Colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection for elderly patients at least 80 years of age
Background Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) has been used recently for successful en bloc resection of even large lesions, although no consensus appears in medical literature concerning its application to elderly patients. This prospective cohort study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Surgical endoscopy 2011-09, Vol.25 (9), p.3000-3007 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 3007 |
---|---|
container_issue | 9 |
container_start_page | 3000 |
container_title | Surgical endoscopy |
container_volume | 25 |
creator | Uraoka, Toshio Higashi, Reiji Kato, Jun Kaji, Eisuke Suzuki, Hideyuki Ishikawa, Shin Akita, Mitsuhiro Hirakawa, Tomoko Saito, Shunsuke Hori, Keisuke Kawahara, Yoshiro Mead, Robert J. Yamamoto, Kazuhide |
description | Background
Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) has been used recently for successful en bloc resection of even large lesions, although no consensus appears in medical literature concerning its application to elderly patients. This prospective cohort study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of colorectal ESD for patients 80 years of age or older.
Methods
Colorectal ESD procedure findings were compared with clinical outcomes, including associated complications and mortalities, for two age groups totaling 196 consecutive patients with 202 colorectal lesions. Of the 196 patients, 31 patients (16%) were 80 years of age or older (group E), and 165 patients (84%) were younger than 80 years (group Y).
Results
The median ages were 82 years in group E and 68 years in group Y. The frequency of chronic concomitant diseases was significantly higher in group E (65%) than in group Y (27%) (
p
= 0.003). No significant pressure decrease or need for oxygenation was observed in either group. In addition, groups E and Y did not differ significantly in terms of mean lesion sizes (40.9 vs. 39.7 mm) en bloc resection rates (84% vs. 93%), curative rates (78% vs. 84%), median procedure times (65 vs. 70 min), or associated complications (no perforation or delayed bleeding cases [0%] vs. 5 perforations [3%]) The median postprocedure hospitalization period was 3 days in both groups. Except for 10 cases requiring subsequent lymph node dissection surgery, follow-up colonoscopy examinations showed no recurrences or ESD-related mortalities in either group.
Conclusion
Colorectal ESD is a safe and effective treatment for elderly patients (age ≥ 80 years) despite a significantly higher frequency of chronic concomitant diseases than among younger patients. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s00464-011-1660-y |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_885292773</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2433483141</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-p210t-6d0f80d7c9676623de05489105cbc3933a340bfd3620d736bb11666a5e69bc83</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpd0ctKxDAUBuAgijOOPoAbCW5cRU8uTdOlDN5gwM2s3IQ0TYcOnaYm7aJv47P4ZGaYEcFVIOfjkPw_QtcU7ilA_hABhBQEKCVUSiDTCZpTwRlhjKpTNIeCA2F5IWboIsYtJF7Q7BzNGBVKZJzN0cfStz44O5gWu67y0fq-sTiO5W60PqbbqokxzRvf4doH7NrKhXbCvRka1w0RmwG3zsQBK_j-mpwJEfsam427RGe1aaO7Op4LtH5-Wi9fyer95W35uCI9ozAQWUGtoMptIXMpGa8cZEIVFDJbWl5wbriAsq64ZElxWZY0fVaazMmitIov0N1hbR_85-jioHdNtK5tTef8GLVSGStYnvMkb__JrR9Dl96WkFAyS7EkdHNEKQJX6T40OxMm_RtZAuwAYhp1Gxf-tlDQ-170oRedetH7XvTEfwBkGn4A</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>884865214</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection for elderly patients at least 80 years of age</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals</source><creator>Uraoka, Toshio ; Higashi, Reiji ; Kato, Jun ; Kaji, Eisuke ; Suzuki, Hideyuki ; Ishikawa, Shin ; Akita, Mitsuhiro ; Hirakawa, Tomoko ; Saito, Shunsuke ; Hori, Keisuke ; Kawahara, Yoshiro ; Mead, Robert J. ; Yamamoto, Kazuhide</creator><creatorcontrib>Uraoka, Toshio ; Higashi, Reiji ; Kato, Jun ; Kaji, Eisuke ; Suzuki, Hideyuki ; Ishikawa, Shin ; Akita, Mitsuhiro ; Hirakawa, Tomoko ; Saito, Shunsuke ; Hori, Keisuke ; Kawahara, Yoshiro ; Mead, Robert J. ; Yamamoto, Kazuhide</creatorcontrib><description>Background
Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) has been used recently for successful en bloc resection of even large lesions, although no consensus appears in medical literature concerning its application to elderly patients. This prospective cohort study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of colorectal ESD for patients 80 years of age or older.
