Three hours of perfusion culture prior to 28 days of static culture, enhances osteogenesis by human cells in a collagen GAG scaffold

In tissue engineering, bioreactors can be used to aid in the in vitro development of new tissue by providing biochemical and physical regulatory signals to cells and encouraging them to undergo differentiation and/or to produce extracellular matrix prior to in vivo implantation. This study examined...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Biotechnology and bioengineering 2011-05, Vol.108 (5), p.1203-1210
Hauptverfasser: Keogh, Michael B., Partap, Sonia, Daly, Jacqueline S., O'Brien, Fergal J.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1210
container_issue 5
container_start_page 1203
container_title Biotechnology and bioengineering
container_volume 108
creator Keogh, Michael B.
Partap, Sonia
Daly, Jacqueline S.
O'Brien, Fergal J.
description In tissue engineering, bioreactors can be used to aid in the in vitro development of new tissue by providing biochemical and physical regulatory signals to cells and encouraging them to undergo differentiation and/or to produce extracellular matrix prior to in vivo implantation. This study examined the effect of short term flow perfusion bioreactor culture, prior to long‐term static culture, on human osteoblast cell distribution and osteogenesis within a collagen glycosaminoglycan (CG) scaffold for bone tissue engineering. Human fetal osteoblasts (hFOB 1.19) were seeded onto CG scaffolds and pre‐cultured for 6 days. Constructs were then placed into the bioreactor and exposed to 3 × 1 h bouts of steady flow (1 mL/min) separated by 7 h of no flow over a 24‐h period. The constructs were then cultured under static osteogenic conditions for up to 28 days. Results show that the bioreactor and static culture control groups displayed similar cell numbers and metabolic activity. Histologically, however, peripheral cell‐encapsulation was observed in the static controls, whereas, improved migration and homogenous cell distribution was seen in the bioreactor groups. Gene expression analysis showed that all osteogenic markers investigated displayed greater levels of expression in the bioreactor groups compared to static controls. While static groups showed increased mineral deposition; mechanical testing revealed that there was no difference in the compressive modulus between bioreactor and static groups. In conclusion, a flow perfusion bioreactor improved construct homogeneity by preventing peripheral encapsulation whilst also providing an enhanced osteogenic phenotype over static controls. Bioeng. 2011; 108:1203–1210. © 2010 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
doi_str_mv 10.1002/bit.23032
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_888096446</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>888096446</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5502-296581545cf51b89816af2fc9f20f576ab3d6847a294c94512d99c5237571ff83</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqF0U1vFCEYB3BiNHatHvwChpg0auK0wAxvx9rotqbRy6obL4RhwKWywwozaffuB5ft7tbERD0Rwu95gOcPwFOMjjFC5KT1wzGpUU3ugQlGkleISHQfTBBCrKqpJAfgUc5XZcsFYw_BAcGYUYnYBPycLZK1cBHHlGF0cGWTG7OPPTRjGMZk4Sr5mOAQIRGw0-tblQc9eLMnr6HtF7o3tpzlwcZvtrfZZ9iu4WJc6tLKhpCh76GGJoagC4DT0ynMRjsXQ_cYPHA6ZPtktx6CT-_ezs7Oq8uP04uz08vKUIpIRSSjAtOGGkdxK6TATDvijHQEOcqZbuuOiYZrIhsjG4pJJ6WhpOaUY-dEfQhebPuuUvwx2jyopc-bx-nexjErIQSSrGnY_yWVjUSU10W-_KfEjGNKECG00Od_0Ksy9r78uPTjhTX1Br3aIpNizsk6VQJY6rRWGKlN2qqkrW7TLvbZruHYLm13J_fxFnC0A7rMOrhUUvL5t2sQo4huBnOyddc-2PXfb1RvLmb7q6tthS-J39xV6PRdMV4Grr58mKr5HIuv55_fq3n9Cwz2zb4</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>857715435</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Three hours of perfusion culture prior to 28 days of static culture, enhances osteogenesis by human cells in a collagen GAG scaffold</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library All Journals</source><creator>Keogh, Michael B. ; Partap, Sonia ; Daly, Jacqueline S. ; O'Brien, Fergal J.</creator><creatorcontrib>Keogh, Michael B. ; Partap, Sonia ; Daly, Jacqueline S. ; O'Brien, Fergal J.</creatorcontrib><description>In tissue engineering, bioreactors can be used to aid in the in vitro development of new tissue by providing biochemical and physical regulatory signals to cells and encouraging them to undergo differentiation and/or to produce extracellular matrix prior to in vivo implantation. This study examined the effect of short term flow perfusion bioreactor culture, prior to long‐term static culture, on human osteoblast cell distribution and osteogenesis within a collagen glycosaminoglycan (CG) scaffold for bone tissue engineering. Human fetal osteoblasts (hFOB 1.19) were seeded onto CG scaffolds and pre‐cultured for 6 days. Constructs were then placed into the bioreactor and exposed to 3 × 1 h bouts of steady flow (1 mL/min) separated by 7 h of no flow over a 24‐h period. The constructs were then cultured under static