Spiritual Assessment and Native Americans: Establishing the Social Validity of a Complementary Set of Assessment Tools
Although social work practitioners are increasingly likely to administer spiritual assessments with Native American clients, few qualitative assessment instruments have been validated with this population. This mixed-method study validates a complementary set of spiritual assessment instruments. Dra...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Social work (New York) 2011-07, Vol.56 (3), p.213-223 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 223 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 3 |
| container_start_page | 213 |
| container_title | Social work (New York) |
| container_volume | 56 |
| creator | Hodge, David R. Limb, Gordon E. |
| description | Although social work practitioners are increasingly likely to administer spiritual assessments with Native American clients, few qualitative assessment instruments have been validated with this population. This mixed-method study validates a complementary set of spiritual assessment instruments. Drawing on the social validity literature, a sample of experts in Native culture (N = 50) evaluated the instruments' cultural consistency, strengths, limitations, and areas needing improvement. Regarding the degree of congruence with Native American culture, verbally based spiritual histories ranked highest and diagrammatically oriented spiritual genograms ranked lowest, although all instruments demonstrated at least moderate levels of consistency with Native culture. The results also suggest that practitioners' level of spiritual competence plays a crucial role in ensuring the instruments are operationalized in a culturally appropriate manner. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1093/sw/56.3.213 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_884424758</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A262582572</galeid><ericid>EJ936083</ericid><jstor_id>23719199</jstor_id><oup_id>10.1093/sw/56.3.213</oup_id><sourcerecordid>A262582572</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c600t-c4bd239a0f6832104c83ccb9b1093e00fd87b3e0f8353ff92c59ada9b3d929f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqN0ltv0zAUAOAIgVgZPPEKyAIJhFA6X3KxeauqMoaq7aEVr5bjOJ0rJy62s7F_j6OUQVEFKIoS2d85vpyTJM8RnCLIyJm_PcuLKZliRB4kE5RneVrQrHiYTCAkZUphVpwkT7zfQohwCdHj5AQjmlFIi0lys9ppp0MvDJh5r7xvVReA6GpwKYK-UWDWKqel6PxHsPBBVEb7a91tQLhWYGWljoFfhdG1DnfANkCAuW13Rg1phLsDKxWG4d9yr601_mnyqBHGq2f772my_rRYzz-ny6vzi_lsmcoCwpDKrKoxYQI2BSUYwUxSImXFquHgCsKmpmUVfxpKctI0DMuciVqwitQMs4acJu_GtDtnv_XKB95qL5UxolO295zSLMNZmdMoX_8ht7Z3XdwbZxhnOL4oojcj2gijuO4aG5yQQ0o-wwXOKc5LHFV6RG1Up5wwtlONjsMHfnrEx6dWrZZHA94fBEQT1PewEb33_GJ1-d-Wni__tvG9ldYYtVE8FmZ-deg_jF46671TDd853caqcwT5UCHub3lecMJja0b9an_DfdWq-t7-7MUIXoxgaLj76cUXRgpIh_i347Ttd_9Y6OUItz5Y92sdUiKGGCM_AB-J-Vg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>922422241</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Spiritual Assessment and Native Americans: Establishing the Social Validity of a Complementary Set of Assessment Tools</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing</source><source>Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current)</source><source>Education Source</source><creator>Hodge, David R. ; Limb, Gordon E.</creator><creatorcontrib>Hodge, David R. ; Limb, Gordon E.</creatorcontrib><description>Although social work practitioners are increasingly likely to administer spiritual assessments with Native American clients, few qualitative assessment instruments have been validated with this population. This mixed-method study validates a complementary set of spiritual assessment instruments. Drawing on the social validity literature, a sample of experts in Native culture (N = 50) evaluated the instruments' cultural consistency, strengths, limitations, and areas needing improvement. Regarding the degree of congruence with Native American culture, verbally based spiritual histories ranked highest and diagrammatically oriented spiritual genograms ranked lowest, although all instruments demonstrated at least moderate levels of consistency with Native culture. The results also suggest that practitioners' level of spiritual competence plays a crucial role in ensuring the instruments are operationalized in a culturally appropriate manner.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0037-8046</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1545-6846</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1093/sw/56.3.213</identifier><identifier>PMID: 21848086</identifier><identifier>CODEN: SOWOA8</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: NASW PRESS</publisher><subject>Academic Standards ; Accreditation (Institutions) ; American Indian Culture ; American Indians ; Anthropology, Cultural - methods ; Assessed values ; Behavioral Science Research ; Communities ; Cultural Competency ; Cultural history ; Cultural Relevance ; Cultural values ; Female ; Humans ; Indians, North American - psychology ; Male ; Measures (Individuals) ; Mental health ; Middle Aged ; Native Americans ; Native culture ; Native North Americans ; Native peoples ; Psychiatry ; Religion ; Religious aspects ; Religious Factors ; Reproducibility of Results ; Social aspects ; Social values ; Social Work ; Social workers ; Spiritual belief systems ; Spirituality ; United States ; United States history ; Validity ; Values</subject><ispartof>Social work (New York), 2011-07, Vol.56 (3), p.213-223</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2011 National Association of Social Workers, Inc.