Methods
Colorectal ESD procedure findings were compared with clinical outcomes, including associated complications and mortalities, for two age groups totaling 196 consecutive patients with 202 colorectal lesions. Of the 196 patients, 31 patients (16%) were 80 years of age or older (group E), and 165 patients (84%) were younger than 80 years (group Y).
Results
The median ages were 82 years in group E and 68 years in group Y. The frequency of chronic concomitant diseases was significantly higher in group E (65%) than in group Y (27%) (
p
= 0.003). No significant pressure decrease or need for oxygenation was observed in either group. In addition, groups E and Y did not differ significantly in terms of mean lesion sizes (40.9 vs. 39.7 mm) en bloc resection rates (84% vs. 93%), curative rates (78% vs. 84%), median procedure times (65 vs. 70 min), or associated complications (no perforation or delayed bleeding cases [0%] vs. 5 perforations [3%]) The median postprocedure hospitalization period was 3 days in both groups. Except for 10 cases requiring subsequent lymph node dissection surgery, follow-up colonoscopy examinations showed no recurrences or ESD-related mortalities in either group.
Conclusion
Colorectal ESD is a safe and effective treatment for elderly patients (age ≥ 80 years) despite a significantly higher frequency of chronic concomitant diseases than among younger patients.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0930-2794</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1432-2218</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s00464-011-1660-y</identifier><identifier>PMID: 21484532</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: Springer-Verlag</publisher><subject>Abdominal Surgery ; Adenocarcinoma - epidemiology ; Adenocarcinoma - surgery ; Age ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Anesthesia ; Cancer ; Colonoscopy ; Colorectal Neoplasms - epidemiology ; Colorectal Neoplasms - surgery ; Disease ; Dissection ; Endoscopy ; Endoscopy, Gastrointestinal - methods ; Female ; Follow-Up Studies ; Gastroenterology ; Gynecology ; Hepatology ; Hospitals ; Humans ; Intestinal Perforation - epidemiology ; Intraoperative Complications - epidemiology ; Japan - epidemiology ; Lymph Node Excision ; Lymphatic system ; Male ; Medicine ; Medicine & Public Health ; Middle Aged ; Older people ; Patients ; Proctology ; Prospective Studies ; Surgery</subject><ispartof>Surgical endoscopy, 2011-09, Vol.25 (9), p.3000-3007</ispartof><rights>Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2011</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-p210t-6d0f80d7c9676623de05489105cbc3933a340bfd3620d736bb11666a5e69bc83</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s00464-011-1660-y$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00464-011-1660-y$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902,41464,42533,51294</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21484532$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Uraoka, Toshio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Higashi, Reiji</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kato, Jun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kaji, Eisuke</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Suzuki, Hideyuki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ishikawa, Shin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Akita, Mitsuhiro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hirakawa, Tomoko</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Saito, Shunsuke</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hori, Keisuke</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kawahara, Yoshiro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mead, Robert J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yamamoto, Kazuhide</creatorcontrib><title>Colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection for elderly patients at least 80 years of age</title><title>Surgical endoscopy</title><addtitle>Surg Endosc</addtitle><addtitle>Surg Endosc</addtitle><description>Background
Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) has been used recently for successful en bloc resection of even large lesions, although no consensus appears in medical literature concerning its application to elderly patients. This prospective cohort study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of colorectal ESD for patients 80 years of age or older.
Methods
Colorectal ESD procedure findings were compared with clinical outcomes, including associated complications and mortalities, for two age groups totaling 196 consecutive patients with 202 colorectal lesions. Of the 196 patients, 31 patients (16%) were 80 years of age or older (group E), and 165 patients (84%) were younger than 80 years (group Y).
Results
The median ages were 82 years in group E and 68 years in group Y. The frequency of chronic concomitant diseases was significantly higher in group E (65%) than in group Y (27%) (
p
= 0.003). No significant pressure decrease or need for oxygenation was observed in either group. In addition, groups E and Y did not differ significantly in terms of mean lesion sizes (40.9 vs. 39.7 mm) en bloc resection rates (84% vs. 93%), curative rates (78% vs. 84%), median procedure times (65 vs. 70 min), or associated complications (no perforation or delayed bleeding cases [0%] vs. 5 perforations [3%]) The median postprocedure hospitalization period was 3 days in both groups. Except for 10 cases requiring subsequent lymph node dissection surgery, follow-up colonoscopy examinations showed no recurrences or ESD-related mortalities in either group.
