On the information content of ratings: an analysis of the origin of Moody's stock and bond ratings
John Moody published his first railroad security analysis and ratings manual in April 1909. This study analyzes several current issues by looking back at Moody's original intentions for constructing a ratings system. The study analyzes whether Moody intended his ratings to reflect his private i...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Financial history review 2011-08, Vol.18 (2), p.155-190 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 190 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 155 |
container_title | Financial history review |
container_volume | 18 |
creator | Wilson, Berry K. |
description | John Moody published his first railroad security analysis and ratings manual in April 1909. This study analyzes several current issues by looking back at Moody's original intentions for constructing a ratings system. The study analyzes whether Moody intended his ratings to reflect his private information, or rather, to serve some alternative role, as with monitoring conflicts of interests or realizing informational economies of scale. The study uses an ordinal regression approach to evaluate a set of explanatory variables, constructed from both the manual itself and the panic months of 1907, to test the potential information content of Moody's ratings. At the time of Moody's first rating system, the illiquidity of the US Treasury market forced investors to seek alternative ‘high-quality’ securities. Indeed, Moody rated 38.94 percent of railroad bonds as Aaa, and rated 85.25 percent of railroad bonds as A, Aa or Aaa in his universe of railroad bonds rated. To further test the informational content of Moody's ratings, the study pursues a structural default analysis during the panic year of 1907, which yields results that indicate that the default risk of railroad securities was quite low at the time. These results provide justification for the high overall ratings that Moody assigned to railroad securities, and thus their role as near risk-free securities. Therefore, railroad securities, and Moody's ratings, played a particularly important role in the financial system at the time. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1017/S0968565011000072 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_884842707</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><cupid>10_1017_S0968565011000072</cupid><sourcerecordid>884842707</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c341t-9c928c4f8beb6c3e2c0e6cb6ae00cbf3c577fe0234984678cebf2eeb61de3d853</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kN9LwzAQgIMoOKd_gG_Flz1VL22apL7J8BdM9qA-lza9zMw2mUn3sP_elA0ExXAk3N33HeQIuaRwTYGKm1couSx4AZRCPCI7IhPKBEsBiuyYTMZ2OvZPyVkIawCag-QT0ixtMnxgYqx2vq8H42yinB3QDonTiY8Vuwq3SW1j1N0umDDWR8V5szJ2zF6ca3ezkITBqc_ItUnj4nWQz8mJrruAF4d3St4f7t_mT-li-fg8v1ukKmd0SEtVZlIxLRtsuMoxU4BcNbxGANXoXBVCaIQsZ6VkXEiFjc4wsrTFvJVFPiWz_dyNd19bDEPVm6Cw62qLbhsqKZlkmQARyatf5NptffxeqErgQmQRjRDdQ8q7EDzqauNNX_tdRaEad1792Xl08oNT94037Qp_Jv9vfQOdpIO0</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>906772884</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>On the information content of ratings: an analysis of the origin of Moody's stock and bond ratings</title><source>Cambridge University Press Journals Complete</source><creator>Wilson, Berry K.</creator><creatorcontrib>Wilson, Berry K.</creatorcontrib><description>John Moody published his first railroad security analysis and ratings manual in April 1909. This study analyzes several current issues by looking back at Moody's original intentions for constructing a ratings system. The study analyzes whether Moody intended his ratings to reflect his private information, or rather, to serve some alternative role, as with monitoring conflicts of interests or realizing informational economies of scale. The study uses an ordinal regression approach to evaluate a set of explanatory variables, constructed from both the manual itself and the panic months of 1907, to test the potential information content of Moody's ratings. At the time of Moody's first rating system, the illiquidity of the US Treasury market forced investors to seek alternative ‘high-quality’ securities. Indeed, Moody rated 38.94 percent of railroad bonds as Aaa, and rated 85.25 percent of railroad bonds as A, Aa or Aaa in his universe of railroad bonds rated. To further test the informational content of Moody's ratings, the study pursues a structural default analysis during the panic year of 1907, which yields results that indicate that the default risk of railroad securities was quite low at the time. These results provide justification for the high overall ratings that Moody assigned to railroad securities, and thus their role as near risk-free securities. Therefore, railroad securities, and Moody's ratings, played a particularly important role in the financial system at the time.