Analysis of prevalence, risk factors and molecular epidemiology of Clostridium difficile infection in Kuwait over a 3-year period
We conducted a prospective study to evaluate the prevalence and epidemiology of CDI in Kuwait government hospitals over a 3-year period, January 2003 to December 2005, to determine the ribotypes responsible for CDI and to estimate the prevalence of ribotype 027. We also conducted a case-control stud...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Anaerobe 2010-12, Vol.16 (6), p.560-565 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 565 |
---|---|
container_issue | 6 |
container_start_page | 560 |
container_title | Anaerobe |
container_volume | 16 |
creator | Jamal, W. Rotimi, V.O. Brazier, J. Duerden, B.I. |
description | We conducted a prospective study to evaluate the prevalence and epidemiology of CDI in Kuwait government hospitals over a 3-year period, January 2003 to December 2005, to determine the ribotypes responsible for CDI and to estimate the prevalence of ribotype 027. We also conducted a case-control study to identify the risk factors in our patient population. A total of 697 stool samples from patients with suspected CDI were obtained and sent to Anaerobe Reference Laboratory, Faculty of Medicine, Kuwait University for
Clostridium difficile toxin detection, culture and PCR ribotyping.
During the period, 73 (10.5%) out of 697 patients met the case definition of CDI. Of these, 56 (76.7%) were hospital-acquired and 17 (23.3%) were from outpatient clinics. Thus, the prevalence of hospital-acquired CDI amongst patients with diarrhoea was 8% over the study period; the prevalence in 2003, 2004 and 2005 was 9.7%, 7.8% and 7.2%, respectively. Our data showed that 42.9% of the CDI patients were above 60 years, of which >79% were aged 71 years and above. Patients with CDI were more likely than the controls to have been exposed to immunosuppressive drugs and feeding via nasogastric tube. The most common ribotypes isolated during this study were 002, 001, 126 and 140 and they represent 55.1% of all isolates. PCR ribotype 027 was not isolated. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.anaerobe.2010.09.003 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_888095636</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S1075996410001599</els_id><sourcerecordid>822362016</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c399t-48bae65547acde82afa0564e6006decaf1c644b1cf7cbf16a563efbff090be643</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkU1v1DAQhi0Eoh_wFyrfuJDFThwnvlGtyoeoxAXOlmOP0SxOHOxkqz3yz3G0LdeePLKed0Z6H0JuONtxxuWHw85MBlIcYFez8snUjrHmBbnkTLVVX3fi5TZ3baWUFBfkKucDY5yLtn1NLmrW912n2kvy93Yy4ZQx0-jpnOBoAkwW3tOE-Tf1xi4xZWomR8cYwK7BJAozOhgxhvjrtMX2IeYlocN1pA69R4sBKE4e7IJxKhP9tj4YXGg8QqKGNtUJyp4ZEkb3hrzyJmR4-_hek5-f7n7sv1T33z9_3d_eV7ZRaqlEPxiQbSs6Yx30tfGGtVKAZEw6sMZzK4UYuPWdHTyXppUN-MF7ptgAUjTX5N1575zinxXyokfMFkIwE8Q1677vS3Wykc-Tdd3I0vpGyjNpU8w5gddzwtGkk-ZMb570QT950psnzZQunkrw5vHEOozg_seexBTg4xmAUskRIelscTPjMJVatYv43I1_5FOqWA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>822362016</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Analysis of prevalence, risk factors and molecular epidemiology of Clostridium difficile infection in Kuwait over a 3-year period</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Jamal, W. ; Rotimi, V.O. ; Brazier, J. ; Duerden, B.I.</creator><creatorcontrib>Jamal, W. ; Rotimi, V.O. ; Brazier, J. ; Duerden, B.I.</creatorcontrib><description>We conducted a prospective study to evaluate the prevalence and epidemiology of CDI in Kuwait government hospitals over a 3-year period, January 2003 to December 2005, to determine the ribotypes responsible for CDI and to estimate the prevalence of ribotype 027. We also conducted a case-control study to identify the risk factors in our patient population. A total of 697 stool samples from patients with suspected CDI were obtained and sent to Anaerobe Reference Laboratory, Faculty of Medicine, Kuwait University for
Clostridium difficile toxin detection, culture and PCR ribotyping.
