Neurocognitive predictors of functional outcome two to 13 years after identification as ultra-high risk for psychosis

Abstract Background and aim Little is known about the relationship between neurocognitive performance and functional outcome before the onset of frank psychosis. This longitudinal study aimed to investigate neurocognitive predictors of poor functional outcome in a group identified as ultra-high risk...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Schizophrenia research 2011-10, Vol.132 (1), p.1-7
Hauptverfasser: Lin, A, Wood, S.J, Nelson, B, Brewer, W.J, Spiliotacopoulos, D, Bruxner, A, Broussard, C, Pantelis, C, Yung, A.R
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 7
container_issue 1
container_start_page 1
container_title Schizophrenia research
container_volume 132
creator Lin, A
Wood, S.J
Nelson, B
Brewer, W.J
Spiliotacopoulos, D
Bruxner, A
Broussard, C
Pantelis, C
Yung, A.R
description Abstract Background and aim Little is known about the relationship between neurocognitive performance and functional outcome before the onset of frank psychosis. This longitudinal study aimed to investigate neurocognitive predictors of poor functional outcome in a group identified as ultra-high risk (UHR) for psychosis between two and 13 years prior. Method Individuals ( N = 230) identified as UHR for psychosis at the PACE Clinic in Melbourne completed assessment of psychopathology, functioning and neurocognition at baseline and follow-up. The mean length of follow-up was 7.26 years ( SD 3.05). Results Forty-one individuals with the poorest functional outcome were identified. Only 48.8% of this group had transitioned to psychosis. Poor functional outcome was associated with reduced performance at baseline in the specific neurocognitive domains of verbal learning and memory, processing speed and attention, and verbal fluency, but not global cognitive impairment. Reduced performance on a verbal story recall task, in combination with higher negative symptoms at baseline, was the best predictor of later poor outcome. Baseline positive psychotic symptoms and GAF scores were not associated with later poor outcome. Discussion To date, this is the longest follow-up study of an UHR sample. Poor functional outcome was associated with specific neurocognitive decrements, regardless of transition to psychosis. The detection of individuals with poor functioning at follow-up, against a background of previously identified risk factors for psychotic disorder, may yield a valid group in which to study biomarkers and treatment of schizophrenia.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.schres.2011.06.014
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_889452563</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>1_s2_0_S0920996411003197</els_id><sourcerecordid>889452563</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-e225t-425f9c4198903fe587cc378480bfcfbf58f896c886909535757f23b80b37840a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpF0cFuEzEQBmALgWgovAFCviBOu4zt9a59QUJVoUgVHIDzynHGjdPNOnjsorw9GzWopznMp5Hm_xl7K6AVIPqPu5b8NiO1EoRooW9BdM_YSuhBNVKDfc5WYCU01vbdBXtFtAMAoWF4yS6kGHolwK5Y_Y41J5_u5ljiA_JDxk30JWXiKfBQZ19imt3EUy0-7ZGXv4mXxIXiR3SLcqFg5nGDc4khenfi3BGvU8mu2ca7Lc-R7nlImR_o6LeJIr1mL4KbCN-c5yX7_eX619VNc_vj67erz7cNSqlL00kdrO-ENRZUQG0G79VgOgPr4MM6aBOM7b0xvQWrlR70EKRaL-uTAqcu2YfHu4ec_lSkMu4jeZwmN2OqNBpjOy11rxb57izreo-b8ZDj3uXj-D-pBbw_A0feTSG72Ud6cp0eZK-6xX16dLj89RAxj36K8xLMdI9HpF2qeYmTRjGSHGH8eeroVJEQAErYQf0DHASPgw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>889452563</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Neurocognitive predictors of functional outcome two to 13 years after identification as ultra-high risk for psychosis</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Lin, A ; Wood, S.J ; Nelson, B ; Brewer, W.J ; Spiliotacopoulos, D ; Bruxner, A ; Broussard, C ; Pantelis, C ; Yung, A.R</creator><creatorcontrib>Lin, A ; Wood, S.J ; Nelson, B ; Brewer, W.J ; Spiliotacopoulos, D ; Bruxner, A ; Broussard, C ; Pantelis, C ; Yung, A.R</creatorcontrib><description>Abstract Background and aim Little is known about the relationship between neurocognitive performance and functional outcome before the onset of frank psychosis. This longitudinal study aimed to investigate neurocognitive predictors of poor functional outcome in a group identified as ultra-high risk (UHR) for psychosis between two and 13 years prior. Method Individuals ( N = 230) identified as UHR for psychosis at the PACE Clinic in Melbourne completed assessment of