Comparing image quality of print-on-demand books and photobooks from web-based vendors

Because of the emergence of e-commerce and developments in print engines designed for economical output of very short runs, there are increased business opportunities and consumer options for print-on-demand books and photobooks. The current state of these printing modes allows for direct uploading...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of electronic imaging 2010-01, Vol.19 (1), p.011013-011013
Hauptverfasser: Phillips, Jonathan B, Bajorski, Peter, Burns, Peter D, Fredericks, Erin P, Rosen, Mitchell R
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 011013
container_issue 1
container_start_page 011013
container_title Journal of electronic imaging
container_volume 19
creator Phillips, Jonathan B
Bajorski, Peter
Burns, Peter D
Fredericks, Erin P
Rosen, Mitchell R
description Because of the emergence of e-commerce and developments in print engines designed for economical output of very short runs, there are increased business opportunities and consumer options for print-on-demand books and photobooks. The current state of these printing modes allows for direct uploading of book files via the web, printing on nonoffset printers, and distributing by standard parcel or mail delivery services. The goal of this research is to assess the image quality of print-on-demand books and photobooks produced by various Web-based vendors and to identify correlations between psychophysical results and objective metrics. Six vendors were identified for one-off (single-copy) print-on-demand books, and seven vendors were identified for photobooks. Participants rank ordered overall quality of a subset of individual pages from each book, where the pages included text, photographs, or a combination of the two. Observers also reported overall quality ratings and price estimates for the bound books. Objective metrics of color gamut, color accuracy, accuracy of International Color Consortium profile usage, eye-weighted root mean square L , and cascaded modulation transfer acutance were obtained and compared to the observer responses. We introduce some new methods for normalizing data as well as for strengthening the statistical significance of the results. Our approach includes the use of latent mixed-effect models. We found statistically significant correlation with overall image quality and some of the spatial metrics, but correlations between psychophysical results and other objective metrics were weak or nonexistent. Strong correlation was found between psychophysical results of overall quality assessment and estimated price associated with quality. The photobook set of vendors reached higher image-quality ratings than the set of print-on-demand vendors. However, the photobook set had higher image-quality variability.
doi_str_mv 10.1117/1.3271167
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_889396339</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>889396339</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c264t-a13568a503462fa3b08069a01051d71eb1e29ae11f42901e9e21ab90ecf885d73</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo9kM1OwzAQhC0EEqVw4A18Qxxcdu38-YiqAkVFXABxi5xkXQJJnMYpqG9PSir2MrOrTyvNMHaJMEPE-AZnSsaIUXzEJhhGIKTU78eDB4yF1qBP2Zn3nwCISYAT9jZ3dWu6slnzsjZr4putqcp-x53l7XDuhWtEQbVpCp459-X53rUfrnfjajtX8x_KRGY8FfybmsJ1_pydWFN5ujjolL3eLV7mD2L1fL-c365ELqOgFwZVGCUmBBVE0hqVQQKRNoAQYhEjZUhSG0K0gdSApEmiyTRQbpMkLGI1ZVfj37Zzmy35Pq1Ln1NVmYbc1qdJopWOlNIDeT2Seee878imQ7zadLsUId1Xl2J6qG5g5cj6tqR_7nGxfFqEMAxq-JOhREA1evULcDlt9w</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>889396339</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparing image quality of print-on-demand books and photobooks from web-based vendors</title><source>SPIE Digital Library (Journals)</source><creator>Phillips, Jonathan B ; Bajorski, Peter ; Burns, Peter D ; Fredericks, Erin P ; Rosen, Mitchell R</creator><creatorcontrib>Phillips, Jonathan B ; Bajorski, Peter ; Burns, Peter D ; Fredericks, Erin P ; Rosen, Mitchell R</creatorcontrib><description>Because of the emergence of e-commerce and developments in print engines designed for economical output of very short runs, there are increased business opportunities and consumer options for print-on-demand books and photobooks. The current state of these printing modes allows for direct uploading of book files via the web, printing on nonoffset printers, and distributing by standard parcel or mail delivery services. The goal of this research is to assess the image quality of print-on-demand books and photobooks produced by various Web-based vendors and to identify correlations between psychophysical results and objective metrics. Six vendors were identified for one-off (single-copy) print-on-demand books, and seven vendors were identified for photobooks. Participants rank ordered overall quality of a subset of individual pages from each book, where the pages included text, photographs, or a combination of the two. Observers also reported overall quality ratings and price estimates for the bound books. Objective metrics of color gamut, color accuracy, accuracy of International Color Consortium profile usage, eye-weighted root mean square L , and cascaded modulation transfer acutance were obtained and compared to the observer responses. We introduce some new methods for normalizing data as well as for strengthening the statistical significance of the results. Our approach includes the use of latent mixed-effect models. We found statistically significant correlation with overall image quality and some of the spatial metrics, but correlations between psychophysical results and other objective metrics were weak or nonexistent. Strong correlation was found between psychophysical results of overall quality assessment and estimated price associated with quality. The photobook set of vendors reached higher image-quality ratings than the set of print-on-demand vendors. However, the photobook set had higher image-quality variability.