Colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection for elderly patients at least 80 years of age

Background Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) has been used recently for successful en bloc resection of even large lesions, although no consensus appears in medical literature concerning its application to elderly patients. This prospective cohort study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Surgical endoscopy 2011-09, Vol.25 (9), p.3000-3007
Hauptverfasser: Uraoka, Toshio, Higashi, Reiji, Kato, Jun, Kaji, Eisuke, Suzuki, Hideyuki, Ishikawa, Shin, Akita, Mitsuhiro, Hirakawa, Tomoko, Saito, Shunsuke, Hori, Keisuke, Kawahara, Yoshiro, Mead, Robert J., Yamamoto, Kazuhide
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 3007
container_issue 9
container_start_page 3000
container_title Surgical endoscopy
container_volume 25
creator Uraoka, Toshio
Higashi, Reiji
Kato, Jun
Kaji, Eisuke
Suzuki, Hideyuki
Ishikawa, Shin
Akita, Mitsuhiro
Hirakawa, Tomoko
Saito, Shunsuke
Hori, Keisuke
Kawahara, Yoshiro
Mead, Robert J.
Yamamoto, Kazuhide
description Background Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) has been used recently for successful en bloc resection of even large lesions, although no consensus appears in medical literature concerning its application to elderly patients. This prospective cohort study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of colorectal ESD for patients 80 years of age or older. Methods Colorectal ESD procedure findings were compared with clinical outcomes, including associated complications and mortalities, for two age groups totaling 196 consecutive patients with 202 colorectal lesions. Of the 196 patients, 31 patients (16%) were 80 years of age or older (group E), and 165 patients (84%) were younger than 80 years (group Y). Results The median ages were 82 years in group E and 68 years in group Y. The frequency of chronic concomitant diseases was significantly higher in group E (65%) than in group Y (27%) ( p  = 0.003). No significant pressure decrease or need for oxygenation was observed in either group. In addition, groups E and Y did not differ significantly in terms of mean lesion sizes (40.9 vs. 39.7 mm) en bloc resection rates (84% vs. 93%), curative rates (78% vs. 84%), median procedure times (65 vs. 70 min), or associated complications (no perforation or delayed bleeding cases [0%] vs. 5 perforations [3%]) The median postprocedure hospitalization period was 3 days in both groups. Except for 10 cases requiring subsequent lymph node dissection surgery, follow-up colonoscopy examinations showed no recurrences or ESD-related mortalities in either group. Conclusion Colorectal ESD is a safe and effective treatment for elderly patients (age ≥ 80 years) despite a significantly higher frequency of chronic concomitant diseases than among younger patients.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s00464-011-1660-y
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_885292773</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2433483141</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-p210t-6d0f80d7c9676623de05489105cbc3933a340bfd3620d736bb11666a5e69bc83</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpd0ctKxDAUBuAgijOOPoAbCW5cRU8uTdOlDN5gwM2s3IQ0TYcOnaYm7aJv47P4ZGaYEcFVIOfjkPw_QtcU7ilA_hABhBQEKCVUSiDTCZpTwRlhjKpTNIeCA2F5IWboIsYtJF7Q7BzNGBVKZJzN0cfStz44O5gWu67y0fq-sTiO5W60PqbbqokxzRvf4doH7NrKhXbCvRka1w0RmwG3zsQBK_j-mpwJEfsam427RGe1aaO7Op4LtH5-Wi9fyer95W35uCI9ozAQWUGtoMptIXMpGa8cZEIVFDJbWl5wbriAsq64ZElxWZY0fVaazMmitIov0N1hbR_85-jioHdNtK5tTef8GLVSGStYnvMkb__JrR9Dl96WkFAyS7EkdHNEKQJX6T40OxMm_RtZAuwAYhp1Gxf-tlDQ-170oRedetH7XvTEfwBkGn4A</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>884865214</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection for elderly patients at least 80 years of age</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals</source><creator>Uraoka, Toshio ; Higashi, Reiji ; Kato, Jun ; Kaji, Eisuke ; Suzuki, Hideyuki ; Ishikawa, Shin ; Akita, Mitsuhiro ; Hirakawa, Tomoko ; Saito, Shunsuke ; Hori, Keisuke ; Kawahara, Yoshiro ; Mead, Robert J. ; Yamamoto, Kazuhide</creator><creatorcontrib>Uraoka, Toshio ; Higashi, Reiji ; Kato, Jun ; Kaji, Eisuke ; Suzuki, Hideyuki ; Ishikawa, Shin ; Akita, Mitsuhiro ; Hirakawa, Tomoko ; Saito, Shunsuke ; Hori, Keisuke ; Kawahara, Yoshiro ; Mead, Robert J. ; Yamamoto, Kazuhide</creatorcontrib><description>Background Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) has been used recently for successful en bloc resection of even large lesions, although no consensus appears in medical literature concerning its application to elderly patients. This prospective cohort study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of colorectal ESD for patients 80 years of age or older. Methods Colorectal ESD procedure findings were compared with clinical outcomes, including associated complications and mortalities, for two age groups totaling 196 consecutive patients with 202 colorectal lesions. Of the 196 patients, 31 patients (16%) were 80 years of age or older (group E), and 165 patients (84%) were younger than 80 years (group Y). Results The median ages were 82 years in group E and 68 years in group Y. The frequency of chronic concomitant diseases was significantly higher in group E (65%) than in group Y (27%) ( p  = 0.003). No significant pressure decrease or need for oxygenation was observed in either group. In addition, groups E and Y did not differ significantly in terms of mean lesion sizes (40.9 vs. 39.7 mm) en bloc resection rates (84% vs. 93%), curative rates (78% vs. 84%), median procedure times (65 vs. 70 min), or associated complications (no perforation or delayed bleeding cases [0%] vs. 5 perforations [3%]) The median postprocedure hospitalization period was 3 days in both groups. Except for 10 cases requiring subsequent lymph node dissection surgery, follow-up colonoscopy examinations showed no recurrences or ESD-related mortalities in either group. Conclusion Colorectal ESD is a safe and effective treatment for elderly patients (age ≥ 80 years) despite a significantly higher frequency of chronic concomitant diseases than among younger patients.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0930-2794</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1432-2218</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s00464-011-1660-y</identifier><identifier>PMID: 21484532</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: Springer-Verlag</publisher><subject>Abdominal Surgery ; Adenocarcinoma - epidemiology ; Adenocarcinoma - surgery ; Age ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Anesthesia ; Cancer ; Colonoscopy ; Colorectal Neoplasms - epidemiology ; Colorectal Neoplasms - surgery ; Disease ; Dissection ; Endoscopy ; Endoscopy, Gastrointestinal - methods ; Female ; Follow-Up Studies ; Gastroenterology ; Gynecology ; Hepatology ; Hospitals ; Humans ; Intestinal Perforation - epidemiology ; Intraoperative Complications - epidemiology ; Japan - epidemiology ; Lymph Node Excision ; Lymphatic system ; Male ; Medicine ; Medicine &amp; Public Health ; Middle Aged ; Older people ; Patients ; Proctology ; Prospective Studies ; Surgery</subject><ispartof>Surgical endoscopy, 2011-09, Vol.25 (9), p.3000-3007</ispartof><rights>Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2011</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-p210t-6d0f80d7c9676623de05489105cbc3933a340bfd3620d736bb11666a5e69bc83</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s00464-011-1660-y$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00464-011-1660-y$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902,41464,42533,51294</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21484532$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Uraoka, Toshio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Higashi, Reiji</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kato, Jun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kaji, Eisuke</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Suzuki, Hideyuki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ishikawa, Shin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Akita, Mitsuhiro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hirakawa, Tomoko</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Saito, Shunsuke</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hori, Keisuke</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kawahara, Yoshiro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mead, Robert J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yamamoto, Kazuhide</creatorcontrib><title>Colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection for elderly patients at least 80 years of age</title><title>Surgical endoscopy</title><addtitle>Surg Endosc</addtitle><addtitle>Surg Endosc</addtitle><description>Background Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) has been used recently for successful en bloc resection of even large lesions, although no consensus appears in medical literature concerning its application to elderly patients. This prospective cohort study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of colorectal ESD for patients 80 years of age or older. Methods Colorectal ESD procedure findings were compared with clinical outcomes, including associated complications and mortalities, for two age groups totaling 196 consecutive patients with 202 colorectal lesions. Of the 196 patients, 31 patients (16%) were 80 years of age or older (group E), and 165 patients (84%) were younger than 80 years (group Y). Results The median ages were 82 years in group E and 68 years in group Y. The frequency of chronic concomitant diseases was significantly higher in group E (65%) than in group Y (27%) ( p  = 0.003). No significant pressure decrease or need for oxygenation was observed in either group. In addition, groups E and Y did not differ significantly in terms of mean lesion sizes (40.9 vs. 39.7 mm) en bloc resection rates (84% vs. 93%), curative rates (78% vs. 84%), median procedure times (65 vs. 70 min), or associated complications (no perforation or delayed bleeding cases [0%] vs. 5 perforations [3%]) The median postprocedure hospitalization period was 3 days in both groups. Except for 10 cases requiring subsequent lymph node dissection surgery, follow-up colonoscopy examinations showed no recurrences or ESD-related mortalities in either group. Conclusion Colorectal ESD is a safe and effective treatment for elderly patients (age ≥ 80 years) despite a significantly higher frequency of chronic concomitant diseases than among younger patients.