Methodologies for quantifying culturable, viable, and total Legionella pneumophila in indoor air

Legionella pneumophila, aerosolized from numerous indoor facilities (e.g., shower heads, hot tubs, spas), may cause Pontiac fever (PF) and lethal pneumonia named Legionnaires’ disease (LD) in humans. Reliable methods on quantitative exposure assessment of this bioaerosol are essential for the preven...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Indoor air 2011-08, Vol.21 (4), p.291-299
Hauptverfasser: Chang, C.-W., Chou, F.-C.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 299
container_issue 4
container_start_page 291
container_title Indoor air
container_volume 21
creator Chang, C.-W.
Chou, F.-C.
description Legionella pneumophila, aerosolized from numerous indoor facilities (e.g., shower heads, hot tubs, spas), may cause Pontiac fever (PF) and lethal pneumonia named Legionnaires’ disease (LD) in humans. Reliable methods on quantitative exposure assessment of this bioaerosol are essential for the prevention of PF and LD. Coupled with culture, ethidium monoazide with qPCR, and qPCR assays, the collection efficiency for culturable, viable, and total L. pneumophila was assessed by means of filtration sampling (IOM with gelatin filter and cassette with polycarbonate filter) and liquid‐based sampling methods (BioSampler, AGI‐30, MAS‐100 sampler with Tween mixture and deionized water (DW)). Results show IOM/gelatin filter was comparable to cassette/polycarbonate filter (P = 0.33) and performed greater than all of tested liquid‐based methods for total cell collection. On the other hand, IOM/gelatin filter obtained greater efficiencies than cassette/polycarbonate filter by a factor of 3.8–8.6 for viable cells (P = 0.0006) and two orders of magnitude for culturable cells (P = 0.00002). Further comparison between liquid impingement and filtration methods indicates the sampling by IOM/gelatin filter, AGI‐30, and BioSampler with DW were the most appropriate for viable cells, while culturable cells were collected most efficiently by BioSampler/DW with periodical replenishment during the sampling. Practical Implications This study recommends the most suitable methodologies for quantifying culturable, viable, and total Legionella pneumophila in indoor air. By using appropriate sampling and analytical methods, the residents and building owners are able to obtain the reliable data and further characterize the exposure risk and/or intervention efficacy against L. pneumophila. Moreover, the adoption of suitable monitoring methods also assists the investigators to explore the sources linked to PF and LD during the outbreaks. Considering reliable microbial monitoring is fundamental for epidemiological survey and risk assessment, the present information should be taken into account in assessing L. pneumophila indoors.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/j.1600-0668.2010.00701.x
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_888112758</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3372079481</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4991-f7d510f8a38d50d030965312e7069e935d91a219d4be06d3d5c254aed1a46e563</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkU1vEzEQhi0EoqHwF9BKHODAhpn111riUkW0FKVF4kNIXAYn9qYOm3W6H5D8e7yk5MABLEsz8jzvjEcvYxnCFNN5tZ6iAshBqXJaQHoF0IDT3T02ORbuswkYkLkyQp-wR123BkDNDX_ITgpEU5almbBvV76_iS7WcRV8l1WxzW4H2_Sh2odmlS2Huh9au6j9y-xHOETbuKyPva2zuV-F2Pi6ttm28cMmbm9CykOTrouplQ3tY_agsnXnn9zFU_b5_M2n2dt8_v7icnY2z5fCGMwr7SRCVVpeOgkOOBglORZegzLecOkM2gKNEwsPynEnl4UU1ju0Qnmp-Cl7fui7bePt4LueNqFbjn9rfBw6SusiFlqW_ye11IXgiifyxT9J1FqjAIPj-Gd_oes4tE3amFAKYRB1YRL19I4aFhvvaNuGjW339MePBLw-AD9D7ffHOgKNvtOaRntptJdG3-m377Sjy-uzlCR5fpCHrve7o9y230lpriV9ub6gD--uYPb1vKSP_BdIj63a</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1544911729</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Methodologies for quantifying culturable, viable, and total Legionella pneumophila in indoor air</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library All Journals</source><creator>Chang, C.-W. ; Chou, F.-C.</creator><creatorcontrib>Chang, C.-W. ; Chou, F.-C.