During the period, 73 (10.5%) out of 697 patients met the case definition of CDI. Of these, 56 (76.7%) were hospital-acquired and 17 (23.3%) were from outpatient clinics. Thus, the prevalence of hospital-acquired CDI amongst patients with diarrhoea was 8% over the study period; the prevalence in 2003, 2004 and 2005 was 9.7%, 7.8% and 7.2%, respectively. Our data showed that 42.9% of the CDI patients were above 60 years, of which >79% were aged 71 years and above. Patients with CDI were more likely than the controls to have been exposed to immunosuppressive drugs and feeding via nasogastric tube. The most common ribotypes isolated during this study were 002, 001, 126 and 140 and they represent 55.1% of all isolates. PCR ribotype 027 was not isolated.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1075-9964</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1095-8274</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.anaerobe.2010.09.003</identifier><identifier>PMID: 20887795</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Case-Control Studies ; Clostridium difficile ; Clostridium difficile - classification ; Clostridium difficile - genetics ; Clostridium difficile - isolation & purification ; Clostridium Infections - epidemiology ; Clostridium Infections - microbiology ; Cross Infection - epidemiology ; Cross Infection - microbiology ; Epidemiology ; Feces - microbiology ; Hospitals ; Humans ; Kuwait ; Kuwait - epidemiology ; Molecular Epidemiology ; PCR ribotypes ; Polymerase Chain Reaction ; Prevalence ; Ribotyping ; Risk Factors</subject><ispartof>Anaerobe, 2010-12, Vol.16 (6), p.560-565</ispartof><rights>2010 Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c399t-48bae65547acde82afa0564e6006decaf1c644b1cf7cbf16a563efbff090be643</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c399t-48bae65547acde82afa0564e6006decaf1c644b1cf7cbf16a563efbff090be643</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1075996410001599$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20887795$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Jamal, W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rotimi, V.O.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brazier, J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Duerden, B.I.</creatorcontrib><title>Analysis of prevalence, risk factors and molecular epidemiology of Clostridium difficile infection in Kuwait over a 3-year period</title><title>Anaerobe</title><addtitle>Anaerobe</addtitle><description>We conducted a prospective study to evaluate the prevalence and epidemiology of CDI in Kuwait government hospitals over a 3-year period, January 2003 to December 2005, to determine the ribotypes responsible for CDI and to estimate the prevalence of ribotype 027. We also conducted a case-control study to identify the risk factors in our patient population. A total of 697 stool samples from patients with suspected CDI were obtained and sent to Anaerobe Reference Laboratory, Faculty of Medicine, Kuwait University for
Clostridium difficile toxin detection, culture and PCR ribotyping.
During the period, 73 (10.5%) out of 697 patients met the case definition of CDI. Of these, 56 (76.7%) were hospital-acquired and 17 (23.3%) were from outpatient clinics. Thus, the prevalence of hospital-acquired CDI amongst patients with diarrhoea was 8% over the study period; the prevalence in 2003, 2004 and 2005 was 9.7%, 7.8% and 7.2%, respectively. Our data showed that 42.9% of the CDI patients were above 60 years, of which >79% were aged 71 years and above. Patients with CDI were more likely than the controls to have been exposed to immunosuppressive drugs and feeding via nasogastric tube. The most common ribotypes isolated during this study were 002, 001, 126 and 140 and they represent 55.1% of all isolates. PCR ribotype 027 was not isolated.</description><subject>Case-Control Studies</subject><subject>Clostridium difficile</subject><subject>Clostridium difficile - classification</subject><subject>Clostridium difficile - genetics</subject><subject>Clostridium difficile - isolation & purification</subject><subject>Clostridium Infections - epidemiology</subject><subject>Clostridium Infections - microbiology</subject><subject>Cross Infection - epidemiology</subject><subject>Cross Infection - microbiology</subject><subject>Epidemiology</subject><subject>Feces - microbiology</subject><subject>Hospitals</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Kuwait</subject><subject>Kuwait - epidemiology</subject><subject>Molecular Epidemiology</subject><subject>PCR ribotypes</subject><subject>Polymerase Chain Reaction</subject><subject>Prevalence</subject><subject>Ribotyping</subject><subject>Risk Factors</subject><issn>1075-9964</issn><issn>1095-8274</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2010</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkU1v1DAQhi0Eoh_wFyrfuJDFThwnvlGtyoeoxAXOlmOP0SxOHOxkqz3yz3G0LdeePLKed0Z6H0JuONtxxuWHw85MBlIcYFez8snUjrHmBbnkTLVVX3fi5TZ3baWUFBfkKucDY5yLtn1NLmrW912n2kvy93Yy4ZQx0-jpnOBoAkwW3tOE-Tf1xi4xZWomR8cYwK7BJAozOhgxhvjrtMX2IeYlocN1pA69R4sBKE4e7IJxKhP9tj4YXGg8QqKGNtUJyp4ZEkb3hrzyJmR4-_hek5-f7n7sv1T33z9_3d_eV7ZRaqlEPxiQbSs6Yx30tfGGtVKAZEw6sMZzK4UYuPWdHTyXppUN-MF7ptgAUjTX5N1575zinxXyokfMFkIwE8Q1677vS3Wykc-Tdd3I0vpGyjNpU8w5gddzwtGkk-ZMb570QT950psnzZQunkrw5vHEOozg_seexBTg4xmAUskRIelscTPjMJVatYv43I1_5FOqWA</recordid><startdate>20101201</startdate><enddate>20101201</enddate><creator>Jamal, W.