoms at baseline, was the best predictor of later poor outcome. Baseline positive psychotic symptoms and GAF scores were not associated with later poor outcome. Discussion To date, this is the longest follow-up study of an UHR sample. Poor functional outcome was associated with specific neurocognitive decrements, regardless of transition to psychosis. The detection of individuals with poor functioning at follow-up, against a background of previously identified risk factors for psychotic disorder, may yield a valid group in which to study biomarkers and treatment of schizophrenia. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.schres.2011.06.014 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_889452563</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>1_s2_0_S0920996411003197</els_id><sourcerecordid>889452563</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-e225t-425f9c4198903fe587cc378480bfcfbf58f896c886909535757f23b80b37840a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpF0cFuEzEQBmALgWgovAFCviBOu4zt9a59QUJVoUgVHIDzynHGjdPNOnjsorw9GzWopznMp5Hm_xl7K6AVIPqPu5b8NiO1EoRooW9BdM_YSuhBNVKDfc5WYCU01vbdBXtFtAMAoWF4yS6kGHolwK5Y_Y41J5_u5ljiA_JDxk30JWXiKfBQZ19imt3EUy0-7ZGXv4mXxIXiR3SLcqFg5nGDc4khenfi3BGvU8mu2ca7Lc-R7nlImR_o6LeJIr1mL4KbCN-c5yX7_eX619VNc_vj67erz7cNSqlL00kdrO-ENRZUQG0G79VgOgPr4MM6aBOM7b0xvQWrlR70EKRaL-uTAqcu2YfHu4ec_lSkMu4jeZwmN2OqNBpjOy11rxb57izreo-b8ZDj3uXj-D-pBbw_A0feTSG72Ud6cp0eZK-6xX16dLj89RAxj36K8xLMdI9HpF2qeYmTRjGSHGH8eeroVJEQAErYQf0DHASPgw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>889452563</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Neurocognitive predictors of functional outcome two to 13 years after identification as ultra-high risk for psychosis</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Lin, A ; Wood, S.J ; Nelson, B ; Brewer, W.J ; Spiliotacopoulos, D ; Bruxner, A ; Broussard, C ; Pantelis, C ; Yung, A.R</creator><creatorcontrib>Lin, A ; Wood, S.J ; Nelson, B ; Brewer, W.J ; Spiliotacopoulos, D ; Bruxner, A ; Broussard, C ; Pantelis, C ; Yung, A.R</creatorcontrib><description>Abstract Background and aim Little is known about the relationship between neurocognitive performance and functional outcome before the onset of frank psychosis. This longitudinal study aimed to investigate neurocognitive predictors of poor functional outcome in a group identified as ultra-high risk (UHR) for psychosis between two and 13 years prior. Method Individuals ( N = 230) identified as UHR for psychosis at the PACE Clinic in Melbourne completed assessment of psychopathology, functioning and neurocognition at baseline and follow-up. The mean length of follow-up was 7.26 years ( SD 3.05). Results Forty-one individuals with the poorest functional outcome were identified. Only 48.8% of this group had transitioned to psychosis. Poor functional outcome was associated with reduced performance at baseline in the specific neurocognitive domains of verbal learning and memory, processing speed and attention, and verbal fluency, but not global cognitive impairment. Reduced performance on a verbal story recall task, in combination with higher negative symptoms at baseline, was the best predictor of later poor outcome. Baseline positive psychotic symptoms and GAF scores were not associated with later poor outcome. Discussion To date, this is the longest follow-up study of an UHR sample. Poor functional outcome was associated with specific neurocognitive decrements, regardless of transition to psychosis. The detection of individuals with poor functioning at follow-up, against a background of previously identified risk factors for psychotic disorder, may yield a valid group in which to study biomarkers and treatment of schizophrenia.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0920-9964</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-2509</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.schres.2011.06.014</identifier><identifier>PMID: 21763109</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Amsterdam: Elsevier</publisher><subject>Adolescent ; Adult ; Adult and adolescent clinical studies ; Analysis of Variance ; Biological and medical sciences ; Cognition Disorders - diagnosis ; Cognition Disorders - etiology ; Cognition Disorders - psychology ; Disease Progression ; Female ; Humans ; Logistic Models ; Longitudinal Studies ; Male ; Medical sciences ; Neuropsychological Tests ; Other psychotic disorders ; Predictive Value of Tests ; Psychiatric Status Rating Scales ; Psychiatry ; Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry ; Psychopathology. Psychiatry ; Psychoses ; Psychotic Disorders - complications ; Psychotic Disorders - diagnosis ; Psychotic Disorders - psychology ; Quality of Life ; Retrospective Studies ; Risk Factors ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>Schizophrenia research, 2011-10, Vol.132 (1), p.1-7</ispartof><rights>Elsevier B.V.