Conclusion
Colorectal ESD is a safe and effective treatment for elderly patients (age ≥ 80 years) despite a significantly higher frequency of chronic concomitant diseases than among younger patients.</description><subject>Abdominal Surgery</subject><subject>Adenocarcinoma - epidemiology</subject><subject>Adenocarcinoma - surgery</subject><subject>Age</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>Anesthesia</subject><subject>Cancer</subject><subject>Colonoscopy</subject><subject>Colorectal Neoplasms - epidemiology</subject><subject>Colorectal Neoplasms - surgery</subject><subject>Disease</subject><subject>Dissection</subject><subject>Endoscopy</subject><subject>Endoscopy, Gastrointestinal - methods</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Follow-Up Studies</subject><subject>Gastroenterology</subject><subject>Gynecology</subject><subject>Hepatology</subject><subject>Hospitals</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Intestinal Perforation - epidemiology</subject><subject>Intraoperative Complications - epidemiology</subject><subject>Japan - epidemiology</subject><subject>Lymph Node Excision</subject><subject>Lymphatic system</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine & Public Health</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Older people</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Proctology</subject><subject>Prospective Studies</subject><subject>Surgery</subject><issn>0930-2794</issn><issn>1432-2218</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2011</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNpd0ctKxDAUBuAgijOOPoAbCW5cRU8uTdOlDN5gwM2s3IQ0TYcOnaYm7aJv47P4ZGaYEcFVIOfjkPw_QtcU7ilA_hABhBQEKCVUSiDTCZpTwRlhjKpTNIeCA2F5IWboIsYtJF7Q7BzNGBVKZJzN0cfStz44O5gWu67y0fq-sTiO5W60PqbbqokxzRvf4doH7NrKhXbCvRka1w0RmwG3zsQBK_j-mpwJEfsam427RGe1aaO7Op4LtH5-Wi9fyer95W35uCI9ozAQWUGtoMptIXMpGa8cZEIVFDJbWl5wbriAsq64ZElxWZY0fVaazMmitIov0N1hbR_85-jioHdNtK5tTef8GLVSGStYnvMkb__JrR9Dl96WkFAyS7EkdHNEKQJX6T40OxMm_RtZAuwAYhp1Gxf-tlDQ-170oRedetH7XvTEfwBkGn4A</recordid><startdate>20110901</startdate><enddate>20110901</enddate><creator>Uraoka, Toshio</creator><creator>Higashi, Reiji</creator><creator>Kato, Jun</creator><creator>Kaji, Eisuke</creator><creator>Suzuki, Hideyuki</creator><creator>Ishikawa, Shin</creator><creator>Akita, Mitsuhiro</creator><creator>Hirakawa, Tomoko</creator><creator>Saito, Shunsuke</creator><creator>Hori, Keisuke</creator><creator>Kawahara, Yoshiro</creator><creator>Mead, Robert J.</creator><creator>Yamamoto, Kazuhide</creator><general>Springer-Verlag</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20110901</creationdate><title>Colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection for elderly patients at least 80 years of age</title><author>Uraoka, Toshio ; Higashi, Reiji ; Kato, Jun ; Kaji, Eisuke ; Suzuki, Hideyuki ; Ishikawa, Shin ; Akita, Mitsuhiro ; Hirakawa, Tomoko ; Saito, Shunsuke ; Hori, Keisuke ; Kawahara, Yoshiro ; Mead, Robert J. ; Yamamoto, Kazuhide</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-p210t-6d0f80d7c9676623de05489105cbc3933a340bfd3620d736bb11666a5e69bc83</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2011</creationdate><topic>Abdominal Surgery</topic><topic>Adenocarcinoma - epidemiology</topic><topic>Adenocarcinoma - surgery</topic><topic>Age</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>Anesthesia</topic><topic>Cancer</topic><topic>Colonoscopy</topic><topic>Colorectal Neoplasms - epidemiology</topic><topic>Colorectal Neoplasms - surgery</topic><topic>Disease</topic><topic>Dissection</topic><topic>Endoscopy</topic><topic>Endoscopy, Gastrointestinal - methods</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Follow-Up Studies</topic><topic>Gastroenterology</topic><topic>Gynecology</topic><topic>Hepatology</topic><topic>Hospitals</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Intestinal Perforation - epidemiology</topic><topic>Intraoperative Complications - epidemiology</topic><topic>Japan - epidemiology</topic><topic>Lymph Node Excision</topic><topic>Lymphatic system</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine & Public Health</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Older people</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Proctology</topic><topic>Prospective Studies</topic><topic>Surgery</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Uraoka, Toshio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Higashi, Reiji</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kato, Jun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kaji, Eisuke</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Suzuki, Hideyuki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ishikawa, Shin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Akita, Mitsuhiro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hirakawa, Tomoko</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Saito, Shunsuke</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hori, Keisuke</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kawahara, Yoshiro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mead, Robert