</description><subject>Abdominal Surgery</subject><subject>Adenocarcinoma - epidemiology</subject><subject>Adenocarcinoma - surgery</subject><subject>Age</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>Anesthesia</subject><subject>Cancer</subject><subject>Colonoscopy</subject><subject>Colorectal Neoplasms - epidemiology</subject><subject>Colorectal Neoplasms - surgery</subject><subject>Disease</subject><subject>Dissection</subject><subject>Endoscopy</subject><subject>Endoscopy, Gastrointestinal - methods</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Follow-Up Studies</subject><subject>Gastroenterology</subject><subject>Gynecology</subject><subject>Hepatology</subject><subject>Hospitals</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Intestinal Perforation - epidemiology</subject><subject>Intraoperative Complications - epidemiology</subject><subject>Japan - epidemiology</subject><subject>Lymph Node Excision</subject><subject>Lymphatic system</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine &amp; Public Health</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Older people</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Proctology</subject><subject>Prospective Studies</subject><subject>Surgery</subject><issn>0930-2794</issn><issn>1432-2218</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2011</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNpd0ctKxDAUBuAgijOOPoAbCW5cRU8uTdOlDN5gwM2s3IQ0TYcOnaYm7aJv47P4ZGaYEcFVIOfjkPw_QtcU7ilA_hABhBQEKCVUSiDTCZpTwRlhjKpTNIeCA2F5IWboIsYtJF7Q7BzNGBVKZJzN0cfStz44O5gWu67y0fq-sTiO5W60PqbbqokxzRvf4doH7NrKhXbCvRka1w0RmwG3zsQBK_j-mpwJEfsam427RGe1aaO7Op4LtH5-Wi9fyer95W35uCI9ozAQWUGtoMptIXMpGa8cZEIVFDJbWl5wbriAsq64ZElxWZY0fVaazMmitIov0N1hbR_85-jioHdNtK5tTef8GLVSGStYnvMkb__JrR9Dl96WkFAyS7EkdHNEKQJX6T40OxMm_RtZAuwAYhp1Gxf-tlDQ-170oRedetH7XvTEfwBkGn4A</recordid><startdate>20110901</startdate><enddate>20110901</enddate><creator>Uraoka, Toshio</creator><creator>Higashi, Reiji</creator><creator>Kato, Jun</creator><creator>Kaji, Eisuke</creator><creator>Suzuki, Hideyuki</creator><creator>Ishikawa, Shin</creator><creator>Akita, Mitsuhiro</creator><creator>Hirakawa, Tomoko</creator><creator>Saito, Shunsuke</creator><creator>Hori, Keisuke</creator><creator>Kawahara, Yoshiro</creator><creator>Mead, Robert J.</creator><creator>Yamamoto, Kazuhide</creator><general>Springer-Verlag</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20110901</creationdate><title>Colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection for elderly patients at least 80 years of age</title><author>Uraoka, Toshio ; Higashi, Reiji ; Kato, Jun ; Kaji, Eisuke ; Suzuki, Hideyuki ; Ishikawa, Shin ; Akita, Mitsuhiro ; Hirakawa, Tomoko ; Saito, Shunsuke ; Hori, Keisuke ; Kawahara, Yoshiro ; Mead, Robert J. ; Yamamoto, Kazuhide</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-p210t-6d0f80d7c9676623de05489105cbc3933a340bfd3620d736bb11666a5e69bc83</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2011</creationdate><topic>Abdominal Surgery</topic><topic>Adenocarcinoma - epidemiology</topic><topic>Adenocarcinoma - surgery</topic><topic>Age</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>Anesthesia</topic><topic>Cancer</topic><topic>Colonoscopy</topic><topic>Colorectal Neoplasms - epidemiology</topic><topic>Colorectal Neoplasms - surgery</topic><topic>Disease</topic><topic>Dissection</topic><topic>Endoscopy</topic><topic>Endoscopy, Gastrointestinal - methods</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Follow-Up Studies</topic><topic>Gastroenterology</topic><topic>Gynecology</topic><topic>Hepatology</topic><topic>Hospitals</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Intestinal Perforation - epidemiology</topic><topic>Intraoperative Complications - epidemiology</topic><topic>Japan - epidemiology</topic><topic>Lymph Node Excision</topic><topic>Lymphatic system</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine &amp; Public Health</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Older people</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Proctology</topic><topic>Prospective