</rights><rights>2011 National Association of Social Workers 2011</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2011 Oxford University Press</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2011 Oxford University Press</rights><rights>Copyright National Association of Social Workers, Incorporated Jul 2011</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c600t-c4bd239a0f6832104c83ccb9b1093e00fd87b3e0f8353ff92c59ada9b3d929f3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/23719199$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/23719199$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>315,782,786,805,1586,27931,27932,58024,58257</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ936083$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21848086$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Hodge, David R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Limb, Gordon E.</creatorcontrib><title>Spiritual Assessment and Native Americans: Establishing the Social Validity of a Complementary Set of Assessment Tools</title><title>Social work (New York)</title><addtitle>Social Work</addtitle><addtitle>Soc Work</addtitle><description>Although social work practitioners are increasingly likely to administer spiritual assessments with Native American clients, few qualitative assessment instruments have been validated with this population. This mixed-method study validates a complementary set of spiritual assessment instruments. Drawing on the social validity literature, a sample of experts in Native culture (N = 50) evaluated the instruments' cultural consistency, strengths, limitations, and areas needing improvement. Regarding the degree of congruence with Native American culture, verbally based spiritual histories ranked highest and diagrammatically oriented spiritual genograms ranked lowest, although all instruments demonstrated at least moderate levels of consistency with Native culture. The results also suggest that practitioners' level of spiritual competence plays a crucial role in ensuring the instruments are operationalized in a culturally appropriate manner.</description><subject>Academic Standards</subject><subject>Accreditation (Institutions)</subject><subject>American Indian Culture</subject><subject>American Indians</subject><subject>Anthropology, Cultural - methods</subject><subject>Assessed values</subject><subject>Behavioral Science Research</subject><subject>Communities</subject><subject>Cultural Competency</subject><subject>Cultural history</subject><subject>Cultural Relevance</subject><subject>Cultural values</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Indians, North American - psychology</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Measures (Individuals)</subject><subject>Mental health</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Native Americans</subject><subject>Native culture</subject><subject>Native North Americans</subject><subject>Native peoples</subject><subject>Psychiatry</subject><subject>Religion</subject><subject>Religious aspects</subject><subject>Religious Factors</subject><subject>Reproducibility of Results</subject><subject>Social aspects</subject><subject>Social values</subject><subject>Social Work</subject><subject>Social workers</subject><subject>Spiritual belief systems</subject><subject>Spirituality</subject><subject>United States</subject><subject>United States history</subject><subject>Validity</subject><subject>Values</subject><issn>0037-8046</issn><issn>1545-6846</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2011</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNqN0ltv0zAUAOAIgVgZPPEKyAIJhFA6X3KxeauqMoaq7aEVr5bjOJ0rJy62s7F_j6OUQVEFKIoS2d85vpyTJM8RnCLIyJm_PcuLKZliRB4kE5RneVrQrHiYTCAkZUphVpwkT7zfQohwCdHj5AQjmlFIi0lys9ppp0MvDJh5r7xvVReA6GpwKYK-UWDWKqel6PxHsPBBVEb7a91tQLhWYGWljoFfhdG1DnfANkCAuW13Rg1phLsDKxWG4d9yr601_mnyqBHGq2f772my_rRYzz-ny6vzi_lsmcoCwpDKrKoxYQI2BSUYwUxSImXFquHgCsKmpmUVfxpKctI0DMuciVqwitQMs4acJu_GtDtnv_XKB95qL5UxolO295zSLMNZmdMoX_8ht7Z3XdwbZxhnOL4oojcj2gijuO4aG5yQQ0o-wwXOKc5LHFV6RG1Up5wwtlONjsMHfnrEx6dWrZZHA94fBEQT1PewEb33_GJ1-d-Wni__tvG9ldYYtVE8FmZ-deg_jF46671TDd853caqcwT5UCHub3lecMJja0b9an_DfdWq-t7-7MUIXoxgaLj76cUXRgpIh_i347Ttd_9Y6OUItz5Y92sdUiKGGCM_AB-J-Vg</recordid><startdate>20110701</startdate><enddate>20110701</enddate><creator>Hodge, David R.</creator><creator>Limb, Gordon E.</creator><general>NASW PRESS</general><general>Oxford University Press</general><general>National Association of Social Workers (NASW)</general><scope>7SW</scope><scope>BJH</scope><scope>BNH</scope><scope>BNI</scope><scope>BNJ</scope><scope>BNO</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>PET</scope><scope>REK</scope><scope>WWN</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8GL</scope><scope>ISN</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>4T-</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88B</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>88J</scope><scope>8AM</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGRYB</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>CJNVE</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HEHIP</scope><scope>K7.</scope><scope>K9-</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0O</scope><scope>M0P</scope><scope>M0R</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2R</scope><scope>M2S</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQEDU</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20110701</creationdate><title>Spiritual Assessment and Native Americans: Establishing the Social Validity of a Complementary Set of Assessment Tools</title><author>Hodge, David R. ; Limb, Gordon E.