Dynamic tuning of human withdrawal reflex receptive fields during cognitive attention and distraction tasks

Abstract Objectives The aim of the present study was to investigate supraspinal modulation of human lower limb reflex receptive fields (RRFs) on the plantar side of the foot during cognitive tasks either distracting the subjects or actively directing their attention to the electrical stimuli directe...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:European journal of pain 2011-09, Vol.15 (8), p.816-821
Hauptverfasser: Bjerre, L, Andersen, A.T, Hagelskjær, M.T, Ge, N, Mørch, C.D, Andersen, O.K
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 821
container_issue 8
container_start_page 816
container_title European journal of pain
container_volume 15
creator Bjerre, L
Andersen, A.T
Hagelskjær, M.T
Ge, N
Mørch, C.D
Andersen, O.K
description Abstract Objectives The aim of the present study was to investigate supraspinal modulation of human lower limb reflex receptive fields (RRFs) on the plantar side of the foot during cognitive tasks either distracting the subjects or actively directing their attention to the electrical stimuli directed to the sole of the foot. Methods Twelve healthy volunteers participated. Nociceptive withdrawal reflexes (NWRs) were recorded in the ankle flexor tibialis anterior. The RRF was acquired by randomized activation of ten stimulation sites on the sole of the foot. The RRF was assessed during baseline, distraction, and attention in randomized order. Distraction was induced by the Stroop test, while attention was induced by requiring the subjects to localize the site of the stimulation and thereby forcing them to focus on the sole of the foot. Results The area of the RRF was significantly enlarged during the distraction task compared to baseline ( P < 0.05), whereas the RRF area was significantly reduced during the attention task compared to baseline ( P < 0.05). Conclusion The size of the RRF area was modulated by the cognitive state demonstrating a link between the cognitive activity and the descending control on spinal withdrawal reflex pathways.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.ejpain.2011.01.015
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_887757901</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S1090380111000322</els_id><sourcerecordid>887757901</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5046-d52518df97463e808c0f0b4031efd7c4a52e692b59846b724b42bc50edd236cb3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkk1v1DAQhiNERUvhHyCUG6cs_nZyQULbL6qKDwGCm-XYk9bZxFnspNv99zhN6YELSCONbb3PWPPOZNkrjFYYYfG2XUG71c6vCMJ4hebgT7IjzCkpCGbV03RGFSpoifBh9jzGFiHEJKLPskOCqRSCiaNsc7L3uncmHyfv_HU-NPnN1Guf79x4Y4Pe6S4P0HRwl5KB7ehuIW8cdDbmdgozYoZr7-7f9TiCH93gc-1tbl0cgzb391HHTXyRHTS6i_DyIR9n389Ov60viqtP5x_W768KwxETheWE49I2lWSCQolKgxpUM0QxNFYapjkBUZGaVyUTtSSsZqROKFhLqDA1Pc7eLHW3Yfg1QRxV76KBrtMehimqspSSywrhpGSL0oQhxtSn2gbX67BXGKnZZdWqxWU1u6zQHDxhrx8-mOoe7CP0x9YkqBbBznWw_6-i6vTyM63ozBYLm-yDu0dWh40Skkqufnw8VxjjNf1ycaZ-Jv27RQ_J0lsHQUXjwBuwLk1sVHZw_-rm7wKmc94Z3W1gD7EdpuDTuBRWkSikvs5bNS8VxmmhKCH0N6YtxwA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>887757901</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Dynamic tuning of human withdrawal reflex receptive fields during cognitive attention and distraction tasks</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Bjerre, L ; Andersen, A.T ; Hagelskjær, M.T ; Ge, N ; Mørch, C.D ; Andersen, O.K</creator><creatorcontrib>Bjerre, L ; Andersen, A.T ; Hagelskjær, M.T ; Ge, N ; Mørch, C.D ; Andersen, O.K</creatorcontrib><description>Abstract Objectives The aim of the present study was to investigate supraspinal modulation of human lower limb reflex receptive fields (RRFs) on the plantar side of the foot during cognitive tasks either distracting the subjects or actively directing their attention to the electrical stimuli directed to the sole of the foot. Methods Twelve healthy volunteers participated. Nociceptive withdrawal reflexes (NWRs) were recorded in the ankle flexor tibialis anterior. The RRF was acquired by randomized activation of ten stimulation sites on the sole of the foot. The RRF was assessed during baseline, distraction, and attention in randomized order. Distraction was induced by the Stroop test, while attention was induced by requiring the subjects to localize the site of the stimulation and thereby forcing them to focus on the sole of the foot. Results The area of the RRF was significantly enlarged during the distraction task compared to baseline ( P &lt; 0.05), whereas the RRF area was significantly reduced during the attention task compared to baseline ( P &lt; 0.05). Conclusion The size of the RRF area was modulated by the cognitive state demonstrating a link between the cognitive activity and the descending control on spinal withdrawal reflex pathways.