Information source and valence: How information credibility influences earthquake risk perception
The present research aims at the relationship between information credibility and perception of seismic risk in a group of people living in severe disaster areas. 243 adult residents exposed to seismic hazard participated in a questionnaire study. With respect to four types of information which are...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of environmental psychology 2011-06, Vol.31 (2), p.129-136 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 136 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 129 |
container_title | Journal of environmental psychology |
container_volume | 31 |
creator | Zhu, Dongqing Xie, Xiaofei Gan, Yiqun |
description | The present research aims at the relationship between information credibility and perception of seismic risk in a group of people living in severe disaster areas. 243 adult residents exposed to seismic hazard participated in a questionnaire study. With respect to four types of information which are generated by information sources and valence, participants were instructed to recall one type of the information they obtained respectively and rate the recalled information in terms of its credibility. After that, they were asked to report their seismic risk perception and all socio-demographic data were also collected. Regression analyses suggested that information credibility significantly influenced risk perception. Furthermore, the credibility of word-of-mouth and negative information were positively associated with risk perception. Meanwhile, risk perception was also affected greatly by the credibility of negative public information but not positive word-of-mouth information. It was clear that both information source and valence moderated the process and the latter exerted a stronger influence on it. The results were interpreted in relation to the elaboration likelihood model, accessibility–diagnosticity model, and other cognitive theories. The findings were discussed in terms of their general implications for the improvement of risk communication about earthquake related messages.
Figure
a demonstrated that there was a positive relationship only between word-of-mouth information credibility and risk perception (
β = .30,
p .05). Figure
b demonstrated that there was a positive relationship between negative information credibility and risk perception (
β= .47,
p .05).
[Display omitted]
► Information credibility influenced risk perception significantly. ► Information source and information valence moderates the relationship between information credibility and risk perception, and the latter had a stronger influence over the process. ► The credibility of word-of-mouth and negative information was positively associated with risk perception. ► Risk perception is affected greatly by the credibility of negative public information but not positive word-of-mouth information. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.jenvp.2010.09.005 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_889397111</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S027249441000085X</els_id><sourcerecordid>881453297</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c463t-716562095502b1379f8f92dab581759b4a052ca4da2f5a32e1c94a0e0ce56b9c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkEFLwzAYhoMoOKe_wEsv4qnzS9q0jeBBRN1g4EXP4Wv6FbN1bZe0k_17WyfiSTwFXp73_cjD2CWHGQee3KxmK6p37UzAkICaAcgjNuFSiFAlHI7ZBEQqwljF8Sk7834FACpSfMJwUZeN22BnmzrwTe8MBVgXwQ4rqg3dBvPmI7C_GOOosLmtbLcf86ofMR8Quu592-OaAmf9OmhpWGrHxjk7KbHydPH9Ttnb0-PrwzxcvjwvHu6XoYmTqAtTnshEgJISRM6jVJVZqUSBucx4KlUeI0hhMC5QlBIjQdyoISMwJJNcmWjKrg-7rWu2PflOb6w3VFVYU9N7nWXDj1PO-T9IHstIqHQgowNpXOO9o1K3zm7Q7TUHPZrXK_1lXo_mNSg9mB9aV9_76A1WpcPaWP9TFTHPFETj-t2Bo0HLzpLT3thRZ2EdmU4Xjf3zzifmN5up</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>881453297</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Information source and valence: How information credibility influences earthquake risk perception</title><source>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Zhu, Dongqing ; Xie, Xiaofei ; Gan, Yiqun</creator><creatorcontrib>Zhu, Dongqing ; Xie, Xiaofei ; Gan, Yiqun</creatorcontrib><description>The present research aims at the relationship between information credibility and perception of seismic risk in a group of people living in severe disaster areas. 243 adult residents exposed to seismic hazard participated in a questionnaire study. With respect to four types of information which are generated by information sources and valence, participants were instructed to recall one type of the information they obtained respectively and rate the recalled information in terms of its credibility. After that, they were asked to report their seismic risk perception and all socio-demographic data were also collected. Regression analyses suggested that information credibility significantly influenced risk perception. Furthermore, the credibility of word-of-mouth and negative information were positively associated with risk perception. Meanwhile, risk perception was also affected greatly by the credibility of negative public information but not positive word-of-mouth information. It was clear that both information source and valence moderated the process and the latter exerted a stronger influence on it. The results were interpreted in relation to the elaboration likelihood model, accessibility–diagnosticity model, and other cognitive theories. The findings were discussed in terms of their general implications for the improvement of risk communication about earthquake related messages.
Figure
a demonstrated that there was a positive relationship only between word-of-mouth information credibility and risk perception (
β = .30,
p < .01), but the relationship was not significant for public information credibility (
β = .16,
p > .05). Figure
b demonstrated that there was a positive relationship between negative information credibility and risk perception (
β= .47,
p<.01), but no relationship for positive information credibility (
β = .03,
p > .05).