</creatorcontrib><description>Legionella pneumophila, aerosolized from numerous indoor facilities (e.g., shower heads, hot tubs, spas), may cause Pontiac fever (PF) and lethal pneumonia named Legionnaires’ disease (LD) in humans. Reliable methods on quantitative exposure assessment of this bioaerosol are essential for the prevention of PF and LD. Coupled with culture, ethidium monoazide with qPCR, and qPCR assays, the collection efficiency for culturable, viable, and total L. pneumophila was assessed by means of filtration sampling (IOM with gelatin filter and cassette with polycarbonate filter) and liquid‐based sampling methods (BioSampler, AGI‐30, MAS‐100 sampler with Tween mixture and deionized water (DW)). Results show IOM/gelatin filter was comparable to cassette/polycarbonate filter (P = 0.33) and performed greater than all of tested liquid‐based methods for total cell collection. On the other hand, IOM/gelatin filter obtained greater efficiencies than cassette/polycarbonate filter by a factor of 3.8–8.6 for viable cells (P = 0.0006) and two orders of magnitude for culturable cells (P = 0.00002). Further comparison between liquid impingement and filtration methods indicates the sampling by IOM/gelatin filter, AGI‐30, and BioSampler with DW were the most appropriate for viable cells, while culturable cells were collected most efficiently by BioSampler/DW with periodical replenishment during the sampling. Practical Implications This study recommends the most suitable methodologies for quantifying culturable, viable, and total Legionella pneumophila in indoor air. By using appropriate sampling and analytical methods, the residents and building owners are able to obtain the reliable data and further characterize the exposure risk and/or intervention efficacy against L. pneumophila. Moreover, the adoption of suitable monitoring methods also assists the investigators to explore the sources linked to PF and LD during the outbreaks. Considering reliable microbial monitoring is fundamental for epidemiological survey and risk assessment, the present information should be taken into account in assessing L. pneumophila indoors.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0905-6947</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1600-0668</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0668.2010.00701.x</identifier><identifier>PMID: 21198889</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Aerosols - analysis ; Air Microbiology ; Air Pollution, Indoor - analysis ; Azides - chemistry ; Bacteriological Techniques - methods ; Bioaerosol ; Cassettes ; Culture ; Environmental Monitoring - methods ; Epidemiological Monitoring ; Ethidium monoazide ; Filtration ; Filtration - methods ; Gelatin - chemistry ; Gelatins ; Humans ; Indoor ; Legionella pneumophila ; Legionella pneumophila - growth &amp; development ; Legionella pneumophila - isolation &amp; purification ; Legionnaires' Disease - diagnosis ; Legionnaires' Disease - epidemiology ; Legionnaires' Disease - etiology ; Microorganisms ; Polycarbonates ; Polymerase Chain Reaction - methods ; Quantitative PCR ; Risk Assessment - methods ; Samping ; Sampling</subject><ispartof>Indoor air, 2011-08, Vol.21 (4), p.291-299</ispartof><rights>2010 John Wiley &amp; Sons A/S</rights><rights>2010 John Wiley &amp; Sons A/S.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4991-f7d510f8a38d50d030965312e7069e935d91a219d4be06d3d5c254aed1a46e563</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fj.1600-0668.2010.00701.x$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fj.1600-0668.2010.00701.x$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>315,781,785,1418,27929,27930,45579,45580</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21198889$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Chang, C.-W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chou, F.-C.</creatorcontrib><title>Methodologies for quantifying culturable, viable, and total Legionella pneumophila in indoor air</title><title>Indoor air</title><addtitle>Indoor Air</addtitle><description>Legionella pneumophila, aerosolized from numerous indoor facilities (e.g., shower heads, hot tubs, spas), may cause Pontiac fever (PF) and lethal pneumonia named Legionnaires’ disease (LD) in humans. Reliable methods on quantitative exposure assessment of this bioaerosol are essential for the prevention of PF and LD. Coupled with culture, ethidium monoazide with qPCR, and qPCR assays, the collection efficiency for culturable, viable, and total L. pneumophila was assessed by means of filtration sampling (IOM with gelatin filter and cassette with polycarbonate filter) and liquid‐based sampling methods (BioSampler, AGI‐30, MAS‐100 sampler with Tween mixture and deionized water (DW)). Results show IOM/gelatin filter was comparable to cassette/polycarbonate filter (P = 0.33) and performed greater than all of tested liquid‐based methods for total cell collection. On the other hand, IOM/gelatin filter obtained greater efficiencies than cassette/polycarbonate filter by a factor of 3.8–8.6 for viable cells (P = 0.0006) and two orders of magnitude for culturable cells (P = 0.00002). Further comparison between liquid impingement and filtration methods indicates the sampling by IOM/gelatin filter, AGI‐30, and BioSampler with DW were the most appropriate