Information source and valence: How information credibility influences earthquake risk perception

The present research aims at the relationship between information credibility and perception of seismic risk in a group of people living in severe disaster areas. 243 adult residents exposed to seismic hazard participated in a questionnaire study. With respect to four types of information which are...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of environmental psychology 2011-06, Vol.31 (2), p.129-136
Hauptverfasser: Zhu, Dongqing, Xie, Xiaofei, Gan, Yiqun
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 136
container_issue 2
container_start_page 129
container_title Journal of environmental psychology
container_volume 31
creator Zhu, Dongqing
Xie, Xiaofei
Gan, Yiqun
description The present research aims at the relationship between information credibility and perception of seismic risk in a group of people living in severe disaster areas. 243 adult residents exposed to seismic hazard participated in a questionnaire study. With respect to four types of information which are generated by information sources and valence, participants were instructed to recall one type of the information they obtained respectively and rate the recalled information in terms of its credibility. After that, they were asked to report their seismic risk perception and all socio-demographic data were also collected. Regression analyses suggested that information credibility significantly influenced risk perception. Furthermore, the credibility of word-of-mouth and negative information were positively associated with risk perception. Meanwhile, risk perception was also affected greatly by the credibility of negative public information but not positive word-of-mouth information. It was clear that both information source and valence moderated the process and the latter exerted a stronger influence on it. The results were interpreted in relation to the elaboration likelihood model, accessibility–diagnosticity model, and other cognitive theories. The findings were discussed in terms of their general implications for the improvement of risk communication about earthquake related messages. Figure  a demonstrated that there was a positive relationship only between word-of-mouth information credibility and risk perception ( β = .30, p  .05). Figure  b demonstrated that there was a positive relationship between negative information credibility and risk perception ( β= .47, p .05). [Display omitted] ► Information credibility influenced risk perception significantly. ► Information source and information valence moderates the relationship between information credibility and risk perception, and the latter had a stronger influence over the process. ► The credibility of word-of-mouth and negative information was positively associated with risk perception. ► Risk perception is affected greatly by the credibility of negative public information but not positive word-of-mouth information.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.jenvp.2010.09.005
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_889397111</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S027249441000085X</els_id><sourcerecordid>881453297</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c463t-716562095502b1379f8f92dab581759b4a052ca4da2f5a32e1c94a0e0ce56b9c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkEFLwzAYhoMoOKe_wEsv4qnzS9q0jeBBRN1g4EXP4Wv6FbN1bZe0k_17WyfiSTwFXp73_cjD2CWHGQee3KxmK6p37UzAkICaAcgjNuFSiFAlHI7ZBEQqwljF8Sk7834FACpSfMJwUZeN22BnmzrwTe8MBVgXwQ4rqg3dBvPmI7C_GOOosLmtbLcf86ofMR8Quu592-OaAmf9OmhpWGrHxjk7KbHydPH9Ttnb0-PrwzxcvjwvHu6XoYmTqAtTnshEgJISRM6jVJVZqUSBucx4KlUeI0hhMC5QlBIjQdyoISMwJJNcmWjKrg-7rWu2PflOb6w3VFVYU9N7nWXDj1PO-T9IHstIqHQgowNpXOO9o1K3zm7Q7TUHPZrXK_1lXo_mNSg9mB9aV9_76A1WpcPaWP9TFTHPFETj-t2Bo0HLzpLT3thRZ2EdmU4Xjf3zzifmN5up</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>881453297</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Information source and valence: How information credibility influences earthquake risk perception</title><source>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Zhu, Dongqing ; Xie, Xiaofei ; Gan, Yiqun</creator><creatorcontrib>Zhu, Dongqing ; Xie, Xiaofei ; Gan, Yiqun</creatorcontrib><description>The present research aims at the relationship between information credibility and perception of seismic risk in a group of people living in severe disaster areas. 243 adult residents exposed to seismic hazard participated in a questionnaire study. With respect to four types of information which are generated by information sources and valence, participants were instructed to recall one type of the information they obtained respectively and rate the recalled information in terms of its credibility. After that, they were asked to report their seismic risk perception and all socio-demographic data were also collected. Regression analyses suggested that information credibility significantly influenced risk perception. Furthermore, the credibility of word-of-mouth and negative information were positively associated with risk perception. Meanwhile, risk perception was also affected greatly by the credibility of negative public information but not positive word-of-mouth information. It was clear that both information source and valence moderated the process and the latter exerted a stronger influence on it. The results were interpreted in relation to the elaboration likelihood model, accessibility–diagnosticity model, and other cognitive theories. The findings were discussed in terms of their general implications for the improvement of risk communication about earthquake related messages. Figure  a demonstrated that there was a positive relationship only between word-of-mouth information credibility and risk perception ( β = .30, p &lt; .01), but the relationship was not significant for public information credibility ( β = .16, p &gt; .05). Figure  b demonstrated that there was a positive relationship between negative information credibility and risk perception ( β= .47, p&lt;.01), but no relationship for positive information credibility ( β = .03, p &gt; .05). [Display omitted] ► Information credibility influenced risk perception significantly. ► Information source and information valence moderates the relationship between information credibility and risk perception, and the latter had a stronger influence over the process. ► The credibility of word-of-mouth and negative information was positively associated with risk perception. ► Risk perception is affected greatly by the credibility of negative public information but not positive word-of-mouth information.