Methodologies for quantifying culturable, viable, and total Legionella pneumophila in indoor air
Legionella pneumophila, aerosolized from numerous indoor facilities (e.g., shower heads, hot tubs, spas), may cause Pontiac fever (PF) and lethal pneumonia named Legionnaires’ disease (LD) in humans. Reliable methods on quantitative exposure assessment of this bioaerosol are essential for the preven...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Indoor air 2011-08, Vol.21 (4), p.291-299 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 299 |
---|---|
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 291 |
container_title | Indoor air |
container_volume | 21 |
creator | Chang, C.-W. Chou, F.-C. |
description | Legionella pneumophila, aerosolized from numerous indoor facilities (e.g., shower heads, hot tubs, spas), may cause Pontiac fever (PF) and lethal pneumonia named Legionnaires’ disease (LD) in humans. Reliable methods on quantitative exposure assessment of this bioaerosol are essential for the prevention of PF and LD. Coupled with culture, ethidium monoazide with qPCR, and qPCR assays, the collection efficiency for culturable, viable, and total L. pneumophila was assessed by means of filtration sampling (IOM with gelatin filter and cassette with polycarbonate filter) and liquid‐based sampling methods (BioSampler, AGI‐30, MAS‐100 sampler with Tween mixture and deionized water (DW)). Results show IOM/gelatin filter was comparable to cassette/polycarbonate filter (P = 0.33) and performed greater than all of tested liquid‐based methods for total cell collection. On the other hand, IOM/gelatin filter obtained greater efficiencies than cassette/polycarbonate filter by a factor of 3.8–8.6 for viable cells (P = 0.0006) and two orders of magnitude for culturable cells (P = 0.00002). Further comparison between liquid impingement and filtration methods indicates the sampling by IOM/gelatin filter, AGI‐30, and BioSampler with DW were the most appropriate for viable cells, while culturable cells were collected most efficiently by BioSampler/DW with periodical replenishment during the sampling.
Practical Implications
This study recommends the most suitable methodologies for quantifying culturable, viable, and total Legionella pneumophila in indoor air. By using appropriate sampling and analytical methods, the residents and building owners are able to obtain the reliable data and further characterize the exposure risk and/or intervention efficacy against L. pneumophila. Moreover, the adoption of suitable monitoring methods also assists the investigators to explore the sources linked to PF and LD during the outbreaks. Considering reliable microbial monitoring is fundamental for epidemiological survey and risk assessment, the present information should be taken into account in assessing L. pneumophila indoors. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1111/j.1600-0668.2010.00701.x |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_888112758</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3372079481</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4991-f7d510f8a38d50d030965312e7069e935d91a219d4be06d3d5c254aed1a46e563</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkU1vEzEQhi0EoqHwF9BKHODAhpn111riUkW0FKVF4kNIXAYn9qYOm3W6H5D8e7yk5MABLEsz8jzvjEcvYxnCFNN5tZ6iAshBqXJaQHoF0IDT3T02ORbuswkYkLkyQp-wR123BkDNDX_ITgpEU5almbBvV76_iS7WcRV8l1WxzW4H2_Sh2odmlS2Huh9au6j9y-xHOETbuKyPva2zuV-F2Pi6ttm28cMmbm9CykOTrouplQ3tY_agsnXnn9zFU_b5_M2n2dt8_v7icnY2z5fCGMwr7SRCVVpeOgkOOBglORZegzLecOkM2gKNEwsPynEnl4UU1ju0Qnmp-Cl7fui7bePt4LueNqFbjn9rfBw6SusiFlqW_ye11IXgiifyxT9J1FqjAIPj-Gd_oes4tE3amFAKYRB1YRL19I4aFhvvaNuGjW339MePBLw-AD9D7ffHOgKNvtOaRntptJdG3-m377Sjy-uzlCR5fpCHrve7o9y230lpriV9ub6gD--uYPb1vKSP_BdIj63a</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1544911729</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Methodologies for quantifying culturable, viable, and total Legionella pneumophila in indoor air</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library All Journals</source><creator>Chang, C.-W. ; Chou, F.-C.</creator><creatorcontrib>Chang, C.-W. ; Chou, F.-C.</creatorcontrib><description>Legionella pneumophila, aerosolized from numerous indoor facilities (e.g., shower heads, hot tubs, spas), may cause Pontiac fever (PF) and lethal pneumonia named Legionnaires’ disease (LD) in humans. Reliable methods on quantitative exposure assessment of this bioaerosol are essential for the prevention of PF and LD. Coupled with culture, ethidium monoazide with qPCR, and qPCR assays, the collection efficiency for culturable, viable, and total L. pneumophila was assessed by means of filtration sampling (IOM with gelatin filter and cassette with polycarbonate filter) and liquid‐based sampling methods (BioSampler, AGI‐30, MAS‐100 sampler with Tween mixture and deionized water (DW)). Results show IOM/gelatin filter was comparable to cassette/polycarbonate filter (P = 0.33) and performed greater than all of tested liquid‐based methods for total cell collection. On the other hand, IOM/gelatin filter obtained greater efficiencies than cassette/polycarbonate filter by a factor of 3.8–8.6 for viable cells (P = 0.0006) and two orders of magnitude for culturable cells (P = 0.00002). Further comparison between liquid impingement and filtration methods indicates the sampling by IOM/gelatin filter, AGI‐30, and BioSampler with DW were the most appropriate for viable cells, while culturable cells were collected most efficiently by BioSampler/DW with periodical replenishment during the sampling.