for viable cells, while culturable cells were collected most efficiently by BioSampler/DW with periodical replenishment during the sampling. Practical Implications This study recommends the most suitable methodologies for quantifying culturable, viable, and total Legionella pneumophila in indoor air. By using appropriate sampling and analytical methods, the residents and building owners are able to obtain the reliable data and further characterize the exposure risk and/or intervention efficacy against L. pneumophila. Moreover, the adoption of suitable monitoring methods also assists the investigators to explore the sources linked to PF and LD during the outbreaks. Considering reliable microbial monitoring is fundamental for epidemiological survey and risk assessment, the present information should be taken into account in assessing L. pneumophila indoors.</description><subject>Aerosols - analysis</subject><subject>Air Microbiology</subject><subject>Air Pollution, Indoor - analysis</subject><subject>Azides - chemistry</subject><subject>Bacteriological Techniques - methods</subject><subject>Bioaerosol</subject><subject>Cassettes</subject><subject>Culture</subject><subject>Environmental Monitoring - methods</subject><subject>Epidemiological Monitoring</subject><subject>Ethidium monoazide</subject><subject>Filtration</subject><subject>Filtration - methods</subject><subject>Gelatin - chemistry</subject><subject>Gelatins</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Indoor</subject><subject>Legionella pneumophila</subject><subject>Legionella pneumophila - growth &amp; development</subject><subject>Legionella pneumophila - isolation &amp; purification</subject><subject>Legionnaires' Disease - diagnosis</subject><subject>Legionnaires' Disease - epidemiology</subject><subject>Legionnaires' Disease - etiology</subject><subject>Microorganisms</subject><subject>Polycarbonates</subject><subject>Polymerase Chain Reaction - methods</subject><subject>Quantitative PCR</subject><subject>Risk Assessment - methods</subject><subject>Samping</subject><subject>Sampling</subject><issn>0905-6947</issn><issn>1600-0668</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2011</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkU1vEzEQhi0EoqHwF9BKHODAhpn111riUkW0FKVF4kNIXAYn9qYOm3W6H5D8e7yk5MABLEsz8jzvjEcvYxnCFNN5tZ6iAshBqXJaQHoF0IDT3T02ORbuswkYkLkyQp-wR123BkDNDX_ITgpEU5almbBvV76_iS7WcRV8l1WxzW4H2_Sh2odmlS2Huh9au6j9y-xHOETbuKyPva2zuV-F2Pi6ttm28cMmbm9CykOTrouplQ3tY_agsnXnn9zFU_b5_M2n2dt8_v7icnY2z5fCGMwr7SRCVVpeOgkOOBglORZegzLecOkM2gKNEwsPynEnl4UU1ju0Qnmp-Cl7fui7bePt4LueNqFbjn9rfBw6SusiFlqW_ye11IXgiifyxT9J1FqjAIPj-Gd_oes4tE3amFAKYRB1YRL19I4aFhvvaNuGjW339MePBLw-AD9D7ffHOgKNvtOaRntptJdG3-m377Sjy-uzlCR5fpCHrve7o9y230lpriV9ub6gD--uYPb1vKSP_BdIj63a</recordid><startdate>201108</startdate><enddate>201108</enddate><creator>Chang, C.-W.</creator><creator>Chou, F.-C.</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><general>Hindawi Limited</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>7SU</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7TV</scope><scope>7U1</scope><scope>7U2</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201108</creationdate><title>Methodologies for quantifying culturable, viable, and total Legionella pneumophila in indoor air</title><author>Chang, C.-W. ; Chou, F.-C.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4991-f7d510f8a38d50d030965312e7069e935d91a219d4be06d3d5c254aed1a46e563</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2011</creationdate><topic>Aerosols - analysis</topic><topic>Air Microbiology</topic><topic>Air Pollution, Indoor - analysis</topic><topic>Azides - chemistry</topic><topic>Bacteriological Techniques - methods</topic><topic>Bioaerosol</topic><topic>Cassettes</topic><topic>Culture</topic><topic>Environmental Monitoring - methods</topic><topic>Epidemiological Monitoring</topic><topic>Ethidium monoazide</topic><topic>Filtration</topic><topic>Filtration - methods</topic><topic>Gelatin - chemistry</topic><topic>Gelatins</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Indoor</topic><topic>Legionella pneumophila</topic><topic>Legionella pneumophila - growth &amp; development</topic><topic>Legionella pneumophila - isolation &amp; purification</topic><topic>Legionnaires' Disease - diagnosis</topic><topic>Legionnaires' Disease - epidemiology</topic><topic>Legionnaires' Disease - etiology</topic><topic>Microorganisms</topic><topic>Polycarbonates</topic><topic>Polymerase Chain Reaction - methods</topic><topic>Quantitative PCR</topic><topic>Risk Assessment - methods</topic><topic>Samping</topic><topic>Sampling</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Chang, C.-W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chou, F.