[Display omitted]
► Information credibility influenced risk perception significantly. ► Information source and information valence moderates the relationship between information credibility and risk perception, and the latter had a stronger influence over the process. ► The credibility of word-of-mouth and negative information was positively associated with risk perception. ► Risk perception is affected greatly by the credibility of negative public information but not positive word-of-mouth information.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0272-4944</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1522-9610</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvp.2010.09.005</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JEPSEO</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Kidlington: Elsevier India Pvt Ltd</publisher><subject>Applied psychology ; Biological and medical sciences ; Cognitive theories ; Credibility ; Earthquakes ; Environment. Ecology ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Information credibility ; Information source ; Information sources ; Information valence ; Messages ; Perception ; Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry ; Psychology. Psychophysiology ; Recall ; Risk communication ; Risk perception ; Seismic engineering ; Seismic phenomena ; Sociodemographic data ; Wenchun earthquake</subject><ispartof>Journal of environmental psychology, 2011-06, Vol.31 (2), p.129-136</ispartof><rights>2010</rights><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c463t-716562095502b1379f8f92dab581759b4a052ca4da2f5a32e1c94a0e0ce56b9c3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c463t-716562095502b1379f8f92dab581759b4a052ca4da2f5a32e1c94a0e0ce56b9c3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S027249441000085X$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,30977,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=24189037$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Zhu, Dongqing</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Xie, Xiaofei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gan, Yiqun</creatorcontrib><title>Information source and valence: How information credibility influences earthquake risk perception</title><title>Journal of environmental psychology</title><description>The present research aims at the relationship between information credibility and perception of seismic risk in a group of people living in severe disaster areas. 243 adult residents exposed to seismic hazard participated in a questionnaire study. With respect to four types of information which are generated by information sources and valence, participants were instructed to recall one type of the information they obtained respectively and rate the recalled information in terms of its credibility. After that, they were asked to report their seismic risk perception and all socio-demographic data were also collected. Regression analyses suggested that information credibility significantly influenced risk perception. Furthermore, the credibility of word-of-mouth and negative information were positively associated with risk perception. Meanwhile, risk perception was also affected greatly by the credibility of negative public information but not positive word-of-mouth information. It was clear that both information source and valence moderated the process and the latter exerted a stronger influence on it. The results were interpreted in relation to the elaboration likelihood model, accessibility–diagnosticity model, and other cognitive theories. The findings were discussed in terms of their general implications for the improvement of risk communication about earthquake related messages.
Figure
a demonstrated that there was a positive relationship only between word-of-mouth information credibility and risk perception (
β = .30,
p < .01), but the relationship was not significant for public information credibility (
β = .16,
p > .05). Figure
b demonstrated that there was a positive relationship between negative information credibility and risk perception (
β= .47,
p<.01), but no relationship for positive information credibility (
β = .03,
p > .05).
[Display omitted]
► Information credibility influenced risk perception significantly. ► Information source and information valence moderates the relationship between information credibility and risk perception, and the latter had a stronger influence over the process. ► The credibility of word-of-mouth and negative information was positively associated with risk perception. ► Risk perception is affected greatly by the credibility of negative public information but not positive word-of-mouth information.</description><subject>Applied psychology</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Cognitive theories</subject><subject>Credibility</subject><subject>Earthquakes</subject><subject>Environment. Ecology</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Information credibility</subject><subject>Information source</subject><subject>Information sources</subject><subject>Information valence</subject><subject>Messages</subject><subject>Perception</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychophysiology</subject><subject>Recall</subject><subject>Risk communication</subject><subject>Risk perception</subject><subject>Seismic engineering</subject><subject>Seismic phenomena</subject><subject>Sociodemographic data</subject><subject>Wenchun earthquake</subject><issn>0272-4944</issn><issn>1522-9610</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2011</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkEFLwzAYhoMoOKe_wEsv4qnzS9q0jeBBRN1g4EXP4Wv6FbN1bZe0k_17WyfiSTwFXp73_cjD2CWHGQee3KxmK6p37UzAkICaAcgjNuFSiFAlHI7ZBEQqwljF8Sk7834FACpSfMJwUZeN22BnmzrwTe8MBVgXwQ4rqg3dBvPmI7C_GOOosLmtbLcf86ofMR8Quu592-OaAmf9OmhpWGrHxjk7KbHydPH9Ttnb0-PrwzxcvjwvHu6XoYmTqAtTnshEgJISRM6jVJVZqUSBucx4KlUeI0hhMC5QlBIjQdyoISMwJJNcmWjKrg-7rWu2PflOb6w3VFVYU9N7nWXDj1PO-T9IHstIqHQgowNpXOO9o1K3zm7Q7TUHPZrXK_1lXo_mNSg9mB9aV9_76A1WpcPaWP9TFTHPFETj-t2Bo0HLzpLT3thRZ2EdmU4Xjf3zzifmN5up</recordid><startdate>20110601</startdate><enddate>20110601</enddate><creator>Zhu, Dongqing</creator><creator>Xie, Xiaofei</creator><creator>Gan, Yiqun</creator><general>Elsevier