Practical Implications
This study recommends the most suitable methodologies for quantifying culturable, viable, and total Legionella pneumophila in indoor air. By using appropriate sampling and analytical methods, the residents and building owners are able to obtain the reliable data and further characterize the exposure risk and/or intervention efficacy against L. pneumophila. Moreover, the adoption of suitable monitoring methods also assists the investigators to explore the sources linked to PF and LD during the outbreaks. Considering reliable microbial monitoring is fundamental for epidemiological survey and risk assessment, the present information should be taken into account in assessing L. pneumophila indoors.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0905-6947</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1600-0668</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0668.2010.00701.x</identifier><identifier>PMID: 21198889</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Aerosols - analysis ; Air Microbiology ; Air Pollution, Indoor - analysis ; Azides - chemistry ; Bacteriological Techniques - methods ; Bioaerosol ; Cassettes ; Culture ; Environmental Monitoring - methods ; Epidemiological Monitoring ; Ethidium monoazide ; Filtration ; Filtration - methods ; Gelatin - chemistry ; Gelatins ; Humans ; Indoor ; Legionella pneumophila ; Legionella pneumophila - growth & development ; Legionella pneumophila - isolation & purification ; Legionnaires' Disease - diagnosis ; Legionnaires' Disease - epidemiology ; Legionnaires' Disease - etiology ; Microorganisms ; Polycarbonates ; Polymerase Chain Reaction - methods ; Quantitative PCR ; Risk Assessment - methods ; Samping ; Sampling</subject><ispartof>Indoor air, 2011-08, Vol.21 (4), p.291-299</ispartof><rights>2010 John Wiley & Sons A/S</rights><rights>2010 John Wiley & Sons A/S.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4991-f7d510f8a38d50d030965312e7069e935d91a219d4be06d3d5c254aed1a46e563</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fj.1600-0668.2010.00701.x$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fj.1600-0668.2010.00701.x$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>315,781,785,1418,27929,27930,45579,45580</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21198889$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Chang, C.-W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chou, F.-C.</creatorcontrib><title>Methodologies for quantifying culturable, viable, and total Legionella pneumophila in indoor air</title><title>Indoor air</title><addtitle>Indoor Air</addtitle><description>Legionella pneumophila, aerosolized from numerous indoor facilities (e.g., shower heads, hot tubs, spas), may cause Pontiac fever (PF) and lethal pneumonia named Legionnaires’ disease (LD) in humans. Reliable methods on quantitative exposure assessment of this bioaerosol are essential for the prevention of PF and LD. Coupled with culture, ethidium monoazide with qPCR, and qPCR assays, the collection efficiency for culturable, viable, and total L. pneumophila was assessed by means of filtration sampling (IOM with gelatin filter and cassette with polycarbonate filter) and liquid‐based sampling methods (BioSampler, AGI‐30, MAS‐100 sampler with Tween mixture and deionized water (DW)). Results show IOM/gelatin filter was comparable to cassette/polycarbonate filter (P = 0.33) and performed greater than all of tested liquid‐based methods for total cell collection. On the other hand, IOM/gelatin filter obtained greater efficiencies than cassette/polycarbonate filter by a factor of 3.8–8.6 for viable cells (P = 0.0006) and two orders of magnitude for culturable cells (P = 0.00002). Further comparison between liquid impingement and filtration methods indicates the sampling by IOM/gelatin filter, AGI‐30, and BioSampler with DW were the most appropriate for viable cells, while culturable cells were collected most efficiently by BioSampler/DW with periodical replenishment during the sampling.
