Image-guided brachytherapy for cervical cancer: A Canadian Brachytherapy Group survey

Abstract Purpose To survey the current use and future plans for image-guided brachytherapy (BT) for cervical cancer by radiation oncologists in Canada. Methods and Materials Canadian radiation oncologists treating gynecologic malignancies were identified in January 2009. A 29-item questionnaire (Eng...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Brachytherapy 2011-09, Vol.10 (5), p.345-351
Hauptverfasser: Pavamani, Simon, D’Souza, David P, Portelance, Lorraine, Craighead, Peter S, Pearce, Andrew G, Traptow, Laurel L, Doll, Corinne M
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 351
container_issue 5
container_start_page 345
container_title Brachytherapy
container_volume 10
creator Pavamani, Simon
D’Souza, David P
Portelance, Lorraine
Craighead, Peter S
Pearce, Andrew G
Traptow, Laurel L
Doll, Corinne M
description Abstract Purpose To survey the current use and future plans for image-guided brachytherapy (BT) for cervical cancer by radiation oncologists in Canada. Methods and Materials Canadian radiation oncologists treating gynecologic malignancies were identified in January 2009. A 29-item questionnaire (English and French) querying the current practice in the use of imaging in BT planning, and plans for transition to three-dimensional (3D) image guidance for BT for cervical cancer (curative intent, intact cervix), was electronically circulated. Questionnaire responses were tabulated and analyzed by respondent and by center. Results Response rate was 62% (36 of 58 radiation oncologists), representing 71% (22 of 31) of Canadian radiation oncology centers with a gynecologic BT facility. Most of the centers were using high-dose-rate BT (68%), followed by low-dose-rate BT (23%) and pulsed dose-rate BT (10%). Main imaging used for treatment planning by center was plain X-ray (50%), computerized tomography (CT) (45%), and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) (5%). For respondents using CT or MRI for planning, point A was the most common dose prescription point (50%), followed by gross tumor volume/clinical target volume as per Groupe Européen de Curiethérapie and the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology guidelines (44%). For centers using plain X-rays for planning, 73% planned to transition to a 3D image-based approach, with the majority to adopt CT imaging. Eighty percent of respondents agreed that 3D image-guided BT should become standard of care for treatment of cervical cancer in Canada, and additionally support the development of national guidelines. Conclusions Most of the Canadian radiation oncologists surveyed and Canadian cancer centers are either using 3D imaging and planning or transitioning to a 3D image-based approach within the next year. Point A remained a commonly documented prescription point. Access to MRI was very low. These results may lead to national treatment guidelines.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.brachy.2010.12.004
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_887939153</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S1538472110003867</els_id><sourcerecordid>887939153</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c482t-7b9a47c2cf042dc9971461b30f669b1eb88df027c9b90a1ea78cba259a0dba4b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkU9v1DAQxS0EoqXwDRDKjVMW_9vY5oBUVtBWqsSh7dka25PWSzZZ7M1K-fZ1lBYJLj3NaPTeG81vCPnI6IpR1nzZrlwC_zCtOJ1HfEWpfEVOmVaiZlKa16VfC11LxdkJeZfzlhabEeItOeFMyLWS8pTcXe3gHuv7MQYM1ZJ4eMAE-6lqh1R5TMfooas89KX_Wp1XG-ghROir7_-oL9Iw7qs8piNO78mbFrqMH57qGbn7-eN2c1lf_7q42pxf115qfqiVMyCV576lkgdvjGKyYU7QtmmMY-i0Di3lyhtnKDAEpb0DvjZAgwPpxBn5vOTu0_BnxHywu5g9dh30OIzZaq2MMAVDUcpF6dOQc8LW7lPcQZoso3bmabd2ud7OPC3jtvAstk9PC0a3w_DX9AywCL4tAixnHiMmm33EgirEhP5gwxBf2vB_gO9iPyP_jRPm7TCmviC0zOZisDfzT-eXMkqp0I0Sj6RMnc4</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>887939153</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Image-guided brachytherapy for cervical cancer: A Canadian Brachytherapy Group survey</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)</source><creator>Pavamani, Simon ; D’Souza, David P ; Portelance, Lorraine ; Craighead, Peter S ; Pearce, Andrew G ; Traptow, Laurel L ; Doll, Corinne M</creator><creatorcontrib>Pavamani, Simon ; D’Souza, David P ; Portelance, Lorraine ; Craighead, Peter S ; Pearce, Andrew G ; Traptow, Laurel L ; Doll, Corinne M</creatorcontrib><description>Abstract Purpose To survey the current use and future plans for image-guided