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1017-9909</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1560-229X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1117/1.3271167</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JEIME5</identifier><language>eng</language><subject>Accuracy ; Color ; Correlation ; Image quality ; Observers ; Ratings ; World Wide Web</subject><ispartof>Journal of electronic imaging, 2010-01, Vol.19 (1), p.011013-011013</ispartof><rights>2011 COPYRIGHT SPIE--The International Society for Optical Engineering. Downloading of the abstract is permitted for personal use only.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c264t-a13568a503462fa3b08069a01051d71eb1e29ae11f42901e9e21ab90ecf885d73</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.spiedigitallibrary.org/journalArticle/Download?urlId=10.1117/1.3271167$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspie$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1117/1.3271167$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspie$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,18965,27924,27925,55386,55387</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Phillips, Jonathan B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bajorski, Peter</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Burns, Peter D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fredericks, Erin P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rosen, Mitchell R</creatorcontrib><title>Comparing image quality of print-on-demand books and photobooks from web-based vendors</title><title>Journal of electronic imaging</title><description>Because of the emergence of e-commerce and developments in print engines designed for economical output of very short runs, there are increased business opportunities and consumer options for print-on-demand books and photobooks. The current state of these printing modes allows for direct uploading of book files via the web, printing on nonoffset printers, and distributing by standard parcel or mail delivery services. The goal of this research is to assess the image quality of print-on-demand books and photobooks produced by various Web-based vendors and to identify correlations between psychophysical results and objective metrics. Six vendors were identified for one-off (single-copy) print-on-demand books, and seven vendors were identified for photobooks. Participants rank ordered overall quality of a subset of individual pages from each book, where the pages included text, photographs, or a combination of the two. Observers also reported overall quality ratings and price estimates for the bound books. Objective metrics of color gamut, color accuracy, accuracy of International Color Consortium profile usage, eye-weighted root mean square L , and cascaded modulation transfer acutance were obtained and compared to the observer responses. We introduce some new methods for normalizing data as well as for strengthening the statistical significance of the results. Our approach includes the use of latent mixed-effect models. We found statistically significant correlation with overall image quality and some of the spatial metrics, but correlations between psychophysical results and other objective metrics were weak or nonexistent. Strong correlation was found between psychophysical results of overall quality assessment and estimated price associated with quality. The photobook set of vendors reached higher image-quality ratings than the set of print-on-demand vendors. However, the photobook set had higher image-quality variability.</description><subject>Accuracy</subject><subject>Color</subject><subject>Correlation</subject><subject>Image quality</subject><subject>Observers</subject><subject>Ratings</subject><subject>World Wide Web</subject><issn>1017-9909</issn><issn>1560-229X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2010</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNo9kM1OwzAQhC0EEqVw4A18Qxxcdu38-YiqAkVFXABxi5xkXQJJnMYpqG9PSir2MrOrTyvNMHaJMEPE-AZnSsaIUXzEJhhGIKTU78eDB4yF1qBP2Zn3nwCISYAT9jZ3dWu6slnzsjZr4putqcp-x53l7XDuhWtEQbVpCp459-X53rUfrnfjajtX8x_KRGY8FfybmsJ1_pydWFN5ujjolL3eLV7mD2L1fL-c365ELqOgFwZVGCUmBBVE0hqVQQKRNoAQYhEjZUhSG0K0gdSApEmiyTRQbpMkLGI1ZVfj37Zzmy35Pq1Ln1NVmYbc1qdJopWOlNIDeT2Seee878imQ7zadLsUId1Xl2J6qG5g5cj6tqR_7nGxfFqEMAxq-JOhREA1evULcDlt9w</recordid><startdate>20100101</startdate><enddate>20100101</enddate><creator>Phillips, Jonathan B</creator><creator>Bajorski, Peter</creator><creator>Burns, Peter D</creator><creator>Fredericks, Erin