Practical Implications
This study recommends the most suitable methodologies for quantifying culturable, viable, and total Legionella pneumophila in indoor air. By using appropriate sampling and analytical methods, the residents and building owners are able to obtain the reliable data and further characterize the exposure risk and/or intervention efficacy against L. pneumophila. Moreover, the adoption of suitable monitoring methods also assists the investigators to explore the sources linked to PF and LD during the outbreaks. Considering reliable microbial monitoring is fundamental for epidemiological survey and risk assessment, the present information should be taken into account in assessing L. pneumophila indoors.</description><subject>Aerosols - analysis</subject><subject>Air Microbiology</subject><subject>Air Pollution, Indoor - analysis</subject><subject>Azides - chemistry</subject><subject>Bacteriological Techniques - methods</subject><subject>Bioaerosol</subject><subject>Cassettes</subject><subject>Culture</subject><subject>Environmental Monitoring - methods</subject><subject>Epidemiological Monitoring</subject><subject>Ethidium monoazide</subject><subject>Filtration</subject><subject>Filtration - methods</subject><subject>Gelatin - chemistry</subject><subject>Gelatins</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Indoor</subject><subject>Legionella pneumophila</subject><subject>Legionella pneumophila - growth & development</subject><subject>Legionella pneumophila - isolation & purification</subject><subject>Legionnaires' Disease - diagnosis</subject><subject>Legionnaires' Disease - epidemiology</subject><subject>Legionnaires' Disease - etiology</subject><subject>Microorganisms</subject><subject>Polycarbonates</subject><subject>Polymerase Chain Reaction - methods</subject><subject>Quantitative PCR</subject><subject>Risk Assessment - methods</subject><subject>Samping</subject><subject>Sampling</subject><issn>0905-6947</issn><issn>1600-0668</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2011</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkU1vEzEQhi0EoqHwF9BKHODAhpn111riUkW0FKVF4kNIXAYn9qYOm3W6H5D8e7yk5MABLEsz8jzvjEcvYxnCFNN5tZ6iAshBqXJaQHoF0IDT3T02ORbuswkYkLkyQp-wR123BkDNDX_ITgpEU5almbBvV76_iS7WcRV8l1WxzW4H2_Sh2odmlS2Huh9au6j9y-xHOETbuKyPva2zuV-F2Pi6ttm28cMmbm9CykOTrouplQ3tY_agsnXnn9zFU_b5_M2n2dt8_v7icnY2z5fCGMwr7SRCVVpeOgkOOBglORZegzLecOkM2gKNEwsPynEnl4UU1ju0Qnmp-Cl7fui7bePt4LueNqFbjn9rfBw6SusiFlqW_ye11IXgiifyxT9J1FqjAIPj-Gd_oes4tE3amFAKYRB1YRL19I4aFhvvaNuGjW339MePBLw-AD9D7ffHOgKNvtOaRntptJdG3-m377Sjy-uzlCR5fpCHrve7o9y230lpriV9ub6gD--uYPb1vKSP_BdIj63a</recordid><startdate>201108</startdate><enddate>201108</enddate><creator>Chang, C.-W.</creator><creator>Chou, F.-C.</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><general>Hindawi Limited</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>7SU</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7TV</scope><scope>7U1</scope><scope>7U2</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201108</creationdate><title>Methodologies for quantifying culturable, viable, and total Legionella pneumophila in indoor air</title><author>Chang, C.-W. ; Chou, F.-C.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4991-f7d510f8a38d50d030965312e7069e935d91a219d4be06d3d5c254aed1a46e563</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2011</creationdate><topic>Aerosols - analysis</topic><topic>Air Microbiology</topic><topic>Air Pollution, Indoor - analysis</topic><topic>Azides - chemistry</topic><topic>Bacteriological Techniques - methods</topic><topic>Bioaerosol</topic><topic>Cassettes</topic><topic>Culture</topic><topic>Environmental Monitoring - methods</topic><topic>Epidemiological Monitoring</topic><topic>Ethidium monoazide</topic><topic>Filtration</topic><topic>Filtration - methods</topic><topic>Gelatin - chemistry</topic><topic>Gelatins</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Indoor</topic><topic>Legionella pneumophila</topic><topic>Legionella pneumophila - growth & development</topic><topic>Legionella pneumophila - isolation & purification</topic><topic>Legionnaires' Disease - diagnosis</topic><topic>Legionnaires' Disease - epidemiology</topic><topic>Legionnaires' Disease - etiology</topic><topic>Microorganisms</topic><topic>Polycarbonates</topic><topic>Polymerase Chain Reaction - methods</topic><topic>Quantitative PCR</topic><topic>Risk Assessment - methods</topic><topic>Samping</topic><topic>Sampling</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Chang, C.-W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chou, F.-C.