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0272-4944</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1522-9610</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvp.2010.09.005</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JEPSEO</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Kidlington: Elsevier India Pvt Ltd</publisher><subject>Applied psychology ; Biological and medical sciences ; Cognitive theories ; Credibility ; Earthquakes ; Environment. Ecology ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Information credibility ; Information source ; Information sources ; Information valence ; Messages ; Perception ; Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry ; Psychology. Psychophysiology ; Recall ; Risk communication ; Risk perception ; Seismic engineering ; Seismic phenomena ; Sociodemographic data ; Wenchun earthquake</subject><ispartof>Journal of environmental psychology, 2011-06, Vol.31 (2), p.129-136</ispartof><rights>2010</rights><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c463t-716562095502b1379f8f92dab581759b4a052ca4da2f5a32e1c94a0e0ce56b9c3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c463t-716562095502b1379f8f92dab581759b4a052ca4da2f5a32e1c94a0e0ce56b9c3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S027249441000085X$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,30977,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=24189037$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Zhu, Dongqing</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Xie, Xiaofei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gan, Yiqun</creatorcontrib><title>Information source and valence: How information credibility influences earthquake risk perception</title><title>Journal of environmental psychology</title><description>The present research aims at the relationship between information credibility and perception of seismic risk in a group of people living in severe disaster areas. 243 adult residents exposed to seismic hazard participated in a questionnaire study. With respect to four types of information which are generated by information sources and valence, participants were instructed to recall one type of the information they obtained respectively and rate the recalled information in terms of its credibility. After that, they were asked to report their seismic risk perception and all socio-demographic data were also collected. Regression analyses suggested that information credibility significantly influenced risk perception. Furthermore, the credibility of word-of-mouth and negative information were positively associated with risk perception. Meanwhile, risk perception was also affected greatly by the credibility of negative public information but not positive word-of-mouth information. It was clear that both information source and valence moderated the process and the latter exerted a stronger influence on it. The results were interpreted in relation to the elaboration likelihood model, accessibility–diagnosticity model, and other cognitive theories. The findings were discussed in terms of their general implications for the improvement of risk communication about earthquake related messages. Figure  a demonstrated that there was a positive relationship only between word-of-mouth information credibility and risk perception ( β = .30, p &lt; .01), but the relationship was not significant for public information credibility ( β = .16, p &gt; .05). Figure  b demonstrated that there was a positive relationship between negative information credibility and risk perception ( β= .47, p&lt;.01), but no relationship for positive information credibility ( β = .03, p &gt; .05). [Display omitted] ► Information credibility influenced risk perception significantly. ► Information source and information valence moderates the relationship between information credibility and risk perception, and the latter had a stronger influence over the process. ► The credibility of word-of-mouth and negative information was positively associated with risk perception. ► Risk perception is affected greatly by the credibility of negative public information but not positive word-of-mouth information.</description><subject>Applied psychology</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Cognitive theories</subject><subject>Credibility</subject><subject>Earthquakes</subject><subject>Environment. Ecology</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Information credibility</subject><subject>Information source</subject><subject>Information sources</subject><subject>Information valence</subject><subject>Messages</subject><subject>Perception</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychophysiology</subject><subject>Recall</subject><subject>Risk communication</subject><subject>Risk perception</subject><subject>Seismic engineering</subject><subject>Seismic phenomena</subject><subject>Sociodemographic data</subject><subject>Wenchun earthquake</subject><issn>0272-4944</issn><issn>1522-9610</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2011</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkEFLwzAYhoMoOKe_wEsv4qnzS9q0jeBBRN1g4EXP4Wv6FbN1bZe0k_17WyfiSTwFXp73_cjD2CWHGQee3KxmK6p37UzAkICaAcgjNuFSiFAlHI7ZBEQqwljF8Sk7834FACpSfMJwUZeN22BnmzrwTe8MBVgXwQ4rqg3dBvPmI7C_GOOosLmtbLcf86ofMR8Quu592-OaAmf9OmhpWGrHxjk7KbHydPH9Ttnb0-PrwzxcvjwvHu6XoYmTqAtTnshEgJISRM6jVJVZqUSBucx4KlUeI0hhMC5QlBIjQdyoISMwJJNcmWjKrg-7rWu2PflOb6w3VFVYU9N7nWXDj1PO-T9IHstIqHQgowNpXOO9o1K3zm7Q7TUHPZrXK_1lXo_mNSg9mB9aV9_76A1WpcPaWP9TFTHPFETj-t2Bo0HLzpLT3thRZ2EdmU4Xjf3zzifmN5up</recordid><startdate>20110601</startdate><enddate>20110601</enddate><creator>Zhu, Dongqing</creator><creator>Xie, Xiaofei</creator><creator>Gan, Yiqun</creator><general>Elsevier