psychopathology, functioning and neurocognition at baseline and follow-up. The mean length of follow-up was 7.26 years ( SD 3.05). Results Forty-one individuals with the poorest functional outcome were identified. Only 48.8% of this group had transitioned to psychosis. Poor functional outcome was associated with reduced performance at baseline in the specific neurocognitive domains of verbal learning and memory, processing speed and attention, and verbal fluency, but not global cognitive impairment. Reduced performance on a verbal story recall task, in combination with higher negative symptoms at baseline, was the best predictor of later poor outcome. Baseline positive psychotic symptoms and GAF scores were not associated with later poor outcome. Discussion To date, this is the longest follow-up study of an UHR sample. Poor functional outcome was associated with specific neurocognitive decrements, regardless of transition to psychosis. The detection of individuals with poor functioning at follow-up, against a background of previously identified risk factors for psychotic disorder, may yield a valid group in which to study biomarkers and treatment of schizophrenia.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0920-9964</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-2509</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.schres.2011.06.014</identifier><identifier>PMID: 21763109</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Amsterdam: Elsevier</publisher><subject>Adolescent ; Adult ; Adult and adolescent clinical studies ; Analysis of Variance ; Biological and medical sciences ; Cognition Disorders - diagnosis ; Cognition Disorders - etiology ; Cognition Disorders - psychology ; Disease Progression ; Female ; Humans ; Logistic Models ; Longitudinal Studies ; Male ; Medical sciences ; Neuropsychological Tests ; Other psychotic disorders ; Predictive Value of Tests ; Psychiatric Status Rating Scales ; Psychiatry ; Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry ; Psychopathology. Psychiatry ; Psychoses ; Psychotic Disorders - complications ; Psychotic Disorders - diagnosis ; Psychotic Disorders - psychology ; Quality of Life ; Retrospective Studies ; Risk Factors ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>Schizophrenia research, 2011-10, Vol.132 (1), p.1-7</ispartof><rights>Elsevier B.V.</rights><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright © 2011 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=24572634$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21763109$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Lin, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wood, S.J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nelson, B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brewer, W.J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Spiliotacopoulos, D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bruxner, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Broussard, C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pantelis, C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yung, A.R</creatorcontrib><title>Neurocognitive predictors of functional outcome two to 13 years after identification as ultra-high risk for psychosis</title><title>Schizophrenia research</title><addtitle>Schizophr Res</addtitle><description>Abstract Background and aim Little is known about the relationship between neurocognitive performance and functional outcome before the onset of frank psychosis. This longitudinal study aimed to investigate neurocognitive predictors of poor functional outcome in a group identified as ultra-high risk (UHR) for psychosis between two and 13 years prior. Method Individuals ( N = 230) identified as UHR for psychosis at the PACE Clinic in Melbourne completed assessment of psychopathology, functioning and neurocognition at baseline and follow-up. The mean length of follow-up was 7.26 years ( SD 3.05). Results Forty-one individuals with the poorest functional outcome were identified. Only 48.8% of this group had transitioned to psychosis. Poor functional outcome was associated with reduced performance at baseline in the specific neurocognitive domains of verbal learning and memory, processing speed and attention, and verbal fluency, but not global cognitive impairment. Reduced performance on a verbal story recall task, in combination with higher negative symptoms at baseline, was the best predictor of later poor outcome. Baseline positive psychotic symptoms and GAF scores were not associated with later poor outcome. Discussion To date, this is the longest follow-up study of an UHR sample. Poor functional outcome was associated with specific neurocognitive decrements, regardless of transition to psychosis. The detection of individuals with poor functioning at follow-up, against a background of previously identified risk factors for psychotic disorder, may yield a valid group in which to study biomarkers and treatment of schizophrenia.