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c600t-c4bd239a0f6832104c83ccb9b1093e00fd87b3e0f8353ff92c59ada9b3d929f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2011</creationdate><topic>Academic Standards</topic><topic>Accreditation (Institutions)</topic><topic>American Indian Culture</topic><topic>American Indians</topic><topic>Anthropology, Cultural - methods</topic><topic>Assessed values</topic><topic>Behavioral Science Research</topic><topic>Communities</topic><topic>Cultural Competency</topic><topic>Cultural history</topic><topic>Cultural Relevance</topic><topic>Cultural values</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Indians, North American - psychology</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Measures (Individuals)</topic><topic>Mental health</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Native Americans</topic><topic>Native culture</topic><topic>Native North Americans</topic><topic>Native peoples</topic><topic>Psychiatry</topic><topic>Religion</topic><topic>Religious aspects</topic><topic>Religious Factors</topic><topic>Reproducibility of Results</topic><topic>Social aspects</topic><topic>Social values</topic><topic>Social Work</topic><topic>Social workers</topic><topic>Spiritual belief systems</topic><topic>Spirituality</topic><topic>United States</topic><topic>United States history</topic><topic>Validity</topic><topic>Values</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Hodge, David R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Limb, Gordon E.</creatorcontrib><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Ovid)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>ERIC( SilverPlatter )</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC PlusText (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>Education Resources Information Center (ERIC)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale In Context: High School</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Canada</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Docstoc</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Education Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Social Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Criminal Justice Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>eLibrary</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Criminology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Education Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>Sociology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Criminal Justice (Alumni)</collection><collection>Consumer Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Criminal Justice Database</collection><collection>Education Database</collection><collection>Consumer Health Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Psychology Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Social Science Database</collection><collection>Sociology Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Education</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Social work (New York)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Hodge, David R.</au><au>Limb, Gordon E.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ936083</ericid><atitle>Spiritual Assessment and Native Americans: Establishing the Social Validity of a Complementary Set of Assessment Tools</atitle><jtitle>Social work (New York)</jtitle><stitle>Social Work</stitle><addtitle>Soc Work</addtitle><date>2011-07-01</date><risdate>2011</risdate><volume>56</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>213</spage><epage>223</epage><pages>213-223</pages><issn>0037-8046</issn><eissn>1545-6846</eissn><coden>SOWOA8</coden><abstract>Although social work practitioners are increasingly likely to administer spiritual assessments with Native American clients, few qualitative assessment instruments have been validated with this population. This mixed-method study validates a complementary set of spiritual assessment instruments. Drawing on the social validity literature, a sample of experts in Native culture (N = 50) evaluated the instruments' cultural consistency, strengths, limitations, and areas needing improvement. Regarding the degree of congruence with Native American culture, verbally based spiritual histories ranked highest and diagrammatically oriented spiritual genograms ranked lowest, although all instruments demonstrated at least moderate levels of consistency with Native culture. The results also suggest that practitioners' level of spiritual competence plays a crucial role in ensuring the instruments are operationalized in a culturally appropriate manner.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>NASW PRESS</pub><pmid>21848086</pmid><doi>10.1093/sw/56.3.213</doi><tpages>11</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0037-8046 |
| ispartof | Social work (New York), 2011-07, Vol.56 (3), p.213-223 |
| issn | 0037-8046 1545-6846 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_884424758 |
| source | MEDLINE; JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing; Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current); Education Source |
| subjects | Academic Standards Accreditation (Institutions) American Indian Culture American Indians Anthropology, Cultural - methods Assessed values Behavioral Science Research Communities Cultural Competency Cultural history Cultural Relevance Cultural values Female Humans Indians, North American - psychology Male Measures (Individuals) Mental health Middle Aged Native Americans Native culture Native North Americans Native peoples Psychiatry Religion Religious aspects Religious Factors Reproducibility of Results Social aspects Social values Social Work Social workers Spiritual belief systems Spirituality United States United States history Validity Values |
| title | Spiritual Assessment and Native Americans: Establishing the Social Validity of a Complementary Set of Assessment Tools |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-04T05%3A49%3A32IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Spiritual%20Assessment%20and%20Native%20Americans:%20Establishing%20the%20Social%20Validity%20of%20a%20Complementary%20Set%20of%20Assessment%20Tools&rft.jtitle=Social%20work%20(New%20York)&rft.au=Hodge,%20David%20R.&rft.date=2011-07-01&rft.volume=56&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=213&rft.epage=223&rft.pages=213-223&rft.issn=0037-8046&rft.eissn=1545-6846&rft.coden=SOWOA8&rft_id=info:doi/10.1093/sw/56.3.213&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA262582572%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=922422241&rft_id=info:pmid/21848086&rft_galeid=A262582572&rft_ericid=EJ936083&rft_jstor_id=23719199&rft_oup_id=10.1093/sw/56.3.213&rfr_iscdi=true |