osteogenic conditions for up to 28 days. Results show that the bioreactor and static culture control groups displayed similar cell numbers and metabolic activity. Histologically, however, peripheral cell‐encapsulation was observed in the static controls, whereas, improved migration and homogenous cell distribution was seen in the bioreactor groups. Gene expression analysis showed that all osteogenic markers investigated displayed greater levels of expression in the bioreactor groups compared to static controls. While static groups showed increased mineral deposition; mechanical testing revealed that there was no difference in the compressive modulus between bioreactor and static groups. In conclusion, a flow perfusion bioreactor improved construct homogeneity by preventing peripheral encapsulation whilst also providing an enhanced osteogenic phenotype over static controls. Bioeng. 2011; 108:1203–1210. © 2010 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0006-3592</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1097-0290</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1097-0290</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/bit.23032</identifier><identifier>PMID: 21165906</identifier><identifier>CODEN: BIBIAU</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Hoboken: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company</publisher><subject>Biocompatibility ; Biological and medical sciences ; Biomedical materials ; Bioreactors ; Biotechnology ; Cell adhesion &amp; migration ; Cells ; Cells, Cultured ; Collagen ; Construction ; Control equipment ; Culture ; Effects ; flow perfusion bioreactor ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Gene expression ; Genotype &amp; phenotype ; Glycosaminoglycans ; Human ; Humans ; Methods. Procedures. Technologies ; Osteogenesis ; Perfusion ; scaffold ; Scaffolds ; Signal transduction ; Tissue engineering ; Various methods and equipments</subject><ispartof>Biotechnology and bioengineering, 2011-05, Vol.108 (5), p.1203-1210</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2010 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.</rights><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright John Wiley and Sons, Limited May 2011</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5502-296581545cf51b89816af2fc9f20f576ab3d6847a294c94512d99c5237571ff83</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5502-296581545cf51b89816af2fc9f20f576ab3d6847a294c94512d99c5237571ff83</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Fbit.23032$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Fbit.23032$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1417,27924,27925,45574,45575</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=24065058$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21165906$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Keogh, Michael B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Partap, Sonia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Daly, Jacqueline S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>O'Brien, Fergal J.</creatorcontrib><title>Three hours of perfusion culture prior to 28 days of static culture, enhances osteogenesis by human cells in a collagen GAG scaffold</title><title>Biotechnology and bioengineering</title><addtitle>Biotechnol. Bioeng</addtitle><description>In tissue engineering, bioreactors can be used to aid in the in vitro development of new tissue by providing biochemical and physical regulatory signals to cells and encouraging them to undergo differentiation and/or to produce extracellular matrix prior to in vivo implantation. This study examined the effect of short term flow perfusion bioreactor culture, prior to long‐term static culture, on human osteoblast cell distribution and osteogenesis within a collagen glycosaminoglycan (CG) scaffold for bone tissue engineering. Human fetal osteoblasts (hFOB 1.19) were seeded onto CG scaffolds and pre‐cultured for 6 days. Constructs were then placed into the bioreactor and exposed to 3 × 1 h bouts of steady flow (1 mL/min) separated by 7 h of no flow over a 24‐h period. The constructs were then cultured under static osteogenic conditions for up to 28 days. Results show that the bioreactor and static culture control groups displayed similar cell numbers and metabolic activity. Histologically, however, peripheral cell‐encapsulation was observed in the static controls, whereas, improved migration and homogenous cell distribution was seen in the bioreactor groups. Gene expression analysis showed that all osteogenic markers investigated displayed greater levels of expression in the bioreactor groups compared to static controls. While static groups showed increased mineral deposition; mechanical testing revealed that there was no difference in the compressive modulus between bioreactor and static groups. In conclusion, a flow perfusion bioreactor improved construct homogeneity by preventing peripheral encapsulation whilst also providing an enhanced osteogenic phenotype over static controls. Bioeng. 