India Pvt Ltd</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>KR7</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20110601</creationdate><title>Information source and valence: How information credibility influences earthquake risk perception</title><author>Zhu, Dongqing ; Xie, Xiaofei ; Gan, Yiqun</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c463t-716562095502b1379f8f92dab581759b4a052ca4da2f5a32e1c94a0e0ce56b9c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2011</creationdate><topic>Applied psychology</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Cognitive theories</topic><topic>Credibility</topic><topic>Earthquakes</topic><topic>Environment. Ecology</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Information credibility</topic><topic>Information source</topic><topic>Information sources</topic><topic>Information valence</topic><topic>Messages</topic><topic>Perception</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychophysiology</topic><topic>Recall</topic><topic>Risk communication</topic><topic>Risk perception</topic><topic>Seismic engineering</topic><topic>Seismic phenomena</topic><topic>Sociodemographic data</topic><topic>Wenchun earthquake</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Zhu, Dongqing</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Xie, Xiaofei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gan, Yiqun</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Journal of environmental psychology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Zhu, Dongqing</au><au>Xie, Xiaofei</au><au>Gan, Yiqun</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Information source and valence: How information credibility influences earthquake risk perception</atitle><jtitle>Journal of environmental psychology</jtitle><date>2011-06-01</date><risdate>2011</risdate><volume>31</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>129</spage><epage>136</epage><pages>129-136</pages><issn>0272-4944</issn><eissn>1522-9610</eissn><coden>JEPSEO</coden><abstract>The present research aims at the relationship between information credibility and perception of seismic risk in a group of people living in severe disaster areas. 243 adult residents exposed to seismic hazard participated in a questionnaire study. With respect to four types of information which are generated by information sources and valence, participants were instructed to recall one type of the information they obtained respectively and rate the recalled information in terms of its credibility. After that, they were asked to report their seismic risk perception and all socio-demographic data were also collected. Regression analyses suggested that information credibility significantly influenced risk perception. Furthermore, the credibility of word-of-mouth and negative information were positively associated with risk perception. Meanwhile, risk perception was also affected greatly by the credibility of negative public information but not positive word-of-mouth information. It was clear that both information source and valence moderated the process and the latter exerted a stronger influence on it. The results were interpreted in relation to the elaboration likelihood model, accessibility–diagnosticity model, and other cognitive theories. The findings were discussed in terms of their general implications for the improvement of risk communication about earthquake related messages.
Figure
a demonstrated that there was a positive relationship only between word-of-mouth information credibility and risk perception (
β = .30,
p < .01), but the relationship was not significant for public information credibility (
β = .16,
p > .05). Figure
b demonstrated that there was a positive relationship between negative information credibility and risk perception (
β= .47,
p<.01), but no relationship for positive information credibility (
β = .03,
p > .05).
[Display omitted]
► Information credibility influenced risk perception significantly. ► Information source and information valence moderates the relationship between information credibility and risk perception, and the latter had a stronger influence over the process. ► The credibility of word-of-mouth and negative information was positively associated with risk perception. ► Risk perception is affected greatly by the credibility of negative public information but not positive word-of-mouth information.</abstract><cop>Kidlington</cop><pub>Elsevier India Pvt Ltd</pub><doi>10.1016/j.jenvp.2010.09.005</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0272-4944 |
ispartof | Journal of environmental psychology, 2011-06, Vol.31 (2), p.129-136 |
issn | 0272-4944 1522-9610 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_889397111 |
source | Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals |
subjects | Applied psychology Biological and medical sciences Cognitive theories Credibility Earthquakes Environment. Ecology Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology Information credibility Information source Information sources Information valence Messages Perception Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry Psychology. Psychophysiology Recall Risk communication Risk perception Seismic engineering Seismic phenomena Sociodemographic data Wenchun earthquake |
title | Information source and valence: How information credibility influences earthquake risk perception |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-02T23%3A28%3A17IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Information%20source%20and%20valence:%20How%20information%20credibility%20influences%20earthquake%20risk%20perception&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20environmental%20psychology&rft.au=Zhu,%20Dongqing&rft.date=2011-06-01&rft.volume=31&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=129&rft.epage=136&rft.pages=129-136&rft.issn=0272-4944&rft.eissn=1522-9610&rft.coden=JEPSEO&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.jenvp.2010.09.005&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E881453297%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=881453297&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S027249441000085X&rfr_iscdi=true |