Acceptance by Honey Bee Guards of Non-Nestmates is not Increased by Treatment with Nestmate Odours

Honey bee, Apis mellifera, entrance guards use chemical cues to discriminate nestmates from non-nestmates. Previous research has shown that when wax combs are reciprocally swapped between two colonies, guards become more accepting of workers from the swap partner. However, when combs were transferre...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Ethology 2011-08, Vol.117 (8), p.655-663
Hauptverfasser: Ratnieks, Francis L.W, Kärcher, Martin H, Firth, Verity, Parks, Danielle, Richards, Amanda, Richards, Paul, Helanterä, Heikki
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 663
container_issue 8
container_start_page 655
container_title Ethology
container_volume 117
creator Ratnieks, Francis L.W
Kärcher, Martin H
Firth, Verity
Parks, Danielle
Richards, Amanda
Richards, Paul
Helanterä, Heikki
description Honey bee, Apis mellifera, entrance guards use chemical cues to discriminate nestmates from non-nestmates. Previous research has shown that when wax combs are reciprocally swapped between two colonies, guards become more accepting of workers from the swap partner. However, when combs were transferred only one way, guards in the comb-receiver colony became more accepting of bees from the comb-donor colony, but not vice versa. Hence, the increased acceptance of non-nestmates caused by reciprocal comb swapping was not because of introduced bees acquiring odours from the transferred combs, which was surprising because comb wax was known to affect the odour of bees. In the current experiment, we caused workers to acquire either nestmate or non-nestmate odours by holding them for 15 min in a tube, which had previously held nestmates or non-nestmates and then measured their acceptance by entrance guards of nestmate or non-nestmate hives. When transferred workers had acquired odours of non-nestmates, acceptance by their own colony's guards significantly decreased to 66% from 91%. Conversely, the acceptance of non-nestmates that had acquired odours of the guards' own nestmates was unchanged, 25% vs. 25%. These results show that when equivalent changes in the odour of introduced bees are made, guards are more sensitive to changes that cause nestmates to acquire non-nestmate odours than vice versa. These results are also a likely explanation for the earlier and surprising results from the unidirectional comb swap experiment (Couvillon et al. 2007). We make a hypothesis for the underlying mechanism in terms of a multidimensional recognition cue space.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/j.1439-0310.2011.01918.x
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_wiley</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_888101544</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>888101544</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4358-5c3e9a5e5d162f31b6119f32a46708d0fff22711e845b3a2504bea918826ae423</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkMtOwzAQRS0EEuXxDVhsWKV4bCdxFix4thWoLChCYjNykgmktEmJU9H-PQ6FLvBmxuNzR9eXMQ6iD_6cT_ugVRII5QdSAPQFJGD6qx3W2z7ssp6AOAkgArXPDpybCn9Xseqx9DLLaNHaKiOervmwrmjNr4j4YGmb3PG64OO6Csbk2rltyfHS8apu-ajKGrKO8k418W07p6rlX2X7zv9g_pjXy8Ydsb3Czhwd_9ZD9nx3O7keBg-Pg9H15UOQaRWaIMwUJTakMIdIFgrSCCAplLQ6ioXJRVEUUsYAZHSYKitDoVOy_q9GRpa0VIfsbLN30dSfS-8B56XLaDazFdVLh8YYEBBq7cnTf-TUG628OTRxJI2QIvbQxQb6Kme0xkVTzm2zRhDY5Y5T7OLFLl7scsef3HGFt5Nh13l9sNGXrqXVVm-bD4x89iG-jAd4f3cVv74kNzj0_MmGL2yN9q0pHT4_-c1aCBFH3pP6BsGaj0c</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>876280207</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Acceptance by Honey Bee Guards of Non-Nestmates is not Increased by Treatment with Nestmate Odours</title><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Ratnieks, Francis L.W ; Kärcher, Martin H ; Firth, Verity ; Parks, Danielle ; Richards, Amanda ; Richards, Paul ; Helanterä, Heikki</creator><creatorcontrib>Ratnieks, Francis L.W ; Kärcher, Martin H ; Firth, Verity ; Parks, Danielle ; Richards, Amanda ; Richards, Paul ; Helanterä, Heikki</creatorcontrib><description>Honey bee, Apis mellifera, entrance guards use chemical cues to discriminate nestmates from non-nestmates. Previous research has shown that when wax combs are reciprocally swapped between two colonies, guards become more accepting of workers from the swap partner. However, when combs were transferred only one way, guards in the comb-receiver colony became more accepting of bees from the comb-donor colony, but not vice versa. Hence, the increased acceptance of non-nestmates caused by reciprocal comb swapping was not because of introduced bees acquiring odours from the transferred combs, which was surprising because comb wax was known to affect the odour of bees. In the current experiment, we caused workers to acquire either nestmate or non-nestmate odours by holding them for 15 min in a tube, which had previously held nestmates or non-nestmates and then measured their acceptance by entrance