2011; 108:1203–1210. © 2010 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.</description><subject>Biocompatibility</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Biomedical materials</subject><subject>Bioreactors</subject><subject>Biotechnology</subject><subject>Cell adhesion &amp; migration</subject><subject>Cells</subject><subject>Cells, Cultured</subject><subject>Collagen</subject><subject>Construction</subject><subject>Control equipment</subject><subject>Culture</subject><subject>Effects</subject><subject>flow perfusion bioreactor</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Gene expression</subject><subject>Genotype &amp; phenotype</subject><subject>Glycosaminoglycans</subject><subject>Human</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Methods. Procedures. Technologies</subject><subject>Osteogenesis</subject><subject>Perfusion</subject><subject>scaffold</subject><subject>Scaffolds</subject><subject>Signal transduction</subject><subject>Tissue engineering</subject><subject>Various methods and equipments</subject><issn>0006-3592</issn><issn>1097-0290</issn><issn>1097-0290</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2011</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqF0U1vFCEYB3BiNHatHvwChpg0auK0wAxvx9rotqbRy6obL4RhwKWywwozaffuB5ft7tbERD0Rwu95gOcPwFOMjjFC5KT1wzGpUU3ugQlGkleISHQfTBBCrKqpJAfgUc5XZcsFYw_BAcGYUYnYBPycLZK1cBHHlGF0cGWTG7OPPTRjGMZk4Sr5mOAQIRGw0-tblQc9eLMnr6HtF7o3tpzlwcZvtrfZZ9iu4WJc6tLKhpCh76GGJoagC4DT0ynMRjsXQ_cYPHA6ZPtktx6CT-_ezs7Oq8uP04uz08vKUIpIRSSjAtOGGkdxK6TATDvijHQEOcqZbuuOiYZrIhsjG4pJJ6WhpOaUY-dEfQhebPuuUvwx2jyopc-bx-nexjErIQSSrGnY_yWVjUSU10W-_KfEjGNKECG00Od_0Ksy9r78uPTjhTX1Br3aIpNizsk6VQJY6rRWGKlN2qqkrW7TLvbZruHYLm13J_fxFnC0A7rMOrhUUvL5t2sQo4huBnOyddc-2PXfb1RvLmb7q6tthS-J39xV6PRdMV4Grr58mKr5HIuv55_fq3n9Cwz2zb4</recordid><startdate>201105</startdate><enddate>201105</enddate><creator>Keogh, Michael B.</creator><creator>Partap, Sonia</creator><creator>Daly, Jacqueline S.</creator><creator>O'Brien, Fergal J.</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company</general><general>Wiley</general><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QF</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7QQ</scope><scope>7SC</scope><scope>7SE</scope><scope>7SP</scope><scope>7SR</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7TA</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>7U5</scope><scope>8BQ</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F28</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>H8G</scope><scope>JG9</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>L~C</scope><scope>L~D</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>7QP</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201105</creationdate><title>Three hours of perfusion culture prior to 28 days of static culture, enhances osteogenesis by human cells in a collagen GAG scaffold</title><author>Keogh, Michael B. ; Partap, Sonia ; Daly, Jacqueline S. ; O'Brien, Fergal J.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5502-296581545cf51b89816af2fc9f20f576ab3d6847a294c94512d99c5237571ff83</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2011</creationdate><topic>Biocompatibility</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Biomedical materials</topic><topic>Bioreactors</topic><topic>Biotechnology</topic><topic>Cell adhesion &amp; migration</topic><topic>Cells</topic><topic>Cells, Cultured</topic><topic>Collagen</topic><topic>Construction</topic><topic>Control equipment</topic><topic>Culture</topic><topic>Effects</topic><topic>flow perfusion bioreactor</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Gene expression</topic><topic>Genotype &amp; phenotype</topic><topic>Glycosaminoglycans</topic><topic>Human</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Methods. Procedures. Technologies</topic><topic>Osteogenesis</topic><topic>Perfusion</topic><topic>scaffold</topic><topic>Scaffolds</topic><topic>Signal transduction</topic><topic>Tissue engineering</topic><topic>Various methods and equipments</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Keogh, Michael B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Partap, Sonia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Daly, Jacqueline S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>O'Brien, Fergal J.