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0968-5650</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1474-0052</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1017/S0968565011000072</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press</publisher><subject>Bank reserves ; Bond market ; Bond markets ; Bond ratings ; Central banks ; Collateral ; Credit market ; Credit rating ; Economic development ; Federal regulation ; Financial history ; Financial information ; GDP ; Government bonds ; Government securities ; Gross Domestic Product ; Interstate commerce ; Interstate Commerce Act-US ; Investment bankers ; Investments ; Investors ; Liquidity ; Municipal bonds ; Railroads ; Ratings & rankings</subject><ispartof>Financial history review, 2011-08, Vol.18 (2), p.155-190</ispartof><rights>Copyright © European Association for Banking and Financial History e.V. 2011</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c341t-9c928c4f8beb6c3e2c0e6cb6ae00cbf3c577fe0234984678cebf2eeb61de3d853</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c341t-9c928c4f8beb6c3e2c0e6cb6ae00cbf3c577fe0234984678cebf2eeb61de3d853</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S0968565011000072/type/journal_article$$EHTML$$P50$$Gcambridge$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>164,314,776,780,27901,27902,55603</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Wilson, Berry K.</creatorcontrib><title>On the information content of ratings: an analysis of the origin of Moody's stock and bond ratings</title><title>Financial history review</title><description>John Moody published his first railroad security analysis and ratings manual in April 1909. This study analyzes several current issues by looking back at Moody's original intentions for constructing a ratings system. The study analyzes whether Moody intended his ratings to reflect his private information, or rather, to serve some alternative role, as with monitoring conflicts of interests or realizing informational economies of scale. The study uses an ordinal regression approach to evaluate a set of explanatory variables, constructed from both the manual itself and the panic months of 1907, to test the potential information content of Moody's ratings. At the time of Moody's first rating system, the illiquidity of the US Treasury market forced investors to seek alternative ‘high-quality’ securities. Indeed, Moody rated 38.94 percent of railroad bonds as Aaa, and rated 85.25 percent of railroad bonds as A, Aa or Aaa in his universe of railroad bonds rated. To further test the informational content of Moody's ratings, the study pursues a structural default analysis during the panic year of 1907, which yields results that indicate that the default risk of railroad securities was quite low at the time. These results provide justification for the high overall ratings that Moody assigned to railroad securities, and thus their role as near risk-free securities. Therefore, railroad securities, and Moody's ratings, played a particularly important role in the financial system at the time.</description><subject>Bank reserves</subject><subject>Bond market</subject><subject>Bond markets</subject><subject>Bond ratings</subject><subject>Central banks</subject><subject>Collateral</subject><subject>Credit market</subject><subject>Credit rating</subject><subject>Economic development</subject><subject>Federal regulation</subject><subject>Financial history</subject><subject>Financial information</subject><subject>GDP</subject><subject>Government bonds</subject><subject>Government securities</subject><subject>Gross Domestic Product</subject><subject>Interstate commerce</subject><subject>Interstate Commerce Act-US</subject><subject>Investment bankers</subject><subject>Investments</subject><subject>Investors</subject><subject>Liquidity</subject><subject>Municipal bonds</subject><subject>Railroads</subject><subject>Ratings & rankings</subject><issn>0968-5650</issn><issn>1474-0052</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2011</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kN9LwzAQgIMoOKd_gG_Flz1VL22apL7J8BdM9qA-lza9zMw2mUn3sP_elA0ExXAk3N33HeQIuaRwTYGKm1couSx4AZRCPCI7IhPKBEsBiuyYTMZ2OvZPyVkIawCag-QT0ixtMnxgYqx2vq8H42yinB3QDonTiY8Vuwq3SW1j1N0umDDWR8V5szJ2zF6ca3ezkITBqc_ItUnj4nWQz8mJrruAF4d3St4f7t_mT-li-fg8v1ukKmd0SEtVZlIxLRtsuMoxU4BcNbxGANXoXBVCaIQsZ6VkXEiFjc4wsrTFvJVFPiWz_dyNd19bDEPVm6Cw62qLbhsqKZlkmQARyatf5NptffxeqErgQmQRjRDdQ8q7EDzqauNNX_tdRaEad1792Xl08oNT94037Qp_Jv9vfQOdpIO0</recordid><startdate>20110801</startdate><enddate>20110801</enddate><creator>Wilson, Berry K.</creator><general>Cambridge University Press</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>885</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ANIOZ</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>FRAZJ</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M1F</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PYYUZ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20110801</creationdate><title>On the information content of ratings: an analysis of the origin of Moody's stock and bond ratings</title><author>Wilson, Berry K.