guards of nestmate or non-nestmate hives. When transferred workers had acquired odours of non-nestmates, acceptance by their own colony's guards significantly decreased to 66% from 91%. Conversely, the acceptance of non-nestmates that had acquired odours of the guards' own nestmates was unchanged, 25% vs. 25%. These results show that when equivalent changes in the odour of introduced bees are made, guards are more sensitive to changes that cause nestmates to acquire non-nestmate odours than vice versa. These results are also a likely explanation for the earlier and surprising results from the unidirectional comb swap experiment (Couvillon et al. 2007). We make a hypothesis for the underlying mechanism in terms of a multidimensional recognition cue space.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0179-1613</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1439-0310</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/j.1439-0310.2011.01918.x</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Animal behavior ; Apis mellifera ; Bees ; honey bees ; Odors ; Pheromones</subject><ispartof>Ethology, 2011-08, Vol.117 (8), p.655-663</ispartof><rights>2011 Blackwell Verlag GmbH</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4358-5c3e9a5e5d162f31b6119f32a46708d0fff22711e845b3a2504bea918826ae423</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fj.1439-0310.2011.01918.x$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fj.1439-0310.2011.01918.x$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,1412,27905,27906,45555,45556</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ratnieks, Francis L.W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kärcher, Martin H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Firth, Verity</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Parks, Danielle</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Richards, Amanda</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Richards, Paul</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Helanterä, Heikki</creatorcontrib><title>Acceptance by Honey Bee Guards of Non-Nestmates is not Increased by Treatment with Nestmate Odours</title><title>Ethology</title><description>Honey bee, Apis mellifera, entrance guards use chemical cues to discriminate nestmates from non-nestmates. Previous research has shown that when wax combs are reciprocally swapped between two colonies, guards become more accepting of workers from the swap partner. However, when combs were transferred only one way, guards in the comb-receiver colony became more accepting of bees from the comb-donor colony, but not vice versa. Hence, the increased acceptance of non-nestmates caused by reciprocal comb swapping was not because of introduced bees acquiring odours from the transferred combs, which was surprising because comb wax was known to affect the odour of bees. In the current experiment, we caused workers to acquire either nestmate or non-nestmate odours by holding them for 15 min in a tube, which had previously held nestmates or non-nestmates and then measured their acceptance by entrance guards of nestmate or non-nestmate hives. When transferred workers had acquired odours of non-nestmates, acceptance by their own colony's guards significantly decreased to 66% from 91%. Conversely, the acceptance of non-nestmates that had acquired odours of the guards' own nestmates was unchanged, 25% vs. 25%. These results show that when equivalent changes in the odour of introduced bees are made, guards are more sensitive to changes that cause nestmates to acquire non-nestmate odours than vice versa. These results are also a likely explanation for the earlier and surprising results from the unidirectional comb swap experiment (Couvillon et al. 2007). We make a hypothesis for the underlying mechanism in terms of a multidimensional recognition cue space.</description><subject>Animal behavior</subject><subject>Apis mellifera</subject><subject>Bees</subject><subject>honey bees</subject><subject>Odors</subject><subject>Pheromones</subject><issn>0179-1613</issn><issn>1439-0310</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2011</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpdkMtOwzAQRS0EEuXxDVhsWKV4bCdxFix4thWoLChCYjNykgmktEmJU9H-PQ6FLvBmxuNzR9eXMQ6iD_6cT_ugVRII5QdSAPQFJGD6qx3W2z7ssp6AOAkgArXPDpybCn9Xseqx9DLLaNHaKiOervmwrmjNr4j4YGmb3PG64OO6Csbk2rltyfHS8apu-ajKGrKO8k418W07p6rlX2X7zv9g_pjXy8Ydsb3Czhwd_9ZD9nx3O7keBg-Pg9H15UOQaRWaIMwUJTakMIdIFgrSCCAplLQ6ioXJRVEUUsYAZHSYKitDoVOy_q9GRpa0VIfsbLN30dSfS-8B56XLaDazFdVLh8YYEBBq7cnTf-TUG628OTRxJI2QIvbQxQb6Kme0xkVTzm2zRhDY5Y5T7OLFLl7scsef3HGFt5Nh13l9sNGXrqXVVm-bD4x89iG-jAd4f3cVv74kNzj0_MmGL2yN9q0pHT4_-c1aCBFH3pP6BsGaj0c</recordid><startdate>201108</startdate><enddate>201108</enddate><creator>Ratnieks, Francis L.W</creator><creator>Kärcher, Martin