brachytherapy (BT) for cervical cancer by radiation oncologists in Canada. Methods and Materials Canadian radiation oncologists treating gynecologic malignancies were identified in January 2009. A 29-item questionnaire (English and French) querying the current practice in the use of imaging in BT planning, and plans for transition to three-dimensional (3D) image guidance for BT for cervical cancer (curative intent, intact cervix), was electronically circulated. Questionnaire responses were tabulated and analyzed by respondent and by center. Results Response rate was 62% (36 of 58 radiation oncologists), representing 71% (22 of 31) of Canadian radiation oncology centers with a gynecologic BT facility. Most of the centers were using high-dose-rate BT (68%), followed by low-dose-rate BT (23%) and pulsed dose-rate BT (10%). Main imaging used for treatment planning by center was plain X-ray (50%), computerized tomography (CT) (45%), and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) (5%). For respondents using CT or MRI for planning, point A was the most common dose prescription point (50%), followed by gross tumor volume/clinical target volume as per Groupe Européen de Curiethérapie and the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology guidelines (44%). For centers using plain X-rays for planning, 73% planned to transition to a 3D image-based approach, with the majority to adopt CT imaging. Eighty percent of respondents agreed that 3D image-guided BT should become standard of care for treatment of cervical cancer in Canada, and additionally support the development of national guidelines. Conclusions Most of the Canadian radiation oncologists surveyed and Canadian cancer centers are either using 3D imaging and planning or transitioning to a 3D image-based approach within the next year. Point A remained a commonly documented prescription point. Access to MRI was very low. These results may lead to national treatment guidelines.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1538-4721</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-1449</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.brachy.2010.12.004</identifier><identifier>PMID: 21345744</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Brachytherapy - methods ; Canada ; Cervical cancer ; Female ; Hematology, Oncology and Palliative Medicine ; Humans ; Image-guided brachytherapy ; Imaging, Three-Dimensional ; Magnetic Resonance Imaging ; Pattern of practice ; Practice Patterns, Physicians ; Prostheses and Implants ; Radiology ; Radiotherapy Dosage ; Radiotherapy, Image-Guided ; Tomography, X-Ray Computed ; Uterine Cervical Neoplasms - radiotherapy</subject><ispartof>Brachytherapy, 2011-09, Vol.10 (5), p.345-351</ispartof><rights>2011</rights><rights>Copyright © 2011. Published by Elsevier Inc.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c482t-7b9a47c2cf042dc9971461b30f669b1eb88df027c9b90a1ea78cba259a0dba4b3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c482t-7b9a47c2cf042dc9971461b30f669b1eb88df027c9b90a1ea78cba259a0dba4b3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.brachy.2010.12.004$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21345744$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Pavamani, Simon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>D’Souza, David P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Portelance, Lorraine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Craighead, Peter S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pearce, Andrew G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Traptow, Laurel L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Doll, Corinne M</creatorcontrib><title>Image-guided brachytherapy for cervical cancer: A Canadian Brachytherapy Group survey</title><title>Brachytherapy</title><addtitle>Brachytherapy</addtitle><description>Abstract Purpose To survey the current use and future plans for image-guided brachytherapy (BT) for cervical cancer by radiation oncologists in Canada. Methods and Materials Canadian radiation oncologists treating gynecologic malignancies were identified in January 2009. A 29-item questionnaire (English and French) querying the current practice in the use of imaging in BT planning, and plans for transition to three-dimensional (3D) image guidance for BT for cervical cancer (curative intent, intact cervix), was electronically circulated. Questionnaire responses were tabulated and analyzed by respondent and by center. Results Response rate was 62% (36 of 58 radiation