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Aluminium Industry Abstracts</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Ceramic Abstracts</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts</collection><collection>Corrosion Abstracts</collection><collection>Electronics &amp; Communications Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineered Materials Abstracts</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Materials Business File</collection><collection>Mechanical &amp; Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Solid State and Superconductivity Abstracts</collection><collection>METADEX</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ANTE: Abstracts in New Technology &amp; Engineering</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>Copper Technical Reference Library</collection><collection>Materials Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts – Academic</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Professional</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Calcium &amp; Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Biotechnology and bioengineering</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Keogh, Michael B.</au><au>Partap, Sonia</au><au>Daly, Jacqueline S.</au><au>O'Brien, Fergal J.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Three hours of perfusion culture prior to 28 days of static culture, enhances osteogenesis by human cells in a collagen GAG scaffold</atitle><jtitle>Biotechnology and bioengineering</jtitle><addtitle>Biotechnol. Bioeng</addtitle><date>2011-05</date><risdate>2011</risdate><volume>108</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>1203</spage><epage>1210</epage><pages>1203-1210</pages><issn>0006-3592</issn><issn>1097-0290</issn><eissn>1097-0290</eissn><coden>BIBIAU</coden><abstract>In tissue engineering, bioreactors can be used to aid in the in vitro development of new tissue by providing biochemical and physical regulatory signals to cells and encouraging them to undergo differentiation and/or to produce extracellular matrix prior to in vivo implantation. This study examined the effect of short term flow perfusion bioreactor culture, prior to long‐term static culture, on human osteoblast cell distribution and osteogenesis within a collagen glycosaminoglycan (CG) scaffold for bone tissue engineering. Human fetal osteoblasts (hFOB 1.19) were seeded onto CG scaffolds and pre‐cultured for 6 days. Constructs were then placed into the bioreactor and exposed to 3 × 1 h bouts of steady flow (1 mL/min) separated by 7 h of no flow over a 24‐h period. The constructs were then cultured under static osteogenic conditions for up to 28 days. Results show that the bioreactor and static culture control groups displayed similar cell numbers and metabolic activity. Histologically, however, peripheral cell‐encapsulation was observed in the static controls, whereas, improved migration and homogenous cell distribution was seen in the bioreactor groups. Gene expression analysis showed that all osteogenic markers investigated displayed greater levels of expression in the bioreactor groups compared to static controls. While static groups showed increased mineral deposition; mechanical testing revealed that there was no difference in the compressive modulus between bioreactor and static groups. In conclusion, a flow perfusion bioreactor improved construct homogeneity by preventing peripheral encapsulation whilst also providing an enhanced osteogenic phenotype over static controls. Bioeng. 2011; 108:1203–1210. © 2010 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.</abstract><cop>Hoboken</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company</pub><pmid>21165906</pmid><doi>10.1002/bit.23032</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0006-3592
ispartof Biotechnology and bioengineering, 2011-05, Vol.108 (5), p.1203-1210
issn 0006-3592
1097-0290
1097-0290
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_888096446
source MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library All Journals
subjects Biocompatibility
Biological and medical sciences
Biomedical materials
Bioreactors
Biotechnology
Cell adhesion & migration
Cells
Cells, Cultured
Collagen
Construction
Control equipment
Culture
Effects
flow perfusion bioreactor
Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology
Gene expression
Genotype & phenotype
Glycosaminoglycans
Human
Humans
Methods. Procedures. Technologies
Osteogenesis
Perfusion
scaffold
Scaffolds
Signal transduction
Tissue engineering
Various methods and equipments
title Three hours of perfusion culture prior to 28 days of static culture, enhances osteogenesis by human cells in a collagen GAG scaffold
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-06T06%3A46%3A24IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Three%20hours%20of%20perfusion%20culture%20prior%20to%2028%20days%20of%20static%20culture,%20enhances%20osteogenesis%20by%20human%20cells%20in%20a%20collagen%20GAG%20scaffold&rft.jtitle=Biotechnology%20and%20bioengineering&rft.au=Keogh,%20Michael%20B.&rft.date=2011-05&rft.volume=108&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=1203&rft.epage=1210&rft.pages=1203-1210&rft.issn=0006-3592&rft.eissn=1097-0290&rft.coden=BIBIAU&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/bit.23032&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E888096446%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=857715435&rft_id=info:pmid/21165906&rfr_iscdi=true