Spatial updating across saccades during manual interception

We studied the effect of intervening saccades on the manual interception of a moving target. Previous studies suggest that stationary reach goals are coded and updated across saccades in gaze-centered coordinates, but whether this generalizes to interception is unknown. Subjects (n = 9) reached to m...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of vision (Charlottesville, Va.) Va.), 2011-09, Vol.11 (10), p.4-4
Hauptverfasser: Dessing, Joost C, Crawford, J Douglas, Medendorp, W Pieter
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 4
container_issue 10
container_start_page 4
container_title Journal of vision (Charlottesville, Va.)
container_volume 11
creator Dessing, Joost C
Crawford, J Douglas
Medendorp, W Pieter
description We studied the effect of intervening saccades on the manual interception of a moving target. Previous studies suggest that stationary reach goals are coded and updated across saccades in gaze-centered coordinates, but whether this generalizes to interception is unknown. Subjects (n = 9) reached to manually intercept a moving target after it was rendered invisible. Subjects either fixated throughout the trial or made a saccade before reaching (both fixation points were in the range of -10° to 10°). Consistent with previous findings and our control experiment with stationary targets, the interception errors depended on the direction of the remembered moving goal relative to the new eye position, as if the target is coded and updated across the saccade in gaze-centered coordinates. However, our results were also more variable in that the interception errors for more than half of our subjects also depended on the goal direction relative to the initial gaze direction. This suggests that the feedforward transformations for interception differ from those for stationary targets. Our analyses show that the interception errors reflect a combination of biases in the (gaze-centered) representation of target motion and in the transformation of goal information into body-centered coordinates for action.
doi_str_mv 10.1167/11.10.4
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_888340918</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>888340918</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c383t-acd90563786b780e61799befd05bb725470d32685bbc5544e3b8b9bb6492fdd83</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpNkMlKxEAQhhtRnHEU30By85Sxeu_GkwzjAgMe1HPoLRLJZndy8O1NdJS5VH1VfBTUj9AlhjXGQt5gvJ6QHaEl5pTlkgpyfMALdJbSBwABDvgULQjWAFSSJbp96c1QmTobez9B-54ZF7uUsmScMz6kzI9xXjemHSetaocQXeiHqmvP0Ulp6hQu9n2F3u63r5vHfPf88LS52-WOKjrkxnkNXFCphJUKgsBSaxtKD9xaSTiT4CkRapoc54wFapXV1gqmSem9oit0_Xu3j93nGNJQNFVyoa5NG7oxFUopykDjA_PnhxjKoo9VY-JXgaGYg5rKjGwyr_Y3R9sE_-_9JUO_AcaWYcs</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>888340918</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Spatial updating across saccades during manual interception</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Dessing, Joost C ; Crawford, J Douglas ; Medendorp, W Pieter</creator><creatorcontrib>Dessing, Joost C ; Crawford, J Douglas ; Medendorp, W Pieter</creatorcontrib><description>We studied the effect of intervening saccades on the manual interception of a moving target. Previous studies suggest that stationary reach goals are coded and updated across saccades in gaze-centered coordinates, but whether this generalizes to interception is unknown. Subjects (n = 9) reached to manually intercept a moving target after it was rendered invisible. Subjects either fixated throughout the trial or made a saccade before reaching (both fixation points were in the range of -10° to 10°). Consistent with previous findings and our control experiment with stationary targets, the interception errors depended on the direction of the remembered moving goal relative to the new eye position, as if the target is coded and updated across the saccade in gaze-centered coordinates. However, our results were also more variable in that the interception errors for more than half of our subjects also depended on the goal direction relative to the initial gaze direction. This suggests that the feedforward transformations for interception differ from those for stationary targets. Our analyses show that the interception errors reflect a combination of biases in the (gaze-centered) representation of target motion and in the transformation of goal information into body-centered coordinates for action.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1534-7362</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1534-7362</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1167/11.10.4</identifier><identifier>PMID: 21900372</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States</publisher><subject>Adult ; Female ; Fixation, Ocular - physiology ; Humans ; Linear Models ; Male ; Models, Neurological ; Photic Stimulation - methods ; Psychomotor Performance - physiology ; Saccades - physiology ; Space Perception - physiology ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>Journal of vision (Charlottesville, Va.), 2011-09, Vol.11 (10), p.4-4</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c383t-acd90563786b780e61799befd05bb725470d32685bbc5544e3b8b9bb6492fdd83</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,860,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21900372$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Dessing, Joost C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Crawford, J Douglas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Medendorp, W Pieter</creatorcontrib><title>Spatial updating across saccades during manual interception</title><title>Journal of vision (Charlottesville, Va.)