Is there an influence of body mass on digesta mean retention time in herbivores? A comparative study on ungulates

The relation between body mass (BM) and digesta mean retention time (MRT) in herbivores was the focus of several studies in recent years. It was assumed that MRT scaled with BM 0.25 based on the isometric scaling of gut capacity (BM 1.0) and allometric scaling of energy intake (BM 0.75). Literature...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Comparative biochemistry and physiology. Part A, Molecular & integrative physiology Molecular & integrative physiology, 2011-11, Vol.160 (3), p.355-364
Hauptverfasser: Steuer, Patrick, Südekum, Karl-Heinz, Müller, Dennis W.H., Franz, Ragna, Kaandorp, Jacques, Clauss, Marcus, Hummel, Jürgen
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 364
container_issue 3
container_start_page 355
container_title Comparative biochemistry and physiology. Part A, Molecular & integrative physiology
container_volume 160
creator Steuer, Patrick
Südekum, Karl-Heinz
Müller, Dennis W.H.
Franz, Ragna
Kaandorp, Jacques
Clauss, Marcus
Hummel, Jürgen
description The relation between body mass (BM) and digesta mean retention time (MRT) in herbivores was the focus of several studies in recent years. It was assumed that MRT scaled with BM 0.25 based on the isometric scaling of gut capacity (BM 1.0) and allometric scaling of energy intake (BM 0.75). Literature studies that tested this hypothesis produced conflicting results, arriving sometimes at higher or lower exponents than the postulated 0.25. This study was conducted with 8 ruminants ( n = 2–6 per species) and 6 hindgut fermenting species/breeds ( n = 2–6, warthog n = 1) with a BM range of 60–4000 kg. All animals received a ration of 100% grass hay with ad libitum access. Dry matter intake was measured and the MRT was estimated by the use of a solute and a particle (1–2 mm) marker. No significant scaling of MRT particle with BM was observed for all herbivores (32 BM 0.04, p = 0.518) and hindgut fermenters (32 BM 0.00, p = 1.00). The scaling exponent for ruminants only showed a tendency towards significance (29 BM 0.12, p = 0.071). Ruminants on average had an MRT particle 1.61-fold longer than hindgut fermenters. Whereas an exponent of 0.25 is reasonable from theoretical considerations, much lower exponents were found in this and other studies. The energetic benefit of increasing MRT is by no means continuous, since the energy released from a given food unit via digestion decreases over time. The low and non-significant scaling factors for both digestion types suggest that in ungulates, MRT is less influenced by BM (maximal allometric exponent ≤ 0.1) than often reported.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.cbpa.2011.07.005
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_885911189</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S109564331100208X</els_id><sourcerecordid>885911189</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c399t-11c9fafd8742dfc111429795f76e064ff7a226bc69f13e97632991c461e39f7c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kM1q3DAUhUVpaH7aF-iiaJeVHV3ZliwIhBCSJhDIJl0LWb5KNdjWRJIH8vbRMEmX1UY_fOdw9RHyE1gNDMTFprbD1tScAdRM1ox1X8gJdA1UbdPwr-XMVFeJcjkmpyltWFkttN_IMQcppei7E_L6kGj-ixGpWahf3LTiYpEGR4cwvtHZpETDQkf_gikbOmPBImZcsi_P2c9YUrQUDH4XIqYrek1tmLcmmux3SFNeS01B1-VlnUzG9J0cOTMl_PGxn5E_d7fPN_fV49Pvh5vrx8o2SuUKwCpn3NjLlo_OAkDLlVSdkwKZaJ2ThnMxWKEcNKikaLhSYFsB2CgnbXNGzg-92xhe1zK9nn2yOE1mwbAm3fedKq29KiQ_kDaGlCI6vY1-NvFNA9N703qj96b13rRmUhfTJfTro34dZhz_RT7VFuDyAGD55M5j1Mn6vdzRR7RZj8H_r_8drhyP0Q</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>885911189</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Is there an influence of body mass on digesta mean retention time in herbivores? A comparative study on ungulates</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Steuer, Patrick ; Südekum, Karl-Heinz ; Müller, Dennis W.H. ; Franz, Ragna ; Kaandorp, Jacques ; Clauss, Marcus ; Hummel, Jürgen</creator><creatorcontrib>Steuer, Patrick ; Südekum, Karl-Heinz ; Müller, Dennis W.H. ; Franz, Ragna ; Kaandorp, Jacques ; Clauss, Marcus ; Hummel, Jürgen</creatorcontrib><description>The relation between body mass (BM) and digesta mean retention time (MRT) in herbivores was the focus of several studies in recent years. It was assumed that MRT scaled with BM 0.25 based on the isometric scaling of gut capacity (BM 1.0) and allometric scaling of energy intake (BM 0.75). Literature studies that tested this hypothesis produced conflicting results, arriving sometimes at higher or lower exponents than the postulated 0.25. This study was conducted with 8 ruminants ( n = 2–6 per species) and 6 hindgut fermenting species/breeds ( n = 2–6, warthog n = 1) with a BM range of 60–4000 kg. All animals received a ration of 100% grass hay with ad libitum access. Dry matter intake was measured and the MRT was estimated by the use of a solute and a particle (1–2 mm) marker. No significant scaling of MRT particle with BM was observed for all herbivores (32 BM 0.04, p = 0.518) and hindgut fermenters (32 BM 0.00, p = 1.00). The scaling exponent for ruminants only showed a tendency towards significance (29 BM 0.12, p = 0.071). Ruminants on average had an MRT particle 1.61-fold longer than hindgut fermenters. Whereas an exponent of 0.25 is reasonable from theoretical considerations, much lower exponents were found in this and other studies. The energetic benefit of increasing MRT is by no means continuous, since the energy released from a given food unit via digestion decreases over time. The low and non-significant scaling factors for both digestion types suggest that in ungulates, MRT is less influenced by BM (maximal allometric exponent ≤ 0.1) than often reported.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1095-6433</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1531-4332</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.cbpa.2011.07.005</identifier><identifier>PMID: 21777685</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Allometry ; Animals ; Body Weight - physiology ; Cattle ; Digestion - physiology ; Eating - physiology ; Herbivory - physiology ; Hindgut fermenters ; Nutritional Status - physiology ; Passage ; Ruminants ; Ruminants - physiology ; Scaling ; Species Specificity</subject><ispartof>Comparative biochemistry and physiology. Part A, Molecular &amp; integrative physiology, 2011-11, Vol.160 (3), p.355-364</ispartof><rights>2011 Elsevier Inc.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c399t-11c9fafd8742dfc111429795f76e064ff7a226bc69f13e97632991c461e39f7c3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c399t-11c9fafd8742dfc111429795f76e064ff7a226bc69f13e97632991c461e39f7c3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S109564331100208X$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21777685$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Steuer, Patrick</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Südekum, Karl-Heinz</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Müller, Dennis W.H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Franz, Ragna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kaandorp, Jacques</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Clauss, Marcus</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hummel, Jürgen</creatorcontrib><title>Is there an influence of body mass on digesta mean retention time in herbivores? A comparative study on ungulates</title><title>Comparative biochemistry and physiology. Part A, Molecular &amp; integrative physiology</title><addtitle>Comp Biochem Physiol A Mol Integr Physiol</addtitle><description>The relation between body mass (BM) and digesta mean retention time (MRT) in herbivores was the focus of several studies in recent years. It was assumed that MRT scaled with BM 0.25 based on the isometric scaling of gut capacity (BM 1.0) and allometric scaling of energy intake (BM 0.75). Literature studies that tested this hypothesis produced conflicting results, arriving sometimes at higher or lower exponents than the postulated 0.25. This study was conducted with 8 ruminants ( n = 2–6 per