</rights><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright © 2011 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=24572634$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21763109$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Lin, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wood, S.J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nelson, B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brewer, W.J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Spiliotacopoulos, D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bruxner, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Broussard, C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pantelis, C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yung, A.R</creatorcontrib><title>Neurocognitive predictors of functional outcome two to 13 years after identification as ultra-high risk for psychosis</title><title>Schizophrenia research</title><addtitle>Schizophr Res</addtitle><description>Abstract Background and aim Little is known about the relationship between neurocognitive performance and functional outcome before the onset of frank psychosis. This longitudinal study aimed to investigate neurocognitive predictors of poor functional outcome in a group identified as ultra-high risk (UHR) for psychosis between two and 13 years prior. Method Individuals ( N = 230) identified as UHR for psychosis at the PACE Clinic in Melbourne completed assessment of psychopathology, functioning and neurocognition at baseline and follow-up. The mean length of follow-up was 7.26 years ( SD 3.05). Results Forty-one individuals with the poorest functional outcome were identified. Only 48.8% of this group had transitioned to psychosis. Poor functional outcome was associated with reduced performance at baseline in the specific neurocognitive domains of verbal learning and memory, processing speed and attention, and verbal fluency, but not global cognitive impairment. Reduced performance on a verbal story recall task, in combination with higher negative symptoms at baseline, was the best predictor of later poor outcome. Baseline positive psychotic symptoms and GAF scores were not associated with later poor outcome. Discussion To date, this is the longest follow-up study of an UHR sample. Poor functional outcome was associated with specific neurocognitive decrements, regardless of transition to psychosis. The detection of individuals with poor functioning at follow-up, against a background of previously identified risk factors for psychotic disorder, may yield a valid group in which to study biomarkers and treatment of schizophrenia.</description><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Adult and adolescent clinical studies</subject><subject>Analysis of Variance</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Cognition Disorders - diagnosis</subject><subject>Cognition Disorders - etiology</subject><subject>Cognition Disorders - psychology</subject><subject>Disease Progression</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Logistic Models</subject><subject>Longitudinal Studies</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Neuropsychological Tests</subject><subject>Other psychotic disorders</subject><subject>Predictive Value of Tests</subject><subject>Psychiatric Status Rating Scales</subject><subject>Psychiatry</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</subject><subject>Psychopathology. Psychiatry</subject><subject>Psychoses</subject><subject>Psychotic Disorders - complications</subject><subject>Psychotic Disorders - diagnosis</subject><subject>Psychotic Disorders - psychology</subject><subject>Quality of Life</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Risk Factors</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>0920-9964</issn><issn>1573-2509</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2011</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpF0cFuEzEQBmALgWgovAFCviBOu4zt9a59QUJVoUgVHIDzynHGjdPNOnjsorw9GzWopznMp5Hm_xl7K6AVIPqPu5b8NiO1EoRooW9BdM_YSuhBNVKDfc5WYCU01vbdBXtFtAMAoWF4yS6kGHolwK5Y_Y41J5_u5ljiA_JDxk30JWXiKfBQZ19imt3EUy0-7ZGXv4mXxIXiR3SLcqFg5nGDc4khenfi3BGvU8mu2ca7Lc-R7nlImR_o6LeJIr1mL4KbCN-c5yX7_eX619VNc_vj67erz7cNSqlL00kdrO-ENRZUQG0G79VgOgPr4MM6aBOM7b0xvQWrlR70EKRaL-uTAqcu2YfHu4ec_lSkMu4jeZwmN2OqNBpjOy11rxb57izreo-b8ZDj3uXj-D-pBbw_A0feTSG72Ud6cp0eZK-6xX16dLj89RAxj36K8xLMdI9HpF2qeYmTRjGSHGH8eeroVJEQAErYQf0DHASPgw</recordid><startdate>20111001</startdate><enddate>20111001</enddate><creator>Lin, A</creator><creator>Wood, S.J</creator><creator>Nelson, B</creator><creator>Brewer, W.J</creator><creator>Spiliotacopoulos, D</creator><creator>Bruxner, A</creator><creator>Broussard, C</creator><creator>Pantelis, C</creator><creator>Yung, A.R</creator><general>Elsevier</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20111001</creationdate><title>Neurocognitive predictors of functional outcome two to 13 years after identification as ultra-high risk for psychosis</title><author>Lin, A ; Wood, S.J ; Nelson, B ; Brewer, W.J ; Spiliotacopoulos, D ; Bruxner, A ; Broussard, C ; Pantelis, C ; Yung, A.R</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-e225t-425f9c4198903fe587cc378480bfcfbf58f896c886909535757f23b80b37840a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2011</creationdate><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Adult and adolescent clinical studies</topic><topic>Analysis of Variance</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Cognition Disorders - diagnosis</topic><topic>Cognition Disorders - etiology</topic><topic>Cognition Disorders - psychology</topic><topic>Disease Progression</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Logistic Models</topic><topic>Longitudinal Studies</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Neuropsychological Tests</topic><topic>Other psychotic disorders</topic><topic>Predictive Value