</description><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Adult and adolescent clinical studies</subject><subject>Analysis of Variance</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Cognition Disorders - diagnosis</subject><subject>Cognition Disorders - etiology</subject><subject>Cognition Disorders - psychology</subject><subject>Disease Progression</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Logistic Models</subject><subject>Longitudinal Studies</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Neuropsychological Tests</subject><subject>Other psychotic disorders</subject><subject>Predictive Value of Tests</subject><subject>Psychiatric Status Rating Scales</subject><subject>Psychiatry</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</subject><subject>Psychopathology. Psychiatry</subject><subject>Psychoses</subject><subject>Psychotic Disorders - complications</subject><subject>Psychotic Disorders - diagnosis</subject><subject>Psychotic Disorders - psychology</subject><subject>Quality of Life</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Risk Factors</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>0920-9964</issn><issn>1573-2509</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2011</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpF0cFuEzEQBmALgWgovAFCviBOu4zt9a59QUJVoUgVHIDzynHGjdPNOnjsorw9GzWopznMp5Hm_xl7K6AVIPqPu5b8NiO1EoRooW9BdM_YSuhBNVKDfc5WYCU01vbdBXtFtAMAoWF4yS6kGHolwK5Y_Y41J5_u5ljiA_JDxk30JWXiKfBQZ19imt3EUy0-7ZGXv4mXxIXiR3SLcqFg5nGDc4khenfi3BGvU8mu2ca7Lc-R7nlImR_o6LeJIr1mL4KbCN-c5yX7_eX619VNc_vj67erz7cNSqlL00kdrO-ENRZUQG0G79VgOgPr4MM6aBOM7b0xvQWrlR70EKRaL-uTAqcu2YfHu4ec_lSkMu4jeZwmN2OqNBpjOy11rxb57izreo-b8ZDj3uXj-D-pBbw_A0feTSG72Ud6cp0eZK-6xX16dLj89RAxj36K8xLMdI9HpF2qeYmTRjGSHGH8eeroVJEQAErYQf0DHASPgw</recordid><startdate>20111001</startdate><enddate>20111001</enddate><creator>Lin, A</creator><creator>Wood, S.J</creator><creator>Nelson, B</creator><creator>Brewer, W.J</creator><creator>Spiliotacopoulos, D</creator><creator>Bruxner, A</creator><creator>Broussard, C</creator><creator>Pantelis, C</creator><creator>Yung, A.R</creator><general>Elsevier</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20111001</creationdate><title>Neurocognitive predictors of functional outcome two to 13 years after identification as ultra-high risk for psychosis</title><author>Lin, A ; Wood, S.J ; Nelson, B ; Brewer, W.J ; Spiliotacopoulos, D ; Bruxner, A ; Broussard, C ; Pantelis, C ; Yung, A.R</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-e225t-425f9c4198903fe587cc378480bfcfbf58f896c886909535757f23b80b37840a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2011</creationdate><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Adult and adolescent clinical studies</topic><topic>Analysis of Variance</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Cognition Disorders - diagnosis</topic><topic>Cognition Disorders - etiology</topic><topic>Cognition Disorders - psychology</topic><topic>Disease Progression</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Logistic Models</topic><topic>Longitudinal Studies</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Neuropsychological Tests</topic><topic>Other psychotic disorders</topic><topic>Predictive Value of Tests</topic><topic>Psychiatric Status Rating Scales</topic><topic>Psychiatry</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</topic><topic>Psychopathology. Psychiatry</topic><topic>Psychoses</topic><topic>Psychotic Disorders - complications</topic><topic>Psychotic Disorders - diagnosis</topic><topic>Psychotic Disorders - psychology</topic><topic>Quality of Life</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Risk Factors</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Lin, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wood, S.J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nelson, B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brewer, W.J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Spiliotacopoulos, D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bruxner, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Broussard, C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pantelis, C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yung, A.R</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Schizophrenia