Skeletal differences at the ulna and radius between pre-pubertal non-elite female gymnasts and non-gymnasts

To compare skeletal parameters between the ulna and radius in pre-pubertal non-elite gymnasts and non-gymnasts. Fifty-eight non-elite artistic gymnasts, aged 6-11 years, were compared with 28 non-gymnasts for bone mineral content (BMC), total and cortical bone area (ToA, CoA), trabecular and cortica...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of musculoskeletal & neuronal interactions 2011-09, Vol.11 (3), p.227-233
Hauptverfasser: Burt, L A, Naughton, G A, Greene, D A, Ducher, G
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 233
container_issue 3
container_start_page 227
container_title Journal of musculoskeletal & neuronal interactions
container_volume 11
creator Burt, L A
Naughton, G A
Greene, D A
Ducher, G
description To compare skeletal parameters between the ulna and radius in pre-pubertal non-elite gymnasts and non-gymnasts. Fifty-eight non-elite artistic gymnasts, aged 6-11 years, were compared with 28 non-gymnasts for bone mineral content (BMC), total and cortical bone area (ToA, CoA), trabecular and cortical volumetric density (TrD, CoD) and estimated bone strength (BSI and SSIp), obtained by pQCT at the distal and proximal forearm. Gymnasts had greater estimated bone strength than non-gymnasts at both sites of the forearm. At the distal forearm, the gymnastics-induced skeletal benefits were greater at the radius than ulna (Z-scores for BMC, TrD and BSI +0.40 to +0.61 SD, p
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_887502073</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>887502073</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-p210t-dba83c8a9a22c07ea4f93af48f627cfbfe11d8030df85f103cef9b86013218e43</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo1UMlOwzAU9AFES-EXkG-cInnJ4hxRxSZV4gCco2f7GUIdJ9iOUP-eFtrTSLNJM2dkyTlTRcNrviCXKX0xJngp2AVZCK5UpdpmSbavW_SYwVPbO4cRg8FEIdP8iXT2ASgESyPYfk5UY_5BDHSKWEyzxnjIhTEU6PuM1OEAHunHbgiQcvpLHtQTcUXOHfiE10dckfeH-7f1U7F5eXxe322KSXCWC6tBSaOgBSEMaxBK10pwpXK1aIzTDjm3iklmnaocZ9Kga7WqGZf7XVjKFbn9753i-D1jyt3QJ4PeQ8BxTp1STcUEa-TeeXN0znpA202xHyDuutM_8hcL8mKK</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>887502073</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Skeletal differences at the ulna and radius between pre-pubertal non-elite female gymnasts and non-gymnasts</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><creator>Burt, L A ; Naughton, G A ; Greene, D A ; Ducher, G</creator><creatorcontrib>Burt, L A ; Naughton, G A ; Greene, D A ; Ducher, G</creatorcontrib><description>To compare skeletal parameters between the ulna and radius in pre-pubertal non-elite gymnasts and non-gymnasts. Fifty-eight non-elite artistic gymnasts, aged 6-11 years, were compared with 28 non-gymnasts for bone mineral content (BMC), total and cortical bone area (ToA, CoA), trabecular and cortical volumetric density (TrD, CoD) and estimated bone strength (BSI and SSIp), obtained by pQCT at the distal and proximal forearm. Gymnasts had greater estimated bone strength than non-gymnasts at both sites of the forearm. At the distal forearm, the gymnastics-induced skeletal benefits were greater at the radius than ulna (Z-scores for BMC, TrD and BSI +0.40 to +0.61 SD, p&lt;0.05 vs. +0.15 to +0.48 SD, NS). At the proximal forearm, the skeletal benefits were greater at the ulna than the radius (Z-scores for BMC, ToA, CoA and SSIp +0.59 to +0.82 SD, p&lt;0.01 vs. +0.35 (ToA) and +0.43 SD (SSIp), p&lt;0.01). Skeletal benefits at the distal and proximal forearm emerged in young non-elite gymnasts. Benefits were larger when considering skeletal parameters at both the ulna and radius, than the radius alone as traditionally performed with pQCT. These findings suggest the ulna is worth investigating in future studies aiming to accurately quantify exercise-induced skeletal adaptations.