Influence of landscape structure on endemic cicadas in New Zealand kiwifruit orchards

1 The endemic cicada species Amphipsalta cingulata (Fabricius) and Amphipsalta zelandica (Boisduval) are pests of New Zealand kiwifruit. 2 We determined the abundance of A. cingulata and A. zelandica by counting final‐instar exuviae in a block of ‘Hayward’ kiwifruit, the dominant cultivar, on each o...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Agricultural and forest entomology 2011-08, Vol.13 (3), p.259-271
Hauptverfasser: Logan, David P., Hill, M. Garry, Connolly, Patrick G., Maher, Bridget J., Dobson, Shirley J.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 271
container_issue 3
container_start_page 259
container_title Agricultural and forest entomology
container_volume 13
creator Logan, David P.
Hill, M. Garry
Connolly, Patrick G.
Maher, Bridget J.
Dobson, Shirley J.
description 1 The endemic cicada species Amphipsalta cingulata (Fabricius) and Amphipsalta zelandica (Boisduval) are pests of New Zealand kiwifruit. 2 We determined the abundance of A. cingulata and A. zelandica by counting final‐instar exuviae in a block of ‘Hayward’ kiwifruit, the dominant cultivar, on each of 70 blocks on separate orchards in the Bay of Plenty, New Zealand. 3 We used a geographic information system and fragstats to generate predictive variables describing landscape structure in four nested landscapes ranging in size between 6.25 and 400 ha for each site. Other variables described the physical characteristics of the site and management practices. Data were analyzed by boosted regression trees, a method that combines the advantages of regression trees and machine learning. 4 The most influential variables differed for each species. Modified coastal landscapes with high densities of ‘Hayward’ kiwifruit were most favourable for A. cingulata. For A. zelandica, favourable landscapes contained significant areas of native forest. The 12 most influential variables accounted for 51% and 46% of the total influence of all variables measured for A. cingulata and A. zelandica, respectively. 5 Landscape structure was more influential than insecticide use and local site factors. Despite the apparent low vagility of cicadas, landscape structure at relatively large scales of ≥25 ha was influential for both A. cingulata and A. zelandica. The ability to use a wide range of hosts within the production landscape may account for this pattern. Key variables need to be confirmed by identifying the same patterns in other landscapes.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/j.1461-9563.2010.00517.x
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_888112024</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2399073441</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4097-6c0daab44664e6d8641327416e1cccbf8d8da8b0e5aef85e7e6fdfbd6dae89143</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkE1LAzEQhhdRsFb_Q_DiaWuyH0kKXopaFYpeFKGXIU0mmLrdrckubf-9WSs9eDKXDJP3mQxPkhBGRyye6-WIFZyl45Lno4zGLqUlE6PtUTI4PBwf6rI8Tc5CWFLKMiHkIHl7qm3VYa2RNJZUqjZBqzWS0PpOt52P7ZpgbXDlNNFOK6MCcTV5xg2Zo-oB8uk2zvrOtaTx-kN5E86TE6uqgBe_9zB5m96_3j6ms5eHp9vJLNUFHYuUa2qUWhQF5wVyI3nB8kwUjCPTWi-sNNIouaBYKrSyRIHcGrsw3CiUY1bkw-RqP3ftm68OQwsrFzRWcS1sugBSSsYymvXJyz_JZdP5Oi4HUvD4ZzZmMST3Ie2bEDxaWHu3Un4HjEJvG5bQi4ReKvS24cc2bCN6s0c3rsLdvzmYTO9jEfF0j7vQ4vaAK_8JXOSihPfnB5jP7ubTaS6gzL8Bk4qVcQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>876741291</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Influence of landscape structure on endemic cicadas in New Zealand kiwifruit orchards</title><source>Wiley Online Library All Journals</source><creator>Logan, David P. ; Hill, M. Garry ; Connolly, Patrick G. ; Maher, Bridget J. ; Dobson, Shirley J.</creator><creatorcontrib>Logan, David P. ; Hill, M. Garry ; Connolly, Patrick G. ; Maher, Bridget J. ; Dobson, Shirley J.</creatorcontrib><description>1 The endemic cicada species Amphipsalta cingulata (Fabricius) and Amphipsalta zelandica (Boisduval) are pests of New Zealand kiwifruit. 2 We determined the abundance of A. cingulata and A. zelandica by counting final‐instar exuviae in a block of ‘Hayward’ kiwifruit, the dominant cultivar, on each of 70 blocks on separate orchards in the Bay of Plenty, New Zealand. 3 We used a geographic information system and fragstats to generate predictive variables describing landscape structure in four nested landscapes ranging in size between 6.25 and 400 ha for each site. Other variables described the physical characteristics of the site and management practices. Data were analyzed by boosted regression trees, a method that combines the advantages of regression trees and machine learning. 4 The most influential variables differed for each species. Modified coastal landscapes with high densities of ‘Hayward’ kiwifruit were most favourable for A. cingulata. For A. zelandica, favourable landscapes contained significant areas of native forest. The 12 most influential variables accounted for 51% and 46% of the total influence of all variables measured for A. cingulata and A. zelandica, respectively. 