P</creator><creator>Rosen, Mitchell R</creator><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SC</scope><scope>7SP</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>L~C</scope><scope>L~D</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20100101</creationdate><title>Comparing image quality of print-on-demand books and photobooks from web-based vendors</title><author>Phillips, Jonathan B ; Bajorski, Peter ; Burns, Peter D ; Fredericks, Erin P ; Rosen, Mitchell R</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c264t-a13568a503462fa3b08069a01051d71eb1e29ae11f42901e9e21ab90ecf885d73</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2010</creationdate><topic>Accuracy</topic><topic>Color</topic><topic>Correlation</topic><topic>Image quality</topic><topic>Observers</topic><topic>Ratings</topic><topic>World Wide Web</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Phillips, Jonathan B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bajorski, Peter</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Burns, Peter D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fredericks, Erin P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rosen, Mitchell R</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts</collection><collection>Electronics &amp; Communications Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts – Academic</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Professional</collection><jtitle>Journal of electronic imaging</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Phillips, Jonathan B</au><au>Bajorski, Peter</au><au>Burns, Peter D</au><au>Fredericks, Erin P</au><au>Rosen, Mitchell R</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparing image quality of print-on-demand books and photobooks from web-based vendors</atitle><jtitle>Journal of electronic imaging</jtitle><date>2010-01-01</date><risdate>2010</risdate><volume>19</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>011013</spage><epage>011013</epage><pages>011013-011013</pages><issn>1017-9909</issn><eissn>1560-229X</eissn><coden>JEIME5</coden><abstract>Because of the emergence of e-commerce and developments in print engines designed for economical output of very short runs, there are increased business opportunities and consumer options for print-on-demand books and photobooks. The current state of these printing modes allows for direct uploading of book files via the web, printing on nonoffset printers, and distributing by standard parcel or mail delivery services. The goal of this research is to assess the image quality of print-on-demand books and photobooks produced by various Web-based vendors and to identify correlations between psychophysical results and objective metrics. Six vendors were identified for one-off (single-copy) print-on-demand books, and seven vendors were identified for photobooks. Participants rank ordered overall quality of a subset of individual pages from each book, where the pages included text, photographs, or a combination of the two. Observers also reported overall quality ratings and price estimates for the bound books. Objective metrics of color gamut, color accuracy, accuracy of International Color Consortium profile usage, eye-weighted root mean square L , and cascaded modulation transfer acutance were obtained and compared to the observer responses. We introduce some new methods for normalizing data as well as for strengthening the statistical significance of the results. Our approach includes the use of latent mixed-effect models. We found statistically significant correlation with overall image quality and some of the spatial metrics, but correlations between psychophysical results and other objective metrics were weak or nonexistent. Strong correlation was found between psychophysical results of overall quality assessment and estimated price associated with quality. The photobook set of vendors reached higher image-quality ratings than the set of print-on-demand vendors. However, the photobook set had higher image-quality variability.</abstract><doi>10.1117/1.3271167</doi><tpages>1</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1017-9909
ispartof Journal of electronic imaging, 2010-01, Vol.19 (1), p.011013-011013
issn 1017-9909
1560-229X
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_889396339
source SPIE Digital Library (Journals)
subjects Accuracy
Color
Correlation
Image quality
Observers
Ratings
World Wide Web
title Comparing image quality of print-on-demand books and photobooks from web-based vendors
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-05T18%3A19%3A10IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparing%20image%20quality%20of%20print-on-demand%20books%20and%20photobooks%20from%20web-based%20vendors&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20electronic%20imaging&rft.au=Phillips,%20Jonathan%20B&rft.date=2010-01-01&rft.volume=19&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=011013&rft.epage=011013&rft.pages=011013-011013&rft.issn=1017-9909&rft.eissn=1560-229X&rft.coden=JEIME5&rft_id=info:doi/10.1117/1.3271167&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E889396339%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=889396339&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true