species) and 6 hindgut fermenting species/breeds ( n = 2–6, warthog n = 1) with a BM range of 60–4000 kg. All animals received a ration of 100% grass hay with ad libitum access. Dry matter intake was measured and the MRT was estimated by the use of a solute and a particle (1–2 mm) marker. No significant scaling of MRT particle with BM was observed for all herbivores (32 BM 0.04, p = 0.518) and hindgut fermenters (32 BM 0.00, p = 1.00). The scaling exponent for ruminants only showed a tendency towards significance (29 BM 0.12, p = 0.071). Ruminants on average had an MRT particle 1.61-fold longer than hindgut fermenters. Whereas an exponent of 0.25 is reasonable from theoretical considerations, much lower exponents were found in this and other studies. The energetic benefit of increasing MRT is by no means continuous, since the energy released from a given food unit via digestion decreases over time. The low and non-significant scaling factors for both digestion types suggest that in ungulates, MRT is less influenced by BM (maximal allometric exponent ≤ 0.1) than often reported.</description><subject>Allometry</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Body Weight - physiology</subject><subject>Cattle</subject><subject>Digestion - physiology</subject><subject>Eating - physiology</subject><subject>Herbivory - physiology</subject><subject>Hindgut fermenters</subject><subject>Nutritional Status - physiology</subject><subject>Passage</subject><subject>Ruminants</subject><subject>Ruminants - physiology</subject><subject>Scaling</subject><subject>Species Specificity</subject><issn>1095-6433</issn><issn>1531-4332</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2011</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kM1q3DAUhUVpaH7aF-iiaJeVHV3ZliwIhBCSJhDIJl0LWb5KNdjWRJIH8vbRMEmX1UY_fOdw9RHyE1gNDMTFprbD1tScAdRM1ox1X8gJdA1UbdPwr-XMVFeJcjkmpyltWFkttN_IMQcppei7E_L6kGj-ixGpWahf3LTiYpEGR4cwvtHZpETDQkf_gikbOmPBImZcsi_P2c9YUrQUDH4XIqYrek1tmLcmmux3SFNeS01B1-VlnUzG9J0cOTMl_PGxn5E_d7fPN_fV49Pvh5vrx8o2SuUKwCpn3NjLlo_OAkDLlVSdkwKZaJ2ThnMxWKEcNKikaLhSYFsB2CgnbXNGzg-92xhe1zK9nn2yOE1mwbAm3fedKq29KiQ_kDaGlCI6vY1-NvFNA9N703qj96b13rRmUhfTJfTro34dZhz_RT7VFuDyAGD55M5j1Mn6vdzRR7RZj8H_r_8drhyP0Q</recordid><startdate>20111101</startdate><enddate>20111101</enddate><creator>Steuer, Patrick</creator><creator>Südekum, Karl-Heinz</creator><creator>Müller, Dennis W.H.</creator><creator>Franz, Ragna</creator><creator>Kaandorp, Jacques</creator><creator>Clauss, Marcus</creator><creator>Hummel, Jürgen</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20111101</creationdate><title>Is there an influence of body mass on digesta mean retention time in herbivores? A comparative study on ungulates</title><author>Steuer, Patrick ; Südekum, Karl-Heinz ; Müller, Dennis W.H. ; Franz, Ragna ; Kaandorp, Jacques ; Clauss, Marcus ; Hummel, Jürgen</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c399t-11c9fafd8742dfc111429795f76e064ff7a226bc69f13e97632991c461e39f7c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2011</creationdate><topic>Allometry</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Body Weight - physiology</topic><topic>Cattle</topic><topic>Digestion - physiology</topic><topic>Eating - physiology</topic><topic>Herbivory - physiology</topic><topic>Hindgut fermenters</topic><topic>Nutritional Status - physiology</topic><topic>Passage</topic><topic>Ruminants</topic><topic>Ruminants - physiology</topic><topic>Scaling</topic><topic>Species Specificity</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Steuer, Patrick</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Südekum, Karl-Heinz</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Müller, Dennis W.H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Franz, Ragna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kaandorp, Jacques</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Clauss, Marcus</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hummel, Jürgen</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Comparative biochemistry and physiology. Part A, Molecular &amp; integrative physiology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Steuer, Patrick</au><au>Südekum, Karl-Heinz</au><au>Müller, Dennis W.H.