5 Landscape structure was more influential than insecticide use and local site factors. Despite the apparent low vagility of cicadas, landscape structure at relatively large scales of ≥25 ha was influential for both A. cingulata and A. zelandica. The ability to use a wide range of hosts within the production landscape may account for this pattern. Key variables need to be confirmed by identifying the same patterns in other landscapes.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1461-9555</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1461-9563</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/j.1461-9563.2010.00517.x</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Amphipsalta cingulata ; Amphipsalta zelandica ; boosted regression trees ; focal patch study ; fragstats ; Fruits ; Insect control ; Insects ; Landscape ecology ; Trees</subject><ispartof>Agricultural and forest entomology, 2011-08, Vol.13 (3), p.259-271</ispartof><rights>2010 The Authors. Agricultural and Forest Entomology © 2010 The Royal Entomological Society</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4097-6c0daab44664e6d8641327416e1cccbf8d8da8b0e5aef85e7e6fdfbd6dae89143</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4097-6c0daab44664e6d8641327416e1cccbf8d8da8b0e5aef85e7e6fdfbd6dae89143</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fj.1461-9563.2010.00517.x$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fj.1461-9563.2010.00517.x$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1417,27923,27924,45573,45574</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Logan, David P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hill, M. Garry</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Connolly, Patrick G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Maher, Bridget J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dobson, Shirley J.</creatorcontrib><title>Influence of landscape structure on endemic cicadas in New Zealand kiwifruit orchards</title><title>Agricultural and forest entomology</title><description>1 The endemic cicada species Amphipsalta cingulata (Fabricius) and Amphipsalta zelandica (Boisduval) are pests of New Zealand kiwifruit. 2 We determined the abundance of A. cingulata and A. zelandica by counting final‐instar exuviae in a block of ‘Hayward’ kiwifruit, the dominant cultivar, on each of 70 blocks on separate orchards in the Bay of Plenty, New Zealand. 3 We used a geographic information system and fragstats to generate predictive variables describing landscape structure in four nested landscapes ranging in size between 6.25 and 400 ha for each site. Other variables described the physical characteristics of the site and management practices. Data were analyzed by boosted regression trees, a method that combines the advantages of regression trees and machine learning. 4 The most influential variables differed for each species. Modified coastal landscapes with high densities of ‘Hayward’ kiwifruit were most favourable for A. cingulata. For A. zelandica, favourable landscapes contained significant areas of native forest. The 12 most influential variables accounted for 51% and 46% of the total influence of all variables measured for A. cingulata and A. zelandica, respectively. 5 Landscape structure was more influential than insecticide use and local site factors. Despite the apparent low vagility of cicadas, landscape structure at relatively large scales of ≥25 ha was influential for both A. cingulata and A. zelandica. The ability to use a wide range of hosts within the production landscape may account for this pattern. Key variables need to be confirmed by identifying the same patterns in other landscapes.</description><subject>Amphipsalta cingulata</subject><subject>Amphipsalta zelandica</subject><subject>boosted regression trees</subject><subject>focal patch study</subject><subject>fragstats</subject><subject>Fruits</subject><subject>Insect control</subject><subject>Insects</subject><subject>Landscape ecology</subject><subject>Trees</subject><issn>1461-9555</issn><issn>1461-9563</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2011</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqNkE1LAzEQhhdRsFb_Q_DiaWuyH0kKXopaFYpeFKGXIU0mmLrdrckubf-9WSs9eDKXDJP3mQxPkhBGRyye6-WIFZyl45Lno4zGLqUlE6PtUTI4PBwf6rI8Tc5CWFLKMiHkIHl7qm3VYa2RNJZUqjZBqzWS0PpOt52P7ZpgbXDlNNFOK6MCcTV5xg2Zo-oB8uk2zvrOtaTx-kN5E86TE6uqgBe_9zB5m96_3j6ms5eHp9vJLNUFHYuUa2qUWhQF5wVyI3nB8kwUjCPTWi-sNNIouaBYKrSyRIHcGrsw3CiUY1bkw-RqP3ftm68OQwsrFzRWcS1sugBSSsYymvXJyz_JZdP5Oi4HUvD4ZzZmMST3Ie2bEDxaWHu3Un4HjEJvG5bQi4ReKvS24cc2bCN6s0c3rsLdvzmYTO9jEfF0j7vQ4vaAK_8JXOSihPfnB5jP7ubTaS6gzL8Bk4qVcQ</recordid><startdate>201108</startdate><enddate>201108</enddate><creator>Logan, David P.</creator><creator>Hill, M. Garry</creator><creator>Connolly, Patrick G.