What do we know about French liaison today?

Sanford Schane's 1965 thesis inaugurated a long tradition of work wherein liaison is envisaged firstly as an essentially phonological question, secondly as the passive result of the non deletion of underlying segments, thirdly as easily explicable if the right theoretical tools are used (be the...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Langue française 2011-03, Vol.169 (Mar), p.103-135
Hauptverfasser: Durand, Jacques, Laks, Bernard, Calderone, Basilio, Tchobanov, Atanas
Format: Artikel
Sprache:fre
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 135
container_issue Mar
container_start_page 103
container_title Langue française
container_volume 169
creator Durand, Jacques
Laks, Bernard
Calderone, Basilio
Tchobanov, Atanas
description Sanford Schane's 1965 thesis inaugurated a long tradition of work wherein liaison is envisaged firstly as an essentially phonological question, secondly as the passive result of the non deletion of underlying segments, thirdly as easily explicable if the right theoretical tools are used (be they distinctive features, boundaries, rules or constraints). In this article, we present an alternative methodology for the study of liaison followed within the PFC programme (Phonologie du Francais Contemporain: usages, varietes et structure). We argue that a better empirical basis yields a different picture of liaison as a multifactorial and multilevel phenomenon highly sensitive to frequency effects. We present a number of results ranging from "enchainement" to the influence of sociostylistic factors such as age, education, gender or geographical location. Adapted from the source document
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_887494032</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>887494032</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-proquest_miscellaneous_8874940323</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpjYeA0MDAy1rUwNrPgYOAqLs4yMDAxtjAw52TQDs9ILFFIyVcoT1XIzssvV0hMyi8tUXArSs1LzlDIyUzMLM7PUyjJT0mstOdhYE1LzClO5YXS3Azqbq4hzh66BUX5haWpxSXxuZnFyak5OYl5qfmlxfEWFuYmliYGxkbGxKsEAGXKM8w</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>887494032</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>What do we know about French liaison today?</title><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><source>Cairn.info Revues - Général</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><source>Cairn.info Free Access Journals-Revues en accès libre</source><creator>Durand, Jacques ; Laks, Bernard ; Calderone, Basilio ; Tchobanov, Atanas</creator><creatorcontrib>Durand, Jacques ; Laks, Bernard ; Calderone, Basilio ; Tchobanov, Atanas</creatorcontrib><description>Sanford Schane's 1965 thesis inaugurated a long tradition of work wherein liaison is envisaged firstly as an essentially phonological question, secondly as the passive result of the non deletion of underlying segments, thirdly as easily explicable if the right theoretical tools are used (be they distinctive features, boundaries, rules or constraints). In this article, we present an alternative methodology for the study of liaison followed within the PFC programme (Phonologie du Francais Contemporain: usages, varietes et structure). We argue that a better empirical basis yields a different picture of liaison as a multifactorial and multilevel phenomenon highly sensitive to frequency effects. We present a number of results ranging from "enchainement" to the influence of sociostylistic factors such as age, education, gender or geographical location. Adapted from the source document</description><identifier>ISSN: 0023-8368</identifier><identifier>CODEN: LNGFAL</identifier><language>fre</language><ispartof>Langue française, 2011-03, Vol.169 (Mar), p.103-135</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Durand, Jacques</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Laks, Bernard</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Calderone, Basilio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tchobanov, Atanas</creatorcontrib><title>What do we know about French liaison today?</title><title>Langue française</title><description>Sanford Schane's 1965 thesis inaugurated a long tradition of work wherein liaison is envisaged firstly as an essentially phonological question, secondly as the passive result of the non deletion of underlying segments, thirdly as easily explicable if the right theoretical tools are used (be they distinctive features, boundaries, rules or constraints). In this article, we present an alternative methodology for the study of liaison followed within the PFC programme (Phonologie du Francais Contemporain: usages, varietes et structure). We argue that a better empirical basis yields a different picture of liaison as a multifactorial and multilevel phenomenon highly sensitive to frequency effects. We present a number of results ranging from "enchainement" to the influence of sociostylistic factors such as age, education, gender or geographical location. Adapted from the source document</description><issn>0023-8368</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2011</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpjYeA0MDAy1rUwNrPgYOAqLs4yMDAxtjAw52TQDs9ILFFIyVcoT1XIzssvV0hMyi8tUXArSs1LzlDIyUzMLM7PUyjJT0mstOdhYE1LzClO5YXS3Azqbq4hzh66BUX5haWpxSXxuZnFyak5OYl5qfmlxfEWFuYmliYGxkbGxKsEAGXKM8w</recordid><startdate>20110301</startdate><enddate>20110301</enddate><creator>Durand, Jacques</creator><creator>Laks, Bernard</creator><creator>Calderone, Basilio</creator><creator>Tchobanov, Atanas</creator><scope>7T9</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20110301</creationdate><title>What do we know about French liaison today?</title><author>Durand, Jacques ; Laks, Bernard ; Calderone, Basilio ; Tchobanov, Atanas</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-proquest_miscellaneous_8874940323</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>fre</language><creationdate>2011</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Durand, Jacques</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Laks, Bernard</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Calderone, Basilio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tchobanov, Atanas</creatorcontrib><collection>Linguistics and Language Behavior Abstracts (LLBA)</collection><jtitle>Langue française</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Durand, Jacques</au><au>Laks, Bernard</au><au>Calderone, Basilio</au><au>Tchobanov, Atanas</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>What do we know about French liaison today?</atitle><jtitle>Langue française</jtitle><date>2011-03-01</date><risdate>2011</risdate><volume>169</volume><issue>Mar</issue><spage>103</spage><epage>135</epage><pages>103-135</pages><issn>0023-8368</issn><coden>LNGFAL</coden><abstract>Sanford Schane's 1965 thesis inaugurated a long tradition of work wherein liaison is envisaged firstly as an essentially phonological question, secondly as the passive result of the non deletion of underlying segments, thirdly as easily explicable if the right theoretical tools are used (be they distinctive features, boundaries, rules or constraints). In this article, we present an alternative methodology for the study of liaison followed within the PFC programme (Phonologie du Francais Contemporain: usages, varietes et structure). We argue that a better empirical basis yields a different picture of liaison as a multifactorial and multilevel phenomenon highly sensitive to frequency effects. We present a number of results ranging from "enchainement" to the influence of sociostylistic factors such as age, education, gender or geographical location. Adapted from the source document</abstract></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0023-8368
ispartof Langue française, 2011-03, Vol.169 (Mar), p.103-135
issn 0023-8368
language fre
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_887494032
source Jstor Complete Legacy; Cairn.info Revues - Général; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; Alma/SFX Local Collection; Cairn.info Free Access Journals-Revues en accès libre
title What do we know about French liaison today?
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-06T00%3A00%3A25IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=What%20do%20we%20know%20about%20French%20liaison%20today?&rft.jtitle=Langue%20fran%C3%A7aise&rft.au=Durand,%20Jacques&rft.date=2011-03-01&rft.volume=169&rft.issue=Mar&rft.spage=103&rft.epage=135&rft.pages=103-135&rft.issn=0023-8368&rft.coden=LNGFAL&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cproquest%3E887494032%3C/proquest%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=887494032&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true