</title><addtitle>J Vis</addtitle><description>We studied the effect of intervening saccades on the manual interception of a moving target. Previous studies suggest that stationary reach goals are coded and updated across saccades in gaze-centered coordinates, but whether this generalizes to interception is unknown. Subjects (n = 9) reached to manually intercept a moving target after it was rendered invisible. Subjects either fixated throughout the trial or made a saccade before reaching (both fixation points were in the range of -10° to 10°). Consistent with previous findings and our control experiment with stationary targets, the interception errors depended on the direction of the remembered moving goal relative to the new eye position, as if the target is coded and updated across the saccade in gaze-centered coordinates. However, our results were also more variable in that the interception errors for more than half of our subjects also depended on the goal direction relative to the initial gaze direction. This suggests that the feedforward transformations for interception differ from those for stationary targets. Our analyses show that the interception errors reflect a combination of biases in the (gaze-centered) representation of target motion and in the transformation of goal information into body-centered coordinates for action.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Fixation, Ocular - physiology</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Linear Models</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Models, Neurological</subject><subject>Photic Stimulation - methods</subject><subject>Psychomotor Performance - physiology</subject><subject>Saccades - physiology</subject><subject>Space Perception - physiology</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>1534-7362</issn><issn>1534-7362</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2011</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpNkMlKxEAQhhtRnHEU30By85Sxeu_GkwzjAgMe1HPoLRLJZndy8O1NdJS5VH1VfBTUj9AlhjXGQt5gvJ6QHaEl5pTlkgpyfMALdJbSBwABDvgULQjWAFSSJbp96c1QmTobez9B-54ZF7uUsmScMz6kzI9xXjemHSetaocQXeiHqmvP0Ulp6hQu9n2F3u63r5vHfPf88LS52-WOKjrkxnkNXFCphJUKgsBSaxtKD9xaSTiT4CkRapoc54wFapXV1gqmSem9oit0_Xu3j93nGNJQNFVyoa5NG7oxFUopykDjA_PnhxjKoo9VY-JXgaGYg5rKjGwyr_Y3R9sE_-_9JUO_AcaWYcs</recordid><startdate>20110901</startdate><enddate>20110901</enddate><creator>Dessing, Joost C</creator><creator>Crawford, J Douglas</creator><creator>Medendorp, W Pieter</creator><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20110901</creationdate><title>Spatial updating across saccades during manual interception</title><author>Dessing, Joost C ; Crawford, J Douglas ; Medendorp, W Pieter</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c383t-acd90563786b780e61799befd05bb725470d32685bbc5544e3b8b9bb6492fdd83</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2011</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Fixation, Ocular - physiology</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Linear Models</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Models, Neurological</topic><topic>Photic Stimulation - methods</topic><topic>Psychomotor Performance - physiology</topic><topic>Saccades - physiology</topic><topic>Space Perception - physiology</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Dessing, Joost C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Crawford, J Douglas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Medendorp, W Pieter</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of vision (Charlottesville, Va.)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Dessing, Joost C</au><au>Crawford, J Douglas</au><au>Medendorp, W Pieter</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Spatial updating across saccades during manual interception</atitle><jtitle>Journal of vision (Charlottesville, Va.)</jtitle><addtitle>J Vis</addtitle><date>2011-09-01</date><risdate>2011</risdate><volume>11</volume><issue>10</issue><spage>4</spage><epage>4</epage><pages>4-4</pages><issn>1534-7362</issn><eissn>1534-7362</eissn><abstract>We studied the effect of intervening saccades on the manual interception of a moving target. Previous studies suggest that stationary reach goals are coded and updated across saccades in gaze-centered coordinates, but whether this generalizes to interception is unknown. Subjects (n = 9) reached to manually intercept a moving target after it was rendered invisible. Subjects either fixated throughout the trial or made a saccade before reaching (both fixation points were in the range of -10° to 10°). Consistent with previous findings and our control experiment with stationary targets, the interception errors depended on the direction of the remembered moving goal relative to the new eye position, as if the target is coded and updated across the saccade in gaze-centered coordinates. However, our results were also more variable in that the interception errors for more than half of our subjects also depended on the goal direction relative to the initial gaze direction. This suggests that the feedforward transformations for interception differ from those for stationary targets. Our analyses show that the interception errors reflect a combination of biases in the (gaze-centered) representation of target motion and in the transformation of goal information into body-centered coordinates for action.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pmid>21900372</pmid><doi>10.1167/11.10.4</doi><tpages>1</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1534-7362
ispartof Journal of vision (Charlottesville, Va.), 2011-09, Vol.11 (10), p.4-4
issn 1534-7362
1534-7362
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_888340918
source MEDLINE; DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; PubMed Central
subjects Adult
Female
Fixation, Ocular - physiology
Humans
Linear Models
Male
Models, Neurological
Photic Stimulation - methods
Psychomotor Performance - physiology
Saccades - physiology
Space Perception - physiology
Young Adult
title Spatial updating across saccades during manual interception
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-03T14%3A24%3A24IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Spatial%20updating%20across%20saccades%20during%20manual%20interception&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20vision%20(Charlottesville,%20Va.)&rft.au=Dessing,%20Joost%20C&rft.date=2011-09-01&rft.volume=11&rft.issue=10&rft.spage=4&rft.epage=4&rft.pages=4-4&rft.issn=1534-7362&rft.eissn=1534-7362&rft_id=info:doi/10.1167/11.10.4&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E888340918%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=888340918&rft_id=info:pmid/21900372&rfr_iscdi=true