Studies</topic><topic>Surgery</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Uraoka, Toshio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Higashi, Reiji</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kato, Jun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kaji, Eisuke</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Suzuki, Hideyuki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ishikawa, Shin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Akita, Mitsuhiro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hirakawa, Tomoko</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Saito, Shunsuke</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hori, Keisuke</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kawahara, Yoshiro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mead, Robert J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yamamoto, Kazuhide</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Proquest Nursing &amp; Allied Health Source</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Surgical endoscopy</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Uraoka, Toshio</au><au>Higashi, Reiji</au><au>Kato, Jun</au><au>Kaji, Eisuke</au><au>Suzuki, Hideyuki</au><au>Ishikawa, Shin</au><au>Akita, Mitsuhiro</au><au>Hirakawa, Tomoko</au><au>Saito, Shunsuke</au><au>Hori, Keisuke</au><au>Kawahara, Yoshiro</au><au>Mead, Robert J.</au><au>Yamamoto, Kazuhide</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection for elderly patients at least 80 years of age</atitle><jtitle>Surgical endoscopy</jtitle><stitle>Surg Endosc</stitle><addtitle>Surg Endosc</addtitle><date>2011-09-01</date><risdate>2011</risdate><volume>25</volume><issue>9</issue><spage>3000</spage><epage>3007</epage><pages>3000-3007</pages><issn>0930-2794</issn><eissn>1432-2218</eissn><abstract>Background Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) has been used recently for successful en bloc resection of even large lesions, although no consensus appears in medical literature concerning its application to elderly patients. This prospective cohort study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of colorectal ESD for patients 80 years of age or older. Methods Colorectal ESD procedure findings were compared with clinical outcomes, including associated complications and mortalities, for two age groups totaling 196 consecutive patients with 202 colorectal lesions. Of the 196 patients, 31 patients (16%) were 80 years of age or older (group E), and 165 patients (84%) were younger than 80 years (group Y). Results The median ages were 82 years in group E and 68 years in group Y. The frequency of chronic concomitant diseases was significantly higher in group E (65%) than in group Y (27%) ( p  = 0.003). No significant pressure decrease or need for oxygenation was observed in either group. In addition, groups E and Y did not differ significantly in terms of mean lesion sizes (40.9 vs. 39.7 mm) en bloc resection rates (84% vs. 93%), curative rates (78% vs. 84%), median procedure times (65 vs. 70 min), or associated complications (no perforation or delayed bleeding cases [0%] vs. 5 perforations [3%]) The median postprocedure hospitalization period was 3 days in both groups. Except for 10 cases requiring subsequent lymph node dissection surgery, follow-up colonoscopy examinations showed no recurrences or ESD-related mortalities in either group. Conclusion Colorectal ESD is a safe and effective treatment for elderly patients (age ≥ 80 years) despite a significantly higher frequency of chronic concomitant diseases than among younger patients.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>Springer-Verlag</pub><pmid>21484532</pmid><doi>10.1007/s00464-011-1660-y</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0930-2794
ispartof Surgical endoscopy, 2011-09, Vol.25 (9), p.3000-3007
issn 0930-2794
1432-2218
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_885292773
source MEDLINE; Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals
subjects Abdominal Surgery
Adenocarcinoma - epidemiology
Adenocarcinoma - surgery
Age
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Anesthesia
Cancer
Colonoscopy
Colorectal Neoplasms - epidemiology
Colorectal Neoplasms - surgery
Disease
Dissection
Endoscopy
Endoscopy, Gastrointestinal - methods
Female
Follow-Up Studies
Gastroenterology
Gynecology
Hepatology
Hospitals
Humans
Intestinal Perforation - epidemiology
Intraoperative Complications - epidemiology
Japan - epidemiology
Lymph Node Excision
Lymphatic system
Male
Medicine
Medicine & Public Health
Middle Aged
Older people
Patients
Proctology
Prospective Studies
Surgery
title Colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection for elderly patients at least 80 years of age
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-01T04%3A00%3A20IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Colorectal%20endoscopic%20submucosal%20dissection%20for%20elderly%20patients%20at%20least%2080%C2%A0years%20of%20age&rft.jtitle=Surgical%20endoscopy&rft.au=Uraoka,%20Toshio&rft.date=2011-09-01&rft.volume=25&rft.issue=9&rft.spage=3000&rft.epage=3007&rft.pages=3000-3007&rft.issn=0930-2794&rft.eissn=1432-2218&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s00464-011-1660-y&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2433483141%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=884865214&rft_id=info:pmid/21484532&rfr_iscdi=true