oncologists), representing 71% (22 of 31) of Canadian radiation oncology centers with a gynecologic BT facility. Most of the centers were using high-dose-rate BT (68%), followed by low-dose-rate BT (23%) and pulsed dose-rate BT (10%). Main imaging used for treatment planning by center was plain X-ray (50%), computerized tomography (CT) (45%), and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) (5%). For respondents using CT or MRI for planning, point A was the most common dose prescription point (50%), followed by gross tumor volume/clinical target volume as per Groupe Européen de Curiethérapie and the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology guidelines (44%). For centers using plain X-rays for planning, 73% planned to transition to a 3D image-based approach, with the majority to adopt CT imaging. Eighty percent of respondents agreed that 3D image-guided BT should become standard of care for treatment of cervical cancer in Canada, and additionally support the development of national guidelines. Conclusions Most of the Canadian radiation oncologists surveyed and Canadian cancer centers are either using 3D imaging and planning or transitioning to a 3D image-based approach within the next year. Point A remained a commonly documented prescription point. Access to MRI was very low. These results may lead to national treatment guidelines.</description><subject>Brachytherapy - methods</subject><subject>Canada</subject><subject>Cervical cancer</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Hematology, Oncology and Palliative Medicine</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Image-guided brachytherapy</subject><subject>Imaging, Three-Dimensional</subject><subject>Magnetic Resonance Imaging</subject><subject>Pattern of practice</subject><subject>Practice Patterns, Physicians</subject><subject>Prostheses and Implants</subject><subject>Radiology</subject><subject>Radiotherapy Dosage</subject><subject>Radiotherapy, Image-Guided</subject><subject>Tomography, X-Ray Computed</subject><subject>Uterine Cervical Neoplasms - radiotherapy</subject><issn>1538-4721</issn><issn>1873-1449</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2011</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkU9v1DAQxS0EoqXwDRDKjVMW_9vY5oBUVtBWqsSh7dka25PWSzZZ7M1K-fZ1lBYJLj3NaPTeG81vCPnI6IpR1nzZrlwC_zCtOJ1HfEWpfEVOmVaiZlKa16VfC11LxdkJeZfzlhabEeItOeFMyLWS8pTcXe3gHuv7MQYM1ZJ4eMAE-6lqh1R5TMfooas89KX_Wp1XG-ghROir7_-oL9Iw7qs8piNO78mbFrqMH57qGbn7-eN2c1lf_7q42pxf115qfqiVMyCV576lkgdvjGKyYU7QtmmMY-i0Di3lyhtnKDAEpb0DvjZAgwPpxBn5vOTu0_BnxHywu5g9dh30OIzZaq2MMAVDUcpF6dOQc8LW7lPcQZoso3bmabd2ud7OPC3jtvAstk9PC0a3w_DX9AywCL4tAixnHiMmm33EgirEhP5gwxBf2vB_gO9iPyP_jRPm7TCmviC0zOZisDfzT-eXMkqp0I0Sj6RMnc4</recordid><startdate>20110901</startdate><enddate>20110901</enddate><creator>Pavamani, Simon</creator><creator>D’Souza, David P</creator><creator>Portelance, Lorraine</creator><creator>Craighead, Peter S</creator><creator>Pearce, Andrew G</creator><creator>Traptow, Laurel L</creator><creator>Doll, Corinne M</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20110901</creationdate><title>Image-guided brachytherapy for cervical cancer: A Canadian Brachytherapy Group survey</title><author>Pavamani, Simon ; D’Souza, David P ; Portelance, Lorraine ; Craighead, Peter S ; Pearce, Andrew G ; Traptow, Laurel L ; Doll, Corinne M</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c482t-7b9a47c2cf042dc9971461b30f669b1eb88df027c9b90a1ea78cba259a0dba4b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2011</creationdate><topic>Brachytherapy - methods</topic><topic>Canada</topic><topic>Cervical cancer</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Hematology, Oncology and Palliative Medicine</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Image-guided brachytherapy</topic><topic>Imaging, Three-Dimensional</topic><topic>Magnetic Resonance Imaging</topic><topic>Pattern of practice</topic><topic>Practice Patterns, Physicians</topic><topic>Prostheses and Implants</topic><topic>Radiology</topic><topic>Radiotherapy Dosage</topic><topic>Radiotherapy, Image-Guided</topic><topic>Tomography, X-Ray Computed</topic><topic>Uterine Cervical Neoplasms - radiotherapy</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Pavamani, Simon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>D’Souza, David P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Portelance, Lorraine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Craighead, Peter S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pearce, Andrew