-C.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Pollution Abstracts</collection><collection>Risk Abstracts</collection><collection>Safety Science and Risk</collection><jtitle>Indoor air</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Chang, C.-W.</au><au>Chou, F.-C.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Methodologies for quantifying culturable, viable, and total Legionella pneumophila in indoor air</atitle><jtitle>Indoor air</jtitle><addtitle>Indoor Air</addtitle><date>2011-08</date><risdate>2011</risdate><volume>21</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>291</spage><epage>299</epage><pages>291-299</pages><issn>0905-6947</issn><eissn>1600-0668</eissn><abstract>Legionella pneumophila, aerosolized from numerous indoor facilities (e.g., shower heads, hot tubs, spas), may cause Pontiac fever (PF) and lethal pneumonia named Legionnaires’ disease (LD) in humans. Reliable methods on quantitative exposure assessment of this bioaerosol are essential for the prevention of PF and LD. Coupled with culture, ethidium monoazide with qPCR, and qPCR assays, the collection efficiency for culturable, viable, and total L. pneumophila was assessed by means of filtration sampling (IOM with gelatin filter and cassette with polycarbonate filter) and liquid‐based sampling methods (BioSampler, AGI‐30, MAS‐100 sampler with Tween mixture and deionized water (DW)). Results show IOM/gelatin filter was comparable to cassette/polycarbonate filter (P = 0.33) and performed greater than all of tested liquid‐based methods for total cell collection. On the other hand, IOM/gelatin filter obtained greater efficiencies than cassette/polycarbonate filter by a factor of 3.8–8.6 for viable cells (P = 0.0006) and two orders of magnitude for culturable cells (P = 0.00002). Further comparison between liquid impingement and filtration methods indicates the sampling by IOM/gelatin filter, AGI‐30, and BioSampler with DW were the most appropriate for viable cells, while culturable cells were collected most efficiently by BioSampler/DW with periodical replenishment during the sampling. Practical Implications This study recommends the most suitable methodologies for quantifying culturable, viable, and total Legionella pneumophila in indoor air. By using appropriate sampling and analytical methods, the residents and building owners are able to obtain the reliable data and further characterize the exposure risk and/or intervention efficacy against L. pneumophila. Moreover, the adoption of suitable monitoring methods also assists the investigators to explore the sources linked to PF and LD during the outbreaks. Considering reliable microbial monitoring is fundamental for epidemiological survey and risk assessment, the present information should be taken into account in assessing L. pneumophila indoors.</abstract><cop>Oxford, UK</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><pmid>21198889</pmid><doi>10.1111/j.1600-0668.2010.00701.x</doi><tpages>9</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0905-6947
ispartof Indoor air, 2011-08, Vol.21 (4), p.291-299
issn 0905-6947
1600-0668
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_888112758
source MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library All Journals
subjects Aerosols - analysis
Air Microbiology
Air Pollution, Indoor - analysis
Azides - chemistry
Bacteriological Techniques - methods
Bioaerosol
Cassettes
Culture
Environmental Monitoring - methods
Epidemiological Monitoring
Ethidium monoazide
Filtration
Filtration - methods
Gelatin - chemistry
Gelatins
Humans
Indoor
Legionella pneumophila
Legionella pneumophila - growth & development
Legionella pneumophila - isolation & purification
Legionnaires' Disease - diagnosis
Legionnaires' Disease - epidemiology
Legionnaires' Disease - etiology
Microorganisms
Polycarbonates
Polymerase Chain Reaction - methods
Quantitative PCR
Risk Assessment - methods
Samping
Sampling
title Methodologies for quantifying culturable, viable, and total Legionella pneumophila in indoor air
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-15T13%3A26%3A19IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Methodologies%20for%20quantifying%20culturable,%20viable,%20and%20total%20Legionella%20pneumophila%20in%20indoor%20air&rft.jtitle=Indoor%20air&rft.au=Chang,%20C.-W.&rft.date=2011-08&rft.volume=21&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=291&rft.epage=299&rft.pages=291-299&rft.issn=0905-6947&rft.eissn=1600-0668&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/j.1600-0668.2010.00701.x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E3372079481%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1544911729&rft_id=info:pmid/21198889&rfr_iscdi=true