Enhancing the Algorithm for Developmental–Behavioral Surveillance and Screening in Children 0 to 5 Years
Objective: To determine if the 2006 American Academy of Pediatrics developmental surveillance and screening algorithm is adequate or if revisions are needed. Methods: A comprehensive literature search was conducted to investigate a clinician’s ability to perform developmental—behavioral surveillance...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Clinical pediatrics 2011-09, Vol.50 (9), p.853-868 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 868 |
---|---|
container_issue | 9 |
container_start_page | 853 |
container_title | Clinical pediatrics |
container_volume | 50 |
creator | Marks, Kevin P. Page Glascoe, Frances Macias, Michelle M. |
description | Objective: To determine if the 2006 American Academy of Pediatrics developmental surveillance and screening algorithm is adequate or if revisions are needed. Methods: A comprehensive literature search was conducted to investigate a clinician’s ability to perform developmental—behavioral surveillance in children 0 to 5 years. Results: Even when a broad-band developmental screen is typical, pediatricians should refer when they confidently suspect a delay but be far more suspicious about children who seem asymptomatic. Periodic screening enhances surveillance by improving early detection and early intervention (EI) eligibility rates. Nevertheless, children with concerning screens are not consistently referred and interlinked to EI. Once referred, approximately half are deemed EI-ineligible, even though they typically perform well below average and have numerous, predictive academic and psychosocial risk factors. Meanwhile, clinicians struggle with tracking at-risk children. Conclusion: Revisions are needed to optimize early detection, prevention, and monitoring. Greater emphasis is needed on developmental—behavioral promotion and referral care coordination. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1177/0009922811406263 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_887504700</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1177_0009922811406263</sage_id><sourcerecordid>1928616223</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c364t-6b7ab7eafc1451bd7c4ed9c5350a7fecc939cc1ccb50ff950d5833d1fff1897a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kUFv1DAQha0KRJfCvafKEoeeAmM7juNju20BqRKHwoFT5DjjTVaJvbWTlXrrf-Af8ktItKVClTjN4X3vzdMMIacMPjKm1CcA0JrzkrEcCl6II7JiWpQZV6BekdUiZ4t-TN6mtAVgAqR4Q445kzlwVa7I9tq3xtvOb-jYIr3oNyF2YztQFyK9wj32YTegH03_-_HXJbZm34Voeno3xT12fT97kRrf0DsbEf2S03m6bru-iegp0DFQSX-iiekdee1Mn_D90zwhP26uv6-_ZLffPn9dX9xmVhT5mBW1MrVC4yzLJasbZXNstJVCglEOrdVCW8usrSU4pyU0shSiYc45VmplxAk5P-TuYrifMI3V0CWLS1cMU6rKUknIFcBMfnhBbsMU_VyuYpqXBSs4FzMFB8rGkFJEV-1iN5j4UDGoljdUL98wW86egqd6wObZ8PfuM5AdgGQ2-M_W_wX-AW_ckGc</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1928616223</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Enhancing the Algorithm for Developmental–Behavioral Surveillance and Screening in Children 0 to 5 Years</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>SAGE Complete A-Z List</source><creator>Marks, Kevin P. ; Page Glascoe, Frances ; Macias, Michelle M.</creator><creatorcontrib>Marks, Kevin P. ; Page Glascoe, Frances ; Macias, Michelle M.</creatorcontrib><description>Objective: To determine if the 2006 American Academy of Pediatrics developmental surveillance and screening algorithm is adequate or if revisions are needed. Methods: A comprehensive literature search was conducted to investigate a clinician’s ability to perform developmental—behavioral surveillance in children 0 to 5 years. Results: Even when a broad-band developmental screen is typical, pediatricians should refer when they confidently suspect a delay but be far more suspicious about children who seem asymptomatic. Periodic screening enhances surveillance by improving early detection and early intervention (EI) eligibility rates. Nevertheless, children with concerning screens are not consistently referred and interlinked to EI. Once referred, approximately half are deemed EI-ineligible, even though they typically perform well below average and have numerous, predictive academic and psychosocial risk factors. Meanwhile, clinicians struggle with tracking at-risk children. Conclusion: Revisions are needed to optimize early detection, prevention, and monitoring. Greater emphasis is needed on developmental—behavioral promotion and referral care coordination.