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Pollution Abstracts</collection><collection>Risk Abstracts</collection><collection>Safety Science and Risk</collection><jtitle>Indoor air</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Chang, C.-W.</au><au>Chou, F.-C.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Methodologies for quantifying culturable, viable, and total Legionella pneumophila in indoor air</atitle><jtitle>Indoor air</jtitle><addtitle>Indoor Air</addtitle><date>2011-08</date><risdate>2011</risdate><volume>21</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>291</spage><epage>299</epage><pages>291-299</pages><issn>0905-6947</issn><eissn>1600-0668</eissn><abstract>Legionella pneumophila, aerosolized from numerous indoor facilities (e.g., shower heads, hot tubs, spas), may cause Pontiac fever (PF) and lethal pneumonia named Legionnaires’ disease (LD) in humans. Reliable methods on quantitative exposure assessment of this bioaerosol are essential for the prevention of PF and LD. Coupled with culture, ethidium monoazide with qPCR, and qPCR assays, the collection efficiency for culturable, viable, and total L. pneumophila was assessed by means of filtration sampling (IOM with gelatin filter and cassette with polycarbonate filter) and liquid‐based sampling methods (BioSampler, AGI‐30, MAS‐100 sampler with Tween mixture and deionized water (DW)). Results show IOM/gelatin filter was comparable to cassette/polycarbonate filter (P = 0.33) and performed greater than all of tested liquid‐based methods for total cell collection. On the other hand, IOM/gelatin filter obtained greater efficiencies than cassette/polycarbonate filter by a factor of 3.8–8.6 for viable cells (P = 0.0006) and two orders of magnitude for culturable cells (P = 0.00002). Further comparison between liquid impingement and filtration methods indicates the sampling by IOM/gelatin filter, AGI‐30, and BioSampler with DW were the most appropriate for viable cells, while culturable cells were collected most efficiently by BioSampler/DW with periodical replenishment during the sampling.
Practical Implications
This study recommends the most suitable methodologies for quantifying culturable, viable, and total Legionella pneumophila in indoor air. By using appropriate sampling and analytical methods, the residents and building owners are able to obtain the reliable data and further characterize the exposure risk and/or intervention efficacy against L. pneumophila. Moreover, the adoption of suitable monitoring methods also assists the investigators to explore the sources linked to PF and LD during the outbreaks. Considering reliable microbial monitoring is fundamental for epidemiological survey and risk assessment, the present information should be taken into account in assessing L. pneumophila indoors.</abstract><cop>Oxford, UK</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><pmid>21198889</pmid><doi>10.1111/j.1600-0668.2010.00701.x</doi><tpages>9</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0905-6947 |
ispartof | Indoor air, 2011-08, Vol.21 (4), p.291-299 |
issn | 0905-6947 1600-0668 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_888112758 |
source | MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library All Journals |
subjects | Aerosols - analysis Air Microbiology Air Pollution, Indoor - analysis Azides - chemistry Bacteriological Techniques - methods Bioaerosol Cassettes Culture Environmental Monitoring - methods Epidemiological Monitoring Ethidium monoazide Filtration Filtration - methods Gelatin - chemistry Gelatins Humans Indoor Legionella pneumophila Legionella pneumophila - growth & development Legionella pneumophila - isolation & purification Legionnaires' Disease - diagnosis Legionnaires' Disease - epidemiology Legionnaires' Disease - etiology Microorganisms Polycarbonates Polymerase Chain Reaction - methods Quantitative PCR Risk Assessment - methods Samping Sampling |
title | Methodologies for quantifying culturable, viable, and total Legionella pneumophila in indoor air |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-15T13%3A26%3A19IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Methodologies%20for%20quantifying%20culturable,%20viable,%20and%20total%20Legionella%20pneumophila%20in%20indoor%20air&rft.jtitle=Indoor%20air&rft.au=Chang,%20C.-W.&rft.date=2011-08&rft.volume=21&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=291&rft.epage=299&rft.pages=291-299&rft.issn=0905-6947&rft.eissn=1600-0668&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/j.1600-0668.2010.00701.x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E3372079481%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1544911729&rft_id=info:pmid/21198889&rfr_iscdi=true |