of Tests</topic><topic>Psychiatric Status Rating Scales</topic><topic>Psychiatry</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</topic><topic>Psychopathology. Psychiatry</topic><topic>Psychoses</topic><topic>Psychotic Disorders - complications</topic><topic>Psychotic Disorders - diagnosis</topic><topic>Psychotic Disorders - psychology</topic><topic>Quality of Life</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Risk Factors</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Lin, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wood, S.J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nelson, B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brewer, W.J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Spiliotacopoulos, D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bruxner, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Broussard, C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pantelis, C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yung, A.R</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Schizophrenia research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Lin, A</au><au>Wood, S.J</au><au>Nelson, B</au><au>Brewer, W.J</au><au>Spiliotacopoulos, D</au><au>Bruxner, A</au><au>Broussard, C</au><au>Pantelis, C</au><au>Yung, A.R</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Neurocognitive predictors of functional outcome two to 13 years after identification as ultra-high risk for psychosis</atitle><jtitle>Schizophrenia research</jtitle><addtitle>Schizophr Res</addtitle><date>2011-10-01</date><risdate>2011</risdate><volume>132</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>1</spage><epage>7</epage><pages>1-7</pages><issn>0920-9964</issn><eissn>1573-2509</eissn><abstract>Abstract Background and aim Little is known about the relationship between neurocognitive performance and functional outcome before the onset of frank psychosis. This longitudinal study aimed to investigate neurocognitive predictors of poor functional outcome in a group identified as ultra-high risk (UHR) for psychosis between two and 13 years prior. Method Individuals ( N = 230) identified as UHR for psychosis at the PACE Clinic in Melbourne completed assessment of psychopathology, functioning and neurocognition at baseline and follow-up. The mean length of follow-up was 7.26 years ( SD 3.05). Results Forty-one individuals with the poorest functional outcome were identified. Only 48.8% of this group had transitioned to psychosis. Poor functional outcome was associated with reduced performance at baseline in the specific neurocognitive domains of verbal learning and memory, processing speed and attention, and verbal fluency, but not global cognitive impairment. Reduced performance on a verbal story recall task, in combination with higher negative symptoms at baseline, was the best predictor of later poor outcome. Baseline positive psychotic symptoms and GAF scores were not associated with later poor outcome. Discussion To date, this is the longest follow-up study of an UHR sample. Poor functional outcome was associated with specific neurocognitive decrements, regardless of transition to psychosis. The detection of individuals with poor functioning at follow-up, against a background of previously identified risk factors for psychotic disorder, may yield a valid group in which to study biomarkers and treatment of schizophrenia.</abstract><cop>Amsterdam</cop><pub>Elsevier</pub><pmid>21763109</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.schres.2011.06.014</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0920-9964 |
ispartof | Schizophrenia research, 2011-10, Vol.132 (1), p.1-7 |
issn | 0920-9964 1573-2509 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_889452563 |
source | MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals |
subjects | Adolescent Adult Adult and adolescent clinical studies Analysis of Variance Biological and medical sciences Cognition Disorders - diagnosis Cognition Disorders - etiology Cognition Disorders - psychology Disease Progression Female Humans Logistic Models Longitudinal Studies Male Medical sciences Neuropsychological Tests Other psychotic disorders Predictive Value of Tests Psychiatric Status Rating Scales Psychiatry Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry Psychopathology. Psychiatry Psychoses Psychotic Disorders - complications Psychotic Disorders - diagnosis Psychotic Disorders - psychology Quality of Life Retrospective Studies Risk Factors Young Adult |
title | Neurocognitive predictors of functional outcome two to 13 years after identification as ultra-high risk for psychosis |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-18T11%3A24%3A09IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Neurocognitive%20predictors%20of%20functional%20outcome%20two%20to%2013%20years%20after%20identification%20as%20ultra-high%20risk%20for%20psychosis&rft.jtitle=Schizophrenia%20research&rft.au=Lin,%20A&rft.date=2011-10-01&rft.volume=132&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=1&rft.epage=7&rft.pages=1-7&rft.issn=0920-9964&rft.eissn=1573-2509&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.schres.2011.06.014&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E889452563%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=889452563&rft_id=info:pmid/21763109&rft_els_id=1_s2_0_S0920996411003197&rfr_iscdi=true |