India Pvt Ltd</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>KR7</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20110601</creationdate><title>Information source and valence: How information credibility influences earthquake risk perception</title><author>Zhu, Dongqing ; Xie, Xiaofei ; Gan, Yiqun</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c463t-716562095502b1379f8f92dab581759b4a052ca4da2f5a32e1c94a0e0ce56b9c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2011</creationdate><topic>Applied psychology</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Cognitive theories</topic><topic>Credibility</topic><topic>Earthquakes</topic><topic>Environment. Ecology</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Information credibility</topic><topic>Information source</topic><topic>Information sources</topic><topic>Information valence</topic><topic>Messages</topic><topic>Perception</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychophysiology</topic><topic>Recall</topic><topic>Risk communication</topic><topic>Risk perception</topic><topic>Seismic engineering</topic><topic>Seismic phenomena</topic><topic>Sociodemographic data</topic><topic>Wenchun earthquake</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Zhu, Dongqing</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Xie, Xiaofei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gan, Yiqun</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Journal of environmental psychology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Zhu, Dongqing</au><au>Xie, Xiaofei</au><au>Gan, Yiqun</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Information source and valence: How information credibility influences earthquake risk perception</atitle><jtitle>Journal of environmental psychology</jtitle><date>2011-06-01</date><risdate>2011</risdate><volume>31</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>129</spage><epage>136</epage><pages>129-136</pages><issn>0272-4944</issn><eissn>1522-9610</eissn><coden>JEPSEO</coden><abstract>The present research aims at the relationship between information credibility and perception of seismic risk in a group of people living in severe disaster areas. 243 adult residents exposed to seismic hazard participated in a questionnaire study. With respect to four types of information which are generated by information sources and valence, participants were instructed to recall one type of the information they obtained respectively and rate the recalled information in terms of its credibility. After that, they were asked to report their seismic risk perception and all socio-demographic data were also collected. Regression analyses suggested that information credibility significantly influenced risk perception. Furthermore, the credibility of word-of-mouth and negative information were positively associated with risk perception. Meanwhile, risk perception was also affected greatly by the credibility of negative public information but not positive word-of-mouth information. It was clear that both information source and valence moderated the process and the latter exerted a stronger influence on it. The results were interpreted in relation to the elaboration likelihood model, accessibility–diagnosticity model, and other cognitive theories. The findings were discussed in terms of their general implications for the improvement of risk communication about earthquake related messages. Figure  a demonstrated that there was a positive relationship only between word-of-mouth information credibility and risk perception ( β = .30, p &lt; .01), but the relationship was not significant for public information credibility ( β = .16, p &gt; .05). Figure  b demonstrated that there was a positive relationship between negative information credibility and risk perception ( β= .47, p&lt;.01), but no relationship for positive information credibility ( β = .03, p &gt; .05). [Display omitted] ► Information credibility influenced risk perception significantly. ► Information source and information valence moderates the relationship between information credibility and risk perception, and the latter had a stronger influence over the process. ► The credibility of word-of-mouth and negative information was positively associated with risk perception. ► Risk perception is affected greatly by the credibility of negative public information but not positive word-of-mouth information.</abstract><cop>Kidlington</cop><pub>Elsevier India Pvt Ltd</pub><doi>10.1016/j.jenvp.2010.09.005</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0272-4944
ispartof Journal of environmental psychology, 2011-06, Vol.31 (2), p.129-136
issn 0272-4944
1522-9610
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_889397111
source Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals
subjects Applied psychology
Biological and medical sciences
Cognitive theories
Credibility
Earthquakes
Environment. Ecology
Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology
Information credibility
Information source
Information sources
Information valence
Messages
Perception
Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry
Psychology. Psychophysiology
Recall
Risk communication
Risk perception
Seismic engineering
Seismic phenomena
Sociodemographic data
Wenchun earthquake
title Information source and valence: How information credibility influences earthquake risk perception
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-02T23%3A28%3A17IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Information%20source%20and%20valence:%20How%20information%20credibility%20influences%20earthquake%20risk%20perception&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20environmental%20psychology&rft.au=Zhu,%20Dongqing&rft.date=2011-06-01&rft.volume=31&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=129&rft.epage=136&rft.pages=129-136&rft.issn=0272-4944&rft.eissn=1522-9610&rft.coden=JEPSEO&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.jenvp.2010.09.005&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E881453297%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=881453297&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S027249441000085X&rfr_iscdi=true