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1108-7161</identifier><identifier>PMID: 21885897</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Greece</publisher><subject>Bone Development - physiology ; Child ; Female ; Gymnastics - physiology ; Humans ; Physical Fitness - physiology ; Radiography ; Radius - anatomy &amp; histology ; Radius - diagnostic imaging ; Radius - growth &amp; development ; Ulna - anatomy &amp; histology ; Ulna - diagnostic imaging ; Ulna - growth &amp; development</subject><ispartof>Journal of musculoskeletal &amp; neuronal interactions, 2011-09, Vol.11 (3), p.227-233</ispartof><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21885897$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Burt, L A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Naughton, G A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Greene, D A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ducher, G</creatorcontrib><title>Skeletal differences at the ulna and radius between pre-pubertal non-elite female gymnasts and non-gymnasts</title><title>Journal of musculoskeletal &amp; neuronal interactions</title><addtitle>J Musculoskelet Neuronal Interact</addtitle><description>To compare skeletal parameters between the ulna and radius in pre-pubertal non-elite gymnasts and non-gymnasts. Fifty-eight non-elite artistic gymnasts, aged 6-11 years, were compared with 28 non-gymnasts for bone mineral content (BMC), total and cortical bone area (ToA, CoA), trabecular and cortical volumetric density (TrD, CoD) and estimated bone strength (BSI and SSIp), obtained by pQCT at the distal and proximal forearm. Gymnasts had greater estimated bone strength than non-gymnasts at both sites of the forearm. At the distal forearm, the gymnastics-induced skeletal benefits were greater at the radius than ulna (Z-scores for BMC, TrD and BSI +0.40 to +0.61 SD, p&lt;0.05 vs. +0.15 to +0.48 SD, NS). At the proximal forearm, the skeletal benefits were greater at the ulna than the radius (Z-scores for BMC, ToA, CoA and SSIp +0.59 to +0.82 SD, p&lt;0.01 vs. +0.35 (ToA) and +0.43 SD (SSIp), p&lt;0.01). Skeletal benefits at the distal and proximal forearm emerged in young non-elite gymnasts. Benefits were larger when considering skeletal parameters at both the ulna and radius, than the radius alone as traditionally performed with pQCT. These findings suggest the ulna is worth investigating in future studies aiming to accurately quantify exercise-induced skeletal adaptations.</description><subject>Bone Development - physiology</subject><subject>Child</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Gymnastics - physiology</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Physical Fitness - physiology</subject><subject>Radiography</subject><subject>Radius - anatomy &amp; histology</subject><subject>Radius - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Radius - growth &amp; development</subject><subject>Ulna - anatomy &amp; histology</subject><subject>Ulna - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Ulna - growth &amp; development</subject><issn>1108-7161</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2011</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNo1UMlOwzAU9AFES-EXkG-cInnJ4hxRxSZV4gCco2f7GUIdJ9iOUP-eFtrTSLNJM2dkyTlTRcNrviCXKX0xJngp2AVZCK5UpdpmSbavW_SYwVPbO4cRg8FEIdP8iXT2ASgESyPYfk5UY_5BDHSKWEyzxnjIhTEU6PuM1OEAHunHbgiQcvpLHtQTcUXOHfiE10dckfeH-7f1U7F5eXxe322KSXCWC6tBSaOgBSEMaxBK10pwpXK1aIzTDjm3iklmnaocZ9Kga7WqGZf7XVjKFbn9753i-D1jyt3QJ4PeQ8BxTp1STcUEa-TeeXN0znpA202xHyDuutM_8hcL8mKK</recordid><startdate>201109</startdate><enddate>201109</enddate><creator>Burt, L A</creator><creator>Naughton, G A</creator><creator>Greene, D A</creator><creator>Ducher, G</creator><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201109</creationdate><title>Skeletal differences at the ulna and radius between pre-pubertal non-elite female gymnasts and non-gymnasts</title><author>Burt, L A ; Naughton, G A ; Greene, D A ; Ducher, G</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-p210t-dba83c8a9a22c07ea4f93af48f627cfbfe11d8030df85f103cef9b86013218e43</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2011</creationdate><topic>Bone Development - physiology</topic><topic>Child</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Gymnastics - physiology</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Physical Fitness - physiology</topic><topic>Radiography</topic><topic>Radius - anatomy &amp; histology</topic><topic>Radius - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Radius - growth &amp; development</topic><topic>Ulna - anatomy &amp; histology</topic><topic>Ulna - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Ulna - growth &amp; development</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Burt, L A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Naughton, G A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Greene, D A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ducher, G</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of musculoskeletal &amp; neuronal interactions</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Burt, L A</au><au>Naughton, G A</au><au>Greene, D A</au><au>Ducher, G</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Skeletal differences at the ulna and radius between pre-pubertal non-elite female gymnasts and non-gymnasts</atitle><jtitle>Journal of musculoskeletal &amp; neuronal interactions</jtitle><addtitle>J Musculoskelet Neuronal Interact</addtitle><date>2011-09</date><risdate>2011</risdate><volume>11</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>227</spage><epage>233</epage><pages>227-233</pages><issn>1108-7161</issn><abstract>To compare skeletal parameters between the ulna and radius in pre-pubertal non-elite gymnasts and non-gymnasts. Fifty-eight non-elite artistic gymnasts, aged 6-11 years, were compared with 28 non-gymnasts for bone mineral content (BMC), total and cortical bone area (ToA, CoA), trabecular and cortical volumetric density (TrD, CoD) and estimated bone strength (BSI and SSIp), obtained by pQCT at the distal and proximal forearm. Gymnasts had greater estimated bone strength than non-gymnasts at both sites of the forearm. At the distal forearm, the gymnastics-induced skeletal benefits were greater at the radius than ulna (Z-scores for BMC, TrD and BSI +0.40 to +0.61 SD, p&lt;0.05 vs. +0.15 to +0.48 SD, NS). At the proximal forearm, the skeletal benefits were greater at the ulna than the radius (Z-scores for BMC, ToA, CoA and SSIp +0.59 to +0.82 SD, p&lt;0.01 vs. +0.35 (ToA) and +0.43 SD (SSIp), p&lt;0.01). Skeletal benefits at the distal and proximal forearm emerged in young non-elite gymnasts. Benefits were larger when considering skeletal parameters at both the ulna and radius, than the radius alone as traditionally performed with pQCT. These findings suggest the ulna is worth investigating in future studies aiming to accurately quantify exercise-induced skeletal adaptations.</abstract><cop>Greece</cop><pmid>21885897</pmid><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1108-7161
ispartof Journal of musculoskeletal & neuronal interactions, 2011-09, Vol.11 (3), p.227-233
issn 1108-7161
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_887502073
source MEDLINE; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals
subjects Bone Development - physiology
Child
Female
Gymnastics - physiology
Humans
Physical Fitness - physiology
Radiography
Radius - anatomy & histology
Radius - diagnostic imaging
Radius - growth & development
Ulna - anatomy & histology
Ulna - diagnostic imaging
Ulna - growth & development
title Skeletal differences at the ulna and radius between pre-pubertal non-elite female gymnasts and non-gymnasts
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-30T16%3A28%3A20IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Skeletal%20differences%20at%20the%20ulna%20and%20radius%20between%20pre-pubertal%20non-elite%20female%20gymnasts%20and%20non-gymnasts&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20musculoskeletal%20&%20neuronal%20interactions&rft.au=Burt,%20L%20A&rft.date=2011-09&rft.volume=11&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=227&rft.epage=233&rft.pages=227-233&rft.issn=1108-7161&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E887502073%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=887502073&rft_id=info:pmid/21885897&rfr_iscdi=true