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0009-9228</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1938-2707</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/0009922811406263</identifier><identifier>PMID: 21540278</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>Algorithms ; Canada ; Child Behavior Disorders - diagnosis ; Child Behavior Disorders - prevention & control ; Child, Preschool ; Children ; Developmental Disabilities - diagnosis ; Developmental Disabilities - prevention & control ; Early Diagnosis ; Humans ; Infant ; Infant, Newborn ; Mass Screening - methods ; Medical screening ; Pediatrics ; Practice Guidelines as Topic ; Promotion ; Risk factors ; Societies, Medical ; Surveillance ; United States</subject><ispartof>Clinical pediatrics, 2011-09, Vol.50 (9), p.853-868</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2011</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c364t-6b7ab7eafc1451bd7c4ed9c5350a7fecc939cc1ccb50ff950d5833d1fff1897a3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c364t-6b7ab7eafc1451bd7c4ed9c5350a7fecc939cc1ccb50ff950d5833d1fff1897a3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/0009922811406263$$EPDF$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0009922811406263$$EHTML$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,21800,27905,27906,43602,43603</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21540278$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Marks, Kevin P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Page Glascoe, Frances</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Macias, Michelle M.</creatorcontrib><title>Enhancing the Algorithm for Developmental–Behavioral Surveillance and Screening in Children 0 to 5 Years</title><title>Clinical pediatrics</title><addtitle>Clin Pediatr (Phila)</addtitle><description>Objective: To determine if the 2006 American Academy of Pediatrics developmental surveillance and screening algorithm is adequate or if revisions are needed. Methods: A comprehensive literature search was conducted to investigate a clinician’s ability to perform developmental—behavioral surveillance in children 0 to 5 years. Results: Even when a broad-band developmental screen is typical, pediatricians should refer when they confidently suspect a delay but be far more suspicious about children who seem asymptomatic. Periodic screening enhances surveillance by improving early detection and early intervention (EI) eligibility rates. Nevertheless, children with concerning screens are not consistently referred and interlinked to EI. Once referred, approximately half are deemed EI-ineligible, even though they typically perform well below average and have numerous, predictive academic and psychosocial risk factors. Meanwhile, clinicians struggle with tracking at-risk children. Conclusion: Revisions are needed to optimize early detection, prevention, and monitoring. Greater emphasis is needed on developmental—behavioral promotion and referral care coordination.</description><subject>Algorithms</subject><subject>Canada</subject><subject>Child Behavior Disorders - diagnosis</subject><subject>Child Behavior Disorders - prevention & control</subject><subject>Child, Preschool</subject><subject>Children</subject><subject>Developmental Disabilities - diagnosis</subject><subject>Developmental Disabilities - prevention & control</subject><subject>Early Diagnosis</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Infant</subject><subject>Infant, Newborn</subject><subject>Mass Screening - methods</subject><subject>Medical screening</subject><subject>Pediatrics</subject><subject>Practice Guidelines as Topic</subject><subject>Promotion</subject><subject>Risk factors</subject><subject>Societies, Medical</subject><subject>Surveillance</subject><subject>United States</subject><issn>0009-9228</issn><issn>1938-2707</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2011</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kUFv1DAQha0KRJfCvafKEoeeAmM7juNju20BqRKHwoFT5DjjTVaJvbWTlXrrf-Af8ktItKVClTjN4X3vzdMMIacMPjKm1CcA0JrzkrEcCl6II7JiWpQZV6BekdUiZ4t-TN6mtAVgAqR4Q445kzlwVa7I9tq3xtvOb-jYIr3oNyF2YztQFyK9wj32YTegH03_-_HXJbZm34Voeno3xT12fT97kRrf0DsbEf2S03m6bru-iegp0DFQSX-iiekdee1Mn_D90zwhP26uv6-_ZLffPn9dX9xmVhT5mBW1MrVC4yzLJasbZXNstJVCglEOrdVCW8usrSU4pyU0shSiYc45VmplxAk5P-TuYrifMI3V0CWLS1cMU6rKUknIFcBMfnhBbsMU_VyuYpqXBSs4FzMFB8rGkFJEV-1iN5j4UDGoljdUL98wW86egqd6wObZ8PfuM5AdgGQ2-M_W_wX-AW_ckGc</recordid><startdate>201109</startdate><enddate>201109</enddate><creator>Marks, Kevin P.</creator><creator>Page Glascoe, Frances</creator><creator>Macias, Michelle M.</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><general>Westminster Publications, Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>7QR</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201109</creationdate><title>Enhancing the Algorithm for Developmental–Behavioral Surveillance and Screening in Children 0 to 5 Years</title><author>Marks, Kevin P. ; Page Glascoe, Frances ; Macias, Michelle M.