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1090-3801</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1532-2149</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.ejpain.2011.01.015</identifier><identifier>PMID: 21376646</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford, UK: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Adult ; Anesthesia &amp; Perioperative Care ; Attention ; Attention - physiology ; Cognition - physiology ; Distraction ; Dynamical tuning ; Efferent Pathways - physiology ; Female ; Human ; Humans ; Male ; Nociceptive withdrawal reflex ; Pain - physiopathology ; Pain - psychology ; Pain Medicine ; Perceptual Masking - physiology ; Reflex - physiology ; Reflex receptive fields ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>European journal of pain, 2011-09, Vol.15 (8), p.816-821</ispartof><rights>European Federation of International Association for the Study of Pain Chapters</rights><rights>2011 European Federation of International Association for the Study of Pain Chapters</rights><rights>2011 European Federation of Chapters of the International Association for the Study of Pain</rights><rights>Copyright © 2011 European Federation of International Association for the Study of Pain Chapters. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5046-d52518df97463e808c0f0b4031efd7c4a52e692b59846b724b42bc50edd236cb3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5046-d52518df97463e808c0f0b4031efd7c4a52e692b59846b724b42bc50edd236cb3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1016%2Fj.ejpain.2011.01.015$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1016%2Fj.ejpain.2011.01.015$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27903,27904,45553,45554</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21376646$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Bjerre, L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Andersen, A.T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hagelskjær, M.T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ge, N</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mørch, C.D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Andersen, O.K</creatorcontrib><title>Dynamic tuning of human withdrawal reflex receptive fields during cognitive attention and distraction tasks</title><title>European journal of pain</title><addtitle>Eur J Pain</addtitle><description>Abstract Objectives The aim of the present study was to investigate supraspinal modulation of human lower limb reflex receptive fields (RRFs) on the plantar side of the foot during cognitive tasks either distracting the subjects or actively directing their attention to the electrical stimuli directed to the sole of the foot. Methods Twelve healthy volunteers participated. Nociceptive withdrawal reflexes (NWRs) were recorded in the ankle flexor tibialis anterior. The RRF was acquired by randomized activation of ten stimulation sites on the sole of the foot. The RRF was assessed during baseline, distraction, and attention in randomized order. Distraction was induced by the Stroop test, while attention was induced by requiring the subjects to localize the site of the stimulation and thereby forcing them to focus on the sole of the foot. Results The area of the RRF was significantly enlarged during the distraction task compared to baseline ( P &lt; 0.05), whereas the RRF area was significantly reduced during the attention task compared to baseline ( P &lt; 0.05). Conclusion The size of the RRF area was modulated by the cognitive state demonstrating a link between the cognitive activity and the descending control on spinal withdrawal reflex pathways.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Anesthesia &amp; Perioperative Care</subject><subject>Attention</subject><subject>Attention - physiology</subject><subject>Cognition - physiology</subject><subject>Distraction</subject><subject>Dynamical tuning</subject><subject>Efferent Pathways - physiology</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Human</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Nociceptive withdrawal reflex</subject><subject>Pain - physiopathology</subject><subject>Pain - psychology</subject><subject>Pain Medicine</subject><subject>Perceptual Masking - physiology</subject><subject>Reflex - physiology</subject><subject>Reflex receptive fields</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>1090-3801</issn><issn>1532-2149</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2011</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkk1v1DAQhiNERUvhHyCUG6cs_nZyQULbL6qKDwGCm-XYk9bZxFnspNv99zhN6YELSCONbb3PWPPOZNkrjFYYYfG2XUG71c6vCMJ4hebgT7IjzCkpCGbV03RGFSpoifBh9jzGFiHEJKLPskOCqRSCiaNsc7L3uncmHyfv_HU-NPnN1Guf79x4Y4Pe6S4P0HRwl5KB7ehuIW8cdDbmdgozYoZr7-7f9TiCH93gc-1tbl0cgzb391HHTXyRHTS6i_DyIR9n389Ov60viqtP5x_W768KwxETheWE49I2lWSCQolKgxpUM0QxNFYapjkBUZGaVyUTtSSsZqROKFhLqDA1Pc7eLHW3Yfg1QRxV76KBrtMehimqspSSywrhpGSL0oQhxtSn2gbX67BXGKnZZdWqxWU1u6zQHDxhrx8-mOoe7CP0x9YkqBbBznWw_6-i6vTyM63ozBYLm-yDu0dWh40Skkqufnw8VxjjNf1ycaZ-Jv27RQ_J0lsHQUXjwBuwLk1sVHZw_-rm7wKmc94Z3W1gD7EdpuDTuBRWkSikvs5bNS8VxmmhKCH0N6YtxwA</recordid><startdate>201109</startdate><enddate>201109</enddate><creator>Bjerre, L</creator><creator>Andersen, A.T</creator><creator>Hagelskjær, M.T</creator><creator>Ge, N</creator><creator>Mørch, C.D</creator><creator>Andersen, O.K</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201109</creationdate><title>Dynamic