J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yamamoto, Kazuhide</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Proquest Nursing & Allied Health Source</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Surgical endoscopy</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Uraoka, Toshio</au><au>Higashi, Reiji</au><au>Kato, Jun</au><au>Kaji, Eisuke</au><au>Suzuki, Hideyuki</au><au>Ishikawa, Shin</au><au>Akita, Mitsuhiro</au><au>Hirakawa, Tomoko</au><au>Saito, Shunsuke</au><au>Hori, Keisuke</au><au>Kawahara, Yoshiro</au><au>Mead, Robert J.</au><au>Yamamoto, Kazuhide</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection for elderly patients at least 80 years of age</atitle><jtitle>Surgical endoscopy</jtitle><stitle>Surg Endosc</stitle><addtitle>Surg Endosc</addtitle><date>2011-09-01</date><risdate>2011</risdate><volume>25</volume><issue>9</issue><spage>3000</spage><epage>3007</epage><pages>3000-3007</pages><issn>0930-2794</issn><eissn>1432-2218</eissn><abstract>Background
Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) has been used recently for successful en bloc resection of even large lesions, although no consensus appears in medical literature concerning its application to elderly patients. This prospective cohort study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of colorectal ESD for patients 80 years of age or older.
Methods
Colorectal ESD procedure findings were compared with clinical outcomes, including associated complications and mortalities, for two age groups totaling 196 consecutive patients with 202 colorectal lesions. Of the 196 patients, 31 patients (16%) were 80 years of age or older (group E), and 165 patients (84%) were younger than 80 years (group Y).
Results
The median ages were 82 years in group E and 68 years in group Y. The frequency of chronic concomitant diseases was significantly higher in group E (65%) than in group Y (27%) (
p
= 0.003). No significant pressure decrease or need for oxygenation was observed in either group. In addition, groups E and Y did not differ significantly in terms of mean lesion sizes (40.9 vs. 39.7 mm) en bloc resection rates (84% vs. 93%), curative rates (78% vs. 84%), median procedure times (65 vs. 70 min), or associated complications (no perforation or delayed bleeding cases [0%] vs. 5 perforations [3%]) The median postprocedure hospitalization period was 3 days in both groups. Except for 10 cases requiring subsequent lymph node dissection surgery, follow-up colonoscopy examinations showed no recurrences or ESD-related mortalities in either group.
Conclusion
Colorectal ESD is a safe and effective treatment for elderly patients (age ≥ 80 years) despite a significantly higher frequency of chronic concomitant diseases than among younger patients.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>Springer-Verlag</pub><pmid>21484532</pmid><doi>10.1007/s00464-011-1660-y</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0930-2794 |
ispartof | Surgical endoscopy, 2011-09, Vol.25 (9), p.3000-3007 |
issn | 0930-2794 1432-2218 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_885292773 |
source | MEDLINE; Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals |
subjects | Abdominal Surgery Adenocarcinoma - epidemiology Adenocarcinoma - surgery Age Aged Aged, 80 and over Anesthesia Cancer Colonoscopy Colorectal Neoplasms - epidemiology Colorectal Neoplasms - surgery Disease Dissection Endoscopy Endoscopy, Gastrointestinal - methods Female Follow-Up Studies Gastroenterology Gynecology Hepatology Hospitals Humans Intestinal Perforation - epidemiology Intraoperative Complications - epidemiology Japan - epidemiology Lymph Node Excision Lymphatic system Male Medicine Medicine & Public Health Middle Aged Older people Patients Proctology Prospective Studies Surgery |
title | Colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection for elderly patients at least 80 years of age |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-01T04%3A00%3A20IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Colorectal%20endoscopic%20submucosal%20dissection%20for%20elderly%20patients%20at%20least%2080%C2%A0years%20of%20age&rft.jtitle=Surgical%20endoscopy&rft.au=Uraoka,%20Toshio&rft.date=2011-09-01&rft.volume=25&rft.issue=9&rft.spage=3000&rft.epage=3007&rft.pages=3000-3007&rft.issn=0930-2794&rft.eissn=1432-2218&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s00464-011-1660-y&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2433483141%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=884865214&rft_id=info:pmid/21484532&rfr_iscdi=true |