H</creator><creator>Firth, Verity</creator><creator>Parks, Danielle</creator><creator>Richards, Amanda</creator><creator>Richards, Paul</creator><creator>Helanterä, Heikki</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QR</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>P64</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201108</creationdate><title>Acceptance by Honey Bee Guards of Non-Nestmates is not Increased by Treatment with Nestmate Odours</title><author>Ratnieks, Francis L.W ; Kärcher, Martin H ; Firth, Verity ; Parks, Danielle ; Richards, Amanda ; Richards, Paul ; Helanterä, Heikki</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4358-5c3e9a5e5d162f31b6119f32a46708d0fff22711e845b3a2504bea918826ae423</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2011</creationdate><topic>Animal behavior</topic><topic>Apis mellifera</topic><topic>Bees</topic><topic>honey bees</topic><topic>Odors</topic><topic>Pheromones</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ratnieks, Francis L.W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kärcher, Martin H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Firth, Verity</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Parks, Danielle</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Richards, Amanda</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Richards, Paul</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Helanterä, Heikki</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Chemoreception Abstracts</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Ethology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ratnieks, Francis L.W</au><au>Kärcher, Martin H</au><au>Firth, Verity</au><au>Parks, Danielle</au><au>Richards, Amanda</au><au>Richards, Paul</au><au>Helanterä, Heikki</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Acceptance by Honey Bee Guards of Non-Nestmates is not Increased by Treatment with Nestmate Odours</atitle><jtitle>Ethology</jtitle><date>2011-08</date><risdate>2011</risdate><volume>117</volume><issue>8</issue><spage>655</spage><epage>663</epage><pages>655-663</pages><issn>0179-1613</issn><eissn>1439-0310</eissn><abstract>Honey bee, Apis mellifera, entrance guards use chemical cues to discriminate nestmates from non-nestmates. Previous research has shown that when wax combs are reciprocally swapped between two colonies, guards become more accepting of workers from the swap partner. However, when combs were transferred only one way, guards in the comb-receiver colony became more accepting of bees from the comb-donor colony, but not vice versa. Hence, the increased acceptance of non-nestmates caused by reciprocal comb swapping was not because of introduced bees acquiring odours from the transferred combs, which was surprising because comb wax was known to affect the odour of bees. In the current experiment, we caused workers to acquire either nestmate or non-nestmate odours by holding them for 15 min in a tube, which had previously held nestmates or non-nestmates and then measured their acceptance by entrance guards of nestmate or non-nestmate hives. When transferred workers had acquired odours of non-nestmates, acceptance by their own colony's guards significantly decreased to 66% from 91%. Conversely, the acceptance of non-nestmates that had acquired odours of the guards' own nestmates was unchanged, 25% vs. 25%. These results show that when equivalent changes in the odour of introduced bees are made, guards are more sensitive to changes that cause nestmates to acquire non-nestmate odours than vice versa. These results are also a likely explanation for the earlier and surprising results from the unidirectional comb swap experiment (Couvillon et al. 2007). We make a hypothesis for the underlying mechanism in terms of a multidimensional recognition cue space.</abstract><cop>Oxford, UK</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><doi>10.1111/j.1439-0310.2011.01918.x</doi><tpages>9</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0179-1613
ispartof Ethology, 2011-08, Vol.117 (8), p.655-663
issn 0179-1613
1439-0310
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_888101544
source Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete
subjects Animal behavior
Apis mellifera
Bees
honey bees
Odors
Pheromones
title Acceptance by Honey Bee Guards of Non-Nestmates is not Increased by Treatment with Nestmate Odours
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-19T16%3A51%3A41IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_wiley&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Acceptance%20by%20Honey%20Bee%20Guards%20of%20Non-Nestmates%20is%20not%20Increased%20by%20Treatment%20with%20Nestmate%20Odours&rft.jtitle=Ethology&rft.au=Ratnieks,%20Francis%20L.W&rft.date=2011-08&rft.volume=117&rft.issue=8&rft.spage=655&rft.epage=663&rft.pages=655-663&rft.issn=0179-1613&rft.eissn=1439-0310&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/j.1439-0310.2011.01918.x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_wiley%3E888101544%3C/proquest_wiley%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=876280207&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true