research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Lin, A</au><au>Wood, S.J</au><au>Nelson, B</au><au>Brewer, W.J</au><au>Spiliotacopoulos, D</au><au>Bruxner, A</au><au>Broussard, C</au><au>Pantelis, C</au><au>Yung, A.R</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Neurocognitive predictors of functional outcome two to 13 years after identification as ultra-high risk for psychosis</atitle><jtitle>Schizophrenia research</jtitle><addtitle>Schizophr Res</addtitle><date>2011-10-01</date><risdate>2011</risdate><volume>132</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>1</spage><epage>7</epage><pages>1-7</pages><issn>0920-9964</issn><eissn>1573-2509</eissn><abstract>Abstract Background and aim Little is known about the relationship between neurocognitive performance and functional outcome before the onset of frank psychosis. This longitudinal study aimed to investigate neurocognitive predictors of poor functional outcome in a group identified as ultra-high risk (UHR) for psychosis between two and 13 years prior. Method Individuals ( N = 230) identified as UHR for psychosis at the PACE Clinic in Melbourne completed assessment of psychopathology, functioning and neurocognition at baseline and follow-up. The mean length of follow-up was 7.26 years ( SD 3.05). Results Forty-one individuals with the poorest functional outcome were identified. Only 48.8% of this group had transitioned to psychosis. Poor functional outcome was associated with reduced performance at baseline in the specific neurocognitive domains of verbal learning and memory, processing speed and attention, and verbal fluency, but not global cognitive impairment. Reduced performance on a verbal story recall task, in combination with higher negative symptoms at baseline, was the best predictor of later poor outcome. Baseline positive psychotic symptoms and GAF scores were not associated with later poor outcome. Discussion To date, this is the longest follow-up study of an UHR sample. Poor functional outcome was associated with specific neurocognitive decrements, regardless of transition to psychosis. The detection of individuals with poor functioning at follow-up, against a background of previously identified risk factors for psychotic disorder, may yield a valid group in which to study biomarkers and treatment of schizophrenia.</abstract><cop>Amsterdam</cop><pub>Elsevier</pub><pmid>21763109</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.schres.2011.06.014</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0920-9964
ispartof Schizophrenia research, 2011-10, Vol.132 (1), p.1-7
issn 0920-9964
1573-2509
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_889452563
source MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals
subjects Adolescent
Adult
Adult and adolescent clinical studies
Analysis of Variance
Biological and medical sciences
Cognition Disorders - diagnosis
Cognition Disorders - etiology
Cognition Disorders - psychology
Disease Progression
Female
Humans
Logistic Models
Longitudinal Studies
Male
Medical sciences
Neuropsychological Tests
Other psychotic disorders
Predictive Value of Tests
Psychiatric Status Rating Scales
Psychiatry
Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry
Psychopathology. Psychiatry
Psychoses
Psychotic Disorders - complications
Psychotic Disorders - diagnosis
Psychotic Disorders - psychology
Quality of Life
Retrospective Studies
Risk Factors
Young Adult
title Neurocognitive predictors of functional outcome two to 13 years after identification as ultra-high risk for psychosis
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-18T11%3A24%3A09IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Neurocognitive%20predictors%20of%20functional%20outcome%20two%20to%2013%20years%20after%20identification%20as%20ultra-high%20risk%20for%20psychosis&rft.jtitle=Schizophrenia%20research&rft.au=Lin,%20A&rft.date=2011-10-01&rft.volume=132&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=1&rft.epage=7&rft.pages=1-7&rft.issn=0920-9964&rft.eissn=1573-2509&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.schres.2011.06.014&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E889452563%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=889452563&rft_id=info:pmid/21763109&rft_els_id=1_s2_0_S0920996411003197&rfr_iscdi=true