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c341t-9c928c4f8beb6c3e2c0e6cb6ae00cbf3c577fe0234984678cebf2eeb61de3d853</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2011</creationdate><topic>Bank reserves</topic><topic>Bond market</topic><topic>Bond markets</topic><topic>Bond ratings</topic><topic>Central banks</topic><topic>Collateral</topic><topic>Credit market</topic><topic>Credit rating</topic><topic>Economic development</topic><topic>Federal regulation</topic><topic>Financial history</topic><topic>Financial information</topic><topic>GDP</topic><topic>Government bonds</topic><topic>Government securities</topic><topic>Gross Domestic Product</topic><topic>Interstate commerce</topic><topic>Interstate Commerce Act-US</topic><topic>Investment bankers</topic><topic>Investments</topic><topic>Investors</topic><topic>Liquidity</topic><topic>Municipal bonds</topic><topic>Railroads</topic><topic>Ratings & rankings</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Wilson, Berry K.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Banking Information Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Accounting, Tax & Banking Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Accounting, Tax & Banking Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>Banking Information Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Financial history review</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Wilson, Berry K.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>On the information content of ratings: an analysis of the origin of Moody's stock and bond ratings</atitle><jtitle>Financial history review</jtitle><date>2011-08-01</date><risdate>2011</risdate><volume>18</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>155</spage><epage>190</epage><pages>155-190</pages><issn>0968-5650</issn><eissn>1474-0052</eissn><abstract>John Moody published his first railroad security analysis and ratings manual in April 1909. This study analyzes several current issues by looking back at Moody's original intentions for constructing a ratings system. The study analyzes whether Moody intended his ratings to reflect his private information, or rather, to serve some alternative role, as with monitoring conflicts of interests or realizing informational economies of scale. The study uses an ordinal regression approach to evaluate a set of explanatory variables, constructed from both the manual itself and the panic months of 1907, to test the potential information content of Moody's ratings. At the time of Moody's first rating system, the illiquidity of the US Treasury market forced investors to seek alternative ‘high-quality’ securities. Indeed, Moody rated 38.94 percent of railroad bonds as Aaa, and rated 85.25 percent of railroad bonds as A, Aa or Aaa in his universe of railroad bonds rated. To further test the informational content of Moody's ratings, the study pursues a structural default analysis during the panic year of 1907, which yields results that indicate that the default risk of railroad securities was quite low at the time. These results provide justification for the high overall ratings that Moody assigned to railroad securities, and thus their role as near risk-free securities. Therefore, railroad securities, and Moody's ratings, played a particularly important role in the financial system at the time.</abstract><cop>Cambridge, UK</cop><pub>Cambridge University Press</pub><doi>10.1017/S0968565011000072</doi><tpages>36</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0968-5650 |
ispartof | Financial history review, 2011-08, Vol.18 (2), p.155-190 |
issn | 0968-5650 1474-0052 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_884842707 |
source | Cambridge University Press Journals Complete |
subjects | Bank reserves Bond market Bond markets Bond ratings Central banks Collateral Credit market Credit rating Economic development Federal regulation Financial history Financial information GDP Government bonds Government securities Gross Domestic Product Interstate commerce Interstate Commerce Act-US Investment bankers Investments Investors Liquidity Municipal bonds Railroads Ratings & rankings |
title | On the information content of ratings: an analysis of the origin of Moody's stock and bond ratings |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-09T22%3A15%3A12IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=On%20the%20information%20content%20of%20ratings:%20an%20analysis%20of%20the%20origin%20of%20Moody's%20stock%20and%20bond%20ratings&rft.jtitle=Financial%20history%20review&rft.au=Wilson,%20Berry%20K.&rft.date=2011-08-01&rft.volume=18&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=155&rft.epage=190&rft.pages=155-190&rft.issn=0968-5650&rft.eissn=1474-0052&rft_id=info:doi/10.1017/S0968565011000072&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E884842707%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=906772884&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_cupid=10_1017_S0968565011000072&rfr_iscdi=true |