</au><au>Franz, Ragna</au><au>Kaandorp, Jacques</au><au>Clauss, Marcus</au><au>Hummel, Jürgen</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Is there an influence of body mass on digesta mean retention time in herbivores? A comparative study on ungulates</atitle><jtitle>Comparative biochemistry and physiology. Part A, Molecular &amp; integrative physiology</jtitle><addtitle>Comp Biochem Physiol A Mol Integr Physiol</addtitle><date>2011-11-01</date><risdate>2011</risdate><volume>160</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>355</spage><epage>364</epage><pages>355-364</pages><issn>1095-6433</issn><eissn>1531-4332</eissn><abstract>The relation between body mass (BM) and digesta mean retention time (MRT) in herbivores was the focus of several studies in recent years. It was assumed that MRT scaled with BM 0.25 based on the isometric scaling of gut capacity (BM 1.0) and allometric scaling of energy intake (BM 0.75). Literature studies that tested this hypothesis produced conflicting results, arriving sometimes at higher or lower exponents than the postulated 0.25. This study was conducted with 8 ruminants ( n = 2–6 per species) and 6 hindgut fermenting species/breeds ( n = 2–6, warthog n = 1) with a BM range of 60–4000 kg. All animals received a ration of 100% grass hay with ad libitum access. Dry matter intake was measured and the MRT was estimated by the use of a solute and a particle (1–2 mm) marker. No significant scaling of MRT particle with BM was observed for all herbivores (32 BM 0.04, p = 0.518) and hindgut fermenters (32 BM 0.00, p = 1.00). The scaling exponent for ruminants only showed a tendency towards significance (29 BM 0.12, p = 0.071). Ruminants on average had an MRT particle 1.61-fold longer than hindgut fermenters. Whereas an exponent of 0.25 is reasonable from theoretical considerations, much lower exponents were found in this and other studies. The energetic benefit of increasing MRT is by no means continuous, since the energy released from a given food unit via digestion decreases over time. The low and non-significant scaling factors for both digestion types suggest that in ungulates, MRT is less influenced by BM (maximal allometric exponent ≤ 0.1) than often reported.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>21777685</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.cbpa.2011.07.005</doi><tpages>10</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1095-6433
ispartof Comparative biochemistry and physiology. Part A, Molecular & integrative physiology, 2011-11, Vol.160 (3), p.355-364
issn 1095-6433
1531-4332
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_885911189
source MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals
subjects Allometry
Animals
Body Weight - physiology
Cattle
Digestion - physiology
Eating - physiology
Herbivory - physiology
Hindgut fermenters
Nutritional Status - physiology
Passage
Ruminants
Ruminants - physiology
Scaling
Species Specificity
title Is there an influence of body mass on digesta mean retention time in herbivores? A comparative study on ungulates
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-02T09%3A19%3A02IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Is%20there%20an%20influence%20of%20body%20mass%20on%20digesta%20mean%20retention%20time%20in%20herbivores?%20A%20comparative%20study%20on%20ungulates&rft.jtitle=Comparative%20biochemistry%20and%20physiology.%20Part%20A,%20Molecular%20&%20integrative%20physiology&rft.au=Steuer,%20Patrick&rft.date=2011-11-01&rft.volume=160&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=355&rft.epage=364&rft.pages=355-364&rft.issn=1095-6433&rft.eissn=1531-4332&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.cbpa.2011.07.005&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E885911189%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=885911189&rft_id=info:pmid/21777685&rft_els_id=S109564331100208X&rfr_iscdi=true