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c364t-6b7ab7eafc1451bd7c4ed9c5350a7fecc939cc1ccb50ff950d5833d1fff1897a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2011</creationdate><topic>Algorithms</topic><topic>Canada</topic><topic>Child Behavior Disorders - diagnosis</topic><topic>Child Behavior Disorders - prevention & control</topic><topic>Child, Preschool</topic><topic>Children</topic><topic>Developmental Disabilities - diagnosis</topic><topic>Developmental Disabilities - prevention & control</topic><topic>Early Diagnosis</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Infant</topic><topic>Infant, Newborn</topic><topic>Mass Screening - methods</topic><topic>Medical screening</topic><topic>Pediatrics</topic><topic>Practice Guidelines as Topic</topic><topic>Promotion</topic><topic>Risk factors</topic><topic>Societies, Medical</topic><topic>Surveillance</topic><topic>United States</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Marks, Kevin P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Page Glascoe, Frances</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Macias, Michelle M.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Calcium & Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>Chemoreception Abstracts</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Clinical pediatrics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Marks, Kevin P.</au><au>Page Glascoe, Frances</au><au>Macias, Michelle M.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Enhancing the Algorithm for Developmental–Behavioral Surveillance and Screening in Children 0 to 5 Years</atitle><jtitle>Clinical pediatrics</jtitle><addtitle>Clin Pediatr (Phila)</addtitle><date>2011-09</date><risdate>2011</risdate><volume>50</volume><issue>9</issue><spage>853</spage><epage>868</epage><pages>853-868</pages><issn>0009-9228</issn><eissn>1938-2707</eissn><abstract>Objective: To determine if the 2006 American Academy of Pediatrics developmental surveillance and screening algorithm is adequate or if revisions are needed. Methods: A comprehensive literature search was conducted to investigate a clinician’s ability to perform developmental—behavioral surveillance in children 0 to 5 years. Results: Even when a broad-band developmental screen is typical, pediatricians should refer when they confidently suspect a delay but be far more suspicious about children who seem asymptomatic. Periodic screening enhances surveillance by improving early detection and early intervention (EI) eligibility rates. Nevertheless, children with concerning screens are not consistently referred and interlinked to EI. Once referred, approximately half are deemed EI-ineligible, even though they typically perform well below average and have numerous, predictive academic and psychosocial risk factors. Meanwhile, clinicians struggle with tracking at-risk children. Conclusion: Revisions are needed to optimize early detection, prevention, and monitoring. Greater emphasis is needed on developmental—behavioral promotion and referral care coordination.</abstract><cop>Los Angeles, CA</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><pmid>21540278</pmid><doi>10.1177/0009922811406263</doi><tpages>16</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0009-9228 |
ispartof | Clinical pediatrics, 2011-09, Vol.50 (9), p.853-868 |
issn | 0009-9228 1938-2707 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_887504700 |
source | MEDLINE; SAGE Complete A-Z List |
subjects | Algorithms Canada Child Behavior Disorders - diagnosis Child Behavior Disorders - prevention & control Child, Preschool Children Developmental Disabilities - diagnosis Developmental Disabilities - prevention & control Early Diagnosis Humans Infant Infant, Newborn Mass Screening - methods Medical screening Pediatrics Practice Guidelines as Topic Promotion Risk factors Societies, Medical Surveillance United States |
title | Enhancing the Algorithm for Developmental–Behavioral Surveillance and Screening in Children 0 to 5 Years |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-19T01%3A29%3A16IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Enhancing%20the%20Algorithm%20for%20Developmental%E2%80%93Behavioral%20Surveillance%20and%20Screening%20in%20Children%200%20to%205%20Years&rft.jtitle=Clinical%20pediatrics&rft.au=Marks,%20Kevin%20P.&rft.date=2011-09&rft.volume=50&rft.issue=9&rft.spage=853&rft.epage=868&rft.pages=853-868&rft.issn=0009-9228&rft.eissn=1938-2707&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/0009922811406263&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1928616223%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1928616223&rft_id=info:pmid/21540278&rft_sage_id=10.1177_0009922811406263&rfr_iscdi=true |