</creator><creator>Rotimi, V.O.</creator><creator>Brazier, J.</creator><creator>Duerden, B.I.</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>C1K</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20101201</creationdate><title>Analysis of prevalence, risk factors and molecular epidemiology of Clostridium difficile infection in Kuwait over a 3-year period</title><author>Jamal, W. ; Rotimi, V.O. ; Brazier, J. ; Duerden, B.I.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c399t-48bae65547acde82afa0564e6006decaf1c644b1cf7cbf16a563efbff090be643</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2010</creationdate><topic>Case-Control Studies</topic><topic>Clostridium difficile</topic><topic>Clostridium difficile - classification</topic><topic>Clostridium difficile - genetics</topic><topic>Clostridium difficile - isolation & purification</topic><topic>Clostridium Infections - epidemiology</topic><topic>Clostridium Infections - microbiology</topic><topic>Cross Infection - epidemiology</topic><topic>Cross Infection - microbiology</topic><topic>Epidemiology</topic><topic>Feces - microbiology</topic><topic>Hospitals</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Kuwait</topic><topic>Kuwait - epidemiology</topic><topic>Molecular Epidemiology</topic><topic>PCR ribotypes</topic><topic>Polymerase Chain Reaction</topic><topic>Prevalence</topic><topic>Ribotyping</topic><topic>Risk Factors</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Jamal, W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rotimi, V.O.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brazier, J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Duerden, B.I.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><jtitle>Anaerobe</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Jamal, W.</au><au>Rotimi, V.O.</au><au>Brazier, J.</au><au>Duerden, B.I.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Analysis of prevalence, risk factors and molecular epidemiology of Clostridium difficile infection in Kuwait over a 3-year period</atitle><jtitle>Anaerobe</jtitle><addtitle>Anaerobe</addtitle><date>2010-12-01</date><risdate>2010</risdate><volume>16</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>560</spage><epage>565</epage><pages>560-565</pages><issn>1075-9964</issn><eissn>1095-8274</eissn><abstract>We conducted a prospective study to evaluate the prevalence and epidemiology of CDI in Kuwait government hospitals over a 3-year period, January 2003 to December 2005, to determine the ribotypes responsible for CDI and to estimate the prevalence of ribotype 027. We also conducted a case-control study to identify the risk factors in our patient population. A total of 697 stool samples from patients with suspected CDI were obtained and sent to Anaerobe Reference Laboratory, Faculty of Medicine, Kuwait University for
Clostridium difficile toxin detection, culture and PCR ribotyping.
During the period, 73 (10.5%) out of 697 patients met the case definition of CDI. Of these, 56 (76.7%) were hospital-acquired and 17 (23.3%) were from outpatient clinics. Thus, the prevalence of hospital-acquired CDI amongst patients with diarrhoea was 8% over the study period; the prevalence in 2003, 2004 and 2005 was 9.7%, 7.8% and 7.2%, respectively. Our data showed that 42.9% of the CDI patients were above 60 years, of which >79% were aged 71 years and above. Patients with CDI were more likely than the controls to have been exposed to immunosuppressive drugs and feeding via nasogastric tube. The most common ribotypes isolated during this study were 002, 001, 126 and 140 and they represent 55.1% of all isolates. PCR ribotype 027 was not isolated.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>20887795</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.anaerobe.2010.09.003</doi><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1075-9964 |
ispartof | Anaerobe, 2010-12, Vol.16 (6), p.560-565 |
issn | 1075-9964 1095-8274 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_888095636 |
source | MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals |
subjects | Case-Control Studies Clostridium difficile Clostridium difficile - classification Clostridium difficile - genetics Clostridium difficile - isolation & purification Clostridium Infections - epidemiology Clostridium Infections - microbiology Cross Infection - epidemiology Cross Infection - microbiology Epidemiology Feces - microbiology Hospitals Humans Kuwait Kuwait - epidemiology Molecular Epidemiology PCR ribotypes Polymerase Chain Reaction Prevalence Ribotyping Risk Factors |
title | Analysis of prevalence, risk factors and molecular epidemiology of Clostridium difficile infection in Kuwait over a 3-year period |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-09T18%3A53%3A31IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Analysis%20of%20prevalence,%20risk%20factors%20and%20molecular%20epidemiology%20of%20Clostridium%20difficile%20infection%20in%20Kuwait%20over%20a%203-year%20period&rft.jtitle=Anaerobe&rft.au=Jamal,%20W.&rft.date=2010-12-01&rft.volume=16&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=560&rft.epage=565&rft.pages=560-565&rft.issn=1075-9964&rft.eissn=1095-8274&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.anaerobe.2010.09.003&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E822362016%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=822362016&rft_id=info:pmid/20887795&rft_els_id=S1075996410001599&rfr_iscdi=true |