</creator><creator>Maher, Bridget J.</creator><creator>Dobson, Shirley J.</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>P64</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201108</creationdate><title>Influence of landscape structure on endemic cicadas in New Zealand kiwifruit orchards</title><author>Logan, David P. ; Hill, M. Garry ; Connolly, Patrick G. ; Maher, Bridget J. ; Dobson, Shirley J.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4097-6c0daab44664e6d8641327416e1cccbf8d8da8b0e5aef85e7e6fdfbd6dae89143</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2011</creationdate><topic>Amphipsalta cingulata</topic><topic>Amphipsalta zelandica</topic><topic>boosted regression trees</topic><topic>focal patch study</topic><topic>fragstats</topic><topic>Fruits</topic><topic>Insect control</topic><topic>Insects</topic><topic>Landscape ecology</topic><topic>Trees</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Logan, David P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hill, M. Garry</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Connolly, Patrick G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Maher, Bridget J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dobson, Shirley J.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Agricultural and forest entomology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Logan, David P.</au><au>Hill, M. Garry</au><au>Connolly, Patrick G.</au><au>Maher, Bridget J.</au><au>Dobson, Shirley J.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Influence of landscape structure on endemic cicadas in New Zealand kiwifruit orchards</atitle><jtitle>Agricultural and forest entomology</jtitle><date>2011-08</date><risdate>2011</risdate><volume>13</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>259</spage><epage>271</epage><pages>259-271</pages><issn>1461-9555</issn><eissn>1461-9563</eissn><abstract>1 The endemic cicada species Amphipsalta cingulata (Fabricius) and Amphipsalta zelandica (Boisduval) are pests of New Zealand kiwifruit. 2 We determined the abundance of A. cingulata and A. zelandica by counting final‐instar exuviae in a block of ‘Hayward’ kiwifruit, the dominant cultivar, on each of 70 blocks on separate orchards in the Bay of Plenty, New Zealand. 3 We used a geographic information system and fragstats to generate predictive variables describing landscape structure in four nested landscapes ranging in size between 6.25 and 400 ha for each site. Other variables described the physical characteristics of the site and management practices. Data were analyzed by boosted regression trees, a method that combines the advantages of regression trees and machine learning. 4 The most influential variables differed for each species. Modified coastal landscapes with high densities of ‘Hayward’ kiwifruit were most favourable for A. cingulata. For A. zelandica, favourable landscapes contained significant areas of native forest. The 12 most influential variables accounted for 51% and 46% of the total influence of all variables measured for A. cingulata and A. zelandica, respectively. 5 Landscape structure was more influential than insecticide use and local site factors. Despite the apparent low vagility of cicadas, landscape structure at relatively large scales of ≥25 ha was influential for both A. cingulata and A. zelandica. The ability to use a wide range of hosts within the production landscape may account for this pattern. Key variables need to be confirmed by identifying the same patterns in other landscapes.</abstract><cop>Oxford, UK</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><doi>10.1111/j.1461-9563.2010.00517.x</doi><tpages>13</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1461-9555
ispartof Agricultural and forest entomology, 2011-08, Vol.13 (3), p.259-271
issn 1461-9555
1461-9563
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_888112024
source Wiley Online Library All Journals
subjects Amphipsalta cingulata
Amphipsalta zelandica
boosted regression trees
focal patch study
fragstats
Fruits
Insect control
Insects
Landscape ecology
Trees
title Influence of landscape structure on endemic cicadas in New Zealand kiwifruit orchards
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-08T06%3A38%3A50IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Influence%20of%20landscape%20structure%20on%20endemic%20cicadas%20in%20New%20Zealand%20kiwifruit%20orchards&rft.jtitle=Agricultural%20and%20forest%20entomology&rft.au=Logan,%20David%20P.&rft.date=2011-08&rft.volume=13&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=259&rft.epage=271&rft.pages=259-271&rft.issn=1461-9555&rft.eissn=1461-9563&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/j.1461-9563.2010.00517.x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2399073441%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=876741291&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true