tuning of human withdrawal reflex receptive fields during cognitive attention and distraction tasks</title><author>Bjerre, L ; Andersen, A.T ; Hagelskjær, M.T ; Ge, N ; Mørch, C.D ; Andersen, O.K</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5046-d52518df97463e808c0f0b4031efd7c4a52e692b59846b724b42bc50edd236cb3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2011</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Anesthesia &amp; Perioperative Care</topic><topic>Attention</topic><topic>Attention - physiology</topic><topic>Cognition - physiology</topic><topic>Distraction</topic><topic>Dynamical tuning</topic><topic>Efferent Pathways - physiology</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Human</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Nociceptive withdrawal reflex</topic><topic>Pain - physiopathology</topic><topic>Pain - psychology</topic><topic>Pain Medicine</topic><topic>Perceptual Masking - physiology</topic><topic>Reflex - physiology</topic><topic>Reflex receptive fields</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Bjerre, L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Andersen, A.T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hagelskjær, M.T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ge, N</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mørch, C.D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Andersen, O.K</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>European journal of pain</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Bjerre, L</au><au>Andersen, A.T</au><au>Hagelskjær, M.T</au><au>Ge, N</au><au>Mørch, C.D</au><au>Andersen, O.K</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Dynamic tuning of human withdrawal reflex receptive fields during cognitive attention and distraction tasks</atitle><jtitle>European journal of pain</jtitle><addtitle>Eur J Pain</addtitle><date>2011-09</date><risdate>2011</risdate><volume>15</volume><issue>8</issue><spage>816</spage><epage>821</epage><pages>816-821</pages><issn>1090-3801</issn><eissn>1532-2149</eissn><abstract>Abstract Objectives The aim of the present study was to investigate supraspinal modulation of human lower limb reflex receptive fields (RRFs) on the plantar side of the foot during cognitive tasks either distracting the subjects or actively directing their attention to the electrical stimuli directed to the sole of the foot. Methods Twelve healthy volunteers participated. Nociceptive withdrawal reflexes (NWRs) were recorded in the ankle flexor tibialis anterior. The RRF was acquired by randomized activation of ten stimulation sites on the sole of the foot. The RRF was assessed during baseline, distraction, and attention in randomized order. Distraction was induced by the Stroop test, while attention was induced by requiring the subjects to localize the site of the stimulation and thereby forcing them to focus on the sole of the foot. Results The area of the RRF was significantly enlarged during the distraction task compared to baseline ( P &lt; 0.05), whereas the RRF area was significantly reduced during the attention task compared to baseline ( P &lt; 0.05). Conclusion The size of the RRF area was modulated by the cognitive state demonstrating a link between the cognitive activity and the descending control on spinal withdrawal reflex pathways.</abstract><cop>Oxford, UK</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>21376646</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.ejpain.2011.01.015</doi><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1090-3801
ispartof European journal of pain, 2011-09, Vol.15 (8), p.816-821
issn 1090-3801
1532-2149
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_887757901
source MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete
subjects Adult
Anesthesia & Perioperative Care
Attention
Attention - physiology
Cognition - physiology
Distraction
Dynamical tuning
Efferent Pathways - physiology
Female
Human
Humans
Male
Nociceptive withdrawal reflex
Pain - physiopathology
Pain - psychology
Pain Medicine
Perceptual Masking - physiology
Reflex - physiology
Reflex receptive fields
Young Adult
title Dynamic tuning of human withdrawal reflex receptive fields during cognitive attention and distraction tasks
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-22T01%3A42%3A08IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Dynamic%20tuning%20of%20human%20withdrawal%20reflex%20receptive%20fields%20during%20cognitive%20attention%20and%20distraction%20tasks&rft.jtitle=European%20journal%20of%20pain&rft.au=Bjerre,%20L&rft.date=2011-09&rft.volume=15&rft.issue=8&rft.spage=816&rft.epage=821&rft.pages=816-821&rft.issn=1090-3801&rft.eissn=1532-2149&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.ejpain.2011.01.015&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E887757901%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=887757901&rft_id=info:pmid/21376646&rft_els_id=S1090380111000322&rfr_iscdi=true