G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Traptow, Laurel L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Doll, Corinne M</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Brachytherapy</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Pavamani, Simon</au><au>D’Souza, David P</au><au>Portelance, Lorraine</au><au>Craighead, Peter S</au><au>Pearce, Andrew G</au><au>Traptow, Laurel L</au><au>Doll, Corinne M</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Image-guided brachytherapy for cervical cancer: A Canadian Brachytherapy Group survey</atitle><jtitle>Brachytherapy</jtitle><addtitle>Brachytherapy</addtitle><date>2011-09-01</date><risdate>2011</risdate><volume>10</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>345</spage><epage>351</epage><pages>345-351</pages><issn>1538-4721</issn><eissn>1873-1449</eissn><abstract>Abstract Purpose To survey the current use and future plans for image-guided brachytherapy (BT) for cervical cancer by radiation oncologists in Canada. Methods and Materials Canadian radiation oncologists treating gynecologic malignancies were identified in January 2009. A 29-item questionnaire (English and French) querying the current practice in the use of imaging in BT planning, and plans for transition to three-dimensional (3D) image guidance for BT for cervical cancer (curative intent, intact cervix), was electronically circulated. Questionnaire responses were tabulated and analyzed by respondent and by center. Results Response rate was 62% (36 of 58 radiation oncologists), representing 71% (22 of 31) of Canadian radiation oncology centers with a gynecologic BT facility. Most of the centers were using high-dose-rate BT (68%), followed by low-dose-rate BT (23%) and pulsed dose-rate BT (10%). Main imaging used for treatment planning by center was plain X-ray (50%), computerized tomography (CT) (45%), and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) (5%). For respondents using CT or MRI for planning, point A was the most common dose prescription point (50%), followed by gross tumor volume/clinical target volume as per Groupe Européen de Curiethérapie and the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology guidelines (44%). For centers using plain X-rays for planning, 73% planned to transition to a 3D image-based approach, with the majority to adopt CT imaging. Eighty percent of respondents agreed that 3D image-guided BT should become standard of care for treatment of cervical cancer in Canada, and additionally support the development of national guidelines. Conclusions Most of the Canadian radiation oncologists surveyed and Canadian cancer centers are either using 3D imaging and planning or transitioning to a 3D image-based approach within the next year. Point A remained a commonly documented prescription point. Access to MRI was very low. These results may lead to national treatment guidelines.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>21345744</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.brachy.2010.12.004</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1538-4721
ispartof Brachytherapy, 2011-09, Vol.10 (5), p.345-351
issn 1538-4721
1873-1449
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_887939153
source MEDLINE; Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)
subjects Brachytherapy - methods
Canada
Cervical cancer
Female
Hematology, Oncology and Palliative Medicine
Humans
Image-guided brachytherapy
Imaging, Three-Dimensional
Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Pattern of practice
Practice Patterns, Physicians
Prostheses and Implants
Radiology
Radiotherapy Dosage
Radiotherapy, Image-Guided
Tomography, X-Ray Computed
Uterine Cervical Neoplasms - radiotherapy
title Image-guided brachytherapy for cervical cancer: A Canadian Brachytherapy Group survey
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-22T05%3A03%3A09IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Image-guided%20brachytherapy%20for%20cervical%20cancer:%20A%20Canadian%20Brachytherapy%20Group%20survey&rft.jtitle=Brachytherapy&rft.au=Pavamani,%20Simon&rft.date=2011-09-01&rft.volume=10&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=345&rft.epage=351&rft.pages=345-351&rft.issn=1538-4721&rft.eissn=1873-1449&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.brachy.2010.12.004&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E887939153%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=887939153&rft_id=info:pmid/21345744&rft_els_id=S1538472110003867&rfr_iscdi=true